DOCSLIB.ORG

Universal Grammar Is Dead 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Universal Grammar Is Dead 7 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2009) 32, 429–492 doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999094X The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science Nicholas Evans Department of Linguistics, Research School of Asian and Pacific Studies, Australian National University, ACT 0200, Australia [email protected] http://rspas.anu.edu.au/people/personal/evann_ling.php Stephen C. Levinson Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, NL-6525 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Radboud University, Department of Linguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands [email protected] http://www.mpi.nl/Members/StephenLevinson Abstract: Talk of linguistic universals has given cognitive scientists the impression that languages are all built to a common pattern. In fact, there are vanishingly few universals of language in the direct sense that all languages exhibit them. Instead, diversity can be found at almost every level of linguistic organization. This fundamentally changes the object of enquiry from a cognitive science perspective. This target article summarizes decades of cross-linguistic work by typologists and descriptive linguists, showing just how few and unprofound the universal characteristics of language are, once we honestly confront the diversity offered to us by the world’s 6,000 to 8,000 languages. After surveying the various uses of “universal,” we illustrate the ways languages vary radically in sound, meaning, and syntactic organization, and then we examine in more detail the core grammatical machinery of recursion, constituency, and grammatical relations. Although there are significant recurrent patterns in organization, these are better explained as stable engineering solutions satisfying multiple design constraints, reflecting both cultural-historical factors and the constraints of human cognition. Linguistic diversity then becomes the crucial datum for cognitive science: we are the only species with a communication system that is fundamentally variable at all levels. Recognizing the true extent of structural diversity in human language opens up exciting new research directions for cognitive scientists, offering thousands of different natural experiments given by different languages, with new opportunities for dialogue with biological paradigms concerned with change and diversity, and confronting us with the extraordinary plasticity of the highest human skills. Keywords: Chomsky; coevolution; constituency; culture; dependency; evolutionary theory; Greenberg; linguistic diversity; linguistic typology; recursion; universal grammar 1. Introduction universals. Structural differences should instead be accepted for what they are, and integrated into a new approach to language and cognition that places diversity According to Chomsky, a visiting Martian scientist would surely conclude that aside from their mutually unintelligible vocabularies, at centre stage. Earthlings speak a single language. The misconception that the differences between — Steven Pinker (1994, p. 232) languages are merely superficial, and that they can be resolved by postulating a more abstract formal level at Languages are much more diverse in structure than cogni- which individual language differences disappear, is tive scientists generally appreciate. A widespread assump- serious: it now pervades a great deal of work done in tion among cognitive scientists, growing out of the psycholinguistics, in theories of language evolution, generative tradition in linguistics, is that all languages language acquisition, neurocognition, parsing and speech are English-like but with different sound systems and recognition, and just about every branch of the cognitive vocabularies. The true picture is very different: languages sciences. Even scholars like Christiansen and Chater differ so fundamentally from one another at every level of (2008), concerned to demonstrate the evolutionary impossi- description (sound, grammar, lexicon, meaning) that it is bility of pre-evolved constraints, employ the term Universal very hard to find any single structural property they Grammar as if it were an empirically verified construct. A share. The claims of Universal Grammar, we argue here, great deal of theoretical work within the cognitive sciences are either empirically false, unfalsifiable, or misleading thus risks being vitiated, at least if it purports to be investi- in that they refer to tendencies rather than strict gating a fixed human language processing capacity, rather # Cambridge University Press, 2009 0140-525X/09 $40.00 429 Evans & Levinson: The myth of language universals than just the particular form this takes in some well-known psychologists learned from the linguistic wars of the 1970s languages like English and Japanese. (Newmeyer 1986) to steer clear from too close an associ- How did this widespread misconception of language uni- ation with any specific linguistic theory, the underlying formity come about? In part, this can be attributed simply idea that all languages share the same structure at some to ethnocentrism – most cognitive scientists, linguists abstract level has remained pervasive, tying in nicely to included, speak only the familiar European languages, all the modularity arguments of recent decades (Fodor 1983). close cousins in structure. But in part it can be attributed It will take a historian of science to unravel the causes to misleading advertizing copy issued by linguists them- of this ongoing presumption of underlying language uni- selves. Unfortunate sociological splits in the field have left formity. But a major reason is simply that there is a lack generative and typological linguists with completely differ- of communication between theorists in the cognitive ent views of what is proven science, without shared rules sciences and those linguists most in the know about lin- of argumentation that would allow them to resolve the guistic diversity. This is partly because of the reluctance issue – and in dialogue with cognitive scientists it has by most descriptive and typological linguists to look up been the generativists who have been taken as representing from their fascinating particularistic worlds and engage the dominant view. As a result, Chomsky’s notion of Univer- with the larger theoretical issues in the cognitive sal Grammar (UG) has been mistaken, not for what it is – sciences. Outsiders have instead taken the articulate namely, the programmatic label for whatever it turns out envoys from the universalizing generativist camp to to be that all children bring to learning a language – but represent the consensus view within linguistics. But for a set of substantial research findings about what all there are other reasons as well: the relevant literature languages have in common. For the substantial findings is forbiddingly opaque to outsiders, bristling with about universals across languages one must turn to the arcane phonetic symbols and esoteric terminologies. field of linguistic typology, which has laid bare a bewildering Our first goal (sect. 2) in this article, then, is to survey range of diverse languages, where the generalizations are some of the linguistic diversity that has been largely really quite hard to extract. Chomsky’s views, filtered ignored in the cognitive sciences, which shows how differ- through various commentators, have been hugely influen- ently languages can be structured at every level: phonetic, tial in the cognitive sciences, because they combine philoso- phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic. We phically sophisticated ideas and mathematical approaches critically evaluate (sect. 3) the kind of descriptive general- to structure with claims about the innate endowment for izations (again, misleadingly called “universals”) that have language that are immediately relevant to learning theorists, emerged from careful cross-linguistic comparisons, and cognitive psychologists, and brain scientists. Even though we survey the treacherously different senses of “universal” that have allowed the term to survive a massive accumu- lation of counterevidence. NICHOLAS EVANS is Professor of Linguistics at the We then turn to three syntactic features that have Australian National University. His more than 120 recently figured large in debates about the origin of linguistic publications include grammars of Kayardild language: grammatical relations (sect. 4), constituency and Bininj Gun-wok; dictionaries of Kayardild and (sect. 5), and recursion (sect. 6). How universal are these Dalabon; edited books on polysynthesis, linguistic pre- features? We conclude that there are plenty of languages history, and grammar-writing; and the recent Dying that do not exhibit them in their syntax. What does it Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have mean for an alleged universal to not apply in a given To Tell Us (Wiley Blackwell, 2009). He has carried out case? We will consider the idea of “parameters” and the intensive fieldwork on a number of languages of Australia and Papua New Guinea. Current research projects focus idea of UG as a “toolkit” (Jackendoff 2002). on the encoding of psychosocial cognition in grammar, We then turn (sect. 7) to the question of how all this song language traditions of Arnhem Land, and languages diversity is to be accounted for. We suggest, first, that lin- of South Coast New Guinea. Evans is a fellow of the guistic diversity patterns just like biological diversity and Australian Academy of the Humanities. should be understood in the same sorts of ways, with func- tional pressures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Event Representations Constrain the Structure of Language: Sign
    Correction PSYCHOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES Correction for “Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases,” by Brent Strickland, Carlo Geraci, Emmanuel Chemla, Philippe Schlenker, Meltem Kelepir, and Roland Pfau, which appeared in issue 19, May 12, 2015, of Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (112:5968–5973; first published April 27, 2015; 10.1073/ pnas.1423080112). The authors note that the following statement should be added to the Acknowledgments: “This research received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement 324115–FRONTSEM (principal investi- gator, Philippe Schlenker).” www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1600619113 E1326 | PNAS | March 1, 2016 | vol. 113 | no. 9 www.pnas.org Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases Brent Stricklanda,b,1, Carlo Geracia, Emmanuel Chemlac, Philippe Schlenkera, Meltem Kelepird, and Roland Pfaue aInstitut Jean Nicod, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France; bLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS, 75006 Paris, France; cLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France; dDepartment of Linguistics, Bogaziçi University, Istanbul 34342, Turkey; and eDepartment of Linguistics, University of Amsterdam, 1012VT Amsterdam, Netherlands Edited by Lila R. Gleitman, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, and approved March 3, 2015 (received for review December 3, 2014) According to a theoretical tradition dating back to Aristotle, verbs dynamic events can be classified into two broad grammatical can be classified into two broad categories. Telic verbs (e.g., “decide,” categories: telic and atelic (16–20).
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Number 14
    FACT SHEET No. #4 DEEP TIME AND DRAGON DREAMING: THE SUSTAINABLE ABORIGINAL SPIRITUALITY OF THE SONG LINES, FROM CELEBRATION TO DREAMING John Croft update 28th March 2014 This Factsheet by John Croft is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at [email protected]. ABSTRACT: It is suggested that in a culture that is suicidal, to get a better understanding of what authentic sustainability is about requires us to see through the spectrum of a different culture. Australian Aboriginal cultures, sustainable for arguably 70,000 years, provide one such useful lens. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................2 AN INTRODUCTION TO ABORIGINAL CULTURE ............................................................................... 4 THE UNSUSTAINABILITY OF CIVILISED CULTURES ........................................................................... 6 DREAMING: AN ALTERNATIVE VIEW OF TIME? ............................................................................. 10 ABORIGINAL DREAMING, DEEP ECOLOGY AND THE ECOLOGICAL SELF ....................................... 17 DREAMING AND SUSTAINABILITY ................................................................................................. 21 DISCOVERING YOUR OWN PERSONAL SONGLINE ......................................................................... 24 _____________________________________________________________________________________D
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Modeling in the Tyrrhena Terra Region of Mars Scott C
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115, E09001, doi:10.1029/2009JE003429, 2010 Watershed modeling in the Tyrrhena Terra region of Mars Scott C. Mest,1,2 David A. Crown,1 and William Harbert3 Received 9 May 2009; revised 13 December 2009; accepted 29 January 2010; published 1 September 2010. [1] Watershed analyses from high‐resolution image (Viking, Mars Orbiter Camera, and Thermal Emission Imaging System) and topographic (Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter [MOLA]) data are used to qualitatively and quantitatively characterize highland fluvial systems and analyze the role of water in the evolution of Tyrrhena Terra (13°S–30°S, 265°W–280°W), Mars. In this study, Geographical Information System software is used in conjunction with MOLA Digital Elevation Models to delineate drainage basin divides, extract valley networks, and derive basin and network morphometric parameters (e.g., drainage density, stream order, bifurcation ratio, and relief morphometry) useful in characterizing the geologic and climatic conditions of watershed formation, as well as for evaluating basin “maturity” and processes of watershed development. Model‐predicted valley networks and watershed boundaries, which are dependent on the degree to which pixel sinks are filled in the topographic data set and a channelization threshold, are evaluated against image and topographic data, slope maps, and detailed maps of valley segments from photogeologic analyses. Valley morphologies, crater/valley relationships, and impact crater distributions show that valleys in Tyrrhena Terra are ancient. Based on geologic properties of the incised materials, valley and network morphologies, morphometric parameters, and the presence of many gullies heading at or near‐crater rim crests, surface runoff, derived from rainfall or snowmelt, was the dominant erosional process; sapping may have only played a secondary role in valley formation in Tyrrhena Terra.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARS 2020 ROVER ENGINEERING CAMERAS. J. N. Maki1, C
    51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2020) 2663.pdf THE MARS 2020 ROVER ENGINEERING CAMERAS. J. N. Maki1, C. M. McKinney1, R. G. Willson1, R. G. Sellar1, D. S. Copley-Woods1, M. Valvo1, T. Goodsall1, J. McGuire1, K. Singh1, T. E. Litwin1, R. G. Deen1, A. Cul- ver1, N. Ruoff1, D. Petrizzo1, 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, [email protected]). Introduction: The Mars 2020 Rover is equipped pairs (the Cachecam, a monoscopic camera, is an ex- with a neXt-generation engineering camera imaging ception). The Mars 2020 engineering cameras are system that represents a significant upgrade over the packaged into a single, compact camera head (see fig- previous Navcam/Hazcam cameras flown on MER and ure 1). MSL [1,2]. The Mars 2020 engineering cameras ac- quire color images with wider fields of view and high- er angular/spatial resolution than previous rover engi- neering cameras. Additionally, the Mars 2020 rover will carry a new camera type dedicated to sample op- erations: the Cachecam. History: The previous generation of Navcams and Hazcams, known collectively as the engineering cam- eras, were designed in the early 2000s as part of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) program. A total of Figure 1. Flight Navcam (left), Flight Hazcam (middle), 36 individual MER-style cameras have flown to Mars and flight Cachecam (right). The Cachecam optical assem- on five separate NASA spacecraft (3 rovers and 2 bly includes an illuminator and fold mirror. landers) [1-6]. The MER/MSL cameras were built in two separate production runs: the original MER run Each of the Mars 2020 engineering cameras utilize a (2003) and a second, build-to-print run for the Mars 20 megapixel OnSemi (CMOSIS) CMOS sensor Science Laboratory (MSL) mission in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Biolinguistics Or Physicolinguistics? Is the Third Factor Helpful Or Harmful in Explaining Language?
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Biolinguistics. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Johansson, S. (2013) Biolinguistics or Physicolinguistics? Is The Third Factor Helpful Or Harmful In Explaining Language?. Biolinguistics, 7: 249-275 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Open Access journal Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-22990 250 S. Johansson But what does it mean to explain language? What kind of understanding should we aim for, and how does this three-way split help us? Generative linguists have long distinguished three levels of theoretical goals in linguistics (Chomsky 1965): • ‘observational adequacy’, that a theory describes language usage.1 • ‘descriptive adequacy’, that a theory accounts for the phenomena observed in adult language competence. • ‘explanatory adequacy’, that a theory accounts for how children can ac- quire adult language competence. The minimalist program entails a desire to move “beyond explanatory adequacy” (Chomsky 2004), adding a new level of theoretical goals, explaining not just what language is like and how it can be acquired, but also explaining in a principled way why it is that way. Chomsky (2007b) associates ‘what’ questions with descriptive adequacy, ‘how’ with explanatory, and ‘why’ with going beyond explanatory. Chomsky (2007b, 2010) calls an account of language “principled” if it goes beyond explanatory adequacy, grounding features of language in general non-linguistic principles, notably principles of efficient computation, which belong to the third factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Professor CEDRIC BOECKX
    Interview with Professor CEDRIC BOECKX (Catalan Institute for Advanced Studies & Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) Cedric Boeckx is a Research Professor at the Catalan Institute for Advanced Studies (ICREA), and a member of the Center for Theoretical Linguistics at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Most recently he was an Associate Professor of Linguistics at Harvard University. He is the author and editor of various books on syntax, minimalism and language (from a biolinguistic perspective). He is also the founding co-editor, with Kleanthes K. Grohmann, of the Open Access journal Biolinguistics. The interview came to fruition after we had the idea of asking various linguists the following question: “What is the right place for linguistics?”. At first, we were looking for short, straightforward answers. The question soon proved to be hard to approach that way, and Prof. Cedric Boeckx was kind enough to accept our invitation for a more thorough elaboration on the subject, under the “Interview” section of our journal, which he generously granted us on November 7th, 2011, at the Faculty of Letters of the University of Porto, a day before his “Introduction to Biolinguistics” workshop, also there, and for which we are also very thankful. This text is a virtually word-for-word transcription of the recorded 2-hour long interview, subject only to minor revisions by our editorial team and some comments by the interviewee. We hope that the final result is of interest to students, researchers and people alike. Pedro Tiago Martins (PTM) After more or less a century without discussing the issue of the origin of the human language – it was even declared as a kind of taboo among linguists – linguistics has recently turned itself again to this area of research.
    [Show full text]
  • What Connects Biolinguistics and Biosemiotics?
    What Connects Biolinguistics and Biosemiotics? Prisca Augustyn This paper reviews the background, fundamental questions, current issues, and goals of biolinguistics and biosemiotics. The purpose of this paper is to give a brief history of these movements, to clarify common objectives and areas of overlap, to evaluate recent articulations of their respective future agendas, and to address some aspects of focus and disciplinary prejudice that may stand in the way of productive collaboration concerning the biology of language. Keywords: biolinguistics; biosemiotics; Chomsky; Jacob; Lorenz; Peirce; Sebeok; Uexküll 1. Origins of Biolinguistics and Biosemiotics While the scholarly agendas of biolinguistics and biosemiotics may seem very different in scope, they unequivocally share a common interest in human language as a species-specific cognitive tool. They also share a philosophical core that is anchored in the concepts of Peircean abduction and Uexküllian Umwelt (cf. Augustyn 2009) on the one hand, and an interest in the building blocks of life and its underlying principles that has connected language to research in cell biology (cf. Barbieri 2010) on the other hand. Uexküll’s concept of Umwelt — the subjective species-specific world created by an organism — is central to the ethological approach to human language shared by biolinguists and biosemioticians; and both movements have interacted in different ways with molecular biology to explore the Bauplan of human language and/or the semiotic capacities of various species. Examining the ways in which these interests intersect and diverge in biolinguistics and biosemiotics is the main objective of this paper. Like Peirce, Uexküll approached nature and culture through the analysis of signs and sign processes; and his concept of Funktionskreis has been reinterpreted as a general model of semiosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Pluralism in Service of Biolinguistics
    Biological pluralism in service of biolinguistics Pedro Tiago Martins1, Evelina Leivada2, Antonio Ben´ıtez-Burraco3, and Cedric Boeckx2,4 1Pompeu Fabra University 2University of Barcelona 3University of Huelva 4Catalan Institute for Advanced Studies Abstract The aim of this chapter is to offer a fresh perspective on what has come to be known as biolinguistics, a term which, in our view, encompasses all research and methods devoted to the unveiling of the biological foundations of human language. More specifically, our aim is twofold: first, we point out some of the shortcomings of the naive view of biology that has been in place in linguistics since the 1950s and 1960s, namely the notion of the faculty of language as a novelty and the sharp distinction between I- and E-language, which, we contend, has not provided any major insights into the biological nature of language; second, we offer some of the insights from biology, which may provide the theoretical and methodological framework which allows for a truly biological study of language, and thus for a re-hauled biolinguistics Chomsky (1957). 1 Introduction The first sign of a biological orientation for the study of language was the work of Noam Chomsky and Eric Lenneberg, among just a few others, who in the 1950s and 1960s rejected the structuralist linguistics of the time, believing instead that languages, despite meticulously described, were not explained as a natural phenomenon. The overarching assumption of their work is that 1 languages are not learned in the conventional sense of the term (i.e. the way one would learn a craft or how to play a musical instrument), but rather a product of a biologically determined and biologically constrained capacity of humans, located in the brain, which must be innate.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Experimental Syntax for Biolinguistics? Author(S) Fujita, Koji
    Title Experimental Syntax for Biolinguistics? Author(s) Fujita, Koji Citation (2009) Issue Date 2009-11-15 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/87611 Right c Koji Fujita Type Presentation Textversion publisher Kyoto University Language evolution (and development) Experimental Syntax boils down to the emergence of: for Biolinguistics? Recursive Unbounded Merge Interfaces Lexicon Koji Fujita cf. FLN / FLB dichotomy Kyoto University 1 3 Real-time Grammar (Phillips' theses): Biolinguistics: Human language is "implementation Naturalization, or biologization, of human dependent." language faculty (biosyntax, biosemantics, etc.) Grammar is a real-time structure building system. Design Derivation proceeds mostly from left Development (top) to right (bottom). Evolution C. Phillips & S. Lewis. Derivational order in syntax: Evidence and architectural consequences. 2 4 Grammar = Parser? FLN? Competence TP What a cognitive system could achieve John 3 with unbounded resources T 3 VP FLB? Performance John3 saw3 the girl What it can achieve when it is subject to real-life resource limitations Mismatch between derivations and Phylogeny/ontogeny? C. Phillips & M. Wagers. Relating structure and time in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 5 7 Major Issues: Unbounded Merge "… unbounded Merge is not only a genetically determined property of language, but also unique Mismatch between Theoretical and Psycho-/ to it." Neuro-Linguistics Lack of Comparative Methods "… for both evolution and development, there seems to be little reason to suppose that there were Modularity as an end result of evolution & precursors to unbounded Merge." development - N. Chomsky 6 8 Pirahã: A Language without Recursion? Unbounded, recursive Merge: Competence Cross-linguistic variations: Performance ti gái -sai kó'oi hi kaháp -ií I say-old.info Kó'oi he leave-intention "..
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Transformational Grammar
    Introduction to Transformational Grammar Kyle Johnson University of Massachusetts at Amherst Fall 2004 Contents Preface iii 1 The Subject Matter 1 1.1 Linguisticsaslearningtheory . 1 1.2 The evidential basis of syntactic theory . 7 2 Phrase Structure 15 2.1 SubstitutionClasses............................. 16 2.2 Phrases .................................... 20 2.3 Xphrases................................... 29 2.4 ArgumentsandModifiers ......................... 41 3 Positioning Arguments 57 3.1 Expletives and the Extended Projection Principle . ..... 58 3.2 Case Theory and ordering complements . 61 3.3 Small Clauses and the Derived Subjects Hypothesis . ... 68 3.4 PROandControlInfinitives . .. .. .. .. .. .. 79 3.5 Evidence for Argument Movement from Quantifier Float . 83 3.6 Towards a typology of infinitive types . 92 3.7 Constraints on Argument Movement and the typology of verbs . 97 4 Verb Movement 105 4.1 The “Classic” Verb Movement account . 106 4.2 Head Movement’s role in “Verb Second” word order . 115 4.3 The Pollockian revolution: exploded IPs . 123 4.4 Features and covert movement . 136 5 Determiner Phrases and Noun Movement 149 5.1 TheDPHypothesis ............................. 151 5.2 NounMovement............................... 155 Contents 6 Complement Structure 179 6.1 Nouns and the θ-rolestheyassign .................... 180 6.2 Double Object constructions and Larsonian shells . 195 6.3 Complement structure and Object Shift . 207 7 Subjects and Complex Predicates 229 7.1 Gettingintotherightposition . 229 7.2 SubjectArguments ............................. 233 7.2.1 ArgumentStructure ........................ 235 7.2.2 The syntactic benefits of ν .................... 245 7.3 The relative positions of µP and νP: Evidence from ‘again’ . 246 7.4 The Minimal Link Condition and Romance causatives . 254 7.5 RemainingProblems ............................ 271 7.5.1 The main verb in English is too high .
    [Show full text]
  • Adventures 'Frstar Pirate Battles the Murder Monsters of Mercury P L a N E T
    No 4 $4.50 , Toles of Scientif iction Adventures 'frStar Pirate battles the murder monsters of Mercury P l a n e t A \ s v Monorail to Eternity by Carl Jacobi Number Four Agril 1988 CONTENTS The Control Room 2 Monorail to Eternity................... Carl Jacobi 3 Condemned by the Rulers of an alien world to endless, aimless flight beneath the planet's surface! Planet in Peril Lin Carter 27 Star Pirate battles the murder monsters of Mer c u r y ! Zeppelins of the V o i d .............. Jason Rainbow 43 Can even galactic vigilante Solar Smith de­ feat the pernicious pirates of space? What Hath M e ? ........................ Henry Kuttner 55 He felt the lifeblood being sucked out of him— deeper stabbled the gelid cold . then the voice came, "Crush the heart!" Ethergrams........................................... 77 We've got quite a crew assembled some years back for the ill-starred here for our latest madcap mission pulp Spicy Zeppelin Stories before into make-believe mayhem! Me, I'm that mag folded. Alas! Finally, Captain Astro, and my trusty crew our terrific "Tales from the Time- of raygun-slingers are just itching Warp" features Henry Kuttner's "What to see some extraterrestrial action. Hath Me?," a neglected classic from Let me introduce you. First off, Planet Stories. Thanks to space- there's Carl Jacobi, veteral of pulps hounds Robert Weinberg who suggested from Startling Stories to Comet Sci­ this one and Dan Gobbett who dredged ence Fiction, bringing you this time up a copy for us! With a team like another atom-smashing epic from
    [Show full text]
  • Science Fiction Films of the 1950S Bonnie Noonan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 "Science in skirts": representations of women in science in the "B" science fiction films of the 1950s Bonnie Noonan Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Noonan, Bonnie, ""Science in skirts": representations of women in science in the "B" science fiction films of the 1950s" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3653. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3653 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. “SCIENCE IN SKIRTS”: REPRESENTATIONS OF WOMEN IN SCIENCE IN THE “B” SCIENCE FICTION FILMS OF THE 1950S A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English By Bonnie Noonan B.G.S., University of New Orleans, 1984 M.A., University of New Orleans, 1991 May 2003 Copyright 2003 Bonnie Noonan All rights reserved ii This dissertation is “one small step” for my cousin Timm Madden iii Acknowledgements Thank you to my dissertation director Elsie Michie, who was as demanding as she was supportive. Thank you to my brilliant committee: Carl Freedman, John May, Gerilyn Tandberg, and Sharon Weltman.
    [Show full text]