DOCSLIB.ORG

Retrograde Transport of Mutant Ricin to the Endoplasmic Reticulum with Subsequent Translocation to Cytosol (Ricin͞toxin͞translocation͞retrograde Transport͞sulfation)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Retrograde Transport of Mutant Ricin to the Endoplasmic Reticulum with Subsequent Translocation to Cytosol (Ricin͞toxin͞translocation͞retrograde Transport͞sulfation) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 3783–3788, April 1997 Cell Biology Retrograde transport of mutant ricin to the endoplasmic reticulum with subsequent translocation to cytosol (ricinytoxinytranslocationyretrograde transportysulfation) ANDRZEJ RAPAK,PÅL Ø. FALNES, AND SJUR OLSNES* Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway Communicated by R. John Collier, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, January 30, 1997 (received for review November 25, 1996) ABSTRACT Translocation of ricin A chain to the cytosol (20). Because this labeling takes place in the Golgi apparatus, only has been proposed to take place from the endoplasmic reticulum molecules that have already been transported retrograde to the (ER), but attempts to visualize ricin in this organelle have failed. Golgi complex will be labeled. Furthermore, because only the A Here we modified ricin A chain to contain a tyrosine sulfation chain carrying the sulfation site will be labeled, the B chain, which site alone or in combination with N-glycosylation sites. When migrates at almost the same rate as the modified A chain, will not reconstituted with ricin B chain and incubated with cells in the complicate the interpretation of the data. We here present 35 presence of Na2 SO4, the modified A chains were labeled. The evidence that sulfated ricin A chain is transported retrograde to labeling was prevented by brefeldin A and ilimaquinone, and it the ER and then translocated to the cytosol. appears to take place in the Golgi apparatus. This method allows selective labeling of ricin molecules that have already been MATERIALS AND METHODS 35 transported retrograde to this organelle. A chain containing Materials and Buffers. Na2 SO4 was from Amersham. Rat C-terminal N-glycosylation sites became core glycosylated, indi- monoclonal (9G10) anti-glucose regulated protein 94 (GRP94) cating retrograde transport to the ER. In part of the toxin was from StressGen Biotechnologies (Victoria, Canada). Affin- molecules, the A chain was released from the B chain and ity-purified rabbit anti-BIP, was obtained from Linda Hendershot translocated to the cytosol. The finding that glycosylated A chain (St. Jude’s Children Hospital, Memphis, TN). This antibody was was present in the cytosol indicates that translocation takes place found to cross-react with cytosolic heat shock protein 70 (HSP70). after transport of the toxin to the ER. Mouse monoclonal (1D3) anti-protein disulfate isomerase (PDI) was obtained from Steven Fuller (European Molecular Biology Ricin is a plant toxin that is extensively used in the construction Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany). Anti-p58 was obtained from of immunotoxins for targeted therapy of cancer and other dis- Jaakko Saraste (University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway). Anti- eases (1–3). The toxin consists of an enzymatically active A chain rab5 was obtained from Harald Stenmark (Institute for Cancer and a B chain with lectin properties (4). The A chain enters the Research, Oslo). Hepes medium contained bicarbonate-free cytosol and inactivates ribosomes by depurination of a single Eagle’s minimum essential medium buffered with 20 mM Hepes adenosine residue in 28S ribosomal RNA (5, 6). The B chain (N-2-hydroxethylpiperazine-N9-2-ethanesulfonic acid) to pH 7.4. binds to galactose-containing surface receptors (7). The surface- PBS contained 140 mM NaCl and 10 mM Na2HPO4 (pH 7.2). bound toxin is slowly endocytosed (8). Part of the internalized Lysis buffer consisted of PBS (pH 7.2) containing 1 mM EDTA, ricin is transported back to the cell surface, part is delivered to 1% Triton X-100, 200 unitsyml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenyl- lysosomes and degraded, and part is transported to the trans- methylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Rabbit anti-ricin was obtained Golgi network (9). Translocation of ricin A chain to the cytosol by standard immunization. Endoglycosidase H (endo H) and has been proposed to take place from the endoplasmic reticulum endoglycosidase F (PNGase F) were from New England Biolabs. (ER; refs. 10–12). In fact, Shigella toxin, which has the same Cell Culture. Cells were maintained and propagated under intracellular target as ricin (13, 14), has been visualized in the ER standard conditions (5% CO2 in Eagle’s minimal essential (15), and the related cholera and Escherichia coli heat labile medium containing 5% fetal calf serum). Two days before the toxins have C-terminal (KyH)DEL sequences that could act as experiment, the cells were seeded into 12- or 24-well Costar 5 4 ER retrieval signals (16). Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A has plates at a density of 10 and 5 3 10 cells per well, respectively. a C terminus that, after removal of the C-terminal lysine residue, Plasmids. To form ricin A-sulf-1, a C-terminal extension was ends in RDEL (16). Ricin does not contain such a sequence. introduced by PCR using wild-type ricin A chain cDNA (21) However, addition of a KDEL sequence to the C terminus of ricin as template and 59-GGATCCTATCAAGATGGGTATTCG- A chain was found to increase the toxic effect of whole ricin and, TAGTCTTCTGCGCTGCTTGGTGGAGGTGCGCA- in particular, that of the free A chain (10, 12, 18). TCTATACACC-39 as the reverse primer. To form ricin A-sulf-2, To test if ricin is transported retrograde from the trans-Golgi ricin A-sulf-1 was used as template, and 59-CGTCGGATC- network to the ER, we decided to use transfer of N-linked CCGGGCTATCACTGGGATGTGTTATTTTTG- oligosaccharides onto free glycosylation sites in ricin A chain as GTGCCGTTAGATGGGTATTCGTAGTCTTCTGCGC-39 a test for the presence of toxin in the ER. It has been found that was used as the reverse primer. In both cases 59-GCAAT- only '5% of endocytosed ricin is located in the trans-Golgi CACTCATCTTTTCACTGATGTTC-39 was used as the for- network (19). It follows that if labeled toxin is added to the cells, ward primer. The product was cut with BglII and BamHI and there will be a serious background problem when one looks for cloned into pRA (21) that had been cut with the same enzymes toxin in the Golgi apparatus and in the ER. To reduce this and dephosphorylated. From the plasmids obtained, cDNA for background, we used tyrosine sulfation as a labeling procedure the modified A chains were cut out with NcoI and EcoRI and cloned into pMAL-cN which had been cut partially with NcoI The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in Abbreviations: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; SLO, streptolysin O; PDI, accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. protein disulfate isomerase; MBP, maltose-binding protein; endo H, endoglycosidase H; PNGase F, endoglycosidase F; HSP70, heat shock Copyright q 1997 by THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE USA protein 70; GRP94, glucose regulated protein 94. 0027-8424y97y943783-6$2.00y0 *To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail: olsnes@ PNAS is available online at http:yywww.pnas.org. radium.uio.no. 3783 Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021 3784 Cell Biology: Rapak et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) and to completion with EcoRI. pMAL-cN was obtained by with 0.5% Triton X-100. The lysate and cytosol were exposed cutting pMAL-c (New England Biolabs) with StuI and ligating to immobilized anti-ricin antibodies, and the adsorbed mate- in an NcoI linker: 59-GCCATGGC-39. rial was subjected to nonreducing SDSyPAGE. Measurement of Cytotoxicity of Endocytosed Toxin. Vero SDSyPAGE. SDSyPAGE was carried out as described (22) cells were incubated for4hinHepes medium without leucine in the absence or presence of 2-mercaptoethanol, as indicated. with increasing amounts of toxin. The cells were then trans- The gels were fixed in 4% acetic acidy27% methanol for 30 min 3 35 ferred to Hepes medium containing 1 mCiyml [ H]leucine (1 and then, in the case of proteins labeled with Na2 SO4, treated Ci 5 37 GBq) and no unlabeled leucine and were incubated for with 1 M sodium salicylate (pH 5.8) in 2% glycerol for 30 min. 20 min at 378C. The cells were then extracted with 5% Dried gels were exposed to Kodak XAR-5 films in the absence trichloroacetic acid for 10 min, followed by a brief wash in 5% of intensifying screens at 2808C for fluorography. trichloroacetic acid, and subsequently dissolved in 0.1 M KOH, Immunoblots. The samples were subjected to reducing SDSy and the cell-associated radioactivity was measured. PAGE in a 12% gel, and proteins were transferred to a poly(vi- Glycosidase Treatment. Vero cells were incubated with ricin nylidene difluoride) membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore). After containing A-sulf-2, lysed, and immunoprecipitated with im- blocking with 5% milk in PBS for 1 h, the membranes were mobilized anti-ricin. The beads were heated at 1008C for 10 incubated for1hwithrabbit anti-Rab 5 antisera (1:1000), rabbit min in denaturing buffer (0.5% SDSy1% mercaptoethanol). anti-BIP antibody (1 mgyml), rabbit anti-p58 antisera (1:500), rat Digestion was carried out with Endo H or PNGase F for 2 h monoclonal anti-GRP94 (1:1000), or mouse monoclonal anti- at 378C. The reaction was terminated by the addition of PDI antibody (1:10). Then the blots were incubated with a second concentrated SDS sample buffer and boiling for 5 min. antibody labeled with alkaline phosphatase (Promega), and pro- Purification of Recombinant Proteins and Reconstitution with teins were visualized using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phos- Ricin B Chain. After induction with isopropyl b-D-thiogalacto- phateynitro blue tetrazolium solution according to the manufac- side, bacteria were harvested, washed with PBS, resuspended in turer’s instruction. column buffer (20 mM TriszCl, pH 7.5y200 mM NaCly0.1 mM PMSF) and sonicated.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Ricin, Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B
    Analyst PAPER View Article Online View Journal | View Issue Rapid and simultaneous detection of ricin, staphylococcal enterotoxin B and saxitoxin by Cite this: Analyst,2014,139, 5885 chemiluminescence-based microarray immunoassay† a a b b c c A. Szkola, E. M. Linares, S. Worbs, B. G. Dorner, R. Dietrich, E. Martlbauer,¨ R. Niessnera and M. Seidel*a Simultaneous detection of small and large molecules on microarray immunoassays is a challenge that limits some applications in multiplex analysis. This is the case for biosecurity, where fast, cheap and reliable simultaneous detection of proteotoxins and small toxins is needed. Two highly relevant proteotoxins, ricin (60 kDa) and bacterial toxin staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB, 30 kDa) and the small phycotoxin saxitoxin (STX, 0.3 kDa) are potential biological warfare agents and require an analytical tool for simultaneous detection. Proteotoxins are successfully detected by sandwich immunoassays, whereas Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. competitive immunoassays are more suitable for small toxins (<1 kDa). Based on this need, this work provides a novel and efficient solution based on anti-idiotypic antibodies for small molecules to combine both assay principles on one microarray. The biotoxin measurements are performed on a flow-through chemiluminescence microarray platform MCR3 in 18 minutes. The chemiluminescence signal was Received 18th February 2014 amplified by using a poly-horseradish peroxidase complex (polyHRP), resulting in low detection limits: Accepted 3rd September 2014 2.9 Æ 3.1 mgLÀ1 for ricin, 0.1 Æ 0.1 mgLÀ1 for SEB and 2.3 Æ 1.7 mgLÀ1 for STX. The developed multiplex DOI: 10.1039/c4an00345d system for the three biotoxins is completely novel, relevant in the context of biosecurity and establishes www.rsc.org/analyst the basis for research on anti-idiotypic antibodies for microarray immunoassays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Streptococcal and Staphylococcal Exotoxins and Proteases in Human Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections
    toxins Review The Role of Streptococcal and Staphylococcal Exotoxins and Proteases in Human Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections Patience Shumba 1, Srikanth Mairpady Shambat 2 and Nikolai Siemens 1,* 1 Center for Functional Genomics of Microbes, Department of Molecular Genetics and Infection Biology, University of Greifswald, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany; [email protected] 2 Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-3834-420-5711 Received: 20 May 2019; Accepted: 10 June 2019; Published: 11 June 2019 Abstract: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are critical clinical conditions characterized by extensive necrosis of any layer of the soft tissue and systemic toxicity. Group A streptococci (GAS) and Staphylococcus aureus are two major pathogens associated with monomicrobial NSTIs. In the tissue environment, both Gram-positive bacteria secrete a variety of molecules, including pore-forming exotoxins, superantigens, and proteases with cytolytic and immunomodulatory functions. The present review summarizes the current knowledge about streptococcal and staphylococcal toxins in NSTIs with a special focus on their contribution to disease progression, tissue pathology, and immune evasion strategies. Keywords: Streptococcus pyogenes; group A streptococcus; Staphylococcus aureus; skin infections; necrotizing soft tissue infections; pore-forming toxins; superantigens; immunomodulatory proteases; immune responses Key Contribution: Group A streptococcal and Staphylococcus aureus toxins manipulate host physiological and immunological responses to promote disease severity and progression. 1. Introduction Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are rare and represent a more severe rapidly progressing form of soft tissue infections that account for significant morbidity and mortality [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Toxins Fact Sheet
    Work with FACT SHEET Biological Toxins The University of Utah Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) reviews registrations for work with, possession of, use of, and transfer of acute biological toxins (mammalian LD50 <100 µg/kg body weight) or toxins that fall under the Federal Select Agent Guidelines, as well as the organisms, both natural and recombinant, which produce these toxins Toxins Requiring IBC Registration Laboratory Practices Guidelines for working with biological toxins can be found The following toxins require registration with the IBC. The list in Appendix I of the Biosafety in Microbiological and is not comprehensive. Any toxin with an LD50 greater than 100 µg/kg body weight, or on the select agent list requires Biomedical Laboratories registration. Principal investigators should confirm whether or (http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety/publications/bmbl5/i not the toxins they propose to work with require IBC ndex.htm). These are summarized below. registration by contacting the OEHS Biosafety Officer at [email protected] or 801-581-6590. Routine operations with dilute toxin solutions are Abrin conducted using Biosafety Level 2 (BSL2) practices and Aflatoxin these must be detailed in the IBC protocol and will be Bacillus anthracis edema factor verified during the inspection by OEHS staff prior to IBC Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin Botulinum neurotoxins approval. BSL2 Inspection checklists can be found here Brevetoxin (http://oehs.utah.edu/research-safety/biosafety/ Cholera toxin biosafety-laboratory-audits). All personnel working with Clostridium difficile toxin biological toxins or accessing a toxin laboratory must be Clostridium perfringens toxins Conotoxins trained in the theory and practice of the toxins to be used, Dendrotoxin (DTX) with special emphasis on the nature of the hazards Diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS) associated with laboratory operations and should be Diphtheria toxin familiar with the signs and symptoms of toxin exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Toxins As the Potential Tools for Bioterrorism
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Biological Toxins as the Potential Tools for Bioterrorism Edyta Janik 1, Michal Ceremuga 2, Joanna Saluk-Bijak 1 and Michal Bijak 1,* 1 Department of General Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] (E.J.); [email protected] (J.S.-B.) 2 CBRN Reconnaissance and Decontamination Department, Military Institute of Chemistry and Radiometry, Antoniego Chrusciela “Montera” 105, 00-910 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +48-(0)426354336 Received: 3 February 2019; Accepted: 3 March 2019; Published: 8 March 2019 Abstract: Biological toxins are a heterogeneous group produced by living organisms. One dictionary defines them as “Chemicals produced by living organisms that have toxic properties for another organism”. Toxins are very attractive to terrorists for use in acts of bioterrorism. The first reason is that many biological toxins can be obtained very easily. Simple bacterial culturing systems and extraction equipment dedicated to plant toxins are cheap and easily available, and can even be constructed at home. Many toxins affect the nervous systems of mammals by interfering with the transmission of nerve impulses, which gives them their high potential in bioterrorist attacks. Others are responsible for blockage of main cellular metabolism, causing cellular death. Moreover, most toxins act very quickly and are lethal in low doses (LD50 < 25 mg/kg), which are very often lower than chemical warfare agents. For these reasons we decided to prepare this review paper which main aim is to present the high potential of biological toxins as factors of bioterrorism describing the general characteristics, mechanisms of action and treatment of most potent biological toxins.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosafety Level 1 and Rdna Training
    Biosafety Level 1and rDNA Training Office of Biological Safety Biosafety Level 1 and rDNA Training • Difference between Risk Group and Biosafety Level • NIH and UC policy on recombinant DNA • Work conducted at Biosafety Level 1 • UC Code of Conduct for researchers Biosafety Level 1 and rDNA Training What is the difference between risk group and biosafety level? Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • Risk Groups: Assigned to infectious organisms by global agencies (NIH, CDC, WHO, etc.) • In US, only assigned to human pathogens (NIH) • Biosafety Level (BSL): How the organisms are managed/contained (increasing levels of protection) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • RG1: Not associated with disease in healthy adults (non‐pathogenic E. coli; S. cerevisiae) • RG2: Cause diseases not usually serious and are often treatable (S. aureus; Legionella; Toxoplasma gondii) • RG3: Serious diseases that may be treatable (Y. pestis; B. anthracis; Rickettsia rickettsii; HIV) • RG4: Serious diseases with no treatment/cure (Hemorrhagic fever viruses, e.g., Ebola; no bacteria) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐1: Usually corresponds to RG1 – Good microbiological technique – No additional safety equipment required for biological work (may still need chemical/radiation protection) – Ability to destroy recombinant organisms (even if they are RG1) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐2: Same as BSL‐1, PLUS… – Biohazard signs – Protective clothing (lab coat, gloves, eye protection, etc.) – Biosafety cabinet (BSC) for aerosols is recommended but not always required – Negative airflow into room is recommended, but not always required Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐3: Same as BSL‐2, PLUS… – Specialized clothing (respiratory protection, Tyvek, etc.) – Directional air flow is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Penetration of Stratified Mucosa Cytolysins Augment Superantigen
    Cytolysins Augment Superantigen Penetration of Stratified Mucosa Amanda J. Brosnahan, Mary J. Mantz, Christopher A. Squier, Marnie L. Peterson and Patrick M. Schlievert This information is current as of September 25, 2021. J Immunol 2009; 182:2364-2373; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803283 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/182/4/2364 Downloaded from References This article cites 76 articles, 24 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/182/4/2364.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. http://www.jimmunol.org/ • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average by guest on September 25, 2021 Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Cytolysins Augment Superantigen Penetration of Stratified Mucosa1 Amanda J. Brosnahan,* Mary J. Mantz,† Christopher A. Squier,† Marnie L. Peterson,‡ and Patrick M. Schlievert2* Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes colonize mucosal surfaces of the human body to cause disease. A group of virulence factors known as superantigens are produced by both of these organisms that allows them to cause serious diseases from the vaginal (staphylococci) or oral mucosa (streptococci) of the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Cellular Innate Immunity to Cnidarian Pore-Forming Toxins
    Review Response of Cellular Innate Immunity to Cnidarian Pore-Forming Toxins Wei Yuen Yap 1 and Jung Shan Hwang 2,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, School of Science and Technology, Sunway University, No. 5 Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia; [email protected] 2 Department of Medical Sciences, School of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, Sunway University, No. 5 Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +603-7491-8622 (ext. 7414) Academic Editor: Jean-Marc Sabatier Received: 23 August 2018; Accepted: 28 September 2018; Published: 4 October 2018 Abstract: A group of stable, water-soluble and membrane-bound proteins constitute the pore forming toxins (PFTs) in cnidarians. They interact with membranes to physically alter the membrane structure and permeability, resulting in the formation of pores. These lesions on the plasma membrane causes an imbalance of cellular ionic gradients, resulting in swelling of the cell and eventually its rupture. Of all cnidarian PFTs, actinoporins are by far the best studied subgroup with established knowledge of their molecular structure and their mode of pore-forming action. However, the current view of necrotic action by actinoporins may not be the only mechanism that induces cell death since there is increasing evidence showing that pore-forming toxins can induce either necrosis or apoptosis in a cell-type, receptor and dose-dependent manner. In this review, we focus on the response of the cellular immune system to the cnidarian pore-forming toxins and the signaling pathways that might be involved in these cellular responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Botulinum Toxin Ricin Toxin Staph Enterotoxin B
    Botulinum Toxin Ricin Toxin Staph Enterotoxin B Source Source Source Clostridium botulinum, a large gram- Ricinus communis . seeds commonly called .Staphylococcus aureus, a gram-positive cocci positive, spore-forming, anaerobic castor beans bacillus Characteristics Characteristics .Appears as grape-like clusters on Characteristics .Toxin can be disseminated in the form of a Gram stain or as small off-white colonies .Grows anaerobically on Blood Agar and liquid, powder or mist on Blood Agar egg yolk plates .Toxin-producing and non-toxigenic strains Pathogenesis of S. aureus will appear morphologically Pathogenesis .A-chain inactivates ribosomes, identical interrupting protein synthesis .Toxin enters nerve terminals and blocks Pathogenesis release of acetylcholine, blocking .B-chain binds to carbohydrate receptors .Staphylococcus Enterotoxin B (SEB) is a neuro-transmission and resulting in on the cell surface and allows toxin superantigen. Toxin binds to human class muscle paralysis complex to enter cell II MHC molecules causing cytokine Toxicity release and system-wide inflammation Toxicity .Highly toxic by inhalation, ingestion Toxicity .Most lethal of all toxic natural substances and injection .Toxic by inhalation or ingestion .Groups A, B, E (rarely F) cause illness in .Less toxic by ingestion due to digestive humans activity and poor absorption Symptoms .Low dermal toxicity .4-10 h post-ingestion, 3-12 h post-inhalation Symptoms .Flu-like symptoms, fever, chills, .24-36 h (up to 3 d for wound botulism) Symptoms headache, myalgia .Progressive skeletal muscle weakness .18-24 h post exposure .Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea .Symmetrical descending flaccid paralysis .Fever, cough, chest tightness, dyspnea, .Nonproductive cough, chest pain, .Can be confused with stroke, Guillain- cyanosis, gastroenteritis and necrosis; and dyspnea Barre syndrome or myasthenia gravis death in ~72 h .SEB can cause toxic shock syndrome + + + Gram stain Lipase on Ricin plant Castor beans S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Superantigen Isolated from Pathogenic Strains of Streptococcus Pyogenes with Aminoterminal Homology to Staphylococcal Enterotoxins B and C
    A novel superantigen isolated from pathogenic strains of Streptococcus pyogenes with aminoterminal homology to staphylococcal enterotoxins B and C. J A Mollick, … , D Grossman, R R Rich J Clin Invest. 1993;92(2):710-719. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI116641. Research Article Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus) has re-emerged in recent years as a cause of severe human disease. Because extracellular products are involved in streptococcal pathogenesis, we explored the possibility that a disease isolate expresses an uncharacterized superantigen. We screened culture supernatants for superantigen activity with a major histocompatibility complex class II-dependent T cell proliferation assay. Initial fractionation with red dye A chromatography indicated production of a class II-dependent T cell mitogen by a toxic shock-like syndrome (TSLS) strain. The amino terminus of the purified streptococcal superantigen was more homologous to the amino termini of staphylococcal enterotoxins B, C1, and C3 (SEB, SEC1, and SEC3), than to those of pyrogenic exotoxins A, B, C or other streptococcal toxins. The molecule, designated SSA, had the same pattern of class II isotype usage as SEB in T cell proliferation assays. However, it differed in its pattern of human T cell activation, as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction with V beta-specific primers. SSA activated human T cells that express V beta 1, 3, 15 with a minor increase of V beta 5.2-bearing cells, whereas SEB activated V beta 3, 12, 15, and 17-bearing T cells. Immunoblot analysis of 75 disease isolates from several localities detected SSA production only in group A streptococci, and found that SSA is apparently confined to only three clonal […] Find the latest version: https://jci.me/116641/pdf A Novel Superantigen Isolated from Pathogenic Strains of Streptococcus pyogenes with Aminoterminal Homology to Staphylococcal Enterotoxins B and C Joseph A.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Classification of Protein Toxins As a Basis for Bioinformatic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Functional classifcation of protein toxins as a basis for bioinformatic screening Received: 27 July 2017 Surendra S. Negi1, Catherine H. Schein1,2, Gregory S. Ladics3, Henry Mirsky4, Peter Chang4, Accepted: 2 October 2017 Jean-Baptiste Rascle5, John Kough6, Lieven Sterck 7, Sabitha Papineni8, Joseph M. Jez9, Published: xx xx xxxx Lucilia Pereira Mouriès10 & Werner Braun1 Proteins are fundamental to life and exhibit a wide diversity of activities, some of which are toxic. Therefore, assessing whether a specifc protein is safe for consumption in foods and feeds is critical. Simple BLAST searches may reveal homology to a known toxin, when in fact the protein may pose no real danger. Another challenge to answer this question is the lack of curated databases with a representative set of experimentally validated toxins. Here we have systematically analyzed over 10,000 manually curated toxin sequences using sequence clustering, network analysis, and protein domain classifcation. We also developed a functional sequence signature method to distinguish toxic from non-toxic proteins. The current database, combined with motif analysis, can be used by researchers and regulators in a hazard screening capacity to assess the potential of a protein to be toxic at early stages of development. Identifying key signatures of toxicity can also aid in redesigning proteins, so as to maintain their desirable functions while reducing the risk of potential health hazards. Most genetically engineered (GE) food crops involve expressing an introduced protein, thus assessing the safety of the protein is required before commercialization1–4. GE crops are created by introducing gene(s) from one species into a crop plant species to improve the nutritional value, yield, drought resistance, herbicide tolerance or pest resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Staphylococcal Enterotoxins
    Toxins 2010, 2, 2177-2197; doi:10.3390/toxins2082177 OPEN ACCESS toxins ISSN 2072-6651 www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins Review Staphylococcal Enterotoxins Irina V. Pinchuk 1, Ellen J. Beswick 2 and Victor E. Reyes 3,* 1 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0655, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology & Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0366, USA * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-409-772-3824; Fax: +1-409-772-1761. Received: 29 June 2010; in revised form: 9 August 2010 / Accepted: 12 August 2010 / Published: 18 August 2010 Abstract: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a Gram positive bacterium that is carried by about one third of the general population and is responsible for common and serious diseases. These diseases include food poisoning and toxic shock syndrome, which are caused by exotoxins produced by S. aureus. Of the more than 20 Staphylococcal enterotoxins, SEA and SEB are the best characterized and are also regarded as superantigens because of their ability to bind to class II MHC molecules on antigen presenting cells and stimulate large populations of T cells that share variable regions on the chain of the T cell receptor. The result of this massive T cell activation is a cytokine bolus leading to an acute toxic shock. These proteins are highly resistant to denaturation, which allows them to remain intact in contaminated food and trigger disease outbreaks.
    [Show full text]
  • 618 Subpart G—General Exemptions for New Microorganisms
    § 725.370 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–11 Edition) the conditions of the proposed test porting of certain new microorganisms marketing activity. for commercial purposes. (e) Persons applying for a TME must (b) Recipient microorganisms eligible also submit the following information for the tiered exemption from review about the proposed test marketing ac- under this part are listed in § 725.420. tivity: (c) Criteria for the introduced ge- (1) Proposed test marketing activity. (i) netic material contained in the new The maximum quantity of the micro- microorganisms are described in organism which the applicant will § 725.421. manufacture or import for test mar- (d) Physical containment and control keting. (ii) The maximum number of persons technologies are described in § 725.422. who may be provided the microorga- (e) The conditions for the Tier I ex- nism during test marketing. emption are listed in § 725.424. (iii) The maximum number of persons (f) In lieu of complying with subpart who may be exposed to the microorga- D of this part, persons using recipient nism as a result of test marketing, in- microorganisms eligible for the tiered cluding information regarding duration exemption may submit a Tier II ex- and route of such exposures. emption request. The limited reporting (iv) A description of the test mar- requirements for the Tier II exemption, keting activity, including its duration including data requirements, are de- and how it can be distinguished from scribed in §§ 725.450 and 725.455. full-scale commercial production and (g) EPA review procedures for the research and development activities. Tier II exemption are set forth in (2) Health and environmental effects § 725.470.
    [Show full text]