Linaria Dalmatica Invades South-Facing Slopes and Less Grazed Areas in Grazing-Tolerant Mixed-Grass Prairie

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Linaria Dalmatica Invades South-Facing Slopes and Less Grazed Areas in Grazing-Tolerant Mixed-Grass Prairie Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-011-0085-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Linaria dalmatica invades south-facing slopes and less grazed areas in grazing-tolerant mixed-grass prairie Dana M. Blumenthal • Andrew P. Norton • Samuel E. Cox • Erik M. Hardy • Glen E. Liston • Lisa Kennaway • D. Terrance Booth • Justin D. Derner Received: 5 October 2010 / Accepted: 29 July 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011 Abstract Identifying environments where invasive adjusted model selection techniques to quantify rela- plants are most invasive is key to understanding causes tionships between toadflax cover (measured using very of invasion and developing effective management high-resolution aerial imagery), and relative snow strategies. In mixed-grass prairie, invasive plants are deposition (estimated with a blowing snow model), often successful in relatively wet, nitrogen-rich areas, slope, aspect, soil texture, and grazing intensity and areas protected from grazing. Dalmatian toadflax, (estimated by proximity to water tanks). Toadflax a common invader of mixed-grass prairie, can also be was common throughout the 400 ha study site, occur- favored by high water and nitrogen availability, but is ring in 742 of 1,861 images. Toadflax cover was high thought to be relatively unpalatable to cattle, and on steeper slopes, particularly those with southern therefore favored by grazing. We used spatially- aspects. These two topographic variables were more effective in explaining toadflax distribution than modeled snow deposition, suggesting that factors other & D. M. Blumenthal ( ) Á E. M. Hardy than snow deposition cause toadflax invasion on south- Crops Research Laboratory, USDA—ARS Rangeland Resources Research Unit, 1701 Center Ave, Fort Collins, facing slopes. Toadflax cover was also high in areas CO 80521, USA further from water tanks, indicating that grazing may e-mail: [email protected] inhibit toadflax invasion. More broadly, this result suggests that grazing can reduce invasion of even A. P. Norton Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest relatively unpalatable species in ecosystems with long Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, evolutionary histories of grazing. CO, USA Keywords Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) Á S. E. Cox Á D. T. Booth Á J. D. Derner Crops Research Laboratory, USDA—ARS Rangeland Invasibility Á Rangeland Á Semi-arid grassland Á Resources Research Unit, High Plains Grasslands Resource availability Á Geostatistical model selection Research Station, 8408 Hildreth Road, Cheyenne, WY 82009-8899, USA G. E. Liston Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Introduction Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA The mixed-grass prairie is the largest remaining L. Kennaway USDA-APHIS—PPQ Center for Plant Health Science and grassland in North America. Although it is dominated Technology, Fort Collins, CO, USA by native species, large areas have also been invaded 123 D. M. Blumenthal et al. by introduced species (Larson et al. 2001). Invasibil- Blumenthal 2009). At the same study site, we have ity of mixed-grass prairie depends on both environ- observed dense toadflax infestations on slopes with mental variables and land use practices. At a southern aspects. We hypothesize that such infesta- landscape scale, invasive species richness and abun- tions might be associated with areas of high snow dance tends to be highest in riparian areas, in species- accumulation that develop as northwest winter winds rich plant communities, and along roadways, perhaps blow snow onto southeast-facing slopes (Liston et al. due to high water and nitrogen availability in such 2007). areas (Larson et al. 2001; Stohlgren et al. 1998; Although forage quality of toadflax is sufficient to 1999a). Livestock grazing is the primary land use meet livestock requirements (Frost et al. 2008), its throughout the mixed-grass prairie. Although grazing stems and leaves contain bitter-tasting iridoid glyco- can facilitate invasion in many ecosystems (Mack sides, and a potentially toxic quinazoline alkaloid 1981; Sala et al. 1986; Hobbs 2001; Brooks et al. (Groger and Johne 1965; Mahmoudian et al. 2002; 2006), in mixed-grass prairie it has been found to Jamieson and Bowers 2010). Iridoid glycoside con- have little effect on the richness of introduced species centrations are highest early in the season, when (Stohlgren et al. 1999b), and to inhibit invasion by relatively high forage quality would otherwise make several palatable introduced perennial grasses (Mur- toadflax most palatable (Frost et al. 2008, Jamieson and phy and Grant 2005; Stacy et al. 2005; Vaness and Bowers 2010). Observations that cattle tend to avoid Wilson 2007). This resistance to invasion in the toadflax also suggest that it is relatively unpalatable presence of grazing may stem from the long evolu- (Harris and Carter 1971; Lajeunesse 1999; Brown tionary history of grazing in mixed-grass prairie 2005). Consequently, grazing is thought to facilitate (Milchunas et al. 1988; 1992; Stohlgren et al. 1999b; toadflax invasion (Brown 2005). In accord with this Lyman and Wolverton 2002). suggestion, we have rarely observed grazed toadflax at In this study, we examined relationships between our study site. In contrast with this suggestion, the spatial distribution of Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria however, we have observed dense toadflax infestations dalmatica (L.) P. Mill. ssp. Dalmatica; henceforth within cattle exclosures. It is therefore difficult to ‘‘toadflax’’) in mixed-grass prairie, and environmen- predict how grazing influences toadflax in mixed-grass tal variables thought to influence its invasion. Toad- prairie. Does grazing favor toadflax because cattle flax is a widespread invasive forb in western North avoid it, or inhibit toadflax because native mixed-grass America, including much of the mixed-grass prairie. prairie species are well adapted to grazing? It has been declared noxious in 12 western US states, Our objective was to quantitatively assess the and can reduce forage availability (Robocker 1974), relationship between toadflax distribution and envi- livestock carrying capacity, and the land value of ronmental and management factors that might influ- rangeland (Lacey and Olsen 1991). ence mixed-grass prairie invasibility. Specifically, we Observations of toadflax suggest that it tends to examined relationships between toadflax cover (esti- invade disturbed areas, open rocky sites, well-drained, mated from very high-resolution aerial images) and coarse-textured soils, and sloped areas, particularly snow accumulation (modeled with a blowing snow those with a southern aspect (Alex 1962; Robocker model), slope, aspect, soil texture, and cattle grazing 1974; Vujnovic and Wein 1996; Lajeunesse 1999; Rew intensity (estimated by proximity to water sources). et al. 2005). Experimental studies in mixed-grass We used spatially-adjusted model selection analysis prairie have found toadflax to be favored by both low (Hoeting et al. 2006) to identify the set of environ- species richness and high nitrogen availability (Maron mental factors that most parsimoniously explained and Marler 2008; Blumenthal 2009). Effects of water toadflax abundance. addition have been mixed. Spring water addition had little effect on toadflax invasion of experimental two- year-old mixed-grass prairie plant communities in Materials and methods western Montana (Maron and Marler 2008). In contrast, increased snowfall was critical to toadflax To identify environmental correlates of toadflax invasion of relatively undisturbed mixed-grass prairie invasion, we measured toadflax cover at 1,861 in southeastern Wyoming (Blumenthal et al. 2008; evenly-spaced locations within a 400 ha area of 123 Linaria dalmatica invades south-facing slopes native mixed-grass prairie using very high-resolution at least 28 years prior to this study, and were grazed aerial imagery (Blumenthal et al. 2007). We then at either 6.29 ha per cow-calf pair (approximately linked toadflax cover data with environmental data 40% removal of above-ground net primary produc- using the geographic information system, ArcGIS 9 tivity) or 5.14 ha per cow-calf pair (60% removal) (ESRI 2007), and used spatial linear models to season-long stocking rates during the 8 years imme- determine the combination of variables that best diately preceding sampling. explained toadflax cover. Measurements of toadflax cover Study site We measured toadflax cover using aerial imagery The study site was located at the High Plains with approximately 2 mm GSD (ground sample Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, Wyoming, distance, a measure of resolution). The area repre- at the southwestern edge of the northern mixed-grass sented in each image was approximately prairie. This part of the mixed-grass prairie is 8.5 9 5.7 m, varying slightly due to variation in relatively dry, with a long-term (130 year) average airplane flight altitude. Details of image acquisition annual precipitation of 381 mm, and a peak in May. and analysis are described in Blumenthal et al. Precipitation during the year preceding sampling (2007). Briefly, images were taken from a piloted (July 2002–June 2003) was 340 mm. Measurements fixed-wing aircraft flown at 72 km h-1 ground speed, were made between late July and early August 2003 100 m above ground, mounted with an 11.1-mega- within five annually grazed (June through mid- pixel camera equipped with a 300 mm lens. An aerial October) pastures (Fig. 1). Throughout the site, survey system (Track’Air, Oldenzaal, The Nether- vegetation was dominated
Recommended publications
  • Biological Opinion on USFS Aerial Application of Fire Retardants on NFS Lands
    2011 USFWS Biological Opinion on USFS Aerial Application of Fire Retardants on NFS Lands BIOLOGICAL OPINION Effects to Listed Species from U.S. Forest Service Aerial Application of Fire Retardants on National Forest System Lands Consultation Conducted by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Regions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8) December 6, 2011 Return to Table of Contents 1 | P a g e 2011 USFWS Biological Opinion on USFS Aerial Application of Fire Retardants on NFS Lands Table of Contents Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Consultation History ................................................................................................................................... 11 Species not likely to be adversely affected ................................................................................................. 17 BIOLOGICAL OPINION ................................................................................................................................. 27 Description of the Proposed Action ........................................................................................................ 27 Aerial Application of Fire Retardant Direction .................................................................................... 28 Reporting and Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • New Contributions to the Molecular Systematics and the Evolution of Host-Plant Associations in the Genus Chrysolina (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Chrysomelinae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 547: 165–192 New(2015) contributions to the molecular systematics and the evolution... 165 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.547.6018 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New contributions to the molecular systematics and the evolution of host-plant associations in the genus Chrysolina (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Chrysomelinae) José A. Jurado-Rivera1, Eduard Petitpierre1,2 1 Departament de Biologia, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain 2 Institut Mediterrani d’Estudis Avançats, CSIC, Miquel Marquès 21, 07190 Esporles, Balearic Islands, Spain Corresponding author: José A. Jurado-Rivera ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Schmitt | Received 15 April 2015 | Accepted 31 August 2015 | Published 17 December 2015 http://zoobank.org/AF13498F-BF42-4609-AA96-9760490C3BB5 Citation: Jurado-Rivera JA, Petitpierre E (2015) New contributions to the molecular systematics and the evolution of host-plant associations in the genus Chrysolina (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Chrysomelinae). In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 5. ZooKeys 547: 165–192. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.547.6018 Abstract The taxonomic circumscription of the large and diverse leaf beetle genusChrysolina Motschulsky is not clear, and its discrimination from the closely related genus Oreina Chevrolat has classically been controver- sial. In addition, the subgeneric arrangement of the species is unstable, and proposals segregating Chryso- lina species into new genera have been recently suggested. In this context, the availability of a phylogenetic framework would provide the basis for a stable taxonomic system, but the existing phylogenies are based on few taxa and have low resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • (Linaria Vulgaris) and Dalmatian Toadflax (Linaria
    DISSERTATION VIABILITY AND INVASIVE POTENTIAL OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN YELLOW TOADFLAX (LINARIA VULGARIS) AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX (LINARIA DALMATICA) Submitted by Marie F.S. Turner Department of Soil and Crop Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2012 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Sarah Ward Christopher Richards David Steingraeber George Beck Sharlene Sing Copyright by Marie Frances Sundem Turner 2012 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT VIABILITY AND INVASIVE POTENTIAL OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN YELLOW TOADFLAX (LINARIA VULGARIS) AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX (LINARIA DALMATICA) Although outcomes of hybridization are highly variable, it is now considered to play an important role in evolution, speciation, and invasion. Hybridization has recently been confirmed between populations of yellow (or common) toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) and Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States. The presence of hybrid toadflax populations on public lands is of concern, as both parents are aggressive invaders already listed as noxious weeds in multiple western states. A common garden experiment was designed to measure differences in quantitative (shoot length, biomass, flowering stems, seed capsule production) phenological (time of emergence, first flowering and seed maturity) and ecophysiological (photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency (WUE)) traits for yellow and Dalmatian toadflax, F1 and BC1 hybrids, as well as natural field-collected hybrids from two sites. Genotypes were cloned to produce true replicates and the entire common garden was also replicated at two locations (Colorado and Montana); physiological data were collected only in Colorado. All genotypes grew larger and were more reproductively active in Colorado than in Montana, and hybrids outperformed parent taxa across vegetative and reproductive traits indicating heterosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow and Dalmatian Toadflax
    YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX PNW135 PNW135 | Page 1 YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX By Dale K. Whaley, Assistant Professor, Ag and Natural Resources, Washington State University Extension. Gary L. Piper, Emeritus Professor, Department of Entomology, Washington State University Abstract Yellow toadflax and Dalmatian toadflax are non-native plants that have become two of the most troublesome invasive weeds in North America. Infesting forests, range and grasslands, and other areas, these two weeds are very prevalent in the Pacific Northwest. This publication outlines the plants’ characteristics, variations, growth and reproduction, distribution and economic impact, as well as management strategies. Table of Contents Introduction 3 Identification 4 Variation 4 Growth and Reproduction 5 Distribution and Economic Impact 6 Management Strategies 7 Prevention, Early Detection, and Rapid Response 7 Cultural Control 8 Livestock Grazing for Control 8 Physical and Mechanical Control 9 Chemical Control 9 Biological Control 9 Maintenance 15 References 15 PNW135 | Page 2 PNW PUBLICATION | YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX Yellow and Dalmatian Toadflax Introduction Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria dalmatica (L.) Mill. (Figure 1), and yellow toadflax, Linaria vulgaris Mill. (Figure 2), commonly referred to as “butter and eggs,” are two non-native plants that were introduced into North America as ornamentals from the Mediterranean region. Introduced by the 1800s, these two non-native plants have since escaped flower beds and have become two of the most troublesome invasive weeds infesting millions of acres across much of temperate North America. In the Pacific Northwest (defined here as Washington, Oregon, and Idaho) these plants can be found infesting forests, range and grassland, rights of way, lands put into conservation programs like the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), and other disturbed areas (Sing et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalmatian Toadflax, Broad-Leaved Toadflax and Yellow Toadflax, Butter and Eggs, Wild Snapdragon, Common Toadflax
    ELEMENT STEWARDSHIP ABSTRACT for Linaria genistifolia (L.) P. Miller ssp. dalmatica (L.) Maire & Petitmengin (Synonym: Linaria dalmatica (L.) P. Miller) AND Linaria vulgaris P. Miller Dalmatian toadflax, Broad-leaved toadflax AND Yellow toadflax, Butter and eggs, Wild snapdragon, Common toadflax To the User: Element Stewardship Abstracts (ESAs) are prepared to provide The Nature Conservancy's Stewardship staff and other land managers with current management-related information on those species and communities that are most important to protect, or most important to control. The abstracts organize and summarize data from numerous sources including literature and researchers and managers actively working with the species or community. We hope, by providing this abstract free of charge, to encourage users to contribute their information to the abstract. This sharing of information will benefit all land managers by ensuring the availability of an abstract that contains up-to-date information on management techniques and knowledgeable contacts. Contributors of information will be acknowledged within the abstract and receive updated editions. To contribute information, contact the editor whose address is listed at the end of the document. For ease of update and retrievability, the abstracts are stored on computer at the national office of The Nature Conservancy. This abstract is a compilation of available information and is not an endorsement of particular practices or products. Please do not remove this cover statement from the attached abstract. Authors of this Abstract: Alan Carpenter & Thomas Murray, Land Stewardship Consulting, 2941 20th Street, Boulder, CO 80304 © THE NATURE CONSERVANCY 1815 North Lynn Street, Arlington, Virginia 22209 (703) 841 5300 1 SPECIES CODES PDSCR110F1 (Linaria genistifolia ssp dalmatica) AND PDSCR110E0 (Linaria vulgaris) SCIENTIFIC NAMES Linaria genistifolia (L.) P.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Mecinus Janthiniformis Tosevski & Caldara
    999999999Mecinus janthiniformis Tosevski & Caldara INVASIVE SPECIES ATTACKED: Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) PREVIOUSY KNOWN AS: Mecinus janthiniformis was previously described as Mecinus janthinus. Notation: Weevils were released in Canada and the U.S.A as Mecinus janthinus and were later discovered to be a mix of M. janthinus and the closely related weevil species M. janthiniformis (see EFFECTIVENESS ON HOST PLANT section) (Sing et al. 2016). As of 2019, M. janthinus is not believed to have survived in B.C., therefore, the following text pertains to M. janthiniformis unless otherwise described (see BRITISH COLUMBIA RECORD section). OPERATIONAL FIELD GUIDE: Mecinus janthiniformis (Mecinus janthinus) – Operational Field Guide, Ministry of Forests and Range. TYPE OF AGENT: Stem-mining beetle (weevil) COLLECTABILITY: Mass ORIGIN: Macedonia DESCRIPTION AND LIFE CYCLE Adult: Mecinus janthiniformis adults are black to somewhat blue coloured weevils appearing slightly metallic when young. They have elongated, cylindrical bodies 3.2 - 6.0 mm in length and distinct linear, parallel grooves running the length of their wing covers (elytra). The weevils have long snouts and the males have strongly toothed front femurs (Sing et al. 2016; Harris et al. 2005). They emerge in May and begin feeding on foliage, concentrating on the tender shoot tips of their hosts. The feeding is easily distinguished by the shot-hole shape left in the tissue that with multiple agents can deform the plant and prevent flowering. Mating and egg-laying begins immediately, continuing until mid-July (Powell et al. 1994). Females chew cavities typically into the upper portion of the main stem or the basil portion of the flowering side-branches and oviposit a single egg into each.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture
    Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture Forest Service Donald L. Hazlett Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-130 June 2004 Hazlett, Donald L. 2004. Vascular plant species of the Comanche National Grassland in southeast- ern Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-130. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 36 p. Abstract This checklist has 785 species and 801 taxa (for taxa, the varieties and subspecies are included in the count) in 90 plant families. The most common plant families are the grasses (Poaceae) and the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Of this total, 513 taxa are definitely known to occur on the Comanche National Grassland. The remaining 288 taxa occur in nearby areas of southeastern Colorado and may be discovered on the Comanche National Grassland. The Author Dr. Donald L. Hazlett has worked as an ecologist, botanist, ethnobotanist, and teacher in Latin America and in Colorado. He has specialized in the flora of the eastern plains since 1985. His many years in Latin America prompted him to include Spanish common names in this report, names that are seldom reported in floristic pub- lications. He is also compiling plant folklore stories for Great Plains plants. Since Don is a native of Otero county, this project was of special interest. All Photos by the Author Cover: Purgatoire Canyon, Comanche National Grassland You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalmatian Toadflax Linaria Dalmatica L
    Dalmatian toadflax Linaria dalmatica L. Synonyms: None Other common names: None Family: Plantaginaceae Invasiveness Rank: 58 The invasiveness rank is calculated based on a species’ ecological impacts, biological attributes, distribution, and response to control measures. The ranks are scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a plant that poses no threat to native ecosystems and 100 representing a plant that poses a major threat to native ecosystems. Description 1993, Royer and Dickinson 1999). Dalmatian toadflax is a perennial plant that grows up to 91 cm tall from a stout, woody rootstalk. Stems are glabrous, erect, and often branched. Leaves are 19 to 25 ½ mm wide, lanceolate to ovate, acute or long-tapered, clasping, and alternate (although they often appear to be opposite). Stems and leaves are smooth and bluish- green. Flowers are born in long terminal inflorescences. They are two-lipped and 19 to 38 mm long. Each has a long spur. The throat, which closes the lower lip, is densely hairy and white to orange colored. The fruits are two-celled capsules. Each capsule contains numerous small seeds (Wetherwax 1993, Royer and Dickinson 1999, Whitson et al. 2000). Flowers of Linaria dalmatica L. Photo by B. Nowierski. Ecological Impact Impact on community composition, structure, and interactions: Dalmatian toadflax can outcompete and displace native plant species (Zouhar 2003). Grazing Linaria dalmatica L. Photo by Utah State University Archive. animals find this plant unpalatable. Bumble bees and halictid bees are the most important pollinators for Similar species: Yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) can Dalmatian toadflax (Carpenter and Murray 1998). be distinguished from Dalmatian toadflax by its much Dalmatian toadflax may form hybrids (Vujnovic and narrower leaves and smaller yellow flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control Of
    Biotic suppression of invasive weeds in Washington state: a half-century of progress Gary L. Piper1 Summary Washington state has long employed natural enemies for the management of invasive aquatic and terrestrial plant species infesting state, federal, tribal, and privately owned water bodies and lands. During the last 55 years, a total of 72 natural enemies have been used for the biological control of 30 nonindigenous weeds. Over 85% of the organisms deployed have been insects, the remaining bioagents consisting of fungi, mites, and nematodes. Of these accidental and intentional introductions, 81% have readily established and yielded various levels of suppression against 27 annual, biennial, and perennial weeds. In recent years, populations of Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria genistifolia ssp. dalmatica, diffuse knapweed, Centaurea diffusa, and other undesired plant species have been reduced by a diverse assem- blage of biotic agents. Keywords: biological control, failure, history, invasive weeds, success, Washington state. Introduction Of this land area, approximately 5.1 million ha (29.7%) are publicly owned and 12.1 million ha (70.3%) are Humans have altered the composition of the Earth’s owned by private individuals, corporations, and tribal vegetation for several millenia through their deliberate entities. Rangeland and forestland cover almost 75% of or accidental dispersal of plant species beyond their the state, with rangeland accounting for 2.8 million ha native ranges (Williams 1980, di Castri 1989). Unfortu- and forests occupying 2.2 million ha (WRC/WCC nately, many of these introduced species have become 1986). Agriculture, especially the range-based live- highly invasive or “weedy” in their new ranges and stock industry, and forestry enterprises – production, have caused severe economic, ecological, and human processing, and marketing – is worth $28 billion, or health impacts over a wide range of agricultural and about 12% of Washington’s economy (Hasslen & nonagricultural environments by displacing native McCall 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Inhibition of Dalmatian Toadflax, Linaria Dalmatica (L
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Growth Inhibition of Dalmatian Toadflax, Linaria da/matiea (L.) Miller, in Response to Herbivory by the Biological Control Agent Meeinus janthinus Germar1 Marjolein Schat,2 Sharlene E. Sing,3 Robert K. D. Peterson,2,4 Fabian D. Menalled,2 and David K. Weaver 2 . 2Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA. 3USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA. J. Entomol. Sci. 46(3): 232-246 (July 2011) Abstract Our study reports the results of field and garden experiments designed to quantita­ tively evaluate the impact of herbivory by a weed biological control agent, the stem-mining wee­ vil Mecinus janthinus Germar, on the growth of its exotic host Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria dalmatica (L.) Miller. Herbivory by M. janthinus under both natural and manipulated environmen­ tal conditions inhibited L. dalmatica growth. Reductions in stem length, biomass, and growth were more pronounced for plants subjected to both exophagous (adult) and endophagous (lar­ val) feeding injury than for plants exposed only to adult folivory. Decreases we observed in root biomass could additionally inhibit shoot production from lateral roots. This provides a plausible mechanism explaining anecdotal reports correlating the reduced spread of L. dalmatica with at­ tack by M. jan thin us. Our results indicate that L. dalmatica growth is compromised once a thresh­ old density equivalent to 5 M. janthinus larvae per stem is exceeded. The consistency of growth responses observed in this study suggests that a mechanistic/quantitative approach, such as measuring the impact of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]