Linaria Dalmatica Invades South-Facing Slopes and Less Grazed Areas in Grazing-Tolerant Mixed-Grass Prairie
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-011-0085-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Linaria dalmatica invades south-facing slopes and less grazed areas in grazing-tolerant mixed-grass prairie Dana M. Blumenthal • Andrew P. Norton • Samuel E. Cox • Erik M. Hardy • Glen E. Liston • Lisa Kennaway • D. Terrance Booth • Justin D. Derner Received: 5 October 2010 / Accepted: 29 July 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011 Abstract Identifying environments where invasive adjusted model selection techniques to quantify rela- plants are most invasive is key to understanding causes tionships between toadflax cover (measured using very of invasion and developing effective management high-resolution aerial imagery), and relative snow strategies. In mixed-grass prairie, invasive plants are deposition (estimated with a blowing snow model), often successful in relatively wet, nitrogen-rich areas, slope, aspect, soil texture, and grazing intensity and areas protected from grazing. Dalmatian toadflax, (estimated by proximity to water tanks). Toadflax a common invader of mixed-grass prairie, can also be was common throughout the 400 ha study site, occur- favored by high water and nitrogen availability, but is ring in 742 of 1,861 images. Toadflax cover was high thought to be relatively unpalatable to cattle, and on steeper slopes, particularly those with southern therefore favored by grazing. We used spatially- aspects. These two topographic variables were more effective in explaining toadflax distribution than modeled snow deposition, suggesting that factors other & D. M. Blumenthal ( ) Á E. M. Hardy than snow deposition cause toadflax invasion on south- Crops Research Laboratory, USDA—ARS Rangeland Resources Research Unit, 1701 Center Ave, Fort Collins, facing slopes. Toadflax cover was also high in areas CO 80521, USA further from water tanks, indicating that grazing may e-mail: [email protected] inhibit toadflax invasion. More broadly, this result suggests that grazing can reduce invasion of even A. P. Norton Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest relatively unpalatable species in ecosystems with long Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, evolutionary histories of grazing. CO, USA Keywords Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) Á S. E. Cox Á D. T. Booth Á J. D. Derner Crops Research Laboratory, USDA—ARS Rangeland Invasibility Á Rangeland Á Semi-arid grassland Á Resources Research Unit, High Plains Grasslands Resource availability Á Geostatistical model selection Research Station, 8408 Hildreth Road, Cheyenne, WY 82009-8899, USA G. E. Liston Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Introduction Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA The mixed-grass prairie is the largest remaining L. Kennaway USDA-APHIS—PPQ Center for Plant Health Science and grassland in North America. Although it is dominated Technology, Fort Collins, CO, USA by native species, large areas have also been invaded 123 D. M. Blumenthal et al. by introduced species (Larson et al. 2001). Invasibil- Blumenthal 2009). At the same study site, we have ity of mixed-grass prairie depends on both environ- observed dense toadflax infestations on slopes with mental variables and land use practices. At a southern aspects. We hypothesize that such infesta- landscape scale, invasive species richness and abun- tions might be associated with areas of high snow dance tends to be highest in riparian areas, in species- accumulation that develop as northwest winter winds rich plant communities, and along roadways, perhaps blow snow onto southeast-facing slopes (Liston et al. due to high water and nitrogen availability in such 2007). areas (Larson et al. 2001; Stohlgren et al. 1998; Although forage quality of toadflax is sufficient to 1999a). Livestock grazing is the primary land use meet livestock requirements (Frost et al. 2008), its throughout the mixed-grass prairie. Although grazing stems and leaves contain bitter-tasting iridoid glyco- can facilitate invasion in many ecosystems (Mack sides, and a potentially toxic quinazoline alkaloid 1981; Sala et al. 1986; Hobbs 2001; Brooks et al. (Groger and Johne 1965; Mahmoudian et al. 2002; 2006), in mixed-grass prairie it has been found to Jamieson and Bowers 2010). Iridoid glycoside con- have little effect on the richness of introduced species centrations are highest early in the season, when (Stohlgren et al. 1999b), and to inhibit invasion by relatively high forage quality would otherwise make several palatable introduced perennial grasses (Mur- toadflax most palatable (Frost et al. 2008, Jamieson and phy and Grant 2005; Stacy et al. 2005; Vaness and Bowers 2010). Observations that cattle tend to avoid Wilson 2007). This resistance to invasion in the toadflax also suggest that it is relatively unpalatable presence of grazing may stem from the long evolu- (Harris and Carter 1971; Lajeunesse 1999; Brown tionary history of grazing in mixed-grass prairie 2005). Consequently, grazing is thought to facilitate (Milchunas et al. 1988; 1992; Stohlgren et al. 1999b; toadflax invasion (Brown 2005). In accord with this Lyman and Wolverton 2002). suggestion, we have rarely observed grazed toadflax at In this study, we examined relationships between our study site. In contrast with this suggestion, the spatial distribution of Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria however, we have observed dense toadflax infestations dalmatica (L.) P. Mill. ssp. Dalmatica; henceforth within cattle exclosures. It is therefore difficult to ‘‘toadflax’’) in mixed-grass prairie, and environmen- predict how grazing influences toadflax in mixed-grass tal variables thought to influence its invasion. Toad- prairie. Does grazing favor toadflax because cattle flax is a widespread invasive forb in western North avoid it, or inhibit toadflax because native mixed-grass America, including much of the mixed-grass prairie. prairie species are well adapted to grazing? It has been declared noxious in 12 western US states, Our objective was to quantitatively assess the and can reduce forage availability (Robocker 1974), relationship between toadflax distribution and envi- livestock carrying capacity, and the land value of ronmental and management factors that might influ- rangeland (Lacey and Olsen 1991). ence mixed-grass prairie invasibility. Specifically, we Observations of toadflax suggest that it tends to examined relationships between toadflax cover (esti- invade disturbed areas, open rocky sites, well-drained, mated from very high-resolution aerial images) and coarse-textured soils, and sloped areas, particularly snow accumulation (modeled with a blowing snow those with a southern aspect (Alex 1962; Robocker model), slope, aspect, soil texture, and cattle grazing 1974; Vujnovic and Wein 1996; Lajeunesse 1999; Rew intensity (estimated by proximity to water sources). et al. 2005). Experimental studies in mixed-grass We used spatially-adjusted model selection analysis prairie have found toadflax to be favored by both low (Hoeting et al. 2006) to identify the set of environ- species richness and high nitrogen availability (Maron mental factors that most parsimoniously explained and Marler 2008; Blumenthal 2009). Effects of water toadflax abundance. addition have been mixed. Spring water addition had little effect on toadflax invasion of experimental two- year-old mixed-grass prairie plant communities in Materials and methods western Montana (Maron and Marler 2008). In contrast, increased snowfall was critical to toadflax To identify environmental correlates of toadflax invasion of relatively undisturbed mixed-grass prairie invasion, we measured toadflax cover at 1,861 in southeastern Wyoming (Blumenthal et al. 2008; evenly-spaced locations within a 400 ha area of 123 Linaria dalmatica invades south-facing slopes native mixed-grass prairie using very high-resolution at least 28 years prior to this study, and were grazed aerial imagery (Blumenthal et al. 2007). We then at either 6.29 ha per cow-calf pair (approximately linked toadflax cover data with environmental data 40% removal of above-ground net primary produc- using the geographic information system, ArcGIS 9 tivity) or 5.14 ha per cow-calf pair (60% removal) (ESRI 2007), and used spatial linear models to season-long stocking rates during the 8 years imme- determine the combination of variables that best diately preceding sampling. explained toadflax cover. Measurements of toadflax cover Study site We measured toadflax cover using aerial imagery The study site was located at the High Plains with approximately 2 mm GSD (ground sample Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, Wyoming, distance, a measure of resolution). The area repre- at the southwestern edge of the northern mixed-grass sented in each image was approximately prairie. This part of the mixed-grass prairie is 8.5 9 5.7 m, varying slightly due to variation in relatively dry, with a long-term (130 year) average airplane flight altitude. Details of image acquisition annual precipitation of 381 mm, and a peak in May. and analysis are described in Blumenthal et al. Precipitation during the year preceding sampling (2007). Briefly, images were taken from a piloted (July 2002–June 2003) was 340 mm. Measurements fixed-wing aircraft flown at 72 km h-1 ground speed, were made between late July and early August 2003 100 m above ground, mounted with an 11.1-mega- within five annually grazed (June through mid- pixel camera equipped with a 300 mm lens. An aerial October) pastures (Fig. 1). Throughout the site, survey system (Track’Air, Oldenzaal, The Nether- vegetation was dominated