Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High

Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High Interim SQA Pre Appeal Whole School Reports

Purpose of reports These reports provide staff development materials to support self-evaluation and improvement processes in schools. They should be used in conjunction with our supporting documents:-

 ‘SQA Analysis and Links to Learning and Teaching’ and

 ‘Interpretation Guidance 2012’. There are also materials on the ScotXed website to help users interpret the statistics. Reports Important Note These are interim reports, and will be replaced once we have all the corrected data from Scotxed. Please note the following:-

 Comparator schools data used in creating boxplots have been based on those used in our 2011 post appeal reports. The data have been updated to exclude closed schools. As a result the data, and consequently the boxplots, differ from those in the initial version of STACs.

 Points profile and staying on rate data are incomplete because the relevant datasets have yet to be published by ScotXed.

 Data that are missing from course reports will also be missing from the summary tables in this report. What’s New Some changes have been made to the style of the Highlight Reports. The most obvious change is the separation of the S4 Subject Aggregate highlights from the S4 Course highlights. Also, the text formatting used to highlight some rows in the Course Summary section have been revised so that they can be distinguished when the reports are printed in monochrome. More detailed information about this report is provided in the document Interpretation Guidance 2012. Copyright notice The copyright owners grant the right to the Schools and Education Authorities, which are the subject of the report, to copy and to use this document for internal purposes only. The Freedom of Information Scotland Act 2002 does not convey a right to re-use this information in a way that would infringe this copyright, for example by issuing copies to the public or for inclusion in commercial publications. It does not however exempt authorities from disclosing this information if a FOI request is made, unless data in the reports relate to small numbers of pupils and so may allow the identification of individuals. Recipients of the information, however, will not be able to reproduce that information without seeking permission from the copyright holders. Since much of the data are derived from STACS, the use of these reports is also subject to the ScotXed protocol. It is the responsibility of the users of these reports to ensure that they are familiar with the protocol and abide by its provisions. Data Sources The major source of data for the reports is the STACs online system published by SGED. We also rely on a further set of data that are only provided by ScotXed as additional data files. A limited number of statistics are derived from candidate level data that have been provided by SQA to schools and authorities for the generation of the August reports. These are combined with the candidates’ stage and gender data provided by schools via the LA. For example, the scatterplots that are included in course reports are created from such data and are not identical in appearance to those published on the STACs system. Another example are the S4 Subject Aggregate RV statistics for which there are no equivalents in STACs. This report also provides contextual data, including information on free meal registration and attendance and absence. Note that the most recently published data on attendance and absence relate to the 2009-10 academic session. These data are published by SGED outwith the ScotXed publication framework.

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 1 Background Data School Roll 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 S4 39 33 26 36 26 30 30 27 S5 Sep 35 30 26 22 33 24 28 All S5 Jan 30 29 24 21 33 22 28 22 S6 11 15 18 17 16 24 16 19 S1-S6 181 164 164 160 164 164 153 122 S4 15 15 16 21 15 15 10 15 S5 Sep 18 10 13 13 19 14 15 Male S5 Jan 14 10 12 12 19 12 15 7 S6 4 7 4 8 9 12 10 9 S1-S6 87 80 85 80 84 80 77 67 S4 24 18 10 15 11 15 20 12 S5 Sep 17 20 13 9 14 10 13 Female S5 Jan 16 19 12 9 14 10 13 15 S6 7 8 14 9 7 12 6 10 S1-S6 94 84 79 80 80 84 76 55

Staying on Rates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Sept S5 100 6 5 2 1 1 1 103 77 79 85 92 92 93 80 All Jan S5 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 88 74 73 81 92 85 93 73 Sept S6 10 9 5 3 2 3 5 37 43 60 65 73 73 67 68 Sept S5 1 8 2 3 1 1 100 95 67 87 81 90 93 100 80 Male Jan S5 2 3 1 2 1 3 100 74 67 80 75 90 80 100 70 Sept S6 7 9 9 3 2 5 3 44 39 40 62 69 63 71 60 Sept S5 100 5 9 2 1 2 5 113 83 72 90 93 91 87 80 Female Jan S5 100 3 6 1 1 1 3 107 79 67 90 93 91 87 75 Sept S6 10 9 3 3 1 1 8 33 47 70 69 78 86 60 77

Free Meal Entitlement (FME), Attendance, Absence and Exclusions NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 FME 10 10 9 9 10 * 4.3 4.4 5.1 4.4 * 3.9 * Attendance 3 4 4 3 3 2 1 92.8 91.7 91.8 93.1 93.3 93.3 94.7 * Auth Absence 5 4 3 4 6 5 8 7.1 8.1 7.9 6.7 5.8 6.3 5.0 * Unauth Absence 10 9 9 10 7 10 10 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 * Temp Exclusions 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 * Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High Cumulative Whole School Attainment By end of S4 The following tables show percentages of pupils gaining awards at the stated levels by the end of S4. Percentages are based on the relevant S4 roll. All Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng Lev 3 3 3 100 3 100 8 5 100 97 97 104 97 100 93 97 100 Maths Lev 3 100 6 100 3 100 8 5 100 100 94 104 97 100 93 97 100 Eng & Maths 2 5 100 2 100 6 4 100 97 94 104 97 100 93 97 100 5+ Level 3 100 2 100 2 100 6 3 100 100 97 104 97 100 93 97 100 5+ Level 4 100 1 100 1 100 2 2 3 100 97 100 94 100 90 90 89 5+ Level 5 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 6 44 48 42 50 46 43 50 33 1+ Level 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

Male Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng Lev 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 9 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 100 Maths Lev 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 9 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 100 Eng & Maths 100 100 100 100 100 100 8 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 100 5+ Level 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 7 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 100 5+ Level 4 100 100 1 100 100 1 5 3 100 100 94 100 100 93 80 87 5+ Level 5 6 1 5 2 4 3 6 6 27 67 31 43 33 40 30 27 1+ Level 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7

Female Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng Lev 3 6 7 100 8 100 10 100 100 96 94 110 93 100 87 100 100 Maths Lev 3 100 8 100 7 100 10 100 100 100 89 110 93 100 87 100 100 Eng & Maths 4 8 100 6 100 9 100 100 96 89 110 93 100 87 100 100 5+ Level 3 100 4 100 5 100 9 100 100 100 94 110 93 100 87 100 100 5+ Level 4 100 1 100 3 100 4 1 2 100 94 110 87 100 87 95 92 5+ Level 5 2 7 1 1 1 4 2 5 54 33 60 60 64 47 60 42 1+ Level 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 3 By the end of S5 The following tables show percentages of pupils gaining awards at the stated levels by the end of S5. Percentages are based on the relevant S4 roll. All Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng & Maths 100 3 5 100 100 100 7 100 103 97 94 108 100 100 93 100 5+ Level 3 100 100 2 100 2 100 6 3 103 103 97 108 97 100 93 97 5+ Level 4 1 100 1 100 1 100 3 2 97 103 97 104 94 100 90 93 5+ Level 5 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 56 59 70 62 69 77 73 73 1+ Level 6 5 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 41 54 48 50 67 62 53 57 3+ Level 6 7 4 3 3 3 2 5 8 15 26 27 27 31 38 27 17 5+ Level 6 9 4 5 2 6 4 4 8 3 10 9 19 8 12 13 7 1+ Level 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Male Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng & Maths 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 5+ Level 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 8 100 107 100 100 100 100 100 90 5+ Level 4 100 100 100 1 100 100 1 6 100 107 100 94 100 100 93 80 5+ Level 5 6 7 1 2 1 1 1 1 37 33 80 56 62 67 73 70 1+ Level 6 9 5 1 4 2 2 1 1 16 33 67 38 52 53 60 60 3+ Level 6 8 7 1 3 7 2 2 9 11 13 33 25 14 33 33 10 5+ Level 6 0 0 2 2 4 6 2 0 0 0 13 13 10 7 20 0 1+ Level 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Female Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng & Maths 100 4 8 100 100 100 10 100 107 96 89 120 100 100 87 100 5+ Level 3 100 100 5 100 5 100 9 100 107 100 94 120 93 100 87 100 5+ Level 4 2 100 2 100 4 100 5 100 93 100 94 120 87 100 87 100 5+ Level 5 1 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 80 75 61 70 80 91 73 75 1+ Level 6 1 1 8 1 1 1 6 4 73 67 33 70 87 73 47 55 3+ Level 6 6 3 6 4 1 2 8 8 20 33 22 30 53 45 20 20 5+ Level 6 7 3 8 1 7 3 8 6 7 17 6 30 7 18 7 10 1+ Level 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High

By the end of S6 The following tables show percentages of pupils gaining awards at the stated levels by the end of S6. Percentages are based on the relevant S4 roll. All Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng & Maths 100 100 3 3 100 100 100 5 103 106 97 97 108 100 100 97 5+ Level 3 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 6 103 106 103 97 108 100 100 93 5+ Level 4 100 100 100 1 100 1 100 3 103 100 103 97 104 97 100 90 5+ Level 5 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 71 62 64 70 69 78 81 80 1+ Level 6 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 74 47 56 64 69 75 77 73 3+ Level 6 2 5 3 2 4 2 1 5 42 29 36 45 35 47 58 37 5+ Level 6 6 10 5 3 4 4 3 5 16 6 18 24 23 25 31 23 1+ Level 7 4 0 6 5 2 3 1 2 13 0 10 12 23 19 31 23

Male Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng & Maths 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 107 5+ Level 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 107 100 100 100 100 100 5+ Level 4 100 100 100 100 1 100 100 2 100 100 107 100 94 100 100 93 5+ Level 5 3 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 55 42 40 80 69 71 73 73 1+ Level 6 1 10 4 1 1 1 1 1 64 16 40 73 69 62 67 73 3+ Level 6 1 8 9 1 4 5 1 4 45 16 13 53 31 29 53 33 5+ Level 6 4 9 9 2 4 7 3 2 18 5 7 27 19 14 27 33 1+ Level 7 2 0 0 3 8 6 1 1 18 0 0 13 6 10 33 27

Female Candidates NCD Percentage 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Eng & Maths 100 100 5 6 100 100 100 10 105 113 96 94 120 100 100 87 5+ Level 3 100 100 100 5 100 100 100 10 105 113 100 94 120 100 100 87 5+ Level 4 100 100 100 2 100 2 100 5 105 100 100 94 120 93 100 87 5+ Level 5 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 80 87 79 61 70 87 91 87 1+ Level 6 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 2 80 87 67 56 70 93 91 73 3+ Level 6 4 2 2 4 4 1 1 6 40 47 50 39 40 73 64 40 5+ Level 6 7 9 4 5 3 2 3 9 15 7 25 22 30 40 36 13 1+ Level 7 6 0 4 6 1 1 2 4 10 0 17 11 50 33 27 20

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 5 Cumulative Whole School Attainment by Cohort The following tables show NCDs and percentages for pupils gaining awards at the stated levels. Each column shows the values over a three year period. The first row shows attainment by the end of S4, the second row shows attainment by the same cohort by the end of S5 and third row shows attainment by the end of S6. Normally, the three NCD values in a column will be similar. Progress from 5+ SCQF Level 5 by S4 to 5+ SCQF Level 6 by S6 All Candidates NCD Percentage 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 11-12 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 11-12 5+ Level 5 8 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 26 44 48 42 50 46 43 50 by end S4 3+ Level 6 7 4 3 3 3 2 5 8 15 26 27 27 31 38 27 17 by end S5 5+ Level 6 10 5 3 4 4 3 5 6 18 24 23 25 31 23 by end S6

Male Candidates NCD Percentage 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 11-12 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 11-12 5+ Level 5 9 6 1 5 2 4 3 6 16 27 67 31 43 33 40 30 by end S4 3+ Level 6 8 7 1 3 7 2 2 9 11 13 33 25 14 33 33 10 by end S5 5+ Level 6 9 9 2 4 7 3 2 5 7 27 19 14 27 33 by end S6

Female Candidates NCD Percentage 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 11-12 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 11-12 5+ Level 5 5 2 7 1 1 1 4 2 40 54 33 60 60 64 47 60 by end S4 3+ Level 6 6 3 6 4 1 2 8 8 20 33 22 30 53 45 20 20 by end S5 5+ Level 6 9 4 5 3 2 3 9 7 25 22 30 40 36 13 by end S6 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High Whole School Measures - Three Year Averages The following tables show three year averages of percentages of pupils gaining the stated combinations of awards by the end of S6. Percentages are based on the relevant aggregated S4 roll data. All Candidates NCD Percentage 10- 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 12 Eng & Maths 2 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 99 102 102 100 100 101 102 99 5+ Level 3 2 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 99 102 104 102 102 101 102 98 5+ Level 4 1 100 100 100 100 1 100 1 98 100 102 100 101 99 100 96 5+ Level 5 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 77 72 65 65 67 73 76 79 1+ Level 6 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 73 67 59 56 62 69 74 75 3+ Level 6 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 51 43 36 37 39 43 47 47 5+ Level 6 4 6 7 6 4 4 3 4 22 17 13 16 21 24 26 26

Male Candidates NCD Percentage 10- 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 12 Eng & Maths 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 97 100 100 100 100 100 100 102 5+ Level 3 2 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 97 100 102 102 102 100 100 100 5+ Level 4 1 100 100 100 100 1 1 1 97 100 102 102 100 98 98 98 5+ Level 5 1 2 5 3 1 1 1 1 70 58 44 53 63 73 71 73 1+ Level 6 1 3 6 5 1 1 1 1 64 45 36 41 61 67 65 67 3+ Level 6 1 3 6 5 3 2 3 3 48 33 22 27 33 37 37 37 5+ Level 6 2 5 8 7 5 4 5 3 27 18 9 12 17 19 19 24

Female Candidates NCD Percentage 10- 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 10-12 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10 09-11 12 Eng & Maths 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6 100 104 103 100 100 102 106 95 5+ Level 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 5 100 104 105 102 102 102 106 95 5+ Level 4 1 100 100 1 100 100 100 2 98 100 102 98 102 100 103 93 5+ Level 5 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 82 85 81 75 71 72 83 88 1+ Level 6 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 80 85 76 68 63 72 86 85 3+ Level 6 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 53 51 46 46 44 51 61 59 5+ Level 6 6 7 7 6 4 3 2 4 18 17 17 19 25 30 36 29

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 7 5 or more awards at SCQF Level 5 or better by the end of S4 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second lowest since 2001. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 10th out of 12 years. The value for this measure has decreased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern and in most previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 10th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

All Candidates Male Candidates Female Candidates 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % School Comp Ave 56 53 55 55 56 51 49 49 50 52 60 57 60 60 61 Authority 37 36 39 37 41 32 33 32 34 35 41 40 47 40 47

Tobermory High 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4

120 All Candidates Male Candidates Female Candidates

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

There are no PCA data for this school. Comparator schools have been selected using Free Meal Entitlement. The boxplot above shows the distribution of scores of a group of 20 comparator schools, selected using Free Meal Entitlement (FME). The line above the box extends up to the highest value achieved in the group of schools and the line below the box extends down to the lowest value achieved. The box represents the scores between the lower and upper quartiles (ie 50% of the group, and the central line indicates the position of the median score (the average of the 10th and 11th scores). The special characters indicate the value achieved by Tobermory High.

Note that there are fewer than 10 schools with percentage FME greater than Tobermory High. This means that attainment levels can normally be expected to be below the median level indicated by the horizontal line across the box. Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High 5 or more awards at SCQF Level 4 or better by the end of S4 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was above the national pattern and in all previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the lowest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably better than the value for 5+ Level 5. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was above the national pattern and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second lowest since 2011. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in all previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 8th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 9 5 or more awards at SCQF Level 3 or better by the end of S4 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably better than the value for 5+ Level 5. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in all previous years was below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2007. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High English and Maths award at SCQF Level 3 or better by the end of S4 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in most previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably better than the value for 5+ Level 5. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in most previous years was well below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S4 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in most previous years was below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2007. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

All Candidates Male Candidates Female Candidates 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % School Comp Ave 97 98 98 98 98 97 98 98 98 97 97 98 99 98 98 Authority 95 92 93 88 88 94 91 93 87 86 96 93 93 89 91 Eng Lev 3 97 3 100 100 93 8 97 5 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 9 100 100 93 8 100 100 87 10 100 100 100 100 Maths Lev 3 97 3 100 100 93 8 97 5 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 90 9 100 100 93 7 100 100 87 10 100 100 100 100

Tobermory High Eng & Maths by the end of S4

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 11 5 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S5 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was below the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 8th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2011. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well below the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 9th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 5th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High 3 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S5 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second lowest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2011. The value for this measure has decreased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the lowest since 2001. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was below the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 10th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 13 1 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S5 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 7th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2011. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in most previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 4th out of 12 years. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2008. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 10th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High 5 or more awards at SCQF Level 5 or better by the end of S5 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 4th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2011. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 5th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S5 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 8th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 15 1 or more awards at SCQF Level 7 or better by the end of S6 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 3th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 4th out of 12 years. The value for this measure has decreased each year since 2009. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High 5 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S6 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 6th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2004. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably better than the corresponding value for All Candidates. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well below the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 9th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than the corresponding value for All Candidates. The value for this measure has decreased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 17 3 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S6 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern and in all previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 9th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 7th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern and in all previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 9th out of 12 years. The value for this measure has decreased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High 1 or more awards at SCQF Level 6 or better by the end of S6 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 6th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in most previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the second highest since 2004. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 8th out of 12 years. The value for this measure has decreased each year since 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 19 5 or more awards at SCQF Level 5 or better by the end of S6 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 4th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is in line with expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well above the national pattern and in all previous years was above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 4th out of 12 years. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2009. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 4th out of 12 years. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High English and Maths award at SCQF Level 3 or better by the end of S6 All Candidates Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was in line with the national pattern and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is ranked 10th out of 12 years. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than expectations based on the value for 5+ Level 5 by the end of S4 in 2010. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Boys Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 and in most previous years was well above the national pattern. The 2012 value is the highest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably better than the corresponding value for All Candidates. The value for this measure has increased each year since 2003. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools. Girls Attainment by the end of S6 in 2012 was well below the national pattern and in most previous years was below the national pattern. The 2012 value is the lowest since 2001. NCD values indicate that the 2012 value for this measure is notably weaker than the corresponding value for All Candidates. Over the last 5 years attainment has always been in the bottom 25% of comparator schools.

Tobermory High Eng & Maths by the end of S6

0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 21 List of Comparator schools The following table shows the schools with which Tobermory High is compared in the boxplots. Schools are selected using FME data published by SEED in 2012.

School FME NCD Westhill Academy (Abs) 1.0 10 Portlethen Academy (Abs) 2.2 10 Banchory Academy (Abs) 2.2 10 Oldmachar Academy (AbC) 2.2 10 Cults Academy (AbC) 2.3 10 Dunblane High (Sti) 2.6 10 Ellon Academy (Abs) 2.9 10 Jordanhill School (GrA) 2.9 10 Gryffe High School (Ren) 3.6 10 Balerno Community High (Edi) 3.7 10 Alford Academy (Abs) 3.8 10 Bearsden Academy (ED) 3.9 10 Mallaig High (Hig) 3.9 10 Bridge of Don Academy (AbC) 4.0 10 Aberdeen Grammar (AbC) 4.1 10 Boroughmuir High (Edi) 4.1 10 Mackie Academy (Abs) 4.4 10 North Berwick High (EL) 4.4 10 Stromness Academy (Ork) 4.5 10 Kinross High (P&K) 4.7 10 Linlithgow Academy (WL) 4.7 10 Interim Whole School Report 2012 Tobermory High S4 Cumulative Points Profiles

Total Points per Pupil Profile Mean Points per Pupil Profile

100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 Q1 60 Q1 50 Q2 50 Q2 40 Q3 40 Q3 Q4 30 Q4 30 Q5 Q5 20 20 10 10 0 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

School PCA Comparators School PCA Comparators

The following table shows the values used in the above The following table shows the values used in the above chart. Values are percentages of pupils in each of the chart. Values are percentages of pupils in each of the national quintiles. Q1 relates to the 20% of pupils national quintiles. Q1 relates to the 20% of pupils nationally with the highest Total Points by the end of S4. nationally with the highest Mean Points by the end of S4.

School PCA Comparators School PCA Comparators 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 08 09 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 12 Q 14 23 3 13 7 Q 25 23 10 20 11 1 1 Q 47 31 40 37 19 Q 39 27 40 33 33 2 2 Q 22 27 37 33 30 Q 19 31 30 30 11 3 3 Q Q 11 19 10 10 33 11 19 10 10 37 4 4 Q Q 6 0 10 7 11 6 0 10 7 7 5 5

S4 Cumulative Total Points Measures

Percentage of S4 Roll Missing Percentage of S4 Roll with Zero Points Percentage of S4 Roll with 1-25 Total Points

8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 School School School 4 4 4 PCA Ave PCA Ave PCA Ave 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

School PCA

The following table shows the The following table shows the The following table shows the percentage of the S4 roll in the percentage of the S4 roll in the Zero percentage of the S4 roll in the 1-25 Missing category. Points category. Points category.

20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 08 09 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 12 School 5. 0. 3. 3. 0. 0. 0. 3. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. School School 6 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCA Ave PCA Ave PCA Ave

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 23 Interim Course Highlight 2012 Tobermory High Highlight Reports The following tables identify courses and subjects for which the 2012 statistics for All Candidates indicate strengths or weaknesses in aspects of attainment by the end of S4 that may be worth further investigation using the appropriate course reports. Courses or subjects for which patterns are strong are highlighted in green (bold) or red (italic). Courses or subjects which are highlighted for the Current Year show a change pattern value (U or D).

For information about the criteria for inclusion in this table please consult the Guidelines for Interpretation 2012. S4 Courses 2012 Relative Value Incomplete Courses NQ Course Pass Rate Pattern Positive Negative Unusually High Unusually Low Trend SG English, SG Biology Current SG French SG Art & Design Year S4 Subjects 2012 Relative Value Incomplete Courses NQ Course Pass Rate Pattern Positive Negative Unusually High Unusually Low Trend Current Art and Design Year

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 24 Interim Course Highlight 2012 Tobermory High The following tables identify courses for which the 2012 statistics for All Candidates indicate strengths or weaknesses in aspects of attainment in S5 or S5/S6 that may be worth further investigation using the appropriate course reports. Courses for which patterns are strong are highlighted in green (bold) or red (italic). Courses which are highlighted for the Current Year show a change pattern value (U or D). S5 Courses Progression Value Incomplete Courses NQ Course Pass Rate Pattern Positive Negative Unusually High Unusually Low Trend Current H Biology Year

S5/S6 Courses Progression Value Incomplete Courses NQ Course Pass Rate Pattern Positive Negative Unusually High Unusually Low Trend Current H Mathematics, H Music H English Year

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 25 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 1a: S3 Standard Grade 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, Relative Value (RV) and awards at Grades 1-2 for Standard Grade courses taken by pupils in S3 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S3 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades 1-2 are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for RV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for RV.

Entries Relative Value Grades 1-2 Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Points Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 Ma the ma 7 2 50 1 tic s

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 26 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 1b: S4 Standard Grade 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, Relative Value (RV) and awards at Grades 1-2 for Standard Grade courses taken by pupils in S4 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S4 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades 1-2 are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for RV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for RV.

Entries Relative Value Grades 1-2 Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Points Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 0 En 10 . 0. 0. 1 gli 3 4 97 100 29 5+ 4 2 2 26.3 *** * 1 1 3 66 62 52 19 14 0 3 17 23 8 sh 4 7 - Fre 0 0. 0. nc 8 9 7 33 33 10 6 2 2 29.3 . ** 8 1 7 30 71 33 3 5 3 56 45 h 6 2 8 - Ga 0 - 0. 1 elic 2 1 3 47 44 14 9 7 2 24.7 . * 0. 8 4 6 57 79 50 8 6 35 5 (L) 4 1 34 2 Gai dhl 10 19 3 0 67 20 0 2 1 ig Ma 0 the . 0. 0. ma 5 3 3 90 96 27 4 3 2 26.8 5 5 6 30 31 27 8 9 7 0 00 15 tic 6 8 s Bi 0 ol . 0. * 0. 1 3 1 2 43 48 13 5P 8 7 2 26.8 *** 1 4 8 69 54 38 9 5 og 8 44 ** 33 4 6 y 7 Ch 0 em . 0. 0. 7 6 3 30 41 9 7 6 2 29.0 ** 2 3 7 78 70 55 7 7 6 istr 1 47 02 8 y 3 0 Ph . 0. 0. ysi 3 4 5 33 26 10 9 10 2 25.5 5 8 5 60 44 57 6 4 4 4 08 07 cs 6 5 Sci 5 20 6 3 1 0 3 17 1 8 ©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 27 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Entries Relative Value Grades 1-2 Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Points Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 . en 4 ce 2 - Ge 0 ogr 0. 0. 1 2 1 80 59 24 5 4 2 26.8 . 4 3 5 58 60 50 14 9 8 ap 16 39 5 1 hy 4 0 His - . 0. tor 9 3 6 20 37 6 7 3 2 26.8 0. 5 5 1 50 53 80 3 8 8 1 61 y 3 40 7 Ad - mi 0 - nis 0. 1 1 1 47 37 14 1 2 2 25.2 . 0. 1 3 9 64 50 20 9 5 2 tra 17 6 2 41 tio 7 n Cr - aft 0 - - & ** 1 1 1 47 48 14 2 1 2 26.7 . 0. 0. 5 6 4 43 40 54 6 6 7 De * 4 1 58 03 sig 5 n Gr ap 0 - hic . 0. 10 6 8 7 17 15 5 8 2 2 29.1 0. 4 9 60 100 25 3 4 1 Co 3 22 0 4 05 m 9 m Art - & 0 - 0. De 1 3 1 53 56 16 7 1 2 28.4 . 0. 9 1 9 31 75 27 5 9 4 26 sig 3 0 43 n 1 - 0 - - Mu 1 2 5 40 22 12 3 3 2 27.5 . * 0. 0. 8 5 1 58 78 33 7 7 2 sic 7 6 45 60 0 2 Ph 4 1 2 37 44 11 5 4 2 24.2 - 0. 0. 3 1 2 73 82 75 8 1 9 ysi 3 0 06 34 4

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 28 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Entries Relative Value Grades 1-2 Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Points Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 cal Ed . uc 0 ati 4 on

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 29 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 1c: S4 Intermediate 1 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, Relative Value (RV) and awards at Grades A-C for Intermediate 1 courses taken by pupils in S4 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S4 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for RV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for RV.

Entries Relative Value Grades A-C Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Points Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 Ph - - ysi 9 1 22 10 15.5 1. 0. 0 8 0 50 0 3 cs 48 77

Table 1d: S4 Intermediate 2 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, Relative Value (RV) and awards at Grades A-C for Intermediate 2 courses taken by pupils in S4 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S4 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for RV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for RV.

Entries Relative Value Grades A-C Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Points Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 Ph 0. 0. 10 10 ysi 8 9 4 4 36.8 1 100 1 1 99 02 0 0 cs 0

Table 1e: S4 Higher 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, Relative Value (RV) and awards at Grades A-C for Higher courses taken by pupils in S4 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S4 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for RV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for RV.

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 30 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Entries Relative Value Grades A-C Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Points Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 Ma the 10 ma 4 1 0 tic s

Table 1f: S4 Access 3 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries and awards for Access 3 courses taken by pupils in S4 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S4 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards are based on Entries.

Entries Complete Incomplete NCD Percentage Number NCD Percentage Number NCD Percentage Number 2 2 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 0 201 20 Course 2010 2012 2011 2 2010 2012 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 11 12 10 11 0 1 1 1 12 1 0 10 10 Mathematics 9 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 10 10 Physics 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 Music 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 31 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 1g: S4 Subject Aggregate 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on S4 Subject Aggregate Entries, Relative Value (RV) and awards at Level 5 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S4 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Level 5 are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for RV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for RV.

Entries Relative Value SCQF Level 5 Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Gr Equiv Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 0 En . 0. 0. 1 gli 7 7 1 97 100 29 8 9 2 2.44 * 1 1 4 66 62 52 19 14 2 06 17 8 sh . 7 - Fre 0 0. 0. nc 8 9 8 33 33 10 7 10 2 1.99 . 8 1 8 30 71 33 3 5 3 42 34 h . 3 7 - 0 - Ga 0. 1 3 1 0 47 44 14 0 0 2 2.65 . 0. 8 4 0 57 79 50 8 6 elic 12 5 . 1 22 9 - Gai 0 - 0. dhl 3 3 1 10 19 3 5 3 2 2.57 . 0. 0 6 7 0 67 20 0 2 1 19 ig . 5 19 1 Ma - the 0 - 0. ma 9 7 1 93 100 28 8 10 2 2.35 . 0. 6 5 6 29 31 30 8 9 8 02 tic . 1 19 s 7 0 Bio . 0. 0. 1 log 7 1 7 43 48 13 8 8 2 2.34 ** 1 2 6 69 54 38 9 5 6 25 17 4 y . 5 Ch 0 - em . 0. 9 8 6 30 41 9 7 8 2 2.06 * 0. 1 2 5 78 70 55 7 7 6 istr 0 40 . 02 y 9 Ph 5 4 1 33 52 10 5 4 2 2.49 0 - - 3 6 8 60 45 36 6 5 5 ysi . . 0. 0. cs 2 12 12

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 32 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Entries Relative Value SCQF Level 5 Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Gr Equiv Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 7 0 Sci . en 4 20 6 9 3 3 17 1 2 ce . 8 - Ge 0 ogr 0. 0. 1 2 1 80 59 24 8 9 2 2.35 . 4 3 5 58 60 50 14 9 8 ap 04 22 . 2 hy 1 0 His - . 0. tor 10 3 7 20 37 6 5 9 2 2.36 0. 5 5 1 50 53 80 3 8 8 0 53 y . 50 9 Ad - mi 0 - nis 0. 1 1 1 47 37 14 10 9 2 2.63 . 0. 1 2 8 64 50 20 9 5 2 tra 03 . 3 58 tio 7 n Gr ap 0 - hic . 10 6 8 7 17 15 5 5 2 0. 4 1 60 100 25 3 4 1 Co 2 0 . 17 0 m 7 m Pro - du 0 - - ct ** 1 1 1 47 48 14 9 10 2 2.34 . 0. 0. 5 6 4 43 40 54 6 6 7 De * . 2 71 13 sig 7 n Art - an 0 - d 0. 1 3 1 53 56 16 6 10 2 2.12 . 0. 9 1 9 31 75 27 5 9 4 De 09 . 1 50 sig 2 n Mu 1 2 6 43 22 13 6 8 2 2.25 - * - - 8 5 1 54 78 33 7 7 2 sic . 0 0. 0. 0 . 36 45 7

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 33 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Entries Relative Value SCQF Level 5 Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Gr Equiv Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 1 Ph ysi 0 cal . 0. 0. 1 Ed 4 1 2 37 44 11 7 8 2 2.74 3 1 3 73 82 75 8 9 0 00 26 4 uc . 2 ati on

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 34 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 2a: S5 Higher 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, awards at Grades A-C, Relative Value (RV) and Progression Value (PV) for Higher courses taken by pupils in S5/S6 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S5 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for PV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for PV.

Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 4 1. 0. 9 English 3 3 46 10 10 8 31.1 8. 1.48 * * 0.63 1 6 8 77 70 5 09 05 0 3 - 1 2 French 4 28.6 -1.89 2. 10 0 5 93 1 1 10 10 Gaelic (L) 7 3 4 0 8 0 0 0 10 10 Gaidhlig 7 5 1 0 0 2 - - 2 1 1 6 Mathematics 4 5 32 10 6 31.1 9. 0.28 1. -0.37 0. 9 8 56 67 7 0 0 0 7 08 05 2 2 1. 0. 1 6 Biology 5 1 14 3 6 9 30.0 9. 1.87 * -1.09 7 3 25 83 7 59 52 0 7 1 3 - - 1 * 1 8 Chemistry 6 4 14 6 4 8 32.6 0. 0.05 0. -1.04 2. * 4 6 75 50 8 * 0 3 3 95 03 3 1 10 Human Biology 10 4 8. 0.99 0 0 0 0 3 - 1 1 1 * 1. 10 Physics 3 18 5 5 1 6 33.4 0. 1.76 -1.25 2. 100 9 0 0 60 0 * 27 0 5 43 0 0 2 1 2. 1 10 Geography 3 5 14 9 2 4. -1.32 * 0 25 29 0 0 5 0 2 1 1 0. 0. 8 10 History 3 18 5 6 1 7 30.0 8. 0.59 -0.11 6 7 0 80 0 37 30 3 0 5 0 2 1 1 1 0. 10 Administration 1 4 11 5 1 1 23.5 9. 1.25 1.82 100 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 1 0 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 35 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 - 1 1 Graphic 1. 10 3 3 11 9 4 2 7 28.4 5. 1.76 * *** ** 1.05 2. * 100 0 9 0 50 Communication 02 0 3 12 * 0 0 - - 3 1 8 Art & Design 1 5 7 25.1 0.19 0. 0. 8 7 86 2 0 0 15 71 2 - 1 1 1 0. 1 10 Music 5 2 7 4 3 6 29.4 8. -0.87 1. -2.32 100 0 0 50 4 33 0 0 0 07 0 0 2 - 1 1 1 10 Physical Education 2 2 14 1 3 23.5 6. -2.30 * -0.22 0. 0 9 0 0 75 4 0 0 1 94 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 36 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 2b: S5 Intermediate 2 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, awards at Grades A-C, Relative Value (RV) and Progression Value (PV) for Intermediate 2 courses taken by pupils in S5/S6 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S5 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for PV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for PV.

Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 5 * 1. 0. 9 English 1 1 54 11 12 8 23.4 2. 1.22 ** -0.81 1 7 4 80 83 5 * 44 32 1 2 10 10 Gaelic (L) 4 9 2 0 0 10 German 4 0 2 - 4 0. 6 Mathematics 1 1 46 10 10 7 24.0 4. -0.25 0. -0.08 7 6 2 69 80 5 78 0 4 79 2 1 2 0. 10 Biology 3 1 14 5 4. * 0.90 0 3 80 3 20 0 3 0 2 - * - 1 1 Chemistry 1 1 18 1 4 8 23.5 1. -0.58 * 0. -2.40 * 1. 100 0 9 0 0 25 8 9 59 * 79 0 2 - 1 7 10 Physics 7 6 4 5 4 1 5 25.3 6. -0.74 0. -1.97 4 0 0 0 5 0 3 79 0 2 - 1 2. 6 10 Geography 1 1 14 9 3 2 4 23.0 2. -1.07 1. -1.99 6 7 0 50 01 7 0 8 08 0 - 1 1 History 1 18.3 0.08 0. 100 0 0 37 0 2 2 0. Administration 1 1 14 6 2. -1.05 8 3 50 83 7 23 1 2 1 1 Graphic 0. 10 5 4 2 4 22.8 1. 0.26 0.83 100 0 0 Communication 67 0 8 0 0 2 1 1 1 Woodworking 1 1. 1. 10 10 1 2 18 1 3 8 19.3 0. 2.05 0.04 * 100 0 0 0 Skills 4 85 71 0 0 8 * 0 0 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 37 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 - 1 1 1. * 1 10 Art & Design 1 2 18 9 2 2 3 22.8 1. 1.06 ** 1.02 0. 100 0 0 50 12 * 0 0 1 79 0 0 2 - * 1 10 Music 1 7 2 8 19.8 1. -2.91 * *** 2. -1.26 * 0 0 0 0 9 93 * 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 38 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 2c: S5 Intermediate 1 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, awards at Grades A-C, Relative Value (RV) and Progression Value (PV) for Intermediate 1 courses taken by pupils in S5/S6 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S5 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for PV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for PV.

Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 2 3. 10 Mathematics 2 1 21 6 0. ** 1.13 4 0 67 7 67 0 4 0 10 Biology 4 0 10 Chemistry 5 1 0 10 10 Physics 11 5 1 0 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 39 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 3a: S5/S6 Advanced Higher 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, awards at Grades A-C, Relative Value (RV) and Progression Value (PV) for Advanced Higher courses taken by pupils in S5/S6 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S5/S6 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for PV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for PV.

Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 1 0. 2. 10 10 English 6 1 2 7 2 3 3 35.5 3. -0.68 *** 100 0 0 0 15 46 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 Gaelic (L) 1 0 0 10 Gaidhlig 2 1 0 3 - 1 1 0. 5 10 Mathematics 1 1 11 7 2 3 31.6 3. -0.05 * 0. -0.46 8 7 0 60 0 97 0 0 4 55 0 - 1 1 1. 10 Biology 7 2 2 1 31.6 -1.19 * 0. 0 0 0 0 95 0 73 0 3 - - 1 1 1 10 10 Chemistry 7 2 2 5 1 2 33.0 8. -2.32 1. 0.83 1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 14 0 0 3 - 1 1 0. 5 10 Physics 1 1 9 5 2 2 31.6 4. -0.89 * 1. -1.82 9 8 0 50 0 64 0 0 1 47 0 3 - 1 1 0. 10 History 5 1 2 5 2 2 2 35.5 3. 1.47 2. 100 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 12 0 0 2 1 Graphic 0. 3 10 10 1 9 5 3 2 8 28.5 8. -3.09 * 0 Communication 98 3 0 0 4 0 2 1 1 10 Music 1 5 2 5 32.3 8. -1.10 0.49 100 0 0 0 9 0 0 Physical Education 3 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 40 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 3b: S5/S6 Higher 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, awards at Grades A-C, Relative Value (RV) and Progression Value (PV) for Higher courses taken by pupils in S5/S6 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S5/S6 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for PV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for PV.

Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 3 1 0. 0. 7 English 1 3 50 21 16 28.4 7. 0.70 * 0.35 4 6 9 73 56 9 0 24 07 1 7 2 - - 1 1 1 2 10 10 French 9 9 2 2 4 1 28.6 3. -1.92 2. -0.71 0. 10 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 87 50 0 0 1 1 10 10 Gaelic (L) 5 3 6 0 5 0 0 0 10 10 Gaidhlig 5 2 1 0 0 2 - 3 0. 1 7 Mathematics 2 2 32 17 13 9 30.1 8. 0.79 * 0. -0.35 5 6 50 69 2 85 0 1 4 03 2 - 2 0. 1 4 Biology 6 2 11 5 9 9 28.8 9. 0.91 -0.75 0. 10 6 40 67 2 46 0 0 4 26 3 - - 1 * 1 5 Chemistry 7 3 9 13 6 9 30.5 0. -0.37 1. -1.03 2. * 9 6 75 50 5 * 0 4 3 04 07 * 3 - 1 10 Human Biology 10 2 1 8 30.5 8. -1.41 1. 1.23 0 0 0 0 0 59 0 2 - 1 1 * 1. 1 Physics 2 4 16 8 5 7 32.0 8. 1.28 -1.08 2. * 100 9 0 57 40 2 * 01 0 5 32 0 2 - 1 1 * 1. 1 7 10 Geography 4 4 11 4 4 8 28.7 5. -0.01 ** * 0. -1.07 5 0 40 0 * 38 0 5 0 9 77 0 2 1 1 0. 0. 7 10 History 2 16 5 9 2 7 29.3 7. 0.39 -0.51 7 9 0 71 0 08 04 8 0 2 0 2 - 1 1 1 1 0. 10 Administration 2 1 7 1 5 23.5 9. 0.66 1.73 0. 100 0 7 0 60 2 0 46 0 1 15 0 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 41 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 - 1 Graphic * 1. 1 4 16 7 5 3 6 28.4 6. 1.96 -0.40 1. * 100 5 8 0 86 67 Communication * 41 4 96 * 0 2 - - 2 8 Art & Design 10 1 2 6 11 8 26.8 2. 0.26 0. -2.11 0. 6 0 5 0 91 7 3 1 01 33 2 - * 1 1 0. 8 10 Music 2 1 9 6 5 U 8 27.5 4. -0.93 * * * 1. -2.16 * 9 9 0 75 2 40 3 0 4 11 * 0 2 - 1 1 0. 8 10 Physical Education 2 6 11 7 6 3 24.2 5. 0.16 * 0.18 0. 9 9 0 80 0 06 3 0 6 82 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 42 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 3c: S5/S6 Intermediate 2 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, awards at Grades A-C, Relative Value (RV) and Progression Value (PV) for Intermediate 2 courses taken by pupils in S5/S6 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S5/S6 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for PV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for PV.

Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 4 * 1. 0. 9 English 1 1 34 12 17 7 23.2 2. 1.46 * -0.72 1 6 6 80 76 1 * 75 09 2 2 - 1 French 1 5 24.3 -2.33 3. 100 0 54 0 1 10 10 Gaelic (L) 2 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 10 German 2 0 2 - 2 0. 4 Mathematics 1 1 34 14 12 7 23.6 3. -0.87 1. -0.01 10 4 1 73 83 9 88 3 8 17 2 - 1 1 0. 10 Biology 3 2 9 1 5 8 22.5 4. -3.27 * 2. 0.94 0 0 2 0 80 2 27 0 3 40 0 2 - * - 1 1 3 Chemistry 1 1 11 3 5 9 22.3 1. -2.27 * 2. -2.37 * 1. 9 0 0 20 2 0 3 9 66 * 77 2 - - 1 7 10 Physics 8 3 2 5 4 2 5 25.3 6. -0.72 0. -1.84 3. 3 0 6 50 5 0 3 76 32 0 2 - 1 2. 6 10 Geography 1 3 11 5 3 2 4 23.0 2. -1.06 * 1. -1.90 6 8 0 40 05 7 0 9 03 0 - 6 History 3 3 23.3 -1.20 1. 6 7 45 2 - 1 1 Administration 1 1 16 1 7 1 33.0 3. 0.49 -1.01 0. 100 5 5 0 71 71 7 9 02 0 2 1 Graphic 0. 6 10 5 2 3 5 22.5 1. -0.56 0.92 7 0 Communication 14 7 0 8 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 43 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 * 1 1 1 Woodworking 1 1. 1. 10 10 1 1 11 6 5 2 24.8 0. 1.52 * ** 0.01 * 100 0 0 0 Skills 2 74 75 0 0 8 * * 0 0 0 2 - 1 1 1. * 1 10 Art & Design 1 3 11 5 2 2 4 22.8 1. 1.06 ** 1.06 0. 100 0 0 50 13 * 0 0 1 68 0 0 2 - * 1 10 Music 1 7 2 8 19.8 2. -2.87 * ** 2. -1.22 * 0 0 0 0 0 90 * 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 44 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 3d: S5/S6 Intermediate 1 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Entries, awards at Grades A-C, Relative Value (RV) and Progression Value (PV) for Intermediate 1 courses taken by pupils in S5/S6 in the last three years. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S5/S6 roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green (Bold) there is a 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for PV; printing in Red (Italic) indicates a 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for PV.

Progression Value Relative Value Grades A-C Mean S4 Progression Value and Percentage Number Points NCD NCD Percentage Points Asterisk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 20 Course 2011 2011 2012 2010 2010 2011 2010 1 1 10 1 1 1 10 12 1 1 1 11 12 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 3. Mathematics 2 1 14 7 0. * 1.15 4 1 67 86 7 73 4 10 Biology 2 0 10 Chemistry 2 1 0 10 10 Physics 7 2 1 0 0

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 45 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Table 3e: S6 Cumulative Higher 2010 - 2012 This table shows data on Higher attainment by the end of S6. Awards achieved in S5 in the previous diet are included but only the highest award for each candidate is included in cases where there are repeat presentations. Percentages and NCDs for Entries are based on the S5 January roll; percentages and NCDs for awards at Grades A-C are based on Entries. Where a row is shown in Green, Bold Italic, there is a strong 3, 4 or 5 year positive pattern for RV; rows shown in light green indicate other positive patterns or a change from negative to positive RV; rows shown in Red, Bold Italic indicate a strong 3, 4 or 5 year negative pattern for RV; rows shown in light red indicate other negative patterns or a change from positive to negative RV.

Entries Relative Value Grades A-C Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Excl Band Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 0 En . 0. 1 gli 1 1 73 24 1 2 5 4.82 7 4 71 82 17 0 39 4 sh . 2 - Fre 1 - nc 2 1 15 5 3 3 4 4.56 . ** 1. 9 10 60 50 3 2 h . 6 90 0 Ga elic 6 2 50 100 1 3 (L) Gai 10 dhl 6 2 2 0 ig Ma 0 the - . ma 2 1 48 16 1 8 5 3.78 1. 6 8 75 67 12 8 1 tic . 01 4 s - Bio 0 0. log 3 6 27 9 2 2 5 4.73 . 7 5 67 75 6 3 99 y . 4 1 - Ch 0 - em 1 2 30 10 1 8 5 3.38 . 0. 10 4 40 83 4 5 istr . 8 93 y 2 Hu 10 3 1 2 4 - 0 0 0 ma . 1 n .

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 46 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Entries Relative Value Grades A-C Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Excl Band Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 Bio 5 log 1 y - Ph 0 0. ysi 3 1 21 7 1 5 5 3.93 . 8 4 71 86 5 6 57 cs . 3 6 - Ge 0 - ogr 10 5 10 15 5 2 5 5 4.60 . 0. 9 60 100 3 1 ap 0 . 9 59 hy 5 - His 0 - tor 3 1 24 8 5 4 4 4.78 . 0. 5 8 88 75 7 6 y . 0 18 6 Ad mi nis 0. 10 8 2 6.00 100 1 tra 18 0 tio n Gr ap hic 1 Co . 0. m 2 1 15 5 6 4 4 5.09 6 5 80 88 4 7 1 30 mu . 9 nic ati on Art 0 & - . De 1 2 30 10 4 1 5 5.80 0. 8 8 80 80 8 4 1 sig . 26 7 n Mu 4 1 12 4 1 4 6 5.00 - - * 100 10 10 100 4 6 sic . 0 1. 0 0 . 51 5

©AF Consultants, Fyfe Information Technology Ltd, SJ Education Support Services Page 47 Interim Course Summary 2012 Tobermory High Entries Relative Value Grades A-C Pa NCD Percentage Number Mean Excl Band Relative Value and Asterisk Number tt 2 2 Co 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 urs 2010 2012 2012 2 2011 2010 2 2011 11 12 10 10 10 11 1 11 12 11 10 12 10 1 12 e 0 0 0 1 5 Ph ysi - cal 0 1. 10 Ed 1 10 33 11 5 1 5 6.33 . 6 91 100 10 1 15 0 uc . 2 ati 7 on