Phylum: Mollusca Conus Platyceras
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Paleozoic Gastropoda from the Moose River Synclinorium, Northern Maine
Paleozoic Gastropoda from the Moose River Synclinorium, Northern Maine GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 503-A Paleozoic Gastropoda from the Moose River Synclinorium, Northern Maine By ARTJiUR J. BOUCOT and ELLIS L. YOCHELSON CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEONTOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 503-A An investigation of fossils primarily of Devonian age UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price 30 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __________________________________________ _ A1 Register of localities ___________________________ -- __ _ A15 Introduction ______________________________________ _ 1 References cited __________________ ---- __ ------------ 17 Occurrence and distribution of the gastropods _________ _ 3 Index ____________________________________________ _ 19 Systematic paleontology ____________________________ _ 3 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates follow index] PLATE 1. Gastropoda and miscellaneous fossils 2-3. Gastropoda Page FIGURE 1. Correlation table______________________ A2 2. Sketch of "Euomphalopterus" __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 17 TABLE Page TABLE 1. Distribution of gastropods in Paleozoic rocks of the Moose River synclinorium ________________ - ____ -- __ ------ A4 III CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEONTOLOGY PALEOZOIC GASTROPODA FROM THE MOOSE RIVER SYNCLINORIUM, NORTHERN MAINE By ARTHUR J. BoucoT and ELLIS L. Y OCHELSON .ABSTRACT units which has been determined from study of other Large-scale collecting in the middle Paleozoic strata of the fossil groups (chiefly brachipods and corals). Moose River synclinorium has yielded a few gastropods-one Except where indicated, the taxonomic classification Ordovician species, six species from the Silurian, and two from follows that published by Knight, Batten, and Y ochel rocks of Silurian or Devonian age, one of these also oceurring son (1960). -
Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles
DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape. -
Lab 5: Mollusks
Geos 223 Introductory Paleontology Spring 2006 Lab 5: Mollusks Name: Section: AIMS: This lab will introduce you to the eutrochozoan protostome phylum Mollusca. You will become familiar with the basic anatomy of the three mollusk groups which are most abundant in the fossil record: gastropods, bivalves, and cephalopods. Emphasis is placed on the various modes of life adopted by different members of each group, and how the form of the organism has been evolutionarily modified to suit each mode. You will also use a computer database to identify “mystery fossils”. By the end of this lab, you should have a good knowledge of the anatomy of the three most diverse groups of mollusks, an appreciation for how organismal form reflects function, and an understanding of how innovations in ecology and anatomy resulted in the evolutionary radiation of each group. INTRODUCTION: Mollusks are unsegmented protostomes with a trochophore larval stage during early development, and are one of the most diverse metazoan phyla. The basic mollusk body plan consists of a muscular foot, a visceral mass (containing the digestive tract and associated organs), a mantle cavity containing gills, a radula for feeding, and a calcareous shell protecting the visceral mass. The shell has a high preservation potential, and mollusks are common in the fossil record. There may be as many as ten classes of mollusks (depending on which text book you read). Each class has modified the basic body plan to some degree, allowing the group to radiate into different ecological niches. We will here focus on just three classes, which are common as fossils and exemplify the evolutionary diversification of mollusks. -
Middle Devonian)
F-l Paleontological Problems of the Hamilton Group (Middle Devonian) H.B. Rollins, N. Eldridge, R.M. Linsley The stratigraphy of the Hamilton Group of the'Middle Devonian of New York State was most recently treated in its entirety by Cooper (1930, 1957). The Hamilton Group of the Chenango Valley (see chart 1) consists primarily of fine clastic sediments and occupies a mid position in this wedge shaped body of rock. In the east the wedge is thickest (about 1,680' in Schoharie Valley (Gruban, 1903, p. 213) and it thins to 285' at Lake Erie in the west (Cooper, 1930, p. 121). In the Chenango Valley the Hamilton Group is 1, 465' thick (op. cit. p. 121) and has a dip to the southwest of 65-75 feet per mile (op. cit. p. 119). The Hamilton Group lies unconformably on the Onondaga Limestone and is overlain unconformably by the Tully Formation. In a very crude sense the Hamilton Group of the Chenango Valley is composed of fine-grained black shales and limestones at the base (the Marcellus Formation) and more clastic units in the upper portion (Skaneateles, Ludlowville and Moscow Formations). However within each of these formations there exists considerable variation from true mud shales through siltstones and up to fine-grained sandstones. The nature of the substrate obviously had a great effect on the faunas associated with them. The black shales are typically associated with a Leiorhynchus fauna, gray shales and siltstones with a Tropidoleptus fauna and the fine-grained sandstones are dominated by bivalves. A more detailed discussion of some of these problems will follow in sections relating to each of the three stops of this trip. -
Chapter 5. Paleozoic Invertebrate Paleontology of Grand Canyon National Park
Chapter 5. Paleozoic Invertebrate Paleontology of Grand Canyon National Park By Linda Sue Lassiter1, Justin S. Tweet2, Frederick A. Sundberg3, John R. Foster4, and P. J. Bergman5 1Northern Arizona University Department of Biological Sciences Flagstaff, Arizona 2National Park Service 9149 79th Street S. Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 3Museum of Northern Arizona Research Associate Flagstaff, Arizona 4Utah Field House of Natural History State Park Museum Vernal, Utah 5Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona Introduction As impressive as the Grand Canyon is to any observer from the rim, the river, or even from space, these cliffs and slopes are much more than an array of colors above the serpentine majesty of the Colorado River. The erosive forces of the Colorado River and feeder streams took millions of years to carve more than 290 million years of Paleozoic Era rocks. These exposures of Paleozoic Era sediments constitute 85% of the almost 5,000 km2 (1,903 mi2) of the Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA) and reveal important chronologic information on marine paleoecologies of the past. This expanse of both spatial and temporal coverage is unrivaled anywhere else on our planet. While many visitors stand on the rim and peer down into the abyss of the carved canyon depths, few realize that they are also staring at the history of life from almost 520 million years ago (Ma) where the Paleozoic rocks cover the great unconformity (Karlstrom et al. 2018) to 270 Ma at the top (Sorauf and Billingsley 1991). The Paleozoic rocks visible from the South Rim Visitors Center, are mostly from marine and some fluvial sediment deposits (Figure 5-1). -
Phylum Mollusca – Class Bivalvia
Phylum Mollusca – Class Bivalvia • Class of marine and fresh water invertebrates with hinged shells • Previously referred to as Pelecypoda (pelecypods) • Includes over 9000 living species (clams, oysters, muscles, scallops) • Majority are filter feeders • Most species bury in sediment to protect from predators, most are modestly mobile, a few like scallops can swim • Shell built of calcium carbonate • Earliest bivalves were in the Cambrian Period Clams are the longest living species on the planet. A clam found in Iceland was 507 years old. Many live 200-300 years. Class Bivalvia 30. Genus Exogyra ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ Phyllum Mollusca – Class Bivalvia (cont.) 31. Genus Gryphaea ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ 32. Genus Pecten ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ 33. Genus Glycymeris ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ Phylum Mollusca – Class Cephalopoda • Squids, octopuses, cuttlefish • Occupy all water depths and all of the world’s oceans, but with -
Multi−Snail Infestation of Devonian Crinoids and the Nature of Platyceratid−Crinoid Interactions
Multi−snail infestation of Devonian crinoids and the nature of platyceratid−crinoid interactions TOMASZ K. BAUMILLER Baumiller, T.K. 2002. Multi−snail infestation of Devonian crinoids and the nature of platyceratid−crinoid interactions. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 47 (1): 133–139. The well−known association of platyceratid snails and crinoids typically involves a single snail positioned on the tegmen of the crinoid host; this has led to the inference of coprophagy. Two specimens of the camerate crinoid Arthroacantha from the Middle Devonian Silica Formation of Ohio, USA, exhibit numerous snails on their tegmens. On one of these, 6 platyceratid juveniles of approximately equal size are found on the tegmen. On the second crinoid, the largest of 7 in− festing platyceratids occupies the typical position over the anal vent while others are either superposed (tiered) upon it or are positioned elsewhere on the tegmen. These specimens illustrate that platyceratids (1) settled on crinoids as spat, (2) were not strictly coprophagous during life yet (3) benefited from a position over the anal vent. Key words: Crinoids, Platyceratids, biotic interactions, Middle Devonian, Silica Formation, Ohio, USA. Tomasz K. Baumiller [[email protected]], Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109−1079, USA. Introduction Review of platyceratid−crinoid association Direct evidence of biotic interactions among extinct organ− isms is rarely preserved in the fossil record, and even when clear evidence for some type of an association exists, inter− Among the first reports and interpretations of the snail− preting its exact nature proves difficult. One of the classic ex− crinoid fossils was that of Austin and Austin (1843: 73) who amples of a biotic interaction involves Paleozoic pelmato− noted that: “Though the Poteriocrinus is chiefly met with in zoan echinoderms (including crinoids, blastoids, cystoids) company with the Productas, other crinoids have been and platyceratid snails (Boucot 1990). -
Phylum Mollusca
Phylum Mollusca – Class Bivalvia • Class of marine and fresh water invertebrates with hinged shells • Previously referred to as Pelecypoda (pelecypods) • Includes over 9000 living species (clams, oysters, muscles, scallops) • Majority are filter feeders • Most species bury in sediment to protect from predators, most are modestly mobile, a few like scallops can swim • Shell built of calcium carbonate • Earliest bivalves were in the Cambrian Period Clams are the longest living species on the planet. A clam found in Iceland was 507 years old. Many live 200-300 years. Class Bivalvia 31. Genus Exogyra ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ __________________________ Phyllum Mollusca – Class Bivalvia (cont.) 32. Genus Gryphaea ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ 33. Genus Pecten ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ 34. Genus Pholadomya ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ Phylum Mollusca – Class Cephalopoda • Squids, octopuses, cuttlefish • Occupy all water depths and all of the world’s oceans, but with -
Mode of Life of Early Devonian Orthonychia Protei (Neritimorpha, Gastropoda) Inferred from Its Post-Larval Shell Ontogeny and Muscle Scars
Mode of life of Early Devonian Orthonychia protei (Neritimorpha, Gastropoda) inferred from its post-larval shell ontogeny and muscle scars JIØÍ FRÝDA, PATRICK R. RACHEBOEUF & BARBORA FRÝDOVÁ Rich fossil material of the Early Devonian Orthonychia protei (Oehlert, 1883) from the Saint Céneré Formation, Brittany (France) provides a unique chance to analyze the infraspecific variability of muscle scars and post-larval shell morphology. The position of the muscle scar in this species depends on the shape of the teleoconch, which seems to be influenced by its living position upon the crinoid host. Individuals having a teleoconch aperture with a pentagonal out- line and five apertural processes probably lived on top of a crinoid calyx and their muscle was attached to the center of their teleoconchs. However, muscle scars are situated more laterally in individuals with irregular teleoconchs lacking apertural processes. The latter group was probably attached to another part of the crinoid body or even to another type of hard substrate. Juvenile post-larval Orthonychia protei was a mobile animal, but very early in its ontogeny became adapted to a fixed position on the crinoid body and remained immobile for the majority of its post-larval ontogeny. Long-term coexistence of Orthonychia protei with the same crinoid suggests that this species had a long-term advantage from such an ecological strategy. However, the existence of individuals with irregularly shaped teleoconchs suggests that Orthonychia protei could also live successfully outside of the digestive openings of crinoids and, thus, use a food source not closely connected with crinoids. This interpretation can be supported by the fact that at least some Silurian and Devonian platyceratids were adapted to living on small firm objects (like empty cephalopod shells) lying on the sed- iment surface. -
Upper Carboniferous Rocks
Bulletin No. 211 Series C, Systematic Geology and Paleontology, 62 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE UPPER CARBONIFEROUS ROCKS OF THE KA.NS.A.S SECTION GEORGE I. ADAMS, GEORGE H. GIRTY, AND DAVID WHITE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1903 Q \: 'i b CON-TENTS. Page. INTRODUCTION, BY GEORGE I. ADAMS.....--.....-.....-.......--.-.--.-.. 13 Present condition of reconnaissance work... --.._.._______.____ 13 Purpose of this report.___...----..------_.----__---_._...._..__ 14 Authority and acknowledgments .._..._.._.___-_.-_..-------- 14 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE REGION, BY GEORGE I. ADAMS-.__..____-..-_-._..-- 15 Methods and materials used in preparing this report _-----_-_____---_- 15 Method of mapping employed .-.--.-._.......---............. 15 Area mapped by Adams.. ------------------------------------ 15 Area mapped by Bennett. ..........^......................... 16 Area mapped by Beede. --_--------_---.--------------.-_--.-- 16 Method of correlation ......-----...--..-.....-_.----------... 16 Rules of nomenclature followed ...................1.......... 17 R6suni6 of previous publications --...-----------.----------------.-.- 17 General mapping of the divisions of the Carboniferous of Kansas.. 17 1858, Hayden ................................................ 17 1862, Hayden .....'.........--...-'.--..- .............. 18 1872, Hayden...............-------------------.---------.--- 18 1877. Kedzie _.-.----.-.--.----------------.'.--------.------.- -
REVISION of the UPPER DEVONIAN in the CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy
REVISION OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN IN THE CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy Roderic Ian Brame Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences Richard K. Bambach, Chair John M. Dennison J. Thomas Dutro, Jr. Kenneth A. Eriksson John Pojeta, Jr. Stephen Scheckler December 16, 2001 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Devonian, Biostratigraphy, Frasnian/Famennian Extinction, Stratigraphy Copyright 2001, Roderic Ian Brame REVISION OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN IN THE CENTRAL-SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BASIN: Biostratigraphy and Lithostratigraphy Roderic Ian Brame (ABSTRACT) The Upper Devonian of the central-southern Appalachians Valley and Ridge province of Virginia lacks stratigraphic resolution, revised formal nomenclature, and detailed biostratigraphic data. Eight of the most complete sections available in a three thousand square mile area were used to build a framework for revising the stratigraphy of the Upper Devonian strata in southwestern Virginia. Detailed lithologic descriptions of about four thousand feet (1.3 km) of rock were made at each outcrop. John Dennison’s (1970 and 1976) nomenclature for the Upper Devonian along the Alleghany Front was successfully tested for it usefulness in Southwestern Virginia and are hereby applied to these rocks. The stratigraphic interval ranges in age from the Middle Devonian to the Lower Carboniferous. The stratigraphic units include the Middle Devonian Millboro Shale, the Upper Devonian Brallier, Scherr, Foreknobs (formally the "Chemung"), Hampshire, and the Lower Carboniferous Price Formation. The Brallier contains two members (Back Creek Siltstone and Minnehaha Springs), the Foreknobs is divided into five members (Mallow, Briery Gap, Blizzard, Pound, and Red Lick), and the lower Price is divided into three members (the Cloyd Conglomerate, Sunbury Shale, and the Ceres). -
NEW PROVIDENCE GROUP Name and Limits
CHAPTER 3. NEW PROVIDENCE GROUP Name and Limits. The name New Providence, from New Providence, Clarke County, Ind., was introduced by Borden17 in 1874. The formation was defined by him as including the lower 80 to 126 feet of the "Knobstone group" of southern Indiana and adjoining parts of Kentucky. The New Providence in southern Indiana and nearby parts of Kentucky is bounded below by the New Albany shale (Ohio shale) and above by the Kenwood sandstone of early Keokuk age, giving it very definite upper and lower limits in the general type region. The same lower limit persists throughout southern Kentucky and northeastward to Berea or Irvine, where the Sunbury shale wedges in between the New Providence and the Ohio shale, The upper limiting formation, however, the Kenwood sandstone, extends southward perhaps only to Lebanon Junction, Bullitt County, Ky. In southern and eastern Kentucky the upper boundary is some one of the higher Mississippian formations which come successively into contact with the New Providence northeastward from Marion County, Ky., to Ohio River, between Vanceburg, Ky., and Portsmouth, Ohio. The New Providence holds its character as a homogeneous unit, although increasing in thickness, from southern Indiana to the vicinity of Lebanon, Ky., where a sandstone is present near the middle. (See section No. 24 of chart and Plate 8.) From Lebanon eastward and northeastward, via Junction City, Brodhead, Irvine, and Morehead, to Ohio River, this sandstone increases in thickness and make up more or less of the upper half of the New Providence (which, in the northeastern counties is four times the thickness of the entire formation in southern Indiana), while the lower half maintains more nearly the lithologic facies of the New Providence at its type locality.