Appendix 19. SEO Secretarys Report

Appendix 19: SEO Secretary’s Report University Standing Panel (Route A only):

For completion at Step 11:

Section 1: Key Programme Information

Academic Year Please insert academic year Date when PDR completed Please complete with date of final version Programme Award and Title Please complete

Course code Insert course code

SPRDC Approval Date, if Date of approval relevant Have any considerations or YES/NO requirements from SPRDC A negative answer requires explanation been addressed satisfactorily? Programmes Committee Date of approval Approval Date Have any considerations or YES/NO requirements from A negative answer requires explanation Programmes Committee been addressed satisfactorily? Date of the next Internal Subject Date of the scheduled ISR Review Awards (including exit awards) Include the target award and all possible exit awards

FHEQ Level of target award Insert level 4, 5, 6 or 7

Mode of attendance Insert full time/ part time / both

Duration of programme (final award) Specify for different modes of study, as relevant. – full time and part time if applicable

Anticipated number of intakes per year Indicate number and month(s) of intake(s) E.g. 2 – in September and January Approved site(s) for delivery of the Any approved by current or previous visits programme Proposed start date Month and year

School or Division Please complete

Professional body / awarding body Please complete relationship to note Programme Leader Please complete

Date of EA developmental Please complete meeting/ consultation by correspondence External Advisor’s details and date Please complete of final report Name and location of any relevant Please complete Partner Organisation(s) Status of formal written agreement with any relevant Partner Organisation(s) Date of School/ Division sign-off Please complete

Internal Advisor’s details and date of Please complete IA’s Consultation Report including sign- off for progression to validation

Section 2: Process Details

[Note: The following text to be included as standard]: Documentation has been completed in line with the agreed processes for validation. This documentation has now been stored as evidence within the relevant PDR-folder and may be accessed via the following link: [Note: insert link to the PDR-folder]

Prompt: Please include an overview and any specific points about the process and the approaches adopted by the programme team that you would wish to draw to the attention of the USP/ Validation Panel.

Prompt: Where applicable, a statement should be included to indicate that any actions identified at STEP 8: External Scrutiny Meeting have been completed and the documentation updated accordingly.

Prompt: Where applicable, a statement should be included to indicate that any suggestions/comments included within the External/Internal Advisors’ final reports have/ have not been responded to by the programme team and the documentation updated accordingly.

Section 3: Outcomes of the PDR Review Meeting [Note: The following text to be included as standard]: The proposal has been approved at the PDR Review Meeting to go forward to either the University Standing Panel or a Validation Panel [Note: delete as applicable]

[Note: Route A Proposals ONLY - The following text to be included as standard]: The Internal Advisor and SEO Advisor at the PDR Review Meeting recommended that the programme(s) listed in section one be considered for approval by the University Standing Panel (on behalf of the Education Committee and Senate) to run from (Note: SEO Secretary to insert date), subject to the satisfactory operation of the programme(s) confirmed through the University’s quality assurance mechanisms.

The following Features of Good Practice (FGP) were noted:

From the External Advisor’s report:

Insert FGPs identified by the EA From the Internal Advisor’s report:

Insert FGPs identified by the IA

From the School/Division sign-off report:

Insert FGPs identified by the School/Division

The following recommendations were noted: (Programme teams should indicate how recommendations have been considered by providing an update in the next annual Programme Plan) 1. insert

2. insert

3. insert