Mir-106B-Responsive Gene Landscape Identifies Regulation of Kruppel- Like Factor Family

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mir-106B-Responsive Gene Landscape Identifies Regulation of Kruppel- Like Factor Family bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/088229; this version posted November 17, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. miR-106b-responsive gene landscape identifies regulation of Kruppel- like factor family Cody J. Wehrkamp Sathish Kumar Natarajan Ashley M. Mohr Mary Anne Phillippi Justin L. Mott Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha Running title: miR-106b-responsive genes in cholangiocarcinoma Key words: Apoptosis, biliary tract cancer, KLF2, KLF4, KLF6, KLF10, KLF11, KLF13, LKLF, lung Kruppel-like factor, miR-106a, miRNA, next-generation sequencing Address for Correspondence: Justin L. Mott, MD, PhD Associate Professor Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 985870 Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, NE 68198-5870 Tel: 402-559-3177 Fax: 402-559-6650 e-mail: [email protected] List of abbreviations: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, MTT; 4′,6-diamidine-2′- phenylindole dihydrochloride, DAPI; Crosslinking, ligation, and sequencing of hybrids, CLASH; Death receptor-5, DR5; Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium, DMEM; False discovery rate, FDR; Fetal bovine serum, FBS; Kruppel-like factor, KLF; Locked-nucleic acid, LNA; Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, qRT-PCR; Sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, SDS-PAGE; Untranslated region, UTR; bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/088229; this version posted November 17, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. miR-106b-responsive gene landscape identifies regulation of Kruppel-like factor family Abstract: MicroRNA dysregulation is a common feature of cancer and due to the promiscuity of microRNA binding this can result in a wide array of genes whose expression is altered. miR- 106b is an oncomiR overexpressed in cholangiocarcinoma and its upregulation in this and other cancers often leads to repression of anti-tumorigenic targets. The goal of this study was to identify the miR-106b-regulated gene landscape in cholangiocarcinoma cells using a genome- wide, unbiased mRNA analysis. Through RNA-Seq we found 112 mRNAs significantly repressed by miR-106b. The majority of these genes contain the specific miR-106b seed- binding site. We have validated 11 genes from this set at the mRNA level and demonstrated regulation by miR-106b of five proteins. Combined analysis of our miR-106b-regulated mRNA data set plus published reports indicate that miR-106b binding is anchored by G:C pairing in and near the seed. Novel targets Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) and KLF6 were verified both at the mRNA and at the protein level. Further investigation showed regulation of four other KLF family members by miR-106b. We have discovered coordinated repression of several members of the KLF family by miR-106b that may play a role in cholangiocarcinoma tumor biology. Introduction microRNA which is vital for complementary binding to its mRNA target. The miR-106b has been established as an complementary seed-binding site is more or oncogenic microRNA with increased less conserved among targets, allowing for expression in many cancers including broad transcript-expression dampening cholangiocarcinoma [1-5], prostate [6], effects from a single microRNA. Seed- gastric [7], and hepatocellular carcinoma [8]. binding sites are highly enriched in the 3’ Some functions of miR-106b include untranslated region (UTR) of transcripts increased proliferation by miR-106b- [17]. There is also evidence that supports mediated reduction of the transcription non-canonical, non-seed mRNA target factor E2F1 [9] and the tumor suppressor interactions between microRNAs and their RB1 [10]. Additionally, miR-106b increased targets [18, 19]. The traditional seed for migration through targeting of the miR-106b is located at nucleotides 1-8 on phosphatase PTEN [11], and reduced its 5’ end, corresponding to the microRNA apoptosis by regulating the BH3-containing sequence 5’UAAAGUGC. protein Bim [12]. In this study, we sought to define the MicroRNAs function to dampen the genome-wide target set of miR-106b and expression of their targets [13-15]. This is found that miR-106b binding relied on accomplished both through reduction in sequences between bases 2-10, tolerating a mRNA transcript level as well as by G:U wobble in the seed region. We found repression of translation. While both 112 transcripts that were regulated at the mechanisms contribute to reduced target mRNA level in cholangiocarcinoma cells. protein expression, the effect of mRNA Finally, we demonstrated that members of reduction may dominate [16], in part the KLF family of transcription factors are because each message is used as a coordinately repressed by miR-106b. transcript for synthesis of many protein Comparison of our data in molecules; still, the magnitude of change in cholangiocarcinoma cells with data in Flp-In mRNA expression is low. A focused T-REx 293 human embryonic kidney- description of the binding characteristics derived cells [19] revealed that the and targets of individual microRNAs is microRNA-responsive gene set is largely feasible and desirable. cell-type specific. The seed region of a microRNA is a 7-8 nucleotide sequence at the 5’ end of the bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/088229; this version posted November 17, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Materials and Methods Sequences were analyzed by the Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Core at Cell lines: Human cholangiocarcinoma cell the University of Nebraska Medical Center lines were previously derived from a female (UNMC) using the Tuxedo protocol [23]. patient with metastatic gallbladder cancer, Reads were mapped to the human genome Mz-ChA-1 [20], or a male patient with using Top Hat. Transcripts were assigned combined histologic features of by Cuff links and the transcriptome defined hepatocellular carcinoma and using Cuffmerge. Finally, differential cholangiocarcinoma, KMCH [21]. BDEneu expression between miR-106b and LNA- rat cholangiocarcinoma cells were derived 106b was calculated with Cuffdiff. from primary Fisher 344 rat cholangiocytes [22]. H69 cells are a non-malignant Using a false discovery rate (FDR)- immortalized cholangiocyte cell line. corrected p value, genome-wide transcripts Cholangiocarcinoma cells were grown in were ranked from most significant to least. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium This ranked list of genes was submitted to (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal the SylArray online server to detect bovine serum (FBS), insulin (0.5 µg/mL) enrichment of microRNA seed-binding sites and G418 (50 µg/mL). H69 cells were [24]. grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% miR-106b binding site analysis: RefSeq FBS, insulin (5 µg/mL), adenine (24.3 sequences for the 129 significant genes µg/mL), epinephrine (1 ug/mL), tri- (112 decreased and 17 increased) were iodothyronine (T3)- transferrin (T), [T3- 2.23 collected in Fasta format and analyzed by ng/ml, T-8.19 µg/mL], epidermal growth direct search for the known miR-106b factor (9.9 ng/mL) and hydrocortisone (5.34 binding site as well as subjected to k-mer µg/mL). analysis to generate a k table of all possible Cells were transfected either with mature 7-mer and 8-mer sequences and their miR-106b mimic (Life Technologies), frequency in this gene set. Several genes locked-nucleic acid (LNA) antagonist to had more than one RefSeq sequence, so miR-106b, LNA-106b (Exiqon), or LNA the final size of this Fasta file was 191 Negative Control A (Exiqon) for 24-48 hours transcripts. For comparison, 1,000 random using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX at a final sets of 191 transcripts each from the oligonucleotide concentration of 20 nM. RefSeq database were generated. miR-106b levels were quantified by TaqMan RNAHybrid [25] was used to identify the Small RNA assay (Life Technologies). single best miR-106b predicted binding site RNA-Seq: High quality total RNA was for each decreased transcript based on extracted from Mz-ChA-1 cells transfected minimum free energy hybridization. The with either miR-106b (n=3) or LNA-106b resulting miR-106b-binding sites were (n=3) for RNA-Seq using RNeasy Mini Kit manually curated for discovery of ungapped (Qiagen). The quality of the RNA was motifs using MEME Suite [26]. confirmed by RNA Integrity Analysis using Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR: an Agilent Bioanalyzer. RNA sequencing Total RNA for qRT-PCR was isolated using libraries were prepared by the UNMC Next TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) and Generation Sequencing Core Facility quantified using SYBR Green DNA binding beginning with 1 µg of total RNA and a (Roche). Primer pairs are listed in Table 1. TruSeq RNA Prep V2 (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA). Samples were sequenced MicroRNA biotinylation: Biotinylation of Cel- using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 system with miR-67 and miR-106b was performed as 100 bp paired-end reads. An average of described [27]. Mature microRNA for C. 76.99 million reads per sample were elegans miR-67 (control) and H. sapiens collected (range 58.99-87.00 million). miR-106b (both leading and passenger bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/088229; this version posted November 17, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Recommended publications
  • Whole Brain and Brain Regional Coexpression Network Interactions Associated with Predisposition to Alcohol Consumption Lauren A
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Study of Biological Complexity Publications Center for the Study of Biological Complexity 2013 Whole Brain and Brain Regional Coexpression Network Interactions Associated with Predisposition to Alcohol Consumption Lauren A. Vanderlinden University of Colorado at Aurora Laura M. Saba University of Colorado at Aurora Katerina Kechris University of Colorado at Aurora See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/csbc_pubs Part of the Life Sciences Commons © 2013 Vanderlinden et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Downloaded from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/csbc_pubs/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for the Study of Biological Complexity at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Study of Biological Complexity Publications by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Lauren A. Vanderlinden, Laura M. Saba, Katerina Kechris, Michael F. Miles, Paula L. Hoffman, and Boris Tabakoff This article is available at VCU Scholars Compass: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/csbc_pubs/24 Whole Brain and Brain Regional Coexpression Network Interactions Associated with Predisposition to Alcohol Consumption Lauren
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1. List of Proteins in the BAHD1 Interactome
    Table S1. List of proteins in the BAHD1 interactome BAHD1 nuclear partners found in this work yeast two-hybrid screen Name Description Function Reference (a) Chromatin adapters HP1α (CBX5) chromobox homolog 5 (HP1 alpha) Binds histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 and chromatin-associated proteins (20-23) HP1β (CBX1) chromobox homolog 1 (HP1 beta) Binds histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 and chromatin-associated proteins HP1γ (CBX3) chromobox homolog 3 (HP1 gamma) Binds histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 and chromatin-associated proteins MBD1 methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1 Binds methylated CpG dinucleotide and chromatin-associated proteins (22, 24-26) Chromatin modification enzymes CHD1 chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 1 ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activity (27-28) HDAC5 histone deacetylase 5 Histone deacetylase activity (23,29,30) SETDB1 (ESET;KMT1E) SET domain, bifurcated 1 Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase activity (31-34) Transcription factors GTF3C2 general transcription factor IIIC, polypeptide 2, beta 110kDa Required for RNA polymerase III-mediated transcription HEYL (Hey3) hairy/enhancer-of-split related with YRPW motif-like DNA-binding transcription factor with basic helix-loop-helix domain (35) KLF10 (TIEG1) Kruppel-like factor 10 DNA-binding transcription factor with C2H2 zinc finger domain (36) NR2F1 (COUP-TFI) nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group F, member 1 DNA-binding transcription factor with C4 type zinc finger domain (ligand-regulated) (36) PEG3 paternally expressed 3 DNA-binding transcription factor with
    [Show full text]
  • Proteomic Analysis of the Venom of Jellyfishes Rhopilema Esculentum and Sanderia Malayensis
    marine drugs Article Proteomic Analysis of the Venom of Jellyfishes Rhopilema esculentum and Sanderia malayensis 1, 2, 2 2, Thomas C. N. Leung y , Zhe Qu y , Wenyan Nong , Jerome H. L. Hui * and Sai Ming Ngai 1,* 1 State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] 2 Simon F.S. Li Marine Science Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] (Z.Q.); [email protected] (W.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.H.L.H.); [email protected] (S.M.N.) Contributed equally. y Received: 27 November 2020; Accepted: 17 December 2020; Published: 18 December 2020 Abstract: Venomics, the study of biological venoms, could potentially provide a new source of therapeutic compounds, yet information on the venoms from marine organisms, including cnidarians (sea anemones, corals, and jellyfish), is limited. This study identified the putative toxins of two species of jellyfish—edible jellyfish Rhopilema esculentum Kishinouye, 1891, also known as flame jellyfish, and Amuska jellyfish Sanderia malayensis Goette, 1886. Utilizing nano-flow liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nLC–MS/MS), 3000 proteins were identified from the nematocysts in each of the above two jellyfish species. Forty and fifty-one putative toxins were identified in R. esculentum and S. malayensis, respectively, which were further classified into eight toxin families according to their predicted functions. Amongst the identified putative toxins, hemostasis-impairing toxins and proteases were found to be the most dominant members (>60%).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 T + is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 34 of which you can access for free at: 2016; 197:1477-1488; Prepublished online 1 July from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication 2016; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600589 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477 Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8 Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A. Waugh, Sonia M. Leach, Brandon L. Moore, Tullia C. Bruno, Jonathan D. Buhrman and Jill E. Slansky J Immunol cites 95 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2016/07/01/jimmunol.160058 9.DCSupplemental This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 25, 2021. The Journal of Immunology Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptional Regulation of RKIP in Prostate Cancer Progression
    Health Science Campus FINAL APPROVAL OF DISSERTATION Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Sciences Transcriptional Regulation of RKIP in Prostate Cancer Progression Submitted by: Sandra Marie Beach In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Sciences Examination Committee Major Advisor: Kam Yeung, Ph.D. Academic William Maltese, Ph.D. Advisory Committee: Sonia Najjar, Ph.D. Han-Fei Ding, M.D., Ph.D. Manohar Ratnam, Ph.D. Senior Associate Dean College of Graduate Studies Michael S. Bisesi, Ph.D. Date of Defense: May 16, 2007 Transcriptional Regulation of RKIP in Prostate Cancer Progression Sandra Beach University of Toledo ACKNOWLDEGMENTS I thank my major advisor, Dr. Kam Yeung, for the opportunity to pursue my degree in his laboratory. I am also indebted to my advisory committee members past and present, Drs. Sonia Najjar, Han-Fei Ding, Manohar Ratnam, James Trempe, and Douglas Pittman for generously and judiciously guiding my studies and sharing reagents and equipment. I owe extended thanks to Dr. William Maltese as a committee member and chairman of my department for supporting my degree progress. The entire Department of Biochemistry and Cancer Biology has been most kind and helpful to me. Drs. Roy Collaco and Hong-Juan Cui have shared their excellent technical and practical advice with me throughout my studies. I thank members of the Yeung laboratory, Dr. Sungdae Park, Hui Hui Tang, Miranda Yeung for their support and collegiality. The data mining studies herein would not have been possible without the helpful advice of Dr. Robert Trumbly. I am also grateful for the exceptional assistance and shared microarray data of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Materials ZNF281 Enhances Cardiac Reprogramming
    Supplemental Materials ZNF281 enhances cardiac reprogramming by modulating cardiac and inflammatory gene expression Huanyu Zhou, Maria Gabriela Morales, Hisayuki Hashimoto, Matthew E. Dickson, Kunhua Song, Wenduo Ye, Min S. Kim, Hanspeter Niederstrasser, Zhaoning Wang, Beibei Chen, Bruce A. Posner, Rhonda Bassel-Duby and Eric N. Olson Supplemental Table 1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 2; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 3; related to the “quantitative mRNA measurement” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Table 4; related to the “ChIP-seq, gene ontology and pathway analysis” and “RNA-seq” and gene ontology analysis” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Figure S1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Figure S2; related to Figure 2. Supplemental Figure S3; related to Figure 3. Supplemental Figure S4; related to Figure 4. Supplemental Figure S5; related to Figure 6. Supplemental Table S1. Genes included in human retroviral ORF cDNA library. Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol AATF BMP8A CEBPE CTNNB1 ESR2 GDF3 HOXA5 IL17D ADIPOQ BRPF1 CEBPG CUX1 ESRRA GDF6 HOXA6 IL17F ADNP BRPF3 CERS1 CX3CL1 ETS1 GIN1 HOXA7 IL18 AEBP1 BUD31 CERS2 CXCL10 ETS2 GLIS3 HOXB1 IL19 AFF4 C17ORF77 CERS4 CXCL11 ETV3 GMEB1 HOXB13 IL1A AHR C1QTNF4 CFL2 CXCL12 ETV7 GPBP1 HOXB5 IL1B AIMP1 C21ORF66 CHIA CXCL13 FAM3B GPER HOXB6 IL1F3 ALS2CR8 CBFA2T2 CIR1 CXCL14 FAM3D GPI HOXB7 IL1F5 ALX1 CBFA2T3 CITED1 CXCL16 FASLG GREM1 HOXB9 IL1F6 ARGFX CBFB CITED2 CXCL3 FBLN1 GREM2 HOXC4 IL1F7
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicogenomics Applications of New Functional Genomics Technologies in Toxicology
    \-\w j Toxicogenomics Applications of new functional genomics technologies in toxicology Wilbert H.M. Heijne Proefschrift ter verkrijging vand egraa dva n doctor opgeza gva nd e rector magnificus vanWageninge n Universiteit, Prof.dr.ir. L. Speelman, in netopenbaa r te verdedigen op maandag6 decembe r200 4 des namiddagst e half twee ind eAul a - Table of contents Abstract Chapter I. page 1 General introduction [1] Chapter II page 21 Toxicogenomics of bromobenzene hepatotoxicity: a combined transcriptomics and proteomics approach[2] Chapter III page 48 Bromobenzene-induced hepatotoxicity atth etranscriptom e level PI Chapter IV page 67 Profiles of metabolites and gene expression in rats with chemically induced hepatic necrosis[4] Chapter V page 88 Liver gene expression profiles in relation to subacute toxicity in rats exposed to benzene[5] Chapter VI page 115 Toxicogenomics analysis of liver gene expression in relation to subacute toxicity in rats exposed totrichloroethylen e [6] Chapter VII page 135 Toxicogenomics analysis ofjoin t effects of benzene and trichloroethylene mixtures in rats m Chapter VII page 159 Discussion and conclusions References page 171 Appendices page 187 Samenvatting page 199 Dankwoord About the author Glossary Abbreviations List of genes Chapter I General introduction Parts of this introduction were publishedin : Molecular Biology in Medicinal Chemistry, Heijne etal., 2003 m NATO Advanced Research Workshop proceedings, Heijne eral., 2003 81 Chapter I 1. General introduction 1.1 Background /.1.1 Toxicologicalrisk
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, C12Q 1/68 (2018.01) A61P 31/18 (2006.01) DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, C12Q 1/70 (2006.01) HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (21) International Application Number: MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, PCT/US2018/056167 OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (22) International Filing Date: SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 16 October 2018 (16. 10.2018) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, (30) Priority Data: UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, 62/573,025 16 October 2017 (16. 10.2017) US TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, ΓΕ , IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, (71) Applicant: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TECHNOLOGY [US/US]; 77 Massachusetts Avenue, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Key Genes Regulating Skeletal Muscle Development and Growth in Farm Animals
    animals Review Key Genes Regulating Skeletal Muscle Development and Growth in Farm Animals Mohammadreza Mohammadabadi 1 , Farhad Bordbar 1,* , Just Jensen 2 , Min Du 3 and Wei Guo 4 1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman 77951, Iran; [email protected] 2 Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8210 Aarhus, Denmark; [email protected] 3 Washington Center for Muscle Biology, Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA; [email protected] 4 Muscle Biology and Animal Biologics, Animal and Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53558, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Skeletal muscle mass is an important economic trait, and muscle development and growth is a crucial factor to supply enough meat for human consumption. Thus, understanding (candidate) genes regulating skeletal muscle development is crucial for understanding molecular genetic regulation of muscle growth and can be benefit the meat industry toward the goal of in- creasing meat yields. During the past years, significant progress has been made for understanding these mechanisms, and thus, we decided to write a comprehensive review covering regulators and (candidate) genes crucial for muscle development and growth in farm animals. Detection of these genes and factors increases our understanding of muscle growth and development and is a great help for breeders to satisfy demands for meat production on a global scale. Citation: Mohammadabadi, M.; Abstract: Farm-animal species play crucial roles in satisfying demands for meat on a global scale, Bordbar, F.; Jensen, J.; Du, M.; Guo, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Tgfβ-Regulated Gene Expression by Smads and Sp1/KLF-Like Transcription Factors in Cancer VOLKER ELLENRIEDER
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 28 : 1531-1540 (2008) Review TGFβ-regulated Gene Expression by Smads and Sp1/KLF-like Transcription Factors in Cancer VOLKER ELLENRIEDER Signal Transduction Laboratory, Internal Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany Abstract. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF β) controls complex induces the canonical Smad signaling molecules which vital cellular functions through its ability to regulate gene then translocate into the nucleus to regulate transcription (2). The expression. TGFβ binding to its transmembrane receptor cellular response to TGF β can be extremely variable depending kinases initiates distinct intracellular signalling cascades on the cell type and the activation status of a cell at a given time. including the Smad signalling and transcription factors and also For instance, TGF β induces growth arrest and apoptosis in Smad-independent pathways. In normal epithelial cells, TGF β healthy epithelial cells, whereas it can also promote tumor stimulation induces a cytostatic program which includes the progression through stimulation of cell proliferation and the transcriptional repression of the c-Myc oncogene and the later induction of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of tumor induction of the cell cycle inhibitors p15 INK4b and p21 Cip1 . cells (1, 3). In the last decade it has become clear that both the During carcinogenesis, however, many tumor cells lose their tumor suppressing and the tumor promoting functions of TGF β ability to respond to TGF β with growth inhibition, and instead, are primarily regulated on the level of gene expression through activate genes involved in cell proliferation, invasion and Smad-dependent and -independent mechanisms (1, 2, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Using Viper, a Package for Virtual Inference of Protein-Activity by Enriched Regulon Analysis
    Using viper, a package for Virtual Inference of Protein-activity by Enriched Regulon analysis Mariano J. Alvarez1,2, Federico M. Giorgi1, and Andrea Califano1 1Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, 1130 St. Nicholas Ave., New York 2DarwinHealth Inc, 3960 Broadway, New York May 19, 2021 1 Overview of VIPER Phenotypic changes effected by pathophysiological events are now routinely captured by gene expression pro- file (GEP) measurements, determining mRNA abundance on a genome-wide scale in a cellular population[8, 9]. In contrast, methods to measure protein abundance on a proteome-wide scale using arrays[11] or mass spectrometry[10] technologies are far less developed, covering only a fraction of proteins, requiring large amounts of tissue, and failing to directly capture protein activity. Furthermore, mRNA expression does not constitute a reliable predictor of protein activity, as it fails to capture a variety of post-transcriptional and post-translational events that are involved in its modulation. Even reliable measurements of protein abundance, for instance by low-throughput antibody based methods or by higher-throughput methods such as mass spectrometry, do not necessarily provide quantitative assessment of functional activity. For instance, enzymatic activity of signal transduction proteins, such as kinases, ubiquitin ligases, and acetyltransferases, is frequently modulated by post-translational modification events that do not affect total protein abundance. Similarly, transcription factors may require post-translationally mediated activation, nuclear translocation, and co-factor availability before they may regulate specific repertoires of their transcriptional targets. Fi- nally, most target-specific drugs affect the activity of their protein substrates rather than their protein or mRNA transcript abundance.
    [Show full text]