DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydraulic and Geomorphic Assessment of the Merced River and Historic Bridges in Eastern Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydraulic and Geomorphic Assessment of the Merced River and Historic Bridges in Eastern Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California Hydraulic and Geomorphic Assessment of the Merced River and Historic Bridges in Eastern Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California Open-File Report 2013–1016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Hydraulic and Geomorphic Assessment of the Merced River and Historic Bridges in Eastern Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California By J. Toby Minear and Scott A. Wright Open-File Report 2013–1016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 Revised and reprinted: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Minear, J.Toby, Wright, Scott A., 2013, Hydraulic and Geomorphic Assessment of the Merced River and Historic Bridges in Eastern Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California: Sacramento, California, United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2013-1016, 74 p. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. iii Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Scope ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Site Description ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Scenario development ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Present-day topography ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Hydrologic data ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Water-surface elevations ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Wood influences on stage data .......................................................................................................................... 11 Present-day surface grain-size data ...................................................................................................................... 11 FaSTMECH 2D hydrodynamic model ........................................................................................................................ 12 Development of the present-day topographic surface model ................................................................................. 12 Surface generation ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Development of scenario topography .................................................................................................................... 14 Development of historical surface .......................................................................................................................... 14 Mesh configuration ................................................................................................................................................. 15 Roughness ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Boundary conditions .............................................................................................................................................. 20 FaSTMECH solution parameters ........................................................................................................................... 20 FaSTMECH model evaluation................................................................................................................................ 21 Test of FaSTMECH mesh configuration ................................................................................................................ 22 Uncertainty and limitations of the hydraulic modeling ............................................................................................ 22 Geomorphic assessment ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Results .......................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Results of FaSTMECH hydrodynamic model ............................................................................................................ 25 Results of geomorphic assessment ........................................................................................................................... 27 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 References cited ........................................................................................................................................................... 31 iv Figures Figure 1. Overview map of the watersheds of eastern Yosemite Valley and the project site. .................................. 34 Figure 2. Photograph of ground-based LiDAR unit on river left streambank approximately 100 m downstream of Ahwahnee Bridge at site of the previous Lower Pines Campground.. .......................................................................... 35 Figure 3. Map of bridge locations in eastern Yosemite Valley.. ................................................................................ 36 Figure 4. Longitudinal profile of the Merced River through Yosemite Valley (modified from Eagan 1998)............... 37 Figure 5. Digital elevation model of the Merced River study reach, with evaluation cross-sections marked. ........... 38 Figure 6. Comparison of flow data for the historical gage on Tenaya Creek (USGS gage 11265000) and Merced River at Happy Isles (USGS gage 11264500).. ............................................................................................................. 39 Figure 7. Photograph of flow through river right equestrian tunnel at Clark’s Bridge, taken looking upstream. Figures 13 and 14 show the main bridge spans for Clark’s and Ahwahnee Bridges..................................................... 40 Figure 8. Map of Merced River in eastern Yosemite Valley, showing the locations of study cross-sections established by the YNP as part of an ongoing streambank monitoring program. ......................................................... 41 Figure 9. Photograph of the side channel and the ground-based LiDAR unit, Maptek I-Site 4400, looking upstream into the side channel between Sugar Pine and Ahwahnee Bridges. ............................................................................. 42 Figure 10. Map of the project site on the Merced River in eastern Yosemite Valley.. ............................................ 43 Figure 11. Stage-discharge relation developed by YNP for Tenaya Creek from discharge measurements collected by Balance Hydrologics in WY2006 and YNP in WY2009-2010. .................................................................................. 44 Figure 12. Flood probability plotted for the Merced River, using peak discharge data collected at the USGS Merced River at Happy Isles gage, 11264500.. ............................................................................................................ 45 Figure 13. Photograph of a “tape-down” measurement of river stage during WY2010 on the downstream side of Clark’s Bridge.. .............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yosemite National Park U.S
    National Park Service Yosemite National Park U.S. Department of the Interior The Ahwahnee Comprehensive Rehabilitation Plan Where is The Ahwahnee is located in Yosemite Valley in Yosemite National Park. The Ahwahnee area the project includes a National Historic Landmark hotel, as well as guest cottages, an employee dormitory, and located? associated grounds and landscaping. Built in 1927, The Ahwahnee hotel is an iconic landmark and is used year-round by both overnight and day visitors to Yosemite Valley. After more than 80 years in service, the hotel and associated structures are in need of rehabilitation because: Why Facilities at The Ahwahnee are not fully compliant with the most recent building and undertake this planning accessibility codes, including: International Building Code (IBC) effort? National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Code Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and IBC seismic requirements; and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. Many of the electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems serving The Ahwahnee facilities are aging and need to be replaced and updated. Some historic hotel finishes and landscape components are time-worn or have been altered over the years, potentially affecting the historic integrity of this property. The current operational layout of some working areas reduces the efficiency of providing a high level of visitor services. The purpose of this project is to develop a comprehensive plan for phased, long-term rehabilitation of The Ahwahnee National Historic Landmark hotel and associated guest cottages, employee dormitory, What does and landscaped grounds in order to: this plan propose? Restore, preserve, and protect the historic integrity and character-defining features of The Ahwahnee by rehabilitating aged or altered historic finishes and contributing landscape features.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Guide Yosemite
    Yosemite Guide Yosemite Where to Go and What to Do in Yosemite National Park July 29, 2015 - September 1, 2015 1, September - 2015 29, July Park National Yosemite in Do to What and Go to Where NPS Photo NPS 1904. Grove, Mariposa Monarch, Fallen the astride Soldiers” “Buffalo Cavalry 9th D, Troop Volume 40, Issue 6 Issue 40, Volume America Your Experience Yosemite, CA 95389 Yosemite, 577 PO Box Service Park National US DepartmentInterior of the Year-round Route: Valley Yosemite Valley Shuttle Valley Visitor Center Upper Summer-only Routes: Yosemite Shuttle System El Capitan Fall Yosemite Shuttle Village Express Lower Shuttle Yosemite The Ansel Fall Adams l Medical Church Bowl i Gallery ra Clinic Picnic Area l T al Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System F e E1 5 P2 t i 4 m e 9 Campground os Mirror r Y 3 Uppe 6 10 2 Lake Parking Village Day-use Parking seasonal The Ahwahnee Half Dome Picnic Area 11 P1 1 8836 ft North 2693 m Camp 4 Yosemite E2 Housekeeping Pines Restroom 8 Lodge Lower 7 Chapel Camp Lodge Day-use Parking Pines Walk-In (Open May 22, 2015) Campground LeConte 18 Memorial 12 21 19 Lodge 17 13a 20 14 Swinging Campground Bridge Recreation 13b Reservations Rentals Curry 15 Village Upper Sentinel Village Day-use Parking Pines Beach E7 il Trailhead a r r T te Parking e n il i w M in r u d 16 o e Nature Center El Capitan F s lo c at Happy Isles Picnic Area Glacier Point E3 no shuttle service closed in winter Vernal 72I4 ft Fall 2I99 m l E4 Mist Trai Cathedral ail Tr op h Beach Lo or M ey ses erce all only d R V iver E6 Nevada To & Fall The Valley Visitor Shuttle operates from 7 am to 10 pm and serves stops in numerical order.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness-Use.Pdf
    Trailhead Quota System Acquiring A Wilderness Permit Acquiring A Wilderness Permit Continued Welcome! Yosemite is a popular destination for backpackers, By reservation. Advance reservations are available From May through October, you can get permits at and it includes over 700 miles of trail and 54 for trips occurring from May through October. the following locations: The greater the obstacle, • Yosemite Valley Wilderness Center in Yosemite Most of Yosemite National Park is trailheads. Yosemite National Park has a trailhead Reservations are available up to 24 weeks (168 days), the more glory quota system limiting the number of overnight but no later than two days, before your start date. Village next to the Post Office in overcoming it. designated Wilderness—designated by • Tuolumne Meadows Wilderness Center, one mile visitors entering a particular trailhead on a given Jean Baptiste Molière Congress because the American people To reserve a permit, download a reservation form east of the Tuolumne Store, off Tioga Road wanted areas where nature and its day. This system is designed to reduce impacts from www.nps.gov/yose/planyourvisit/wild and to avoid overcrowding, in keeping with the • Big Oak Flat Information Station, immediately community of life remain unchanged by permits.htm, completely fill out the form, and Wilderness Act’s mandate of providing after the 120 West park entrance humans. You will experience nature on its fax to 209/372-0739. You may also call “outstanding opportunities for solitude.” The • The Wawona Visitor Center at Hill’s Studio own terms in Yosemite’s wilderness– 209/372-0740 or write to Wilderness Permits; quota system is based on where you begin your • Hetch Hetchy Entrance Station natural fires, falling rocks, high water stream PO Box 545; Yosemite, CA, 95389.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Valley Hiking Map U.S
    Yosemite National Park National Park Service Yosemite Valley Hiking Map U.S. Department of the Interior To To ) S k Tioga n Tioga m e To o e k w r Road 10 Shuttle Route / Stop Road 7 Tioga . C Ranger Station C 4 n 3.I mi (year round) 6.9 mi ( Road r e i o 5.0 km y I e II.I km . 3.6 mi m n 6 k To a 9 m 5.9 km 18 Shuttle Route / Stop . C Self-guiding Nature Trail Tioga North 0 2 i Y n ( . o (summer only) 6 a Road 2 i s . d 6 m e 5.0 mi n m k i I Trailhead Parking ( 8.0 km m Bicycle / Foot Path I. it I.3 0 e ) k C m (paved) m re i ( e 2 ) ) k . Snow I Walk-in Campground m k k m Creek Hiking Trail .2 k ) Falls 3 Upper e ( e Campground i r Waterfall C Yosemite m ) 0 Fall Yosemite h I Kilometer . c r m 2 Point A k Store l 8 6936 ft . a ) y 0 2II4 m ( m I Mile o k i R 9 I. m ( 3. i 2 5 m . To Tamarack Flat North m i Yosemite Village 0 Lower (5 .2 Campground . I I Dome 2.5 mi Yosemite k Visitor Center m 7525 ft 0 Fall 3.9 km ) 2294 m . 3 k m e Cre i 2.0 mi Lower Yosemite Fall Trail a (3 To Tamarack Flat ( Medical Royal Mirror .2 0 y The Ahwahnee a m) k .
    [Show full text]
  • Tuolumne Planning Workbook
    National Park Service Yosemite National Park U.S. Department of the Interior Tuolumne Planning Workbook Report on Progress from Fall 2007 to Present Tuolumne River Plan July 2008 Message from the Superintendent The Purpose of this National Park Service U.S. Dept. of the Interior Dear Friends of the Tuolumne River, and how they might be translated into site plans for Tuolumne Meadows. Planning Workbook Much has happened in the past year, since we asked for your comments in For this workbook the planning team has drafted four prelimi- WHEN THE PLANNING FOR THE TUOLUMNE RIVER BEGAN IN 2005, THE the 2007 Tuolumne Planning Workbook. nary site plan concepts for Tuolumne Meadows —one for each National Park Service knew that it would be a complex, multiyear eff ort. The plan- Yosemite National Park The most recent event was the Ninth of the four original management zoning alternatives. These con- ning team was determined not to let a summer season go by without presenting a Circuit Court of Appeals ruling regard- cepts explore how functions and facilities might be organized detailed update on the plan’s progress to the culturally associated Indian tribes, For more information about the ing the Merced River Plan, which is another comprehensive and sited at Tuolumne Meadows to help carry out the intents of interested members of the public, and other stakeholders—and to provide oppor- Tuolumne River Plan, contact the plan for a wild and scenic river that the park staff is conducting the management zoning alternatives. While the planning team tunities for their input along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite National Park Foundation Overview
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Yosemite National Park California Contact Information For more information about Yosemite National Park, Call (209) 372-0200 (then dial 3 then 5) or write to: Public Information Office, P.O. Box 577, Yosemite, CA 95389 Park Description Through a rich history of conservation, the spectacular The geology of the Yosemite area is characterized by granitic natural and cultural features of Yosemite National Park rocks and remnants of older rock. About 10 million years have been protected over time. The conservation ethics and ago, the Sierra Nevada was uplifted and then tilted to form its policies rooted at Yosemite National Park were central to the relatively gentle western slopes and the more dramatic eastern development of the national park idea. First, Galen Clark and slopes. The uplift increased the steepness of stream and river others lobbied to protect Yosemite Valley from development, beds, resulting in formation of deep, narrow canyons. About ultimately leading to President Abraham Lincoln’s signing 1 million years ago, snow and ice accumulated, forming glaciers the Yosemite Grant in 1864. The Yosemite Grant granted the at the high elevations that moved down the river valleys. Ice Yosemite Valley and Mariposa Grove of Big Trees to the State thickness in Yosemite Valley may have reached 4,000 feet during of California stipulating that these lands “be held for public the early glacial episode. The downslope movement of the ice use, resort, and recreation… inalienable for all time.” Later, masses cut and sculpted the U-shaped valley that attracts so John Muir led a successful movement to establish a larger many visitors to its scenic vistas today.
    [Show full text]
  • John Muir Trail Entry Points
    John Muir Trail Entry Points Alphabetical list of Inyo National Forest trails that connect to John Muir Trail (JMT) Mileage and elevation are approximate for trip planning, not intended for navigation. * indicates there is no pass between entry point and JMT junction Elevation Miles to Trail Name (area) Elevation at TrailheadElevation of Pass at JMT JunctionMiles to Pass JMT Junction Baxter Pass (Independence) 6,000 ft. 12,270 ft. 10,200 ft. 8 13 Bishop Pass (South Lake/ Bishop) 9,800 ft. 11,960 ft. 8,700 ft. 5 10 Cottonwood Pass -PCT (Horseshoe 9,900 ft. 11,120 ft. 10,600 ft. 3.5 20.5 Meadow) Duck Pass (Mammoth Lakes) 9,100 ft. 10,795 ft. 10,200 ft. 6 7 High Trail (Agnew Meadows) 8,300 ft. * 9,850 ft. * 7.75 JMT North of Devils Postpile (Reds 7,560 ft. * 7,580 ft. * Meadow toward Yosemite) 0.25 JMT South of Devils Postpile (Reds 7,560 ft. * 7,580 ft. * Meadow toward Mt Whitney) 0.25 Kearsarge Pass (Independence) 9,100 ft. 11,800 ft. 10,500 ft. 4 6.5 McGee Pass (Crowley Lake) 8,000 ft. 11,875 ft. 9,500 ft. 7 11.5 Mono Pass (Rock Creek Road) 10,200 ft. 12,040 ft. 8,400 ft. 2.5 15 Mt Whitney Trail (Lone Pine) 8,300 ft. 13,700 ft. 13,480 ft. 8.2 8.7 Pine Creek Pass (Bishop) 7,400 ft. 11,120 ft. 8,075 ft. 7 20 Piute Pass (North Lake/ Bishop) 9,350 ft. 11,420 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite National Park U.S
    National Park Service Yosemite National Park U.S. Department of the Interior Merced Wild & Scenic River Final Comprehensive Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Designated in 1987, the The Merced Wild and Scenic River Merced Wild and Scenic River Final Comprehensive Merced Wild and Scenic River includes 81 miles The Merced Wild and Scenic River, designated in Management Plan and Environmental Impact State- in Yosemite National 1987, includes 122 miles of the Merced River on the ment (Final Merced River Plan/EIS) is the National Park and the El Portal Park Service’s response to these requirements. Administrative Site. western side of the Sierra Nevada in California. The National Park Service (NPS) manages 81 miles of the Merced Wild and Scenic River through Yosem- The Final Merced River Plan/EIS will be the guid- ite National Park and the El Portal Administrative ing document for protecting and enhancing river Site, including the headwaters and both the Mer- values and managing use and user capacity within ced River’s main stem and the South Fork Merced the Merced River corridor for the next 20 years. As River. As the Merced River flows outside Yosemite’s such, it evaluates impacts and threats to river values western boundary, the U.S. Forest Service and the and identifies strategies for protecting and enhanc- Bureau of Land Management manage the next 41 ing these values over the long-term. The plan fol- miles of the Merced Wild and Scenic River. lows and documents planning processes required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Why a Comprehensive Management Plan? the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) requires and other legal mandates governing National Park comprehensive planning for all designated rivers to Service decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins Climate Impact Assessment
    Technical Appendix Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins Climate Impact Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation October 2014 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Technical Appendix Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins Climate Impact Assessment Prepared for Reclamation by CH2M HILL under Contract No. R12PD80946 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Michael K. Tansey, PhD, Mid-Pacific Region Climate Change Coordinator Arlan Nickel, Mid-Pacific Region Basin Studies Coordinator By CH2M HILL Brian Van Lienden, PE, Water Resources Engineer Armin Munévar, PE, Water Resources Engineer Tapash Das, PhD, Water Resources Engineer U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation October 2014 This page left intentionally blank Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................... xvii Preface ......................................................................................................... xxi 1.0 Technical Approach .............................................................................. 1 2.0 Socioeconomic-Climate Future
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of the Mariposa Grove of Giant Sequoias Final
    Chapter 5: Bibliography CHAPTER 5: BIBLIOGRAPHY Anderson, M. Kat. 1993. Indian Fire­Based Management in the Sequoia Mixed Conifer Forests of the Central and Southern Sierra Nevada. Final Report to USDI National Park Service, Yosemite Research Center, Yosemite National Park, California. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. 2009. Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas. Available online at: http://www.access­board.gov. Bane, B. 2012. Archeological Inventory for the Mariposa Grove Restoration Plan, Yosemite National Park, California. Division of Resources Management and Science, Yosemite National Park, California. Barrett, Samuel, and Edward Gifford. 1933. Miwok Material Culture: Indian Life of the Yosemite Region. Yosemite Association, Yosemite National Park, California. Bennyhoff, J.A. 1956. An Appraisal of the Archeological Resources of Yosemite National Park. University of California Archeological Survey Reports 34:1­71. Berkeley, California. Borchers, J.W. 1996. Ground­Water Resources and Water­Supply Alternatives in the Wawona Area of Yosemite National Park, California Water­Resources Investigation Report 95­4229. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Brace, C.L. 1869. The Digger Indians. In The New West: or California in 1867­1868, pp. 137­152. G.P. Putnam and Son, New York, New York. Bunnell, Lafayette Houghton. 1859. How the Yo­Semite Valley was Discovered and Named. Hutchings’ California Magazine 35(May):498­504. Bunnell, Lafayette Houghton. 1990. Discovery of the Yosemite, and the Indian War of 1851, Which Led to the Event. Yosemite Association, Yosemite National Park, California. Buskirk, S.W., and R.A. Powell, 1994. Habitat ecology of American martens and fishers. In S.W. Buskirk, A.S. Harestad, M.G.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDY of INCREASING CONVEY CAPACITY of MERCED RIVER at the CONFLUENCE with SAN JOAQUIN RIVER a Project Presented to the Faculty
    STUDY OF INCREASING CONVEY CAPACITY OF MERCED RIVER AT THE CONFLUENCE WITH SAN JOAQUIN RIVER A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of Civil Engineering California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Civil Engineering (Water Resources Engineering) by Hani Nour SUMMER 2017 © 2017 Hani Nour ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii STUDY OF INCREASING CONVEY CAPACITY OF MERCED RIVER AT THE CONFLUENCE WITH SAN JOAQUIN RIVER A Project by Hani Nour Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Saad Merayyan __________________________________, Second Reader Dr. Cristina Poindexter, P.E. ___________________________ Date iii Student: Hani Nour I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. _________________________, Department Chair ______________ Dr. Benjamin Fell, P.E. Date Department of Civil Engineering iv Abstract of STUDY OF INCREASING CONVEY CAPACITY OF MERCED RIVER AT THE CONFLUNENCE WITH SAN JOAQUIN RIVER by Hani Nour Flooding in California’s Central Valley is very common and expected to occur every year anywhere throughout the region. The climate and geography of the Central Valley, together, are responsible for over flow streams, rivers, and lakes causing water flooding, particularly at the lower elevation areas. San Joaquin Basin is located between the Sierra Nevada (on the east) and the Coast Ranges (on the west) where flooding is typically characterized by infrequent severe storms during winter season due to heavy rain and snow- melt runoff coming from the foothills, east of Merced County (Jesse Patchett 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Valley Visitor Center
    k e k e e r e C r Upper C n Yosemite o h y c r Fall n k A a e C e l r Yosemite Point a n C 6936ft y a Lower o 2114m i North Dome e d R t 7525ft i Yosemite n I 2294m m Fall e s ek o re Y U.S. Yosemite Valley Visitor Center C ya Court a Wilderness Center n e Museum Royal Arch T Lower Yosemite Medical Clinic Cascade Fall Trail Washington Columbia YOSEMITE Column Mirror Rock VILLAGE ROYAL Eagle Lake T ARCHES 4094ft Peak H 1248m 7779ft R The Ahwahnee Half Dome 2371m Sentinel Visitor E 8836ft Bridge Parking E North 2693m B Housekeeping Pines Camp 4 R Yosemite Camp Lower O Lodge Pines Chapel Stoneman T Bridge Middle H LeConte Brother E Memorial Road open ONLY to R Lodge pedestrians, bicycles, Ribbon S Visitor Parking and vehicles with Fall Swinging Bridge Curry Village Upper wheelchair emblem Pines Lower placards Sentinel Little Yosemite Valley El Capitan Brother Beach Trailhead for Moran 7569ft Four Mile Trail (summer only) R Point Staircase Mt Broderick i 2307m Trailhead 6706ft 6100 ft b Falls Horse Tail Parking 1859m b 2044m o Fall Trailhead for Vernal n Fall, Nevada Fall, and Glacier Point El Capitan Vernal C 7214 ft Nature Center John Muir Trail r S e e 2199 m at Happy Isles Fall Liberty Cap e n r k t 5044ft 7076ft ve i 4035ft Grizzly Emerald Ri n rced e 1230m 1538m 2157m Me l Peak Pool Silver C Northside Drive ive re Sentinel Apron Dr e North one-way Cathedral k El Capitan e Falls 0 0.5 Kilometer id To Tioga Road, Tuolumne Meadows Bridge Beach hs y ed R ut a y J and Hwy 120; and Hetch Hetchy Merc iv So -w horse trail onl o 0 0.5 Mile er
    [Show full text]