DOCSLIB.ORG

Australia in the "Asian Century" Or Is It Lost in Asia? Australia Maintains a Delusion of Reality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Australia in the Australia in the "Asian Century" or is it Lost in Asia? Australia maintains a delusion of reality China and the US - The Australian dilemma. Murray Hunter The Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard released a long awaited white paper Australia in the Asian Century yesterday, which has been "wowed" by the Australian media. The white paper basically affirms that Australia's future lies with Asia and consequently immense economic opportunities exist for Australia to grab. The paper hinges the nation's strategy of becoming a competitive force within the region through skills development, innovation, infrastructure, the tax system, regulatory reform, and environmental sustainability. However before a nation can become a competitive force, it must have an accepted place in the region. On this key strategy the White paper does little more than make a "rally call" to Australians to come out and make it happen. The paper also reeks of Austro-centrism where most of the points made in the document are written with the expectation that Australia will win out of closer ties with Asia without necessarily giving much back in exchange - such as Australia having closer ties with Asian universities in order to attract students and skilled workers. Rather one-way to say the least. The Australian China US relationships Not surprisingly, the document still goes out to reaffirm Australia's loyalty to the United States. This could be seen as Premier Julia Gillard's metaphoric statement of "all the way with LBJ". Historically the US is seen as a savior from invasion by the Japanese during WWII and consequently there has been a total commitment from successive Australian governments through the cold war until the present time for US foreign policy. The ANZUS Treaty that embodied these commitments has brought many foreign policy mistakes to Australia and probably cost Australia in South-East Asia its own persona of identity. In addition, although Australia could be considered a rich multicultural society today, some people in Asia still have a negative impression because of the old white Australia policy, treatment of indigenous people, Pauline Hansen, and the latest policies on boat arrivals of asylum seekers. In contrast, China is now so important to Australian trade, investment, and tourism, yet Australia is unconsciously niggling China with its staunch loyalty to the US. China saved Australia from a deep recession with demand for minerals whereas the US brought the Australian Government anguish over the involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition, it appears the US had a different rule to Australia than other allies. The Australian Government has been expected to follow US foreign policy in an unquestionable manner. Each Australian Prime Minister since Curtin has kowtowed to the US, seeking a close presidential relationship in the belief that this was in the best domestic and foreign interests. Certainly a close personal relationship with the incumbent US president has been seen as something of importance. Conversely, Kevin Rudd's prowess at speaking Chinese was not good enough to develop the relationship with China, as the relationship is much more complex than mere small talk. China would prefer to deal with an Australia with a mature and independent foreign policy rather than an enthusiastic supporter of US foreign policy. Precedent shows that China does not necessarily expect blind allegiance but would like to see Australian decisions more in line with its own realities rather than someone else's. However looking today at both major parties in Australian politics this is highly unlikely. In addition the punishment dished out by the US Government to the David Lange Government in New Zealand in the mid 1980s is a deep lesson about what happens to those disobedient to the US. From the US perspective, Australia is a nice ally to have, one it can rely upon on the international stage, which will be important as Australia takes up a temporary security council seat at the UN. With the Obama visit to Canberra and Darwin last year and the stationing of troops in Australia, the country has some importance to the US until it can establish much more substantial bases closer to China. China as an ally presents less of a dilemma than the US, as China has historically always allowed some deviation from the official Chinese foreign policy. For example China does allow Australia and other nations to have a separate relationship with Taiwan, and different approaches to regional issues without making these differences major issues. Maybe Australia can learn from the Indonesian approach of dynamic equilibrium, a doctrine where Washington and Beijing would agree to co-exist rather than compete for supremacy in the region. Australia is also finding it difficult to accept that there are other views in the world other than the occidental position on detente and human rights that it expects within the region. For example, many Australians cannot understand why so many Chinese people so strongly support the position of the Chinese Government on many issues like Tibet, and how people can accept a communist system. Australia's relationship with the Asian Region After decades of successive government foreign and trade policy, Australia still does not have any embedded position within the Asian region. In fact Australia has been historically viewed as occasionally condescending and arrogant towards the region with attitudes towards human rights, where Australia's own practices in matters like the detention of boat people are seen by some as hypocritical. The influence of Australian business and financial institutions in the region is minor, nowhere near the critical mass needed to become a competitive force in the region. Australia at this time has only a very low profile in the Asian banking and finance sector with no brands out there. The only exception is in the mining sector, which to all intents and purposes has made the Australian economy very dependent upon demand in Asia, particularly China. Back in the 1990s the then Prime Minister Paul Keating stated that Australia is part of Asia and together with the then foreign minister Gareth Evans made a concerted effort to embed Australia within the region. This had some positive effect with Indonesia, Cambodia, Laos, and East Timor with Australian policy working towards enhancing peace and prosperity within the region. But they had their setbacks over the recalcitrant remarks about Malaysia's former Premier Mahathir Mohamed which soured relations with that country for a number of years. However perceptively, all these gains were lost when John Howard came to power in 1996 reaffirming the Canberra-Washington link, earning the label for Australia as the US's deputy sheriff in the Asia. The Australian relationship with the region is one where Australia needs the region more than the region needs Australia. The Australian market is small compared to other markets and of little interest to regional exporters who prefer to put their efforts into the larger markets of China, Japan, EU, and the US. Other hubs in the region are more conducive to becoming corporate HQ hubs than Sydney or Melbourne. The only real interest Australia has for Asian investors been in rent seeking activities like real estate. Australia is the gateway to nowhere, so cannot play the role as a hub like Singapore and Hong Kong have successfully done. However the concept of Darwin as a gateway to Asia has been formally recognized but it remains to be seen what will actually be done about it. With the rapidly changing nature of the region and the shifting balance between the US and China within Asia, the Austro-centric view of the region needs urgent revamping. The Australian economy in the short and medium term is dependent upon China, and Australia perceives itself rightly or wrongly to be dependent upon the US for security. Australia's acceptance of the wide array of Asian views within the region that Australia can one day become an equal partner in the region. Though Australia has some deeply historical links with many parts of the region due to some heroic actions of troops during the Second World War and the Malayan Emergency after that, tragically these opportunities to further develop relationships were not capitalized upon, due to Australian mesmerization with Washington. White papers aside, it will be action and not words that are important and China and the region will be surprised to see any real change, although the intention and realization of the need is present within the foreign policy Australian agenda. However with Australia, old habits die hard. And just as Julia Gillard had an unfortunate fall the other week in India in front of the media, Australia also has a track record of falling over itself in Asia. It will take much more than a massive investment in skills and education to be able to engage the Asian region, let alone be "competitive". One of the paramount barriers Australia has to overcome is the deep set belief that its own cultural values are not necessarily universally accepted across the region. It's not about learning Asian languages but about understanding different points of view, approaches, and 'mindsets'. Austro-centrism must take a back seat in relationships around the region for Australia to be seriously considered a member of the region. Currently it's not. The white paper is still haunted by Australia's past. Maybe it's time for Australia to release the US security blanket a little and become a mature and independent nation within the Asian region. However one fears with the promise of a rise in real incomes from the "Asian Century" initiative, that the whole thing is just a pander to the domestic electorate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Juila Gillard, 45, Says the Problem for Women in Politics Is That There Is Not a Set Image of What a Woman Leader Should Look Like
    Juila Gillard, 45, says the problem for women in politics is that there is not a set image of what a woman leader should look like. Men, she says, simply get better-quality suits, shirts and ties. ‘Women have so many more options it’s easier to criticise,’ she says. ‘You have to take it with a grain of salt and a fair bit of good humour.’ in profi le JULIA GILLARD From hostel to HISTORY She’s one of our most senior female politicians and one day she could have the top job. But what’s she really like? JULIE McCROSSIN meets Julia Gillard f you want to get to know Julia Gillard There is no sign of that clipped, robotic the White House, where people rarely sleep and understand what drives her political voice that often appears in her sound-bites or go home, has a lot in common with her Ipassions, you have to know the story of on the news. If she gets the chance to talk a life in parliament. her Welsh immigrant family, especially that of bit longer, as she does these days in the chatty There’s not much spare space in her offi ce, her father, John. world of breakfast television with her regular meeting room and en-suite bathroom. The It’s been a long journey from the appearances on Nine’s Today show debating window offers a glimpse of a courtyard Pennington Migrant Hostel in Adelaide, the Liberal Party’s heavyweight Tony Abbott, with trees. Aboriginal art by Maggie Long where Gillard arrived in 1966 at age four with you hear a more natural voice.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard
    This is a repository copy of Comparing the dynamics of party leadership survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82697/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Heppell, T and Bennister, M (2015) Comparing the dynamics of party leadership survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard. Government and Opposition, FirstV. 1 - 26. ISSN 1477-7053 https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.31 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Comparing the Dynamics of Party Leadership Survival in Britain and Australia: Brown, Rudd and Gillard Abstract This article examines the interaction between the respective party structures of the Australian Labor Party and the British Labour Party as a means of assessing the strategic options facing aspiring challengers for the party leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. the Labor Party Campaign and Aftermath
    12. The Labor Party Campaign and Aftermath George Wright Disunity versus discipline Labor did not so much lose the election as lose government. In Australian football terms, we had put the Liberals 10 goals ahead when the year started. Labor’s defeat in 2013 had been determined years earlier as we persisted with a jaw-dropping lack of unity and seemingly endless infighting. It is remarkable that, amid all of that, we advanced literally hundreds of legislative reforms. However, very few of those were noticed by the public as a result of the number of news stories on our disunity. Even though Kevin Rudd’s opponents went silently after he resumed the leadership in June 2013, the years of infighting and undermining had left Labor in an unwinnable position. The policy changes, the legislation passed, and the reforms delivered counted for very little against an overwhelming perception of disunity. All the Coalition had to do to win was hold their nerve when we inevitably made a comeback, as we did when Kevin Rudd resumed the Labor leadership. The crucial thing that the Coalition had in spades, and ruthlessly drove home their advantage with, was the biggest thing Labor’s team lacked: discipline. Any observer of politics would observe that really where the problems for the Labor Party started was when we removed a first-term prime minister [Kevin Rudd in 2010]. Whatever the details of our incapacity to get over that, the truth is that we never did. Figure 1: Extract from George Wright’s responses to questions following his address to the National Press Club, 29 October 2013 Source: Australianpolitics.com—<australianpolitics.com/2013/10/29/george-wright-alp-federal-election- analysis.html>.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Women in Australian Politics: Mothers Only Need Apply
    CONTEMPORARY GENDER ISSUES 5. Women in Australian politics: Mothers only need apply ABSTRACT When Julia Gillard considered running for the leadership of the Austral- ian Labor Party in early 2005, her political enemies immediately raised three reasons for opposing her: she is female, single and without children. These criticisms prompted a flurry of discussion in the media about the relevance of a person’s family situation to their ability to work effectively in politics. This article examines the treatment of female politicians by the press over the more than 80 years since the first woman appeared in any Australian parliament. It finds that there continues to be pressure on women to continue in the traditional roles of wife and mother, while more recently, female politicians have had to contend with an extra layer of coverage concentrating on their sexual attributes. CATHY JENKINS Griffith University, Queensland Introduction N JANUARY 2005 the Australian Labor Party was in the throes of elect- ing a new leader. One of those considering running to replace outgoing Ileader Mark Latham was Julia Gillard, a frontbencher who had proved her mettle in the shadow portfolios of immigration, indigenous affairs and health. But there were perceived problems. Gillard is female, single and child free, and her political enemies wasted no time in using these attributes as weapons against her. Many media outlets were prepared to jump on the sin- gle-and-child-free issue, with help from their political sources. ‘The relation- ship between sources and journalists resembles a dance, for sources seek access to journalists, and journalists seek access to sources, but more often than not, sources do the leading’ (Gans 1979, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010
    The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 Edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/rudd_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Rudd government : Australian Commonwealth administration 2007 - 2010 / edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans. ISBN: 9781921862069 (pbk.) 9781921862076 (eBook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Rudd, Kevin, 1957---Political and social views. Australian Labor Party. Public administration--Australia. Australia--Politics and government--2001- Other Authors/Contributors: Aulich, Chris, 1947- Evans, Mark Dr. Dewey Number: 324.29407 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by ANU E Press Illustrations by David Pope, The Canberra Times Printed by Griffin Press Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Contributors . ix Part I. Introduction 1 . It was the best of times; it was the worst of times . 3 Chris Aulich 2 . Issues and agendas for the term . 17 John Wanna Part II. The Institutions of Government 3 . The Australian Public Service: new agendas and reform . 35 John Halligan 4 . Continuity and change in the outer public sector .
    [Show full text]
  • Gillard Hopes for Commuter-Led Head of Steam
    News Store Page 1 of 1 Gillard hopes for commuter-led head of steam Author: Phillip Coorey CHIEF POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT Publication: Sydney Morning Herald Date: 11/08/2010 Section: News and Features Words: 442 Page: 6 Source: SMH TODAY'S promise by Julia Gillard that her government, if re- elected, will fund the majority of the cost for a rail link between Parramatta and Epping will tick a number of boxes for Labor. If well received, the announcement will bolster Labor's prospects in a crucial clutch of seats in western Sydney, reverse the trend that has seen significant infrastructure funds withheld from a hapless NSW government, and play to Gillard's original election campaign theme of sustainability. This election, she declared in the first days of the campaign, would be about "our very quality of life". Western Sydney's infrastructure has failed to keep up with the pressures of burgeoning population growth. If the current growth rate continues unabated, the region's population will double within 40 years. The proposed link will cut 25 minutes off the trip from Chatswood to Parramatta and take pressure off the western line. Commuters in five key seats will benefit - Parramatta, Bennelong, Lindsay, Greenway and Macarthur. Importantly, the government will put a timetable on the project. It says it will be completed in 2017. That's two more elections after this one but a commitment nonetheless. The Commonwealth's contribution of $2.1 billion will not be available until 2014-15, which is two elections away. This ensures the government can meet its promise to return the budget to surplus by 2012-13.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download the Stalking of Julia Gillard: How the Media and Team
    THE STALKING OF JULIA GILLARD: HOW THE MEDIA AND TEAM RUDD BROUGHT DOWN THE PRIME MINISTER PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kerry-Anne Walsh | 320 pages | 15 Feb 2014 | Allen & Unwin | 9781742379227 | English | Sydney, Australia The Stalking of Julia Gillard: How the Media and Team Rudd Brought Down the Prime Minister PDF Book July 11, at pm. It reminds one that journalists have often been compared to used car salesmen, the sale is the important thing not the truth. On this point Walsh remarks: One wonders if their bile and venom would be directed at a man; the disrespect they show Gillard and the office of prime minister is unprecedented. Disastrous because the book is just as quickly out of date as soon as it arrives on shelves. I've also heard good things about "Downfall". Does Walshe hold out her book as the definitive work or did she make and break a pact with MH that she would write a book to suit his wants on this? And the Daily Telegraph and The Age have never been the bastions of truth - ummm der! Given the negotiation that would have had to happen to get any legislation passed, this can only be seen as successful and a testament to their ability to negotiate with independents and other members of parliament. Leaks, rumours, polls and deniability: Kerry-Anne Walsh paints an ugly picture of Kevin Rudds road back to the prime ministership. It is about a politician who was never given a fair go; not in the media, not by Rudd, not by some in caucus.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 Gillard Web July 2013
    27 Julia Eileen GILLARD Prime Minister 24 June 2010 – 27 June 2013 • Julia Gillard became the 27th Prime Minister after she was elected unopposed in a ballot for the leadership of the Australian Labor Party. • Member of the Australian Labor Party. • Member of the House of Representatives for Lalor (Vic) 1998-, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, Minister for Education and Minister for Social Inclusion 2007-2010. Main achievements (2010-13) • The first woman to become Prime Minister, and the first woman to be Deputy Prime Minister. • Introduced the Clean Energy Bill 2011, a package of legislation establishing an emissions trading scheme to reduce Australia’s carbon emissions. • Introduced the National Disability Insurance Scheme, DisabilityCare Australia • Introduced legislation to reform the education system following the Gonski review, including funding to primary and secondary education. Personal life • Born 29 September 1961 in Barry, Glamorgan, Wales. Father John was a coal miner. • As a child suffered respiratory problems. Emigrated with her family to Adelaide in 1966 as ’£10 poms’ as a warmer climate was more suited to her health. • Attended Unley High School, University of Adelaide and University of Melbourne, graduating with arts and law degrees in 1986. • President of the Australian Union of Students 1983-1984 • Joined law firm Slater and Gordon in 1987. • Chief of Staff to Victorian ALP leader (later Premier) John Brumby 1996-1998 • Partner (since 2006) is Tim Mathieson. Character ‘Julia Gillard answers questions readily, laughs easily and has a nice line in self-deprecation...she is easy to talk to, hiding any natural wariness behind a smiling and relaxed manner.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Releas E
    Measuring Public Opinion For Over 70 Years – The Roy Morgan Research Centre Limited A.B.N. 91 004 433 265 – Quality System Certified to AS/NZS ISO 9001 Finding No. 5626 Available on Website: www.roymorgan.com On June 6, 2014 See Roy Morgan Online Store Electors say Bill Shorten (43%) is ‘Better PM’ than Tony Abbott (38%) for the first time But neither Leader has positive job approval Opposition Leader Bill Shorten (43%, up 7% since October 18-20, 2013) is now regarded as the ‘Better PM’ ahead of Prime Minister Tony Abbott (38%, down 2%) for the first time according to a special telephone Morgan Poll conducted over the last three nights (June 3-5, 2014). Job Performance – Approve/Disapprove Australian electors clearly disapprove of Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s handling of his job as Prime Minister with a massive 59% disapproving compared to only 34% that approve and 7% can’t say. E Australian electors have a similar view of Opposition Leader Bill Shorten’s handling of the job as Opposition Leader; 45% disapprove, 35% approve and 20% can’t say. Analysis by Gender Analysis by gender shows women clearly support Shorten (46%) cf. Abbott (37%) while support from men support Abbott (40%) and Shorten (40%) equally for Better Prime Minister. Majorities of both women (62%) and men (57%) disapprove of Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s handling of the job as Prime Minister compared to only 33% of women and 36% of men that approve. The figures are similar for Opposition Leader Bill Shorten with more women (43%) and men (47%) disapproving of Shorten’s handling of the job as Opposition Leader and only 36% of women and 34% of men approving.
    [Show full text]
  • Gillard/A Murderous Rage Julia Gillard
    Gillard/A Murderous Rage Julia Gillard: A Murderous Rage Roslyn Appleby, University of Technology, Sydney Abstract This chapter charts the political career of Julia Gillard, Australia’s first female Prime Minister (2010-2013), and argues that three intertwined discourses of gender shaped how she was perceived and represented in the political domain and in the media. First, Gillard was faced with the challenges such as the “double bind,” by which female leaders are expected to demonstrate qualities stereotypically associated with masculinity, and at the same time to display qualities stereotypically associated with femininity. Second, Gillard faced sexist abuse in politics and media which labelled her an “unintelligible being.” Third, in acts of “strategic essentialism,” Gillard condemned the misogyny she endured, repositioning herself as a coherent political force and marking the re-emergence of feminism in Australian politics. Keywords: normative discourses of gender, misogyny and sexism in media representation, double bind, strategic essentialism Introduction Julia Eileen Gillard served as Australia’s first female Prime Minister for three years and three days. During her time in office, from 2010 to 2013, she introduced a raft of significant social reforms, including improvements in regard to workplace regulation, educational opportunity, and disability care. But it was, arguably, her lack of conformity with normative gender regimes that had the most significant deleterious effect on perceptions and evaluations of her performance as Prime Minister. This chapter charts Julia Gillard’s political career, and argues that three specific discourses of gender shaped the ways in which she was perceived and represented in the political domain, in the media, and by the voting public.
    [Show full text]
  • On 12 November 2012 Prime Minister Julia Gillard Announced a Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Childhood Sexual Abuse…
    Lotus Times www.lotusplace.org.au • Queensland • SPECIAL EDITION | NOVEMBER 2018 Lotus Times is published in collaboration with The Special Edition Historical Abuse Network which works collaboratively with people who experienced abuse and neglect in The National Apology to Victims and Survivors of institutions, foster care and detention centres. We Institutional Child Sexual Abuse as presented by Prime acknowledge their courage as they move from adversity Minister of Australia Scott Morrison and Leader of the to hope in seeking public recognition, justice and redress. Opposition Bill Shorten. A National Apology. On 12 November 2012 Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced a Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Childhood Sexual Abuse… “Today I have announced that I will be I believe a Royal Commission is the best recommending to the Governor-General way to do this. the establishment of a Royal Commission into institutional responses to instances … I commend the victims involved for and allegations of child sexual abuse in having the courage to speak out. Australia. I believe we must do everything we can to The allegations that have come to light make sure that what has happened in the recently about child sexual abuse have past is never allowed to happen again,” been heartbreaking. – PM Julia Gillard. These are insidious, evil acts to which no child should be subject. The individuals concerned deserve the Almost six years later, after an extensive most thorough of investigations into the Royal Commission, Prime Minister wrongs that have been committed against of Australia Scott Morrison and Leader them. of the Opposition Bill Shorten joined in Parliament to make a formal National They deserve to have their voices heard Apology to Victims and Survivors of and their claims investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2004 Monthly Report
    EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO AUSTRALIA Canberra, 8 August 2012 BS/bs 12.201 – 01.05 MONTHLY REPORT ON AUSTRALIA July 2012 Table of Contents 1. POLITICAL SITUATION.......................................................................................2 2. INTERNATIONAL ISSUES ...................................................................................3 Defence and Security...............................................................................................4 The Pacific...............................................................................................................5 Development and Aid ..............................................................................................5 EU-Australia relations .............................................................................................5 3. SECTORAL ISSUES ..............................................................................................6 Trade and Investment...............................................................................................6 Economic and Financial Affairs...............................................................................6 Regulatory Issues.....................................................................................................8 Agriculture and Fisheries .........................................................................................8 Environment ............................................................................................................8 Transport and Infrastructure.....................................................................................9
    [Show full text]