Thomson, Graeme M. (2014) Heirs of the Revolution: the Founding Heritage in American Presidential Rhetoric Since 1945

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thomson, Graeme M. (2014) Heirs of the Revolution: the Founding Heritage in American Presidential Rhetoric Since 1945 Thomson, Graeme M. (2014) Heirs of the revolution: the founding heritage in American presidential rhetoric since 1945. PhD thesis http://theses.gla.ac.uk/5103/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Heirs of the Revolution: The Founding Heritage in American Presidential Rhetoric Since 1945 Graeme Michael Thomson MA MLitt Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities College of Arts University of Glasgow October 2013 2 Abstract The history of the United States’ revolutionary origins has been a persistently prevalent source of reference in the public speeches of modern American presidents. Through an examination of the character and context of allusions to this history in presidential rhetoric since 1945, this thesis presents an explanation for this ubiquity. America’s founding heritage represents a valuable – indeed, an essential – source for the purposes of presidential oratory. An analysis of the manner in which presidents from Harry Truman to Barack Obama have invoked and adapted specific aspects of this heritage in their public rhetoric exposes a distinctly usable past, employed in different contexts and in advancing specific messages. Chapters devoted to the references of modern presidents to the Declaration of Independence, to the Constitution, and to four of the nation’s Founding Fathers, demonstrate that distinct elements of the founding heritage can be invoked in different ways. In sum, however, they reveal that allusions to this history have served three, sometimes overlapping, purposes in modern presidential discourse. Firstly, and most commonly, this history has proved an essential source on the numerous occasions in which presidents have reflected upon and reaffirmed the enduring character of American national identity. Secondly, such is the prominence of the founding heritage in the collective memory of Americans that presidents have been able to invoke elements of this familiar history pertinent to their discussion of a diverse range of contemporary concerns. Finally, and most significantly, this rhetoric has very often been applied for more pragmatic and partisan reasons. Given the veneration of the founding heritage in American culture and the acceptance that the democratic ideals then established remain essential to the purpose and direction of the nation, this thesis argues that presidents have found political value in implying their own inheritance of the Founders’ incontestable legacy. In speeches delivered across the shifting contexts of the post-war period, presidents have explicitly aligned their policy goals with the values and vision of the nation’s first leaders, interpreting and adapting the Founders’ words in a manner supportive of their public message. 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Note on Sources 5 I: Modern American Presidents and the Founding Heritage 6 Chapter 1: Introduction 6 Chapter 2: Heirs of the Revolution 22 II: The Founding Documents 51 Chapter 3: The Declaration of Independence 54 Chapter 4: The Constitution 79 III: The Founding Fathers 104 Chapter 5: Washington, Franklin and Paine 107 Chapter 6: Jefferson 139 IV: Conclusion 167 Bibliography 175 4 Acknowledgements This project could not have been completed without the generous financial assistance of several institutions. I am enormously grateful to the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the College of Arts at the University of Glasgow for granting the studentship that allowed me to pursue this work. My sincere thanks are owed also to the awards committees at the British Association for American Studies, the American Politics Group, and the Department of History at Glasgow. Their significant contributions towards my travel costs made possible my research in Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. For a hugely valuable and enjoyable month in Charlottesville, I am indebted finally to the fellowship committee at the Robert H. Smith International Center for Jefferson Studies. The aid and advice of the welcoming staff and scholars working at the Center was invaluable during a month in which the progress of my thesis advanced significantly. I thank them and so too James Green and the staff at the Library Company of Philadelphia, who helped me find my feet in the early days. There are several people without whom I could not have completed this long and challenging process. I am indebted first to my supervisors, Professor Simon Newman and Dr. Marina Moskowitz. Their advice, their understanding and their consistent faith in and enthusiasm for my project has been of great support. In the Department of History at Glasgow, I have been grateful for the company and help of staff and students over many years. Particular mention is owed to May Rosenthal, my friend and officemate, and to Alison Peden, a constant source of help and kindness. She is much missed. I will forever feel fortunate to have had the love and unerring support of Lisa Main, in whose company I began this project and shared so much else. Without family and friends, I simply could not have weathered the challenges of the last four years. When personal circumstances obscured my work and much else besides, it was on them that I relied. For their kindness, their humour, their comfort and their advice, I am especially grateful to Anna Miles, Laura Tansley, Craig Currie, Micaela Maftei, Gemma Tougher and Matt Brennan. I thank too my brother and his family. My greatest thanks are reserved, as ever, for my parents, the wisest of advisers and the most caring of supporters. I dedicate this work to the memory of my grandfather. His yellowing map of the United States has hung above my desk for the past four years, a reminder always of a forebear truly worth emulating. 5 Note on Sources: A project of this scope would not have been possible without access to The American Presidency Project, the only online resource that has consolidated and coded into a single searchable database the ‘Public Papers of the Presidents’. Established in 1999 at the University of California, the archive contains the vast majority of the president’s public messages, statements, speeches, and news conference remarks, collated from the Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States (Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, various dates). Every presidential speech cited in this thesis is drawn from The American Presidency Project database. To include a long website address for every individual speech cited would have resulted in extremely cumbersome footnotes. In each case, therefore, I have included simply the author/speaker, and the title and date of the speech as it appears in the online archive. Every presidential speech cited was accessed via the search function in the ‘Public Papers of the Presidents’ section of the website: John Woolley and Gerhard Peters ed., ‘The Public Papers of the Presidents’, The American Presidency Project (http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/#axzz2gVQdSVpU) [1999-2013]. Individual speeches can easily be retrieved through searching ‘By Month and Year’, or by performing specific word or phrase searches. 6 I. Modern American Presidents and the Founding Heritage 1. Introduction On the afternoon of July 4, 2013, the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C. was a lively scene. Several hundred military personnel and their families had been invited to the president’s official residence to celebrate the 237th anniversary of American independence. Children ran between the red, white and blue tables on the grass; smoke rose from a barbecue; the uniformed members of the Marine Band readied themselves to perform. President Barack Obama, emerging on the south portico to address the crowd, did not intend to speak for long. ‘I don’t want to keep you from the food’, he said. He wanted though to explain, especially to the children listening, what was ‘so special’ about the day, what made it more than ‘an excuse for some hotdogs’. What followed was a summary of the nation’s origins familiar to all Americans: On July 4, 1776, a small band of patriots declared that we were a people created equal, free to think and worship and live as we please; that our destiny would not be determined for us, it would be determined by us. And it was bold and it was brave. And it was unprecedented; it was unthinkable. At that time in human history, it was kings and princes and emperors who made decisions. But those patriots knew there was a better way of doing things, that freedom was possible, and that to achieve their freedom, they'd be willing to lay down their lives, their fortunes, their honor. And so they fought a revolution. And few would have bet on their side, but for the first time of many times to come, America proved the doubters wrong. The president offered more than a history lesson. He emphasised that America’s revolutionary birth established a sense of direction and purpose that has guided the nation ever since: And now, 237 years later, this improbable experiment in democracy, the United States of America, stands as the greatest nation on Earth. And what makes us great is, not our size or our wealth, but our values and our ideals and the fact that we're willing to fight for them.
Recommended publications
  • SOPHIA ROSENFELD Education: Harvard University, Ph.D. in History
    SOPHIA ROSENFELD Education: Harvard University, Ph.D. in History, 1996; Princeton University, B. A. summa in History, 1988 Current Employment: Walter H. Annenberg Professor of History, University of Pennsylvania, 2017- Previous Employment: Professor of History, Yale University, 2015-2016; Professor of History (and previously Associate and Assistant Professor of History), University of Virginia, 1995-2016 Fellowships and Visiting Appointments: Member of the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Studies (Princeton), 2014- 15; Guggenheim Foundation Fellow, 2013-14; American Philosophical Society Senior Library Fellow, 2013-14; Visiting Professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, 2008-09; Visiting Professor at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (Paris), 2004; ACLS Burkhardt Fellow, 2004-5; Mellon New Directions Fellow, 2003-04; Remarque Institute at NYU Postdoctoral Fellow, 1999-2000 Major Publications: *Common Sense: A Political History (Harvard, 2011), winner of the Mark Lynton History Prize (2012) and the Society for the History of the Early American Republic Book Prize (2011); translated into French and Korean *A Revolution in Language: The Problem of Signs in Late Eighteenth-Century France (Stanford, 2001) *Refereed articles in the American Historical Review, Journal of Modern History, William and Mary Quarterly, Early American Studies, French Historical Studies, National Identities, etc. *Articles in edited volumes on European, American, and global history, including recently The Worlds of American Intellectual History, ed. Joel Isaac, James Kloppenberg et al (2016); The Princeton Companion to Atlantic History, ed. Joseph Miller (2015); A Cultural History of the Senses in the Enlightenment, ed. Anne Vila (2014); Penser l’Europe au XVIIIe siècle, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Historysummer 2015 Deans About Paths to Take
    Department of HistorySummer 2015 deans about paths to take. Our From the 2014-2015 Department students were equally successful in Chair, Daniel Smail completing dissertations and honors As I write this in the heat of a July theses and garnering awards, jobs, afternoon, the snows of yesteryear positions, and many grants and have receded from memory and the fellowships. To survey the titles of Yard is filled instead with summer- our dissertations and theses is to be school students and great drifts of amazed not only by the diversity of tourists. Most of our faculty and themes, spanning time and place, also students are off teaching or pursuing by the restless ambition and energy of the authors. Outgoing Department research projects or internships in places all over the world. For those Chair (2014-2015) In the fall of 2014, we welcomed two Daniel Smail who remain, Widener is now at its new colleagues to the ranks of the best, for the summer brings with it time to read and to explore at junior faculty. Elizabeth Hinton leisure, and the dreaded words (History and AAAS), a scholar of “Checked out: due 02/10/16” are U.S. African-American and urban few and far between as you browse history, joined us after two years at the catalog. In September, the the Michigan Society of Fellows. department will become its Genevieve Clutario (History and animated self again as faculty and History & Literature) did not students return with energies officially begin her appointment as a renewed and new things to learn and historian of gender and culture until July of 2015, but we were delighted teach, but for now, all is quiet, apart that she could join us as a College Incoming Department from the occasional noise drifting up Fellow for the year and teach two Chair (2015-2016) from the renovation of the first floor courses in the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Katlyn Marie Carter University of Notre Dame 434 Decio Hall Notre Dame, in 46556 (510) 725-9768 | [email protected]
    Katlyn Marie Carter University of Notre Dame 434 Decio Hall Notre Dame, IN 46556 (510) 725-9768 | [email protected] Appointments 2020- Assistant Professor | Department of History, University of Notre Dame 2019-20 Visiting Assistant Professor | Department of History, University of Notre Dame 2017-19 Postdoctoral Fellow | Weiser Center for Emerging Democracies, University of Michigan Education 2017 Ph.D., History | Princeton University Dissertation: “Practicing Politics in the Revolutionary Atlantic World: Secrecy, Publicity, and the Making of Modern Democracy” Committee: David A. Bell (adviser), Sean Wilentz, Linda Colley, Wendy Warren, Sophia Rosenfeld (University of Pennsylvania) 2013 M.A., History | Princeton University 2009 B.A., High Honors in History | University of California, Berkeley Publications Book Manuscript Under Contract Houses of Glass: Secrecy, Transparency, and the Birth of Representative Democracy, under contract with Yale University Press Peer Reviewed Journal Articles: August 2020 “Denouncing Secrecy and Defining Democracy in the Early American Republic,” in the Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 40, No. 3 (Fall 2020), pp. 409-433. March 2018 “The Comités des Recherches: Procedural Secrecy and the Origins of Revolutionary Surveillance,” in French History, Vol. 32, No. 1 (March 3, 2018), pp. 45-65. 1 Book Reviews: 2020 Review of Les Fausses Nouvelles: Un millénaire de bruits et de rumeurs dans l’espace public français, eds. Philippe Bourdin and Stéphane Le Bras, in H-France Review, Vol. 20, no. 79 (May 2020) 2019 Review of A Politician Thinking: The Creative Mind of James Madison, by Jack N. Rakove, in the Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 38, no. 3 (Fall 2019) 2019 Review of American Honor: The Creation of the Nation’s Ideals During the Revolutionary Era, by Craig Bruce Smith, in The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Uses of Sign Language: the Case of the French Revolution
    7KH3ROLWLFDO8VHVRI6LJQ/DQJXDJH7KH&DVHRIWKH )UHQFK5HYROXWLRQ 6RSKLD$5RVHQIHOG Sign Language Studies, Volume 6, Number 1, Fall 2005, pp. 17-37 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\*DOODXGHW8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/sls.2006.0009 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/sls/summary/v006/6.1rosenfeld.html Access provided by Yale University Library (27 Feb 2016 21:25 GMT) SOPHIA ROSENFELD The Political Uses of Sign Language: The Case of the French Revolution The story of the Abbe´ de l’E´ pe´ e and the founding of the Paris Institute for the Deaf long ago entered the realm of legend. Competing versions of the story can be found in movies, paintings, novels, and memoirs, as well as scholarly accounts spanning more than two centuries. Even today, a modestly revised account of de l’E´pe´e’s achievements continues to provide a foundational ‘‘creation myth’’ for the discipline of Deaf history. The basic facts are easily retold: In the early 1760s, a French Jan- senist cleric named Charles-Michel de l’E´ pe´e met two deaf sisters. Inspired by the idea of making these girls into ‘‘citizens’’ and ‘‘Chris- tians,’’ he set to work learning their natural language. Then, with their help, de l’E´ pe´e spent most of the decade trying to ‘‘perfect’’ this idiom, by which he meant expand it to represent abstract concepts important to religion and metaphysics, subject it to the rules of gen- eral grammar, and codify it. The result was what he labeled ‘‘me- thodical’’ sign language. It was also the establishment of a free school that eventually became the first national institution in the world for educating deaf people.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo ROUNDTABLE XXII-31
    H-Diplo ROUNDTABLE XXII-31 David A. Bell. Men on Horseback: The Power of Charisma in the Age of Revolution. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux, 2020. ISBN: 9780374207922 (hardcover, $30.00). 15 March 2021 | https://hdiplo.org/to/RT22-31 Editor: Diane Labrosse | Production Editor: George Fujii Contents Introduction by Sophia Rosenfeld, University of Pennsylvania ........................................................................................................... 2 Review by David Armitage, Harvard University ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Review by Dan Edelstein, Stanford University ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Review by Beatrice de Graaf, Utrecht University .................................................................................................................................. 13 Review by Ido de Haan, Utrecht University ............................................................................................................................................ 16 Review by Christine Haynes, University of North Carolina at Charlotte ....................................................................................... 21 Response by David A. Bell, Princeton University ................................................................................................................................... 25 H-Diplo
    [Show full text]