DOCSLIB.ORG

Doncaster Local Development Framework Green Space Audit (Part One A) Assessment of Provision by Community Profile Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doncaster Local Development Framework Green Space Audit (Part One A) Assessment of Provision by Community Profile Area Doncaster Local Development Framework Green Space Audit (Part One A) Assessment of Provision by Community Profile Area Evidence Base July 2013 WWW.Doncaster.gov.uk/LDF 1 Contents Introduction 2 Background 3 Objectives and Outcomes 3 Methodology 4 Green Space Functions, Benefits 6 Green Space Standards 6 Borough Wide Results Summary (Quantity) 10 Assessment of Supply by Category 10 Assessment of Supply by Community Profile Area 13 Appendix One: Community Profile Area Green Space Audit Provision and Summaries 15 2 Introduction 1) Doncaster covers approximately 226 square miles and is the largest metropolitan borough in the country. The borough has a population of over 290,000 people, all of whom have a right to access nearby good quality green spaces. This revised green space re-audit will provide the council with up to date information on green space location, coverage and provision. It will provide a comprehensive assessment of the current level of provision by community profile area for different types of green space, including formal sports pitches, informal children‟s play spaces, allotments, woodlands and nature conservation areas. The council will for the first time have a comprehensive picture of the provision of all green spaces by community profile area. 2) The re-audit will contribute toward the evidence base required for the Local Development Framework (LDF) Sites and Policies Development Plan Document. It will also be a useful reference document complementing Core Strategy policy (CS17) providing green infrastructure. This document is makes no decisions and provides evidence only. Further work will be required to identify if green spaces are surplus to requirement. 3) „Part two‟ of the green space audit will investigate the quality and value of the sites. Once complete it allow the council to identify priority green spaces, ascertain their formal and informal intended use and allow the council to make strategic decisions on priorities and long term management. It will also look at community profile areas where provision exceeds the defined standards and investigate if green spaces in these areas are surplus to requirement. 4) The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires all local authorities to have up to date information against which decisions can be made. Paragraphs 73 and 74 of the NPPF state: Planning policies should be based on robust and up to date assessment of the needs for open space, sport and recreation facilities and opportunities for new provision. The assessments should identify specific needs and quantitative or qualitative (provision) including deficits or surpluses of open space, sports and recreational facilities in the local area. Information gained from the assessments should be used to determine what open space, sports and recreational provision is required. Existing open space, sports and recreational buildings and land, including playing fields, should not be built on unless: an assessment has been undertaken which has clearly shown the open space, buildings or land to be surplus to requirements; or the loss resulting from the proposed development would be replaced by equivalent or better provision in terms of quantity and quality in a suitable location; or the development is for alternative sports and recreational provision, the needs for which clearly outweigh the loss. 3 Background 5) The 1998 Unitary Development Plan documented and mapped open spaces in the borough. These open space policy areas included amenity areas, playgrounds, playing fields, parks allotments, cemeteries and woodlands in council ownership. In 2001 the council carried out its first comprehensive green space audit which identified over a thousand green spaces, far more than originally thought. The audit was updated in 2007 and provided the background to the currently adopted (but out of date) green space strategy. The re-audit will update and address any anomalies identified in the 2007 audit. It will also address and rationalise the UDP RL1 and RL5 open space policy areas. The revised audit and rationalisation process will result in „open space‟ policy areas which will go on the LDF Proposals Map as the new „open space policy areas‟. 6) The two previous green space audits assessed provision by ward boundary; the new audit is fundamentally different in that it assesses green spaces by the community profiles identified by the local strategic partnership „Doncaster Together‟. The local strategic partnership has identified 88 community profiles, one for each of the communities in the Doncaster area. A wealth of useful information is held in the publicly accessible data observatory for each of these areas. The material held in the observatory paints a picture of what a community is like, identifying; its population, educational attainment, crime levels and health issues. The new audit is an ideal opportunity to provide additional information on green space provision in each of the areas. This can subsequently be used to identify any local correlation between health issues and access to green spaces. Objectives and Outcomes 7) To meet with requirements identified in the NPPF the audit will firstly look at quantity and accessibility and then quality and value. „Part One‟ will: identify and update all green space, sport and recreational facilities providing the evidence to create a new open space policy layer for the LDF Proposals Map establish and agree quantity standards and accessibility isochrones (buffers) for each relevant green space category create a GIS map layer showing the accessibility buffers Identify deficient areas based on agreed quantity standards produce an summary showing green space provision for each of the 88 community profile areas ensure green space is accounted for in the Local Development Framework „Sites and Polices‟ Development Plan Document provide the evidence base to enable scoping the proposals for green space (green infrastructure) contributions for new development proposals produce evidence base document „Assessing and Rationalising RL5 Policy Areas‟ produce evidence base document „Assessing and Rationalising (UDP) RL1 Open Space Policy Area provide a comprehensive evidence base identifying green space provision for use by various organisations within the council 4 Methodology 8) This re-audit will provide a GIS map based database of all green spaces in the borough, including an up-to-date a breakdown of site information by name, identification number, area (Ha), play facilities (MUGA, skate park, play area) if present, and additional site notes if required. Each site has also been categorised by typology as shown below to allow for analysis of provision against adopted standards. Type Name Type Number Allotments 7.3 Amenity (housing) 7.2.6.4 Amenity (other) 7.2.6.5 Amenity (road verge) 7.2.6.1 Campsite (amenity other) 8.4 Cemetery 7.4 Fish ponds (amenity other) 8.1 Formal 7.2.1.1 Formal (school) to add Hayfield and Armthorpe Schools 7.2.1.2 Golf course 8.2 Green corridor 7.2.5 Informal 7.2.2 Marinas and Moorings (amenity other) 8.3 Nature conservation areas 2.2 Public parks 7.2.3 Recreation - other (amenity other) 8.5 Woodland 2.1 Green Space of Local Value 8.6 Category Definitions Type Name Definition Allotments Areas of land, which are cultivated by the public as small plots. They include statutory and non-statutory allotment sites and smallholdings and include all sites irrespective of ownership or management. Amenity (housing, road Amenity areas are public open spaces that improve and verge and other) enhance the appearance of the local environment. Generally, amenity areas are either unsuitable for recreational use or recreational use is prohibited, and as a result they are distinct from informal open space suitable for children‟s play. They include road verges, roundabouts, and amenity areas in housing developments. „Amenity (other)‟ is also an included category to cover areas that provide opportunities for alternative recreational activity (such as model aircraft flying and horse racing) or are council owned and capped landfill sites used for passive recreation such as dog walking. 5 Cemetery A burial ground generally laid out in the form of a park. Churchyards are also included in this category Formal Outdoor sports facilities including pitches, greens, courts and athletics tracks Formal (school) As above but within the education sector which are available for public use through written agreement Golf course Areas laid out for playing the sport of golf Green corridor An area connecting or capable of connecting green spaces to improve green infrastructure and wildlife connectivity. Informal Casual un-equipped playing space within residential areas, or areas for children and young people containing a range of facilities and an environment that has been designed to provide focused opportunities for outdoor play Public parks Areas of land which are public gardens, recreation or pleasure grounds containing walks and facilities for passive or active recreation Nature conservation areas Accessible designated and un-designated wildlife areas Woodland containing habitats that contribute toward local, regional or national biodiversity and provide opportunities for passive and active recreation, and environmental education Local green space A green area close to the local community, which has local significance or community value (see paragraph 77, NPPF) 6 Green Space Functions, Benefits Functions and Benefits 9) There are a wide range of green space benefits which
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geoplace Data Entry Conventions and Best Practice for Streets
    GeoPlace Data Entry Conventions and Best Practice for Streets A Reference Manual DEC-Streets Version 4.1 June 2019 The DEC-Streets version 4.1 is the reference document for the NSG User, street works and Statutory Undertaker communities. DCA-DEC-CG [email protected] Page intentionally blank © GeoPlace™ LLP GeoPlace Data Entry Conventions and Best Practice for Streets (DEC-Streets) Version 4.1, June 2019 Page 2 of 223 Contents Contents Contents ______________________________________________________________________ 3 List of Tables ______________________________________________________________________ 9 List of Figures _____________________________________________________________________10 Related Documents ________________________________________________________________12 Document History _________________________________________________________________13 Policy changes in DEC-Streets Consultation Version 4.1 ____________________________________15 Items under review ________________________________________________________________16 1. Foreword _____________________________________________________________17 2. About this Reference Manual _____________________________________________19 2.1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________19 2.2 Copyright ______________________________________________________________20 2.3 Evaluation criteria _______________________________________________________20 2.4 Definitions used throughout this Reference Manual ____________________________20 2.5 Alphabet, Punctuation and
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Local Delivery Pilot – Phase 3 Report (September 2019)
    Doncaster Local Delivery Pilot Behavioural Insight Work Phase 3 Co-Design Workshops September 2019 December 2018 1 Authors: Dr Rachael Thorneloe, Professor Madelynne Arden, Dr Martin Lamb, Dr Laura Kilby, & Professor Christopher Armitage. Contact: Professor Madelynne Arden Behavioural Science Consortium Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology Sheffield Hallam University Heart of the Campus Collegiate Crescent Sheffield S10 2BQ Telephone: 0114 225 5623 Email: [email protected] 2 Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 4 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Our approach ......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Aims of Phase 3 ..................................................................................................... 8 3. Methodology............................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Ethics ...................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Recruitment ............................................................................................................ 9 3.3 Workshop structure and activities ....................................................................... 11 3.4 Data analysis.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028
    The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028 Creating a Greener, Healthier & more Attractive Borough Adoption Version April 2014 Doncaster Council Service Improvement & Policy (Regeneration & Environment) 0 1 the potential of the Limestone Valley, which runs through the west of the borough. Did you know that Doncaster has 65 different woodlands which cover an area in excess of 521 hectares? That’s about the equivalent to over 1,000 football pitches. There are 88 different formal open spaces across the borough, which include football, rugby and cricket pitches, greens, courts and athletics tracks. Doncaster is also home to 12 golf courses. The Trans-Pennine Trail passes through Doncaster and is integral to the extensive footpath and cycle network that link the borough’s communities with the countryside, jobs and recreation opportunities. There are so Foreword from the many more features across Doncaster and these are covered within this Strategy document. Portfolio Holder… Despite this enviable position that communities in Doncaster enjoy, there is always so much more that can be done to make the borough’s GI even greater. The Strategy sets out a framework As Portfolio Holder for Environment & Waste at for ensuring maximum investment and funding Doncaster Council, I am delighted to introduce is being channelled, both by the Council and the the Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy vast array of important partners who invest so 2014-2028: Creating a Greener, Healthier & much time and resources, often voluntarily, into more Attractive Borough. making our GI as good as it can be. As the largest metropolitan Borough in the This Strategy will help deliver a better country, covering over 220 square miles, connected network of multi-purpose spaces and Doncaster has an extensive green infrastructure provide the opportunity for the coordination (GI) network which includes numerous assets and delivery of environmental improvements and large areas that are rural in character.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Spaces, Green Places
    Green Spaces, Green Places Doncaster’s Greenspace Strategy 2008-11 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................3 1.1 What is Greenspace?.................................................................................5 1.2 Why Does The Council Need A Greenspace Strategy?..........................5 2. SNAPSHOT OF DONCASTER’S GREENSPACE............................................6 3. NATIONAL DRIVERS .......................................................................................7 3.1 Key Local Strategies ..................................................................................7 Doncaster’s Right of Way Improvement Plan ...................................................8 4. VISION...............................................................................................................9 5. DONCASTER’S GREENSPACE PRINCIPLES ..............................................10 6. GREENSPACE PROFILE ...............................................................................10 6. GREENSPACE PROFILE ...............................................................................11 6.1 Audit Findings: Summary.......................................................................11 7. STANDARDS ..................................................................................................11 7.1 Four Acre Standard (Formal) ..................................................................12 7.2 Two Acre Standard (Parks and Gardens) ..............................................12
    [Show full text]
  • CAMDEN STREET NAMES and Their Origins
    CAMDEN STREET NAMES and their origins © David A. Hayes and Camden History Society, 2020 Introduction Listed alphabetically are In 1853, in London as a whole, there were o all present-day street names in, or partly 25 Albert Streets, 25 Victoria, 37 King, 27 Queen, within, the London Borough of Camden 22 Princes, 17 Duke, 34 York and 23 Gloucester (created in 1965); Streets; not to mention the countless similarly named Places, Roads, Squares, Terraces, Lanes, o abolished names of streets, terraces, Walks, Courts, Alleys, Mews, Yards, Rents, Rows, alleyways, courts, yards and mews, which Gardens and Buildings. have existed since c.1800 in the former boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Encouraged by the General Post Office, a street Pancras (formed in 1900) or the civil renaming scheme was started in 1857 by the parishes they replaced; newly-formed Metropolitan Board of Works o some named footpaths. (MBW), and administered by its ‘Street Nomenclature Office’. The project was continued Under each heading, extant street names are after 1889 under its successor body, the London itemised first, in bold face. These are followed, in County Council (LCC), with a final spate of name normal type, by names superseded through changes in 1936-39. renaming, and those of wholly vanished streets. Key to symbols used: The naming of streets → renamed as …, with the new name ← renamed from …, with the old Early street names would be chosen by the name and year of renaming if known developer or builder, or the owner of the land. Since the mid-19th century, names have required Many roads were initially lined by individually local-authority approval, initially from parish named Terraces, Rows or Places, with houses Vestries, and then from the Metropolitan Board of numbered within them.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster – Town Field Conservation Area Appraisal
    Doncaster – Town Field Conservation Area Appraisal www.doncaster.gov.uk/conservationareas Doncaster – Town Field Conservation Area Appraisal Index Preface Part I – Appraisal 1. Introduction 2. Location 3. Origins and development of the settlement 4. Prevailing and former uses and the influence on the plan form and building types 5. Archaeological significance and potential of the area 6. Architectural and historic qualities of the buildings 7. Traditional building materials and details 8. Character and relationship of the spaces in the area 9. Green spaces and trees 10. Negative features 11. Neutral features 12. Condition of buildings 13. Problems, pressures and capacity for change 14. Suggested boundary changes 15. Summary of special interest Part II – Management Proposals 16. Management Proposals Appendices I Useful Information & Contact Details II Relevant Policies of the Doncaster Unitary Development Plan Maps 1. Origin and Development of Area 2. Positive Features 3. Negative and Neutral Features 4. Views into and out of Conservation Area 2 Preface The guidance contained in this document is provided to assist developers and the general public when submitting planning applications. It supplements and expands upon the Policies and Proposals of the Doncaster Unitary Development Plan (UDP) and the emerging policies that will be contained within the Local Development Framework (LDF). The UDP contains both the strategic and the local planning policies necessary to guide development in Doncaster and is used by the Council for development control purposes. At the time of writing this appraisal, the UDP is being reviewed and will ultimately be replaced with the emerging LDF. It is not possible however for the UDP or indeed the future LDF to address in detail all the issues raised by the many types of development.
    [Show full text]
  • HHA Newsletter
    Flying high with Old Boys Triumphant A Level success in batting extravaganza! The Saturday 27th June saw the annual staff versus Old 1912 Boys cricket fixture. Played in hot and sunny conditions, it was always going to be a difficult day for the bowlers and so it proved. The staff batted first and posted a very respectable 218 for 5 off their 25 overs. Following some outstanding batting from the Old Boys (and some questionable fielding and bowling from the staff!) the winning total of 219 was reached with 2 wickets and 7 balls to spare. Pictured is the winning Old Boys team, Edition Number 1 Summer 2015 basking in the sun and glory! As the Sixth Form continues to flourish in numbers, it is wonderful to see Hill House giving young people a helping hand on the road to Welcome from success at the very highest level. (Pictured left to right from last year’s upper sixth are: Emmanuel Victor (A*,A*,A*), Molly Lim (A*,A,A) Grace Stott (A*,A,A), Imogen Hooper (A*, A, A), Henry Cottam (A*,A*,A). the Headmaster It is a great pleasure to see the rebirth of a newsletter dedicated to the old boys and girls of Hill House and St.Mary’s. It is always wonderful to hear from past pupils, to meet at public events and school functions, and to appreciate the warmth that you still feel for your old school. Air Cadet While Hill House continues to thrive, grow and Astro Turf news evolve, it is our overriding aim that we retain the ethos and atmosphere which so many value so much, where a family based community is at the launch Harriet Hickson is pictured on the front row immediately to the right of Phil Brown, and the picture heart of this very special school.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Cycling Map
    6 A 6 N V T O 4 W 3 E B Bentley Moor E A R N H 2 E 8 L O Wood N R M E 2 C TH OA R D A OR D M N L IN W E I D E V S A N P L I V E BO E L EADO F T N IV O A M W IE S U R R N F H E E D T E H F V E L U R BE T E AR I Dunscroft M A R S L O UM EN O LO M L W V N O W C PA A NT A UTTERW R E RK G O L E N Y ORT T R W E Barnby Dun O R AV H UT U S Adwick D U D O A T EN L B Y R B U R AD A E M E WIC S IV A E K LA Common V T E C T NE E F N T A 9 H E U H V C PO 1 E S E A H N E C E R A AVE D I GTON I K T ENNIN R YN IN O K C L N U GSLE A I Y V Adwick Pk E T R E E B V L O N N D A A A A U LA Jun Sch A W D O C E K E L R K Barnby Dun Frickley OOD N E A R U V B E L W A A R T A E N E E S R E V T N A S N N A Common H V E R E C E H A Park Hill N U T A N F T A B D Playing Fields O SB U IN W D U E Almholme Hooton R Y SW Outwood IC A Grange AVENUE ADWICK K R 49 50 51 52 53 W54 55 56 57 Shaftholme 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 L M Town and country maps with hundreds of miles of routes E A A N Academy S N E T E N Grumble Hurst H Pagnell R H LA O I A O G N L R B LE STREET L M R G I OO P L S O T V O North Ridge L O E S O L R L E CLAYT U LAN V N A NE AN L ON L ALK H LA E E A ANE N GE B Community E R TPT SHAFT ME G PO ID E N HOL H C N R D R C D N O Q C E A E L E E A E Lound Hill L L X R S U E N A School T O S U K R RT E N 'S O D N L O T N M D G E A N O E A A S E B N ECT R V R Plantation R E O O N V S L V R ND U O O U L O R O A R A I I Toll Bar R E T A N L A V R O D ENT N M L R T A ESC D Almholme Field I E I G E A V R E D A EW E E O E C N V V T D IV E D I V I T G N S E E R R Prim Sch
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pre-Season Newsletter
    www.yspl.co.uk 2016 Pre-Season Newsletter Welcome to the new Reorganisation of Premier League Yorkshire South cricket in Yorkshire Premier League The launch of the Yorkshire South Premier League is part of a complete reorganisation of Premier Leagues in Yorkshire in 2016. This also sees the introduction of I would like to welcome you to the new Yorkshire South another new Premier League in the north of the Premier League, which will be launched at a clubs meeting county, the Yorkshire Premier League North. The on Wednesday 13 April at Rotherham Phoenix Sports latter, along with the existing North Yorkshire & South Club, with the first league fixtures on Saturday 23 April. Durham League, the Bradford Premier League (including the old Central Yorkshire League), and The new league brings together seven of the former ourselves, will mean that Yorkshire has four Premier Yorkshire League clubs, based in South Yorkshire and Leagues. North Lincolnshire, together with last year’s top four South Yorkshire Senior League clubs and Wakefield Yorkshire CCC Chief Executive Mark Arthur says: “The Thornes, from the Central Yorkshire League. new Premier League structure in Yorkshire has been a long time in the making. At the County Club we are Over the last 18 months, much hard work has gone into anticipating improved competition throughout the laying the foundations for our new league. Change is county, culminating in the play-off semi-finals at never easy, neither is bringing together different cultures Scarborough and Headingley, with the final in Abu against a background of years of tradition and history.
    [Show full text]
  • South Yorkshire Settlement Study Phase 2 Settlements 2005
    Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, Sheffield City Council Transform South Yorkshire South Yorkshire Settlement Assessment Phase 2 Settlements Final Report Copyright Jacobs U.K. Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs U.K. Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs U.K. Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs U.K. Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this report. No liability is accepted by Jacobs U.K. Limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Jacobs U.K. Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs U.K. Limited has been made. May 2005 Jacobs Babtie: 1 City Walk, Leeds, LS11 9DX Tel: 0113 242 6771 Fax: 0113 389 1389 Issue Record Sheet Report Number Issue Date Authors Checker Authorised for Comment No issue by Project Director 1 05 Sept, Martin White, Interim draft issued to 2004 Alan Mitchell of RMBC 2 04 Martin White, 1st Draft Issued to Alan October, Nathan Smith, Mitchell (RMBC), Bob 2004 Nicole Roche Wallens (DMBC) and Peter Rainford (SCC) 3 October 1st Draft Issued to DTZ, 2004 Costas Georgiou of the South Yorkshire Partnership and Wendy Strutt of RMBC 4 16 Nov 2nd Draft Report Issued 2004 to Bob Wallens (DMBC), Alan Mitchell (RMBC), Peter Rainford (SCC), Peter o Brien (Transform).
    [Show full text]
  • Commons and Common Fields Batoche Books
    Commons and Common Fields or The History and Policy of the Laws Relating to Commons and Enclosures in England Being the Yorke Prize Essay of the University of Cambridge for the Year 1886. By Thomas Edward Scrutton Batoche Books Kitchener 2003 Originally published 1887. This edition published 2003. Batoche Books [email protected] Contents Preface. .............................................................................................. 5 Addenda and Errata. .......................................................................... 9 Chapter 1: The Origin of Rights of Common. ................................. 10 Chapter 2: Commons Appendant and Appurtenant......................... 44 Chapter 3: Approvement and the Statute of Merton. ...................... 56 Chapter 4: Sheep and Deer: Enclosures in the 16th Century. ......... 71 Chapter 5: Fens and Forests: Enclosures in the 17th Century. ........ 95 Chapter 6: The Policy of Agricultural Gain: The 18th Century. ... 106 Chapter 7: The Policy of Open Spaces: Modern Legislation. ....... 142 Chapter 8: Needed Reforms. ......................................................... 156 Notes:............................................................................................. 164 Preface. The Yorke Prize of the University of Cambridge, to the establishment of which this work owes its existence, was founded about fourteen years ago by Edmund Yorke, late Fellow of St Catharine’s College, Cambridge, and, under a scheme of the Court of Chancery, is given annually to that graduate of the University,
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Farmsteads
    4.0 Agricultural History and Farm Buildings The existing stock of traditional farm buildings results from centuries of change and development. As a general rule, farmhouses (see 5.1) pre-date farm buildings, even in areas of 18th- and 19th-century enclosure. Larger-scale and higher-status buildings, which were consistently used for the same purpose or capable of being adapted to later uses, generally have the greatest chance of survival. It follows that barns are the overwhelming type of building to have survived from before 1750, and that steadings adapted or built anew in the later 18th and 19th centuries have retained evidence for a greater diversity of functions. Rates of survival differ both regionally and locally, but placing a building within its broad national and historical context will enable decisions on their wider value to be made. 4.1 AN INTRODUCTION TO ENGLISH comprised the foci of farmyards with ancillary buildings AGRICULTURAL HISTORY AND FARM that have been almost completely swept away, for which BUILDINGS:THEIR DEVELOPMENT, documentary but very little archaeological evidence SURVIVAL AND SIGNIFICANCE exists.The great cattle ranches (vaccaries) of the northern uplands have left no traces in terms of built 4.1.1 UP TO 1550 (Figures 10 & 11) fabric, although their impact on the landscape is still The 12th and 13th centuries were characterised by rising legible. Archaeological and documentary records – the population, the colonisation of new land (through the latter particularly after 1350 – are similarly the main drainage of fens, clearance of woods and expansion of source of evidence for the farmsteads of peasant farming on to upland moors) and the direct commercial farmers, and for the emergence of a wealthier class of management by estates of their land, whether this was tenants and freehold farmers from the 13th century.
    [Show full text]