LIVESTOCK GUARDIAN DOGS TOMPKINS CONSERVATION WILDLIFE BULLETIN NUMBER 2, MARCH 2017
Livestock vs. Predators TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction to an historical conflict and its mitigation PAGE 01
through the use of livestock guardian dogs Livestock vs. Predators: Introduction to an historical conflict and its mitigation through the use Since humans began domesti- stock and wild predators. Histor- of livestock guardian dogs cating animals, it has been nec- ically, humans have attempted PAGE 04 essary to protect livestock from to resolve this conflict through Livestock Guardian Dogs, wild predators. To this day, pre- a series of predator population an Ancient Tool in dation of livestock is one of the control measures including the Modern Times most prominent global hu- use of traps, hunting, and indis- PAGE 06 man-wildlife conflicts. Interest- criminate and nonselective poi- What Is the Job of a ingly, one of our most ancient soning—methods which are of- Livestock Guardian Dog? domestic companions, the dog, ten cruel and inefficient. was once a predator. One of the greatest chal- PAGE 07 The competition between lenges lies in successfully im- Breeds of Livestock man and wildlife for natural plementing effective measures Guardian Dogs
spaces and resources is often that mitigate the negative im- PAGE 08
considered the main source of pacts of this conflict. It is imper- The Presence of Livestock conflict between domestic live- ative to ensure the protection of Guardian Dogs in Chile WILDLIFE BULLETIN NUMBER 2 MARCH 2017
man and his resources, includ- tion in predators is lower than PAGE 10 ing livestock, without compro- that of the United States, where Livestock in the Chacabuco Valley mising the conservation of the the losses are due to a variety of and the Transition Toward the Future Patagonia National Park native biodiversity. Every species predator species (Figure 1). It is plays a key role in the regula- also necessary to acknowledge PAGE 11 tion of the ecosystems that they that many farmers do not re- Livestock Guardian Dogs: (and we) inhabit and, as such, port their losses. Some U.S. states A Fix to the Challenges of Modern Conservation their survival must be protect- compensate for predator deaths, ed. Additionally, it is important but only with on-site verification PAGE 13 to note that the majority of na- of a predator attack. The Measured Effect tive species, such as foxes and In addition, one recurring of Livestock Guardian Dogs puma, are under legal protec- example of the human-wildlife on Sheep Survival Rates tion by the state of Chile. conflict in Chile is the predation PAGE 15
The economic losses caused of domesticated livestock. Among Impact and Results by predators are frequently one the species commonly involved of the Program of the main reasons sheep and are native wild carnivores such PAGE 17 goat producers abandon their as the culpeo fox (Lycalopex cul- Challenges in the livestock-rearing efforts or paeus), chilla fox (Lycalopex gri- Implementation of the Livestock keep them at a subsistent level. seus), puma (Puma concolor), and Guardian Dog Program
It is estimated that in the Unit- even introduced species such as PAGE 19 ed States at least 250,000 sheep the domesticated dog (Canis lupus The People Behind the Care and 150,000 goats die annual- familiaris) and American mink and Management of the Dogs: ly as a resultP rdidas of predation de (Vor vinos- (Neovison aprinos vison). This por conflict • José Calderón Montecinos wald, 2007). In Chile, the varia- generates significant econom- • Eduardo Castro Ibáñez Predador spec ico en stados nidos • Víctor Hernán Chacón
PAGE 21
Predator Amount Percentage Technical Notes: Livestock Guardian Dogs Coyotes 135,600 .
Dogs 29,800 .
Pumas 12,700 .
Lynxes 11,100 .
Bears 8,500 .
Eagles 6,300 .
Foxes 4,200 .
Others 16,000 .
Total 224.200 100
Figure 1. Ovine and caprine animal losses in the United States, organized by specific predator.
PAGE 2 WILDLIFE BULLETIN NUMBER 2 MARCH 2017
ic losses for small, medium, and large-scale farmers alike. Addition- auses o do estic sheep predation ally, livestock predation can jeopar- dize the conservation of these wild in the s n Re ion carnivores, largely through illegal hunting. There is little data available at the national level with regards to Culpeo o predator-livestock dynamics. At the 1 regional level, a survey of the impact ild ogs of predators on sheep carried out in the Aysén region in 2007 (Iriarte, Mink 2007) found that more than 50% of 2 Puma losses were associated with foxes, followed by 23% of losses attribut- able to feral dogs, 15% to mink, and 9% to puma (Figure 2).
More recently, through the Figure 2. Causes of domestic sheep predation in the Aysén analysis of livestock losses report- region, according to farmer observations, 2007. ed to the Agricultural and Live- stock Service, dogs, foxes, and pu- causes of livestock mortality, with region (Figure 3) (Acosta-Jamett, mas have been shown to be the main percentages varying according to 2014). For the Aysén region, more losses are attributed to native pred- ators, such as puma and foxes. Percenta e o s all cattle predation Historically, the conflict be- reported re ion tween predators and ranchers, both worldwide and in Chile, has been managed through culling predator Puma populations. Despite this the con- o flict has not been resolved, and in many cases has even been aggravat- og ed by such practices. Recently, the use of non-lethal, predator-friendly methods, such as livestock guard-