AGENDA ITEM
REPORT TO CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE HEALTH AND WELLBEING JOINT COMMISSIONING GROUP
19 JANUARY 2015
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMME
SUMMARY
This paper provides an update to the CYPHWJCG on the dental health programme in schools.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The CYPHWJCG is asked to consider the update.
DETAIL
1. The previous Children and Young People’s Health and Wellbeing Commissioning Group supported a dental health programme in schools prior to the formation of the revised CYPHWJCG in September 2014. The original paper is attached to this report for information.
2. The project has been commissioned and funded by Public Health. The Public Health team is working in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) to develop and deliver the project. PHE is responsible for providing specialist dental Public Health advice and support and has implemented elements of the programme in other areas.
3. The programme constituted three elements and an update on progress is given in this report.
Tooth brushing programme 4. The tooth brushing programme is to be offered to nursery and reception years in all primary schools. An evaluation of 166 Teesside schools implementing the tooth brushing programme showed a reduction in dental decay that was twice as great in schools with the programme, than schools where the programme was not implemented (Figure 1 below).
5. Presentations have been given to Chairs of Governors and also to Primary Heads (at the SBC Education Matters session) to introduce the programme and encourage engagement. The programme had a positive reception and some Heads signed up for meetings with the Oral Health Promotion team following the presentation. 6. A letter has been sent out to all Heads, together with an information poster to raise awareness in schools.
7. An engagement event is planned for 4th February 2015 for Heads and Foundation Years leads. The event will present examples of how tooth brushing is already working in some schools and give the opportunity for discussion on the practicalities of roll-out and to respond to any concerns.
8. The tooth brushing programme was designed to be rolled out in the schools with the poorest dental health first (quintiles 4 and 5). Initial capacity issues in the Oral Health Promotion team have now been resolved. The programme is now in 13 quintile 4 and 5 schools. Training with the Oral Health Promotion team is planned for the other 11 Q4 and Q5 schools, by the second week of February. Roll-out in the rest of the schools in the Borough (Q1-Q3) is being planned for January - April 2015. All schools will have different practical considerations to enable roll-out e.g. access to enough sinks; and size of the school.
9. Five schools in Q5 have been identified as pilot sites for roll-out in the whole school. The programme will be rolled out in nursery and reception first, but the whole school approach is being discussed in initial meetings with Heads to secure their engagement.
10. A small number of schools have already taken the initiative to roll out the programme beyond nursery and reception e.g. Frederick Nattrass Primary School.
Fluoride varnish programme 11. The fluoride varnish element of the programme is currently being planned for the 20% of schools with the poorest dental health. Schools are being identified which are already implementing the tooth brushing programme, which are in Q4 or Q5 and which have Parent Support Advisors (PSAs) in place to support the programme. The fluoride varnish programme will be implemented in these schools first.
12. Evaluation of the fluoride varnish programme in Middlesbrough (carried out by CHASE at Teesside University) showed that an inherent risk to the programme is drop-off between the rounds of varnish application (application every six months for three years). This is largely due to the need to update the child’s medical history every sixth months and obtain the corresponding signed forms from parents. An important element to ensuring the success of the programme is therefore ensuring schools have sufficient support for this administrative task. Work will be undertaken to identify schools who do not have PSAs and may need this additional support.
13. A Service Level Agreement will be prepared in early 2015 and expressions of interest sought from dental practices who would like to deliver the fluoride varnish programme.
Fissure sealant programme 14. The fissure sealant programme is delivered through a mobile dental van. Options are being sought for the hosting of the van (historically hosted by North tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust) and the future of this element of the programme. The fissure sealant programme is unlikely to be implemented this financial year, due to these logistical issues. Any slippage in the funding will be used to support the implementation of the rest of the programme e.g. support to schools in implementing the fluoride varnish programme.
FINANCIAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS 15. There are no further specific financial / legal implications of this update.
RISK ASSESSMENT 16. This work will help to improve the dental health of children and young people and to reduce inequalities. Risk will be considered as part of implementation and of any options for future commissioning or service development.
COMMUNITY STRATEGY IMPLICATIONS 17. Implementation of the work will have a positive impact on both the Sustainable Community Strategy and Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy themes through positive outcomes the health and wellbeing of children.
CONSULTATION 18. Consultation on the project is ongoing through stakeholder events for a range of relevant parties.
Name of Contact Officer: Sarah Bowman (Consultant in Public Health, SBC) Telephone No: 01642 524296 Email Address: [email protected] Figure 1 AGENDA ITEM
REPORT TO CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE HEALTH AND WELLBEING COMMISSIONING GROUP
27TH NOVEMBER 2013 REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH
CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE’S DENTAL HEALTH
SUMMARY
Children and young people in some areas of Stockton Borough have poor dental health and significant inequalities exist between areas in the Borough. This briefing outlines the plans to help address this situation.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The Children’s Health and Wellbeing Commissioning Group is asked to endorse the plans.
5 DETAIL
1. Dental health is important to help giving children the best start in life – one of the strategic priorities in the Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2012-18. Poor dental health in children and young people can cause significant pain and can impact upon a child’s self-esteem, general wellbeing and education due to potential impacts on school attendance.
2. If good dental health is not maintained, this may have longer-term impacts on health - if dental caries leads to infection, this may impact on the emergence of healthy adult teeth. Ongoing treatment can be unpleasant for the young person and costs to the health system may be significant. There is evidence that gum disease in adulthood can have complications including stroke, diabetes and heart disease.
3. Dental health among children is a good indicator of deprivation and health. The dmft score (% of 5-year old children with decayed, missing or filled teeth) is a well-used and valid method of measuring dental health. Figure 1 shows there is a good correlation between deprivation and dental disease in Stockton Borough.
4. Stockton Borough has a lower average dmft score than the other Tees Local Authority areas but higher than Hartlepool and many other areas across the North East (Figure 2). Average dmft is particularly low in Hartlepool, North Tyneside, Northumberland and Gateshead as the water is naturally fluoridated across Hartlepool and across parts of the other areas.
5. There is significant inequality between Stockton Borough schools regarding dmft (Figure 3). Layfield school has a score of 0% and St. Mary’s 6.67% (partly due to low numbers of children surveyed); whereas in High Clarence school, 72.73% of 5- year old children have decayed, missing or filled teeth by 5 years old and the score in Fred Natrass school is 69.23%.
Figure 1: Deprivation and dental disease in 5-year olds in Stockton Borough (Tees JSNA)
6 Figure 2: Children’s dental decay across the North East (Source: BASCD 2005)
7 Figure 3: Dmft across Stockton Borough primary schools (Source: Dental health survey of 5-years olds, 2011/12)
Disease prevalence (dmft>0, %) in Stockton Borough schools 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
6. Dental disease is preventable. Dmft is a good indicator of diet and nutrition in both the child and their family; the diet of younger children will be greatly influenced by
8 their main care-giver. A high dmft score in young children is most likely due to sugary drinks and / or high-sugar foods.
7. The evidence shows that the best ways of protecting children against poor dental health is a diet low in sugar, promotion of good dental health (regular, effective brushing of teeth) and on a population level, fluoridation of water supplies (Appendix 1). Health promotion messages alone have a limited effect.
8. To address the poor dental health among children and young people in Stockton Borough, Stockton Borough Council Public Health is working with Public Health England to plan a package of three types of intervention (Table 1). The package is based on Marmot’s (2010) principle of proportionate universalism: universal provision, supported by targeted intervention for those with the greatest need. It is supplemented by health promotion messages on adopting a healthy diet, through other Public Health commissioned services such as MoreLife (weight management service for children and young people).
Table 1: Local Action – evidence-based programmes
Intervention Where?
Provision of toothbrushes and Nursery and reception, all primary schools fluoride toothpaste
Application of fluoride varnish In all quintile 5 primary schools (based on dmft prevalence) i.e. the 20% with worst dental health
Fissure sealant programme in In all children needing this in quintile 4 and 5 primary year 6 (as adult teeth emerge) schools (based on dmft prevalence) i.e. the 40% with worst dental health
9. Dental Public Health sits within Public Health England (PHE) and Local Authorities are responsible for dental health promotion. Pilot work carried out by PHE in Middlesbrough showed a significant improvement in the dental health of children where a tooth brushing scheme was introduced in primary schools (Appendix 2). This involved provision of a toothbrush and toothpaste to children and the support of schools to encourage toothbrushing once a day while children were at school.
10. Fluoride varnish is a widely-used fluoride preparation, applied directly to the surface of the teeth. Its effectiveness has been established - a Cochrane review (2002) showed that application twice a year was associated with 46% reduction in decayed surfaces in both primary and permanent teeth of children. This was irrespective of their baseline decay severity or their background exposure to other sources of fluoridation. As well as preventing tooth decay, fluoride varnish also slows down the progression of established decay.
9 11. The fissure sealant programme involves the sealing of cracks and fissures in teeth by the application of a safe plastic coating, painted onto the chewing surfaces of back teeth. This has a longer term effect if applied as adult teeth begin to emerge, so the programme will focus on year 6 children in the 40% of schools with the worst dental health.
12. The total estimated cost of the programme is £75,000 and is to be met through the Public Health ring-fenced grant. Exact costs are being calculated based on the most recent data and approximate breakdown is as follows:
Toothbrushing scheme: £10,000
Fluoride varnish: £37,500
Fissure sealant: £27,500
13. Operational planning will take place in close partnership with schools, using the pilot studies as examples.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
10. The approximate cost of the work is £75,000, which is to be funded from the Public Health ring-fenced grant.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
11. There are no specific legal implications of this proposal.
RISK ASSESSMENT
12. Services delivering the interventions have their own risk management processes in place. Communications plans will be inherent in the implementation of the interventions.
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY STRATEGY IMPLICATIONS
13. The work will support implementation of both the Sustainable Community Strategy and the Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy.
CONSULTATION
14. Consultation is an integral part of the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment process on which these plans are based. Consultation with schools will be an integral part of the implementation of the plans.
10 Name of Contact Officer: Sarah Bowman Post Title: Consultant in Public Health Telephone No: 01642 526828 Email address: [email protected] Appendix 1: Dental disease and fluoridation of water supplies (Source: Jones and Worthington, Nature 2005)
Levels of dental disease (as measured by dmft) are lower where water supplies are fluoridated, than where they are unfluoridated, and fluoridation has a particularly positive impact where deprivation is higher. I.e. water fluoridation reduces dental disease and also reduces inequalities in dental disease. The impact of artificial water fluoridation is less than in areas where water is naturally fluoridated, as levels of fluoride are lower where water is artificially fluoridated.
11 Appendix 2: Results of the toothbrushing pilot in Tees schools
The mean dmft was lower in primary schools which had received the intervention, than in schools which had not. Analysis showed this difference to be statistically significant.
12