DOCSLIB.ORG

IDP Situation Monitoring Initiative (ISMI) CCCM CLUSTER Monthly Overview of IDP Movements in North-West Syria, November 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IDP Situation Monitoring Initiative (ISMI) CCCM CLUSTER Monthly Overview of IDP Movements in north-west Syria, November 2018 Summary of Findings About ISMI & This Factsheet Communities assessed: 563 Following the announcement on 17 September of a demilitarised The IDP Situation Monitoring Initiative (ISMI) is an initiative of the Camp zone (DMZ) to be implemented along the major frontlines of Idleb Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) Cluster, implemented by REACH Total IDP arrivals:1 25,041 (19%)2 governorate and surrounding areas, many parts of opposition-held and supported by cluster members. north-west Syria saw reduced levels of displacement in October, 2,4 Following a baseline assessment conducted at the end of 2016, weekly, bi- Total IDP departures:3 44,649 (33%) compared to the preceding months. With November, however, weekly and now monthly data collection cycles were initiated. This factsheet came a renewal in hostilities between Government of Syria (GoS)- presents an overview of reported inward and outward movements of IDPs from Total IDP arrivals and IDP departures by region: allied forces and armed opposition groups (AOGs) in several parts 1 to 30 November 2018. Such displacements were reported in 563 communities of the DMZ. These contributed to the 16,417 total IDP arrivals and 35,783 in sub-districts monitored by ISMI. The coverage map in this section shows the 35,783 IDP departures reported from assessed communities in Idleb sub-districts that were monitored for the most recent round of data collection, and surrounding areas, many of which were concentrated in Al Ma’ra as well as the communities reporting movements. ISMI monitoring coverage district. Substantial IDP departure waves were reported in particular varies over time depending on access. Displacements are identified through from Jarjnaz (12,107) community in Ma’arrat An Nu’man sub-district, 5 an extensive key informant (KI) network, either from alerts initiated by KIs 16,417 driven by aerial bombardments throughout the month. or from follow-up by enumerators. At least two KIs are interviewed in each In parallel, in northern Aleppo governorate, large-scale security assessed community, and collected information is further triangulated through 8,624 8,866 operations were conducted in several major cities and urban centres other sources, including CCCM member data and humanitarian updates. This during November, including in Al Bab, Afrin, Azaz and Jarablus.6 approach allows for regular updates on IDP movements at the community These, combined with ongoing inter-AOG tensions and poor level across sub-districts monitored by ISMI in north-west Syria. Idleb and surrounding areas Northern Aleppo region humanitarian conditions reportedly contributed to the 8,624 total The data used for this product was collected, triangulated and verified based 46+100+ 24+25+ IDP arrivals and 8,866 IDP departures across the region. on submissions from ISMI’s network and select CCCM cluster members ■ IDP arrivals ■ IDP departures following the ISMI methodology. Due to differences in methodology and 4 Al Jazeera, ‘Russia, Turkey agree on borders of demilitarised zone in Idlib’, 22 September 2018 coverage, figures presented in this output may differ from official CCCM 1 Some figures reported may be repeated displacements. 5 Reuters, ‘Shelling kils eight in de-escalation zone around Syria’s Idlib’, 2 November 2018; Reuters, 2 CCCM/REACH, ISMI Monthly Displacement Summary, October 2018 ‘Shelling kills five in Idlib: Syrian Observatory’, 24 November 2018; The Guardian, ‘Syrian planes resume Cluster or UNHCR data. All data is for humanitarian use only. 3 IDP departure figures reflect aggregated departures of both IDP and resident/pre-conflict populations. airstrikes amid claims of gas attack in Aleppo’, 25 November 2018 Discrepancies between total reported arrivals and departures are possibly attributed to some departures 6 Daily Star, ‘25 fighters killed in clashes between pro-Turkey fighters in Afrin’, November 19 2018; The Coverage, November 2018 being repeated displacements, as well as some IDPs leaving to areas outside of ISMI coverage. Jerusalem Post, ‘‘25 killed’ as Turkey battle Syrian fighters accused of ‘plundering’’, November 19 2018 ! !!!!! !! !! !!! !!!!! ! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! !!! !!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! ! !!!! ! ! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!! !!!!! !! !! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! !!! !!!! ! ! ! !!!!!! !!!!!! !! !! ! Percentage of total IDP ! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!! ! ! !!!!! !!! ! !! ! IDP arrivals to sub-districts monitored by ISMI, November 2018 ! !!!!!!!!! ! !!! ! Administrative ! !!!!!! ! Al-Hasakeh ! !!!!! ! ! ! !!! !!! ! !!!!! ! ! !!!! !!!! arrivals by sub-district !! ! boundaries ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!! ! ! Aleppo Ü (1/11/18 - 30/11/18) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! !! ! !!! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! !! !! Ar-Raqqa ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! !!! ! !! ! ! !!!!!! !!!! !!!!!!! ! ! !! !!!!!!!! ! ! !!!! !!! !! ! !!! ! 0.1% - 1.0% !! ! ! !! !! ! Governorate ! ! ! ! ! Idle! b! ! ! !!! !! Bulbul Jarablus !!!!!!! !! !!!! !! !!!! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! Raju (1,551) 1.1% - 5.0% ! !! ! (527) Ghandorah 428 Lattakia !! ! Sharan ! ! !! Deir-ez-Zor TTUURRKKEEYY(482) (801) IDPs 5.1% - 9.0% (500) Suran - Sub-district Hama Mabtali Azaz Aleppo Sheikh (261) 9.1% - 21.7% El-Hadid (509) (34) Aghtrin Tartous (455) (146) Menbij Most common sub-districts Major displacements Afrin Mare Jandairis (904) (17) Al Bab of departure ( >420 IDP ( >400 IDPs ) Homs Qourqeena (1,119) (1,318) arrivals from sub-district) 401 (423) IDPs Outward External Harim Salqin Dana Daret Azza Armanaz (103) displacement (17) (91) (309) Jebel (138) Saman Inward & outward Damascus Rural Damascus (286) Internal Janudiyeh 474 displacement (40) Maaret IDPs Quneitra Tamsrin Jisr-Ash-Shugur Teftnaz Dar'a IDLEB (781) Zarbah As-Sweida (485) Darkosh (57) (206) Badama Idleb (29) Sarmin (148) (251) ALEPPO (285) 1,039 Saraqab 617 ! IDPs Ariha Sub-districts monitored by ISMI Sub-districts not monitored Assessed communities Mhambal (2,047) (2,236) IDPs Abul Thohur (149) Ehsem Maarrat (114) (290) 4,332 AR-RAQQA Ziyara 1,084 An Numan IDPs IDPs (91) (5,439) LATTAKIA Kafr Nobol 457 CCCM CLUSTER Heish IDPs Sanjar (1,815) (228) Madiq 450 Khan Tamanaah Castle IDPs (148) Shaykun Feedback: CCCM Cluster Northern Syria (211) Email: [email protected] Kafr Zeita Km HAMA 0 25 50 100 Info: www.globalcccmcluster.org, www.humanitarianresponse.info 1 IDP Situation Monitoring Initiative (ISMI) CCCM CLUSTER Monthly Overview of IDP Movements in north-west Syria, November 2018 IDLEB & SURROUNDING AREAS7 9 IDP arrivals to assessed communities in Idleb and surrounding areas Total IDP arrivals ( 1/11/18 - 30/11/18 ) IDP Departures Key Figures (! (! 11 - 100 (! 201 - 600 In parallel, the total number of IDP departures (! 101 - 200 (! 601 - 1397 Communities assessed: 222 ² (! ! (35,783) reported from assessed communities in (! (! ( (! (! (! (! Major IDP arrivals (>420 IDPs) the region between 1 and 30 November increased (!(!(! (! 12 Total IDP arrivals: 16,417 (49%) (!(! (! by 51% compared to October. More than a third ! ( (! (! * Major departure communities (38%) of these were primary displacements, Sub-districts with most arrivals (# IDPs): (! 100+41+38+33+14 (! IDLEB (! in contrast to just 2% of the previous month’s total (! (! Ma’arrat An Nu’man 5,439 (! (! reported departures. All primary displacements (! Saraqab 2,236 (! ! ALEPPO reported in November were from just 15 assessed ( (! ! (! Ariha 2,047 ! ( ( (! (! (! communities, in Al Ma’ra and Idleb districts. Kafr Nobol 1,815 (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! ! Top intended destination sub-districts (# IDPs): Maaret Tamsrin 781 ( (! 100+43+43+37+36 ! (! (! (! (! ( (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! (! ! (! (! (! (! Ma’arrat An Nu’man 5,499 (! ( ! (! (! (! (! ( (! (! (! (! Total IDP departures: 35,783 ( 51%) (! Afrin 2,379 (! Banin Ghadqa (! (! (! (! (!" (! (! (! Badama 2,373 Sub-districts with most departures (# IDPs): (! (! (!" 100+32+24+19+12 ! LATTAKIA Telamnas ((! Abu Makki Dana 2,018 (! (!" Ma’arrat An Nu’man 14,593 ! " (! ( (! !" " Madiq Castle 2,002 (! (! (! (! ( (!Sarman* Dana 4,619 (! !(! ((! (! 5 Heish 3,467 (! (! (! Jarjnaz* Following aerial bombardments on Jarjnaz, a Badama 2,797 (! (! total of 3,568 IDPs and 8,539 residents reportedly Tamanaah 1,784 (! (! left the community, accounting for 27% of all departures tracked in north-west Syria over the reporting period. Substantial departures were also Kms Kafr Zeita* HAMA Overview 0 25 50 reported from elsewhere in Ma’arrat An Nu’man Following a sharp decrease in the total number 11 sub-district, namely Sarman (1,140) and Maasaran Most common push factors of IDP arrivals: (855) communities. Furthermore, Tah community of displacements reported in the region from IDP Arrivals 1st 2nd 3rd September to October, several areas of opposition- More than two thirds (70%) of the 16,417 IDP in Heish sub-district witnessed significant IDP Escalation of ground-based conflict 43 4 4 departures (2,583), following similar intensifications held Idleb, western Aleppo and northern arrivals in the region reported in November were Loss of income 18 16 15 to assessed locations in Ma’arrat An Nu’man of violence. Hama governorates witnessed renewed large Anticipation of future conflict escalation 6 31 4 displacements throughout November. Notably, (5,439), Saraqab (2,236), Ariha (2,047) and Kafr Additionally, large-scale secondary displacements substantial IDP departure waves
Recommended publications
  • SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020

    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020

    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; in- cident data: ACLED, 20 June 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 23 JUNE 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 3058 397 1256 violence Development of conflict incidents from December 2017 to December 2019 2 Battles 1023 414 2211 Strategic developments 528 6 10 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 327 210 305 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 169 1 9 Riots 8 1 1 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 5113 1029 3792 Disclaimer 8 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 20 June 2020). Development of conflict incidents from December 2017 to December 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 20 June 2020). 2 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 23 JUNE 2020 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
  • Weekly Conflict Summary | 1 - 8 September 2019

    Weekly Conflict Summary | 1 - 8 September 2019

    WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 1 - 8 SEPTEMBER 2019 WHOLE OF SYRIA SUMMARY • NORTHWEST | Government of Syria (GoS) momentum slowed in Idleb this week, with no advances recorded. Further civilian protests denouncing Hayyat Tahrir ash Sham (HTS) took place in the northwest, in addition to pro-HTS and pro-Hurras al Din demonstrations. HTS and Jaish al Izza also launched a recruitment drive in the northwest. • SOUTH & CENTRAL | Attacks against GoS-aligned personnel and former opposition members continued in southern Syria, including two unusual attacks claimed by ISIS. GoS forces evicted civilians and appropriated several hundred houses in Eastern Ghouta. • NORTHEAST | The first joint US/Turkish ground patrol took place in Tal Abiad this week as part of an ongoing implementation of the “safe zone” in northern Syria. Low-level attacks against the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and SDF arrest operations of alleged ISIS members continued. Two airstrikes targeting Hezbollah and Iranian troops occurred in Abu Kamal. Figure 1: Dominant Actors’ Area of Control and Influence in Syria as of 8 September 2019. NSOAG stands for Non-state Organized Armed Groups. For more explanation on our mapping, please see the footnote on page 2. Page 1 of 5 WEEKLY CONFLICT SUMMARY | 1 - 8 SEPTEMBER 2019 NORTHWEST SYRIA1 GoS momentum in southern Idleb Governorate slowed this week, with no advances recorded. This comes a week after Damascus announced a ceasefire for the northwest on 31 August that saw a significant reduction in aerial activity, with no events recorded in September so far. However, GoS shelling continued impacting the Hayyat Tahrir ash Sham (HTS)-dominated enclave, with at least 26 communities2 affected (Figure 2).
  • Field Developments in Idleb 51019

    Field Developments in Idleb 51019

    Field Developments in Idleb, Northern Hama Countryside, Western Situation Report and Southern Aleppo Countryside During March and April 2019 May 2019 Aleppo Countrysides During March and April 2019 the Information Management Unit 1 Field Developments in Idleb, Northern Hama Countryside, Western and Southern Aleppo Countryside During March and April 2019 The Assistance Coordination Unit (ACU) aims to strengthen the decision-making capacity of aid actors responding to the Syrian crisis. This is done through collecting, analyzing and sharing information on the humanitarian situation in Syria. To this end, the Assistance Coordination Unit through the Information Management Unit established a wide net- work of enumerators who have been recruited depending on specific criteria such as education level, association with information sources and ability to work and communicate under various conditions. IMU collects data that is difficult to reach by other active international aid actors, and pub- lishes different types of information products such as Need Assessments, Thematic Reports, Maps, Flash Reports, and Interactive Reports. 2 Field Developments in Idleb, Northern Hama Countryside, Western Situation Report and Southern Aleppo Countryside During March and April 2019 May 2019 During March and April 2019 3 Field Developments in Idleb, Northern Hama Countryside, Western and Southern Aleppo Countryside During March and April 2019 01. The Most Prominent Shelling Operations During March and April 2019, the Syrian regime and its Russian ally shelled Idleb Governorate and its adjacent countrysides of Aleppo and Hama governorates, with hundreds of air strikes, and artillery and missile shells. The regime bombed 14 medical points, including hospitals and dispensaries; five schools, including a kinder- garten; four camps for IDPs; three bakeries and two centers for civil defense, in addition to more than a dozen of shells that targeted the Civil Defense volunteers during the evacuation of the injured and the victims.
  • SYRIA, YEAR 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021

    SYRIA, YEAR 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021

    SYRIA, YEAR 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, 6 May 2018a; administrative divisions: GADM, 6 May 2018b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 12 March 2021; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, YEAR 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 6187 930 2751 violence Development of conflict incidents from 2017 to 2020 2 Battles 2465 1111 4206 Strategic developments 1517 2 2 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 1389 760 997 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 449 2 4 Riots 55 4 15 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 12062 2809 7975 Disclaimer 9 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). Development of conflict incidents from 2017 to 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). 2 SYRIA, YEAR 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
  • Summry Report of Maarat Al-Numan

    Summry Report of Maarat Al-Numan

    Cover Image: VDC SY Introduction Many villages and regions in Idlib governorate were subjected to hundreds of unlawful airstrikes that resulted in many horrific massacres against civilians. According to figures from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, these massacres left dozens of dead and hundreds of wounded and were a direct cause of the displacement of at least 235.000 people, including at least 140.000 children, from southern Idlib Since 12 December. Moreover, these airstrikes have affected thousands of homes, most of which have been almost completely destroyed. The airstrikes launched by the Syrian Air Force and Russian war fighters were intensified especially in the middle of December 2019 and during the days that followed, dozens of densely populated residential neighborhoods were targeted, systematic and regular attacks were recorded that clearly and unambiguously targeted civil- ian neighborhoods, killing hundreds of civilians and causing huge losses of property to the residents, especially in terms of destroying homes, shops and commercial facilities. 2 Summary The Violations Documentation Center in Syria (VDC) warns of the catastrophic consequences of the military escalation of Syrian government forces and Russian forces in the Maarat al-Numan area, foremost among them is the pushing of thousands of civilians to forced displacement from the region, as the attacks by the Syrian government and Russian forces are using warplanes, heli- copters and surface-to-surface missiles targeting civilian objects, markets, infrastructure, as well as advances on the ground are forcing civilians to be forced displaced from their homes, which will deepen the humanitarian crisis in Idlib governorate.
  • Violations of the De-Escalation Zones Agreement in Idlib Province

    Violations of the De-Escalation Zones Agreement in Idlib Province

    Violations of the De-escalation Zones Agreement in Idlib Province March 30, 2019 The Government of Syria (GoS) has started to blatantly violate the De-Escalation Zone agreement for Idlib province. The area is one of four de-escalation zones established as a result of the De-Escalation Zones Agreement reached between Russia, Turkey and Iran in Astana. This report attempts to shed light on the most significant violations committed by the GoS in the northwest of Syria: in Idlib province, the northern countryside of Hama province and the western countryside of Aleppo province. Idlib The region that includes Idlib province and its surrounding areas is the last major stronghold of the Syrian opposition. The province is one of the main destinations for all Syrian IDPs who have been forcibly displaced from other Syrian regions, as part of the so-called “reconciliation” or ceasefire agreements reached between the GoS and the opposition armed groups. According to the latest statistics of the Assistance Coordination Unit (ACU), the region includes an estimated 3.5 million people, of which one million are IDPs. Field developments and violation of the de-escalation zones agreement in Idlib province By the end of 2018, the GoS had strengthened its military presence on the outskirts of Idlib province. It had shelled villages in Idlib’s southern countryside and in Hama’s northern countryside, in violation of the de-escalation zones agreement. Since the beginning of 2019, roughly 370 violations have been documented, according field observers in the province. Since the beginning of February 2019, the GoS has expanded its military attacks to more than 40 points including the towns of Khan Sheikhun, Maarrat al-Nu'man, Saraqib, al- Tih and Jarjnaz.
  • SYRIA - IDLEB Humanitarian Purposes Only IDP Location - As of 23 Oct 2015 Production Date : 26 Oct 2015

    SYRIA - IDLEB Humanitarian Purposes Only IDP Location - As of 23 Oct 2015 Production Date : 26 Oct 2015

    SYRIA - IDLEB Humanitarian Purposes Only IDP Location - As of 23 Oct 2015 Production date : 26 Oct 2015 Nabul Al Bab MARE' JANDAIRIS AFRIN NABUL Tadaf AL BAB Atma ! Qah ² ! Daret Haritan Azza TADAF Reyhanli DARET AZZA HARITAN DANA Deir Hassan RASM HARAM !- Darhashan Harim Jebel EL-IMAM Tlul Dana ! QOURQEENA Saman Antakya Ein Kafr Hum Elbikara Big Hir ! ! Kafr Mu Jamus ! Ta l ! HARIM Elkaramej Sahara JEBEL SAMAN Besnaya - Sarmada ! ! Bseineh Kafr ! Eastern SALQIN ! Qalb Ariba Deryan Kafr ! Htan ! Lozeh ! Kafr Naha Kwaires ! Barisha Maaret ! ! Karmin TURKEY Allani ! Atarib ! Kafr Rabeeta ! Radwa ! Eskat ! ! Kila ! Qourqeena Kafr Naseh Atareb Elatareb Salqin Kafr ! EASTERN KWAIRES Delbiya Meraf ! Kafr Elshalaf Takharim Mars ! Kafr ! Jeineh Aruq ! Ta lt i t a ! Hamziyeh ! Kelly ! Abu ! Ta lh a ATAREB ! Kaftin Qarras KAFR TAKHARIMHelleh ! Abin ! Kafr ! Hazano ! Samaan Hind ! Kafr ! Kuku - Thoran Ein Eljaj ! As Safira Armanaz ! Haranbush ! Maaret Saidiyeh Kafr Zarbah ! Elekhwan Kafr - Kafr ! Aleppo Kafrehmul ! Azmarin Nabi ! Qanater Te ll e m ar ! ! ! ! Dweila Zardana AS-SAFIRA ! Mashehad Maaret Elnaasan ! Biret MAARET TAMSRIN - Maaret Ramadiyeh Elhaski Ghazala -! Armanaz ! ! Mgheidleh Maaret ! ARMANAZKuwaro - Shallakh Hafasraja ! Um Elriyah ! ! Tamsrin TEFTNAZ ! Zanbaqi ! Batenta ! ALEPPO Milis ! Kafraya Zahraa - Maar Dorriyeh Kherbet ! Ta m sa ri n Teftnaz Hadher Amud ! ! Darkosh Kabta Quneitra Kafr Jamiliya ! ! ! Jales Andnaniyeh Baliya Sheikh ! BENNSH Banan ! HADHER - Farjein Amud Thahr Yousef ! ! ! ! Ta lh i ye h ZARBAH Nasra DARKOSH Arshani
  • Syria - Displacements from Northern Syria Production Date : 25/08/2016 IDP Locations - As of 16 August 2016

    Syria - Displacements from Northern Syria Production Date : 25/08/2016 IDP Locations - As of 16 August 2016

    For Humanitarian Purposes Only Syria - Displacements from Northern Syria Production date : 25/08/2016 IDP Locations - As of 16 August 2016 Total number of IDPs: 749,275 BULBUL Raju " RAJU Shamarin Talil Elsham ² Krum Zayzafun - Ekdeh Gender & Age SHARAN Shmarekh Sharan Kafrshush Baraghideh " Tatiyeh Jdideh Maarin Ar-Ra'ee Salama AR-RA'EE " Nayara Ferziyeh A'ZAZ Azaz " Azaz Niddeh 19% MA'BTALI Sijraz Yahmul Maabatli Suran " Jarez " Kafr Kalbein 31% Maraanaz Girls under 18 Al-Malikeyyeh Kaljibrin AGHTRIN Afrin Manaq Akhtrein Boys under 18 " " Sheikh El-Hadid " Mare' Women " A'RIMA Tall Refaat 24% " Men Baselhaya TALL REFAAT AFRIN Deir Jmal MARE' Kafr Naseh Tal Refaat 26% Kafrnaya JANDAIRIS Jandairis " Nabul AL BAB " Al Bab " NABUL Tal Jbine Tadaf " Shelter Type Hayyan T U R K E Y Qah Atma Selwa Random gatherings HARITAN Andan Haritan TADAF Unfinished houses or Daret Azza " " buildings Reyhanli Kafr Bssin Other Qabtan Eljabal Tilaada Individual tents DARET AZZA A L E P P O Babis Deir Hassan - Darhashan Hur Maaret Elartiq Kafr Hamra Rented houses DANA Hezreh - Hezri Termanin Dana Anjara Foziyeh Harim " Bshantara RASM HARAM EL-IMAM Open areas " Tqad Majbineh Aleppo Antakya Ras Elhisn " Total Tlul Kafr Hum Ein Elbikara Aleppo HARIM Tuwama Hoteh Under trees Kafr Mu Tlul Big Hir Jamus QOURQEENA Tal Elkaramej Sahara JEBEL SAMAN Um Elamad Alsafira Besnaya - Bseineh Sarmada Oweijel Htan Tadil Collective center Ariba Qalb Lozeh Barisha Eastern Kwaires " Bozanti Kafr Deryan Kafr Karmin Abzemo Maaret Atarib Allani Radwa Kafr Taal Kafr Naha Home Kafr
  • SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021

    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021

    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, 6 May 2018a; administrative divisions: GADM, 6 May 2018b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 12 March 2021; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 1539 195 615 violence Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 2 Battles 650 308 1174 Violence against civilians 394 185 218 Methodology 3 Strategic developments 364 1 1 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 158 0 0 Riots 9 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 3114 689 2008 Disclaimer 7 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). 2 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
  • SITUATION REPORT Hawala Registration in Idleb Governorate

    SITUATION REPORT Hawala Registration in Idleb Governorate

    HUMANITARIAN ACCESS TEAM (HAT) SITUATION REPORT Hawala Registration in Idleb Governorate JUNE 15, 2017 Executive Summary Since mid-May 2017, Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham has taken several noteworthy steps toward regulating the hawala sector in northwestern Syria. These actions could pose a significant challenge to international and local humanitarian organizations implementing projects in northwestern Syria due to potential donor-compliance issues related to Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham. This report provides a brief overview of the hawala market in northwestern Syria, a summary of the steps that Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham has recently taken to establish control over this sector, an analysis of the goals of Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham recent actions, and an assessment of the immediate impact with respect to the hawala market. On May 9, Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham attempted to formally regulate the hawala industry in Idleb by establishing a new governing body, the General Institution for Cash Management and Customer Protection, and demanding that hawalas in northwest Syria register and pay associated fees. Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham’s attempt was initially unsuccessful; few hawala agents in northwestern Syria accepted Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham’s new regulations. Subsequently, Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham waived all fees, and as a compromise, hawala agents in Idleb governorate registered with Hay’at Tahrir Al- Sham. This regulatory initiative occurred shortly after multiple large-scale fluctuations in the USD-SYP exchange rate, the consequence of a substantial cash infusion into opposition-controlled Idleb in mid-April as a part of the Foah and Kefraya evacuation negotiations.
  • SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021

    SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021

    SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, 6 May 2018a; administrative divisions: GADM, 6 May 2018b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 12 March 2021; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 1439 241 633 violence Development of conflict incidents from September 2018 to September Battles 543 232 747 2020 2 Violence against civilians 400 209 262 Strategic developments 394 0 0 Methodology 3 Protests 107 0 0 Conflict incidents per province 4 Riots 12 1 2 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 2895 683 1644 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). Disclaimer 7 Development of conflict incidents from September 2018 to September 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). 2 SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
  • Education and Conflict Review 2020

    Education and Conflict Review 2020

    EDUCATION AND CONFLICT REVIEW 2020 Education and Conflict Review Rebuilding Syrian higher education for a stable future Editor Tejendra Pherali Issue 3 Guest editor Juliet Millican July 2020 Centre for Education and International Development University College London, United Kingdom 1 EDUCATION AND CONFLICT REVIEW 2020 Cover image: College of Arts, Raqqa, Syria © Hassan Almohammed Image page 8: Main entrance of the College of Pharmacy, Raqqa, Syria © Hassan Almohammed Image page 37: College of Science, Raqqa, Syria © Hassan Almohammed Images page 52: Free Aleppo University in the Liberated Areas, Northern Syria Education and Conflict Review Rebuilding Syrian higher education for a stable future Editor Tejendra Pherali Guest editor Juliet Millican 1 EDUCATION AND CONFLICT REVIEW 2020 About Education and Conflict Review Education and Conflict Review is an open-source journal published by the Centre for Education and International Development, University College London. It focuses on debates about broad issues relating to education, conflict and international development and aims to provide succinct analyses of social, political, economic and security dimensions in conflict-affected and humanitarian situations. It provides a forum for knowledge exchange to build synergies between academics, practitioners and graduate students who are researching and working in these environments. CENTRE FOR EDUCATION AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Centre for Education and International Development (CEID) Department of Education, Practice and Society UCL Institute of Education University College London 20 Bedford Way London WC1H 0AL Email: [email protected] a lifeline to academics at risk The publication of this special issue was supported by Cara (the Council for At-Risk Academics). Cara was set up in 1933 by academics and scientists in the UK.