How a Bill Becomes Law: 84Th Legislature 4 6 8 8 14 15 16 17

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How a Bill Becomes Law: 84Th Legislature 4 6 8 8 14 15 16 17 February 26, 2015 How a Bill Becomes Law: 84th Legislature The bill in committee The Texas Constitution and the rules of the House and the Senate govern 2 the movement of bills through the Legislature. This report summarizes the key constitutional provisions and rules governing bills in the Legislature, with Highlights of changes emphasis on the Texas House Rules. HR 4 by Smithee, adopted by the House 4 to House rules on January 15, 2015, contains the House rules for the 84th Legislature. The calendars system References to bills in this report also apply to joint resolutions unless 6 otherwise noted. Order of business Form and content of bills 8 Each bill filed in the Legislature must have three Floor consideration Bill components. 8 parts: • Senate procedures a descriptive caption beginning, “A Bill to be Entitled an Act,” along with a brief statement on the subject of the bill; 14 • an enacting or resolving clause, “Be it Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas”; and After passage by • the body of the bill (Rule 8, sec. 1). 15 both houses Each bill must pertain to only one subject, except for the general End-of-session appropriations bill, recodification bills, and joint resolutions (Constitution, Art. deadlines 16 3, sec. 35; Rule 8, sec. 3; Rule 9, sec. 1(b)). The governor’s role All revenue-raising bills must originate in the House (Constitution, Art. 17 3, sec. 33). A House bill that would impose or change a tax or fee must include a short statement at the end of its caption indicating the effect of the bill on the proposed tax or fee (Rule 8, sec. This report summarizes the 1(b)), such as “imposing a tax.” Similarly, a House key constitutional provisions and rules bill’s caption must reflect the creation of an offense, an governing bills in the Legislature, with increase in a punishment, or a change in the eligibility emphasis on House rules. of a person for parole or supervision (Rule 8, sec. 1(c)) and must indicate when a bill would create or expand the applicability of an occupational license (Rule 8, sec. 1(d)). Number 84-2 Page 2 House Research Organization Prohibited bills. Certain local and special bills are 1. bills creating or affecting water districts; banned by the Constitution in Art. 3, sec. 56. Examples 2. bills creating or affecting hospital districts; include bills that would grant individual divorces, change 3. bills creating or affecting road utility districts; venue in civil or criminal cases, change the names of 4. bills relating to hunting, fishing, or wildlife persons, or legalize invalid wills or deeds. conservation in a specified locality; 5. bills creating or affecting a county court or The House rules also prohibit consideration of statutory court or courts for one or more specified population “bracket” bills, which use population ranges counties or municipalities; and to limit a bill’s application to a particular city or county 6. bills creating or affecting a juvenile board or without naming the locality. (An example of a bill in boards of a specified county or counties. this category might be one that applied to cities with populations of more than 2,999 but less than 3,001.) If bills of the last three types affect “a sufficient However, bills may use a population minimum or number” of localities, counties, or municipalities so that maximum that “bears a reasonable relation” to the bill’s they would apply generally or have statewide importance, purpose (Rule 8, sec. 10(b)). they are not considered local bills (Rule 8, sec. 10(d)). Authorship. A bill or resolution has one primary First reading and referral to committee. To author, who may designate, by written authorization filed become law, a bill must be read in the House and in the with the chief clerk, up to four joint authors. Names of Senate on three separate days. This requirement may be joint authors appear on official printings of the measure, suspended by a four-fifths vote of the members present on calendars, and in the House Journal. A bill or resolution (Constitution, Art. 3, sec. 32; Rule 8, sec. 15). also may have an unlimited number of coauthors, who must have written authorization from the primary author After a bill is filed, the chief clerk assigns a number filed with the chief clerk. Coauthors may withdraw their to the bill. First reading occurs when the reading clerk, names by notifying the chief clerk (Rule 8, sec. 5). while the House is in session, reads the bill caption and announces the committee to which the speaker has referred Filing of bills. Beginning the first Monday after the the bill. The speaker subsequently may correct the referral general election preceding the regular session, or 30 days and assign the bill to a different committee, which usually before any special session, members and members-elect occurs shortly after the initial referral. The speaker’s may prefile bills and resolutions (Rule 8, sec. 7). A member referral also may be changed by a majority vote of the may introduce any type of bill or joint resolution during House (Rule 1, sec. 4; Rule 8, sec. 6). the first 60 days of the regular session. The 60th day of the 2015 regular session will be Friday, March 13. After the 60th day, a four-fifths vote of the members present is The bill in committee required to introduce bills or joint resolutions, other than certain emergency matters submitted by the governor, No bill may become law unless it is referred to and emergency appropriations, and local bills (Rule 8, sec. 8). reported by a committee (Constitution, Art. 3, sec. 37; Rule 8, sec. 11). Much of the Legislature’s work occurs in Members may file measures electronically with committee. the chief clerk. This rule, newly adopted by the 84th Legislature, replaces previous requirements that a certain Standing and select committees. The House number of printed copies of each bill be filed with the chief Rules of the 84th Legislature establish 38 standing clerk (Rule 8, sec. 9). committees and their jurisdictions (Rule 3). Thirty-two are substantive committees, while six – Calendars, Local Local bill requirements. A notice of a legislator’s and Consent Calendars, Rules and Resolutions, General intention to file a local bill must be published in a Investigating and Ethics, House Administration, and newspaper in the affected locality at least 30 days before Redistricting – are procedural committees. Although the bill is introduced (Constitution, Art. 3, sec. 57; procedural committees generally do not review and report Government Code, sec. 313.002; Rule 8, sec. 10). There legislation, the speaker may refer bills to the General are six types of local bills: Investigating and Ethics, House Administration, and Redistricting committees. House Research Organization Page 3 The speaker by proclamation may create select considers the bill. If the bill is amended to alter its fiscal committees and specify their jurisdiction, authority, duties, implications, the chair must obtain an updated fiscal note. and duration (Rule 1, sec. 16(b)). Speakers have appointed Fiscal notes remain with the bill throughout the legislative select committees at the start of the session to allow process (Rule 4, sec. 33). the House to consider emergency legislation before the standing committees have been appointed. Another purpose Impact statements. As with fiscal notes, the chair of select committees is to consider certain issues that cross determines whether a bill requires an impact statement, committee jurisdictional lines or to focus on particular which also is prepared by the LBB. Impact statements issues. For example, for the 84th Legislature, Speaker Joe include a criminal justice policy impact statement, for Straus created a select committee on Emerging Issues In legislation proposing a change in punishment for felonies Texas Law Enforcement and another on State and Federal committed by adults; an equalized education funding Power and Responsibility. During the interim following the impact statement, for legislation proposing a change in the 2013 regular session, Speaker Straus created several select public school finance system; and a water development committees to conduct interim studies. policy impact statement, for legislation proposing to create certain water districts. For legislation that would create Committee chairs. The speaker appoints a chair and or affect a state tax or fee, tax equity notes estimate how vice chair for each committee. The chairs of committees the proposal would change the distribution of tax and fee determine if and when a bill will be considered, although burdens among individuals and businesses. For legislation they are required to consult with the committee members affecting a public retirement system, actuarial impact on the work schedule and the order of consideration statements are prepared by the LBB in cooperation with the of matters before the committee. They also appoint all State Pension Review Board. A dynamic economic impact subcommittee chairs and members (Rule 4, secs. 6, 44). statement, prepared for the general appropriations bill, estimates the number of state employees affected and the Committee meetings. After the committees are impact on private sector and local government employment appointed and organized, the committee coordinator, under due to any spending change from one fiscal biennium to the direction of the Committee on House Administration, another. prepares a schedule for regular committee meetings. Committees may meet at other times when called by the A rule adopted by the 84th Legislature requires a bill chair, as determined by the committee, or as designated by analysis to contain a statement indicating whether the the speaker (Rule 4, sec. 8). measure expressly creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an offense, or changes the eligibility of a Analysis before committee action.
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Panel Systems Catalog
    Table of Contents Page Title Page Number Terms and Conditions 3 - 4 Specifications 5 2.0 and SB3 Panel System Options 16 - 17 Wood Finish Options 18 Standard Textile Options 19 2.0 Paneling System Fabric Panel with Wooden Top Cap 6 - 7 Fabric Posts and Wooden End Caps 8 - 9 SB3 Paneling System Fabric Panel with Wooden Top Cap 10 - 11 Fabric Posts with Wooden Top Cap 12 - 13 Wooden Posts 14 - 15 revision 1.0 - 12/2/2020 Terms and Conditions 1. Terms of Payment ∙Qualified Customers will have Net 30 days from date of order completion, and a 1% discount if paid within 10 days of the invoice date. ∙Customers lacking credentials may be required down payment or deposit in full prior to production. ∙Finance charges of 2% will be applied to each invoice past 30 days. ∙Terms of payment will apply unless modified in writing by Custom Office Design, Inc. 2. Pricing ∙All pricing is premised on product that is made available for will call to the buyer pre-assembled and unpackaged from our base of operations in Auburn, WA. ∙Prices subject to change without notice. Price lists noting latest date supersedes all previously published price lists. Pricing does not include A. Delivery, Installation, or Freight-handling charges. B. Product Packaging, or Crating charges. C. Custom Product Detail upcharge. D. Special-Order/Non-standard Laminate, Fabric, Staining and/or Labor upcharge. E. On-site service charges. F. Federal, state or local taxes. 3. Ordering A. All orders must be made in writing and accompanied with a corresponding purchase order.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Draft Investigatory Powers Bill
    Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament Report on the draft Investigatory Powers Bill Chair: The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament Report on the draft Investigatory Powers Bill Chair: The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 3 of the Justice and Security Act 2013 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 9 February 2016 HC 795 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us via isc.independent.gov.uk/contact Print ISBN 9781474127714 Web ISBN 9781474127721 ID 26011601 02/16 53894 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office THE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE OF PARLIAMENT The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC MP (Chair) The Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Duncan KCMG MP The Rt. Hon. Fiona Mactaggart MP The Rt. Hon. George Howarth MP The Rt. Hon. Angus Robertson MP The Rt. Hon. the Lord Janvrin GCB GCVO QSO The Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Victor Jenkins CDG., CSA FILM PRODUCTION COMPANY DIRECTOR / PRODUCER
    Victor Jenkins CDG., CSA FILM PRODUCTION COMPANY DIRECTOR / PRODUCER THE SECRET LIFE OF FLOWERS Bazmark Films Baz Luhrmann (Short) Catherine Knapman/Baz Luhrmann SEE YOU SOON eMotion Entertainment David Mahmoudieh David Stern BROTHERHOOD Unstoppable Entertainment Noel Clarke Jason Maza/Gina Powell ACCESS ALL AREAS Camden Film Co. BrYn Higgins Oliver Veysey/Bill Curbishley AWAY Gateway Films/Slam David Blair Mike Knowles/Louise Delamere NORTHMEN – A VIKING SAGA Elite Film Produktion Claudio Faeh Ralph S. Dietrich/Daniel Hoeltschi INTO THE WOODS (UK Casting Walt Disney Pictures Rob Marshall Consultants) John DeLuca/Marc Platt/ Callum McDougall THE MUPPETS MOST WANTED Walt Disney Pictures James Bobin (UK Casting) Todd Lieberman TOMORROWLAND Walt Disney Pictures Brad Bird (UK Search) Damon Lindelof ANGELICA Pierpoline Films inc Mitchell Lichtenstein Joyce Pierpoline/Richard Lormand IRONCLAD: BATTLE FOR BLOOD Mythic Entertainment Jonathan English Rick Benattar/Andrew Curtis NOT ANOTHER HAPPY ENDING Synchronicity Films John McKaY Claire Mundell BEAUTIFUL CREATURES Alcon Entertainment/Warner Bros. Richard LaGravenese (UK Search) Erwin Stoff / David Valdés STAR TREK 2 (UK Search) Bad Robot/Paramount J.J. Abrams Damon Lindelof KEITH LEMON – THE FILM Generator Entertainment/Lionsgate UK Paul Angunawela Aidan Elliot/Mark Huffam/Simon Bosanquet HIGHWAY TO DHAMPUS Fifty Films Rick McFarland John De Blas Williams ELFIE HOPKINS Size 9/Black & Blue Films Ryan Andrews Michael Wiggs/Jonathan Sothcott Victor Jenkins Casting Ltd T: 020 3457 0506 / M: 07919
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    BAM 2013 Winter/Spring Season Brooklyn Academy of Music BAM, the Royal Shakespeare Company, Alan H. Fishman, and The Ohio State University present Chairman of the Board William I. Campbell, Vice Chairman of the Board Adam E. Max, Julius Vice Chairman of the Board Karen Brooks Hopkins, President Joseph V. Melillo, Caesar Executive Producer Royal Shakespeare Company By William Shakespeare BAM Harvey Theater Apr 10—13, 16—20 & 23—27 at 7:30pm Apr 13, 20 & 27 at 2pm; Apr 14, 21 & 28 at 3pm Approximate running time: two hours and 40 minutes, including one intermission Directed by Gregory Doran Designed by Michael Vale Lighting designed by Vince Herbert Music by Akintayo Akinbode Sound designed by Jonathan Ruddick BAM 2013 Winter/Spring Season sponsor: Movement by Diane Alison-Mitchell Fights by Kev McCurdy Associate director Gbolahan Obisesan BAM 2013 Theater Sponsor Julius Caesar was made possible by a generous gift from Frederick Iseman The first performance of this production took place on May 28, 2012 at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Leadership support provided by The Peter Jay Stratford-upon-Avon. Sharp Foundation, Betsy & Ed Cohen / Arete Foundation, and the Hutchins Family Foundation The Royal Shakespeare Company in America is Major support for theater at BAM: presented in collaboration with The Ohio State University. The Corinthian Foundation The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation Stephanie & Timothy Ingrassia Donald R. Mullen, Jr. The Fan Fox & Leslie R. Samuels Foundation, Inc. Post-Show Talk: Members of the Royal Shakespeare Company The Morris and Alma Schapiro Fund Friday, April 26. Free to same day ticket holders The SHS Foundation The Shubert Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Birth of the Bill of Rights by Robert Allen Rutland
    19561 BOOK REVIEWS The Birth of the Bill of Rights. By Robert Allen Rutland. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1955. Pp. 243. $5.00. The federal Bill of Rights is one of the most cherished documents in our national hagiography. Its clauses have been invoked by contending parties in every crisis of our history. Every sort of minority interest has sought se- curity in its generous phrases. Its meaning has long been the subject of in- tense controversy among lawyers and judges. The judicial gloss upon its words and phrases has attained enormous proportions. Yet in spite of all this, surprisingly little scholarly work has been done on the history of the Bill of Rights.1 The interest of American historians in constitutional history, once so pronounced, seems to have spent itself. Such newer pastures as those of in- tellectual and business history appear to be greener. It is a long time since our historians have produced a significant new work in the field of constitu- tional history. Political scientists and legal scholars are gradually moving in to fill the vacuum.2 We have had, of course, a number of historical studies of particular aspects of civil liberties,3 but we have never had a thorough, criti- cal, substantial, scholarly study of the origins of the American Bill of Rights. In fact, Rutland's treatise, The Birth of the Bill of Rights, is, to my knowl- edge, the first book-length study by a historical scholar ever written on the subject. While Rutland should be given credit for making the attempt, his book does not by any means fill this gap in historical scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2013 Issue
    Journal of the California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions The Sphere August, 2013 August 2013 LAFCo Report Card – Are We Meeting the Legislative Intent? BY BEVERLY BURR, BURR CONSULTING (LOU ANN TEXEIRA, CONTRA COSTA LAFCO, CONTRIBUTOR) ANNUAL The 2001 CKH Act brought a new Looking strictly by the numbers, CONFERENCE requirement to LAFCos of LAFCos have certainly succeeded EDITION conducting municipal service reviews on the knowledge front. A review (MSRs). Twelve years have passed of the LAFCo websites shows that 2013 Report to the as LAFCos have busily worked on half of the LAFCos have completed Membership MSRs. Excellent timing for asking at least one cycle of MSRs and SOI the big questions: how well have we updates for all cities and special Thoughts on LAFCo LAFCos done in meeting the districts under their jurisdiction. Golden Anniversary from legislative intent behind the MSR Another 19 percent of LAFCos the Founding Fathers of requirement? What barriers and have nearly completed their first LAFCo constraints are we facing in the cycle, typically with a few MSRs or implementation? SOI updates yet to complete. A quarter of the LAFCos are partly The Future of The Commission on Local done with their first cycle; mostly Annexations and Governance for the 21st Century and LAFCos with relatively small the Little Hoover Commission laid Incorporations budgets, these have prioritized the groundwork for the MSR review of cities and districts requirement in the late 1990s. Three Message from the Chair: providing “backbone” services like over-arching objectives they CALAFCO fire protection and water. The envisioned were: remains strong status at the remainder could not be Knowledge – enhancing LAFCo readily discerned from their Remembering a Friend: legitimacy, power and wisdom by respective websites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Women's Wrongs and the Bill of 'Rights': a Bicentennial Perspective
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1992 The Politics of Women's Wrongs and the Bill of 'Rights': A Bicentennial Perspective Mary E. Becker Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mary E. Becker, "The Politics of Women's Wrongs and the Bill of 'Rights': A Bicentennial Perspective," 59 University of Chicago Law Review 453 (1992). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Politics of Women's Wrongs and the Bill of "Rights": A Bicentennial Perspective Mary E. Beckert The language of the Bill of Rights is almost entirely gender neutral and its provisions have always applied to some women.' But free white men of property designed the Bill of Rights in a political process from which they excluded most Americans and all women. Not surprisingly, the Bill of Rights served and serves the interests of such men better than the interests of others. Legal constitutional literature, whether from the right or the left, tends to be celebratory rather than critical. But in looking back on the Bill of Rights during this bicentennial year, women and many men outside the propertied white male class should be ambivalent. In this Article, I assess the Bill of Rights from the per- t Professor of Law, The University of Chicago Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of the Budget April 13, 2021 the Honorable Rick Billinger, Chairperson Senate Committee on Ways and Means Statehouse, R
    Division of the Budget Landon State Office Building Phone: (785) 296-2436 900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 [email protected] Topeka, KS 66612 Division of the Budget http://budget.kansas.gov Adam Proffitt, Director Laura Kelly, Governor April 13, 2021 The Honorable Rick Billinger, Chairperson Senate Committee on Ways and Means Statehouse, Room 545-S Topeka, Kansas 66612 Dear Senator Billinger: SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for SB 289 by Senate Committee on Ways and Means In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning SB 289 is respectfully submitted to your committee. SB 289 would enact the Frontline Service Pay Act. The bill would establish the COVID- 19 Frontline Service Fund within the Department of Commerce. The bill specifies that during FY 2021 and FY 2022, the Director of the Budget would determine the amount of monies received by the state from the Federal Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, public law 116-260, and any other federal law that appropriates funding to Kansas for coronavirus relief aid that are identified as funds that may be expended at the discretion of the state. The Director of the Budget would certify the amount to the Director of Accounts and Reports. If the amount certified is greater than $50.0 million, the Director of Accounts and Reports would transfer $50.0 million of that amount from the identified federal funds to the COVID-19 Frontline Service Fund. The transferred funds would be distributed to eligible employers as determined by the Department of Commerce. Upon receipt of the certification, the Governor may determine an additional amount of monies greater than $50.0 million received by the state from the Federal Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, public law 116-260, and any other federal law that appropriates funding to Kansas for coronavirus relief aid that are identified as funds that may be expended at the discretion of the state to be transferred to the COVID-19 Frontline Service Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Process in Texas the Legislative Process in Texas
    The Legislative Process in Texas The Legislative Process in Texas Published by the Texas Legislative Council February 2021 Texas Legislative Council Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, Joint Chair Speaker Dade Phelan, Joint Chair Jeff Archer, Executive Director The mission of the Texas Legislative Council is to provide professional, nonpartisan service and support to the Texas Legislature and legislative agencies. In every area of responsibility, we strive for quality and efficiency. During previous legislative sessions, the information in this publication was published as part of the Guide to Texas Legislative Information. Copies of this publication have been distributed in compliance with the state depository law (Subchapter G, Chapter 441, Government Code) and are available for public use through the Texas State Publications Depository Program at the Texas State Library and other state depository libraries. This publication can be found at https://www.tlc.texas.gov/publications. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from the council: By mail: P.O. Box 12128, Austin, TX 78711-2128 By phone: (512) 463-1144 By e-mail: [email protected] By online request form (legislative offices only): https://bilreq/House.aspx If you have questions or comments regarding this publication, please contact Kellie Smith by phone at (512) 463-1155 or by e-mail at [email protected]. Table of Contents HOW A BILL ORIGINATES. .1 INTRODUCING A BILL . 1 THE ROLE OF COMMITTEES. .2 REFERRAL TO A COMMITTEE. 2 COMMITTEE MEETINGS. 2 COMMITTEE REPORTS . .3 HOUSE CALENDARS AND LIST OF ITEMS ELIGIBLE FOR CONSIDERATION. 4 SENATE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND INTENT CALENDAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Americans' Love-Hate Relationship with the Bill of Rights Celebrating
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 1991 Americans' Love-Hate Relationship with the Bill of Rights Celebrating the Bicentennial of the Bill of Rights in Honor of the Centennial of the Detroit College of Law: Essay Nadine Strossen New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Recommended Citation 1991 Det. C.L. Rev. 1181 (1991) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. AMERICANS' LOVE-HATE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BILL OF RIGHTS Nadine Strossent Americans' attitude toward the Bill of Rights is paradoxical. On the one hand, we rank it with the American flag and apple pie as a core symbol of national identity and pride. What could be more patriotic, after all, than championing a document that is integral to our government, without which our very Constitution may not have been ratified? Moreover, Americans justifiably are proud of the important world-wide impact that the Bill of Rights recently has been exerting, as an inspiration and model for new movements toward democracy and human rights all over the globe. To celebrate the Bill of Rights' bicentennial in 1991, the Philip Morris Company has been taking one of the remaining original copies of this document on a cross-country tour, and it has attracted large and en- thusiastic audiences everywhere. Americans throughout the land thus seem eager to pay homage to what they apparently regard as a semi-sacred text.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY Page 3 of Fame
    A message from Visit the VACo President National Phillip Bradshaw... Jousting Hall COUNTY Page 3 of Fame ... CONNECTIONS Page 5 Arlington VACo Chairs The Newsletter of the County: Institute was Virginia Association of Counties “We never a huge close”... success ... Page 4 Page 7 March 1, 2010 Oppose E-Verify Bradshaw appoints VACo steering legislation, committee chairs and vice chairs imposes new VACo President Phillip Bradshaw recently appointed chairs and vice mandates on chairs to the association's steering committees. localities hiring Each appointment is for two years. Bradshaw said he was mindful of process maintaining diversity and geographic representation in the new leadership. “The main thing is to have diversity and good representation throughout the state of Virginia,” Bradshaw said. “It’s also important to appoint great leadership because it provides VACo’s steering committees stability for four Willie Gentry, Louisa County supervisor, was appointed chair of the transportation years.” steering committee. Typically, vice chairs are appointed chairs after their two-year term. VACo Vice Chair-Frank Principi, Prince makes it a point to make sure the William By Phyllis Errico appointments are not a closed shop and [email protected] opportunities are available to members Education from all over the state to take on Chair-Annette Perkins, Montgomery Action Please call members of the Senate leadership roles with the association. Vice Chair-Carolyn Barnette, Alleghany Commerce and Labor Committee to Steering committees are the vehicle oppose HB737 (Albo). to address issues affecting Virginia’s 95 Environment & Agriculture counties. The committees also are Chair-Gerald Garber, Augusta extremely important in shaping VACo’s Vice Chair-Janine Burns, Mathews Key information HB737 (Albo) requires agencies of the legislative program that is finalized at Commonwealth and local governments the annual conference in November.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Assembly Bill 5
    2021 - 2022 LEGISLATURE LRB-1510/1 TJD:emw 2021 ASSEMBLY BILL 5 January 19, 2021 - Introduced by Representative SANFELIPPO. Referred to Committee on Health. ***AUTHORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE*** 1 AN ACT relating to: facilitating and prioritizing COVID-19 vaccine distribution. Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is a committee of medical and public health professionals that are selected by the federal Department of Health and Human Services for the purpose of making recommendations on vaccines. If those ACIP recommendations are approved by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, they become the CDC recommendations for vaccination. ACIP has made recommendations on the vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which causes COVID-19, including recommendations on vaccine allocation among prioritized groups. Each state creates its own vaccine allocation plan. This bill requires the Department of Health Services to include in the highest level of priority for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine individuals aged 60 or older. DHS is also required to allow a vaccinator to administer the vaccine to the next level of prioritization based on either the ACIP recommendations or recommendations issued by DHS if the demand on the vaccinator for vaccine has been met at the current prioritization level. For purposes of prioritization, the bill defines who DHS and vaccinators must consider frontline essential workers. Certain pharmacies are part of the federal Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term
    [Show full text]