District of

Parks and Recreation Master Plan

Photos courtesy of Houston Today This report is prepared for the sole use of the District of Houston. No representations of any kind are made by Urban Systems Ltd. or its employees to any party with whom Urban Systems Ltd. does not have a contract. Copyright 2017. PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...... i

1. OVERVIEW...... 2

1.1 Parks and Recreation Master Plan...... 2

1.2 Connection to OCP...... 3

1.3 History and Location...... 4

2. COMMUNITY PROFILE AND INPUT...... 6

2.1 Population Overview...... 6

2.2 Community Input...... 9

2.3 PRMP Objectives...... 12

2.4 PRMP Format...... 12

3. PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION...... 13

3.1 Parkland...... 13

3.2 Sports Fields...... 16

3.3 Other Park Amenities...... 17

3.4 Park Design and Construction...... 23

3.5 Trails...... 31

4. INDOOR RECREATION...... 33

4.1 Indoor Recreation Facilities and Programs...... 33

4.2 Special Events ...... 38

5. SERVICE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT...... 42

5.1 Service Delivery...... 42

6. IMPLEMENTATION...... 44

APPENDIX A: RELATED PLANS AND POLICIES

APPENDIX B: SURVEY AND FOCUS GROUP INPUT

APPENDIX C: MAPS DISTRICT OF HOUSTON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Parks and Recreation Master Plan replaces a previous plan that was prepared in 1980. It was a recommendation in the 2010 Official Community Plan to prepare a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan.

The population of Houston was 2,993 in 2016, decreasing by 4.9% since 2011. There are indications that the regional population, including Houston, will grow in the near future. Consistent with national trends, Houston’s population is getting older.

There was a significant amount of community input that helped to guide the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Community surveys were completed by 121 respondents. Focus group workshops and an open house were attended by over 20 residents.

Survey households were very active in outdoor recreation. The top outdoor activities overall were: (1) walk, hike or jog on a path or through a park, and (2) visit a park to relax, eat, play catch, etc. The survey results showed generally high satisfaction for outdoor recreation. Natural parkland, courts, skate parks, mountain bike trails, ball diamonds, soccer fields, places to walk dogs, smaller parks close to where you live, picnic facilities, and paths and trails for walking close to home all had high satisfaction ratings. Satisfaction was lower for public washrooms, boat launches, winter activities in parks, water-oriented activities, and maintenance of parks. Respondents were asked to indicate their first, second and third priorities for improvements to outdoor recreation. Of those who chose to answer, 32% said their first priority is a higher standard of maintenance of existing parks and trails.

Survey households were also active in recreation programs and activities. The highest participation was in drop-in swimming, special events, and public ice skating. Satisfaction rates were high for public ice skating and drop-in swimming. When asked if there are any age groups for which recreation programs are insufficient or lacking, the most respondents suggested that teens 13 to 18 have insufficient programs. In terms of indoor recreation facilities, the skating rink, pool and fitness centre received the highest satisfaction ratings. The facility that received the highest dissatisfaction rating was multi-purpose rooms. Respondents were asked to indicate their first, second and third priorities for improvements to indoor recreation. Of those who chose to answer, 40% said their first priority is more and/or better child and youth fitness or sports opportunities.

In keeping with Houston’s overall vision of “individual/community satisfaction with quality of life”, the following are the objectives of the PRMP:

1. Inspire people to be active and healthy 5. Foster appreciation of the parks and the by providing year-round recreation environment opportunities 6. Place a priority on maintaining and 2. Link the community with a connected upgrading existing amenities system of trails 7. Set realistic goals consistent with the 3. Offer diverse programs for people of all District’s financial resources ages, abilities, income levels and cultures 8. Position the District to work with partners 4. Build community by communicating with and to acquire funding support and involving residents and instilling pride i PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

The master plan includes a description and analysis of the District’s parks and recreation facilities and services. Recommendations are based on community input, trends and best practices, and professional assessment. The implementation table lists the recommendations, along with their proposed priority, phasing, and relative costs. The following is a summary of the recommendations in each phase:

Quick Wins • Work with community volunteers • Prepare Master Plan for site to identify any supports or across railroad from Steelhead • Replace picnic tables that are in incentives that the District could Park poor condition provide to encourage more volunteerism • Upgrade Jamie Baxter Park - • Provide distance markers along Phase 3 popular trails • Consider methods for improving maintenance • Upgrade Four Seasons Park - • Acquire some moveable play Phase 2 equipment for the Leisure Centre • Increase monitoring and • Open the pool until later in the enforcement of the dog bylaw Ongoing evening • Establish standards for • Acquire some equipment and plan Medium Term neighbourhood parks in new more dry-floor programs in the • Improve the quality of the fields at developments arena Four Seasons Park • Retain a portion of Silverthorne • Consider an assistance program • Add a fieldhouse at Four Seasons Elementary School site for a for those who need financial Park neighbourhood park if the school support is closed • Relocate the outdoor fitness • Consider more frequent equipment (see 3.4.2) • Designate specified District open exceptions to the Event space and natural areas as Regulation Bylaw for events with • Plan for a larger new dog off-leash parkland high community benefits run by area (see 3.4.2) non-profit groups • Obtain input on the planning and • Work with biking groups to design of neighbourhood parks determine the future of the bike Short Term park in Jamie Baxter Park (see • Replace playgrounds on a regular 3.4.2) basis • Decommission the ball diamond at Jamie Baxter Park (see 3.4.4) • Consider a multi-purpose court in • Upgrade existing trails in high-use Jamie Baxter Park (see 3.4.2) areas • Establish a replacement cycle for playgrounds • Prepare Master Plan for Four • Improve signage related to parks Seasons Park • Consider leasing the previous • Provide new trails within town and heritage area in Four Seasons • Prepare Master Plan for extending out from town Park to the rodeo for rodeo uses Alexandra Park and a campground • Establish better barriers and • Upgrade Jamie Baxter Park - monitoring to keep motorized • Consider a sliding scale of fees Phase 2 vehicles off District trails for use of the amphitheatre • Upgrade Four Seasons Park - • Work with teens in the community • Provide additional information on Phase 1 to identify and offer programs of the availability of the tennis courts interest • Upgrade Alexandra Park • Use design guidelines provided • Organize multiple groups to for new park construction • Consider a new multi-purpose work together on planning room for fitness classes some coordinated economic • Prepare Master Plan for Jamie development efforts Baxter Park • Provide additional information on the availability of the indoor • Upgrade Jamie Baxter Park - playground Aspirational Phase 1 • Upgrade Four Seasons Park - • Design a signage system Long Term Phase 3 • Plan for replacing the fitness • Consider re-establishing a • Build new park across railroad - equipment campground in the centre of Phase 1 Houston (see 3.4.2) • Develop a security system for • Build new park across railroad - 24/7 access to the fitness centre • Consider establishing a pond for Phase 2 skating near the centre of town (see 3.4.2) • Build new park across railroad - Phase 3 ii DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

1 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

1. OVERVIEW

1.1. Parks and Recreation Master Plan

A Parks and Recreation Master Plan was previously prepared for the District of Houston in 1980. This is the first time it has been revisited, and much has changed since that time. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan (PRMP) is a comprehensive 10-year plan to guide District staff and Council on the planning, design, and use of parks, trails, recreation facilities, programs, and events.

Houston is endowed with substantial natural amenities, including over 100 hectares (ha) of parkland, offering residents and visitors many opportunities for outdoor recreation. The District is well known for its beautiful trails, lakes, and rivers. Mountain- biking and fishing attract tourists throughout the warmer months. Houston is also home to Canada’s Largest Flyrod, located in Steelhead Park.

Three indoor facilities offer sports, recreation and fitness opportunities year-round; the Houston Leisure Facility, Claude L. Parish Memorial Arena, and the Community Hall.

Photos courtesy of Houston Today 2 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Residents of nearby communities regularly take advantage of the Leisure Facility while visiting Houston for the services it offers.

1.2. Connection to OCP

The 2010 Official Community Plan (OCP) identified the need for a Parks and Recreation Master Plan to help guide the future planning of parks, trails, and recreation facilities and services in the District. This Master Plan is consistent with the OCP’s broad community goals related to recreation, health, and economic development, and it builds on relevant objectives and policies.

Houston’s recently updated OCP, Vision 2025, is centred around individual and community satisfaction with the quality of life in the District (Figure 1.1). Two of the vision’s components, creating a healthy and caring community, and building an indoor and outdoor recreational and cultural hub, are specifically related to parks and recreation. The vision component “efficient economy” is also relevant. Houston’s population has been decreasing in recent years and the tax base has been significantly reduced due to the loss of a major forest product manufacturer. It is therefore important that the PRMP respect the economic realities of the municipality.

Highly educated/ Diversified Energy trained labour Efficient Economy force responsive to future job opportunities

INDIVIDUAL/ COMMUNITY SATISFACTION WITH QUALITY OF LIFE Compact attractive Cultural/Indoor Geothermal Energy & Outdoor heated urban core Recreation Hub

Healthy and Caring Community

Figure 1.1: Houston’s OCP Vision 2025

Additional plans and policies that are relevant to the PRMP are listed in Appendix A. 3 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

1.3. History and Location

The District of Houston is part of the Regional District of Bulkley-Nechako, nestled within the Bulkley Valley of Northwest BC. The area is within the traditional territory of the Wet’suwet’en First Nations. A significant portion of the District lies within the 200- year floodplain of the Bulkley River and Buck Creek.

Early European settler development in the area began with the construction of the Overland Telegraph Line in the 1860s. Permanent non-native settlement followed the construction of the Grand Trunk Pacific Railway in the early 1890s. The population of Houston rose in the 1950s as the post-war construction boom brought numerous small sawmills to the area.

The District was incorporated in 1957. Houston saw a major influx of residents after the Bulkley Valley Forest Products complex was built in the 1970s. Since then, the population has grown and fluctuated in response to the expansion and contraction of the region’s three major industries; forestry, mining, and agriculture. Today, tourism and pipeline transmission are also becoming important sources of economic development and jobs.

Houston is located between Prince Rupert and Prince George, 411 km and 307 km away, respectively (Figure 1.2). The Town of Smithers, 64 km to the northwest, is the largest nearby community with 5,401 residents¹. Smithers is a major shopping destination, airport and service hub for Houston residents. Likewise, some Smithers residents travel to Houston to visit the pool and some who work in Smithers are beginning to move to Houston for the lower real estate prices.

There are a number of smaller settlements within an hour’s driving time of Houston (Figure 1.2). Residents from these settlements regularly visit Houston for errands and to visit Houston’s parks and recreational facilities. Many Houston residents also work in Smithers and the surrounding area.

The railway through Houston has some passenger service, but mostly it is used for transporting goods in containers. With potential new resource development, the train frequency could increase. This has an effect on the use of parks near the railway, and on transportation routes through the community that cross the tracks.

¹ Statistics Canada, 2016. 4 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Figure 1.2: Neighbouring Communities

5 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

2. COMMUNITY PROFILE AND INPUT

2.1. Population Overview

The population of Houston was 2,993 in 2016, decreasing by 4.9% since 2011. This population decrease is likely due to the closure of the Houston Forest Products mill, which caused the loss of 225 jobs in the community. For comparison, the population of Smithers has been stable over the past five years (Figure 2.1).

Houston covers 72.94 km2 and has a population density of 41 people per square kilometre, reflective of the community’s rural character. The average household size is 2.4 persons, in line with the provincial average.

Photos courtesy of Houston Today 6 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Houston Smithers BC Population 2,993 5,401 5,648,055 Change From 2011 -4.9% -0.1 5.6%

Population 41 persons/km² 353.6 persons/km² 5.0

Average Household Size 2.4 2.3 2.4

Figure 2.1: Houston Population Comparison Source: Statistics Canada

Houston has been experiencing population decline since 1996 when it reached a peak population of 3,934 (Figure 2.2). The District’s population has historically been driven by economic opportunities in the forestry industry, particularly local sawmill operations. The population declined by 20.6% between 1996 and 2006. The population decline slowed to 5.4% between 2006 and 2016. According to BC Stats, the population for the Bulkley – Nechako region will grow by approximately 0.5% annually between 2018 and 2028. If Houston, were to get its share of that growth, the population would increase by about 15 people or 6 households over the next decade.

Figure 2.2: Houston Population, 2006 to 2016 Source: Statistics Canada

7 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

AGE DISTRIBUTION Houston has a relatively young population. In 2016, the average age was 39.2, compared to 39.8 in Smithers, and 42.3 across BC. Figure 2.3 compares Houston’s age distribution to that of Smithers and BC. The proportion of older adults in Houston is lower than the proportions in Smithers and across the province as a whole. At 27.2% of the population, the proportion of children and youth in Houston is slightly higher than in Smithers (25.0%), and much higher than the province as a whole (20.4%).

Figure 2.3: Age Groups as Proportion of Population Source: Statistics Canada

Consistent with national trends, Houston’s population is getting older. As a percentage of the total population, the proportion of residents 65 years and older grew from 15.8% in 2006 to 18.3% in 2016. The proportion of adults between the ages of 20 and 64 fell from 63.1% in 2006 to 58.8% in 2016. The proportion of children and youth 19 years of age and younger has been relatively stable over this same period. Figure 2.4 shows the shift in population from younger age groups to older ones between 2006 and 2016.

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS

Demographic trends play an important role in determining parks and recreation needs. The profile of a community influences the types of facilities and programs that may be needed to meet the needs of residents at all life stages. As the figures above show, Houston’s population is getting older. However, Houston’s average age is younger than the provincial average and the District has a high proportion of children and youth. It will therefore be incumbent on the District to consider the needs of all age groups. 8 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Figure 2.4: Houston Age Distribution, 2006 to 2016 Source: Statistics Canada

The District’s schools are currently at about 50% of their capacity, and the School District is considering closure of Silverthorne Elementary. This could potentially affect the availability of green space at that site.

Houston’s population includes a number of diverse cultures. These include people from the Philippines, South Asia, Africa and South Korea.

There are a significant number of shift workers living in Houston.They have interests in drop-in opportunities, especially for fitness, at varied times of the day.

2.2. Community Input

There was a significant amount of community input that helped to guide the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.

COMMUNITY AND YOUTH SURVEYS A community survey invited participants to share their opinions about parks, trails, and recreation facilities and programs available in the District of Houston. The full community survey was available online and through hard copy from April 24 to May 29, 2017. It was promoted through newspaper ads, posters, emails and social media, and respondents were self-selecting. An abbreviated youth survey was available from May 17 until May 24.

9 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

There were 121 survey respondents - 112 community surveys submitted and 9 youth surveys. The low response rate in youth surveys is a result of 40 youth (age 18 and under) completing the full community survey instead.

The following is a summary of the survey results. Appendix B provides additional information and the full summary is available from the District of Houston.

• Survey households are very active in outdoor recreation. The top three outdoor activities overall were: (1) walk, hike or jog on a path or through a park (88% of households had someone participate within the past year²); (2) visit a park to relax, eat, play catch, etc. (87%); and (3) visit a playground (80%).

• The most popular parks frequented by households are Steelhead Park (91% of households), Jamie Baxter Park (90%) and Duck Pond Walking Trails (84%).

• The survey results showed generally high satisfaction for outdoor recreation. Natural parkland, tennis courts, skate parks, mountain bike trails, ball diamonds, soccer fields, places to walk dogs, smaller parks close to where you live, picnic facilities, and paths and trails for walking close to home all had satisfaction ratings of 75% or more and dissatisfaction ratings of 25% or less among respondents to the questions. Public washrooms and boat launches were the only items for which satisfaction (18%, 40% respectively) was less than dissatisfaction (82%, 60%). Dissatisfaction was also relatively high for winter activities in parks (50% dissatisfied), water-oriented activities (49% dissatisfied) and maintenance of parks (48% dissatisfied). Maintenance of trails and courts also had significant numbers of people dissatisfied.

• The most common comments related to outdoor recreation satisfaction pertained to issues with existing public washrooms / the need for more public washrooms, and concerns regarding litter and general maintenance issues in parks and along trails.

• Respondents were asked to indicate their first, second and third priorities for improvements to outdoor recreation. Of those who chose to answer, 32% said their first priority is a higher standard of maintenance of existing parks and trails.

• Survey households are active in recreation programs and activities. The highest participation was in drop-in swimming (81% of households), special events (63%) and public ice skating (54%). Households with children living at home had higher participation rates in most programs and activities, with the highest participation in drop-in swimming (85% of households with children), public ice skating (66%) and special events (66%). On average, 66% of households without children said they have not taken part in recreation programs or activities.

• Satisfaction rates for recreation programs were high among those participating, with satisfaction the highest for public ice skating (93% of those responding) and drop-in swimming (93%). For three of the eight programs, 50% or more of respondents said they have no experience and cannot rate the item.

² Read all participation responses like this unless indicated otherwise. 10 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

• Respondents were asked whether they believe there are any age groups for which recreation programs are insufficient or lacking. A high number of respondents, 46%, said they were not sure. Of those responding, 65% (35 respondents) said teens 13 to 18 have insufficient programs, and 37% (20 respondents) said there are insufficient programs for youth aged 6 to 12.

• Regarding use of indoor recreation facilities, 68% of households who provided a response to this question visited the Houston Leisure Facility, 63% visited the Claude Parish Memorial Arena, and 49% visited the Houston Community Hall in the past 12 months.

• The skating rink, pool and fitness centre received the highest satisfaction ratings (93%, 91% and 91% of respondents, respectively). The facility that received the highest dissatisfaction rating was the multi-purpose rooms at 33% (satisfaction for that facility was 67%.)

• Respondents were asked to indicate their first, second and third priorities for improvements to indoor recreation. Of those who chose to answer, 40% said their first priority is more and/or better child and youth fitness or sports opportunities.

• The top three comments regarding priorities for indoor recreation facilities included increase sports and fitness opportunities for youth (11 comments), improve drop-in sports offerings (10 comments), and increase the number of indoor play areas (e.g., playground, climbing wall, park, walking/running track (10 comments).

In the youth survey, respondents were asked to indicate their favourite outdoor and indoor activities. In terms of outdoor recreation, the top three favourite activities among youth respondents are camping (88% of respondents), play on a ball diamond (75%) and attend a festival or special event in a park and play on a sports field (e.g., soccer, rugby) (63% respectively). The top three favourite indoor activities are hockey, figure skating, or ringette (88% of respondents), public ice skating (75%) and drop-in swimming (63%).

Youth survey respondents were asked to indicate if there is anything the District of Houston could do in parks and recreation to make people their age happier. The answers provided are listed below:

• Add more events for teenagers

• Make sure fields are ready!

• More fun stuff

11 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

FOCUS GROUPS AND OPEN HOUSE One open house and three workshops were held in May 2017. The purposes of these engagement sessions were as follows:

• inform participants about the project

• collect information about what residents like and dislike about parks and recreation in Houston

• gather input to help generate objectives and recommendations for the Master Plan

All input collected during the sessions was documented and is presented in Appendix B. The workshop input was generally consistent with the information obtained from the surveys. The objectives in the next section are based directly on the input received from the focus groups.

2.3. PRMP Objectives

In keeping with Houston’s overall vision of “individual/community satisfaction with quality of life”, the following are the objectives of the PRMP:

9. Inspire people to be active and healthy by providing year-round recreation opportunities

10. Link the community with a connected system of trails

11. Offer diverse programs for people of all ages, abilities, income levels and cultures

12. Build community by communicating with and involving residents and instilling pride

13. Foster appreciation of the parks and the environment

14. Place a priority on maintaining and upgrading existing amenities

15. Set realistic goals consistent with the District’s financial resources

16. Position the District to work with partners and to acquire funding support

2.4. PRMP Format

The following sections address the various facilities and programs that form Houston’s municipal parks and recreation services. Each section includes a description of existing conditions, an analysis of the strengths and challenges, and recommendations for the future. Some of the recommendations are priorities for implementation, and others are future aspirations that will be subject to the availability of resources. The proposed phasing and relative costs are identified in section 6. 12 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

3. PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION

3.1. Parkland

DESCRIPTION

Parks The District has 15 parks plus access to two school fields, totally 131.7 ha in parkland. Figure 3.1 summarizes the District’s parkland inventory.

The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to parkland supply and parks in general. Recommendations for the design and upgrading of specific parks are addressed in section 3.5.

13 Photos courtesy of Houston Today PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

Park Type Park Name Area (ha) Jamie Baxter Park 7.65 Four Seasons Park 27.69 Steelhead Park 4.01 Multi-use Parks By-Mac Park 41.73 Northside Park 3.04 Total 84.13 Avalon Park 0.30 Hagman Park 0.10 Nadina Park 0.20 Neighbourhood Parks Newgard Park 0.32 Ruiter Heights Park 0.33 Total 0.93 Duck Pond Walking Trails 8.20 Irrigation Lake 26.64 Alexandra Park (undevel- 5.15 Natural Outdoor Parks & oped) Green Spaces Walker Road Park 0.37 Northwood Picnic Site 1.30 Total 41.55 Houston Secondary 3.91 School Fields Silverthorne Elementary 1.19 Total 5.10 All Parks 131.71 Figure 3.1: Parkland Inventory

14 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

ANALYSIS

Strengths Challenges The District has a large quantity of When new developments occur parkland for its size and population in the District, it will be important for the developments to offer new neighbourhood parks within walking dis- tance of residents Residents are particularly satisfied with Residents requested a neighbourhood Steelhead Park and Jamie Baxter Parks, park in the Buck Flats area which have very high levels of visitation by residents Residents have high satisfaction with Northwood Picnic Site is the least visited natural parkland park The District owns a number of parcels of The District does not currently have the natural land and open space that some resources for developing new parkland residents would like to see designated as parkland Silverthorne Elementary School may be closed, which could result in a reduction of open space in the centre of town

RECOMMENDATIONS

3.1.1Establish standards that require major new development areas to provide neighbourhood parks of at least 0.3 ha located within 400 metres (a 5-minute walk) of all new residents.

• ­Require parks to have some relatively level space suitable for a play area, with frontage on at least one road, and amenities including a park name sign, play equipment, two benches, a garbage can, and a grass area for informal play at a minimum, with other amenities to be determined through input from the community.

• ­If additional development occurs in the Buck Flats area, consider opportunities for a new neighbourhood park to serve existing and future residents

3.1.2 If Silverthorne Elementary School is closed, work with the School District to retain a portion of it as a neighbourhood park.

3.1.3 Work towards the eventual designation of the following properties as parks:

• ­Site across the railway from Steelhead Park

• Riparian areas along the Bulkley River extending west and south from Northside Park along the river to Rail Street

• ­Parcel southeast of Jamie Baxter Park 15 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

3.2. Sports Fields

DESCRIPTION The District’s inventory of sports fields includes three usable ball diamonds and two soccer fields, as shown in Figure 3.2. The District has an agreement with School District No. 54 for the use of sports fields at Houston Secondary and Silverthorne Elementary. School fields are booked through the School District, and there is minimal use of them by community leagues.

Park Number Condition Bookable Four Seasons Park 2 ball diamonds Fair, poor 2 soccer fields drainage, sinkholes Yes at sprinkler heads Yes Northside Park 1 ball diamond Fair, undersized Yes Undersized, balls Jamie Baxter Park 1 diamond go onto road Yes (for under 10) Poor, booked for Houston Secondary 1 soccer field U10 Yes Silverthorne Poor, booked for Elementary 1 soccer field U10 Yes

Figure 3.2: Sports Field Inventory

The ball diamond in Jamie Baxter Park is not booked due to its proximity to Mountainview Drive. Players who informally use this ball diamond regularly hit balls onto the road, which is a major driving hazard. The school fields are not in good condition.

Softball and soccer are the games played most in Houston. Figure 3.3 shows the numbers of players that use the sports fields for practices and tournaments.Adult softball folded, but the youth softball league is increasing in size. There is a major adult ball tournament annually on the May long weekend.

Softball is happy that all of their use is now at Four Seasons Park. Soccer currently plays at Four Seasons Park and on school fields; they would like all of their play to be at Four Seasons Park.

League Number of Participants Houston Minor Softball 70 Bulkley Valley Soccer Association 130

Figure 3.3: Sports Field Users

16 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to sports fields.

Strengths Challenges Four Seasons Park is becoming the Concerns were expressed about the District’s key athletic park condition of school fields, and the maintenance at all fields, including Four Seasons Park Bulkley Valley Soccer Association 130

RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning (capital recommendations for these items are in section 3.5) 3.2.1 Improve the quality of the fields at Four Seasons Park.

3.2.2 Add a fieldhouse at Four Seasons Park.

• Include washrooms, concession, First Aid room, and meeting room in the fieldhouse as the population increases.

3.2.3 Decommission the ball diamond at Jamie Baxter Park as part of upgrading the park.

3.3. Other Park Amenities

Playgrounds Houston has playgrounds in most of its multi-use parks and some of the neighbourhood parks (Figure 3.4). Many of the playgrounds are old or beginning to age.

There is a new accessible playground with a rubber safety surface at Twain Sullivan School. This was funded by a grant obtained by the Parent Advisory Committee. Some respondents to the community survey requested more play opportunities for very young children and a spray park.

Park Name Type of Playground Condition of Playground Avalon Park Young children Average Northside Park Young children Average Steelhead Park All ages Good Jamie Baxter Park Older children Poor Hagman Park Young children Average Ruiter Heights Young children Average

Figure 3.4: Playground Inventory 17 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

Outdoor Fitness Equipment In 2014, the District installed outdoor fitness equipment along the river trail directly across the bridge from the Houston Leisure Facility, near the Seniors Activity Centre. This equipment offers exercises for rehabilitation and strength training, using body weight for resistance on some machines and no resistance on others. It is reported to have a low amount of use.

Amphitheatre An amphitheatre is located within Jamie Baxter Park. It is in good condition and a source of pride for residents. However, it is currently not used as much as residents think it should be. Residents indicated that some user groups may face barriers related to cost and liability that prevent them from booking events at the amphitheatre.

Picnic Areas and Shelters Picnic areas are located at By-Mac Park, Steelhead Park, Northside Park, Jamie Baxter Park, Nadina Park, Northwood Picnic Site, Irrigation Lake, and Houston Community Forest. By-Mac Park also has a picnic shelter. Residents commented that many of the picnic tables in parks need to be replaced.

Washrooms The District maintains washrooms (outhouses) at a number of parks. The District is installing new washrooms at four parks in 2017: Jamie Baxter Park (2 washrooms), Four Seasons Park, Northwood Picnic Site and By-Mac Park. There are also washrooms at Steelhead Park that are in good condition. As residents were very dissatisfied with the washrooms when the community survey was conducted, this effort should be welcomed.

Dog Off-leash Area The only dog off-leash area in Houston is the dog run at Steelhead Park. This area is well-used by visitors, and to some degree by residents; however, it is very small. Survey participants requested a larger dog off-leash area in a more central location like Jamie Baxter Park. In addition to providing social and health benefits to residents and dogs, off-leash areas can help to bring more people to parks where there is vandalism and inappropriate uses.

Skate Park A skate park is located within Jamie Baxter Park. The skate park is in fair condition and is well used.

18 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Bike Skills Park A bike skills park is located within Jamie Baxter Park but is not maintained by the District. In the past, it may have been maintained by user groups, but now it is in poor condition and reportedly does not meet the needs of local users. While BMX and four-cross are popular bike sports in Houston, this bike skills park was not built to accommodate those activities. It therefore receives fairly low use.

Tennis Courts Two tennis courts are located on the grounds of Houston Secondary School. These were built by the District and the School District in a 50/50 cost sharing arrangement to replace tennis courts that were previously where the aquatic centre was built. Some members of the community do not realize that the courts are available for public use.

Basketball Courts The only District basketball courts in Houston are in Ruiter Heights Park, and they are in poor condition. There also some courts at Houston Secondary School. Respondents to the survey expressed interest in a good basketball court in a central location such as Jamie Baxter Park. Many communities build multi-purpose courts that can be used for basketball as well as roller hockey, ball hockey, children on tricycles/small bikes, etc. Pickleball is also an activity with increasing interest. The seniors in Houston play pickleball indoors; a multi-purpose outdoor court that also supports pickleball could help to encourage more seniors to be outdoors.

Running Track A dirt running track is located on the grounds of Houston Secondary. It is reported to be in poor condition.

Heritage Features There are two parks that contain protected heritage features. Four Seasons Park includes a fenced area which houses the old heritage museum pavilion, a log house, and a barn. The museum closed when the organization operating it disbanded a number of years ago, and the area is not accessible to the public. Several heritage buildings from this site were moved to Steelhead Park where they attract considerable visitation by tourists.

Equestrian Activities The District has a rodeo arena and riding ring at Four Seasons Park that hosts horseback-riding practices and special events, including the annual Pleasant Valley Days Rodeo and Ball Tournament. The Pleasant Valley Horse Club is the primary group that 19 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

uses these facilities; they operate and maintain the rodeo groups. There are a number of active equestrians in the community who use the rodeo grounds and District trails.

Camping Areas There are nine unserviced campsites located at By-Mac Park; the park is used almost exclusively for fishing and it is managed by the District. A Committee was established in 2016 to prepare recommendations on the revitalization of park amenities and the campgrounds.

There was previously a campground at the south end of Jamie Baxter Park, but it is now closed. Community members expressed interest in re-establishing a campground in the centre of Houston.

Community Garden and Farmer’s Market There is a community garden across from Northside Park; it is owned by the District and leased to an organization called Link-to-Learning. A popular farmer’s market is held from June 1 - September 30, from 10:00 am - 3:00pm, in Steelhead Park.

Boat Launch By-Mac Park offers boat launch opportunities; a number of residents indicated that it needs upgrading. The OCP identifies a plan to dredge the boat launch every two years. A committee was established in 2016 to prepare recommendations to Council on the relocation of the boat launch in order to reduce maintenance costs and to rehabilitate the boat launch, along with other park amenities.

Outdoor Skating There are currently no outdoor rinks provided by the District. In the past, the sports box at Ruiter Heights Park was flooded for skating. Residents expressed interest in more winter activities in parks.

Nature Interpretation There are some interpretive signs at the Duck Pond, though these are aging and they have been subject to some vandalism. There are few other interpretive materials in the District, and many opportunities.

The Streamkeeper’s group in Houston is working to build a Nature Centre north of Highway 16 and Tweedie Avenue near the Bulkley River riparian area. The group has been working on bird and aquatic/invertebrate studies on the wetland. 20 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

The Northside Park area contains some Cottonwood Riverine habitat, which is an endangered ecosystem. This is an excellent interpretive opportunity.

Amenities Linked to Tourism Many tourists visit Houston for the recreation opportunities, including outstanding fishing, hiking, and mountain biking. Multiple residents made comments about attracting tourists into Houston, with some ideas including camping in town, trails linking to mountain biking areas, and a display board of opportunities at Steelhead Park. The Mt. Harry Davis Recreation Site just north of the town is a key tourist attraction for mountain biking, and it also supports hiking, snowshoeing, and Nordic skiing.

ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to amenities in parks. Items that are not mentioned below are generally acceptable as they are.

Strengths Challenges There are two good, relatively new A number of the playgrounds are playgrounds in Houston outdated and in poor condition There are outdoor swimming opportunities at Irrigation Lake The District does not have a spray park Outdoor fitness equipment is a valuable Use of the outdoor fitness equipment is asset low The amphitheatre is an excellent community asset Use of the amphitheatre could be higher Picnic tables were reported to be in poor Residents enjoy using the picnic facilities condition in many parks (quite a few were in parks replaced in 2017 with more to be done) Dissatisfaction with public outdoor The District installed new outdoor washrooms was very high, but is washrooms in four parks in 2017 hopefully reduced The dog off-leash area in Steelhead Park Residents requested a larger dog off- is well used by tourists leash area The bike skills park is in poor condition The District has a bike skills park and does not meet the needs of those who might be interested in using it The District has two fairly good tennis Some members of the community are not courts aware that these are public courts The District has some valuable heritage features in Steelhead Park that can be Heritage features in Four Seasons Park visited by the public are not available for public appreciation Residents and tourists enjoy camping at There is no campground in the centre of By-Mac Park for fishing Houston Houston has a climate suitable for outdoor skating and residents have There are currently no outdoor skating interest in more winter activities in parks rinks 21 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

There are not many interpretive signs in Residents appreciate the interpretive relation to the natural features, and some signs that exist of the signs need to be replaced The District has not yet realized the There are many tourists who pass potential opportunities to obtain more through Houston economic benefit from tourism There are no good basketball courts, and residents requested these

RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning (capital recommendations for these items are in section 3.5) 3.3.1 Establish a replacement cycle for playgrounds, with Jamie Baxter Park as the top priority.

3.3.2 Relocate the outdoor fitness equipment within Jamie Baxter Park to make it more visible and closer to the Seniors Activity Centre.

3.3.3 Plan for a larger, new dog off-leash area, potentially as part of the Jamie Baxter Park upgrading.

3.3.4 Work with local biking groups to determine their interest in helping to design, build and maintain an improved bike park in Jamie Baxter Park.

3.3.5 Consider re-establishing a campground in the centre of Houston.

­ Consider re-establishing a campground in Jamie Baxter Park

­ Consider a campground in Four Seasons Park that could be used for the rodeo, sports tournaments, and by tourists. (The District is planning a lease

3.3.6 Consider a multi-purpose court in Jamie Baxter Park that can be used for basketball, pickleball, and other activities.

3.3.7 Consider leasing the previous heritage area in Four Seasons Park to the rodeo for rodeo uses and a campground.

3.3.8 Consider establishing a pond for skating near the centre of town.

­ Consider a pond in the space across from Steelhead Park (need to fence along railway) that can be used for skating.

­ In the interim, consider flooding an area in Jamie Baxter (on sport court).

22 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Management 3.3.9 Consider a sliding scale of fees for use of the amphitheatre to encourage more use by community groups, e.g., music in the park on summer evenings.

3.3.10 Provide additional information to notify the community that the tennis courts are available and free for public use outside of school hours.

3.4. Park Design and Construction

DESCRIPTION Houston’s parks have been developed over the years in an ad hoc manner without the benefit of planning processes or professional involvement. Most of the parks function well and have attractive characteristics. Others have significant opportunities for upgrading. The District does not currently have design guidelines for parks, nor processes for park planning and design.

As part of this Master Plan, three parks and one additional parcel of District land were identified as having the highest priorities for future upgrading, with needs extending beyond simple replacement of aging infrastructure. The following are some of the opportunities and potential features for those parks:

Jamie Baxter Park – see sketch concept plans in Figure 3.6

• Old campground at south end may have an opportunity to be redeveloped, and likely managed by a private contractor. Bank stability and insurance considerations need investigation.

• Design features and ideas:

* remove central parking area near the ball diamond

* provide a perimeter loop trail

* add a multi-purpose sports court

* relocate exercise equipment into the park closer to the Seniors Activity Centre

* add a dog off-leash area – potential options include in the campground area, if there will not be a new campground or where the ball diamond is now

* revitalize the bike park

* build a new playground, potentially including some spray park features

23 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

Four Seasons Park– see sketch concept plans in Figure 3.7

• Organize the parking area with a defined circulation system and parking stall layout

• Improve the sports fields

• Build a fieldhouse

• Give the rodeo a lease to the previous heritage area for use of the building and for development of a campground to serve the rodeo, sports events, and tourists

• Consider a shelter that could be used for picnics

Alexandra Park – see sketch concept plans in Figure 3.8

• Regrade the area, keeping some topography and the tailing pond, and re- establish native vegetation (cottonwoods plus), potentially including some pond/ wetland features, as well as some grass areas with picnic tables and possibly a picnic shelter (locate any major features on higher ground due to flooding)

• Provide a loop trail system that can be used by the many pedestrians in the area, with an interpretive component that provides information on the geothermal field and habitat features;

Across railroad from Steelhead Park – see sketch concept plans in Figure 3.9

• Regrade the area to incorporate stormwater management ponds, including a pond feature that could be used for skating in winter and fishing in summer

• Include a loop trail system, seating and picnic areas, and a historic building as a warm-up hut / fishing shack

The following are some other potential upgrades to parks:

• Houston Leisure Facility - add planting to the area outside the fitness centre windows

ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to park design.

Strengths Challenges Many of the District’s parks are naturally There are no guidelines for park planning attractive and design Residents are fairly happy with the Some of the parks have much greater existing parks potential to serve the community Residents cited Jamie Baxter Park and Duck Pond as important parks that need upgrading 24

DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning 3.4.1 Use the following design guidelines for new park construction:

Use universal design principles to welcome all park visitors, including some pathway loops that are fully accessible, especially in major parks.

Encourage neighbourhood parks to be designed as gathering places, with seating and spaces appropriate for picnics and group activities.

Design parks with the goal of increasing creativity and interest, e.g., more interactive play environments and equipment, allow children to experience more nature in parks, provide more options for young children.

Consider contemporary approaches to playground design that include natural materials, topography, creative elements, features for all ages of children, and some accessible structures. Through use of natural materials, costs of purchasing playground equipment can be reduced.

For parks that include parking areas, design the parking efficiently, minimize the amount of hard (or gravel) surface, and keep the parking as close to the perimeter of the park as possible.

Plant trees in parks to the degree possible for shade and as a contribution to the urban forest.

Use Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles, balancing these with the need to protect and enhance habitats.

Provide seating in all parks and along multi-use trails.

When planning new parks, consider life cycle cost analysis and energy consumption.

Design parks with consideration for protection and enhancement of environmental resources and rainwater/stormwater infiltration where possible.

Acknowledge First Nations culture in park design and signage where possible.

Celebrate local artists in parks, with more public art such as murals, mosaics, and sculptures.

29 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

3.4.2 Prepare Master Plans for Houston’s parks that have significant opportunities for improvement – Jamie Baxter Park, Four Seasons Park, Alexandra Park, and across the railroad from Steelhead Park.

­Prepare Master Plans for upgrading these parks with community input ideally at three stages: to establish the vision and program, to review design options, and to provide input on the final plan

3.4.3 Obtain input from user groups and the community on the planning and design of neighbourhood parks.

Capital Development 3.4.4 Upgrade Jamie Baxter Park, with potential phases as follows.

­ Phase 1 – playground, new trails

­ Phase 2 – relocate parking and fitness equipment, add sports court and dog off-leash area

­ Phase 3 – renovate campground area

3.4.5 Upgrade Four Seasons Park, with potential phases as follows.

­ Phase 1 – improve parking area

­ Phase 2 – rehabilitate fields

­ Phase 3 – fieldhouse

3.4.6 Upgrade Alexandra Park.

­ Trails, picnic area, revegetation

3.4.7 Build a park at the site across the railway from Steelhead Park, with potential phases as follows.

­ Phase 1 – pond

­ Phase 2 – loop trails and picnic area

­ Phase 3 – building

3.4.8 Replace picnic tables that are in poor condition. 30 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

3.4.9 Replace playgrounds on a regular basis.

­Assume replacement of one playground every three years, with Jamie Baxter not included in this item (accounted for in 3.4.4).

3.5. Trails

DESCRIPTION Houston has 28.5 kilometres (km) of trails in and around the town (Map 2). Most of the trails are within parks, with connecting trails along rivers, through other municipal land, and through undeveloped land. Residents living in the north and south parts of town have access to fairly extensive trail networks. Figure 3.5provides an overview of the major existing and proposed trails in Houston.

Trail Description System of trails that circle the town and Circle Pathway connect to the pathways along Buck Creek and Bulkley River Short, scenic route along Buck Creek to the Bulkley River/Buck Creek Junction junction between Buck Creek and Bulkley River Buck Creek Dike Trail along dike of Buck Creek Trails around Duck Pond, Houston Secondary, Duck Pond and High School Trails and Twain Sullivan Elementary School System of trails that run through Northside Park Northside Park Trails and parts of Steelhead Park

Figure 3.5: Major Trails

During focus group workshops, residents expressed interest in upgrading trails in the following locations:

• On riparian areas near the Bulkley River, including a proposed pedestrian bridge

• On the property south of Jamie Baxter Park

• On the land between Four Seasons Park and the school site/Walker Road; however, this is private land

Also during focus group workshops, residents expressed interest in additional trails to connect to other destinations outside the centre of town, including the following:

• To residential areas west and north along Highway 16

• To residential areas northeast along Highway 16

• To the mill 31 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to trails.

Strengths Challenges Trail uses are the most Trails need more connectivity, with additional popular indoor or outdoor connections to destinations in and outside of the town activity among residents centre There is a lack of maps and signs of the trail system, Houston’s trails are with signs including wayfinding, regulatory and appreciated by residents interpretive signs, as well as trail markers Damage to paths in Four Seasons Park and dike trails is caused by motorized vehicles

RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning 3.5.1 Design a signage system, including wayfinding, regulatory and interpretive signs, and distance markers.

Capital Development 3.5.2 Identify the most popular trails, and provide distance markers along them.

3.4.5 Upgrade existing trails in high-use areas based on demand.

3.5.3 Install signs throughout the trail network.

Conduct this work in phases.

3.5.4 Provide new trails to complete loops within town, and to provide additional connections to destinations in and outside of the town centre.

Management 3.5.4 Establish better barriers and monitoring to keep motorized vehicles off District trails.

32 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

4. INDOOR RECREATION

4.1. Indoor Recreation Facilities and Programs

DESCRIPTION The District has three recreation facilities that are located within walking distance of each other: Claude Parish Memorial Arena, Houston Leisure Facility, and Houston Community Hall.

Claude L. Parish Memorial Arena The area was built in 1970 and the condition is fair. The building includes one ice sheet with seating for 1,253, an arena viewing room that can be used for events and programs, and five change rooms. The following programs are run by the District in the ice arena:

• Adult Drop-in Shinny • Child Drop-in Shinny • Youth Drop-in Shinny • Free Public Skating (sponsored)

33 Photos courtesy of Houston Today PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

In addition to these programs, the District rents the ice arena to hockey and other sports leagues and private renters. Figure 4.1 shows the groups that use Claude L. Parish Memorial Arena on a regular basis. It is fairly well used; however, the use is declining.

Age Group League Number of Participants Children and Youth Minor Hockey 80-85 Figure Skating 40 Ringette 73 Christian Youth Hockey 64 Adults Older Timers Hockey 22 Mixed Old Timers Hockey 10-18 Morning Hockey 34

Figure 4.1: Ice Arena Users

The arena viewing room is used for District programs such as Pilates, Standard First Aid, and Babysitter Training. It was renovated in 2009 and has elevator access, audio- visual connections, and WIFI. Both the arena and viewing room can be rented.

Houston Leisure Facility The Houston Leisure Facility is a major recreation attraction in Houston for residents and visitors from nearby communities. It was built in 2006 and it is in good condition. The facility includes a 25-metre, 4-lane swimming pool, lazy river, hot tub, sauna, and fitness centre. The swimming pool is a source of pride for residents. The District provides the following aquatic and fitness programs at the leisure centre:

• Red Cross Swim Lessons

• Water Safety Instructor

• National Lifeguard

• Bronze Lifesaving Camp

• Junior Lifeguard Club

• Power Start Aquafit

• Stay Fit Aquafit

• Evening Power Fit

• Circuit Training

• Kid’s Triathlon

34 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Type of Number of Participants Participants Average Class Program Sessions (Resident) (Non-resident) Size Aquatics 135 266 60 2.4 (group) Fitness 18 150 16 9.2 General 2 12 3 7.5 Total 195 438 97 3.3

Figure 4.2 summarizes the 2017 program participation.

In addition to group programs, 25 private swimming lessons were held with 28 participants. Silverthorne Elementary and out-of-town schools come for swimming lessons.

The equipment in the fitness centre was donated and it is showing its age.The District tries to keep up with maintaining the equipment but at some point it will need to be replaced. There are no private gyms in Houston.

Houston Community Hall Constructed in the 1950’s, the Community Hall is one of the oldest buildings in the District. It is centrally located in the downtown area. The upstairs hall is used for weddings, social events, theatre performances, and as a meeting place for local groups. Get Fit Boot Camp and Club’s Day are also held at the Community Hall. Downstairs multi-purpose rooms have been used for a variety of activities over the years. Accessibility to the space within the building is poor due to the staircase at the entry.

A Life Cycle Analysis Report was completed for the Community Hall in 2016. It reported that the facility operates at a reduced level of service due to its age and level of deterioration. The building has incurred large costs in recent years as components have exceeded their useful life and begun to fail. In 2016, freezing in the water sprinkler system caused significant damage, which was covered by insurance, and the repairs have been completed.

The Life Cycle Analysis Report found that a large capital investment in maintaining the facility would not likely create operational savings nor increase the service provided to users. It concluded that a larger investment in a new facility could create operational cost savings while increasing the level of service provided to the community.

Other Indoor Recreation Facilities The Dze L K’ant Friendship Centre provides a number of quality services to the Aboriginal community. These include Early Years and After School Programs. They 35 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

built an indoor playground in 2017 and it is well attended. It appears that some residents are unaware that the playground is open to everyone.

Program Delivery Recreation programs are determined on a seasonal basis by recreation staff. Programs are identified upon request from the community, and implemented on a trial basis when there appears to be sufficient interest. All outdoor sports programs are run by community leagues, with no outdoor programs run directly by the District.

Programs are listed on the District’s website, Facebook page, and in a two- to three- page folded guide. There is minimal advertising, and significant word-of-mouth. Residents can register for programs, book facilities, and purchase memberships and passes online or in person. There are one-month, three-month, and annual memberships, and 10-visit and 25-visit passes available for adults, children, families, seniors, tots and youth. District employees and volunteer firefighters are entitled to free access to the Houston Leisure Facility as part of a wellness program.

Popular programs with increasing registration include Powerfit and SeniorsAquafit. Swim lessons are always offered for all ages, though about one-third are cancelled due to low numbers. Advanced lifesaving is offered, partly to train future pool staff, and it is sometimes a struggle to get sufficient participants. The Seniors Activity Centre is a private organization that runs many programs. The District finds it challenging to find staff with the appropriate credentials to work at the pool and arena.

The arena is closed from the end of March to early September. There are no dry-floor programs. It is rented once or twice annually for dances or concerts.

Some residents made comments about the pool being too expensive. There is not an assistance program.

36 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to indoor recreation facilities and programs.

Strengths Challenges Two thirds of households without children The highest indoor participation was in did not take part in indoor recreation drop-in swimming programs or activities The District has a hard time retaining staff at the pool Residents expressed interest in having Satisfaction is very high for public ice more and/or better teen fitness or sports skating and drop-in swimming opportunities The arena is aging and use is declining Satisfaction is very high for the skating rink, pool and fitness centre The fitness equipment is aging Interests were expressed in more options for adults, e.g., yoga, spin classes, and Houston has a new indoor playground for a clean multi-purpose room that can accommodate fitness classes and an indoor playground The community hall has hosted many The community hall is approaching the programs and events over the years end of its lifespan Residents requested later hours at the pool and extended access to the fitness centre

RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning 4.1.1 Work with teens in the community to identify programs that would interest them, and offer these if possible.

Capital Development 4.1.2 Plan for replacing the fitness equipment.

4.1.3 Develop a security system that allows members to use the fitness centre 24/7.

4.1.4 Consider a new multi-purpose room for fitness classes, potentially at the back of the pool

4.1.5 Acquire some moveable play equipment for the Leisure Centre, potentially including a climbing wall and some features for very young children.

37 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

Management 4.1.6 Open the pool until later in the evening, based on communication with pool users and trial hours that are well communicated.

4.1.7 Acquire some equipment for and plan more dry-floor programs and events in the arena.

4.1.8 Make sure that the community is aware that the Dze L K’ant Friendship Centre indoor playground is open to everyone.

4.1.9 Consider an assistance program for those who need financial support to attend the swimming pool.

4.2. Special Events

DESCRIPTION

Special Events There are around 27 major annual events in Houston, including sports, culture, and community events (Figure 4.3). Events are held at District-owned parks and facilities, and at private facilities.

Month Events Location Houston Curling Ladies Bonspiel Club January Houston Curling Men’s Bonspiel Club February Winter Festival Various locations Claude Parish Houston Figure Skating Club Ice Carnival Memorial Are-na March Houston Curling Mixed Bonspiel Club Pleasant Valley Days Rodeo and Ball Tourna- Four Season’s May ment Park Farmers Market Steelhead Park June RC Flyers Fathers’ Day Fly Jamie Baxter Park Gospel Festival Houston Airport Houston Mud Drags Steelhead Park July Farmers Market Jamie Baxter Park Canada Day Willow Grove Men’s Scramble Steelhead Park

38 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Farmers Market Willow Grove Mr. & Mrs. Tournament Downtown Area August Downtown Merchant Festival Houston Airport Houston Drag Races Show and Shine Farmers Market Steelhead Park September Helen Sullivan Memorial Walk Various locations Ladies Texas Scramble Willow Grove Claude Parish Halloween Celebrations Memorial Arena October Houston Business Excellence Awards Community Hall Houston Home Based Business Fair Community Hall

Ladies Figure Skating Auction Houston November Community Hall Light Up Steelhead Park Houston Shopping Serendipity Craft Fair Mall Claude Parish December Houston Figure Skating Christmas Gala Memorial Arena

Figure 4.3: Annual Events

The Chamber of Commerce maintains a schedule of events on its Facebook page. There are also TV monitors around town with event advertising.

The District has an Event Regulation Bylaw that outlines procedures for booking and hosting events in District facilities and parks (Appendix A).

ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to parkland supply and parks in general.

Strengths Challenges Many residents attend local events and Residents would like to see more events, satisfaction is quite high especially in the amphitheatre Some residents find the Event Regulation The Event Regulation Bylaw makes Bylaw too onerous and believe that it procedures very clear deters events

39 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

RECOMMENDATIONS

Management 4.2.1 Consider more frequent exceptions to the Event Regulation Bylaw for events with high community benefits run by non-profit groups.

4.2.2 Community Groups and Volunteerism

Houston has a number of groups that organize community events, sports, and initiatives (Figure 4.4). A number of community members indicated that it is very difficult to get enough volunteers to work on community parks and recreation initiatives.

Interest Groups Culture Houston Museum Society Royal Canadian Legion Branch 249 Royal Canadian Legion Ladies Auxiliary Community Service/Volunteering Emergency Social Services Fire Department Pleasant Valley Community Market Economic Development Houston Chamber of Commerce Houston Link to Learning Houston Public Library Community Futures – Nadina Education/Community Services Bulkley Valley Community Foundation Houston Community Services Association Society for Creative Anachronism Dze L K’ant Friendship Centre Houston Senior Citizen Association Branch 97 Seniors Seniors Exercise Club Houston Salvation Army Social Services Houston Friendship Centre Love by the Bowl Soup Kitchen Houston and District Curling Club Houston Hiking Society Houston Mountain Bike Association Sports/Fitness Houston Old Timers Hockey Society Morice Mountain Marksman Association Morice Mountain Nordic Ski Club Morice Outdoor Recreation Society Topley 4-H

Figure 4.4: Community Groups 40 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to parkland supply and parks in general.

Strengths Challenges Numerous residents noted that there are few people Houston does have some available and willing to be involved in volunteer very committed volunteers efforts in the community

RECOMMENDATIONS

Management 4.3.1 Work with community volunteers to identify any supports or incentives that the District could provide to encourage more volunteerism, e.g., free passes.

41 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

5. SERVICE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT

5.1. Service Delivery

In the past, there was a Parks and Recreation Department in Houston. Since the last reorganization, parks planning is within the responsibility of general administration (the CAO is the community planner and Approving Officer), programming is covered by Recreation, and parks maintenance is undertaken by Public Works.

The District has a joint use agreement with the School District covering the use of each other’s facilities, but it is around 20 years old. A subsidiary agreement to facilitate subsidized use of the swimming pool by Silverthorne Elementary students participating in Swim at School programs was established in 2017 based on the original agreement.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Houston has significant potential for tourism development that could be enhanced in coordination with parks and recreation. In addition to providing a source of

Photos courtesy of Houston Today 42 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

employment, parks and recreation could be considered part of a larger strategy to attract and retain new residents. There are also significant opportunities, potentially in collaboration with Smithers and Burns Lake, to work together on attracting tourists through more events, regional development of facilities and experiences, and broader communication and marketing.

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS On the community survey, residents made comments about improving the general maintenance and upkeep of the recreation facilities and equipment, parks, trails, and the school fields and track. There were also many comments about the need for more enforcement of dog bylaws.

ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the key strengths and challenges related to service delivery and management.

Strengths Challenges Opportunities that blend tourism Houston has some significant tourist development and parks/recreation have draws not been fully explored Top priority of residents for outdoor parks and recreation in general is a Steelhead Park is maintained to a high higher standard of maintenance of parks standard and trails, including garbage removal, upgrading ball diamonds and the bike park, and winter snow removal Many residents enjoy dog walking on Many residents do not adhere to dog trails and in parks bylaws in terms of leash use and pick-up

RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning 5.1.1 Organize the District’s parks, recreation and economic development (Chamber of Commerce) groups to work together on planning some coordinated economic development efforts, potentially also with Smithers and Burns Lake.

Management 5.1.2 Consider methods for improving maintenance, e.g., Adopt-a-Park, Adopt-a- Trail program, more signage, more bear-friendly garbage cans along trails especially near the centre of town.

5.1.3 Increase monitoring and enforcement of the dog bylaw, e.g., community 43 stewards, communication materials, summer student work. PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

6. IMPLEMENTATION

The District has some limited resources for upgrading and maintaining parks and recreation facilities and programs. Other sources of funding also exist:

• Grants, often available for sustainable initiatives

• Partnerships with the private sector, e.g., businesses supporting events or projects, services in kind for donations of materials or labour

• Volunteer efforts that are acknowledged formally through an incentive, appreciation event, etc.

• Bequests

Because the pace of new development is slow, Houston has minimal opportunity to use development cost charges to support parkland acquisition or park development at this time.

The proposed phasing of the recommendations in this plan is based on community priorities, combined with costs, existing and potential budgets, and other factors, as determined by the consultants and City staff (Figure 6.1). Recommendations and progress towards them should be updated annually as conditions can change.

Photos courtesy of Houston Today 44 Figure 5.1: Implementation Table

Relative Increase in Key Recommendations (abbreviated) Priority Phasing Cost or Operating Cost / Year Costs

3.0 PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION 3.1 Parkland Planning 3.1.1 Establish standards for neighbourhood parks in new developments 2 ongoing Retain a portion of Silverthorne Elementary School site for a neighbourhood park 3.1.2 1 ongoing ? √ if the school is closed 3.1.3 Designate specified District open space and natural areas as parkland 1 ongoing 3.2 Sports Fields Capital Development 3.2.1 Improve the quality of the fields at Four Seasons Park 2 Medium $ 3.2.2 Add a fieldhouse at Four Seasons Park 3 Medium $$$ √ 3.2.3 Decommission the ball diamond at Jamie Baxter Park (see 3.4.4) 1 short $ 3.3 Other Park Amenities Planning 3.3.1 Establish a replacement cycle for playgrounds 1 short 3.3.2 Relocate the outdoor fitness equipment (see 3.4.2) 2 Medium 3.3.3 Plan for a larger new dog off-leash area (see 3.4.2) 2 Medium Work with biking groups to determine the future of the bike park in Jamie Baxter 3.3.4 2 Medium Park (see 3.4.2) 3.3.5 Consider re-establishing a campground in the centre of Houston (see 3.4.2) 3 Long 3.3.6 Consider a multi-purpose court in Jamie Baxter Park (see 3.4.2) 2 Medium Consider leasing the previous heritage area in Four Seasons Park to the rodeo 3.3.7 1 short for rodeo uses and a campground 3.3.8 Consider establishing a pond for skating near the centre of town (see 3.4.2) 3 Long Management 3.3.9 Consider a sliding scale of fees for use of the amphitheatre 1 short Low 3.3.10 Provide additional information on the availability of the tennis courts 1 short 3.4 Park Design and Construction Planning 3.4.1 Use design guidelines provided for new park construction 1 short 3.4.2 Prepare Master Plan for Jamie Baxter Park 1 short $ 3.4.2 Prepare Master Plan for Four Seasons Park 2 Medium $ 3.4.2 Prepare Master Plan for Alexandra Park 2 Medium $ 3.4.2 Prepare Master Plan for site across railroad from Steelhead Park 3 Long $ 3.4.3 Obtain input on the planning and design of neighbourhood parks 2 ongoing $ Capital Development 3.4.4 Upgrade Jamie Baxter Park - Phase 1 1 short $$$ 3.4.4 Upgrade Jamie Baxter Park - Phase 2 2 Medium $$$ √ 3.4.4 Upgrade Jamie Baxter Park - Phase 3 3 Long $$ √ 3.4.5 Upgrade Four Seasons Park - Phase 1 2 Medium $$ √ 3.4.5 Upgrade Four Seasons Park - Phase 2 3 Long $$$ √ 3.4.5 Upgrade Four Seasons Park - Phase 3 Asp $$$ √ 3.4.6 Upgrade Alexandra Park 2 Medium $$$ √ 3.4.7 Build new park across railroad - Phase 1 3 Asp $$$ √ 3.4.7 Build new park across railroad - Phase 2 3 Asp $$$ √ 3.4.7 Build new park across railroad - Phase 3 3 Asp $$$ √ 3.4.8 Replace picnic tables that are in poor condition 1 Quick $ 3.4.9 Replace playgrounds on a regular basis 1 ongoing $$ 3.5 Trails Planning 3.5.1 Design a signage system 1 short $ Capital Development 3.5.2 Provide distance markers along popular trails 1 Quick $ 3.5.3 Upgrade existing trails in high-use areas 2 ongoing $ 3.5.3 Improve signage related to parks 2 ongoing $ 3.5.4 Provide new trails within town and extending out from town 1 ongoing $$ √ Management Establish better barriers and monitoring to keep motorized vehicles off District 3.5.5 2 ongoing $ trails 4.1 Indoor Recreation Facilities and Programs Planning and Design 4.1.1 Work with teens in the community to identify and offer programs of interest 1 ongoing Capital Development 4.1.2 Plan for replacing the fitness equipment 1 short $$ 4.1.3 Develop a security system for 24/7 access to the fitness centre 1 short $ 4.1.4 Consider a new multi-purpose room for fitness classes 2 Medium $ 4.1.5 Acquire some moveable play equipment for the Leisure Centre 1 Quick $ Management 4.1.6 Open the pool until later in the evening 1 Quick √ 4.1.7 Acquire some equipment and plan more dry-floor programs in the arena 1 Quick $ √ 4.1.8 Provide additional information on the availability of the indoor playground 2 Medium $ 45 4.1.9 Consider an assistance program for those who need financial support 1 Quick PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

The following is a key to the phasing:

• Quick Wins – Year 1

• Ongoing – occurs regularly over time

• Short - 1 to 3 years

• Medium - 4 to 6 years

• Long - 7 to 10 years

• Aspirational - over 10 years

For each recommendation, an order-of-magnitude indication of relative capital costs is provided. For one-time costs, such as construction of a neighbourhood park, the symbol indicates the total cost. For ongoing costs, such as trail construction, the symbol refers to an amount that might be spent annually.

• N/A – part of everyday work

• $ - under $50,000

• $$ - $50,000 to $200,000

• $$$ - $200,000 to $1 million

• $$$$ - over $1 million

46 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

APPENDIX A: RELATED PLANS AND POLICIES

The documents summarized below provide the municipal context for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. They are listed in alphabetical order.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Year 2015

Summary The Economic Development Strategy was prepared in response to the closure of a major Houston employer—Houston Forest Products—in 2013, and the need for the community to consider ways of diversifying its economy. Economic development in Houston is led by the Chamber of Commerce through a two-year funding agreement with the District. Tourism was one of the strategies identified as important to diversifying Houston’s economy. The District has many natural assets that are attractive to tourists, particularly its parks and trails. Steelhead Park was specifically cited in this document as important to the promotion of tourism in the area.

The Economic Development Strategy does not consider the parks and Comments recreation system as a whole. As a source of employment and an amenity for residents who move to the area, parks and recreation could be considered as part of a larger strategy to attract and retain new residents.

EVENT REGULATION BYLAW

Year 2014

Summary This bylaw outlines the conditions and procedures that must be met for special events to be held at District parks and facilities. All events must obtain an Event Permit except for low-risk events, events at the Community Hall or Leisure Facility, regular ice use at the arena, and school-sponsored events. Applications must be submitted 45 days in advance and all required approvals must be submitted before the District will issue a permit. Council approval is required for some events, including all beer gardens, extraordinary events such as extreme sports and parades, events at the airport, and other high-risk events.

There is concern by some that event regulation requirements are overly Comments burdensome and may hinder community groups from organizing events. 47 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

FINANCIAL PLAN 2016-2020 Year 2016

Summary The District’s Financial Plan fulfills the Community Charter obligation for every municipality to develop a five-year financial plan that is adopted annually. The Financial Plan outlines anticipated revenues and expenditures. Expenditures related to parks and recreation are paid for through the capital and operating general funds.

Comments The financial plan does not provide details on operating and capital expenditures related to parks and recreation.

HOUSTON BC’S AGE FRIENDLY PLAN Year 2014

Summary The Age Friendly Plan was prepared in response to the aging population trend. The plan provides an overview of Houston’s current age-friendly strengths, challenges, and goals. The plan envisions an age-friendly community as a “community where older adults: have barrier-free access to participate in community life; have intergenerational opportunities for engagement; are heavily engaged in a thriving arts and culture sector (including music and dancing get- togethers); have a well-supported seniors centre; volunteer for activities willingly; and have a plethora of recreation and sports activities.”

Comments The environmental scan completed for this plan identified some information that is relevant for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan:

• two walking paths offer age-friendly potential: Bulkley River/Buck Creek Junction (paved) and the Buck Creek Dike Trail (crushed gravel)

• most public buildings in Houston are basically accessible

• Houston does not have a public transportation system or taxi service

• Houston is home to two seniors’ housing complexes

• many activities are available for older adults through the Seniors Activity Centre

• seniors participate in a number of clubs, societies, and organizations in Houston

48 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

• seniors receive free admission to the Claude Parish Memorial Arena and a discounted rate at the Houston Leisure Facility

The Age Friendly Plan also provides guidelines for making interiors and exteriors more accessible to older adults and anyone facing accessibility issues. HOUSTON TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 2015 (draft)

The Transportation Master Plan was prepared to support the District’s future land use vision as set out in the OCP. This plan identifies a number of options for increasing connections and access in the community.

THE HOUSTON WAY: HEALTH AND WELLNESS CHARTER

Year 2016

Summary The Health and Wellness Charter was prepared to express the District’s commitment and approach to developing a healthy community. The Charter articulates a vision, purpose, goals, and principles relating to improving health in Houston. The following are some of the identified health and wellness challenges in Houston (adapted from the OCP):

• celebrating heritage and arts

• youth activities

• youth retention

• communication among community organizations

• isolation due to location

• maintaining and enhancing senior government support for social and education services

Parks and recreation were identified as playing an important role in meeting these challenges and supporting health and wellness in Houston.

The Health and Wellness Charter is an important source of vision and direction for parks and recreation programming and facilities.

49 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

LEISURE SERVICES USER RATES AND FEES BYLAW Year 2013 (Bylaw #1030), 2015 (Amendment—Bylaw #1073)

Summary This bylaw establishes the policy for charging fees for recreation services. The goal of such bylaws is to balance the larger community goal of providing free or affordable access to recreation facilities with the costs of constructing and maintaining facilities. The bylaw sets fees for public skating and rentals of District facilities, such as the arena, community hall, arena viewing room, and amphitheatre. The bylaw also sets fees for public use of the Leisure Facility pool.

Comments This bylaw is updated on a regular basis as needed.

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT DISTRICT OF HOUSTON AND SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 54 Year 1997

Summary This Memorandum of Agreement outlines the terms for the joint use of District and School District facilities by both parties. It provides for the School District to use the District ice arena and swimming pool, and for the District to use school facilities. The agreement outlines the conditions of use, specifically how, when, and for what types of activities facilities may be used. The District provides arena use to the School District free of charge for eight hours per week, and swimming pool use based on the cost of staff wages plus benefits. The School District provides the District with free use of school facilities on regular school days to run recreational programs.

Comments The document references an old bylaw. It does not include a fee schedule nor calculation for hours of use beyond the minimums, nor does it outline which school facilities are covered by the agreement. Sports fields at schools are not mentioned.

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN Year 2010

Summary Houston’s OCP is currently being updated, with anticipated completion by the end of 2017. The OCP provides the overarching policy to guide District planning. The following are some of the goals related to parks and recreation:

50

DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

• working towards a compact, complete community

• promoting sustainability

• enhancing greenspaces

• supporting arts and culture

• fostering social well-being

• supporting economic development

The completion of a Parks and Recreation Master Plan was identified as an objective in the 2010 OCP, with specific mention of increasing trail activities, and expanding the trail network to connect parks and facilities.

PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

Year 1980

Summary Houston was a very different place when this plan was prepared. The following key recommendations have been accomplished: “highway” parks (Steelhead Park) “Riverside Park” (Jamie Baxter Park), Houston Athletic Park (Four Seasons Park), trail system (partial), and swimming pool. Other recommendations were not completed: town square and community centre. Two additional staff were also suggested.

Comments This document is no longer relevant due to its age.

RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT: A TELEPHONE SURVEY Year 1993

Summary A telephone survey of 375 residents seeking opinions on the amount of recreation services, types of recreation opportunities for people of different ages, barriers to participation, ideas for future opportunities, and financing options. This survey was likely used to help acquire funding for the swimming pool.

Comments This document is no longer relevant due to its age.

51 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

STRATEGIC PLAN Year 2017

Summary The Strategic Plan sets the District’s priorities each year. Among the eight key priorities for 2017 is the preparation of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.

OTHER PARKS AND RECREATION POLICIES The following are other policies that relate to parks and recreation:

• Arena Storage & Dressing Room Use Policy

• Arena Users Policy

• Arena Viewing Room Policy

• Community Hall Policy

• Designated Driver Program Policy

• Donation Program Policy

• Healthy Food & Beverage Sales Policy

• Heritage Church Usage Policy

• Incentives for Promotion of Leisure Facility Policy

• Leisure Services Department—Operational Guidelines

• Mountain Bicycling Master Plan – Mt. Harry Davis Recreation Area, 2012

• Northwood Picnic Site Policy

• Walking Trail Development Master Plan, 1996

52 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

APPENDIX B: SURVEY AND FOCUS GROUP INPUTC

Community Survey

The following are the summary tables from the community survey:

53 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

54 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

55 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

56 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

57 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

58 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

59 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

60 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

61 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

62 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

63 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

64 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

65 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

66 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

67 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

68 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

69 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

70 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

71 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

72 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

Focus Groups

All input collected during the sessions was documented and is presented below. The workshop questions are listed in the left column of each table. The ideas suggested by participants are summarized in the right column in no particular order. Where an item is followed by a number, this indicates the number of participants who offered the same or a similar idea. Participants were told they did not need to repeat ideas already generated so multiple responses do not necessarily indicate that one response is more popular or important than another.

The vision, objectives, and recommendations are presented in the order of priority determined by “voting” using audience response technology. Participants were asked to select their top five choices in order of priority, and the final list is ranked based on the priorities of all participants. Items listed below the numbered lists are additional suggestions or elaborations from the brainstorming sessions.

HEALTH, SAFETY, EDUCATION, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE (CHESS) Date: May 8, 2017

Time: 10:00am

In Attendance: 8 people

What do you like best about parks and recreation in the District of Houston?

Parks Indoor Recreation • Jamie Baxter Park • Swimming pool (4)

• Jamie Baxter amphitheatre * one of the best in BC

• Fishing at By-Mac Park • Variety and availability of programs for all ages (2) • Close proximity of parks • Lifeguard programs are excellent

Outdoor Recreation • Close proximity of facilities • Great trails systems (3) • Multiple locations for a small community

73 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

What do you like least about parks and recreation in the District of Houston?

Parks • Worn out parks

Outdoor Recreation • Trails need better maintenance, especially in winter (3)

• Incomplete walking trails (2)

• Need better signage and maps for trails (2)

• No formal areas for motorized vehicles

Indoor Recreation • Arena and community hall are aging, uninviting

• Need affordable options/subsidies

Other • Not enough volunteers/volunteer burnout

• Not enough staff

• Need better signage outside community

• Need more community events to draw in visitors from other communities

What are the vision and objectives that should guide the Master Plan? 1. Affordable access

2. Realistic goals

3. Connected paths

4. Involved community

5. Age friendly

6. Health and wellness

7. Diverse programs

8. Inspire participation

9. Environmental appreciation

• Easy access to parks and facilities

74 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

What specific recommendations or ideas should be considered? 1. Promotion and signage

2. Access funding and grants, sustainable programs

3. Less red tape for events

4. Early childhood play structures

5. Foster volunteers

6. Connected trails

7. Facility upgrades

8. More community events

9. Program subsidies

10. More staff resources

• Promote outdoor opportunities

PUBLIC WORKSHOP #1 Date: May 8, 2017

Time: 4:00pm

In Attendance: 6 people

What do you like best about parks and recreation in the District of Houston?

Parks Outdoor Recreation • Northside Park (2) • Dike trails (2)

* park includes rare forest type • Triathlon

• Amphitheatre (2) • Skate park

• Steelhead Park garden Indoor Recreation • Duck Pond • Pool

• Gym

75 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

What do you like least about parks and recreation in the District of Houston?

Parks • Loss of pride in natural areas

• Lack of maintenance on Duck Pond

• Jamie Baxter playground is old and dilapidated

• Trees cut down on east side of dike

Outdoor Recreation • Dike trail loop is too small and not connected to other trails (2)

• Dike trail loop needs winter maintenance

• Bike park is dilapidated and built for motocross, not bikes

• Northside trails are not maintained well

Other • Not many events, amphitheatre rarely used

What are the vision and objectives that should guide the Master Plan? 1. Improve pride in natural areas

2. Use trails to connect neighbourhoods

3. Keep opportunities in town

4. More park opportunities

5. Improve partnerships with community groups – provide access, promotion

6. Year-round uses

7. Better communication from District

What specific recommendations or ideas should be considered? 1. Link and improve trails

2. New parks on municipal/Crown land in natural areas

3. Interpretive signs – natural and cultural

4. Renewal of Jamie Baxter Park – play area, campground

5. More garbage cans (nicer ones)

76 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

6. Year-round downhill activities, hockey rink/sports court

7. More events

8. More marketing to tourists

9. Bike park

10. Indoor playground

• Spray park

• Potentially develop southeast park/municipal land into park

• Mount Harry Davis Family Centre and Campground

• Examine feasibility of reopening the campground

• Designate and maintain Northside trails

• Expand trail network and connect trails to town and neighbourhoods

• Activities for free-range kids

• More kids’ programs and events

• Late hours at pool

• Signage acknowledging First Nation land

• Use Steelhead Park to promote other parks, facilities, and events (e.g. display board)

• Improve communication of District goings-on, events, etc., especially through website

PUBLIC WORKSHOP #2

Date: May 8, 2017

Time: 7:00pm

In Attendance: 6 people

What do you like best about parks and recreation in the District of Houston?

Parks • Steelhead Park is beautiful, place for people to gather (3)

• Accessibility of parks 77 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

• Neighbourhood parks – close to home, go for a walk, play, etc.

• Jamie Baxter campground

Outdoor Recreation • Walking paths and trails (2)

• Fishing at river / lake

• Swimming holes along Buck Creek and Bulkley River

• Accessible trails

• Cross-country ski trails

• Snowmobiling

• Fishing

• Well-used skate park

Indoor Recreation • Houston Leisure Facility

• Claude Parish Memorial Arena

• Seniors’ activity centre – painting, games, lots of activities

• Curling rink

• School program at the arena

Other • Events (3)

* Canada Day

* Gospel Fest

* Harvest Fest

* Pleasant Valley Days

* Mud Bogs

* Drag Races

78 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

What do you like least about parks and recreation in the District of Houston?

Parks • Four Seasons Park – dugouts are tiny

• No ice in neighbourhood parks in winter

• Condition of children’s’ play parks

• Condition of signs at Duck Pond

Outdoor Recreation • Bad condition of Twain Secondary field

Other • Lack of community buy-in

What are the vision and objectives that should guide the Master Plan? 1. Continuity of the plan

2. Include activities for youth

3. Environmental appreciation

4. Prioritize high use when considering projects

5. Age-friendly, disability friendly

6. Centralize features in parks/recreation centres

7. Support multi-cultural social inclusion

8. Long term plan ready for grants

• Greater community respect for the parks we have

What specific recommendations or ideas should be considered? 1. Trail markers, connected trail system

2. Make better use of amphitheatre

3. School swim program

4. Enclosed space for music and theatre

5. Municipal campground

6. Acknowledge First Nations culture

79 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

7. Bike pump track

8. More curling ice

9. Maze, graffiti wall

10. Natural vegetation within parks

• Interpretive signs

OPEN HOUSE DISPLAY BOARDS Date: May 8, 2017

Time: 5:00pm

What do you like best about parks and recreation in the District of Houston?

Parks • Steelhead Park

Outdoor Recreation • Trails along dike

• Duck Pond trails

Indoor Recreation • Family skates

• Pool

What do you like least about parks and recreation in the District of Houston?

Parks • Irrigation Lake needs improvement

• Jamie Baxter Park is worn out

What are the vision and objectives that should guide the Master Plan? • Getting people active

• Building community

80 DISTRICT OF HOUSTON

What specific recommendations or ideas should be considered?

Parks • Improve Irrigation Lake – plant new trees, see Bear Lake in Prince George as an example

• Jamie Baxter needs improvement

Outdoor Recreation • Expand trail network along Duck Pond, Dike – connect everything

• Pump track for kids

• Promote/raise awareness of tennis courts

• Expand and improve skate park

Indoor Recreation • Climbing wall

• Offer programs at times that work for shift workers

Other • Better promote events, programs, and other town news

81 PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX C: MAPS

82 S

E

R

C

Y

A

W

H

G I

H

6

1

NORWOOD ST Y

W H

H

O

U Parks and Recreation

S

T

O

N Master Plan

B

Northside R

I

D Park G E Existing Parks and Trails

Northside Park

Steelhead District of Houston Municipal Boundary Park Parcel Boundaries Multi-use Park u l k l e B y R i v e r Neighbourhood Park 6 Y 1 HW Natural Parks School Grounds Building Recreation Facilities Newgard Park Other Municipal Land

A

V

11TH ST A L

O

N

A

V Existing Trail Community E

Æ Ä OMINECA CRES T Hall W Silverthorn E Proposed Trail

E 16 V

E Elementary A D IE R

E Highways

A L

V T

E U

B Avalon Park

16 Arena and Y HW Pool Curling

PEARSON RD K

M A James

A N A 8

5 T : A Baxter Alexandra 5

0 A : V

0 Park E Park 1 t a

7 1

0 n r y C r e e k 2 e N Nadina Park H , AD 5 INA 2 HAGMAN CRES WA M y Y l O R U J u D Hagman Park N

n T E A o

IN

t D

I H n VI S u E U W L p l L N R I D D I y R V G b H R E

E R d B N R e A t O F N a

S O K d S p R D L u R D t O s G D a OO

L L R D 6 1 Y RD RD x d E HW ESPI m LL . Duck Pond GI Y

A A

v Walker Road W

e

R A

- Park

C

L E

4

N I x 3

2 M 2

O - s l POPLAR ST i a r Ruiter T

d Houston n Heights Church a Secondary k s r D Park a R P S g T

n A i FL s t CK x i U

E B The accuracy & completeness of information shown on this

-

n drawing is not guaranteed. It will be the responsibility of the user o Twain Sullivan s t of the information shown on this drawing to locate & establish the u o Elementary precise location of all existing information whether shown or not. H \ t n e r r u k C r C B u c e e \ k D X M s \ 0 125 250 500 | c t e j o r Metres P \ N S I G

s \ | Coordinate System: Scale: y s i l a NAD 1983 UTM Zone 9N 1:6,000 n  A - n g

s i Data Sources: e D

- - Regional District Bulkley Nechako (2017) g Four n i - Data BC (2016) t

f Y A a r Seasons W - Google (2017) D

- A

D C \ Park

1 E 0

\ N I 0 Project #: 0716.0020.01 2 M 0

0 O \ Author: LP 6 1 7 0

\ Checked: CB N A

V Status: ~ DRAFT ~ s _ c t e j Revision: A o r P \

: Date: 2017 / 7 / 25 FIGURE 1 U BA RRETT S TATION R RD a s p b e r r y C r e e k k e C r e r e t l

a

n u

D

H

W

Y

1

6 E

6

W 1 Y W H

e k s C r e M a t h e w

g a M c K i l l i n C r e e k

Parks and Recreation Master Plan

k e e r C c k t o Existing Parks and Trails S

District of Houston Municipal Boundary Parcel Boundaries 6 1

Y W H Multi-use Park Neighbourhood Park

H

W

Y Natural Parks

1 6 School Grounds Building Recreation Facilities

S E Other Municipal Land R

C

Y A 6

1 W

Y H

G W I Existing Trail H H Proposed Trail NOR WO OD ST

H

W

Y

1 6 Highways

H

O

U

S

T

O

N

B

R

I

D

G

E

Northside Steelhead Park Park

16 Y HW

Community

11TH ST

T Hall

W E Æ Ä OMIN ECA CRES E Newgard Silverthorn V

E A D 16 IE Park Elementary R E A L Avalon Park

V T H E W U

Y B 1 6 James Northwood 16 Arena Y Baxter Park Curling Picnic Site HW and Pool

M K A RD James A N N A O T S Baxter 5 B u A R l k l e A A

5 y E R i v e r V P : Park E 1 Nadina Park 1 N k AD S e e : I E e n r R N H r A W HA CR y C AY GMANH D

0

U

E 1 N Alexandra

D D Hagman Park R I G t R I S V

E L Park E a N R R L

I O B F A H S O 7 N S

R K L 1 D GO D O O R

0 L

D D Y

R A 2 D D R E R PI

S W

, E

Duck Pond GILL A

5 C 2

H E

WY 16 N

Walker Road I y Houston l

POPLAR ST M

Ruiter Secondary Park O J u Church n Heights o Park Twain t n Sullivan u p

l Elementary B y u c k C r e e k b d e t a

M d

O p U u N

Four T t A

s I Seasons N

a V

L Park I E

W

D R x d m . A v e R

-

L 4 x 3 2 2

- s l i a r T d n a

i v e r k s R o r i c e

r M a By-Mac Park P g n i s t x i By-Mac Park

E The accuracy & completeness of information shown on this

-

n drawing is not guaranteed. It will be the responsibility of the user o

s t of the information shown on this drawing to locate & establish the u o precise location of all existing information whether shown or not. H \ t n e r B r U

u C K

C F \ L A T D S

X R D M s \ 0 125 250 500 | c t e j o r Metres P \ N S I G

s \ | Coordinate System: Scale: y s i l a NAD 1983 UTM Zone 9N 1:20,000 n  A - n D u n g a t e C r e e k g

s i Data Sources: e D

- - Regional District Bulkley Nechako (2017) g n i - Data BC (2016) t f a r - Google (2017) D - D \ 1 0 \

0 Project #: 0716.0020.01 2 0 0 \ Author: LP 6 1 7 0

\ Checked: CB N A

V Status: ~ DRAFT ~ s _

c t P

e e j a Revision: A c o o

r c k

P C r \ e

: FIGURE 1 e Date: 2017 / 7 / 25 k U k R e a e BARRETT RD s p r STATI ON b e C r r y C r e e r k e a l t n u

D

H

W

Y

1 E 6 16

W Y HW

C r e e k s w t h e M a M c K i l l i g a n C r e e k

Parks and Recreation Master Plan

k e e r C Inventory k

c o

t

S

Æ 16 Ä

District of Houston Municipal Boundary

6 Parcel Boundaries 1

Y W H Parks Schools Recreation Facilities

H W

Y Other Municipal Land

1 6 Existing Trail Proposed Trail Highways S E R C

Y A

W

H

G I

H

Northside Park

Ri v e r y 6 l e 1 k Y l HW u B Newgard Steelhead T W E 11TH ST

Silverthorn V E Park Park E A OMINECA C D R I Elementary R E E E Community Avalon S H A L Northwood W V T Y E 1 Arena and U Hall Park Picnic Site 6 6 B Y 1 Private Pool W H School Curling ON RD James RS A Alexandra PE Baxter A M

H Park 8 R A Park C r e e k 2 S D G H e n : E r y NadinaHagman MAN C R 9 E R D I D 3 V I R : B E S Park 0 Park R N u L B L 1 c I O D A

O

t S R k N H K M S a Duck C L r D

I 7 E e R N O SPI e 1 E k Pond ILL E

0 G

C 2 H A WY 1 , 6 Walker Road Park W 5 Ruiter Heights Park

1 A

Y y Church Twain Sullivan a

M Elementary n o and Houston t n

u Secondary p l y b d e t a

d Four p u

t Seasons s a Park L

d x m A .

v M e

O R U -

N

L T A 4 I 3 N x V 2 I

2 E W -

D w R e B i U

r v C

e K v r F O R i v e L A - i c e o r T y M S r

o R t D n e v n I By-Mac Park The accuracy & completeness of information shown on this -

n drawing is not guaranteed. It will be the responsibility of the user o t

s of the information shown on this drawing to locate & establish the u o precise location of all existing information whether shown or not. H \ t n r e u C \ X D M \

s 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 t | c e j Metres P r o \ N S I G \

s | i s Coordinate System: Scale: y l a NAD 1983 UTM Zone 9N 1:20,000  - A n n g i

s Data Sources: e D

- - Regional District Bulkley Nechako (2017) g e k n e i g r t u n a t C - Data BC (2016) f D e r a - Google (2017) D - D \ 1 0 \

0 Project #: 0716.0020.01 2 0 0 \ Author: LP 6 1 7 0

\ Checked: CB A N

V P Status: ~ DRAFT ~

_ e a o s c t

c c e k j Revision: A o C r

P r e

\ e

: k Date: 2017 / 5 / 15 FIGURE 1 U

E

V

A

S

Y

O R

NORWOOD ST

S E R C

Y A NT CRT W MO H IEW G V I H

Parks and Recreation Master Plan

Inventory

D Northside R ST E EY Park D V LL R A A

R 3 V

S E N

F N

O

I Y C District of Houston Municipal Boundary

A

O N I

B P

E M L L

L T A O Parcel Boundaries

E S H N D H 4T D C T I A S Parks V H M E 6T Steelhead STAR ST ST E Schools H Park B u l 5T V k l e A y R i v e r

R Recreation Facilities

E

I

T T B E

E S

V N N Other Municipal Land

A

O H

S

R O C N

9TH ST F N R O I Existing Trail L A EA B V R A

A V E IC N A PIC Proposed Trail W 3RD ST 10TH ST Highways

QUITY PL E 11TH ST E T Newgard Park V

W A

E E N

V E OMINECA CRES O A T D

S I T

E L A Community Hall TH 12TH ST

A U

N 5

I W V E O

D E Silverthorn Avalon

P E

V

A Æ

Ä A V

N A

B

Elementary Park

D A R N 16 G N

W 13TH ST 13TH ST E G E A

L E

L

V R T

E M

A

U T

P A B C R N

O W

A C CRES

C A

L L

E E

D W 14TH ST 14TH ST N

O I

N L

Arena A Private I

A

T A

A

and C

School V Curling 15TH E Pool ST

D E

R V E 16TH ST G A TA N R RO E F PEARSON RD T

IN K N L James I B A N AM W

A M A

H T Baxter Alexandra 6 ST A

1

: L I A Y E 1 A Park Park R V A 4 RD V : N E N

W A 0

A O

1 S D S t N E I L a K A N O ANE U 7 L A V PARK

I D 1 C r e e k L 0 A r y

L n 2 V L e Nadina B ,

E U Hagman u H P HAGMAN CRES c 5

k S M C 1 r

A e R Park O e y k N Park U a D N I N A

M D T E D IN AI n A A N D o I W D V

S N t A R S Y IE

n E L R W u E L R COOP I p D l C R H y T b T R d I O e V 6 I t 1 E L a Y R L d W RD B p H E RISH A u A N P

t K H s D a U R L

D N D R R G IE d SP

x E E LL N I R G m . O G F

A T O Duck Pond E O O v L L L R e A D D D H D R R T R EL D D - I I EW R D J Walker L M D R 4 3 x Road Park 2 Ruiter Heights Park 2

- POPLAR ST

RD D a R E R

K L O r e VR A IEN Twain Sullivan W E A D I M RD n Church V

I a Elementary and R N

r b A E U

H C

- Houston Secondary A y

r W o

t A n RD e S Y v AT n L I F The accuracy & completeness of information shown on this

- K C n U drawing is not guaranteed. It will be the responsibility of the user o B t

s of the information shown on this drawing to locate & establish the u o precise location of all existing information whether shown or not. H \ t n r e u C \ X D M \

s 0 125 250 t | c e j Metres P r o \ N S I G \

s | i s Coordinate System: Scale: y l a NAD 1983 UTM Zone 9N 1:6,000  - A n n g i

s Data Sources: e D

- - Regional District Bulkley Nechako (2017) g Four n i

t - Data BC (2016) f Seasons DUNGATE DR r a - Google (2017) D -

D Park \ 1 0 \

0 Project #: 0716.0020.01 2 0 0 \ Author: LP 6 1 7 0

\ Checked: CB A N

V EQUITY MINE RD Status: ~ DRAFT ~ _ s t c e j Revision: A o P r \

: Date: 2017 / 5 / 15 FIGURE 2 U