802.15 Tg3c Meeting Minutes, Hawaii

March, 2006 IEEE P802.15-06/061r10 IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area Networks

Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Title 802.15 TG3c Meeting Minutes, Hawaii

Date [7 March 200616 November, 2005] Submitted

Source [Su-Khiong Yong] Voice:[+82-31-280-9581] [Samsung] [P. O. Box 111 Suwon, Korea] E-mail:[[email protected]] [Hideto Ikeda] [Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.] Voice:[+81-46-847-5149] [3-4, Hikari-no-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239-0847, Japan] E-mail:[ [email protected] ] Re: []

Abstract [Minutes of Task Group 3c in Hawaii]

Purpose [Minutes of Task Group 3c in Hawaii]

Notice This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.

Release The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

Submission Page 1 S. K. Yong and H. Ikeda March, 2006 IEEE P802.15-06/061r10 Monday 16 January, 2006. 2-hour slot 1.

1.1 10:30 Meeting called to order by Reed Fisher, TG3c Chair.

1.2 06/015r0, Reed Fisher, “Opening Introduction,” review of TG3c scope and IEEE Policies and Procedures

1.3 Review old Business: 05/696r0, The TG3c Vancouver meeting minutes were reviewed. Motion to approve by J. Gilb and seconded by R. Wilson. The Ballot outcome was 16 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain. The Vancouver meeting minutes were approved.

1.4 Approval of Agenda: 05/741r3, The TG3c agenda was reviewed and updated. Motion to approve the updated agenda, by J. Gilb, and seconded by R. Wilson. The Ballot outcome was 18 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain. The Motion was approved.

1.5 05/439r6, CFI response werewas reviewedupdated, now with 25 intents. CFI closed on 11 Dec 2005.

1.6 05/430r5, A. Seyedi, Chair of Technical Requirements Sub-Group, “Update of Selection Criteria Document”. Updates on the Selection Criteria Document were carried out. An updated list of action items was also produced.

1.7 06/0018r0, C. T. Chou, “MAC in Wireless PAN Using Directional Antennas”. Followed by discussions.

1.8 05/0560r2, J. Gilb, “Interference Model for 802.16”. Summary of interference model for 802.16. Suggested model for TG3c PHY.

1.9 Recess at 12.15.

Monday, 16 January 2006. 2-hour slot 2.

1.2 05/0493r19, A. Seyedi, “TG3c Selection Criteria,” Discussions on the Selection Criteria Document:

 Alternate PHY required MAC enhancements and Modifications; Straw poll to keep the “It is preferred that the MAC supplements be additions to the existing MAC

Submission Page 2 S. K. Yong and H. Ikeda March, 2006 IEEE P802.15-06/061r10 which…a particular function”, yes 5, no 5, abstain 0. Discussions continued but no resolution was made.  IEEE 802.16 co-existence model, a parameter set and text were added to this section.  PER is changed from 8% to 1%.

1.3 06/003r0, B.Gaucher, “Completely Integrated 60 GHz ISM Band Front End Chip Set and Test Results”. Update of IBM work on SiGe BiCMOS 8HP technology.

1.4 06/007r0, I. Toyoda, “Single Carrier PHY for 60-GHz WPAN”. Recommend MSK modulation. Re: Hirose 03/465.

1.5 05/671r0, K. Kim (for W. Lee), “Status of 60GHz Unlicensed Band Korean Regulation”. An overview of the regulatory requirements in Korea. RAPA (Radio Promotion Association).

Tuesday, 17 January, 2006. 2-hour slot 3.

1.2 06/037r0, A. Mathew, “Channel Model Status Report”. Update of channel modeling work. 35 teleconference calls. , 1.3 06/012r1, H. Ogawa, “Angle of Arrival Measurement in Home and Office Environments”.

1.4 06/042r0, W. Li, “Characterization and modeling of the 60 GHz indoor channel in the office and residential environments.”

1.5 06/043r0, W. Li, “Analysis of the angular characteristics in the 60 GHz indoor propagation channel.”

1.6 06/022r1, A. Sadri, “IMST data Analysis.”

1.7 06/038r1, K. P. Kim (for W. Lee), “Multipath Channel Modeling for 60GHz Frequency Band.”

Tuesday, 17 January, 2006. 2-hour slot 4.

Submission Page 3 S. K. Yong and H. Ikeda March, 2006 IEEE P802.15-06/061r10

1.10 06/040r0, S. Skafidas, “Desktop Channel Measurements and Models.” SV model was used.

1.11 06/043r0, S. Skafidas, “Corridor Channel Measurements and Models.”

1.12 06/009r0, S. H. Wong, “Channel Model Literature Summary and Capacity Calculations.”

1.13 06/037r0, A. Mathew, “Discussion on Channel Modeling Works.”

1.14 06/044r0, Günter Kleindl, “60GHz Regulation in Germany.”

1.15 Recess at 12.30

Wednesday, 18 January, 2006. 2-hour slot 5.

1.2 05/692r1, A. Seyedi, “Discussion on Down Selection Process,” review the previously defined Down Selection Process. Suggestion to get confirmation vote within TG after forced merging. If the confirmation vote is less than 75%, then TG3c will ask the 802.15 WG to withdraw the TG3c PAR.

1.3 05/591r1, A. Mathew, “Regulatory Requirements,” Update on the changes in the worldwide requirements. Sheung Li gave an update on the regulatory issues in Europe.

1.4 A. Sadri proposed to convene an ad-hoc meeting to draft a Usage Model Document (UMD), based on I. Gifford’s draft MRD (Market Requirement Document). A straw poll outcome was 8 Yes, 2 No and 0 Abstain.

1.5 Recess at 08.45

Wedenesday 18 January, 2006. 2-hour slot 6.

1.2 06/055r1, A. Sadri, “802.15 TG3c Meeting Minutes, Hawaii (UMD), Draft”. Review of the draft UMD. Set up a weekly teleconference call to draft and review the UMD. Currently scheduled on Wednesday 5pm pacific time. The 802.11-03.802r23 document will serve as a starting point.

1.3 06/0048r1, R. Fisher, “TG3c Call for Proposals,” Presentation and review of the draft CFP.

Submission Page 4 S. K. Yong and H. Ikeda March, 2006 IEEE P802.15-06/061r10 1.4 Recess at 17.02

Wednesday 18 January, 2006. 2-hour slot 7.

1.2 05/0311r5, A. Seyedi, “TG3c Project Plan”. The issuance of CFP and channel model moved from March to May.

1.3 05/0692r3, A. Seyedi, “TG3c down selection procedure,” continued to review the down selection procedures. Motion to approve the TG3c down selection procedure document by T. Pollock and seconded by A. Mathew. Ballot outcome was 11 yes, 0 no and 1 abstain.

1.4.06/060r0, H. Ikeda, “TG3c Closing Report”. Motion by S. K. Yong to approve the closing report. Seconded by A. Seyedi. Ballot outcome was 9 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain. The Motion was carried.

1.5 Motion by A. Seyedi to adjourn. Seconded by S. K. Yong. Ballot outcome was 10 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain. The Motion was carried

1.6 Meeting adjourned at 18.00 by Reed Fisher.

Submission Page 5 S. K. Yong and H. Ikeda