Data Collection Tool for Submission of the Online Survey

OREGON CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REPORT TITLE I-D Subpart 2 School Year 2006 -2007 Due to technical difficulties the online Consolidated District Performance Report survey does not include Title ID subpart 2. The following Title ID subpart 2 CDPR document will be used in place of the online survey to complete the Title ID subpart 2 portion of the CDPR required by USDE. Please complete and submit this report, via email, to Linda Dunn – [email protected] – by October 31, 2007. Do not mail the report, only email submissions will be accepted.

District:

Title I-D subpart 2 District Coordinator Contact Information:

E-mail:

Phone:

Title I, Part D, Subpart 2

General Data Reporting Form The tables contain annual performance report requirements for the Title I, Part D, Subpart 2, Neglected or Delinquent Education Program for 2006-07 School Year, defined as July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007.

Instructions: District Title I, Part D, Facilities and Students

If the district is contracting educational services from more than one facility include information on all facilities. If the district is using Title ID subpart 2 funding to provide a program for ‘at-risk- students’ within the district report those students in “at-risk-student” column. If the district contracted services and provided an “at-risk-student” program report on both.

In the first column, report the facilities and or programs served with Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 funding. List the names of the facilities and programs by type, including at-risk programs, neglected programs, juvenile correction facilities and juveniles in adult corrections facilities. Juveniles in adult correction facilities, eligible for Title ID subpart 2 assistance, must:  Be eligible for a Free, Appropriate Public Education  The academic program must be: o provided by the district, using district resources, Title ID subpart 2 is a supplemental program o of at least 20 hours per week of academic instruction o comparable with the local district program o aligned with Oregon Content and Achievement Standards

In the second column, indicate the duplicated number of at-risk, neglected, or delinquent students who were admitted to each type of program/facility. A duplicated count is one that counts students each time they were admitted to a facility or program during the reporting year. OREGON CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REPORT TITLE I-D Subpart 2 School Year 2006 -2007

In the third column, enter the average length of stay (in days) for students in each type of facility/program. The average should include multiple visits for students who entered a facility or program more than once during the reporting year.

In the fourth column, indicate the unduplicated number of students admitted to each type of facility/program. An unduplicated count is one that counts students only once, no matter how many times they were admitted to a facility or program, within the reporting year.

Number of Average Number of Facility/Program type Name(s) of facilities Students length of students (Duplicated) stay (days) (Unduplicated) 1. At-Risk Programs support students attending district schools, and are not NA residential or community day programs) 2. Academic Programs for Neglected Children or Youth Provided in residential or Community day programs for students meeting the Title ID definition of neglected 3. Academic Programs in Juvenile Corrections Facilities Residential or community day programs for adjudicated children or youth, may be court ordered after care 4. Academic Programs for Juveniles in adult correctional facilities OREGON CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REPORT TITLE I-D Subpart 2 School Year 2006 -2007 Instructions: Student Demographics Report demographic data on at-risk, neglected or delinquent students who were served under Title I, Part D, Subpart 2. Report the number of students by race/ethnicity, gender, and age.

Student Demographics Number Number in Total Number in in Number in adult Demographics at-risk neglected juvenile correction programs programs corrections facilities All Students 1. American Indian or Native Alaskan 2. Asian or Pacific Islander 3. African American, non- Hispanic 4. Hispanic 5. White, non- Hispanic 6. Student did not report Total of 1-6 must equal “All Students” 7. Male 8. Female Total of 7-8 must equal “All Students” 9. 5–10 years old 10.11-15 years old 11.16-18 years old 12.19 years and older Total of 9-12 must equal “All Students” OREGON CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REPORT TITLE I-D Subpart 2 School Year 2006 -2007 Instructions: Academic/Vocational Outcomes The reported numbers should represent unduplicated counts of students; report only information on a student’s most recent enrollment (e.g. do not double-count a student that earned credits on two separate enrollments). However, students may be counted in more than one outcome category within the same enrollment period (e.g., returned to school and earned high school credits).  Do not leave any blank cells – put  for any category having none  For Section 1 of this table, items 1-3, report the number of neglected programs, juvenile corrections facilities and adult facilities housing juveniles that received Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 funds and awarded at least one high school course credit, one high school diploma, and/or one GED within the reporting year. Section 1 Academic/Vocational Outcomes Number of Number of adult Outcomes Number of Juvenile correction Neglected Corrections facilities housing Programs Facilities juveniles 1. Awarded high school course credit(s) 2. Awarded high school diploma(s) 3. Awarded GED(s)

Section 2.1 For Section 2.1 of this table, items 1 and 2, enter the number of students who attained the following academic outcomes during their time in the facility/program: earned high school course credits and/or were enrolled in a GED program. Report the numbers by program type (e.g., Neglected Programs or Juvenile Corrections.) For Academic & Vocational Outcomes, if the district has more than one facility serving neglected students, combine student data from all facilities for neglected students. If the district has more than one facility serving delinquent students, combine student data from all facilities for delinquent students. If less than 6 students were served in any category use an asterisk (*) in the appropriate cell(s) and add a note at the end of the table. 2. Academic & Number of Students Vocational Outcomes Number in Number in Neglected Programs Juvenile Corrections

Section 2.1 Academic: While in the facility, the number of students who…

1. Earned high school course credits 2. Were enrolled in a GED program OREGON CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REPORT TITLE I-D Subpart 2 School Year 2006 -2007

For Section 2.1 of this table, items 3-7, enter the number of students who attained the following academic outcomes while in a facility/program OR within 30 days after exit: enrolled in a district school, earned a GED, obtained a high school diploma, were accepted into postsecondary education, and/or enrolled in post-secondary education. Report the numbers by program type (e.g., Neglected Programs or Juvenile Corrections).

Number of Students 2. Academic & Vocational Outcomes Number in Number in Neglected Programs Juvenile Corrections

2.1 Academic -- While in the facility or within 30 calendar days after exit, the number of students who…

3. Enrolled in their local district school 4. Earned a GED 5. Obtained high school diploma 6. Were accepted into post- secondary education 7. Enrolled in post-secondary education

Section 2.2 For Section 2.2 of this table, item 1, enter the number of students who attained the following vocational outcome during their time in a facility/program: enrolled in elective job training courses. Report the numbers by program type (e.g., Neglected Programs or Juvenile Corrections).

Number of Students 2. Academic & Vocational Outcomes Number in Number in Neglected Programs Juvenile Corrections

2.2 Vocational ---While in the facility, the number of students who…

1. Enrolled in elective job training courses/programs OREGON CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REPORT TITLE I-D Subpart 2 School Year 2006 -2007

For Section 2.2 of this table, items 2 and 3, enter the number of students who attained the following vocational outcomes while in a facility/program OR within 30 days after exit: enrolled in external job training education, and/or obtained employment. Report the numbers by program type (e.g., Neglected Programs or Juvenile Corrections).

Number of Students

2. Academic & Number in Number in Vocational Outcomes Neglected Programs Juvenile Corrections

2.2 Vocational ----- While in the facility or within 30 calendar days after exit, the number of students who…

2. Enrolled in external job training education 3. Obtained employment

Academic Performance Tables: Reading and Math Instructions: Academic Performance Tables Report the number of long-term Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 students in neglected programs or juvenile corrections who participated in pre- and post-testing in reading and math. Long-term refers to students who were incarcerated for at least 90 consecutive calendar days from July 1, 2006, to June 30, 2007.

The reported numbers should represent unduplicated counts of students; report only information on a student’s most recent testing data. Count each student in only one length of stay category. For each length of stay category, report the data by the following facility or program type: students in neglected programs (N) and students in juvenile corrections (JC).

For item 1, enter the number of students who were in placement during the reporting year for either 90-179 days, 180-270 days, or more than 270 days, by type of facility/ program.

For item 2, enter the number of students reported in item 1 who tested below grade level when they entered the facility or program.

For item 3, enter the number of students reported in item 1 who have data available for both the pre and the post test exams.

For items 4-8, indicate the number of students reported in item 3 who showed either negative change, no change, up to ½ grade level change, up to one grade level change, or more than one grade level change on the pre-post test exam. Students reported in item 3 should not appear in more the one of these change categories. The sum of the numbers reported under each category , in each table, in items 4-8 should = the total of each category in item 3. OREGON CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REPORT TITLE I-D Subpart 2 School Year 2006 -2007 Academic Performance In Reading Number of long-term students In placement for In placement for In placement for Performance Data 90–179 180–270 more than 270 (Based on most recent consecutive consecutive consecutive pre/post-test data) calendar days calendar days calendar days N JC N JC N JC

1. # students who were in placement from July 1, 2006, to June 30, 2007 (in each length- of-stay category) 2. # students from row 1 who tested below grade level upon entry. 3. # students from row 1 who took both the pre- and post-test reading exams 4. # students from row 3 who showed negative grade level change from the pre- to post- test reading exams 5. # students from row 3 who showed no change in grade level from the pre- to post-test reading exams 6. # students from row 3 who showed improvement of up to 1/2 grade level from the pre- to post-test reading exams 7. # students from row 3 who showed improvement of up to one full grade level from the pre- to post-test reading exams 8. # students from row 3 who showed improvement of more than one full grade level from the pre- to post-test reading exams OREGON CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REPORT TITLE I-D Subpart 2 School Year 2006 -2007 Academic Performance In Math Number of long-term students In placement In placement for In placement for for more than 90–179 180–270 270 consecutive consecutive consecutive Performance Data calendar days calendar days calendar days (Based on most recent pre/post-test data) N JC N JC N JC 1. # students who were in placement from July 1, 2006, to June 30, 2007 (in each length- of-stay category) 2. # students from row 1 who tested below grade level upon entry. 3. # students from row 1 who took both the pre- and post-test math exams 4. # students from row 3 who showed negative grade level change from the pre- to post- test math exams 5. # students from row 3 who showed no change in grade level from the pre- to post-test math exams 6. # students from row 3 who showed improvement of up to 1/2 grade level from the pre- to post-test math exams 7. # students from row 3 who showed improvement of up to one full grade level from the pre- to post-test math exams 8. # students from row 3 who showed improvement of more than one full grade level from the pre- to post-test math exams