Dr. Rick Barnes, Voice of America
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice Oversight of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate One Hundred Sixth Congress First Session
S. HRG. 106-673 OVERSIGHT OF FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE: ITS ROLE IN FIGHTING CRIME HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE OVERSIGHT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE, FOCUSING ON ITS ROLE IN FIGHTING CRIME AND THE NEED FOR REFORM OF THE ASSET FORFEITURE LAWS JULY 21, 1999 Serial No. J-106-38 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary Department of Justice NOV30 2000 MAIN LIBRARY U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 66-959 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Chairman STROM THURMOND, South Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JON KYL, Arizona HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin MIKE DEWINE, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York BOB SMITH, New Hampshire MANUS COONEY, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Minority Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE OVERSIGHT STROM THURMOND, South Carolina, Chairman MIKE DEWINE, Ohio CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont GARRY MALPHRUS, Chief Counsel GLEN SHOR, Legislative Assistant (II) CONTENTS STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE MEMBER Page Thurmond, Hon. Strom, U.S. Senator from the State of South Carolina 1 DeWine, Hon. Mike, U.S. Senator from the State of Ohio 3 Schumer, Hon. -
Juliana Geran Pilon Education
JULIANA GERAN PILON [email protected] Dr. Juliana Geran Pilon is Research Professor of Politics and Culture and Earhart Fellow at the Institute of World Politics. For the previous two years, she taught in the Political Science Department at St. Mary’s College of Maryland. From January 1991 to October 2002, she was first Director of Programs, Vice President for Programs, and finally Senior Advisor for Civil Society at the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES), after three years at the National Forum Foundation, a non-profit institution that focused on foreign policy issues - now part of Freedom House - where she was first Executive Director and then Vice President. At NFF, she assisted in creating a network of several hundred young political activists in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. For the past thirteen years she has also taught at Johns Hopkins University, the Institute of World Politics, George Washington University, and the Institute of World Politics. From 1981 to 1988, she was a Senior Policy Analyst at the Heritage Foundation, writing on the United Nations, Soviet active measures, terrorism, East-West trade, and other international issues. In 1991, she received an Earhart Foundation fellowship for her second book, The Bloody Flag: Post-Communist Nationalism in Eastern Europe -- Spotlight on Romania, published by Transaction, Rutgers University Press. Her autobiographical book Notes From the Other Side of Night was published by Regnery/Gateway, Inc. in 1979, and translated into Romanian in 1993, where it was published by Editura de Vest. A paperback edition appeared in the U.S. in May 1994, published by the University Press of America. -
Transcript Prepared from a Tape Recording.]
1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION A Brookings Judicial Issues Forum PRESIDENTIAL WAR POWERS: HAS THE GOVERNMENT GONE TOO FAR? STUART TAYLOR - Moderator Non-resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution Friday, March 17, 2006 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Falk Auditorium 1776 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. [TRANSCRIPT PREPARED FROM A TAPE RECORDING.] MILLER REPORTING CO., INC. 735 8th STREET, S.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20003-2802 (202) 546-6666 2 C O N T E N T S SPEAKER PAGE Lou Fisher Specialist in the Law Library, Library of Congress 7 Roger Pilon Vice president for Legal Affairs, Cato Institute 15 William Galston Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution 26 Andrew McBride Partner, Wiley, Rein & Fielding 35 Discussion Q&A 44 MILLER REPORTING CO., INC. 735 8th STREET, S.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20003-2802 (202) 546-6666 3 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. STUART TAYLOR: [in progress] terrorism, which is already longer than the civil war or World War II, has no end in site. Just two weeks after 9/11, a Justice Department official named John Yew penned a memo that could be called the Bush Doctrine on War Powers. He wrote this. "Congress may not place any limits on the president's determinations as to any terrorist threat, the amount of military force to be used in response, or the method, timing and nature of the response. These decisions, under our Constitution, are for the president alone to make." Since then, the administration lawyers have argued that the president has the following powers: He could launch a major preemptive invasion without congressional approval, although ultimately he did obtain congressional approval in the case of Iraq. -
WY Theater 2019 8 Dec (3) (1).Pdf
World Youth Theater World Youth Theatre’19 This year our show will run for 3 days; • Theatre Opening- Day 1: 13th of December from 7:00-9:00 pm. • Day 2: 15th of December from 8:00-10:00 pm. • Theatre Closing- Day 3: 16th of December from 8:00-10:00 pm. Mervat Abou Oaf She is a professor of practice and prior chair (2011-2014) of the Journalism and Mass Communication Department (JRMC) at the School of Global Affairs and Public Policy (GAPP) at The American University in Cairo (AUC). She received her PhD doctoral degree from the University Autonoma of Barcelona (UAB), Spain with “Excellent” qualification, in the legislative, regulatory concentration on the Egyptian film industry. She is one of the singers of the Egyptian band 4M, founded by the artist Ezzat Abu Auf with his sisters Mona, Maha, Manal Abu Auf Basem Darwisch The Composer and Oud player Bassem Darwish, the founder of Egyptian-German ensemble Cairo Steps, will be the guest of honor for the WYT 2019. • He is nicknamed 'Egyptian Ambassador to Germany', and received the German Golden Jazz Award with his Cairo Steps for his 2018 album 'The Flying Carpet'. • Famous for his own style, including jazz , Arabic Nubian melodies and traditional rhythms with improvisation, Bassem is one of the most acclaimed Egyptian music experts in Europe with his long experience as a soloist of Oud. He worked in television, film and drama as a producer and music consultant. Rula Zaki Singer Egyptian singer performing the opening song. Rula Zaki is a renowned singer from Cairo, Egypt. -
The Constitutional Protection of Property Rights: America and Europe
The Constitutional Protection of Property Rights: America and Europe by Roger Pilon, Ph.D., J.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………. 1 II. THE AMERICAN THEORY OF LEGITIMACY…………………………... 3 A. Natural Rights and the Limits of Political Consent……………………..... 3 B. Individual Liberty, Limited Government………………………………… 4 C. Political and Legal Legitimacy…………………………………………... 6 III. PROPERTY IN THE STATE OF NATURE………………………………… 7 A. Human Rights as Property Rights………………………………………... 7 B. Original Acquisition……………………………………………………… 8 C. Positive Law.…………………………………………….….……………. 10 D. Rights of Use..…………………………………………….……………… 12 E. Nuisance and Endangerment……………………………………………... 14 F. Rights, Values, and the Pursuit of Happiness……………………………. 15 IV. FROM NATURAL TO CONSTITUTIONAL LAW………………………... 16 A. Public Goods and “Public” Pursuits……………………………………… 16 B. A Constitution for Liberty………………………………………………... 18 C. The Constitution and Property Rights……………………………………. 20 D. From Limited Government to Leviathan………………………………… 22 i E. Judicial “Activism” and “Restraint”……………………………………... 25 V. THE SUPREME COURT’S TREATMENT OF PROPERTY RIGHTS……. 27 A. Government Actions Affecting Property: In Summary………………….. 28 B. The Court Stumbles Through the Cases………………………………….. 33 1. Regulatory Takings…………………………………….……………... 33 a. Physical Invasion Cases…..…………………………………… 33 b. Diminution-of-Value Cases…...………………………..……… 35 c. Regulatory Exaction Cases…………………….…………….… 52 d. Temporary Takings………………………………..…………… 55 2. Eminent Domain…………………………………………………….... 58 a. Blight -
Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986
Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Steven T. Wills June 2012 © 2012 Steven T. Wills. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwtaer Nichols Act of 1986 by STEVEN T. WILLS has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Ingo Traushweizer Assistant Professor of History Howard Dewald Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT WILLS, STEVEN T., M.A., June 2012, History Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 Director of Thesis: Ingo Traushweizer The Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 was the most comprehensive defense reorganization legislation in a generation. It has governed the way the United States has organized, planned, and conducted military operations for the last twenty five years. It passed the Senate and House of Representatives with margins of victory reserved for birthday and holiday resolutions. It is praised throughout the U.S. defense establishment as a universal good. Despite this, it engendered a strong opposition movement organized primarily by Navy Secretary John F. Lehman but also included members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, prominent Senators and Congressman, and President Reagan's Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger. This essay will examine the forty year background of defense reform movements leading to the Goldwater Nichols Act, the fight from 1982 to 1986 by supporters and opponents of the proposed legislation and its twenty-five year legacy that may not be as positive as the claims made by the Department of Defense suggest. -
HOW CONSTITUTIONAL CORRUPTION HAS LED to IDEOLOGICAL LITMUS TESTS for JUDICIAL Nomineest
HOW CONSTITUTIONAL CORRUPTION HAS LED TO IDEOLOGICAL LITMUS TESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOMINEESt Roger Pilon* I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2000 presidential election was widely understood to be a battle for the courts. When George W. Bush finally won, following the Supreme Court's split decision in Bush v. Gore, many Democratic activists simply dug in their heels, vowing to frustrate Bush's efforts to fill vacancies on the federal courts. After Democrats took control of the Senate in May of 2001, they began calling explicitly for ideological litmus tests for judicial nominees. And they started a confirmation stall, especially for circuit court nominees, that continues to this day. Thus, eight of Bush's first 11 circuit court nominees went for over a year without even a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and most have still not come before the committee.' As the backlog of nominees grows, Democrats are quite explicit about the politics of the matter: their aim is to keep "highly credentialed, conservative ideologues" from the bench.2 The rationales they offer contend that judges today are, and perhaps should be, "setting national policy." 3 One such "policy" they abhor is "[t]he Supreme Court's recent 5- 4 decisions that constrain Congressional power."4 Thus the importance, they say, of placing "sympathetic judges" on the bench, judges who share "the core values held by most of our country's citizens."5 Their view, in a word, is that everything is politics, nothing is law. t This article is the first publication of a revised version of ROGER PILON, CATO INSTITUTE, PoLICY ANALYSIS No. -
A Modest Proposal on Must-Carry, the 1992 Cable Act, and Regulation Generally: Go Back to Basics Roger Pilon
Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 17 | Number 1 Article 3 1-1-1994 A Modest Proposal on Must-Carry, the 1992 Cable Act, and Regulation Generally: Go Back to Basics Roger Pilon Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_comm_ent_law_journal Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Roger Pilon, A Modest Proposal on Must-Carry, the 1992 Cable Act, and Regulation Generally: Go Back to Basics, 17 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 41 (1994). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol17/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Modest Proposal on "Must-Carry," the 1992 Cable Act, and Regulation Generally: Go Back to Basicst by ROGER PILON* Table of Contents I. The 1992 Cable A ct ..................................... II. Must-Carry and the Court .............................. III. Must-Carry and the Constitution ....................... A. The Original Design ................................ B. The Commerce Clause Under the Original Design. C. Judicial Methodology Under the Original Design... D. Must-Carry Under the Original Design ............. IV. Must-Carry and Modern "Scrutiny Theory" . ........... t An earlier version of this Article was presented on February 25, 1994, at a symposium entitled The 1992 Cable Act: Freedom of Expression Issues, sponsored by and held at the Columbia Institute for Tele-Information (CITI), Columbia Business School, Columbia University. -
The 2020S Tri-Service Modernization Crunch Mackenzie Eaglen with Hallie Coyne MARCH 2021
Embargoed until Tuesday, March 23, at 12:01 a.m. EST The 2020s Tri-Service Modernization Crunch Mackenzie Eaglen with Hallie Coyne MARCH 2021 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE The 2020s Tri-Service Modernization Crunch Mackenzie Eaglen with Hallie Coyne MARCH 2021 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE © 2021 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. All rights reserved. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501(c)(3) educational organization and does not take institutional positions on any issues. The views expressed here are those of the author(s). Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 Addressing the Tri-Service Spending Spike ...................................................................... 3 Why Does It Matter? ..................................................................................................... 4 What Factors Are Making the Modernization Spending Crunch Worse? ............................... 6 What Does Addressing the Modernization Crunch Mean for the US Military in the 2020s? .............................................................................................................. 15 What Went Wrong: Identifying the Causes of the 2020s Modernization Crunch ................... 16 The Shape and Size of the Tri-Service Modernization Crunch ........................................... -
Rana, Pranaya. 2015. City of Dreams
BOOK REVIEWS | 427 on development intervention in which people and communities are the mere subjects of large scale development interventions. Fujikura tries to reverse this thinking by showing how people actively build and revise discourses of development, empowerment, participation and rights based on their choices and needs, like in the kamaiyà liberation movement, by using the approaches and methods popular in development practices. Secondly, Fujikura offers very interesting insights to the understanding of the Maoist movement and the kamaiyà liberation movement with detailed ethnographic observation. One would wish that Fujikaru had discussed at some more length the role (and place) of the anthropologist in fieldwork setting where s/he actively shares the concerns and aspirations of the people under study. His active involvement in and support to the kamaiyà liberation movement as a fieldworker should have been augmented by his own reflections on the anthropologist’s place in the multilayered ethnographic context. This would have provided some additional flavor to the overall insights of the book. The expressions of the respondents, which Fujikura presents to make his case on some key aspects of development, awareness and social movements would have needed more intensive examination. It is not unusual that respondents often have readymade answers on certain aspects of their agency which may not necessarily reflect the social realities which they live and interact with. The expressions, for example, of Comrade Jamuna, Parvati Adhikari, Yagyaraj Chaudhari, Dar Bahadur and Indra Bahadur need to be examined against the complex social and economic realities of their everyday lives. People often have multiple statements to fit multiple contexts. -
Voices from the Ground from Covid-19 to Radical Transformation of Our Food Systems
VOICES FROM THE GROUND: from COVID-19 to radical transformation of our food systems 2020 VOICES FROM THE GROUND FROM COVID-19 TO RADICAL TRANSFORMATION OF OUR FOOD SYSTEMS 1 VOICES FROM THE GROUND: from COVID-19 to radical transformation of our food systems IMPRESSUM Working Group on Global Food Governance of the Civil Society and Indigenous Peoples’ Mechanism (CSM) for relations with the UN Committee on World Food Security (CFS). FAO Headquarters, Rome, Italy www.csm4cfs.org Coordination Thierry Kesteloot and Nora McKeon Facilitation team of the CSM Global Food Governance Working Group Drafting team This report has been produced by the CSM Working Group on Global food governance in cooperation with the CSM Women and Youth Working groups Lead authors and editors: Kirtana Chandrasekaran, Shalmali Guttal, Thierry Kesteloot, Andre Luzzi, Nora McKeon Other members: Aida Jamangulova, Joana Dias, Heather Elaydi, Judith Hitchman, Nadia Lambek, Sophia Murphy, Saul Vincente Vasquez, Veronica Villa, Shiney Varghese, Azra Sayeed, Nettie Wiebe, Julia Spanier, Teresa Maisano This report has particularly benefited from the report of the CSM Women’s Working Group drafted by Jessica Duncan and Priscilla Claeys and by the Youth Declaration drafted by the Youth Working Group Thanks to the support of the CSM Secretariat Collective contributions were provided by: CSM constituencies and sub-regions. Inputs were made by a number of organizations and networks including: Aardeboerconsument, ARWC, Biowatch, CFFACAPE, COODDEFFAGOLF, COPROFAM, ECVC, El Poder del Consumidor, FIAN, ETC Group, FOEI, IFOAM, Focus on the Global South, HIC, ICFS, IITC, IUF, LVC, Oxfam, PROPAC, Redsan-CPLP, Rikkolto, ROPPA, Schola Campesina, Terra Nuova, Solawi, Urgenci, WFFP Peer review by the Global Food Governance WG and the CSM Coordination Committee Translation into French: Audrey Mouysset and Gregor Seither Translation in Spanish: Rodrigo Gines Salguero and Antonio Morillo Castellanos Graphic Design: Luca Tommasini Cover: Sylvia Blanco Photographs: Antara Foto, Barcroft Media, M. -
Em: Improving US Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Targeting
NOVEMBER 2019 If You Can’t See ’em, You Can’t Shoot ’em: Improving US Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Targeting BY SETH CROPSEY AND BRYAN MCGRATH © 2019 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. Hudson Institute would like to thank General Atomics for their support of this research and publication, and is grateful for past contributions from Northrop Grumman Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. Hudson Institute 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Fourth Floor Washington, D.C. 20004 +1.202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Cover: The guided-missile destroyer USS Dewey (DDG 105) transits the Pacific Ocean. Dewey is underway in the U.S. 3rd Fleet area of operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Devin M. Langer) NOVEMBER 2019 If You Can’t See ’em, You Can’t Shoot ’em: Improving US Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Targeting BY SETH CROPSEY AND BRYAN MCGRATH AUTHOR Seth Cropsey Bryan McGrath Director, Center for American Seapower Bryan McGrath formerly served as deputy director of Hudson Institute’s Center for American Seapower.