DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FINAL REPORT SILVER LANE (SR 502) CORRIDOR STUDY EAST HARTFORD, CT February 19, 2020 Silver Lane Corridor Study Draft Final Report February 19, 2020 Prepared for: Capitol Region Council of Governments 241 Main Street Hartford, CT 06106 Prepared by: TranSystems Corporation 530 Preston Avenue Meriden, CT 06450 With the assistance of: Fitzgerald & Halliday Inc. 416 Asylum Street Hartford, CT, 06103 Silver Lane CorridorCorridor Study – Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Conditions Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 2 Future Conditions Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 4 Analysis of Alternatives and Recommendations .................................................................................................... 6 Corridor-wide Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 6 Location-based Improvements .............................................................................................................................. 7 Interim Improvements ............................................................................................................................................... 12 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 1.1 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Study Process ................................................................................................................................................. 14 2. Existing Conditions Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Roadway and Traffic ..................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics ......................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.2 Roadway Standards .................................................................................................................................. 18 2.1.3 Geometric Conditions Review .............................................................................................................. 18 2.1.4 Traffic Conditions ..................................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.5 Crash History ............................................................................................................................................ 26 2.1.6 Access Management ................................................................................................................................. 28 2.1.7 Management of Special Events ............................................................................................................... 31 2.2 Land Use and Development ....................................................................................................................... 32 2.3 Pedestrians, Bicyclists and Vulnerable Users .......................................................................................... 33 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities .................................................................................................................................. 34 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities ......................................................................................................................................... 39 2.3.3 Multi-Use Trails ......................................................................................................................................... 39 2.4 Transit/Commuter Systems ........................................................................................................................ 41 2.4.1 Transit Service and Operations ............................................................................................................. 41 2.4.2 Park & Ride Facilities ................................................................................................................................ 46 3. Future Conditions Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 47 3.1 Future Development Potential ................................................................................................................... 47 3.1.1 Base Development Scenarios ................................................................................................................. 47 3.1.2 Build Development Scenarios ................................................................................................................ 48 3.2 Future Traffic Forecasts ............................................................................................................................... 50 3.2.1 Base Scenarios ........................................................................................................................................... 50 3.2.2 Build Scenarios .......................................................................................................................................... 53 3.3 Future Traffic Operations ........................................................................................................................... 56 3.3.1 Base Scenarios ........................................................................................................................................... 56 3.3.2 Build Scenario ............................................................................................................................................ 58 3.4 Future Transit Outlook ............................................................................................................................... 61 4. Analysis of Alternatives and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 62 ii Silver Lane CorridorCorridor Study – Final Report 4.1 Corridor-wide Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 62 4.1.1 Reconfigure Silver Lane with a Road Diet .......................................................................................... 63 4.1.2 Provide 10’ Side Paths ............................................................................................................................. 66 4.1.3 Transit Stop Amenities ............................................................................................................................ 69 4.1.4 Relocate Overhead Utilities ................................................................................................................... 70 4.2 Location-based Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 71 4.2.1 Route 15 On-Ramp .................................................................................................................................. 71 4.2.2 Route 15 Off-Ramp .................................................................................................................................. 72 4.2.3 Mercer Avenue / HOV Ramp ................................................................................................................ 73 4.2.4 Silver Lane Elementary School ............................................................................................................... 73 4.2.5 281-287 Silver Lane (Carl’s Barbecue) ................................................................................................ 74 4.2.6 Warren Drive ............................................................................................................................................ 75 4.2.7 306-310 Silver Lane (Tire City and Queen Pizza) ............................................................................. 75 4.2.8 Roberts Street / East Hartford Boulevard .......................................................................................... 75 4.2.9 467-483 Silver Lane .................................................................................................................................. 76 4.2.10 Gold Street ............................................................................................................................................ 76 4.2.11 583 Silver Lane ...................................................................................................................................... 77 4.2.12 Simmons Road / Rentschler Field ..................................................................................................... 77 4.2.13 708-720 Silver Lane (Burger King and Aaron’s) ........................................................................... 78 4.2.14 Silver
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State Owned and Maintained Structurally Deficient Bridges
    State Owned and Maintained Structurally Deficient Bridges (4,016 bridges - includes NHS, Non-NHS, NBI, and Non-NBI) Most Travelled (sorted by ADT) Data is based on the condition data of our entire bridge inventory (both NBI and Non-NBI bridges) at the time of the 2018 NBI submittal to FHWA on 03/15/18, which included inspection condition data due in 2017 and the most recent inspection condition data at the time of the submittal NBI 29: Average NBI 112: NBIS Daily Traffic (ADT) NBI 27: Year NBI 7: Facility Carried by Structure NBI 6A: Feature Intersected: NBI 4: City or Town NBI 104: Highway System of the Bridge Length [General Built [General Bridge No. Bridge Name [Classification] Narrative [Classification] [Classification] Inventory Route [Classification] [Classification] Information] Information] YANKEE DOODLE 1 00059 BRIDGE INTERSTATE-95 NORWALK RV,HENDRICKS AVE 56060 - NORWALK 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 145000 1957 2 06798 INTERSTATE-95 STUBBY PLAIN BROOK 47535 - MILFORD 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS No 137500 1958 3 00162 INTERSTATE-95 METRO NORTH 82870 - WEST HAVEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 136400 1956 4 03093 INTERSTATE 91 N FRONT ST & QUINN RIVER 52070 - NEW HAVEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 133900 1964 5 03094 INTERSTATE-91 AMTRAK RAILROAD 52070 - NEW HAVEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 133900 1965 BYRAM RIVER 6 00001 BRIDGE INTERSTATE-95 BYRAM RIVER,S WATER ST 33620 - GREENWICH 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 131600 1958 7 00062 INTERSTATE-95 ROUTE 33 83500 - WESTPORT 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS
    [Show full text]
  • Ctfastrak Existing Condition
    Hartford Line TOD Action Plan Desire & Readiness Workshop: Town of Windsor Locks October 20, 2016 State Project No. 170-3396 1 Task 8 Agenda 1. Project Background and Overview 2. TOD Principles and Precedents 3. CTrail Hartford Line Station Area Assessment • TOD Desire & Readiness Criteria • Initial Observations from the Project Team 4. Interactive Workshop • Preliminary Areas of Focus • Instructions 2 Project Background Establishing a Point of Departure in Windsor Locks • Hartford Line TOD Action Plan • Town of Windsor Locks POCD Update • Main Street Property Acquisition and • Windsor Locks TOD Study Pre-Development (OPM) • Making it Happen • CRCOG Regional Complete Streets Policy and Action Plan (OPM) • Historic Train Station Reuse Study Windsor Locks Downtown • Capitol Region Master Plan Transportation Plan 2007 2008 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Ongoing/Forthcoming • Incentive Housing Downtown TIF Zone Study District Master Plan • Capital Region POCD Town of Windsor Locks EA/EIE for NHHS Rail Program POCD 3 Project Background Initial Thoughts from the Project Team: Key Issues to Advance TOD in Windsor Locks Reinvigorate downtown/Main Street Activate and maximize development as a destination potential of catalytic sites in the station area . Address lasting impacts of urban . Target sites and recommended sequencing renewal, and change the mindset of Main have been identified, but there are Street as a pass through outstanding questions: . Find a balance between maintaining • What can be done to make sites more traffic flow and creating a pedestrian- attractive to potential developers? and bicycle-friendly downtown • Are there opportunities to assemble a critical mass of sites to enable a larger . Consider developing a downtown development proposition? parking strategy 4 Source: Windsor Locks TOD Study Project Background Funding through FTA Pilot Program for TOD Planning .
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bus Rapid Transit Feasiblity Study
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 MODES AND TRENDS THAT FACILITATE BRT ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Microtransit ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Shared Mobility .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Mobility Hubs ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Curbside Management .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3 VEHICLES THAT SUPPORT BRT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Automated Vehicles .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Weak Real-Estate Markets
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Masters Theses Student Scholarship Spring 2016 Transit-Oriented Development and Weak Real-Estate Markets Jonathan Cabral [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/grad Part of the Economic Policy Commons, Infrastructure Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Cabral, Jonathan, "Transit-Oriented Development and Weak Real-Estate Markets" (2016). Masters Theses. 25. https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/grad/25 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Trinity College Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trinity College Digital Repository. TRINITY COLLEGE Final Project TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AND WEAK REAL-ESTATE MARKETS Submitted by Jonathan M. Cabral In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Public Policy Hartford, Connecticut Advisor: Professor Barry Feldman, Ph.D. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited by copyright law Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the support of many amazing people in my life. Many thanks to the Trinity College faculty that helped me along the way, most notably my project advisor, Professor Barry Feldman, who guided me through the research process and read countless drafts and revisions of this paper. I would also like to thank everyone who I interviewed for this project who took the time out of their busy schedules to help inform this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development Ctfastrak & Ctrail Hartford Line Corridors Ctfastrak Teacher’S Corner – 370 Asylum Street, Hartford
    Transit-Oriented Development CTfastrak & CTrail Hartford Line Corridors CTfastrak Teacher’s Corner – 370 Asylum Street, Hartford Union Station, Hartford – CTfastrak & CTrail 60 units (70%/30% market/affordable) $20.2 Million 36 Lewis Street Downtown Loop - CTfastrak 6 units (market rate) $1.8 Million Hartford Streetscape Improvements – Asylum, Main, Jewell, Ford, Gold and Pearl Streets Union Station/Downtown Loop, CTfastrak Pedestrian and Transit Street Improvements $10 Million Completed 2014 Downtown Loop – CTfastrak Upward Hartford Innovation Hub 27,000 sq ft - 20 Church Street Trinity Action Lab – 10 Constitution Plaza Downtown Loop, CTfastrak 21,000 sq ft Completed 2017 UCONN Downtown Hartford – 10 Prospect Street Downtown Loop, CTfastrak $140 Million Completed 2017 Capewell Lofts – 57 Charter Oak Avenue Downtown Loop, CTfastrak 72 Units (80/20 market/affordable) $27 Million Completed 2017 Noble Gas - 131 Buckingham Downtown Loop – CTfastrak 8 Units (market rate) Mixed Use (Gas Station, Convenience Store, Ice Cream) Anticipated Completion 2018 Dunkin Donuts Park – 1214 Main Street Union Station, Hartford – CTfastrak & CTrail $60 Million Completed 2017 Capitol Lofts – 390 Capitol Avenue Sigourney Station - CTfastrak 112 units (80%/20% market/affordable) $35.3 Million Completed 2017 The Hub on Park – 929-981 Park Street Parkville Station – CTfastrak 45 Units (mixed income) $16.2 Million Construction Beginning 2019 Hog River Brewing - 1429 Park Street Parkville Station, CTfastrak 3700 sq ft. Brewery & Tap Room (Food Trucks) Completed 2016 reSET 9,575 sq ft business incubator space Completed 2015 Hands On Hartford – 45/55 Bartholomew Avenue Parkville Station – CTfastrak Hands On Hartford Headquarters 30 Units (affordable) $11.97 Million New Park Brewing Company – 485 New Park Flatbush Station - CTfastrak 2500 sq ft Brewery (plus 400 sq ft Outdoor Patio) Food Trucks onsite when open (Thursday – Sunday) Completed 2017 Elmwood Station – CTfastrak 54 Units (mixed income) 616 New Park - 3,000 sq ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctfastrak: BRT and Autonomous Vehicle Buses – CRCOG
    CTfastrak: BRT and Autonomous Vehicle Buses Lyle Wray, Executive Director Capitol Region Council of Governments MAP Online Conference June 19, 2020 CTfastrak Brief Video • Concept started in the 1990s • Opened March 2015 • Ridership solid and growing (COVID-19 excepted) CTfastrak • Ridership rising in corridor for CTfastrak but Story falling in some other parts of the state • More than half of regional interstate congestion on I-84 west of downtown Hartford • Evaluation of highway expansion, rail and BRT • $567 million total cost The CTfastrak system provides a one-seat, no- transfer ride to many CTfastrak is Connecticut’s major regional CTfastrak routes are first Bus Rapid Transit employment, shopping, integrated with the system. It is a system of and healthcare CTtransit system, making it bus routes that utilize a destinations as well as easy to connect, transfer, bus-only guideway for all connections to rail service and pay your fare. or a portion of your trip. via the New Haven Line Waterbury Branch in Waterbury and the CTrail Hartford Line in Hartford. CTfastrak Routes 101 Hartford/New Britain 102 Hartford/New Britain/Bristol 121 MCC / Hartford / UConn Health 128 Hartford / Westfarms-New Britain 140 CCSU Connector 144 Wethersfield / Westfarms 153 Flatbush / Copaco 161 St. Francis Hospital / Hartford Hospital 923 Bristol Express 924 Southington-Cheshire Express 925 Cheshire - Waterbury Express 928 Southington-Cheshire-Waterbury Express • Expansion recommendations developed by CTfastrak Next CTDOT’s CTfastrak Expansion Study (2016)
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices for Engaging Anchor Institutions and Neighborhoods
    Capitol Region Council of Governments Building Corridors of Opportunity: Best Practices for Engaging Anchor Institutions and Neighborhoods Final Report December 1, 2016 Acknowledgements Building Corridors of Opportunity: Best Practices for Engaging Anchor Institutions and Neighborhoods, Final Report was prepared with financial support from the Hartford Foundation for Public Giving. The report was prepared for the Capitol Region Council of Governments by the consulting firm of HR&A Advisors, Inc. Building Corridors of Opportunity, Final Report 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary.........................................................05 Case Studies....................................................................19 Cleveland Healthline...............................................29 East Liberty Revitalization......................................42 Cortex Innovation Community................................52 Maryland TOD Initiative.........................................63 Urban Essex Coalition for Smart Growth............72 Emerald Express (EmX)...........................................82 Appendix..........................................................................90 Building Corridors of Opportunity, Final Report 3 Executive Summary CTfastrak is a bus rapid transit (BRT) service that began operation in 2015, running from downtown Hartford to downtown New Britain, Connecticut. • With a dedicated right-of-way, frequent service, pre-boarding payment system, and specially designed buses, it is one of the highest-rated systems
    [Show full text]
  • CTFASTRAK SYSTEM MAP Y WOODSIDE VILLAGE
    CTFASTRAK SYSTEM MAP y WOODSIDE VILLAGE Tunxis Mark 54 30 indsor Main W ROUTES: For more information, please visit www.cttransit.com. Hartford / New Britain via CTfastrak g 101 84 et tle I- FILLEY Cadwell FEDERATION ury THE HARTFORD onb 102 Hartford / New Britain / Bristol via CTfastrak Myr POND int tianuck wn HOME .W a UConn Health / Hartford / MCC via CTfastrak o PLAZA W E Express Bus service to/from downtown 121 r ALEXANDRIA ry intonbur M CTtransit/Hartford Hartford / Westfarms via CTfastrak / New Britain via Stanley St B onbu y Nutme 128 MANOR Wint Hartford from this Park & Ride Lot provided by Co Garde METRO CENTER 52 36 to gswell Spring LINCOLN FINANCIAL the 903-MANCHESTER-BUCKLAND EXPRESS. 923 Churc I-84 Manchester Mountain CLEAR EDGE Bradley Flyer Locust Street 923 Bristol Express via CTfastrak n h Connections to HILTON HOTEL 32 Newber 924 Cheshire / Southington Express via CTfastrak 924 ook Amtrak BLOOMFIELD indbr SOUTH WINDSOR Park Street–New Park Avenue Farmington Avenue Waterbury Express via CTfastrak HARTFORD STAGE 121 ome W WINDSOR ry 925 UNION STATION SAV-MOR Blue Seymour Asylum 925 r P chool Rood COMMUNITY HALL Chu Talcott ar S Ford SHOPPING 928 Waterbury / Cheshire / Southington Express via CTfastrak Allyn rch Je BLOOMFIELD k PLAZA Windsor Avenue Broad Street 928 U h PRUDENTIAL CAPITAL COMM. CENTER Uccello XL CENTER Hills Midian UnionU TOWN HALL ROCKWELL Hig H COLLEGE mbus Pa lu r rumbull t 74 k HHOMEWOOD SUITES Ann T Park Street–Park Road Farmington Avenue–North Main Street CONSTITUTION c LP WILSON Co Farmington Farmington HARTFORD 21 RESIDENCE INN PLAZA Rockwell CORNER 36 WOOD MEMORIAL Asylum Pratt yler COMMUNITY Broad 101 LIBRARY Windsor Avenue–International Drive Hillside Avenue 102 T CENTER rospe e e 34 Fo UCONN Cottage Grov 50 rov Market STATE P 128 153 E.
    [Show full text]
  • State Owned and Maintained Functionally Obsolete Bridges
    State Owned and Maintained Functionally Obsolete Bridges (4,016 bridges - includes NHS, Non-NHS, NBI, and Non-NBI) Most Travelled (sorted by ADT) Data is based on the condition data of our entire bridge inventory (both NBI and Non-NBI bridges) at the time of the 2018 NBI submittal to FHWA on 03/15/18, which included inspection condition data due in 2017 and the most recent inspection condition data at the time of the submittal NBI 112: NBIS Bridge Length NBI 29: Average Daily NBI 27: Year Built NBI 7: Facility Carried by NBI 6A: Feature Intersected: Narrative NBI 4: City or Town NBI 104: Highway System of the Inventory [Classification Traffic (ADT) [General [General Bridge No. Bridge Name Structure [Classification] [Classification] [Classification] Route [Classification] ] Information] Information] 1 00105A INTERSTATE-95 METRO NORTH & CITY ST'S 08070 - BRIDGEPORT 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 161300 1999 2 00164 INTERSTATE-95 ROUTE 10 52070 - NEW HAVEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 152800 1957 3 00038 INTERSTATE-95 HAMILTON AVENUE 73070 - STAMFORD 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 149600 1958 4 00014 INTERSTATE-95 METRO NORTH RR & STATION 33620 - GREENWICH 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 146000 1958 5 00045 INTERSTATE-95 ROUTE 136 18850 - DARIEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 144100 1952 6 00033 INTERSTATE-95 MAPLE AVENUE 73070 - STAMFORD 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 143900 1958 7 00011 INTERSTATE-95 DAVIS AVENUE 33620 - GREENWICH 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 143800 1958 8 00027 INTERSTATE-95 SSR 493(WASHINGTON
    [Show full text]
  • Norton-Ctfastrak Precast Pavement
    Connecticut PCP Bus Pad Replacement Project Steve Norton Presentation Overview • Need for Rapid Pavement Repair Solutions • Project Selection • Project Details and Fabrication • Construction Sequence • Panel Installation • Lessons Learned / Future Plans Need for Precast Concrete Pavement • Numerous high volume roads with composite pavement in Connecticut • Many JRCP roads built in the 50s and 60s falling into a major rehab category • Need a rapid joint repair strategy for high volume areas with limited work hours • Need long lasting repairs (get in, get out, stay out) Project Selection CTfastrak Bituminous Bus Pad ▫ High profile project – first bus rapid transit system in CT ▫ Busway opened in Spring 2015 ▫ Directly connects Hartford to New Britain ▫ Operates almost around the clock Project Selection (cont.) • Severe rutting at New Britain East Main Street station within 6 months Project Selection (cont.) • Rutting caused bus doors to become inoperable • Discussions began for temporary and permanent repair strategies Project Selection (cont.) • Emergency bituminous paving performed as temporary fix • CT applied for and received $75,000 in SHRP2 user incentive funds • CT also received $150,000 as lead adopter • Funds used to develop permanent PCP repair and advance the technology Project Details • Typical Panel Dimensions: 9’ long, 15’ wide, 10” thick • Total length of each bus pad: 106’ • Included use of Gracie Level Lifts - 4 per panel • 14” long dowel bars, 1.25” diameter, spaced at 1’ apart • Bottom dowel slots • Undersealing grout distribution channels • Foam gasket lining for grout containment • Epoxy Coated Steel Reinforcement Project Details • Dowel slot grout: ▫ 4,000 psi at 28 days (2,500 psi before opening to traffic), rapid non-shrink • Bedding grout: ▫ 4,000 psi at 28 days (500 psi before opening to traffic), rapid set and free flowing, capable of 1,400 psi at 25 minutes • Concrete: ▫ 5,000 psi at 28 days Panel Layout Project Cross Sections Precast Pavement Fabrication Fort Miller Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Conditions Assessment
    FARMINGTON CANAL HERITAGE TRAIL & CTfastrak GAP CLOSURE EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT Gap Closure Trail Study Plainville, New Britain, and Southington, Connecticut PREPARED FOR Capitol Region Council of Governments 214 Main Street Hartford, CT 06106 860.522.2217 PREPARED BY 100 Great Meadow Road Suite 200 Wethersfield, CT 06109 860.807.4300 OCTOBER 2017 Farmington Canal Heritage Trail & CTfastrak Gap Closure Trail Study | EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Table of Contents 1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Project Vision and Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 Vision Statement ......................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1-5 Farmington Canal
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit Assessment Route 8 & Waterbury Branch Line Corridor
    CDM Smith Planning4Places Harriman Zuvic and Carr Bus Rapid Transit Assessment Route 8 & Waterbury Branch Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development & Alternate Transit Modes Assessment Project April 2019 BRT Alternatives TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ i BRT Alternatives ............................................................................................................................................................. i BRT Elements ................................................................................................................................................................ ii 1. Elements of BRT ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Running Ways.......................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Stations ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Vehicles ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Fare Collection .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]