DOCSLIB.ORG

Réfugiés Congolais Du Sud Kivu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Réfugiés Congolais Du Sud Kivu Congolese Refugees From South Kivu : Challenges of return in the territories of Fizi and Uvira June 2011 Congolese refugees from Tanzania about to cross Lake Tanganyika after a visit to their home villages in Baraka, South Kivu. May 2011. Photo: Alexis Bouvy. Study carried out by ADEPAE and SVH with the financial and technical support of the Great Lakes Civil Society Project of the Danish Refugee Council. Congolese Refugees From South Kivu: Challenges of return in the territories of Fizi and Uvira June 2011 Congolese Refugees From South Kivu : Challenges of return in the territories of Fizi and Uvira Action pour le Développement et la Paix Endogènes / Solidarité des Volontaires pour l’Humanité - June 2011 Table of contents Thank you .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Presentation of both organisations ..................................................................................................................... 5 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Executive summary .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Map of South Kivu............................................................................................................................................... 13 I. Return and Resettlement in South Kivu......................................................................................................... 14 I. AN AREA OF CONFLICT FROM THE ONSET ............................................................................................................. 14 II. REPATRIATION: PERSPECTIVES AND POLITICAL STAKES ....................................................................................... 15 III. PERCEPTIONS OF THE RESISTANCE TO RETURN .................................................................................................. 17 IV. CHALLENGES OF RESETTLEMENT ....................................................................................................................... 18 IV. 1. Insufficient food and agricultural products ................................................................................................... 18 IV. 2. Land insecurity............................................................................................................................................. 19 IV. 3. Access to social services ............................................................................................................................. 22 IV. 4. Armed confrontation .................................................................................................................................... 22 II. Response strategies ....................................................................................................................................... 24 I. LEGAL AND POLITICAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................................................... 24 I.1. Tripartite Agreements ...................................................................................................................................... 24 I.2. Implementation and political tensions ............................................................................................................. 25 II. HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE, STRIKING A BALANCE BETWEEN EMERGENCY AND DEVELOPMENT ............................ 27 II.1. Transit centres ............................................................................................................................................... 28 II.2. Schooling for children ..................................................................................................................................... 28 II.3. Shelter ............................................................................................................................................................ 29 II.4. Community self-sufficiency projects and RGAs ............................................................................................. 30 II.5. Medical assistance ......................................................................................................................................... 31 II.6. Land mediation............................................................................................................................................... 32 II.7. Raising awareness of peaceful cohabitation .................................................................................................. 33 II.8. Local initiatives ............................................................................................................................................... 34 III. WEAKNESSES OF THE RESPONSE ....................................................................................................................... 34 III.1. Consistency and coordination ....................................................................................................................... 34 III.2. Limitations of the Early Recovery Cluster ..................................................................................................... 35 III.3. Relations between authorities, STAREC and humanitarian actors ............................................................... 36 III.4. Communication and transparency ................................................................................................................ 36 III.5. Authorities too far removed from realities on the ground .............................................................................. 37 III.6. Security assessment ..................................................................................................................................... 37 III. Towards a Conflict-Sensitive Approach to Repatriation ............................................................................ 39 I. FEARS AND SUSPICIONS IN RELATION TO THE REPATRIATIONS FROM BURUNDI ....................................................... 39 II. MINEMBWE, THE FRF AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF LANDLOCKED POPULATIONS ............................. 40 III. CONFLICTS ASSOCIATED WITH CUSTOMARY POWER ........................................................................................... 41 IV. REPATRIATION AND LAND ................................................................................................................................... 43 V. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 44 IV. Conclusions et Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 46 Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................ 49 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................................ 51 3 Congolese Refugees From South Kivu : Challenges of return in the territories of Fizi and Uvira Action pour le Développement et la Paix Endogènes / Solidarité des Volontaires pour l’Humanité - June 2011 Thank you This work is the result of a concerted effort between researchers from ADEPAE and SVH, the Danish Refugee Council's Great Lakes Civil Society Project team, a technical expert, and the various people encountered during the course of the study. The underlying goal of the study is to propose solutions to the hardships suffered by returning refugees to the South Kivu province of the Democratic Republic of Congo. We hope that governmental and humanitarian actors, civil society and local communities will draw on our conclusions to establish mechanisms capable of facilitating the reintegration of refugees, improving social relations between returnees and residents, stabilising their social and economic conditions, and bringing long-lasting peace to the territories of Fizi and Uvira. We would like to thank the members of the Danish Refugee Council's Great Lakes Civil Society Project without whose support this study would not have been possible. We are delighted with the relationship of trust that has come about between our three organisations, and the partnership we have established through this project. We would like to extend our gratitude to the consultant, Alexis Bouvy, who went to great lengths to accompany the researchers and to guide our thought process. Lastly, many thanks go to the chefs d'antennes of the Commission Nationale pour les Réfugiés (CNR) of Bukavu and Uvira, UNHCR’s offices in Bukavu and Uvira, OCHA's office in Bukavu, national and international organisations, the province's customary leaders, and the team representing our two organisations for their contribution to our reflection. Bukavu, June 2011 ADEPAE and SVH 4 Congolese Refugees From South Kivu : Challenges of return in the territories of Fizi and Uvira Action pour le Développement et la Paix Endogènes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identity, Territory, and Power in the Eastern Congo Rift Valley Institute | Usalama Project
    RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE | USALAMA PROJECT UNDERSTANDING CONGOLESE ARMED GROUPS SOUTH KIVU IDENTITY, TERRITORY, AND POWER IN THE EASTERN CONGO RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE | USALAMA PROJECT South Kivu Identity, territory, and power in the eastern Congo KOEN VLASSENROOT Published in 2013 by the Rift Valley Institute 1 St Luke’s Mews, London W11 1DF, United Kingdom PO Box 52771 GPO, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya THE USALAMA PROJECT The Rift Valley Institute’s Usalama Project documents armed groups in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The project is supported by Humanity United and Open Square, and undertaken in collaboration with the Catholic University of Bukavu. THE RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE (RVI) The Rift Valley Institute (www.riftvalley.net) works in Eastern and Central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political, and economic development. THE AUTHOR Koen Vlassenroot is Professor of Political Science and director of the Conflict Research Group at the University of Ghent. He is associated to the Egmont Institute and a RVI fellow. He co-authored Conflict and Social Transformation in Eastern DR Congo (2004) and co-edited The Lord’s Resistance Army: Myth or Reality? (2010). He is the lead researcher on the DRC for the Justice and Security Research Programme. CREDITS RVI ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR: John Ryle RVI PROgRAMME DIRECTOR: Christopher Kidner RVI USALAMA PROJECT DIRECTOR: Jason Stearns RVI USALAMA DEPUTY PROJECT DIRECTOR: Willy Mikenye RVI Great LAKES PROgRAMME MANAgER: Michel Thill RVI Information OFFICER: Tymon Kiepe EDITORIAL consultant: Fergus Nicoll Report DESIgN: Lindsay Nash Maps: Jillian Luff, MAPgrafix PRINTINg: Intype Libra Ltd., 3/4 Elm Grove Industrial Estate, London SW19 4HE ISBN 978-1-907431-25-8 COVER CAPTION Congolese woman carrying firewood in the hills of Minembwe, South Kivu (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of Congo, Fourth Quarter 2020
    DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, 6 May 2018b; administrative divisions: GADM, 6 May 2018a; incid- ent data: ACLED, 12 March 2021; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Battles 321 180 731 Conflict incidents by category 2 Violence against civilians 293 153 530 Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 2 Protests 134 1 1 Riots 96 35 53 Methodology 3 Strategic developments 50 1 4 Conflict incidents per province 4 Explosions / Remote 2 0 0 violence Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 896 370 1319 Disclaimer 7 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). 2 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Methodology on what level of detail is reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Extérieures Et Communication
    Scan the QR code or Ctrl+clic on the icon below to Relations extérieures et Communication view our videos. https://ucbukavu.ac.cd/ – Super Lacus Ac Montes Splendens 02 Bugabo, Avenue de la Mission, Commune de Kadutu, Ville de Bukavu REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO MISE AU POINT SUR LES SITUATIONS UPDATE ON LOCAL HEALTH AND SAFETY SANITAIRE ET SECURITAIRE LOCALES STATUS N°009 – 15 MAI 2020 N°009 – 15 MAY 2020 SITUATION SECURITAIRE SECURITY STATUS La situation sécuritaire est relativement calme dans The security situation in Bukavu City is relatively la Ville de Bukavu. Une personne a été blessée et calm. One person was injured and valuables were des biens de valeur emportés lors d’une attaque taken during an attack by armed men against a des hommes armés contre une famille à family in Mulambula, Bagira District. In Ibanda Mulambula en Commune de Bagira. En Commune District, a woman working at Ruzizi I border d’Ibanda, une femme œuvrant à la frontière Ruzizi (between DRC and Rwanda) was deprived of her 1er a été dépouillée de son sac à main contenant purse containing a large amount of money and une importante somme d’argent et autres objets other valuables. In Uvira Territory, two alleged de grande valeur. En territoire d’Uvira, deux thieves, one being a Burundian, were caught by the présumés voleurs, dont un de nationalité population and handed over to the National Army burundaise, ont été attrapés par la population et (FARDC) in Luvungi. In Kabare Territory, passengers remis aux FARDC à Luvungi. Les passagers de cinq of five vehicles from Bukavu to Mugogo and véhicules en provenance de Bukavu pour les Walungu commercial centers were looted by centres commerciaux de Mugogo et Walungu ont armed bandits in Cidodobo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women's Platform of the Peace, Security and Cooperation
    Bureau de l’Envoyé spécial du Secrétaire général des Nations Unies pour la région des Grands Lacs The Women’s Platform of the Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework Field Monitoring Report in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda August/September 2015 Office of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for the Great Lakes Region TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 A. Findings 4 B. Key Recommendations 5 1.0 Introduction 6 1.1 The Field Monitoring, Purpose and Objectives 6 1.2 Methodology 6 1.3 The Field Monitoring Report 6 2.0 The Women’s Platform of the PSC Framework 7 2.1 Results/ achievements per thematic area 7 Thematic area 1: Monitoring and Advocacy on the PSC Framework and the implementation of regional and national plans of action under UN Security Council Resolution 1325 7 Thematic area 2: Combating Violence against Women and Supporting Women affected by Violence 8 Thematic area 3: Advancing Women’s Livelihoods and Development 9 Thematic area 4: Access to Clean Energy at the local level (i.e., using solar energy, labor-saving technologies, etc.) 9 2.2 Successes and Good practices 10 2.3 Initial Observed Changes 11 2.4 Challenges and Lessons Learned 12 3.0 Partnerships with Stakeholders 13 4.0 Enabling environment 14 4.1 Advocacy and awareness raising 14 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 14 5.1 Recommendations to Governments of the region 14 5.2 Recommendations to the Office of the Special Envoy 15 5.3 Recommendations to the Global Fund for Women 16 2 Office of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
    DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO MONTHLY REFUGEE STATISTICS Situation as of November 30, 2020 Type Age 0-4 5-11 12-17 18-59 60+ Total % Total Rural (out of camp) 75,821 105,155 62,321 131,723 9,121 384,141 73.3% Total Camps/Sites 23,501 39,046 20,860 47,419 2,981 133,807 25.5% Total 524,302 Total Urban 620 1,487 1,132 2,939 176 6,354 1.2% Grand Total 99,942 145,688 84,313 182,081 12,278 524,302 Refugee Population in DRC Refugee Population by Province in DRC Country Female Male Total % Province Main Location Type Female Male Total Angola** 179 235 414 0.08% Bas Uele Ango & Bondo Rural 22,519 17,697 40,216 Burundi* 25,022 23,530 48,552 9.26% Equateur Disperced Rural 143 213 356 CAR* 91,469 79,582 171,051 32.62% Haut Katanga Lubumbashi & Urb. & Rur. 1,742 Arounds 808 934 Rep.Congo 251 386 637 0.12% Haut Uele Dungu, Doruma Rural 22,311 19,394 41,705 Rwanda*** 107,534 106,440 213,974 40.81% Ituri Aru & Ariwara Rural 25,506 22,351 47,857 S. Sudan* 47,837 41,737 89,574 17.08% Kasai Oriental Tshiala Rural 2 6 8 Kinshasa & Sudan 8 24 32 0.01% Kinshasa Urb. & Rur. 790 outskirts 375 415 Bas Fleuve, Uganda 13 10 23 0.004% Kongo Central Rural 817 MbanzaNg. & Kimaza 328 489 Somalia 7 7 14 0.003% Lomami Luila &MweneDitu Rural 430 456 886 Ivory Coast 4 3 7 0.001% Lualaba Dilolo,Sandoa &Kolwezi Rural 590 596 1,186 Other 10 14 24 0.005% Maniema Pangi, Kailo&Lukolo Rural 203 269 472 Lubero, Masisi, Total 272,334 251,968 524,302 100% Nord Kivu Urb.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding Use of Household Water Treatment in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo Results and Lessons Learned
    EXPANDING USE OF HOUSEHOLD WATER TREATMENT IN SOUTH KIVU, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO RESULTS AND LESSONS LEARNED PROGRAM CONTEXT in rural areas have access to improved water sources. Even then, water from an improved One of the largest countries in Africa in both water source may not be safe. Transport and size and population, the Democratic Republic storage of water can be major periods of re- of Congo (DRC) is one of the poorest contamination. The urban/rural divide carries in the world. According to the 2010 UN over into access to sanitation as well: only Development Index, it ranks 168th out of 4% of households in rural areas have access 169 countries, ahead of only Zimbabwe.1 For to improved sanitation compared to 36% in DRC’s 71 million people, life expectancy is a urban areas. relatively short 48 years, due to continuing civil conflict and high rates of poverty, disease The lack of safe water, adequate hygiene, and and famine.2 This high level of conflict has sanitation negatively impacts child health led to a humanitarian crisis in the country, and adds to the high mortality rate (148 per especially in the eastern regions. 1,000 live births). In 2007, 16% of children under age five had diarrhea during the two According to the 2010 Multiple Indicator weeks preceding the Demographic and Health Cluster (MICS) survey, only 47% of the Survey (DHS).4 According to the 2010 MICS population has access to improved water survey, this has grown to 18%.5 sources. 3There is also a significant urban/ rural disparity in water access.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruzizi Plain
    The Ruzizi Plain A CROSSROADS OF CONFLICT AND VIOLENCE Judith Verweijen, Juvénal Twaibu, Oscar Dunia Abedi and Alexis Ndisanze Ntababarwa INSECURE LIVELIHOODS SERIES / NOVEMBER 2020 Photo cover: Bar in Sange, Ruzizi Plain © Judith Verweijen 2017 The Ruzizi Plain A CROSSROADS OF CONFLICT AND VIOLENCE Judith Verweijen, Juvénal Twaibu, Oscar Dunia Abedi and Alexis Ndisanze Ntababarwa Executive summary The Ruzizi Plain in South Kivu Province has been the theatre of ongoing conflicts and violence for over two decades. Patterns and dynamics of con- flicts and violence have significantly evolved over time. Historically, conflict dynamics have largely centred on disputed customary authority – often framed in terms of intercommunity conflict. Violence was connected to these conflicts, which generated local security dilemmas. Consequently, armed groups mobilized to defend their commu- nity, albeit often at the behest of political and military entrepreneurs with more self-interested motives. At present, however, violence is mostly related to armed groups’ revenue-generation strategies, which involve armed burglary, robbery, assassinations, kidnappings for ransom and cattle-looting. Violence is also significantly nourished by interpersonal conflicts involving debt, family matters, and rivalries. In recent years, regional tensions and the activities of foreign armed groups and forces have become an additional factor of instability. Unfortunately, stabilization interventions have largely overlooked or been unable to address these changing drivers of violence. They have mostly focused on local conflict resolution, with less effort directed at addressing supra-local factors, such as the behaviour of political elites and the national army, and geopolitical tensions between countries in the Great Lakes Region. Future stabilization efforts will need to take these dimensions better into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of Congo: Cholera in the Uvira and Fizi Territories; No
    DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO: CHOLERA IN THE No. MDRZR001 UVIRA AND FIZI 5 September 2006 TERRITORIES INTERIM FINAL REPORT The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 185 countries. In Brief Period covered by this Interim Final Report: 17 March to 16 May 2006. History of this Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF)-funded operation: · CHF 49,000 was allocated from the Federations DREF on 17 March 2006 to respond to the needs of this operation, or to replenish disaster preparedness stocks distributed to the affected population. Refer to: http://www.ifrc.org/docs/appeals/06/MDRZR001.pdf for the DREF Bulletin. · DREF Bulletin Update no. 1 – http://www.ifrc.org/docs/appeals/06/MDRZR00101.pdf – was issued on 22 March 2006. · This operation was expected to be implemented in two months, and completed by 16 May 2006. In line with Federation reporting standards, the DREF Bulletin Final Report was due 90 days after the end of the operation. <Click here to go directly to the attached interim financial report> The International Federation undertakes activities that are aligned with its Global Agenda, which sets out four broad goals to meet the Federation's mission to "improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity". Global Agenda Goals: · Reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters. · Reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Risks of Instrumentalizing the Narrative on Sexual Violence in The
    International Review of the Red Cross (2014), 96 (894), 625–639. Sexual violence in armed conflict 10.1017/S1816383115000132 OPINION NOTE The risks of instrumentalizing the narrative on sexual violence in the DRC: Neglected needs and unintended consequences Laura Heaton Laura Heaton is an East Africa-based writer and reporter whose extensive field research throughout the region has focused primarily on conflict and human rights, humanitarian assistance, and women’s experiences in war. Her reporting has appeared in several magazines and newspapers, including Newsweek, Foreign Policy, National Geographic, and the Daily Telegraph. She is currently contributing to a book on the role of women’s leadership in the rebuilding of post-genocide Rwanda. Keywords: Democratic Republic of the Congo, sexual violence, war, conflict, peacekeeping, advocacy, aid. Public understanding of humanitarian emergencies tends to focus on one story and one type of victim.1 Examples are manifold: amputees in Sierra Leone, victims of kidnapping in Colombia, or victims of chemical weapons in Syria. At times, the aid community, and the media in turn, seizes upon a particular injustice – landmines, female genital mutilation and child soldiers are examples from recent decades – and directs resources and attention its way. Similarly, thematic trends tend to dominate aid discourse, with funding proposals to donors replete with references to the framework du jour. In a related phenomenon highlighted by author and aid worker Fiona Terry, “[w]ords are commandeered to give a new © icrc 2015 625 L. Heaton gloss to familiar themes: ‘capacity building’ became ‘empowerment’, which has now become ‘resilience’”.2 In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the conflict has been largely defined by sexual violence, and raped women are its most prominent victims.
    [Show full text]
  • D R Congo : Earthquake in Great Lakes Region Issued on 8 Feb 2008
    UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - Democratic Republic of Congo D R Congo : Earthquake in Great Lakes region Issued on 8 Feb 2008 An earthquake of magnitude 6.1 on the Richter’s scale stroke the pro- J"!(Katana Dead: 1 person Injured: 22 persons vince of South Kivu, in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo on Sun- day 3 February 2008 at 07H35 GMT (09H35 local time). Kalehe Idjwi !( Nyakalengwa Lwiro 10 Schools damaged ! 12 Churches damaged The epicentre of the earthquake lies approximately 20 km north of Kakondo Kabare Dead: 2 persons ! the provincial capital, Bukavu, near the localites of Kivumu and Bira- Bukavu Injured: 20 persons Mirunga va. A series of successive aftershocks occurred again today. Walungu ! Shabunda Mbayo IDJWI Impact of the earthquake South Kivu Uvira ! Buhandahanda ! Mwenga Kamakombe • 7 confirmed deaths. Some 447 injured persons have been treated. ! Luhihi • According to the Mayor of Bukavu, a total of 250 buildings were ! Ishungu ! destroyed in Kabare, Walungu, Kalehe, Idjwi territories, including the Stshombo 99 already identified in Bukavu town ! Mushweswe Butorangwe Kavumu Kuvumu ! ! Response J"! Fizi ¼ Mululu ! 1. Non-Food Items/Emergency Shelters/Food: 250 buildings destroyed in .! Mulangani Bukavu, Kabare, Walungu, Tshibinda ! ! Epicenter Kalehe, Idjwi territories 05010025 1,729 affected families received assistance (1,050 families in Bukavu, Luamisole Magnitude: 6.1 M and 679 in the surroundings) KilometresKalonge Mulungu ! ! ! Depth: 33 km 10 km Bukavu: KABARE • UNHCR and local NGO partner ADSSE: non-food assistance to 202 Miti J"!(BiravaBirava affected families in the Commune of Ibanda 20 km ! Kanonzi ! • IRC: NFI kits to 848 affected families through the Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM) (230 in Ndendere neighbourhood, 584 registered Mulalo Mushuva families in the Commune of Bagira).
    [Show full text]
  • The Banyamulenge Tutsi Survivors of the Gatumba Refugee Camp Massacre
    © 2007 Center for Applied Linguistics The contents of this publication were developed under an agreement nanced by the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, United States Department of State, but do not necessarily represent the policy of that agency and should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. The U.S. Department of State reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, this work for Government purposes. The Banyamulenge Tutsi Survivors of the Gatumba Refugee Camp Massacre Lubumbashi, and other Congolese cities were attacked, killed, and later imprisoned (in some cases for their own The Need for Resettlement safety). From 1999 to 2000, the United States accepted for in the United States resettlement some of these imprisoned families, who had The resettlement of the Gatumba massacre survivors is, in been referred to U.S. refugee officials by the United Nations essence, a humanitarian rescue mission of a group of people High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). These individuals for whom there are no other good options. became the core of the current Banyamulenge community in There are three internationally accepted solutions to a refu- America. gee situation. The first and best solution is for the refugees to After the peace agreement in 2003 between the various return to their own homes, safely and voluntarily. The second- rebel movements and the Congolese government, Congolese best solution is for them to integrate into the communities Tutsi hoped that they would no longer be discriminated where they have fled; these are often places that are familiar against and subject to violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
    OPERATIONAL UPDATE Democratic Republic of the Congo 1 - 30 Septembre 2018 The security situation and human New arrivals of South 24,371 refugees at Lusenda site rights environment in Beni Sudanese refugees are creating received biomass briquettes; the Territory, North Kivu Province, growing shelter and space needs. first distribution of this scale for significantly deteriorated. UNHCR is The capacity of Meri settlement is Burundian refugees in South Kivu trying to ensure continuous of 20,000 people, but 33,517 Province. Biomass briquettes presence in Beni through missions refugees currently reside there. provide an environmentally-friendly from Goma and other offices. solution for cooking. Refugees Burundian refugees Total in the DRC Difference from previous month Repatriated this month 47,023 +511 10 As of 30 September 2018 ■ As of the end of September, 310 refugees at Lusenda site were registered as candidates for voluntary repatriation. On 18 September, 10 voluntarily returned to Burundi from Uvira, South Kivu Province. UNHCR provided transport and repatriation kits. 3 non-registered family members were also transported. ■ Between 31 August and 7 September, 305 refugees at Mulongwe settlement received cash transfers through mobile money. US$21,178 was transferred to cover school fees for the third trimester and construction costs for shelters, showers and latrines. ■ UNHCR relocated 1,232 Burundian refugees from transit centres to Mulongwe settlement between 1 and 17 September. Upon arrival, they were given non-food item (NFI) kits, and were temporarily hosted in common dormitories. They will be allocated plots of land and given cash and shelter kits. The relocation, which had been on hold due to funding constraints, eased the situation in overcrowded transit centres.
    [Show full text]