DOCSLIB.ORG

Torture in Healthcare Settings: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’S 2013 Thematic Report TORTURE in HEALTHCARE SETTINGS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Torture in Healthcare Settings: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’S 2013 Thematic Report TORTURE in HEALTHCARE SETTINGS Torture in Healthcare Settings: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s 2013 Thematic Report TORTURE IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS: IN HEALTHCARE TORTURE Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s 2013 Thematic Report Torture’s Reflections on the Special Rapporteur CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW Anti-Torture Initiative Torture in Healthcare Settings: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s 2013 Thematic Report CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW Anti-Torture Initiative ii TORTURE IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s 2013 Thematic Report Table of Contents vii Acknowledgments ix About the Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law and the Anti-Torture Initiative xi About the Mandate of the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture xiii Foreword: Hadar Harris xv Introduction: Juan E. Méndez 1 I. The Prohibition of Torture and the Right to Health: An Overview 3 A Contribution by the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health: Right to Health and Freedom from Torture and Ill-Treatment in Health Care Settings Anand Grover & Jamshid Gaziyev 19 The Problem of Torture in Health Care Tamar Ezer, Jonathan Cohen, Ryan Quinn 43 The U.N. Committee Against Torture and the Eradication of Torture in Health Care Settings Claudio Grossman 49 II. Abusive Practices in Health Care Settings and International Human Rights Law: Reflections 51 Torture or Ill-Treatment in Reproductive Health Care: A Form of Gender Discrimination Luisa Cabal & Amanda McRae 65 Poor Access to Comprehensive Prenatal Care, Including Opiate Substitution Treatment: A Form of Ill-Treatment for Women with Drug Dependence During Pregnancy Mikhail Golichenko & Sandra Ka Hon Chu 73 Consent Signed with Invisible Ink: Sterilization of Trans* People and Legal Gender Recognition Micah Grzywnowicz 83 When Healing and Comforting Hands Turn Hostile and Harmful: Homophobia and Transphobia in Health Care Centers Rafael Mazin 91 Medical Treatment of People with Intersex Conditions as Torture and Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Anne Tamar-Mattis iii iv TORTURE IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s 2013 Thematic Report 105 Torturous “Treatment?” Assessing Government and Donor Responsibilities for Abuses in Drug Detention Centers from a Human Rights Perspective Rebecca Schleifer & Richard Elliott 123 Privatizing Cruelty—Torture, Inhumane and Degrading Treatment in Non-Governmental Drug Rehabilitation Centers Roxanne Saucier & Daniel Wolfe 133 Denial of Pain Treatment and the Prohibition Against Torture and Ill-Treatment Diederik Lohman & Tamar Ezer 141 Joint Statement from the American Psychiatric Association and the World Psychiatric Association in Response to the Report of the Special Rapporteur 151 Response by the Special Rapporteur to the Joint Statement by the American Psychiatric Association and the World Psychiatric Association 155 An International Comparison of Mechanisms in Mental Health Monitoring Judy Laing & Rachel Murray 169 Implementing a Paradigm Shift: Implementing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Context of Mental Disability Law Peter Bartlett 181 Compliance is Unreasonable: The Human Rights Implications of Compliance-Based Behavioral Interventions under the Convention Against Torture and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Lydia Brown 195 “You That Hide Behind Walls:” The Relationship Between the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Convention Against Torture and the Treatment of Institutionalized Forensic Patients Professor Michael L. Perlin & Meredith R. Schriver 219 On Torture, Ill-Treatment and People with Psychosocial and Intellectual Disabilities: Some Thoughts About the Report of the Special Rapporteur Robert Dinerstein 227 A Response to the Report by Juan E. Méndez, Special Rapporteur on Torture, Dealing with Torture in the Context of Health Care, as it Pertains to Nonconsensual Psychiatric Interventions Tina Minkowitz 247 The Role of Global Psychiatry in Advancing Human Rights Oliver Lewis v 263 Torture in Health Care Settings: Urgent Issues and Challenging Questions Yuval Ginbar & James Welsh 277 Legal Capacity, Informed Consent, and Stigmatized Identities: Reform and Remedy Efforts in Central and Eastern Europe Claude Cahn 291 Torture and Ill-Treatment Against African Persons with Psychosocial Disabilities In and Out of Health Care Settings Shuaib Chalklen, Hisayo Katsui, Masa Anisic 299 Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment on Torture in Healthcare Settings Juan E. Méndez vi TORTURE IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s 2013 Thematic Report Acknowledgments This publication was made possible by a grant from Open Society Foundations (OSF), to whom we express our deep appreciation for their generous support. Many people have been involved in bringing this volume to fruition over the past months. We are grateful to the more than 30 article authors who contributed their perspectives and expertise to expand upon the SRT’s report. Their deep commitment to alleviating suffering for those in health care settings (in various dimensions) is inspiring and their important perspectives have enriched the ongoing debates outlined in this work. In addition, we would like to thank Shushan Khachyan for her work on the first phase of this publication, as well as her vital research and support for the drafting of the original SRT report. Special thanks to the skilled editing team, who reviewed all or part of the text at various stages. This includes Naida Henao, Brittany West, Jennifer Ponard, Helen Parks, Paul Jurado, Andrew Crow, Melissa del Aguila, and Lauren Bartlett. Special thanks go to Andra Nicolescu for her excel- lent work in helping editing, organizing and overseeing the publication. We would also like to thank Bill Novak and HBP Printing for overseeing the layout and design of the publication, as well as Aurora Carmichael and Diana Dority of the WCL Office of Grants and Programs, Khalid Khalid, Cathy Prather and Michael Scher of the WCL Finance Department, and Irina Komives of the AU Office of Sponsored Programs for their ongoing support and assistance. And finally, the Center owes a deep debt of gratitude to Maria Noel Leoni Zardo, Coordinator of the Center’s Anti-Torture Initiative, for her close stewardship of this volume, including her review of the articles, coordination of the editing team, close communication with authors and interactions with the publishers. Without her tireless efforts, this volume could not have been completed. Disclaimer The ideas, opinions and conclusions expressed in this volume are those of the authors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of the American University Washington College of Law Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law, the United Nations, the UN Special Rapporteurship on Torture or the Open Society Foundations. This publication is intended to generate a broad discussion on the matter of abusive practices in health care settings. For that reason, it may be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and trans- lated, in part or in whole, but it is not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. Any changes to the text of this publication must be approved by the Anti-Torture Initiative (ATI) of the Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law of American University Washington College of Law. If any section is reproduced, due credit must be given to the Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law Anti-Torture Initiative and to this publication. vii viii TORTURE IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS: Reflections on the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s 2013 Thematic Report About the Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law and the Anti-Torture Initiative Established in 1990, the Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law explores emerging intersections in the law and seeks to create new tools and strategies for the creative advancement of international human rights norms through work with students, academics and practitioners. The Center runs a variety of projects, conferences and workshops on issues ranging from combating torture, enhancing the human rights of persons with disability, promoting human rights in the US, building capacity and strategies for human rights education, seeking solutions to promote human rights in business and more. The Center seeks to enhance the understanding and implementation of human rights and humanitarian law globally. The Center’s Anti-Torture Initiative (ATI) was created in 2012 to expand the strategies used by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (SRT) in furtherance of its mandate; to support, monitor, and assess implementation of the SRT’s recommendations; and to provide a multi-dynamic model for effective thematic and country-specific follow-up. The ATI employs diverse methodology and best-practices to develop comprehensive thematic and country-specific follow up initiatives, with the aim of facilitating the domestic implementation of the SRT’s recommendations, and helping to promote the complete elimination of torture. The ATI is an independent project but works closely with the SRT and the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, as well as with civil society organizations and government representatives in selected countries to engage with the SRT in follow-up activ- ities, and to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Global Race for Farmland and the Rights of Land Users
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLI\52-2\HLI204.txt unknown Seq: 1 7-JUN-11 9:40 Volume 52, Number 2, Summer 2011 The Green Rush: The Global Race for Farmland and the Rights of Land Users Olivier De Schutter Table of Contents Introduction .............................................. 504 R I. The Relationship between States and Markets in Agriculture: A Brief History ...................... 508 R II. The New Competition for Land .................... 520 R III. The Threats to the Rights of Land Users ......... 524 R A. The Protection of Land Users from Eviction: Two Approaches to Security of Tenure ................................ 525 R B. Protecting Communal Rights ......................... 533 R C. The Decentralized Management of Natural Resources ..... 538 R IV. Choices facing Governments: Three Scenarios..... 540 R A. The Transition Scenario.............................. 540 R B. The Coexistence Scenario ............................. 543 R C. The Reform Scenario ................................ 548 R V. Conclusion ......................................... 556 R \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLI\52-2\HLI204.txt unknown Seq: 2 7-JUN-11 9:40 504 Harvard International Law Journal / Vol. 52 The Green Rush: The Global Race for Farmland and the Rights of Land Users Olivier De Schutter* The increased volatility of prices of agricultural commodities on international markets and the merger between the energy and food commodities markets have led to a sudden surge of interest in the acquisition or lease of farmland in developing countries. The result is “land-grabbing”: a global enclosure movement in which large areas of arable land change hands through deals often negotiated between host governments and foreign investors with little or no participation from the local communities who depend on access to those lands for their livelihoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and the Violence(S) of War and Armed Conflict EMERALD STUDIES in CRIMINOLOGY, FEMINISM and SOCIAL CHANGE
    Gender and the Violence(s) of War and Armed Conflict EMERALD STUDIES IN CRIMINOLOGY, FEMINISM AND SOCIAL CHANGE Series Editors Sandra Walklate, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Australia. Kate Fitz-Gibbon, School of Social Sciences at Monash University and Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre, Australia. Jude McCulloch, Monash University and Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre, Australia. JaneMaree Maher, Centre for Women’s Studies and Gender Research, Sociology, Monash University, Australia. Emerald Studies in Criminology, Feminism and Social Change offers a platform for innovative, engaged, and forward-looking feminist-informed work to explore the interconnections between social change and the capacity of criminology to grap- ple with the implications of such change. Social change, whether as a result of the movement of peoples, the impact of new technologies, the potential consequences of climate change, or more commonly identified features of changing societies, such as ageing populations, inter-genera- tional conflict, the changing nature of work, increasing awareness of the problem of gendered violence(s), and/or changing economic and political context, takes its toll across the globe in infinitely more nuanced and inter-connected ways than previously imagined. Each of these connections carry implications for what is understood as crime, the criminal, the victim of crime and the capacity of criminology as a disci- pline to make sense of these evolving interconnections. Feminist analysis, despite its contentious relationship with the discipline of criminology, has much to offer in strengthening the discipline to better understand the complexity of the world in the twenty-first century and to scan the horizon for emerging, possible or likely futures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chartering of Europe
    Erik Oddvar Eriksen/John Erik Fossum/ Agustín José Menéndez (eds.) The Chartering of Europe The European Charter of Fundamental Rights and its Constitutional Implications Nomos Verlagsgessellschaft Baden-Baden Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie ; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddn.de abrufbar Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de ISBN 3-8329-0162-0 1. Auflage 2003-12-08 © Nomos Verlagsgessellschaft, Baden-Baden 2003. Printed in Germany. Alle Rechte, auch die Nachdrucks von Auszügen, der photomechanischen Wiedergrabe und der Übersetzung, vorbehalten. Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständingem Papier. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illus- trations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machine or similar means, and storage in data banks. Under §54 of the German Copyright Law where copies are made for other than private use, a fee is payable to “Werwertungsgesellschaft Wort”, Munich Contents Foreword Neil MacCormick 9 1. The Charter in Context Erik Oddvar Eriksen, John Erik Fossum, and Agustín José Menéndez 17 Section I: Why a Charter? 2. Finalité Through Rights Agustín José Menéndez 30 3. Why a Constitutionalised Bill of Rights Erik Oddvar Eriksen 48 4. The Law Beneath Rights’ Feet Law, Politics and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union Massimo La Torre 71 5. The Canadian Experience of a Charter of Rights Alan C.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Procedure Mandate-Holders Presenting to the Third Committee
    GA66 Third Committee Subject to change – Status as of 7 October 2011 Special procedure mandate-holders, Chairs of human rights treaty bodies or Chairs of Working Groups presenting reports Monday, 10 October (am) • Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Ms. Silvia Pimentel – oral report and interactive dialogue. • Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms. Rashida MANJOO report and interactive dialogue. Wednesday, 12 October (pm) • Chair of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Mr. Jean Zermatten, – oral report. • Special Representative of the Secretary-General on violence against children, Ms. Marta SANTOS PAIS. • Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, Ms. Najat M’jid MAALLA. Monday, 17 October (am) • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people, Mr. James ANAYA. Tuesday, 18 October (am) • Chair of the Committee against Torture, Mr. Claudio GROSSMAN – oral report and interactive dialogue. • Chair of the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture, Mr. Malcolm David Evans – oral report and interactive dialogue. • Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of punishment, Mr. Juan MENDEZ Wednesday, 19 October (pm) • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Iran, Mr. Ahmed SHAHEED. • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, Mr. Tomas Ojea QUINTANA. • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Mr. Marzuki DARUSMAN. Thursday, 20 October (am) • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order in Spanish
    Naciones Unidas A/HRC/30/44 Asamblea General Distr. general 14 de julio de 2015 Español Original: inglés Consejo de Derechos Humanos 30º período de sesiones Tema 3 de la agenda Promoción y protección de todos los derechos humanos, civiles, políticos, económicos, sociales y culturales, incluido el derecho al desarrollo Informe del Experto Independiente sobre la promoción de un orden internacional democrático y equitativo, Alfred-Maurice de Zayas* Resumen El presente informe aborda los efectos adversos para los derechos humanos de los acuerdos internacionales de inversión, los tratados bilaterales de inversión y los acuerdos multilaterales de libre comercio en el orden internacional, tanto en los aspectos de procedimiento, en relación con su elaboración, negociación, aprobación y aplicación, como en cuanto al fondo, examinando su constitucionalidad y sus efectos en la gobernanza democrática, incluido el ejercicio de las funciones reguladoras del Estado para promover el goce de los derechos civiles, culturales, económicos, políticos y sociales. Se reclama un examen ex ante y una evaluación ex post de los efectos para los derechos humanos, la salud y el medio ambiente y se propone un plan de acción para lograr un cambio sistémico. Puesto que todos los Estados están obligados por la Carta de las Naciones Unidas, todos los tratados deben ser conformes con ella, en particular con sus Artículos 1, 2, 55 y 56. Al tiempo que se reconoce que la globalización puede contribuir a los derechos humanos y el desarrollo, la experiencia sugiere que a menudo los derechos humanos se han subordinado a los dogmas del fundamentalismo del mercado, al estar orientada la actividad a la obtención de beneficios más que al desarrollo sostenible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Systematic Use of Sexual Violence in Genocide — Understanding Why Women Are Being Targeted Using the Cases of Rwanda and the Former Yugoslavia ! ! !
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! The systematic use of sexual violence in genocide — understanding why women are being targeted using the cases of Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia ! ! ! Author: Viktoria Nicolaisen Supervisor: Dr. Minoo Koefoed, Gothenburg University May 29, 2019 ! ! This thesis is submitted for obtaining the Master’s Degree in International Humanitarian Action and Conflict. By submitting the thesis, the author certifies that the text is from her hand, does not include the work of someone else unless clearly indicated, and that the thesis has been produced in accordance with proper academic practices. Abstract When describing sexual violence as a ’weapon of war’ or as systematic in the setting of a conflict, many times there is no distinction between how it is used during different types of conflicts. Moreover, they are often discussed as either a crime against the ”enemy” or a crime against women. This research seeks to describe sexual violence during the genocides of Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia and to find whether there is an underlying genocidal intent. It also aims to emphasize the intersectional nature of such crimes — the targeting of a woman on the basis of both gender and group belonging. ! With the use of books, journal and research articles, reports and interview transcripts — this paper is based on a qualitative research method aiming to describe the underlying intent of the strategic use of sexual violence targeting women in genocide. It is the interpretation of the gathered material and theories which enables the discussion to take form. The genocidal intent behind rapes and sexual violence is not only to use women as reproductive vessels, prevent births within a group and inflict such injuries that would make a woman suffer and become less worthy in her community — but also to humiliate a group through sexual violence in a way that fragments it into elimination.
    [Show full text]
  • The Body Weaponized
    SDI0010.1177/0967010619895663Security DialogueKirby 895663research-article2020 Special issue on Becoming War Security Dialogue 2020, Vol. 51(2-3) 211 –230 The body weaponized: War, sexual © The Author(s) 2020 Article reuse guidelines: violence and the uncanny sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619895663DOI: 10.1177/0967010619895663 journals.sagepub.com/home/sdi Paul Kirby London School of Economics and Political Science, UK Abstract It is today common to argue that rape is a weapon, tool or instrument of warfare. One implication is that armed groups marshal body parts for tactical and strategic ends. In this article, I interrogate this discourse of embodied mobilization to explore how body weaponry has been made intelligible as a medium for sexual violence. First, I show that, despite wide rejection of essentialist models, the penis and penis substitutes continue to occupy a constitutive role in discussions of sexual violence in both political and academic fora, where they are often said to be like weapons, a tendency I term ‘weapon talk’. Second, I trace the image of the body weapon in key threads of feminist theorizing and commentary, to show how the penis has appeared as a ‘basic weapon of force’ in various permutations. Third, I explore the weaponization of the body as it appears in military thought and in the cultural circulation of ideas about the soldiering body in which sexual pleasure and violence are frequently conflated. Building on this foundation, I propose that these literatures collectively describe an uncanny weapon object, and I draw out the significance of this term for feminist security studies and martial empiricism.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Surrounding Rape and Sexual Torture of Men in Conflict Situations
    Compromised Masculinities: Issues Surrounding Rape and Sexual Torture of Men in Conflict Situations by Tina A. Sorensen A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Sociology University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2011 by Tina A. Sorensen Abstract This thesis explores media reporting on wartime sexual violence against men, set against commonly-held notions of gender and masculinity, to uncover how male sexual victimization is constructed and discussed. A discourse analysis of several daily newspapers was conducted. Findings show that there was little sustained discussion to analyse; martial sexual violence against men was referred to more often than expected, but descriptions were fleeting and limited in terms of the information provided. An examination of media reporting on female rape during conflicts emerged from this analysis, and we see a clear difference in the way the media reports about sexual victimization of male and female victims. It was concluded that the way in which male and female sexual victimization is reported is influenced and shaped by gender stereotypes, contains gendered language, and contributes to the perpetuation of both male and female rape myths. 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my committee members for their assistance and advice, most notably their great effort, and the time they took out of their busy schedules to help me in completing this thesis. I thank Professor Adam Muller (external) Department of English, Film and Theatre, Professor Tami Jacoby (external) Department of Political Studies, Professor Christopher Powell (internal) Department of Sociology, and Professor Andrew Woolford (advisor) Department of Sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. UN and Regional Special Procedures
    Appendix K: UN and Regional Special Procedures Appendix K. UN and Regional Special Procedures UN Special Procedures Special Procedure Name Contact / Special instructions Independent Expert on minority Ms. Rita Izsák [email protected] issues Tel: +41 22 917 9640 Independent Expert on human Ms. Virginia Dandan [email protected] rights and international Telephone: (41-22) 928 9458 solidarity Fax: (+41-22) 928 9010 Independent Expert on the effects Mr. Cephas Lumina [email protected] of foreign debt Independent Expert on the issue Mr. John Knox [email protected] of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment Independent Expert on the Mr. Alfred de Zayas [email protected] promotion of a democratic and equitable international order Independent Expert on the Mr. Shamsul Bari [email protected] situation of human rights in Somalia Independent Expert on the Mr. Mashood Baderin [email protected] situation of human rights in the Sudan Independent Expert on the Mr. Doudou Diène [email protected] situation of human rights in Côte d’Ivoire Independent Expert on the Mr. Gustavi Gallón [email protected] situation of human rights in Haiti Special Rapporteur in the field of Ms. Farida Shaheed [email protected] cultural rights Telephone: (41-22) 917 92 54 Special Rapporteur on adequate Ms. Raquel Rolnik [email protected] housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living Special Rapporteur on Mr. Mutuma Ruteere [email protected] contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance Special Rapporteur on Ms. Gulnara Shahinian [email protected] contemporary forms of slavery, Special form: including its causes and its http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Is consequences sues/Slavery/SR/AFslavery_en.do c K-1 Appendix K: UN and Regional Special Procedures Special Procedure Name Contact / Special instructions Special Rapporteur on Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroecology and the Right to Food
    INTERVIEW – OLIVIER DE SCHUTTER Photo: Joyce Fabriek Oliver De Schutter speaks about sustainable food systems at a conference in Wageningen, Agroecology and the the Netherlands confusion arises because we calculate output only by looking at right to food the commodities that these large farms deliver. And yes, they are productive, but small farms combine different outputs and are much more efficient in the way they use resources. Taking into account Interview: Margriet Goris all the different products, yields from a small farm can be very impressive. The key problem is that we have developed a situation with industrial farming systems where we have become addicted “Agroecology is really common sense. It means to fossil fuels and have accelerated greenhouse gas emissions as a understanding how nature works, to replicate the natural result. Food systems have become highly dependent on petrol, but workings of nature on farms in order to reduce dependency we’re running out of oil. So, in the future they may not be on external inputs. Agroecology preserves the ability for sustainable. We need alternatives, and there are good arguments from the points of view of resource efficiency and resilience to future generations to feed themselves. I believe we should support food systems that are much more agroecological and make teach more about agroecology and encourage exchanges much better use of our natural resources. between farmers. We cannot continue in this impasse of How is agroecology linked to the right to food? an oil dependent food production system.” First, agroecology is not the same as organic agriculture. It means understanding how nature works, to replicate the complementarities s the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to between plants, trees and animals and the natural workings of nature Food (2008-14), Olivier De Schutter has spoken out many on your farm in order to reduce dependency on external inputs times on the urgent need for changes in global food A such as chemical fertilizer.
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations
    ACCOUNTABILITY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS ACCOUNTABILITY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS Jan Wouters Eva Brems Stefaan Smis Pierre Schmitt (eds.) Antwerp – Oxford – Portland Distribution for the UK: Distribution for the USA and Canada: Hart Publishing Ltd. International Specialized Book Services 16C Worcester Place 920 NE 58th Ave. Suite 300 Oxford OX1 2JW Portland, OR 97213 UK USA Tel.: +44 1865 51 75 30 Tel.: +1 800 944 6190 (toll free) Email: [email protected] Tel.: +1 503 287 3093 Email: [email protected] Distribution for Austria: Distribution for other countries: Neuer Wissenschaft licher Verlag Intersentia Publishers Argentinierstraße 42/6 Groenstraat 31 1040 Wien 2640 Mortsel Austria Belgium Tel.: +43 1 535 61 03 24 Tel.: +32 3 680 15 50 Email: offi [email protected] Email: [email protected] Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations Jan Wouters, Eva Brems, Stefaan Smis and Pierre Schmitt (eds.) © 2010 Intersentia, the editors and the authors Antwerp – Oxford – Portland www.intersentia.com ISBN 978-90-5095-746-5 D/2010/7849/128 NUR 828 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfi lm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS Contents . ix Abbreviations . xxi Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations: Introductory Remarks Jan Wouters, Eva Brems, Stefaan Smis and Pierre Schmitt . 1 PART I. GENERAL CONCEPTS Accountability of International Organisations: An Evolving Legal Concept? Ige F. Dekker . 21 International Organisations as Independent Actors: Sweet Memory or Functionally Necessary? Niels M. Blokker .
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Orang-Utan Sleep Architecture: Sleeping Platform Complexity Increases Sleep Quality in Captive Pongo
    Behaviour 150 (2013) 845–861 brill.com/beh Documenting orang-utan sleep architecture: sleeping platform complexity increases sleep quality in captive Pongo David R. Samson a,∗ and Robert W. Shumaker a,b,c a Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA b Indianapolis Zoo, 1200 W Washington Street, Indianapolis, IN 46222, USA c Krasnow Institute at George Mason University, 4400 University Dr Fairfax, VA 22030, USA *Corresponding author’s e-mail address: [email protected] Accepted 29 March 2013 Abstract Of the extant primates, only 20 non-human species have been studied by sleep scientists. Notable sampling gaps exist, including large-bodied hominoids such as gorillas (Gorilla gorilla), orang- utans (Pongo spp.) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), for which data have been characterized as high priority. Here, we report the sleep architecture of three female and two male orang-utans housed at the Indianapolis Zoo. Sleep states were identified by scoring correlated behavioural signatures (e.g., respiration, gross body movement, muscle atonia, random eye movement, etc.). The captive orang-utans were focal subjects for a total of 70 nights (1013 h) recorded. We found that orang- utans slept an average of 9.11 h (range 5.85–11.2 h) nightly and were characterized by an average NREM of 8.03 h (range 5.47–10.2 h) and REM of 1.11 (range: 0.38–2.2 h) per night. In addition, using a sleeping platform complexity index (SPCI) we found that individuals that manufactured and slept in more complex beds were characterized by higher quality sleep. Sleep fragmentation (the number of brief awakenings greater than 2 min per hour), arousability (number of motor activity bouts per hour), and total time awake per night were reduced by greater quality sleep environments.
    [Show full text]