King Protea Botanical Name: Protea Cynaroides
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CRANE's CAPE TOURS & TRAVEL P.O.BOX 26277 * HOUT BAY * 7872 CAPE TOWN * SOUTH AFRICA TEL: / FAX: (021) 790 0616CELL: 083 65 99 777E-Mail: [email protected]
CRANE'S CAPE TOURS & TRAVEL P.O.BOX 26277 * HOUT BAY * 7872 CAPE TOWN * SOUTH AFRICA TEL: / FAX: (021) 790 0616CELL: 083 65 99 777E-Mail: [email protected] SOUTH AFRICA'S SOUTH-WESTERN CAPE 1 – 14 OCTOBER 2011 Participants Val Codling George and Susan Battle John and Jan Croft Leader Geoff Crane Report and wildlife lists by Geoff Crane. Photos edged red by Geoff Crane and edged blue by John or Jan Croft, all taken during the holiday. More of Geoff’s photos can be seen via http://www.honeyguide.co.uk/wildlife-holidays/westerncape.html Cover photo – Southern Double-collared Sunbird; Strelitzia 'Nelson Mandela'; Southern Right Whale. As with all Honeyguide holidays, £40 of the price per person was put towards a conservation project in the host country. £250 from the Honeyguide Wildlife Trust Ltd. was matched by Geoff Crane and donated to the SABAP2 project ( http://sabap2.adu.org.za/index.php) . This is updating the first Southern African Bird Atlas Project which ran from 1987-1991 and culminated in the publication in 1997 of two volumes on the distribution and relative abundance of southern African birds. Our contribution will be used to atlas areas that no-one has yet been to. As at November 2011, the amount of all conservation contributions made through Honeyguide since 1991 totals £73,500. 2 South Africa’s South-Western Cape 1 – 14 October 2011 DAY 1. Saturday 1 st October 2011 Orientation tour / Silvermine Nature Reserve / Kommetjie Overcast with a light wind. The flight arrived on time (to the second) and we had cleared the airport by 9am. -
Pathogens Associated with Diseases. of Protea, Leucospermum and Leucadendron Spp
PATHOGENS ASSOCIATED WITH DISEASES. OF PROTEA, LEUCOSPERMUM AND LEUCADENDRON SPP. Lizeth Swart Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Prof. P. W. Crous Decem ber 1999 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION 1, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted at any university for a degree. SIGNATURE: DATE: Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za PATHOGENS ASSOCIATED WITH DISEASES OF PROTEA, LEUCOSPERMUM ANDLEUCADENDRONSPP. SUMMARY The manuscript consists of six chapters that represent research on different diseases and records of new diseases of the Proteaceae world-wide. The fungal descriptions presented in this thesis are not effectively published, and will thus be formally published elsewhere in scientific journals. Chapter one is a review that gives a detailed description of the major fungal pathogens of the genera Protea, Leucospermum and Leucadendron, as reported up to 1996. The pathogens are grouped according to the diseases they cause on roots, leaves, stems and flowers, as well as the canker causing fungi. In chapter two, several new fungi occurring on leaves of Pro tea, Leucospermum, Telopea and Brabejum collected from South Africa, Australia or New Zealand are described. The following fungi are described: Cladophialophora proteae, Coniolhyrium nitidae, Coniothyrium proteae, Coniolhyrium leucospermi,Harknessia leucospermi, Septoria prolearum and Mycosphaerella telopeae spp. nov. Furthermore, two Phylloslicla spp., telopeae and owaniana are also redecribed. The taxonomy of the Eisinoe spp. -
Protea Newsletter International
Protea Newsletter International An eNewsletter for the International Protea Industry and Scientific Community to Promote Communication, Cooperation and the Advancement of Science, Technology, Production and Marketing (and to promote the Hawaii Protea Industry) Volume 2, Number 1, April 2009 Editor: Ken Leonhardt Chairman, lnternational Protea Working Group (IPWG), International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS) Professor, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii USA Contents: A visit to South Africa ............................................................................. 2 International Horticulture Congress announcement .................................. 3 New protea poster from the University of Hawaii..................................... 4 A message from the Hawaii State Protea Growers Corporation ................ 4 A message from the Zimbabwe Protea Association .................................. 5 Protea nightlife ....................................................................................... 6 Proteaceae cultivar development and uses ................................................ 6 Sample costs to establish and produce protea ........................................... 6 Research funding awarded by the IPA...................................................... 7 New cultivar registrations......................................................................... 7 Recent books on Proteaceae .................................................................... -
Protea Cynaroides (L.) L
TAXON: Protea cynaroides (L.) L. SCORE: -2.0 RATING: Low Risk Taxon: Protea cynaroides (L.) L. Family: Proteaceae Common Name(s): king protea Synonym(s): Leucadendron cynaroides L. Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 19 Apr 2017 WRA Score: -2.0 Designation: L Rating: Low Risk Keywords: Woody Shrub, Unarmed, Lignotuber, Serotinous, Resprouter Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) Intermediate tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 n subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric weed 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems 409 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle y=1, n=0 n Tolerates a wide range of soil conditions (or limestone 410 y=1, n=0 y conditions if not a volcanic island) Creation Date: 19 Apr 2017 (Protea cynaroides (L.) L.) Page 1 of 15 TAXON: Protea cynaroides (L.) L. -
Some Factors Influencing the Sudden Death Syndrome in Cut Flower Plants
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Massey Research Online Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME IN CUT FLOWER PLANTS A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Horti cultural Science at Massey University Clinton N Bowyer 1996 11 ABSTRACT Soil/root mixes from plants with the Sudden Collapse Syndrome of cut flower plants were tested for Phytophthora infection using a lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) baiting technique. Boronia heterophylla and Leucadendron 'Wilsons Wonder' root samples both caused the lupin seedlings to exhibit symptoms of Phytophthora infection. The efficacy of phosphorous acid (Foschek® 500 at 1000 ppm and 2000 ppm) and a combination of phosphorous acid and an additional product (Foschek® 500 and C408 at 1000/200 ppm and 2000/400 ppm) in controlling Phytophthora cinnamomi root infections of L 'W ilsons Wonder', B.heterophylla and B. megastigma rooted cuttings was compared with fosetyl AI (Aliette® 80 SP at 1000 ppm and 2000 ppm) under conditions of high disease pressure. The fungicides were applied as a root drench 7 days prior to the roots being inoculated by a split wheat technique and the effect of the fungicides and their concentrations on the rate of plant mortality was measured. The results were species dependent. -
Field Guide for Wild Flower Harvesting
FIELD GUIDE FOR WILD FLOWER HARVESTING 1 Contents Introducing the Field Guide for Wild Flower Harvesting 3 Glossary 4 Introducing The Field Guide Fynbos 6 for Wild Flower Harvesting What is fynbos? 7 The Cape Floral Kingdom 7 Many people in the Overberg earn a living from the region’s wild flowers, known as South African plants 8 fynbos. Some pick flowers for markets to sell, some remove invasive alien plants, and Threats to fynbos 8 others are involved in conservation and nature tourism. It is important that people The value of fynbos 9 who work in the veld know about fynbos plants. This Field Guide for Wild Flower Harvesting describes 41 of the most popular types of fynbos plants that are picked from Fynbos and fire 9 our region for the wild flower market. It also provides useful information to support Classification of plants 9 sustainable harvesting in particular and fynbos conservation in general. Naming of plants 10 Picking flowers has an effect or impact on the veld. If we are not careful, we can Market for fynbos 10 damage, or even kill, plants. So, before picking flowers, it is important to ask: Picking fynbos with care 11 • What can be picked? The Sustainable Harvesting Programme 12 • How much can be picked? • How should flowers be picked? The SHP Code of Best Practice for Wild Harvesters 12 Ten principles of good harvesting 13 This guide aims to help people understand: The Vulnerability Index and the Red Data List 13 • the differences between the many types of fynbos plants that grow in the veld; and Know how much fynbos you have 14 • which fynbos plants can be picked, and which are scarce and should rather be Fynbos plants of the Agulhas Plain and beyond 14 left in the veld. -
The Functional Role of Birds As Pollinators in Southern Cape Fynbos
The functional role of birds as pollinators in southern Cape fynbos. Kellyn J. Whitehead A thesis presented in fulfilment of the academic requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Ecological Sciences At the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa January 2018 1 ABSTRACT Nectarivorous birds, particularly sunbirds, are important pollinators of plants in the Cape Flora of South Africa, being responsible for pollinating approximately 5% of plant species. However, interactions between plants and nectarivorous birds in the eastern part of the Cape Floristic Region have not received much attention. This study focussed on two putatively bird-pollinated plant species found within the Nature’s Valley area, namely Kniphofia uvaria and Chasmanthe aethiopica. The breeding systems were determined for each species and, due to their patchy population distribution, potential Allee effects on plant fecundity were also tested for. Flowering phenology in the area was also examined to test for associations between flowering of bird-pollinated plant species and the temporal presence of nectarivorous birds. Selective exclusion experiments showed that sunbirds were the main pollinators of K. uvaria and C. aethiopica – fruit set and the number of viable seeds were much higher for untreated (open control) individuals where birds could visit flowers freely, compared to caged individuals which only allowed for insect visitation. Very few seeds developed when plants of the two species were bagged to exclude all pollinators, indicating that the species are not capable of autonomous self-fertilization. Fruit and seed set were determined for patches of K. uvaria and C. aethiopica in order to test for potential Allee effects. -
Norrie's Plant Descriptions - Index of Common Names a Key to Finding Plants by Their Common Names (Note: Not All Plants in This Document Have Common Names Listed)
UC Santa Cruz Arboretum & Botanic Garden Plant Descriptions A little help in finding what you’re looking for - basic information on some of the plants offered for sale in our nursery This guide contains descriptions of some of plants that have been offered for sale at the UC Santa Cruz Arboretum & Botanic Garden. This is an evolving document and may contain errors or omissions. New plants are added to inventory frequently. Many of those are not (yet) included in this collection. Please contact the Arboretum office with any questions or suggestions: [email protected] Contents copyright © 2019, 2020 UC Santa Cruz Arboretum & Botanic Gardens printed 27 February 2020 Norrie's Plant Descriptions - Index of common names A key to finding plants by their common names (Note: not all plants in this document have common names listed) Angel’s Trumpet Brown Boronia Brugmansia sp. Boronia megastigma Aster Boronia megastigma - Dark Maroon Flower Symphyotrichum chilense 'Purple Haze' Bull Banksia Australian Fuchsia Banksia grandis Correa reflexa Banksia grandis - compact coastal form Ball, everlasting, sago flower Bush Anemone Ozothamnus diosmifolius Carpenteria californica Ozothamnus diosmifolius - white flowers Carpenteria californica 'Elizabeth' Barrier Range Wattle California aster Acacia beckleri Corethrogyne filaginifolia - prostrate Bat Faced Cuphea California Fuchsia Cuphea llavea Epilobium 'Hummingbird Suite' Beach Strawberry Epilobium canum 'Silver Select' Fragaria chiloensis 'Aulon' California Pipe Vine Beard Tongue Aristolochia californica Penstemon 'Hidalgo' Cat Thyme Bird’s Nest Banksia Teucrium marum Banksia baxteri Catchfly Black Coral Pea Silene laciniata Kennedia nigricans Catmint Black Sage Nepeta × faassenii 'Blue Wonder' Salvia mellifera 'Terra Seca' Nepeta × faassenii 'Six Hills Giant' Black Sage Chilean Guava Salvia mellifera Ugni molinae Salvia mellifera 'Steve's' Chinquapin Blue Fanflower Chrysolepis chrysophylla var. -
Kirstenbosch NBG List of Plants That Provide Food for Honey Bees
Indigenous South African Plants that Provide Food for Honey Bees Honey bees feed on nectar (carbohydrates) and pollen (protein) from a wide variety of flowering plants. While the honey bee forages for nectar and pollen, it transfers pollen from one flower to another, providing the service of pollination, which allows the plant to reproduce. However, bees don’t pollinate all flowers that they visit. This list is based on observations of bees visiting flowers in Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, and on a variety of references, in particular the following: Plant of the Week articles on www.PlantZAfrica.com Johannsmeier, M.F. 2005. Beeplants of the South-Western Cape, Nectar and pollen sources of honeybees (revised and expanded). Plant Protection Research Institute Handbook No. 17. Agricultural Research Council, Plant Protection Research Institute, Pretoria, South Africa This list is primarily Western Cape, but does have application elsewhere. When planting, check with a local nursery for subspecies or varieties that occur locally to prevent inappropriate hybridisations with natural veld species in your vicinity. Annuals Gazania spp. Scabiosa columbaria Arctotis fastuosa Geranium drakensbergensis Scabiosa drakensbergensis Arctotis hirsuta Geranium incanum Scabiosa incisa Arctotis venusta Geranium multisectum Selago corymbosa Carpanthea pomeridiana Geranium sanguineum Selago canescens Ceratotheca triloba (& Helichrysum argyrophyllum Selago villicaulis ‘Purple Turtle’ carpenter bees) Helichrysum cymosum Senecio glastifolius Dimorphotheca -
The Potential of South African Indigenous Plants for the International Cut flower Trade ⁎ E.Y
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com South African Journal of Botany 77 (2011) 934–946 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb The potential of South African indigenous plants for the international cut flower trade ⁎ E.Y. Reinten a, J.H. Coetzee b, B.-E. van Wyk c, a Department of Agronomy, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag, Matieland 7606, South Africa b P.O. Box 2086, Dennesig 7601, South Africa c Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa Abstract A broad review is presented of recent developments in the commercialization of southern Africa indigenous flora for the cut flower trade, in- cluding potted flowers and foliages (“greens”). The botany, horticultural traits and potential for commercialization of several indigenous plants have been reported in several publications. The contribution of species indigenous and/or endemic to southern Africa in the development of cut flower crop plants is widely acknowledged. These include what is known in the trade as gladiolus, freesia, gerbera, ornithogalum, clivia, agapan- thus, strelitzia, plumbago and protea. Despite the wealth of South African flower bulb species, relatively few have become commercially important in the international bulb industry. Trade figures on the international markets also reflect the importance of a few species of southern African origin. The development of new research tools are contributing to the commercialization of South African plants, although propagation, cultivation and post-harvest handling need to be improved. A list of commercially relevant southern African cut flowers (including those used for fresh flowers, dried flowers, foliage and potted flowers) is presented, together with a subjective evaluation of several genera and species with perceived potential for the development of new crops for the florist trade. -
Australian Wildflower Product Directory
Australian wildflower product directory This chart covers the most commonly grown products for which a quality specification or product factsheet are available (to see it, click on to the link in the right hand column). The Australian wildflower industry supplies many other products (both species and varieties of the products listed here, and additional products).` (Foliage products listed at end) Product image Botanical name Common name Flowering season Typical vase life (days) Product(s) Links to more information (quality (note: not all to same available specification or product factsheet) scale) Acacia Wattle, mimosa Different species provide A. Flowers and See p. 93 in Postharvest Manual* Range of species including: flowers year-round product baileyana only 3–6, foliage https://www.agrifutures.com.au/wp- content/uploads/publications/10-027.pdf A. baileyana (Cootamundra wattle), other species 6–10. (depending A. buxifolia (Box-leaf wattle), A. cultriformis (Knife-leaf wattle), A. Species with vase lives of on species) dealbata (Silver wattle), A. >7 days, include A. floribunda (White sallow wattle), A. buxifolia, A. cultriformis, retinodes (Wirilda, Swamp wattle, A. floribunda, A. Silver wattle) retinodes and forms of A. A. cultriformis dealbata Actinotus helianthi Flannel flower August–January, peak in 14–21 Flowers https://www.agrifutures.com.au/wp- spring (field-grown flowers); content/uploads/publications/10-028.pdf all year round (but limited volume at times) for selected cultivars grown in greenhouses Anigozanthos species Kangaroo paw August–December (other 10–15 Flowers https://www.agrifutures.com.au/wp- Cultivar: ‘Big Red’ cultivars flower all year round content/uploads/publications/10-029.pdf or at different times) 1 Product image Botanical name Common name Flowering season Typical vase life (days) Product(s) Links to more information (quality (note: not all to same available specification or product factsheet) scale) Backhousia myrtifolia Backhousia October–January, with peak 9–12 Flowers and p. -
Proteaceae Floral Crops; Cultivar Development and Underexploited Uses
Proteaceae Floral Crops; Cultivar Development and Underexploited Uses Kenneth W. Leonhardt and Richard A. Criley The Proteaceae apparently originated on the southern supercontinent Gondwana long before it divided and began drifting apart during the Mesozoic era, accounting for the presence of the Proteaceae on all of the southern continents (Brits 1984a). The Protea family comprises about 1400 species in over 60 genera, of which over 800 species in 45 genera are from Australia. Africa claims about 400 species, including 330 species in 14 genera from the western Cape. About 90 species occur in Central and South America, 80 on islands east of New Guinea, and 45 in New Caledonia. Madagascar, New Guinea, New Zealand, and South- east Asia host small numbers of species (Rebelo 1995). Proteas are neither herbaceous nor annual, and they are always woody. Their structural habit is vari- able from groundcover forms with creeping stems, and those with underground stems, to vertical to spread- ing shrubs, to tree forms. The leaves are generally large, lignified, hard, and leathery. A mature leaf will generally snap rather than fold when bent. The leaf anatomy is specially adapted for water conservation and drought resistance. These characteristics and the high leaf carbon to nitrogen ratio render the leaves indi- gestible to most insect pests (Rebelo 1995), accounting for the relatively pest-free status of most commer- cial protea plantings. The distribution of the family is linked to the occurrence of soils that are extremely deficient in plant nutrients (Brits 1984a). An accommodating characteristic of the family is the presence of proteoid roots.