DOCSLIB.ORG

Waiheke Local Board Meeting Held on 27/09/2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waiheke Local Board Meeting Held on 27/09/2018 Chair’s report: Waiheke Local Board Month to 18 Sept 2018 Ngā mihi Waiheke Te Korowai O Waiheke (previously Predator Free Waiheke) The coalition of most of Waiheke’s predator control groups has been so successful that the group, has now secured approximately $11m of Government, Council and Foundation North funding to support their ambitions and plans to make Waiheke predator-free by 2025. The local board has supported the build of this coalition of community groups and congratulated them and the new trust board that will oversee the project at the launch of the campaign on Sunday 16 September at a hui hosted by Piritahi Marae. Piritahi Marae and Auckland Council officers led by Deryn Dromgoole (Waiheke’s resident biosecurity officer), are to be commended as are the High Schools’ Kapa Haka group and hospitality students for hosting such a large and future-focussed ceremony and celebration. The grant funds now provide the opportunity to rebuild the health of many of Waiheke’s natural ecosystems which have been significantly depleted and which are under further serious threat. Youth mini-conference On Saturday 15 September the island’s youth representatives, Youth Voice, collaborating with Doris Aoine and Rozanne Gold of the Rock hosted their own highly successful mini-conference, designed to bring young people together to help capture their aspirations and ideas for the islands youth. The outcomes from this mini-conference will themselves feed into the business case being developed to establish a permanent youth centre on the island. Auckland Transport The board has had two important meetings on Waiheke with Auckland Transport in recent weeks. On 17 August Shane Ellison, Chief Executive of Auckland Transport met for a comprehensive review of all matters of concern to the board. Issues covered ranged from road maintenance schedules, Matiatia’s redevelopment, progress on footpaths and cycleways, road safety, ferry issues, through to the dangerous state of the loop road at the eastern end. Council’s survey of Waiheke residents’ perception of AT performance in recent years was discussed as well as the board’s desire to establish a 10-year strategy for Waiheke with AT. Shane Ellison committed to the co-creation of a new Waiheke Local Board /AT relationship and a co-design approach for the future prioritisation of projects. To advance that the board will work with AT in a second workshop to hammer out our shared agenda. On 6 September we met with Auckland Transport’s senior planners from their cycling and walking teams. It was disappointing to learn that cycling has no unallocated budget to support Waiheke’s cycling infrastructure development in the next ten years, and that therefore the board must advocate clearly for alternative means of potentially securing funding for critical cycling infrastructure required for safety on key roadways as those come up for redevelopment (eg Matiatia). The planner for footpaths was more encouraging and we will be working with that team to progress Waiheke priorities. In both cases getting our children and youth safely to school is our first priority. Matiatia The board has now successfully negotiated to resecure the front of the rental car area for public parking, which currently provides approximately 35 more carparks free of charge until such time as Auckland Transport installs a parking machine. Meanwhile Community Facilities is taking over responsibility for the management of the Harbourmasters Building and will shortly complete a condition assessment of the building so the board can evaluate the options for use of that site going forward once current leases expire. Accommodation Providers Targeted Rates (APTR) Online providers are working towards a public meeting involving Council representatives in early October to raise their issues regarding the recent introduction and impacts of both commercial rates and the APTR for Waiheke accommodation providers. They have the advantage of having both the visitor data as well as several hundred Waiheke accommodation homes on their host lists so should be able to provide a great deal of informed data for the meeting. The board has by comparison no detailed information about the impacts as these are held by individual ratepayers and accommodation providers. Housing Strategy The board is working with officers or develop a housing strategy, an initiative pre-figured by the Local Board Plan. The plan itself will be tightly constrained by the board’s role and resources, and the limits of its potential influence so depends on defining those matters where the board can add value. One of those is advocacy and in that capacity the board will submit through Auckland Council to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s reform of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986. Deadlines for such feedback is always tight and precludes the board going to public consultation. However, individuals and organisations can submit direct to MBIE. Project Forever Waiheke Attached is Project Forever Waiheke’s report on the community consultation undertaken in February/March this year. nāku noa Cath Handley Chair ‘Forever Waiheke’ Community views on tourism and development on Waiheke Island 2018 Compiled by Project Forever Waiheke July 2018 Project Forever Waiheke Community Consultation Report July 2018 Table of contents Section I – Community consultation purposes and processes 1 A. Background to community concerns and wishes for Waiheke 2 B. The 2018 community consultation 3 C. Consultation processes 4 1. Community workshop 5 2. Community survey 5 Section II – Findings 7 A. Perceived benefits of tourism for Waiheke 8 1. Impacts of tourism on the island generally 8 2. Impacts of tourism on residents personally 8 B. Residents’ satisfaction with recent development/s on Waiheke 11 1. Main patterns 2. Satisfaction and dissatisfaction with development/s 11 12 C. Urgent action priorities 20 1. Survey respondents’ priorities 20 2. Workshop participants’ priorities, and suggested solutions 21 3. Summary - Why these priorities? 26 4. Recommended urgent actions 26 Section III – Conclusions and direction 30 A. What has changed since 2015-6? 31 B. Where to now? 33 1. Developing sustainable community tourism strategy 33 2. A starting point 33 List of figures Figure 1: 2016 priorities – ‘What we love about Waiheke’ 2 Figure 2: 2016 community concerns 3 Figure 3: Urgent action priorities 20 Figure 4: 2018 main community concerns 31 Figure 5: Draft sustainable community tourism for Waiheke Island 35 Figure 6: Respondent residence 36 Figure 7: Years resident on Waiheke Island 36 Figure 8: Respondent home ownership 37 i Project Forever Waiheke Community Consultation Report July 2018 List of figures (cont) Figure 9: Residents renting homes to tourists 37 Figure 10: Perceived impacts of tourism for Waiheke Island generally 38 Figure 11: Perceived impacts of tourism for residents personally 39 List of tables Table 1: Perceived tourism impacts on the island generally 8 Table 2. Impacts of tourism on residents personally 8 Table 3: Level of satisfaction with recent development on Waiheke 12 Table 4: Priority issues and solutions identified in the community 22 workshop Acknowledgements The Project Forever Waiheke Local Working Group expresses its heartfelt thanks to the community members who gave their input into the community consultation through the workshop and survey for their valuable contributions, the Waiheke Island Local Board for providing essential funding for the Project, mātua George Kahi for supporting the consultation in many vital ways, Auckland Council for making the Surfdale Hall available at no cost, and our partners in the University of Otago Department of Tourism for academic support. ii Project Forever Waiheke Community Consultation Report July 2018 Section I – Community consultation purposes and processes This Section describes the establishment of Project Forever Waiheke, summarises why the community consultation was undertaken and how, outlines its alignment with previous community consultations on Waiheke Island development and community vision, and describes the community stakeholder survey and workshop undertaken. 1 Project Forever Waiheke Community Consultation Report July 2018 A. Background to community concerns and wishes for Waiheke In 2015, a ‘refresh’ consultation was undertaken by the Waiheke Island Local Board with the Waiheke community, to build on earlier community consultations to identify the wishes and concerns of the local community in relation to the island. The consultation report, Essentially Waiheke 2016 ‘Refresh’, summarised the background and key findings of the consultation as follows (excerpted from that report, pp 9-12): “Back in 1997, the community of Waiheke Island came together to ‘produce a strategy that would provide a framework for development of the island over the next 20-30 years’. Their views, captured over 3 years via community workshops, are articulated in the document ‘Essentially Waiheke - a village and rural communities strategy’ (2000, 2005). The document was then commissioned and adopted by Auckland Council (2000) aiming at informing council and regional planning staff. As part of an original agreement of being revised every 5 years, the document had its first (and so far last) revision (with no community consultation) in 2005. Almost 20 years later, the document still has its relevance and respect, and some recognition in sectors of the community. Within Council and CCOs it is still referred as the ‘go to’ document for Waiheke Island. … What is the Waiheke character? In our everyday speech we refer to character of place. … The Waiheke character is connected to the essence of the island as an entity, to its natural life principle or mauri – which is an essential source of emotions, clearly embodied by residents and visitors alike… Waiheke’s coastline and beaches, native bush cover, informal villages and low-density residential areas all contribute to the island’s strong sense of character. People here have a strong connection to the land and this relationship is expressed through the many community initiatives. Most locals not only live on Waiheke but also for Waiheke.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chief Executive's Report Corporate
    Board Meeting | 25 November 2014 Agenda Item no.8 Open Session Chief Executive’s Report Recommendation: That the Chief Executive’s report be received. Prepared by: Dr David Warburton, Chief Executive Corporate Employee Engagement Preparations commenced this month for our 2015 employee engagement survey in March. This will be the third year of running the annual survey and our aim is to see a lift on last year’s measurement which showed an engagement level of 67%, from an 86% response rate. Since the first survey undertaken in 2013, the results have been used to develop a number of programmes to increase engagement across the organisation. Leadership Development A new project is about to commence to develop a Managers’ Toolkit. The toolkit is designed to increase the capability and ownership of leaders to deliver core people management activities (such as recruitment, engagement, performance development, managing misconduct), and consolidate many of the HR guidelines, support and tools they need in one place. Dr John McEwan (also known as Dr Stress) spoke with the CDD leadership team on how to eliminate the hazards of stress. This presentation was very well received by all those who attended. Succession Planning/Career Development The succession planning/career development project for the ELT continues in preparation for upcoming career conversations with staff. Customer Service Metrics x Average call wait time: AT Public Transport 15 seconds, HOP 17 seconds x Service level: AT Public Transport 78%, HOP 80%, AT Specialist Team - core hours 74.46% x Abandonment of call: AT Public Transport 5%, HOP 5%, AT Specialist Team – core hours -50% x Call volumes: AT Public Transport 30,753, HOP 11,062, AT Specialist Team – core hours 19,732 Board Meeting | 25 November 2014 Agenda Item no.8 Open Session Business Technology Support processes from Business Technology are being improved by BT and Fujitsu.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tourism in Auckland with a Case Study of Waiheke Island
    Sustainable Tourism in Auckland with a case study of Waiheke Island Ronnie Xu Master of Professional Practice Otago Polytechnic Supported by ATEED (Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development) Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SYNOPSIS AND BACKGROUND 4 3. RESEARCH PROCESS AND AIMS 16 4. WAIHEKES’S OVERVIEW 19 5. IMPACTS TO WAIHEKE TOURISM 23 6. STRATEGIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 41 7. CONCLUSION 44 8. REFERENCES 45 1. Introduction Sustainable tourism can be defined as "Tourism that takes full account of its current and future economic, social and environmental impacts, addressing the needs of visitors, the industry, the environment and host communities" (United Nations World Tourism Organisation, 2005). When we read the “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” and the “Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21), which were published by United Nations (UN), we can understand the significance, value, vision, goals and targets of sustainable development for the planet in the next decades. United Nations will take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets were announced which demonstrated the scale and ambition of this new universal Agenda. These goals are integrated and indivisible and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: being economic, social and environmental. Furthermore, United Nations has declared 2017 as the International Year of Sustainable Tourism for Development and it has continued to promote this by World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) since December 2015. There is a clear understanding for its goal and relation to “the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”.
    [Show full text]
  • S77 Fullers P12-17.Pdf
    REFIT NEARLY AS GGOODOOD AASS NNEWEW BY KEITH INGRAM he changing nature of our maritime industry is one of the holidaymakers with weekend baches, the retired and alternative key factors that tends to keep mariners on their toes, or lifestylers. Waiheke would quickly become a suburb of Auckland not, as the case may be. Not only is the way we go about within an easy daily commute of the central business district. our businesses in a flux of change, so to is the manner The success of the QuickCat lead to the fleet’s replacement as Tin which we manage our ships to meet ever-changing market commuter demand grew, until today Fullers has 16 modern, fast demands. vessels of many sizes servicing the people of Auckland. When it comes to moving people, Fullers Auckland would Some of the vessels were purpose-built by Fullers to meet have to be streets ahead not only of the rest of the maritime fleet, specific needs of commuters, and many have been opportunist but also in many cases some other modes of transport, as they purchases to meet demands in growth or to ensure vessels shift somewhere equivalent to our national population annually of a departing operator were not lost as important backups. across the waters of the Waitemata Harbour and Hauraki Gulf. Others have been imported second-hand from successful tourist It all started way back in 1860 when the little paddle steamer operators in Tasmania as they have maintained their fleet Emu first crossed from the city to the North Shore.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Hydrographic Risk Assessment - National Overview
    Hydrographic Authority LAND INFORMATION NEW ZEALAND NEW ZEALAND HYDROGRAPHIC RISK ASSESSMENT - NATIONAL OVERVIEW Report Number: 15NZ326-A Issue: 01 Date: 28 July 2016 MARICO MARINE NEW ZEALAND LTD Report No: 15NZ326‐A Unrestricted Issue No: 01 NZ Hydrographic Risk Overview Report LAND INFORMATION NEW ZEALAND NEW ZEALAND HYDROGRAPHIC RISK ASSESSMENT - NATIONAL OVERVIEW Prepared for: Land Information New Zealand Author(s): John Riding; Jennifer Roberts; Gianis Priovolos Checked By: John Riding Date Release Prepared Authorised Notes 14/06/2016 Draft A GP/JR/JR JFR Draft to Client and QA 28/07/2017 Issue 01 JR/GER/JR JFR Client Issue Note : The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the New Zealand Government. Marico Marine NZ Ltd Level 11 156 Willis Street Wellington 6011 New Zealand 28/07/2016 15NZ326‐A NZHRA National Overview Issue 1 28‐07‐2016 Page ii Report No: 15NZ326‐A Unrestricted Issue No: 01 NZ Hydrographic Risk Overview Report CONTENTS Abbreviations 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background .................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Project Scope ............................................................................................... 5 1.3 Official Nautical Charts ................................................................................ 5 1.4 Data Used in the Project .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Sadlier [Mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, 17 December 2018 3:57 P.M
    From: Daniel Sadlier [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, 17 December 2018 3:57 p.m. To: RCregulatorysupport central Cc: [email protected]; Haylee Minoprio (AT) Subject: BUN60327622 - Queens Wharf West: submission on behalf of Fullers Group Limited and 360 Discovery Limited To whom it may concern, Please find attached submission on behalf of Fullers and 360 Discovery. Kind regards, Daniel Daniel Sadlier PARTNER ddi. +64 9 306 0748 mobile. +64 21 441 653 fax. +64 9 358 5215 email. [email protected] Level 17, Vero Centre, 48 Shortland Street PO Box 1509, Auckland, New Zealand DX CP 22003 Download parking map and instructions here - A4 PDF www.ellisgould.co.nz Please consider the environment before printing this email. This email contains information which is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you must not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this email or attachments. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return email, facsimile or telephone and delete this mail. Ellis Gould is not responsible for any changes made to this email or to any documents after transmission from Ellis Gould. PLEASE NOTE: As a consequence of recent changes to the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009, from 1 July 2018 law firms will be required to collect additional information from clients undertaking certain categories of activity. We will advise you if we need to obtain such information from you. You can read more about the law change here.
    [Show full text]
  • Concession Reconsideration (PDF, 442K
    Fullers Group Limited – Reconsideration Decision Report to Decision Maker To: Mike Slater, Deputy Director General Operations Action Required: To make a decision on the Reconsideration of the Fullers Group Limited Concession application as ordered by the Supreme Court Concession Applicant: Fullers Group Limited Permission Record Number: 38065-GUI The purpose of this report is to reconsider the concession application made in 2013 by Fullers in relation to guiding activities on Rangitoto and Motutapu Islands as directed by the Supreme Court on 14 December 2018 as a result of a Judicial review taken by Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Tribal Trust. The Supreme Court ordered that the reconsideration is undertaken in light of its judgment. Task Assignment: DOC-6089016 _____________________________ Di Clendon Senior Permissions Advisor Date: 26 November 2020 - 1 – Fullers Group Limited - Reconsideration Report - 38065-GUI - DOC-6152681 Permission number: 38065-GUI Page 2 Executive Summary 1. The Supreme Court released its decision in Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Tribal Trust v Minister of Conservation [2018] NZSC 122 on 14 December 2018. The case concerned the Department’s consideration of Treaty principles in the granting of two commercial concessions in 2015 on Motutapu and Rangitoto islands (the motu) to Fullers Group Limited (Fullers) and the Motutapu Island Restoration Trust (MRT). 2. The Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Tribal Trust (the Trust) argued that DOC had not properly given effect to Treaty principles when granting the concessions. The Trust argued that granting concessions other than to tangata whenua would limit or remove opportunities for Māori, whether economic or otherwise and economic opportunities should be preserved for iwi/hapū given their mana whenua over the islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Fullers Group and Kiwi
    Public Version ISSN No. 0114-2720 11.4/11704 Decision No. 674 Determination pursuant to the Commerce Act 1986 in the matter of an application for clearance of a business acquisition involving: Fullers Group Limited and Kiwi Kat Limited The Commission: Mark Berry Peter JM Taylor Susan Begg Summary of Application: The acquisition by Fullers Group Limited of most of the assets of the business called 360 Discovery operated by Kiwi Kat Limited. Determination: Pursuant to section 66(3)(a) of the Commerce Act 1986, the Commission determines to give clearance for the proposed acquisition. Date of Determination: 30 June 2009 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL IN THIS REPORT IS CONTAINED IN SQUARE BRACKETS 1 THE PROPOSAL 1. On 8 June 2009, the Commerce Commission (the Commission) received a notice pursuant to s 66(1) of the Commerce Act 1986 (the Act). The notice sought clearance for the acquisition by Fullers Group Limited of most of the assets of the business called 360 Discovery operated by Kiwi Kat Limited. 2. Kiwi Kat’s largest vessel, the Discovery V, is not part of the acquisition. [ ] ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK 3. The first step of the Commission’s analytical framework1 for assessing applications for clearance is to determine the relevant market or markets. To do this, the Commission identifies the areas of overlap between the acquirer and the target, and then considers what, if any, products and geographic regions, constitute relevant close substitutes from both a customer’s and a supplier’s point of view. 4. The Commission uses a forward-looking type of analysis to assess whether a lessening of competition is likely, so an important subsequent step is to establish the appropriate hypothetical future scenarios, with and without the proposed acquisition.
    [Show full text]
  • Awarded Contracts FY20
    AUCKLAND TRANSPORT CONTRACT INFORMATION Contract Number Contract Description Successful Supplier Contract Award Value Contract Create Date 102-19-743-BT BODY WORN CAMERAS BUSINESS DEPLOYMENT CERT SYSTEMS LTD $75,175 1 July 2019 250-13-848-BT MICROSOFT FINDME MICROSOFT NEW ZEALAND LIMITED $46,288 1 July 2019 336-20-001-TTG CENTRAL BUS STOP PACKAGE - 15 SITES AECOM NEW ZEALAND LIMITED $46,750 1 July 2019 360-19-662-PS PANMURE SWIVEL BRIDGE - HERITAGE NZ AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS CLOUGH & ASSOCIATES - ROD CLOUGH $38,100 1 July 2019 364-19-682-AC TAMAKI DRIVE CYCLE ROUTE CONSTRUCTION SERVICE RELOCATION VISIONSTREAM PTY LIMITED $80,806 1 July 2019 369-20-005-PS ORMISTON MAIN STREET LINK - PEER REVIEW OPUS INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS LIMI $8,150 1 July 2019 488-19-106-PW3 TAHAROTO ROAD AND KARAKA ST INTERSECTION SIGNALS NAYLER CONTRACTORS LIMITED $219,525 1 July 2019 488-19-770-AC MANUKAU ROAD AND KING EDWARD AVE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING FACILITIES VECTOR LIMITED $37,017 1 July 2019 104-19-775-GS ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LEAD Cathryn Boyd $31,200 2 July 2019 342-19-699-PS STAAI BUS PRIORITY AND CYCLING DESIGN AURECON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED $1,277,930 2 July 2019 343-19-711-PS DOMINION RD DD BUS - PUBLIC NOTIFICATION & HEARING SUPPORT FOR VERANDAH RESOURCE CONSENT GHD LIMITED $187,990 2 July 2019 363-19-757-PS THE STRAND, TAMAKI DRIVE AND SOLENT STREET IMPROVEMENTS BOFFA MISKELL LIMITED $44,500 2 July 2019 366-19-734-PS CBD GATEWAYS PLANNING ASSESSMENT CAMPBELL BROWN PLANNING LIMITED $17,300 2 July 2019 438-19-321-GS AT AMBASSADORS - CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
    [Show full text]
  • Destination AKL 2025 Supplementary Report
    Destination AKL 2025 A new direction for Auckland's visitor economy SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT SUPPLEMENTARY 1 DESTINATION AKL STRATEGY - SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION | Contents 1. ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT ______________________________________________ 4 2. SCOPE & BOUNDARY _________________________________________________ 5 2.1 Geographical scope of the Strategy __________________________ 5 3. FULL LIST OF CONSULTATION __________________________________________ 6 3.1 Who was consulted _________________________________________ 6 3.2 Industry Leaders Group ______________________________________ 7 3.3 Organisations represented __________________________________ 8 4. SETTING THE SCENE _________________________________________________ 9 4.1 About Auckland _____________________________________________ 9 4.2 Our people ________________________________________________ 11 4.3 Our visitors _________________________________________________ 12 4.4 Value of the visitor economy _________________________________ 18 5. SURVEYS ____________________________________________________________ 20 5.1 Auckland industry stakeholder survey __________________________ 20 5.2 Auckland visitor survey (domestic market) ______________________ 24 6. AUCKLAND AS A COMPETITIVE DESTINATION CITY _______________________ 31 6.1 Defining competitiveness ____________________________________ 31 6.2 The cities assessed _________________________________________ 32 6.3 The results of the benchmarking ______________________________ 32 6.4 Auckland’s performance in each category _____________________
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Review 2016 SOUTER INVESTMENTS IS the INVESTMENT OFFICE of the SOUTER FAMILY
    Investment Review 2016 SOUTER INVESTMENTS IS THE INVESTMENT OFFICE OF THE SOUTER FAMILY ir Brian Souter co-founded Stagecoach Group plc as a start-up in 1980. Today the company is a leading international transport group, with extensive operations in the UK, United States and Canada, S employing around 40,000 people and operating nearly 11,000 buses and 2,300 daily rail services. Stagecoach floated in 1993 and is listed in the FTSE 250. Sir Brian is Chairman of the company, having stepped down from his role as Chief Executive Officer four years ago. When Sir Brian founded Souter Investments in 2006, more than two thirds of his portfolio was represented by his Stagecoach shareholding, with the remainder invested in a diverse number of managed funds, and a smaller portfolio of unquoted and property investments. Private equity focus Today the balance is very different. Our primary focus is on unquoted investments, and whilst Stagecoach is still a major part of the portfolio it now only represents 34% of total assets. We are sector agnostic, and invest across a wide range of industries, including financial and business services, consumer goods, healthcare, telecoms and industrials. Although not our primary focus, transport will always be an area of interest given Sir Brian’s background. Together our unquoted companies have a turnover of almost £2bn and employ over 19,000 people worldwide. A professional but flexible Our team investment approach The Souter Investments team encompasses a mix We employ high standards of professional of investment professionals and support staff, with diligence and rigour in selecting, executing and offices in Edinburgh and Perth.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiheke Island Sustainable Community and Tourism Strategy 2019-2024
    Waiheke Island Sustainable Community and Tourism Strategy 2019-2024 Developed by Project Forever Waiheke for the Waiheke Island Local Board and the Waiheke community, 26 February 2019 Waiheke Sustainable Community And Tourism Strategy 2019-2024 Prepared by Project Forever Waiheke for the Waiheke Local Board Outline of the Strategy document Chapter 1 provides a summary of why a Waiheke Sustainable Community And Tourism Strategy was seen as needed and the process through which it has been developed. Chapter 2 describes the current situation on Waiheke in relation to its communities and rapidly increasing tourism, and how community and tourism interact. Chapter 3 outlines the vision, principles and key goals of the Waiheke Sustainable Community And Tourism Strategy. Chapter 4 sets out 14 strategic action areas, including some proposed actions and long- term targets recommended by Waiheke locals, including people engaged in the tourism sector. Acknowledgements Project Forever Waiheke’s Local Working Group would like to express its thanks to the hundreds of local residents and members of particular interest groups who took part in the community consultation and provided feedback on an earlier draft of this Strategy, providing valuable input and guidance in developing this document. We also wish to thank the Strategy Sub-Committee for the many hours of work that have gone into producing the first ever Waiheke Sustainable Community And Tourism Strategy. We congratulate the Waiheke Local Board for its willingness to collaborate closely with a
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Papers
    AGENDA PAPERS Te Rūnanga Papa Atawhai o Tāmaki Makaurau AUCKLAND CONSERVATION BOARD AGENDA FOR THE 146TH MEETING OF THE AUCKLAND CONSERVATION BOARD TO BE HELD VIA ONLINE VIDEO CONFERENCE, FROM 8.30AM ON WEDNESDAY 3 JUNE 2020 MEMBERS: Ms Lyn Mayes Chairperson Dr Andrew Jeffs Board member Mr Nathan Kennedy Ngā Mana Whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau – Marutūāhu rōpū Mr Fale Lesa Board member Ms Nicola MacDonald Board member Mr Malcolm Page Board member Mrs Robin Taua-Gordon Ngā Mana Whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau – Waiohua Tāmaki rōpū Mr Glenn Wilcox Ngā Mana Whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau – Ngāti Whātua rōpū Ms Natalie Hansby Board Member Dr José Derraik Board Member Mr Pengbo Jiang Board Member Ms Kate Waterhouse Board Member Auckland Conservation Board Te Rūnanga Papa Atawhai o Tāmaki Makaurau 3 June 2020 Virtual Meeting Action D Decision Required A Advice Required I Information Only Agenda Item Time Topic Speaking/Lead Action Page 1 8.30am Welcome Chair I Board Administration 2 8.35am Apologies Chair A 3 8.40am Confirm Agenda Chair D 4 8.45am Conflicts of Interest for the Meeting Chair A 1 5 8.50am Minutes Chair D 2 6 8.55am Actions Chair A 11 7 9.00am Correspondence Chair D 16 8 9.05am Budget Chair I (tabled) 9 9.15am Forward Meeting Schedule Chair D 18 Governance 10 9.20am Chair’s Report Chair I 19 11 9.30am Annual Work Plan Priorities Chair D 23 12 9.45am Director’s Report Ops Director I 27 13 9.55am Operation Managers’ Report Ops Managers I 29 14 10.05am Partnerships Group Report Partnerships I 39 10.15am Morning Tea (15mins Break) Governance Continued
    [Show full text]