DOCSLIB.ORG

Quinte Region Water Budget, and to Initiate Discussions About Drought Management Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quinte Region Water Budget, and to Initiate Discussions About Drought Management Plans 1 | P a g e Summary Planning for drought in Ontario has become of increasing concern due to the recurrence of droughts, increased development pressure, and anticipated impacts from climate change. Previous work by Quinte Conservation has identified the region to be vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Some of this vulnerability can be attributed to the high percentage of Quinte Region residents (50 percent of the population) that rely on private wells for water supply. These wells are supplied by a shallow fractured bedrock aquifer with low storage capacity requiring regular replenishment from precipitation to maintain adequate levels of supply. In 2016, a widespread historic drought was experienced in the Quinte Conservation watershed and across Eastern Ontario. During this event, groundwater levels and wells experienced historically low levels with many residents’ wells running dry. Farmers struggled to find alternative supplies to sustain crops and livestock, rural fire protection sources dried up, and low river levels resulted in damaged fish habitat. Municipalities that rely 100 percent on private wells had difficulty obtaining alternative sources of water for their residents. Learning from the 2016 experience, Quinte Conservation recognized the need to develop a drought management plan that would help local municipalities mitigate and adapt to drought. With the support of municipalities within its watershed, Quinte Conservation obtained funding through the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM). This funding has been used to improve monitoring to deal with drought, assess the potential impacts of climate change, and prepare the following as a drought management plan. This plan provides an overview of the background information about the Quinte watershed and past impacts from drought. A drought warning plan that follows the protocol of the Ontario Low Water Response Plan is provided, along with amendments, the roles of municipalities and all agencies involved. The recommended actions for each level of drought are summarized with the most important actions being added for normal water conditions. These are the actions that need to be taken to adapt to a changing climate and prepare for drought. For residents on private wells the intent is to lessen the potential impact by identifying sources of backup water supply, storage capacity, water conservation, and water recycling. Actions are also recommended for municipalities to reduce drought impact through their development approval process in accordance with the current Ontario Provincial Policy Statement, under the Planning Act, 2020. This policy indicates that the approval of new developments should be based on sustainability in terms of climate change impacts, and should promote both water conservation and water use efficiency. 2 | P a g e Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................5 2.0 Quinte Region Water Resources & Drought ...................................................................................7 2.1 Settlement Areas ......................................................................................................................7 2.2 Climate Conditions....................................................................................................................9 2.3 Water Resources ......................................................................................................................9 2.3.1 Groundwater ................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.2 Surface Water .................................................................................................................. 12 2.4 Drought .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.4.1 Impacts of Drought........................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Climate Change ....................................................................................................................... 16 3.0 Water Use, Development & Drought Prone Areas ....................................................................... 17 3.1 Settlement Patterns ................................................................................................................ 17 3.2 Population & Growth .............................................................................................................. 18 3.3 Water Use .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.4 Ecological Water Use .............................................................................................................. 22 3.4.1 Watershed Model ............................................................................................................ 23 3.5 Drought Sensitive Regions....................................................................................................... 24 3.6 Dealing with Drought in the Quinte Region .............................................................................. 28 3.6.1 Water Conservation ............................................................................................................. 28 3.6.2 Water Storage/Cisterns ........................................................................................................ 29 3.6.3 Grey Water Recycling Systems ............................................................................................. 30 3.6.4 New Development-Hydrogeological Studies ......................................................................... 31 3.6.5 Large Water Takings ............................................................................................................. 33 3.7 Priority of Water Use .............................................................................................................. 35 4. 0 Drought Plan ............................................................................................................................. 36 4.1 Roles ...................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2 Drought Warning Plan ............................................................................................................ 40 4.2.1 Low Water Thresholds ...................................................................................................... 41 4.2.2 Monitoring for Drought .................................................................................................... 42 4.3 Drought Action Plan ................................................................................................................ 42 4.3.1 Normal Conditions Action Plan ......................................................................................... 44 3 | P a g e 4.3.2 Level 1 Drought Action Plan .............................................................................................. 46 4.3.3 Level 2 Drought Action Plan .............................................................................................. 47 4.3.4 Level 3 Drought Action Plan .............................................................................................. 48 4.3.5 Post Drought Actions ........................................................................................................ 50 4.4 Water Use Conflicts ................................................................................................................ 51 5.0 Drought Plan Consultation ......................................................................................................... 53 5.1 Public Consultation ................................................................................................................. 53 5.1.1 Project Video ................................................................................................................... 53 5.1.2 Advertising for Public Consultation ................................................................................... 54 5.1.3 Drought Project Survey Questionnaire .............................................................................. 56 5.2 Municipal & First Nation Consultation ..................................................................................... 57 Tables & Figures Table 1: Mean Monthly Flows at Select Stream Gauging Stations (2020) 23 Table 2: Drought Impact Risk Matrix 25 Table 3: Low Water Level Triggers, Tools and Actions 41 Figure 1: Quinte Region Primary Watersheds 8 Figure 2: Climagraph for the Quinte Region (1981-2010 Climate Normal) 9 Figure 3: Quinte Region Hydrologic Cycle 10 Figure 4: Limestone Bedrock near Napanee 11 Figure 5: Hydrograph of the Moira River Flow at Foxboro 1915-2018 12 Figure 6: Quinte Region Low Water Conditions (2001 to 2019) 13 Figure 7: Groundwater Hydrograph – Shallow Fractured Bedrock Aquifer 14 Figure 8: Crop Insurance Claims 2016-2018 (Agricorp) 15 Figure 9: Bulk Water Sales (Town of Picton Municipal Bulk Filling Station) 15 Figure 10: Belleville Average Annual Temperatures 1920 – 2100 16 Figure 11: Permit to Take Water Locations (2018) 19 Figure 12: Water Use by Source in the Quinte Region (2019) 20 Figure 13: Drought Risk for Quinte Region Municipalities 27 Figure 14: What
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Ontario Fish Communities and Fisheries
    LAKE ONTARIO FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES: 2013 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LAKE ONTARIO MANAGEMENT UNIT LAKE ONTARIO FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES: 2013 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LAKE ONTARIO MANAGEMENT UNIT Prepared for the Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2014 Lake Committee Meetings Windsor, ON Canada March 24-28, 2014 © 2014, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Picton, Ontario, Canada March 2014 Report ISSN 1201-8449 Please cite this report as follows: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2014. Lake Ontario Fish Communities and Fisheries: 2013 Annual Report of the Lake Ontario Management Unit. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Picton, Ontario, Canada. Report available on the following website: http://www.glfc.org/lakecom/loc/mgmt_unit/index.html TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................................................................. v 1. Status of Fish Communities 1.1 Nearshore Fish Community .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Offshore Pelagic Fish Community ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 Offshore Benthic Fish Community ...................................................................................... 2 2. Index Fishing Projects 2.1 Ganaraska Fishway Rainbow Trout Assessment .................................................................. 3 2.2 Eastern Lake Ontario and Bay of Quinte Fish Community Index Gill Netting
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Eel Movements in the St. Lawrence River – a Collaborative Approach
    Tracking Eel Movements in the St. Lawrence River – a Collaborative Approach Scott Schlueter, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alastair Mathers, Ontario Ministry of Nat. Res. and Forestry Jean Caumartin, Hydro-Quebec Daniel Hatin, Quebec Ministry of Forests, Fauna, and Parks Dr. Thomas Pratt, Fisheries and Oceans – Canada Dr. David Stanley, Ontario Power Generation Dr. Dimitry Gorsky, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Justin Ecret, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Dr. Paul Jacobson, Electrical Power Research Institute Objectives • Long-term Goal: – Increase the number of American Eels outmigrating from Lake Ontario/StLR by reducing turbine mortality (currently ~40%) • A guide, collect, and bypass solution is being investigated/developed to mitigate turbine mortality – 2 collection points considered- Iroquois Water Control Dam and Beauharnois Canal • To inform the development and placement of experimental guidance structures, we need to understand the migration patterns and timing of outmigrating eels Objectives • 2016 Objectives: – Can we track eels downstream? – If so, can we determine path of migration and timing • 2017 Objective: – Determine fine-scale movements of migration in close proximity to the Iroquois and Beauharnois Dams • Ongoing 2018…discuss later… Methods • Eels were captured in the Bay of Quinte by commercial fisherman as part of Ontario Power Generation’s Trap and Transport Program • Eels in BQ are primarily of stocked origin, not wild migrants • VEMCO V13 acoustic tags were surgically implanted • Recovered eels were released off the docks at OMNRF – Glenora Fisheries Station in the Bay of Quinte Characteristics of Tagged Eels • Study animal selection was not random • Large yellow eels >800 mm are targeted • Increases likelihood of migrating in same year as tagged • Silver eels can’t be easily captured in the system • Watershed map You are here • Watershed map Beauharnois Generating Station Moses-Saunder Power Dam Iroquois WCD You are here Ocean Tracking Network – numerous receiver lines throughout lower St.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report
    20 April 2012 CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT Deloro Mine Site Township of Marmora and Lake County of Hastings, Ontario Submitted to: Ms. Patti Doan, Deloro Contract Specialist Ontario Ministry of the Environment Program Services Section 1259 Gardiners Road, Unit 3, PO Box 22032 Kingston, Ontario K7M 8S5 Tel: (613) 540-6827 Fax: (613) 548-6908 REPORT Report Number: 11-1126-0037-4000-R06 Distribution: 6 Copies & 1 PDF - Ontario Ministry of the Environment FINAL 1 Copy & 1 CD - Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport 1 Copy - Era Architects 1 Copy - Ecoplans 1 Copy - Maltby & Associates Inc. 3 copies - Golder Associates Ltd. CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT DELORO MINE SITE, COUNTY OF HASTINGS Project Personnel Project Director Hugh Daechesel, M.A. Project Manager Helen Moore, B.A. Industrial Archaeologists Christopher Andreae, Ph.D., Bode Morin, Ph.D., Jeff Earl Field Staff Marcus Létourneau, Ph.D., Meaghan Rivard, M.A. Project Researcher Christopher Andreae, Ph.D., Meaghan Rivard, M.A. Report Production Christopher Andreae, Ph.D., Meaghan Rivard, M.A., Stacey Carson Geographic Imaging and Drafting Dave Hoskings Administrative Support Stacey Carson, Candice Butler Senior Review Hugh Daechesel, M.A., Principal, Senior Archaeologist Health and Safety Inspector Mario Gervais Ecoplans: Senior Ecologist William Draper Senior Landscape Architect Shannon Baker, OALA, CAPH 20 April 2012 Report No. 11-1126-0037-4000-R06 i CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT DELORO MINE SITE, COUNTY OF HASTINGS ERA Architects: Principal, Architect Edwin Rowse Project Architect Lindsay Reed Maltby & Associates Inc.: Conservator Susan Maltby Acknowledgments Ontario Ministry of the Environment Proponent Contacts Heather Hawthorne, Communications Advisor Patti Doan, Contract Specialist Jim Rodgers, Ontario Clean Water Agency Community Archives, City of Sharon White, MISt Belleville, County of Hastings in partnership with the Hastings County Historical Society Marmora & Lake Public Library Tammie Adams Marmora Historical Society Cathie Jones 20 April 2012 Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
    Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Highlights
    Species Highlights Alewife · Initially strong 1998 year-class reduce by predation (Chapter 1) Chinook salmon · Continued improvement in growth (Chapter 1) · Catch rates in boat fishery good, similar to 1998 (Chapter 8) Eels · Eel counts at Cornwall eel ladder decline further (Chapter 4) · Continued declines in Lake Ontario commercial fish harvest (Chapter 6) Lake trout · Stocked fish survival declines (Chapter 2) · Condition of sub-adults declines (Chapter 2) · Adult abundance declines (Chapter 2) Lake whitefish · Continued poor condition (Chapter 2) · Decline in growth (Chapter 2) · Poor recruitment (Chapter 2) · Continued decline in adult abundance (Chapter 2) · Decline in commercial fishery harvests (Chapter 6) Rainbow trout · Catch and harvest rates in boat fishery good, similar to 1998 (Chapter 8) · Counts at Ganaraska remain low (Chapter 1) · Possible high level of exploitation of Ganaraska population (Chapter 11) · Anglers report creel limit preferences (Chapter 11) Round goby · First evidence for Bay of Quinte colonization (Chapter 3) Smallmouth bass · Continued improvement in year-class strength (Chapter 3) · Increased angling catches in the Bay of Quinte (Chapter 7) Walleye · Continued decline in population (Chapter 3) · Continued decline in open-water angling catch, harvests, and effort (Chapter 7) · Increased harvest in 1999 winter fishery (Chapter 7) · Continued increase in aboriginal spear fishing harvests (Chapter 9) · Decline in commercial harvest in 1999 (Chapter 6) · A summary of what is happening to walleye (Chapter 10) Yellow perch · Increased abundance in the Bay of Quinte (Chapter 3) · Increased abundance in the Thousand Islands, St. Lawrence River (Chapter 4) · Increased commercial harvests in the Bay Quinte, Thousand Islands, and E.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving the Past for the Future
    (News vehicle of the Cloyne and District Historical Society) Cloyne and District Historical Society Box 228 Cloyne, ON K0H 1K0 Tel: 1 (613) 336-6858 E-Mail: [email protected] Copyright, April 2011, Cloyne & District Historical Society Bridge over the Skootamatta River Photo: Historical Society Archives Preserving the Past for the Future Volume 9 #1 April 2011 Chairman’s AGM Report by Carolyn McCulloch The Pioneer Times Vol. 9, No. 1, April 2011 It is my pleasure to report as your President. At the Board’s Strategic Planning meeting in January of 2010 we addressed your frustration in having Finan- Editors and Production Committee cial Reports from our Dec 31 year end, presented at Margaret Axford the Annual Meeting in October of the following year. [email protected] We made the decision to move the Annual General Meeting from the traditional October time to the fol- Carol Morrow lowing March. I wish to thank all the Directors who [email protected] (with your permission) graciously and enthusiastically accepted serving another five months. It is therefore that I report to you for the period from October 19 2009 to March 21 2011. In this, for this one time, we The Pioneer Times is produced semi- have extended our time for an Annual Meeting. annually by the Cloyne and District Histori- We have had had an extraordinary time during this cal Society. It is distributed free-of-charge in period, full of the spirit that it takes to carry out our printed form and by e-mail. http:// mandate: preserving the past for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT QUINTE ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Prepared By
    BAY OF QUINTE REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN MONITORING REPORT #22 PROJECT QUINTE ANNUAL REPORT 2011 prepared by Project Quinte members in support of the Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Summer 2013 Editors Note: This report does not constitute publication. Many of the results are preliminary findings. The information has been provided to assist and guide the Bay of Quinte Remedial Action Plan. The information and findings cannot be used in any manner or quoted without the consent of the individual authors. Individual authors should be contacted prior to any other proposed application of the data herein. PREFACE BAY OF QUINTE REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN MONITORING REPORT #22 2011 PROJECT QUINTE ANNUAL REPORT (Summer 2013) In 1985, the Great Lakes Water Quality Board of the International Joint Commission (IJC) identified 42 Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes basin where the beneficial uses were impaired. The Board recommended that the appropriate jurisdictions and government agencies prepare, submit and implement a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) in each area to restore the water uses. The Bay of Quinte was designated as one of the Areas of concern. Ten of 14 beneficial uses described in Annex 2 of the Great lakes Water Quality Agreement (revised 1987) are impaired. The impaired uses include beach postings, eutrophication or undesirable algae, restrictions on fish consumption, taste and odour problems in drinking water, etc. The contributing factors are excessive phosphorus loadings, persistent toxic contaminants, bacteriological contamination, as well as alterations and destruction of shorelines, wetland and fish habitat. Project Quinte is a long-term, multi-agency research and monitoring project.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlook for Break-Up of Ice on the St.Lawrence Seaway & Lake Erie Issued by the Canadian Ice Service
    OUTLOOK FOR BREAK-UP OF ICE ON THE ST.LAWRENCE SEAWAY & LAKE ERIE ISSUED BY THE CANADIAN ICE SERVICE Issued by Canadian Ice Service of Environment and Climate Change Canada Prepared for The Saint-Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 2 February 2021 CURRENT CONDITIONS Average temperatures over Lake Erie, Lake Ontario, and the Seaway have been well above normal values consistently since the start of the ice season in early November until near the end of January. At the end of January, temperatures were near to below normal. The highest temperature anomalies occurred in the second half of December and first half of January. The table below indicates the departure from normal temperatures at specific locations, on a bi- weekly basis, for the period from mid-November to the end of January: November December January 16 Nov. – 16-30 31 Jan 01-15 16-31 01-15 16-31 Montreal +2.0 ºC +4.0ºC +4.1ºC +6.8ºC +0.9ºC +3.6ºC Kingston +2.8ºC +2.3ºC +3.2ºC +5.4ºC +1.0ºC +2.9ºC Windsor +1.5ºC +1.3ºC +2.0ºC +4.3ºC +1.4ºC +2.2ºC Table 1: Departure from normal temperatures With the warm conditions experienced through November across the southern Great Lakes (Erie and Ontario), no ice formed in November. The first ice was recorded on December 16th in the Bay of Quinte and in sheltered bays in eastern Lake Ontario, which was a week earlier than normal. In Lake Erie, the first ice was seen a week and a half later, on December 26th, in line with climatology.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Flood Forecasting & Warning Program
    2016 Flood Forecasting and Warning Program For more information: www.quinteconservation.ca (613) 968-3434 or (613) 354-3312 RR 2, 2061 Old Highway 2 • Belleville, ON • K8N 4Z2 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act 4 2.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF AGENCIES 5 2.1 Municipal Role 5 2.1.1 Sandbags 5 2.2 Conservation Authority Role 6 2.2.1 Data Collection and Assessment 6 2.3 Provincial Role (Surface Water Monitoring Centre) 7 3.0 FLOOD MESSAGES 9 3.1 TYPES OF FLOOD MESSAGES 10 3.1.1 Water Safety Statement 10 3.1.2 Flood Outlook Statement 10 3.1.3 Flood Watch 10 3.1.4 Flood Warning 10 4.0 FLOOD RESPONSE PROCEDURES 11 4.1 ComMunications and Operations Related to Municipal Emergency Operations Centres 11 5.0 WHERE TO ORDER SAND BAGS 12 6.0 QUINTE CONSERVATION CONTACT INFORMATION 13 6.1 Flood Coordinators 13 6.2 McLeod Dam Operator 13 6.3 Flood Communications 14 Page 1 of 26 7.0 DATA COLLECTION SITES 15 7.1 Moira River Watershed 15 7.2 Napanee River Watershed 15 7.3 Prince Edward County Watershed 15 8.0 EXTREME EVENTS IN QUINTE 22 8.1 Moira River 22 8.2 Salmon River 23 8.3 Napanee River 24 9.0 HIGH RISK AREAS FOR MUNICIPALITIES 25 9.1 Moira RIver Watershed 25 9.2 Napanee Region Watershed 25 9.3 Prince Edward Region Watershed 26 There is a map at the back of this booklet showing high risk flood areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Ontario Fishing Regulations Summary
    130 18 PPetawawaetawawa ! . HHawkesburyawkesbury !(! R ! PPembrokeembroke wa ta Ot AALGONQUINLGONQUIN :;417 Rockland ! 41 18 Fisheries ManagementZone 17 Ontario Portion of Boundary 89 l a 89 i the Ottawa River c ! n Orléans i v o ! r 60 ! VVanieranier AAlexandrialexandria PProvincial Boundary Eganville ! ! 89 ! 1122 RRenfrewenfrew Arnprior! OOttawattawa Casselman ! B FFITZROYI A TZ ! N R C O KKanataanata BBarry'sarry's it MMCNAB Y ! h eL BBayay 132 BAGOT W . 138 1155 :; 417 ! :; :; Nepean LLancasterancaster! BROUGHAM Calabogie GRIFFITH ! BLITHFIELD PAKENHAM S. Nation R. Lake Saint LLYNDOCH Y !Almonte 401 N Francis D O :; Township C Carleton Winchester CCornwallornwall H ! ! BoundaryDARLING Place ! 28 ! MATAWATCHAN NORTH DENBIGH Slate 7 89 CANONTO Mississippi KKemptvilleemptville!(! Falls Township LAVANT 89 ASHBY Lake R. MILLER SOUTH u a Legend Boundary e MMorrisburgorrisburg MAYO CANONTO id ! BBancroftancroft ABINGER Smiths R 416 ! !(! Settlement EFFINGHAM Falls :; ! ! 28 41 ippi R. !( CASHEL siss PPertherth MNRF District Office 89 62 89 Mis 89 LLIMERICK 1188 I . M R Major Road E e R Big Rideau c WOLLASTON I PPrescottrescott n C BON ! e K Lake r Major Railway GRIMSTHORPE ECHO w ! La CHANDOS t SSharbotharbot 401 in Zone Boundary Township a 7 LLakeake 15 S TUDOR NNewboroewboro :; Boundary 89 ! 89 BBrockvillerockville ! Major Lake LAKE Charleston 46 ! Protected Area Fishing Regulations Summary2019 DE Kaladar Lake METHUEN Ontario Portion of the St. Lawrence PUZZLE V a River and Lake n Cordo LAKE R v 2200 s a d i Madoc . c R ! k TTweedweed Saint Francis l d ! e ! . MMarmoraarmora GGananoqueananoque 7 37 ! ! 89 Kingston ! HHavelocka89velock 14 DE 62 . 89 401 R t CCampbellfordam! pbellford ! :; n ! e ! r Stirling TTrent R.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2013 Lasting Connections
    Building Canada’s Largest and Busiest Air Base General Arts and Science Grad Suzanne Marney Television and New Media Grad Melissa Kurtin Lasting Connections Summer 2013 • Profiles Profiles & LOYALIST ALUMNI News News ALUMNI LOYALIST 2013 R E EGE LL CO T SUMM • IS L RIENDS F UMNI AND UMNI AL LASTING CONNECTIONS LASTING CONNECTIONS LOYA FOR MAGAZINE THE ContentsLoyalist President, Maureen Piercy’s Message 1 Post-Graduate Opportunities at Loyalist 2 Alumni Association President, Rosemary Rooke’s Message 3 Building Canada’s Largest and Busiest Air Base 4 General Arts and Science Grad Suzanne Marney 6 Television and New Media Grad Melissa Kurtin 8 page 4 page 6 Thank You to all Loyalist College Donors 10 Waste Not Want Not - Professor Kari Kramp 12 W. Garfield Weston Fellowship Program Q & A 14 East Coast Couple Considers College Second Home 18 Alumni Benefits 21 $6 Million Campaign Goal Within Sight 22 Alumni Social Hour 25 Loyalist Grad and Rogers Toronto TV Producer Melissa Kurtin page 8 LASTING CONNECTIONS is distributed twice EDITOR Kerry Lorimer COVER PHOTO Justin Tang LOYALIST COLLEGE RESPECTS YOUR a year and is available free of charge to all PRIVACY. From time to time the Alumni LASTING CONNECTIONS alumni, staff, faculty and other members of CONTRIBUTORS Association contacts graduates regarding Published through Loyalist College the Loyalist family. Additional copies may be Many articles were written by Loyalist various programs, benefits, and fundraising Advancement and External Relations obtained by contacting the Alumni Office at students in the Public Relations and campaigns for Loyalist College or the 1-800-99ALUMNI.
    [Show full text]