DOCSLIB.ORG

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,005,720 B2 King Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,005,720 B2 King Et Al USO08005720B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,005,720 B2 King et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Aug. 23, 2011 (54) APPLYING SCANNED INFORMATION TO No. 11/097,089, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, and a IDENTIFY CONTENT continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/097.835, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,831,912, and a (75) Inventors: Martin T. King, Vashon Island, WA (Continued) (US); Dale L. Grover, Ann Arbor, MI (US); Clifford A. Kushler, Lynnwood, (51) Int. Cl. WA (US); James Q. Stafford-Fraser, G06Q 30/00 (2006.01) Cambridge (GB) (52) U.S. Cl. ............... 705/26.1: 705/26: 705/27; 707/3; r ar. 707/4; 707/5; 707/E17.008; 382/305: 715/205 (73) Assignee: Google Inc., Mountain View, CA (US) (58) Field of Classification Search .................... 705/26, 705/27, 26.1: 707/345 E17.008: 382/305 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this s s s is a-s 715/205 past llists2, yed under 35 See application file for complete search history. This patent is Subject to a terminal dis- (56) References Cited claimer. U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (21) Appl. No.: 11/208,461 3,899,687 A 8, 1975 Jones (Continued) (22) Filed: Aug. 18, 2005 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (65) Prior Publication Data EP O424803 5, 1991 US 2006/01 1990O A1 Jun. 8, 2006 (Continued) Related U.S. Application Data OTHER PUBLICATIONS (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 11/004,637, U.S. Appl. No. 10/676,881, Lee et al. filed on Dec. 3, 2004, now Pat. No. 7,707,039, and a continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/097.961, (Continued) filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now abandoned, and a continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/097.093, Primary Examiner —Yogesh C Garg filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now abandoned, and a (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — McDonnell Boehnen continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/098,038, Hulbert & Berghoff LLP filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,599,844, and a continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/098,014, (57) ABSTRACT filed on Apr. 1, 2005, and a continuation-in-part of Information corresponding to a sentence or less of text is application No. 1 1/097,103, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now scanned from a rendered document and converted to text. The Pat. No. 7,596.269, and a continuation-in-part of text is communicated to a search engine. Electronic content application No. 1 1/098,043, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now corresponding to the rendered document from which the text abandoned, and a continuation of application No. was scanned is identified from the search engine results. 11/097.981, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,606.741, and a continuation-in-part of application 22 Claims, 11 Drawing Sheets SPLAY 422 US 8,005,720 B2 Page 2 Related U.S. Application Data filed on Oct. 1, 2004, provisional application No. 60/617,122, filed on Oct. 7, 2004, provisional applica continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/098,016, tion No. 60/622,906, filed on Oct. 28, 2004, provisional filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,421,155, and a application No. 60/633,452, filed on Dec. 6, 2004, pro continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/097,828, visional application No. 60/633,678, filed on Dec. 6, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,742,953, and a 2004, provisional application No. 60/633,486, filed on continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/097.833, Dec. 6, 2004, provisional application No. 60/633,453, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, and a continuation-in-part of appli filed on Dec. 6, 2004, provisional application No. cation No. 1 1/097.836, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now aban 60/634,627, filed on Dec. 9, 2004, provisional applica doned, and a continuation of application No. 1 1/098, tion No. 60/634,739, filed on Dec. 9, 2004, provisional application No. 60/647,684, filed on Jan. 26, 2005, pro 042, filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,593,605, and visional application No. 60/648,746, filed on Jan. 31, a continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/096.704, 2005, provisional application No. 60/653,372, filed on filed on Apr. 1, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,599,580, and a Feb. 15, 2004, provisional application No. 60/653,663, continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/110,353, filed on Feb. 16, 2005, provisional application No. filed on Apr. 19, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,702,624, and a 60/653,669, filed on Feb. 16, 2005, provisional applica continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/131,945, tion No. 60/653,899, filed on Feb. 16, 2005, provisional filed on May 17, 2005, now Pat. No. 7,818,215, and a application No. 60/653,679, filed on Feb. 16, 2005, pro continuation-in-part of application No. 1 1/185.908, visional application No. 60/653,847, filed on Feb. 16, filed on Jul. 19, 2005, now abandoned. 2005, provisional application No. 60/654,379, filed on Feb. 17, 2005, provisional application No. 60/654,368, (60) Provisional application No. 60/602.956, filed on Aug. filed on Feb. 18, 2005, provisional application No. 18, 2004, provisional application No. 60/602,925, filed 60/654,326, filed on Feb. 18, 2005, provisional applica on Aug. 18, 2004, provisional application No. 60/602, tion No. 60/654,196, filed on Feb. 18, 2005, provisional 947, filed on Aug. 18, 2004, provisional application No. application No. 60/655.279, filed on Feb. 22, 2005, pro 60/602,897, filed on Aug. 18, 2004, provisional applica visional application No. 60/655.280, filed on Feb. 22, tion No. 60/602,896, filed on Aug. 18, 2004, provisional 2005, provisional application No. 60/655.987, filed on application No. 60/602,930, filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Feb. 22, 2005, provisional application No. 60/655,697, provisional application No. 60/602,898, filed on Aug. filed on Feb. 22, 2005, provisional application No. 18, 2004, provisional application No. 60/603,466, filed 60/655.281, filed on Feb. 22, 2005, provisional applica on Aug. 19, 2004, provisional application No. 60/603, tion No. 60/657,309, filed on Feb. 28, 2005. 082, filed on Aug. 19, 2004, provisional application No. 60/603,081, filed on Aug. 19, 2004, provisional applica (56) References Cited tion No. 60/603,498, filed on Aug. 20, 2004, provisional application No. 60/603,358, filed on Aug. 20, 2004, U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS provisional application No. 60/604,103, filed on Aug. 4,052,058 A 10, 1977 Hintz 23, 2004, provisional application No. 60/604,098, filed 4,526,078 A 7, 1985 Chadabe on Aug. 23, 2004, provisional application No. 60/604, 4,538,072 A 8, 1985 Immler et al. 100, filed on Aug. 23, 2004, provisional application No. 4,610,025 A 9, 1986 Blum et al. 4,636,848 A 1/1987 Yamamoto et al. 60/604,102, filed on Aug. 23, 2004, provisional applica 4,713,008 A 12/1987 Stocker et al. tion No. 60/605,229, filed on Aug. 27, 2004, provisional 4,716,804 A 1/1988 Chadabe application No. 60/605,105, filed on Aug. 27, 2004, 4,748,678 A 5/1988 Takeda et al. provisional application No. 60/613.243, filed on Sep. 4,776.464 A 10, 1988 Miller et al. 4,804,949 A 2f1989 Faulkerson 27, 2004, provisional application No. 60/613,628, filed 4,805,099 A 2, 1989 Huber on Sep. 27, 2004, provisional application No. 60/613, 4,829,453 A 5/1989 Katsuta et al. 632, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, provisional application No. 4,829,872 A 5/1989 Topic et al. 60/613,589, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, provisional applica 4,890,230 A 12, 1989 Tanoshima et al. tion No. 60/613.242, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, provisional D306, 162 S 2f1990 Faulkerson et al. 4,901,364 A 2f1990 Faulkerson et al. application No. 60/613,602, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, pro 4.914,709 A 4, 1990 Rudak visional application No. 60/613,340, filed on Sep. 27, 4.941,125 A 7/1990 Boyne 2004, provisional application No. 60/613,634, filed on 4.947,261 A 8, 1990 Ishikawa et al. Sep. 27, 2004, provisional application No. 60/613,461, 4,949,391 A 8, 1990 Faulkerson et al. filed on Sep. 27, 2004, provisional application No. 4,968,877 A 1 1/1990 McAvinney et al. 4,985,863. A 1/1991 Fujisawa et al. 60/613,455, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, provisional applica 4,988,981 A 1/1991 Zimmerman et al. tion No. 60/613,460, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, provisional 5,010,500 A 4, 1991 Makkuni et al. application No. 60/613,400, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, pro 5,012,349 A 4/1991 de Fayet al. visional application No. 60/613.456, filed on Sep. 27, 5,062,143 A 10, 1991 Schmitt 5,083,218 A 1/1992 Takasu et al. 2004, provisional application No. 60/613,341, filed on 5,093,873 A 3, 1992 Takahashi et al. Sep. 27, 2004, provisional application No. 60/613,361, 5,109,439 A 4, 1992 Froessl filed on Sep.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brief Industry Trends Report 2H 2008
    ISSN 1985 - 7535 Brief Industry Trends Report 2H 2008 Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (SKMM), 2009 The information or material in this publication is protected under copyright and save where otherwise stated, may be reproduced for non commercial use provided it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. Where any material is reproduced, SKMM as the source of the material must be identified and the copyright status acknowledged. The permission to reproduce does not extend to any information or material the copyright of which belongs to any other person, organisation or third party. Authorisation or permission to reproduce such information or material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned. This work is based on sources believed to be reliable, but SKMM does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of any information for any purpose and cannot accept responsibility for any error or omission. Published by: Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission Off Persiaran Multimedia 63000 Cyberjaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan Tel: +60 3 86 88 80 00 Fax: +60 3 86 88 10 06 Toll Free: 1- 800-888-030 http://www.skmm.gov.my CONTENTS FOREWORD 2 SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS 3 C&M MARKET CAPITALISATION AND PERFORMANCE Feeling the Effects of Global Financial Crisis 4 C&M Market Capitalisation Plummeted Significantly 6 Individual C&M Companies Contribution to Bursa Malaysia 7 C&M Companies Share Price Movements 7 C&M Amongst Other Heavyweights 8 Local C&M versus Overseas by Market Capitalisation in US Dollar 9 GOOGLE
    [Show full text]
  • Google Enterprise for Manufacturing: Become a Connected Manufacturer
    Google Enterprise for Manufacturing: Become a Connected Manufacturer By Doug Bartholomew Over the past two decades, manufac- productivity and email; mapping software turing enterprises have installed numerous for visualizing geographic business data; a types of systems to help run their businesses. cloud-based infrastructure for software devel- These include enterprise resource planning, opment, computing, data storage and query; customer relationship management, manu- and a comprehensive search capability that facturing execution systems, Web portals, leads the industry. groupware, email, search, mapping software, Google Enterprise enables manufacturers to and on and on. work together more easily; visualize their busi- Yet, some of the most basic functions—such ness data; build, store, and scale applications as enabling employees around the globe to and websites on Google’s cloud; and find the communicate and collaborate securely and information they need when they need it. reliably from any location—continue to pose challenges for manufacturers. Similarly, the WORK BETTER TOGETHER ability to search an ERP system for sales leads, More than 5 million businesses depend on or to create a geographic view of customer Google Apps for Business to help employees concentration in a specific region, should be collaborate and be more productive, wher- easy for most business users, but often requires ever and whenever they work. With hosted an IT specialist. documents including text, spreadsheets and For manufacturers struggling with the presentations, Web-based video access and complexity and cost of these systems, Google easy site-building tools, Google Apps makes Enterprise offers a simple, yet elegant, suite information accessible from just about any of applications and tools designed to make browser or smartphone.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitbyroad.Com Creates Australia's Most Comprehensive Online Tourism Platform with Google Maps & Google Search Appliance
    Case Study | Google Maps API and Google Search Appliance Visitbyroad.com creates Australia’s most comprehensive online tourism platform with Google Maps & Google Search Appliance Company With the tagline ”Enjoy the Journey,” Visitbyroad, which began operations in 2013, is arguably Australia’s best online trip-planning website. Users can search, create, save, edit, and share personalised itineraries via At a Glance Twitter, Facebook, print, or emailed PDFs that include dynamic, map- What they wanted to do based planning, photos, and the quickest route-driving directions. • Create Australia’s most comprehensive They can customise their own journeys, including attractions, events, online tourism platform • Unite supply with demand for operators business listings, daily deals, and accommodations available along the way. and tourists on the road Unlike other sites, Visitbyroad does not charge for booking; instead, the • Provide users with a high functionality, goal is to become the website of choice for those who want to make user friendly, map-based digital every journey a memorable experience. travel platform • Use the world’s leading search and Challenge mapping technology provider to Co-founders Randall Walker and Peter Hale have more than 50 years of ensure market-leading capabilities combined experience in regional tourism, and conducted two years of • Run the business efficiently research before embarking on Visitbyroad. They found that the most What they did common feedback from people arriving at a destination for a short stay was • Partnered with DMSBT to integrate Google that they did not understand all that was available to see and do in the area. Maps API and the Google Search Appliance If they had, they may have stayed longer or enjoyed the experience more.
    [Show full text]
  • Google's Management Change and the Enterprise
    STEPHEN E ARNOLD APRIL 20, 2011 Google’s Management Change and the Enterprise Google completed its management shift in April 2011 with several bold moves. The story of founder Larry Page’s move to the pilot’s seat appeared in most news, financial, and consumer communication channels. American business executives have a status similar to that accorded film and rock and roll stars. An aspect of the changes implemented in his first week on the job as the top Googler included some surprising, and potentially far reaching shifts in the $30 billion search and advertising giant. First, a number of executive shifts took place. Jonathan Rosenberg, the senior vice president of product management, left the company on the day Mr. Page officially assumed Mr. Schmidt’s duties. Mr. Rosenberg, a bright and engaging professional, was not a technologist’s technologist. I would characterize Mr. Rosenberg as a manager and a sales professional. The rumor that Mr. Rosenberg and Mr. Schmidt would write a book about their experiences at Google surfaced and then disappeared. The ideas was intriguing and reinforced the Charlie Sheen-magnetism senior business executives engender in the post-crash US. The echo from the door snicking shut had not faded when Mr. Page announced a shift in the top management of the company. For example, Sundar Pichai http://www.thechromesource.com/sundar-pichai- chrome-and-chrome-os-vp-being-courted-by-twitter/ (who has been at Google since 2004 and was allegedly recruited by Twitter) took over Chrome, Google’s Web browser and possible mobile device operating system alternative to Android.
    [Show full text]
  • The Visual Arts EVA 2012 Florence 9 – 11 May 2012
    Proceedings e report 88 Electronic Imaging & the Visual Arts EVA 2012 Florence 9 – 11 May 2012 edited by Vito Cappellini Firenze University Press 2012 Electronic Imaging & the Visual Arts : EVA 2012 Florence / edited by Vito Cappellini. – Firenze : Firenze University Press, 2012. (Proceedings e report ; 88) http://digital.casalini.it/9788866551300 ISBN 978-88-6655-127-0 (print) ISBN 978-88-6655-130-0 (online) Peer Review Process All publications are submitted to an external refereeing process under the responsibility of the FUP Editorial Board and the Scientific Committees of the individual series. The works published in the FUP catalogue are evaluated and approved by the Editorial Board of the publishing house. For a more detailed description of the refereeing process we refer to the official documents published on the website and in the online catalogue of the FUP (http://www.fupress.com). Firenze University Press Editorial Board G. Nigro (Coordinatore), M.T. Bartoli, M. Boddi, F. Cambi, R. Casalbuoni, C. Ciappei, R. Del Punta, A. Dolfi, V. Fargion, S. Ferrone, M. Garzaniti, P. Guarnieri, G. Mari, M. Marini, M. Verga, A. Zorzi. © 2012 Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze Firenze University Press Borgo Albizi, 28, 50122 Firenze, Italy http://www.fupress.com/ Printed in Italy PROGRAM Electronic Imaging the Visual Arts ‘The Foremost European Electronic Imaging Events in the Visual Arts’ Forum for Users, Suppliers & Researchers The key aim of this Event is to provide a forum for the user, supplier and scientific research communities to meet and exchange experiences, ideas and plans in the wide area of Culture & Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Vendor Contract
    d/W^sEKZ'ZDEd ĞƚǁĞĞŶ t'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚ͕>>ĂŶĚ d,/EdZ>K>WhZ,^/E'^z^dD;d/W^Ϳ &Žƌ Z&Wϭϴ1102 Internet & Network Security 'ĞŶĞƌĂů/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ dŚĞsĞŶĚŽƌŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ;͞ŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ͟ͿŵĂĚĞĂŶĚĞŶƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŽďLJĂŶĚďĞƚǁĞĞŶdŚĞ/ŶƚĞƌůŽĐĂů WƵƌĐŚĂƐŝŶŐ^LJƐƚĞŵ;ŚĞƌĞŝŶĂĨƚĞƌƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚƚŽĂƐ͞d/W^͟ƌĞƐƉĞĐƚĨƵůůLJͿĂŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝǀĞ ƉƵƌĐŚĂƐŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞĚďLJƚŚĞZĞŐŝŽŶϴĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĞŶƚĞƌ͕ŚĂǀŝŶŐŝƚƐƉƌŝŶĐŝƉĂůƉůĂĐĞ ŽĨďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂƚϰϴϰϱh^,ǁLJϮϳϭEŽƌƚŚ͕WŝƚƚƐďƵƌŐ͕dĞdžĂƐϳϱϲϴϲ͘dŚŝƐŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞ ƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚďĞůŽǁ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐŽĨĂůůƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĚŚĞƌĞŝŶ͘/ŶƚŚĞĞǀĞŶƚŽĨ ĂĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚďĞůŽǁĂŶĚƚŚŽƐĞĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞĚŝŶĂŶLJƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ͕ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚƐŚĂůůĐŽŶƚƌŽů͘ dŚĞǀĞŶĚŽƌŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂŶĚŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞďLJƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŚŝƐŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ͕ƚŚĞƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚ ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚĞƌŵƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶLJĂŐƌĞĞĚƵƉŽŶĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĂůůŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ ŽĨƚŚĞƐŽůŝĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶĂƐƉŽƐƚĞĚ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂŶLJĂĚĚĞŶĚĂĂŶĚƚŚĞĂǁĂƌĚĞĚǀĞŶĚŽƌ͛ƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĂů͘͘KƚŚĞƌ ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐƚŽďĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂƌĞƚŚĞĂǁĂƌĚĞĚǀĞŶĚŽƌ͛ƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůƐ͕ƚĂƐŬŽƌĚĞƌƐ͕ƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞŽƌĚĞƌƐĂŶĚĂŶLJ ĂĚũƵƐƚŵĞŶƚƐǁŚŝĐŚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶŝƐƐƵĞĚ͘/ĨĚĞǀŝĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚƚŽd/W^ďLJƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐŝŶŐǀĞŶĚŽƌĂƐ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJĂŶĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƐŽůŝĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ƚŚŝƐŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚŵĂLJďĞĂŵĞŶĚĞĚƚŽŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂŶLJ ĂŐƌĞĞĚĚĞǀŝĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƉĂŐĞƐǁŝůůĐŽŶƐƚŝƚƵƚĞƚŚĞŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨƵůǀĞŶĚŽƌƐ;ƐͿĂŶĚd/W^͘ ŝĚĚĞƌƐƐŚĂůůƐƚĂƚĞ͕ŝŶĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞǁƌŝƚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƌƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ͕ĂŶLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ ĞdžĐĞƉƚŝŽŶƐŽƌĚĞǀŝĂƚŝŽŶƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐĞƚĞƌŵƐ͕ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘/ĨĂŐƌĞĞĚƚŽďLJd/W^͕ƚŚĞLJ ǁŝůůďĞŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ͘ WƵƌĐŚĂƐĞKƌĚĞƌ͕ŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚŽƌŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŝƐƚŚĞd/W^DĞŵďĞƌ͛ƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐƚŚĞ ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƚŽƉƌŽĐĞĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŶĞŐŽƚŝĂƚĞĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJŽƌĚĞƌƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ͘^ƉĞĐŝĂůƚĞƌŵƐ
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Alphabet and Google, 2017
    This research note is restricted to the personal use of [email protected]. Understanding Alphabet and Google, 2017 Published: 24 February 2017 ID: G00297707 Analyst(s): Tom Austin, David Mitchell Smith, Yefim V. Natis, Isabelle Durand, Ray Valdes, Bettina Tratz-Ryan, Roberta Cozza, Daniel O'Connell, Lydia Leong, Jeffrey Mann, Andrew Frank, Brian Blau, Chris Silva, Mark Hung, Adam Woodyer, Matthew W. Cain, Steve Riley, Martin Reynolds, Whit Andrews, Alexander Linden, David Yockelson, Joe Mariano Google's size, market differentiation, rapid pace of innovation and ambitions can complicate fully understanding the vendor and its fit to current digital business needs. CIOs and IT leaders can use this report to explore in detail selected topics from the Gartner Vendor Rating. Key Findings ■ Two outcomes are apparent more than a year after the creation of the Alphabet-Google structure: Google is beginning to show increased momentum and has made significant investments in its enterprise offerings (most of its 2016 acquisitions were focused on this); and it is applying more discipline in Alphabet's "Other Bets." ■ Google is flourishing despite challenging external market factors: adverse publicity, competitors, government regulators and law enforcement. ■ Google values data, encourages bold investments in long-term horizons, pivots plans based on results in near real time, and reveres user-oriented engineering excellence. ■ Google is fully committed to 100% cloud-based and web-scale infrastructure, massive scaling, the maximum rate of change, and stream-lined business processes for itself and its customers. Recommendations CIOs and IT leaders managing vendor risk and performance should: ■ Plan for a long-term strategic relationship with Google based on an assumption that "what you see is what you get." Major vendor changes to core culture and fundamental operating principles in response to customer requests usually come slowly, if at all.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Search Engines
    A blog network is a group of blogs that are connected to each other in a network. A blog network can either be a group of loosely connected blogs, or a group of blogs that are owned by the same company. The purpose of such a network is usually to promote the other blogs in the same network and therefore increase the advertising revenue generated from online advertising on the blogs.[1] List of search engines From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For knowing popular web search engines see, see Most popular Internet search engines. This is a list of search engines, including web search engines, selection-based search engines, metasearch engines, desktop search tools, and web portals and vertical market websites that have a search facility for online databases. Contents 1 By content/topic o 1.1 General o 1.2 P2P search engines o 1.3 Metasearch engines o 1.4 Geographically limited scope o 1.5 Semantic o 1.6 Accountancy o 1.7 Business o 1.8 Computers o 1.9 Enterprise o 1.10 Fashion o 1.11 Food/Recipes o 1.12 Genealogy o 1.13 Mobile/Handheld o 1.14 Job o 1.15 Legal o 1.16 Medical o 1.17 News o 1.18 People o 1.19 Real estate / property o 1.20 Television o 1.21 Video Games 2 By information type o 2.1 Forum o 2.2 Blog o 2.3 Multimedia o 2.4 Source code o 2.5 BitTorrent o 2.6 Email o 2.7 Maps o 2.8 Price o 2.9 Question and answer .
    [Show full text]
  • PDF, 300 Pages
    Developing Web Analytics Best Practices for NIH Report Semphonic 16 Digital Drive Suite 220 Novato, CA 94949 www.semphonic.com December 15, 2011 The Needs Assessment for Developing Best Practices for Trans-NIH Web Analytics was funded by the NIH Evaluation Set-Aside Program, (Reference number: 10-4031 OD-OCPL), administered by the Office of Program Evaluation and Performance, DPCPSI, Office of the Director Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. ES.1 Commitment of Senior Management .............................................................................................. ES.2 Organizational Resources and Responsibilities ................................................................................ ES.2 Process for NIH-Wide and IC-Specific Web Analytics Governance .................................................. ES.3 Web Analytics Metrics and Deep-Dive Analysis ............................................................................... ES.4 Web Analytics Solutions, Methods, and Opportunities ................................................................... ES.4 Web Analytics Training, Data Analysis, and Interpretation of Data ................................................ ES.5 More Information ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C a S E 216 G How Works O Thatruns Across Its Worldwide Data Centers
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The way the company manages information technology often goes unnoticed. But Google‘s unconventional approach to information management is both highly effective and highly efficient—and may be the way other organiza- tions deploy technology in the future. Here’s why. Google CASE 216 A D I S S E C TION GOOGLE How C A S E 2 1 6 Google BY DAVID F. CARR With his unruly hair dipping across his forehead, Douglas Merrill walks up to the lec- tern set up in a ballroom of the Arizona Biltmore Resort and Spa, looking like a slightly rumpled university professor about to start a lecture. In fact, he is here on this April Worksmorning to talk about his work as director of internal technology for Google to a crowd of chief information officers gathered at a breakfast sponsored by local recruiting firm Phoenix Staffing. Google, the secretive, extraordinarily successful $6.1 billion global search engine company, is one of the most recognized brands in the world. Yet it selectively discusses its innovative information management infrastructure—which is based on one of the largest distributed computing/grid systems in the world. Merrill is about to give his audience a rare glimpse into the future according to Google, and explain the workings of the company and the computer systems behind it. For all the razzle-dazzle surrounding Google—everything from the press it gets for its bring-your-dog-to-work casual workplace, to its stock price, market share, dizzying array of beta product launches and its death-match competition with Microsoft—it must also solve more basic issues like billing, collection, reporting revenue, tracking projects, hiring contractors, recruiting and evaluating employees, and managing video- conferencing systems—in other words, common business problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Assettrackr Maps Their Mobile Assets on Google with Mediaagility a Case Study by Mediaagility
    AssetTrackr Maps Their Mobile Assets On Google With MediaAgility A Case Study by MediaAgility AssetTrackr is a tracking solution company which makes use of Global Positioning System(GPS) and GPRS technologies for tracking movable assets. AssetTrackr has partnered with a reputed US based company that develops the telematics hardware for major automotive manufacturers. The company has built a solution for tracking and managing hazardous material transport, cars, buses, and cargo vehicles etc. AssetTrackr uses the Global Positioning System(GPS) technology to track devices on Google Maps. Using the Maps technology by Google; the exact position of any moveable asset can be easily tracked. Not only the assets are tracked on computer but their locations can also be traced on a smartphone. The lat-long coordinates of the fleet are identified with this application. By using Google Maps with GPS any vehicle can be tracked in real time and any missing vehicle can be located thus preventing misuse of stolen vehicle. More and more logistics companies are using this technology as they can track the position of their field assets with accuracy and easily coordinate with clients accordingly. Google Maps has proved to be a mandate for tracking companies worldwide. “Google Maps is very popular in India and people are already familiar with the interfaces provided by Google which is very intuitive and easy to use. Google has mapped the Indian terrain quite extensively including remote terrains. As we are committed to providing the best user experience to our customers, we opted to go with Google Maps for Work.” says Vikas Minda, Co Founder of AssetTrackr.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] Suzanna Kim 312.404.0601
    [email protected] Suzanna Kim 312.404.0601 http://www. kickassninja.com (beta) Education Skills Summary Computer Science, BS Management DePaul University June 2003 Worked with stakeholders to determine deliverables. Lead multiple Dean’s List / Honors Student development teams within international and remote organizations. Mentored developers’ technical and business growth. Certifications/Badges Architecture Architected proposals and proof of concepts for best practices, Salesforce Trailhead backend, frontend, cloud, mobile solutions for internal and customer Mountaineer Badge October 2019 facing products at international exposure levels. Coordinated with Coursera stakeholders to create optimal user experiences and deliverable Cloud Computing Applications Part 2 roadmaps with risk and reward analysis. November 2019 Enterprise Solutions Dev/Ops Cloud Computing Applications Part 1 September 2019 WorkFusion Google Cloud, G-Suite Agile with Atlassian Jira May 2019 DataIku AWS SharePoint, FAST Shell scripting, PowerShell WorkFusion ElasticSearch Jenkins ML Automation August 2019 Salesforce RTC, Build Forge Machine Learning Basics May 2019 Adobe AEM Azure RPA Applications May 2019 Dell Boomi RPA Core May 2019 Google Search Appliance Backend Mastering the Business Process Aspire Mongo, Postgres, MYSQL, SQL May 2019 Server, Oracle, SSRS Power User Basics May 2019 Frontend Java, Groovy, Spring Boot Automation Essentials November 2018 Angular, React, PrimeNG, Node, PHP, C#, C++, VB.Net ExtJs, SASS, LESS, Bootstrap Apex Dell Boomi PWA, AMP, Objective-C,
    [Show full text]