Coal Liquefaction and Desulfurization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coal Liquefaction and Desulfurization COAL LIQUEFACTION AND DESULFURIZATION J. A. GUIN, Y. A. LIU, C. W. CURTIS, A. R. TARRER AND D. C. WILLIAMS The program is presently the Auburn University largest university-based coal research Auburn, AL 36849 program in the Southeastern region, and current support is . .. about $450,000 annually. ALABAMA IS A SIGNIFICANT producer of coal in the United States, particularly in the Gulf province. There are large reserves of coal in Ala­ aspects of the Auburn coal liquefaction research bama; 35 billion tons lie in the northern and program. It has made available its resources and central counties, enough for hundreds of years at facilities at the 6 tons/day solvent-refined-coal our present rate of production. Lignite deposits (SRC) pilot plant located at Wilsonville, Alabama in southern Alabama counties await the technology (90 miles from Auburn) for support of the super­ to properly realize their value. Thus, a strong vised internship and hands-on research training of recommendation of a statewide conference on the Auburn program. The largest utility coal user "Energy and the Future of Alabama" sponsored in the Northeast, the New England Electric by Auburn University in 1972 was for "research, System, has also actively participated in the Au­ development and technical liaison in the areas of burn coal desulfurization research since 1978. coal production, coal processing and coal usage." Auburn University acted upon this recommenda­ COAL RESEARCH FACULTY AND FACILITIES tion, and with major support from the National The Auburn coal liquefaction research program Science Foundation (NSF), established the Au­ is presently being directed by a number of burn Coal Conversion Research Laboratory in chemical engineering faculty, including Drs. J. A. the Department of Chemical Engineering in 1973. Guin, A. R. Tarrer, C. W. Curtis and D. C. Subsequently, with additional support from NSF Williams. These individuals have had extensive in 1975, Auburn University established a Coal coal liquefaction research experience, particularly Preparation Research Laboratory. Since their related to the aspects of transport phenomena, initiation, the Auburn Coal Research Laboratories reaction engineering, analytical chemistry, applied have been heavily involved in the graduate train­ ing of selected M.S. and Ph.D. students in the areas TABLE 1 of coal conversion and utilization. A major thrust of the recent and ongoing research has been Recent Sponsors of the Auburn Coal Rese arch Program placed on coal liquefaction and desulfurization. Disposable catalysts for coal liquefaction: The program is presently the largest university­ Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. based coal research program in the Southeastern Corrosion by coal liquids: Catalytic, Inc. region, and current support for the program is at Catalyst deactivation in coal liquefaction: a level of about $450,000 annually. Recent and Cities Service Research and Development Two-stage coal liquefaction: Electric Power Research current sponsors of the program, summarized in Institute Table 1, have included many industrial organiza­ Visual reactor studies of coal dissolution: tions. Of particular significance is the fact that Gulf Research and Development Company the Southern Company Services, Inc., which is Magnetofluidized beds and coal desulfurization: widely recognized in the area of coal conversion New England Power Service Company Magnetic beneficiation of coal: Union Carbide Corporation technology and applications of coal-derived fuels, Graduate training in coal conversion and utilization: has continued since 1973 to actively support many U.S. Department of Education Solvent refining of coal: U.S. Department of Energy © Copyright ChE D ivision, A SEE, 1981 Dry coal desulfurization: U.S. Department of Energy 178 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDlJGA'nON catalysis and separation processes. Both Drs. selected recent publications and theses from the Guin and Tarrer have served as project managers Auburn coal research program is given at the end for the Fossil Energy Program of the U. S. De­ of this article. partment of Energy, providing the Auburn Labo­ Laboratories containing approximately 4000 ratories with unique and practical insights to the ft2 in the Department of Chemical Engineering ongoing coal conversion research in the country. have been equipped for coal conversion and In addition, Dr. S. C. Worley of the Department utilization studies. Complete laboratory facilities of Chemistry and Dr. B. Tatarchuk, a new chemi­ for high-pressure coal conversion, coal crushing cal engineering faculty in the Fall, 1981, are di­ and grinding, instrumental analysis, wet chemical recting fundamental research related to catalysis analysis and coal preparation research are avail­ in coal liquefaction ; and Dr. R. B. Cook of the able. Complete analytical equipment for standard Department of Geology is directing the geological analyses of coal and coal-derived products is also aspects of coal conversion processes. The Auburn available in the laboratories. In addition, coal desulfurization research program is currently specialized research equipment such as a Fourier being directed by Dr. Y. A. Liu, a chemical engi­ Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer, an X-ray neering faculty member. Fluorescence Spectrometer, a CHONS analyzer During the past few years, the Auburn coal and a superconducting high-intensity magnetic research faculty has become nationally and inter­ separator are available in the laboratories. nationally recognized for its research as well as its scholastic and professional contributions re­ COAL LIQUEFACTION RESEARCH lated to coal liquefaction and desulfurization, and Chemistry and Technology of Coal Liquefaction magnetic separation applied to coal preparation. The research results obtained in the last few years In order to better appreciate the rese~rch have been widely publicized through publication being conducted in coal liquefaction, a brief iook of three books, two patents, and over 150 articles, at coal liquefaction chemistry and technology presentations and seminars. Further, the Auburn is desirable. Coal may be viewed as a large, Laboratories have organized and chaired two organic, amorphous, polymeric-like structure international conferences on coal desulfurization consisting of condensed polynuclear aromatic and magnetic separation (B8, B9), and one systems coupled by methylene-bridge groups, or national conference on the future of coal. A list of heteroatom linkages such as ether or sulfide Y. A. Liv received his S.S. from National Taiwan University, M.S. coal liquefaction, solids/liquid separation, process dynamics and from Tufts University and Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1974. He control, and catalysis. (C) is presently an alumni associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Christine W. Curtis is a research associate in chemical engineering Auburn University. (L) at Auburn University. She received her B.S. from Mercer University and James A. Guin, is a professor of chemical engineering at Auburn M.S. and Ph.D. from Florida State University. Her research interests Uni~ersity. He received his B.S. and M.S. from the University of include coal liquefaction, catalytic upgrading and analysis of coal Alabama and Ph .D. from the University of Texas at Austin. His re• liquids. (RC) search interests include coal liquefaction, reactor design, and catalytic Dennis C. Williams is an assistant professor of chemical engineer­ upgrading of coal liquids. (LC) ing at Auburn University. He received his Ph .D. in chemical engineer­ Authur R. Tarrer is an associate professor of chemical engineering ing from Princeton University in 1980. His research interests include at Auburn University. He received his B.S. from Auburn University and process control, process synthesis, reactor modelling, phase behavior M.S. and Ph.D. from Purdue University. His research interests include effects in coal liquefaction, and numerical methods. (R) FALL 1981 179 groups. Nitrogen is also a significant heteroatom available for subsequent separation and process­ component of the coal structure. The liquefaction ing into the desired clean fuels. A commercial coal of coal is thought to begin with the thermal rup­ liquefaction plant would process about 30,000 ture of scissile linkages at temperatures around tons/ day of raw coal. The only commercial opera­ 375°C with the resulting formation of a large tion of this magnitude today is in South Africa number of free radical species. The key to the where large quantities of liquid fuels are produced liquefaction process is to "cap off" these free via coal gasification and catalytic Fischer-Tropsch radicals by hydrogen addition before they can technology (A3). The direct production of liquid recombine with large coal fragments to form a fuels from coal by solvent extraction-hydrogena­ high-molecular-weight structure. This "donor" tion avoids the gasification step and offers the po­ hydrogen usually comes primarily from a "donor" tential of a more thermally efficient process. A solvent; however, it may also arise from gas­ survey of different coal liquefaction processes phase hydrogen or hydroaromatic portions of the being developed in this country can be found in coal itself. The effective "capping" of these free the excellent surveys by Klass (A4) and Perry radicals leads to the formation of products of (A5). lower molecular weight. If the reaction conditions are severe enough, a liquid product is formed. A Current Scope and Accomplishments Coal liquefaction research at Auburn
Recommended publications
  • Wave Liquefaction™ Combines Gaseous and Solid Hydrocarbons to Cleanly and Efficiently Produce Liquid Fuels Or Chemicals and Ca
    Wave Liquefaction™ The Novel Coal-Biomass to Liquids Process George Skoptsov [email protected] H Quest Vanguard, Inc James Strohm [email protected] 750 William Pitt Way : Pittsburgh, PA 15238 Wave Liquefaction™ With only 15% biomass feed combines gaseous and solid and no CCS, lifecycle CO2 hydrocarbons to cleanly and emissions are 22% less than efficiently produce liquid fuels or for transportation fuels from chemicals and carbon char. Gases Solids Liquids Carbon conventional oil refining. SYNCRUDE COMPOSITION BACKGROUND TECHNOLOGY VERSATILITY Wave Liquefaction™ syncrude yields are Wave Liquefaction™ process was originally developed with the specific goal of establishing Properties of the Wave Liquefaction™ liquid product (aromaticity, density, 50%-65% wt (on dry, ash-free basis). the vast US coal resources as an alternative, cost-effective domestic source of military jet H:C ratio) can be widely varied by adjusting energy input, feedstock and Liquid product flows at room temperature, fuel with the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions below those of a conventional crude oil gas composition. The product aromaticity can be made close to 100%, has API > 10, and < 50% aromaticity. Low refining process. Blending coal with 15% biomass by weight will decrease lifecycle CO2 with as much as 20% of the liquid yield consisting of the BTEX fraction. asphaltene content reduces requirements emissions by more than 20% relative to conventional gasoline production without use of Industrial non-fuel uses for these liquid and solid products include: for downstream hydrotreating needed to any carbon capture or sequestration solutions. Carbon pitch for production of aluminum smelting anodes: produce finished fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Direct Coal Liquefaction
    Energies 2010, 3, 155-170; doi:10.3390/en3020155 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Review Recent Advances in Direct Coal Liquefaction Hengfu Shui 1, Zhenyi Cai 1 and Chunbao (Charles) Xu 2,* 1 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, Anhui, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (Z.C.) 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E1, Canada * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-807-343-8761; Fax: +1-807-343-8928. Received: 16 November 2009 / Accepted: 19 January 2010 / Published: 27 January 2010 Abstract: The growing demand for petroleum, accompanied by the declining petroleum reserves and the concerns over energy security, has intensified the interest in direct coal liquefaction (DCL), particularly in countries such as China which is rich in coal resources, but short of petroleum. In addition to a general introduction on the mechanisms and processes of DCL, this paper overviews some recent advances in DCL technology with respect to the influencing factors for DCL reactions (temperature, solvent, pressure, atmospheres, etc.), the effects of coal pre-treatments for DCL (swelling, thermal treatment, hydrothermal treatment, etc.), as well as recent development in multi-staged DCL processes, DCL catalysts and co-liquefaction of coal with biomass. Keywords: direct coal liquefaction (DCL); processes; influencing factors; coal pre-treatment; catalysts; co-liquefaction; biomass 1. Introduction Due to the rapid increase in demand for petroleum and its declining reserves, the concern over energy security has intensified the interest in coal liquefaction, especially for those countries which are short of oil resources but have abundant coal reserves, such as the United States and China, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • COAL CONFERENCE University of Pittsburgh · Swanson School of Engineering ABSTRACTS BOOKLET
    Thirty-Fifth Annual INTERNATIONAL PITTSBURGH COAL CONFERENCE University of Pittsburgh · Swanson School of Engineering ABSTRACTS BOOKLET Clean Coal-based Energy/Fuels and the Environment October 15-18, 2018 New Century Grand Hotel Xuzhou Hosted by: The conference acknowledges the support of Co-hosted by: K. C. Wong Education Foundation, Hong Kong A NOTE TO THE READER This Abstracts Booklet is prepared solely as a convenient reference for the Conference participants. Abstracts are arranged in a numerical order of the oral and poster sessions as published in the Final Conference Program. In order to facilitate the task for the reader to locate a specific abstract in a given session, each paper is given two numbers: the first designates the session number and the second represents the paper number in that session. For example, Paper No. 25.1 is the first paper to be presented in the Oral Session #25. Similarly, Paper No. P3.1 is the first paper to appear in the Poster Session #3. It should be cautioned that this Abstracts Booklet is prepared based on the original abstracts that were submitted, unless the author noted an abstract change. The contents of the Booklet do not reflect late changes made by the authors for their presentations at the Conference. The reader should consult the Final Conference Program for any such changes. Furthermore, updated and detailed full manuscripts, published in the Conference Proceedings, will be sent to all registered participants following the Conference. On behalf of the Thirty-Fifth Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, we wish to express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Liquefaction Technology for Floating Lng Facilities
    NATURAL GAS LIQUEFACTION TECHNOLOGY FOR FLOATING LNG FACILITIES Dr. Justin D. Bukowski Lead Process Engineer Dr. Yu Nan Liu Technical Director, LNG Dr. Mark R. Pillarella Senior Process Manager, LNG Stephen J. Boccella Lead Mechanical Design Engineer William A Kennington LNG Major Account Manager Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Allentown, PA, USA 18195-1501 [email protected] KEYWORDS: FLNG, refrigeration cycles, DMR, nitrogen recycle ABSTRACT Forecasts for the LNG industry indicate that a large segment of growth will occur through floating LNG (FLNG) development. FLNG facilities present special challenges over those facilities on land. Among these challenges are the response of equipment and processes to wave induced motion of the vessel, weight and space limits for the process equipment on the vessel topsides, difficulty of equipment maintenance and repair or replacement, handling of flammable component inventories, and corrosion. Meeting these challenges requires a mix of analysis, testing, and innovation. To qualify coil wound heat exchangers (CWHE) for FLNG applications, Air Products performed an extensive design verification program. The program included rigorous mechanical analysis of the exchanger, as well as experimental testing of components which were not amenable to analysis. The program also addressed the effects of motion on mixed refrigerant liquefaction process performance through an integrated analytical and experimental investigation of two-phase flow within a CWHE. The results of the mechanical and process verification programs have been applied to CWHE designs for FLNG, including the Shell Prelude FLNG and Petronas FLNG 1 projects. Several process cycles suitable for floating LNG applications are presented. Mixed Refrigerant (MR) processes combine high production and high efficiency for FLNG applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Coal Processing
    Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines COAL PROCESSING WORLD BANK GROUP Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Coal Processing Introduction such as host country context, assimilative capacity of the environment, and other project factors, are taken into account. The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines are The applicability of specific technical recommendations should technical reference documents with general and industry- be based on the professional opinion of qualified and specific examples of Good International Industry Practice experienced persons. When host country regulations differ 1 (GIIP) . When one or more members of the World Bank Group from the levels and measures presented in the EHS are involved in a project, these EHS Guidelines are applied as Guidelines, projects are expected to achieve whichever is more required by their respective policies and standards. These stringent. If less stringent levels or measures than those industry sector EHS guidelines are designed to be used provided in these EHS Guidelines are appropriate, in view of together with the General EHS Guidelines document, which specific project circumstances, a full and detailed justification provides guidance to users on common EHS issues potentially for any proposed alternatives is needed as part of the site- applicable to all industry sectors. For complex projects, use of specific environmental assessment. This justification should multiple industry-sector guidelines may be necessary. A demonstrate that the choice for any alternate performance complete list of industry-sector guidelines can be found at: levels is protective of human health and the environment www.ifc.org/ifcext/enviro.nsf/Content/EnvironmentalGuidelines Applicability The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and measures that are generally considered to be achievable in The EHS Guidelines for Coal Processing cover the processing new facilities by existing technology at reasonable costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefaction, Solidification Or Separation of Gases Or Gaseous
    CPC - F25J - 2019.08 F25J LIQUEFACTION, SOLIDIFICATION OR SEPARATION OF GASES OR GASEOUS {OR LIQUEFIED GASEOUS} MIXTURES BY PRESSURE AND COLD TREATMENT {OR BY BRINGING THEM INTO THE SUPERCRITICAL STATE (cryogenic pumps F04B 37/08; gas storage vessels, gas holders F17; filing vessels with, or discharging from vessels, compressed, liquefied or solidified gases F17C; refrigeration machines, plants, or systems F25B)} Definition statement This place covers: Processes or systems for liquefying or solidifying gases or gaseous mixtures and for separating the constituents of gaseous or liquid mixtures involving the use of liquefaction or solidification by rectification or partial condensation, the processes or systems use internal and/or external refrigeration to reach very low temperatures, i.e. so-called cryogenic temperatures, in general well below -50°C; Arrangements of cold exchangers or cold accumulators in cryogenic separation or liquefaction plants. Relationships with other classification places If the principal aspect of the application concerns the liquefaction or solidification of a gaseous feed stream but comprises also purification aspects of the feed or product stream in general then the main group concerned is F25J 1/00. Similarly, if the principal aspect of the application concerns the separation of a feed stream but comprises also the withdrawal of a liquid or solid product stream then the main group concerned is F25J 3/00. If the application, however, concerns details both about liquefaction or solidification techniques as well
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding the Basic Facts Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding The
    Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding the Basic Facts Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding the “I strongly support developing new LNG capacity in the United States.” —President George W. Bush Page 2 4 Growing Demand Emergence of the for Natural Gas Global LNG Market About This Report Natural gas plays a vital role in One of several proposed the U.S. energy supply and in supply options would involve This report was prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in achieving the nation’s economic increasing imports of liquefied collaboration with the National and environmental goals. natural gas (LNG) to ensure Association of Regulatory Utility that American consumers have Although natural gas production Commissioners (NARUC). DOE’s Office of adequate supplies of natural in North America is projected Fossil Energy supports technology gas in the future. research and policy options to ensure to gradually increase through clean, reliable, and affordable supplies 2025, consumption has begun Liquefaction enables natural of oil and natural gas for American to outpace available domestic gas that would otherwise be consumers, working closely with the National Energy Technology Laboratory, natural gas supply. Over time, “stranded” to reach major which is the Department’s lead center this gap will widen. markets. Developing countries for the research and development of with plentiful natural gas advanced fossil energy technologies. resources are particularly NARUC, a nonprofit organization interested in monetizing composed of governmental agencies engaged in the regulation of natural gas by exporting it as telecommunications, energy, and water LNG. Conversely, more utilities and carriers in the 50 states, the developed nations with little District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and or no domestic natural gas the Virgin Islands, serves the public rely on imports.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Petrology: an Overview
    8 Organic Petrology: An Overview Suárez-Ruiz Isabel Instituto Nacional del Carbón (INCAR-CSIC) Oviedo Spain 1. Introduction Organic Petrology is a branch of the Earth Science that studies fossil organic matter in sedimentary sequences including coal and the finely dispersed organic matter in rocks (DOM). It was developed from coal petrology that dates back to the end of the 19th century. The organic petrology is usually expressed by two fundamental parameters: the nature and proportions of the organic constituents, and by the rank or maturity of these organic components. In the case of coals the amount and composition of its mineral matter (grade of a coal) is another parameter to be taken into account. The work carried out by the International Committee for Coal and Organic Pertrology (ICCP) related to the development of the maceral nomenclature, classification, standardization and the use of petrographic methods has been reported in various editions of the “ International Handbook of Coal Petrology” (ICCP, 1963, 1971, 1975, 1993) and other publications such as ICCP (1998, 2001) and Sýkorová et al. (2005). There are also several monographs focused on organic petrology such as those by Stach et al., (1982) and Taylor et al., (1998). Recently Suárez-Ruiz and Crelling (2008) edited a book on coal petrology and coal utilization. Other references in which organic petrology and/or coal petrology are discussed at some length include Ward (1984); Bustin et al. (1985); Falcon and Snyman (1986); Diessel (1992) and Teichmüller (1989). This chapter is an overview focused on organic petrology (including coal petrology), its fundamental concepts, the analytical techniques and the main current applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Liquefaction
    http://uu.diva-portal.org This is an author produced version of a paper published in International journal of energy research. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination. Citation for the published paper: Höök, M. & Aleklett, K. ”A review on coal-to-liquid fuels and its coal consumption” International journal of energy research, 2010, Vol. 34, Issue 10: 848-864 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.1596 Access to the published version may require subscription. Published in International Journal of Energy Research Volume 34, Issue 10, October 2010, Pages 848-864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.1596 A review on coal to liquid fuels and its coal consumption Mikael Höök*, Kjell Aleklett* Corresponding author: [email protected], phone: +46 18-471 7643, fax: +46 18-4713513 * Uppsala University, Global Energy Systems, Department of physics and astronomy, Box 535, SE-751 21, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Sweden, http://www.fysast.uu.se/ges Abstract Continued reliance on oil is unsustainable and this has resulted in interest in alternative fuels. Coal-to-Liquids (CTL) can supply liquid fuels and have been successfully used in several cases, particularly in South Africa. This article reviews CTL theory and technology. Understanding the fundamental aspects of coal liquefaction technologies are vital for planning and policy-making, as future CTL systems will be integrated in a much larger global energy and fuel utilization system. Conversion ratios for CTL are generally estimated to be between 1-2 barrels/ton coal. This puts a strict limitation on future CTL capacity imposed by future coal production volumes, regardless of other factors such as economics, emissions or environmental concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermoacoustics for Liquefaction of Natural
    R LNG TECHNOLOGY By Greg Swift Thermoacoustics for Los Alamos National Laboratory and John Wollan Liquefaction of Natural Gas Praxair A prototype device for liquefying natural gas using thermoacoustics is capable of producing 500 gallons per day of LNG, consuming 35 percent of the incoming gas in the process. Larger capacities operating at higher efficiencies are on the drawing board. ne ordinarily thinks of a sound In this article, we introduce the the half-wave resonance present in the wave as consisting only of basic principles of thermoacoustics apparatus illustrated by the schematic O coupled pressure and position and describe progress toward their in (c), where the engine is at the top oscillations. In fact, temperature use for liquefaction of natural gas. and the refrigerator is at the bottom. oscillations accompany the pressure Thermoacoustic natural-gas liquefiers Heat exchangers (HX) and a regenerator oscillations and when there are spatial are surprisingly simple: They use no in the engine convert some of the heat gradients in the temperature exotic materials, require no close power (QH) from burning natural gas at oscillations, oscillating heat flow tolerances, and are little more than a hot temperature (TH) into acoustic occurs. The combination of these welded pipe and heat exchangers power (W), rejecting waste heat power oscillations produces a rich variety of filled with pressurized helium. This (Q0) to a water stream at ambient “thermoacoustic” effects. In everyday simplicity, along with the reliability temperature (T0). Acoustic power is life, the thermal effects of sound are too and low maintenance inherent in consumed by the refrigerator, which small to be easily noticed; for example, thermoacoustic technology, suggests uses it to pump heat (QC) from a the amplitude of the temperature that thermoacoustic liquefiers could liquefying natural-gas load and rejects oscillation in conversational levels of enable economic recovery of marginal waste heat (Q´0 + Q˝0) to the ambient sound is only about 0.0001°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Thermochemical Liquefaction Characteristics, Processes and Technologies
    Direct Thermochemical Liquefaction Characteristics, processes and technologies IEA Bioenergy: Task 34 July 2020 Direct Thermochemical Liquefaction Characteristics, processes and technologies Axel Funke, Nicolaus Dahmen IEA Bioenergy: Task 34 July 12020 Copyright © 2020 IEA Bioenergy. All rights Reserved Cover picture by Thomas Zevaco, DOI:10.5445/IR/1000120883 Published by IEA Bioenergy The IEA Bioenergy Technology Collaboration Programme (TCP) is organised under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA) but is functionally and legally autonomous. Views, findings and publications of the IEA Bioenergy TCP do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or its individual member countries Index Introduction ................................................................................................ 2 Biomass Depolymerization Principles ................................................................ 3 Processes for Direct Thermochemical Liquefaction ................................................. 4 Fast Pyrolysis ............................................................................................ 5 Hydrothermal Liquefaction ............................................................................ 7 Solvolysis with organic solvents ...................................................................... 8 Product Conditioning ..................................................................................... 9 Bio-oil Applications ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thermochemical and Catalytic Upgrading in a Fuel Context: Peat, Biomass and Alkenes
    TRITA-KET R 138 ISSN 1104-3466 ISRN KTH/KET/R--138--SE Thermochemical and Catalytic Upgrading in a Fuel Context: Peat, Biomass and Alkenes Christina Hörnell Dissertation Royal Institute of Technology Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology Chemical Technology Stockholm 2001 SAMMANFATTNING Denna avhandling avser metoder för ökad användning av alternativa bränslen. Heterogen oligomerisering av alkener för tillverkning av huvudsakligen bränslen och smörjoljor behandlas också. I Sverige har energieffektiviteten ökat och beroendet av importerad råolja minskat betydligt sedan 70-talet men det finns fortfarande behov av ökad användning av alternativa bränslen. Väsentliga egenskaper hos råmaterialen av intresse för denna avhandling, biomassa och torv, beskrivs, liksom de huvudsakliga förloppen vid termokemisk omvandling. Utvecklingen av teknologierna för förvätskning och förgasning beskrivs. Artikel I redogör för huvuddelen av det arbete som utfördes inom ’Olja ur torv’- projektet vid KTH. I artikel II jämförs upplösningen i tetralin av flera olika råmaterial. Råmaterialens reaktivitet befanns vara biomassa > torv > kol. Artikel III handlar om upplösning av torkad torv i simulerade recirkulerande lösningsmedel. Upplösningsgraden var beroende av lösningsmedlets aromaticitet och halt vätedonerande komponent. Tjäror bildas oundvikligen då biomassa förgasas. Dolomit är en billig och väldokumenterad krackningskatalysator för dessa tjäror, då tillräcklig temperatur och uppehållstid föreligger återstår nästan enbart bensen och naftalen efter krackningen. Artikel IV redovisar en studie av hur tjärnedbrytningen påverkas av att kisel tillsätts en dolomitbädd. Avhandlingen behandlar också heterogen oligomerisering av alkener. Artikel V är en genomgång av publikationer och patent som erhållits inom området heterogen alkenoligomerisering, utvärderade med avseende på använda katalysatorsystem, betingelser och produktselektivitet. Nyckelord: torv, biomassa, förvätskning, tetralin, förgasning, pyrolys, tjärkrackning, dolomit, kisel, heterogen oligomerisering, alkener.
    [Show full text]