Roman Club System Since Publication of the Book
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Last Updated July 2020 Changes from Last Version Highlighted in Yellow Author Title Date Edition Cover Sgnd Comments
Last updated July 2020 Changes from last version highlighted in yellow Author Title Date Edition Cover Sgnd Comments ANON THE LAWS OF ROYAL AUCTION BRIDGE 1914 1st Card Small, stitched booklet with red covers ABERN Wendell & FIELDER Jarvis BRIDGE IS A CONTACT SPORT 1995 1st Card ABRAHAMS Gerald BRAINS IN BRIDGE 1962 1st No DW Ditto 1962 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library "A C B" AUCTION BRIDGE FOR BEGINNERS AND OTHERS 1929 Rev ed No DW ACKERSLEY Chris THE BRIDGING OF TROY 1986 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ADAMS J R DEFENCE AT AUCTION BRIDGE 1930 1st No DW AINGER Simon SIMPLE CONVENTIONS FOR THE ACOL SYSTEM 1995 1st Card ALBARRAN Pierre & JAIS Pierre HOW TO WIN AT RUBBER BRIDGE 1961 1st UK No DW Ditto 1961 1st UK DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ALDER Philip YOU CAN PLAY BRIDGE 1983 1st Card 1st was hb ALLEN David THE PHONEY CLUB The Cleveland Club System 1992 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library Ditto 1992 1st DW AMSBURY Joe BRIDGE: BIDDING NATURALLY 1979 1st DW Ditto 1979 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ANDERTON Philip BRIDGE IN 20 LESSONS 1961 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library Ditto 1961 1st DW PLAY BRIDGE 1967 1st DW Ditto 1967 1st DW Ex-G C H Fox Library ARKELL Reginald BRIDGE WITHOUT SIGHS 1934 2nd No DW Ditto 1934 2nd No dw ARMSTRONG, Len The Final Deal 1995 1st Paper AUHAGEN Ulrich DAS GROBE BUCH VOM BRIDGE 1973 1st DW Ex-Rixi Markus Library with compliment slip "BADSWORTH" BADSWORTH ON BRIDGE 1903 1st Boards Ex-G C H Fox Library aeg BADSWORTH ON BRIDGE 1903 1st Boards Aeg; IN PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE AUCTION BRIDGE AND ROYAL AUCTION 1913 2nd Boards BAILEY Alan ABRIDGED -
What Is a “Short Club” and Why Should You Avoid It? Curt Soloff
What is a “short club” and why should you avoid it? Curt Soloff Bridge has a lexicon of its own, and at times the semantics become rather confusing. Fortunately, we can turn to ACBL and its convention card/alert chart standards for official definitions of terms that players often misunderstand. For this article, I have selected the “short club” as the topic of exploration. I am piggybacking this column on the recent Bridge Bulletin article by Larry Cohen (February 2017 issue, p. 32). In the Standard American and 2/1 Game Forcing systems that predominate U.S. clubs and tournaments, it is common to open 1♣ with as few as three clubs. Doing so is a necessity of the five card major system and is seldom problematic, since our emphasis ultimately lies in trying to play in a major suit or no-trump. That said, we still need some structure associated with our minor suits for the times we do want to play our contracts there, be they partscores, games, or slams. Cohen’s article, which focus on the 1♦ opening, reviews the standard practice of opening 1♦ when we are 4-4 in the minors but 1♣ when we are 3-3 in the minors. Many players have asked me over the years why we bid this way, and Cohen answers the question well: following this standard means that our 1♦ opening nearly promises (close to 97% of the time) a four card suit. When a major fit cannot be found, the responder can comfortably take a preference to diamonds with just four card support because it is safe to assume an eight card (or better) fit. -
Nykyaikaisia Tarjouskonventioita Kauko Koistinen
Nykyaikaisia tarjouskonventioita Kauko Koistinen (Artikkelit julkaistu Bridge-lehdessä 90-luvulla.) Sisällysluettelo Multi 2♦ _________________________________________________________________________________2 Two-suiter avaukset 2♥, 2♠, 2NT ____________________________________________________________5 Stenberg 2NT_____________________________________________________________________________7 Splinter _________________________________________________________________________________10 Negatiivinen kahdennus ___________________________________________________________________12 Roman Key Card Blackwood_______________________________________________________________14 Kontrollitarjoukset (cue-tarjoukset) _________________________________________________________16 Vapaa 5NT ______________________________________________________________________________18 Michael’s Cue ja Unusual NT ______________________________________________________________20 Ghestem ________________________________________________________________________________22 Crowhurst ______________________________________________________________________________24 Lebensohl _______________________________________________________________________________26 Responsiiviset kahdennukset _______________________________________________________________29 Erilaisia sangipuolustuksia_________________________________________________________________32 Sos-vastakahdennus ______________________________________________________________________36 Drury __________________________________________________________________________________38 -
OCBL Open League: ROUND 7
OCBL JOURNAL Issue N. 23. Tuesday, 26 January, 2021 OCBL OPEN LEAGUE OCBL Open League: ROUND 7. 21.30 CET / 15.30 EST GROUP A Round 7 English Juniors VS Aus 1 Black VS Skeidar Bridge42 VS Goodman Moss VS Ireland Goded VS Mikadinho Turkish Delight VS Skalman GROUP B Sugi VS Harris Fredin VS Salvo Lupoveloce VS Ferguson Lebowitz VS Orca Denmark VS Bishel Fasting VS France Sud GROUP C Palma VS Alexander Norwegian Amazones VS BridgeScanner Leslie VS McIceberg VUGRAPH De Botton VS Seligman Koeppel VS Amateurs Amalgamated VS De Michelis The seventh round of the OCBL Open League will be played today. The OCBL JOURNAL The vugraph match will also be broadcast on Twitch! Today's commentators are Liam Milne and Magnus Olafsson (pictured in your MAILBOX above). Enjoy the show by connecting to the WBT Twitch channel at 21.30 CET / 15.30 EST: https://www.twitch.tv/worldbridgetour Send us your up-to-date pic, please! It has been a long time since many of us last met and we are doing our best to make your online Bridge experience as valuable as we can. Obviously when producing Bridge articles it is Would you like receiving the necessary OCBL Daily Journal to use photos from the archives, as the last Christian Bakke, Norway international face-to-face Bridge event was held by e-mail for free? several months ago (the 2020 Winter Games in Monaco). Since online play is at the moment our new ‘present’, we would like to represent it as Just drop your e-mail address here: it is! So if you can please send us a picture (can be a selfie) of yourself playing online https://ocbl.org/journal/ Bridge. -
Bidding Notes
Bidding Notes Paul F. Dubois February 19, 2015 CONTENTS 1 Preliminaries 6 1.1 How to Use This Book.....................................6 1.2 Casual Partners.........................................7 1.3 Acknowledgments.......................................7 1.4 Notation and Nomenclature...................................7 1.5 The Captain Concept......................................8 2 Hand Evaluation 9 2.1 Basic System..........................................9 2.1.1 Adjusting to the Auction................................ 10 2.1.2 Losing Trick Count................................... 10 2.2 Bergen Method......................................... 11 2.3 Examples............................................ 11 2.4 What Bid To Open....................................... 11 3 Reverses 13 3.1 Reverses by Opener....................................... 13 3.1.1 Responding To Opener’s Reverse........................... 13 3.2 Reverses By Responder..................................... 14 4 Opening Notrump 15 4.1 How To Choose A Response To 1N.............................. 15 4.1.1 Responding With No Major Suit Or Long Minor................... 16 4.1.2 Responding With A Major Suit Or Long Minor.................... 16 4.2 Stayman Convention...................................... 16 4.3 Major Transfers......................................... 17 4.3.1 When the transfer is doubled or overcalled...................... 18 4.3.2 Interference before transfers.............................. 19 4.4 When Responder Is 5-4 In The Majors............................ -
Germany Wins World Women's Title
No 18 July 1995 - June 1996 Editor: Panos Gerontopoulos GERMANY WINS WORLD WOMENS TITLE VETERAN USA TEAM REGAINS OPEN TITLE AS EUROPE FAILS TO MAKE IT TO THE FINAL FRANCE TAKES BRONZE MEDAL IN BOTH SERIES After two consecutive victories in 1991 and 1993, Europe lost the world open title to the United States, but regained the womens title thanks to the German team. IN THIS ISSUE NEW EBL PRESIDENT n Editorial . 2 n 1995 World Championships: A.BOEKHORST DIES Germany brings Venice Cup to n The 1996 World Bridge Team Europe, while USA returns Ber- SHORTLY AFTER Olympiad will be held in Rhodes, muda Bowl to America . 8-9 ELECTION Greece, in October . 2 n Interview with Paul Chemla of n 1995 PHILIP MORRIS Europe- France - Europes top Master an Mixed Championships will Points holder. 10 take place in Monte Carlo, March André Boekhorst who was unan- 18-23 . 3 imously elected EBL President n Poland sweeps medals in 1995 PHILIP MORRIS European n EBL team in Japan. 3 in Vilamoura died three days Open and Senior Pairs Champion- later. Bill Pencharz is acting in n Letter from the Acting Presi- ships . 11 his place until the new election, dent . 4 which is scheduled for March. n British and Israelis win PHILIP n Radical changes in EBL MORRIS Simultaneous. 11 administration . 5 n 1995 European Champion- n Panos Gerontopoulos is 1995 ships: Italy captures open title, ITALY: EUROPEAN OPEN CHAMPION Bridge Personality of the Year . 5 while France wins Ladies series and Poland dominates inaugural Italy won the Open series at the 1995 European Champion- n President André Boekhorst senior event . -
ARTIFICIAL STRONG TWO CLUB OPENING (Part 1)
ARTIFICIAL STRONG TWO CLUB OPENING (Part 1) In nineties lot of people who played duplicate bridge in Delhi were playing either Precision system or Strong Club with semi strong Diamond. But today the scenario is totally different. Most of the people have switched over to Standard American and very few pairs are playing Precision. For the benefit of all Standard system lovers we would discuss artificial strong 2C opening bid in this bulletin. In early days of bridge, opening suit bids at the two level used to show very strong unbalanced hand almost forcing to game. These bids occurred infrequently and also occupied four bids. Therefore today most of the bridge players use only one bid for all these i.e. 2C opening bid. The Artificial Strong Two Club Opening was devised and introduced by Mr. David Bruce, who was known as Mr. David Burnstine, of Los Angeles. The forcing 2C opening bid is an artificial bid used to show a very strong hand which normally assures game although the bidding may stop in a partscore. Now a days forcing 2C is widely used as it frees the other two level bids for more frequent conventional bids (e.g. weak two, multi 2D, Ekrens, Flannery etc.) and also can accurately describe strong balanced hands. 2C bid can be made on any of the following types of hand: . 22+ HCP balanced hand. Nearly game forcing unbalanced hand in any suit with minimum 8-9 tricks. A) Responses after 2C Opening: There are various systems of responding to 2C Opening. These are: . -
A Guide to Standard American Bidding Methods in Contract Bridge Jacob
A guide to Standard American bidding methods in contract bridge Jacob Richey I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it. { Morpheus, The Matrix The theory of bidding in contract bridge can seem daunting. The `rules' of bidding are easy for the beginner to forget, and easier still to misremember, since each decision in a bridge auction depends both on one's own card holding and all previous bids (including pass!) One can make due by memorizing how the simpler types of auctions go, and then when things get into unfamiliar ter- ritory, applying general bidding philosophy points, such as `new suits are forcing,' `slow shows/fast denies,' `bit cautiously with a misfit, and aggressively with a fit,’ `when in doubt, bid 3NT,' and of course, `six diamonds always makes.' But that approach misses a crucial point. Bridge is a team game, not a free for all; our bids are not for us, they are for our partner! The main goal is to communicate to partner as much important information as we can as fast as possible, and our bids are the only words we can use. (No hand signals allowed.) We still have to know the basic bidding conventions, to make sure that we are speaking the same language as our partner. Each bid we make should be telling partner about our hand or what contract we think is best, and we must interpret partner's bidding as his best attempt to do the same. -
Objective Criteria to Select a Convention
Objective criteria to select a convention Besides pre-emptive bids at 3 or 4 level , we have at our disposal only 10 opening bids, from 1. to 2 NT , to describe all possible hands we might have . How many different kind of hands could there be ? Here start the bad news … One suited hands are 4 , 2 suited hands 6 , 3 suited hands 4 plus , finally , 1 balanced hand . Hands can not be defined only according to their shape , point count is also a discriminating factor . We have therefore to take into account at least 3 point ranges : weak , medium and strong . The total will add up to something over 40 different kind of hands to be described with only 10 opening bids . The first consequence of such consideration , is that we have to give up the ambition , if we had any, to open one specific type of hand with one specific bid. We have to live with the fact that 1 bid will have to describe a little group of hands and not a single specific hand. With more than 40 different hands and only 10 opening bids , we can not do otherwise. In building up a bidding system , we will have to assign to each bid a little group of hands , so that all possible hands are covered.. Each bid will therefore have a different meaning , according to the bidding system used . Existing bidding systems are quite a few and conventions or treatments are even more numerous . How to choose among the abundant offer available in literature ? How to make an objective selection among the various available alternatives ? In order to be able to take a sound decision , we need objective criteria . -
Standard American System Notes Noble Shore
Standard American System Notes Noble Shore Pages Definitions 2 1NT opening 3-10 1H/S openings 11-14 1D/C openings 15-18 Weak openings 19-21 Strong openings 22-23 Overcalls 24-25 Takeout Doubles 26-27 Slam Bidding 28-29 Carding 30 Sample ACBL Convention Cards 31-32 Index of Conventions 33 Author’s Note 34 Definitions A balanced hand contains no singletons or voids and at most one doubleton. Points refer to a total value of a hand, including shape. HCP refers only to a hand’s high-card points. A natural suited bid shows 4+ cards in its suit. A natural notrump bid shows a desire to play in notrump. A non-natural bid is called an artificial bid. A convention is a commonly used artificial bid that has been given a name. Conventions are not part of Standard American, but many are commonly or nearly-universally played. A forcing bid demands a bid from partner if the next opponent passes. A forcing bid is also known as one- round-forcing. A signoff is a bid that strongly requests a pass or correction to another suit shown by the player signing off. Partner normally may not make a bid in any suit not shown by the signing-off player. A signoff usually occurs when the captain of the auction places the final contract. An invitational bid communicates that the partnership should bid a game unless partner has very minimal strength for previous actions. A game-forcing bid means that the partnership cannot play any contract below 3NT. -
2004 Bridge Bulletin Index
2004 Bridge Bulletin Index ACBL BRIDGE HALL OF FAME. 2004 inductees named: Amalya Kearse, Jeff Rubens, Harold “Harry” Harkavy and Merwyn “Jimmy” Maier (Feb). Weichsel chosen for Hall of Fame (Apr). Nominations open for 2005 class (Jul, Aug, Sep). ACBL BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Minutes from the Fall 2003 meeting in New Orleans (May). Election notices (Mar, Apr, May). Reno Spring 2004 minutes (Jun). New York Summer 2004 minutes; Treasurer’s report; By-laws (Oct). Election results (Dec). ACBL CHARITY FOUNDATION. Alzheimer’s Association is 2004 grant recipient (Feb). 2004 Charity Committee appointments named (Mar). Election deadlines (Jul). District grants announced for 2005 (Nov). ACBL CHARITY GAME. Winners (Mar, Jul). ACBL CLUB DIRECTOR AND CLUB DIRECTOR UPDATE COURSES. Monthly lists. ACBL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION. Promotion (Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Sep). Election news (Aug). ACBL 49ER PAIRS. Winners (Jan). ACBL GOODWILL COMMITTEE. Kay Teal named 2004 Goodwill Member of the Year; 2004 Goodwill Committee appointments named (Mar). ACBL HONORARY MEMBER OF THE YEAR. Sidney Lazard named 2004 recipient (Jan). ACBL INSTANT MATCHPOINT GAME. Promotion (Jul, Aug, Sep). Winners (Dec). ACBL INTERNATIONAL FUND GAME. Winners (Jun, Oct, Nov). ACBL PATRON MEMBER LIST. Dec. ACBL PRESIDENT. Interview with 2004 president Bruce Reeve (Jan). ACBL TEACHER ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (TAP) SEMINARS. Monthly list. ACBL-WIDE SENIOR PAIRS. Winners (Oct.) ACE OF CLUBS. Winners of the annual masterpoint races (Apr). ADVANCED PLAYERS SECTION. Columnists Eric Kokish, Larry Cohen, Eddie Kantar, Mike Lawrence, Frank Stewart and Karen Walker. See also individual columnist listings. AMERICAN BRIDGE ASSOCIATION. Schedule of upcoming national events — monthly in Schedule of Events. AS I SEE IT. -
Does the FAA Preempt California's Authority to Determine the Validity of a Performer's Personal Management Contract? Jay E
Marquette University Law School Marquette Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2008 Does the FAA Preempt California's Authority to Determine the Validity of a Performer's Personal Management Contract? Jay E. Grenig Marquette University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/facpub Part of the Law Commons Publication Information Jay E. Grenig, Does the FAA Preempt California's Authority to Determine the Validity of a Performer's Personal Management Contract?, 35 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 180 (2008). © 2008 American Bar Association. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. Repository Citation Grenig, Jay E., "Does the FAA Preempt California's Authority to Determine the Validity of a Performer's Personal Management Contract?" (2008). Faculty Publications. Paper 358. http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/facpub/358 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARBITRATION Case Does the FAA Preempt California’s Case Authority to Determine the Validity of a atat aa Performer’s Personal Management Contract? by Jay E. Grenig GlanceGlance PREVIEW of United States Supreme Court Cases, pages 180–185. © 2008 American Bar Association.