Online Supplement for Roberson, P. N., Lenger, K. A., Norona, J. C., & Olmstead, S. B

Online supplement for Roberson, P. N., Lenger, K. A., Norona, J. C., & Olmstead, S. B. (2017). A longitudinal examination of the directional effects between relationship quality and well- being for a national sample of U.S. men and women. Sex Roles. Patricia N. E. Roberson, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Email: [email protected]

Table 1s

Skewness and Kurtosis for Relationship Satisfaction, Relationship Conflict, Depression and Life Satisfaction for all Waves 1, 3, and 5 Skewness (SE) Kurtosis (SE) W1 Relationship satisfaction -1.02 (0.05) 0.79 (0.11) W3 Relationship satisfaction -1.00 (0.07) 1.02 (0.14) W5 Relationship satisfaction -1.21 (0.10) 1.56 (0.20) W1 Relationship conflict 0.87 (0.07) -0.04 (0.11) W3 Relationship conflict 0.55 (0.07) -0.44 (0.14) W5 Relationship conflict 0.71 (0.10) -0.28 (0.20) W1 Depression 1.06 (0.05) 0.87 (0.11) W3 Depression 1.57 (0.06) 2.85 (0.13) W5 Depression 1.37 (0.08) 1.63 (0.17) W1 Life satisfaction -0.53 (0.05) 0.10 (0.11) W3 Life satisfaction -0.34 (0.06) -0.08 (0.13) W5 Life satisfaction -0.54 (0.08) 0.25 (0.17) Table 2s

Standardized Indirect Paths for the Cross-Lagged Path Analysis of Life Satisfaction, Relationship Satisfaction, and Conflict and Depression, Relationship Satisfaction, and Conflict Cross-Lagged Path Analysis of Life Satisfaction, Relationship Satisfaction, and Standardized Indirect Conflict Paths (B, SE) W1Life Satisfaction W5 Life Satisfaction 0.15 (0.02)** W1 Life Satisfaction W3 Life Satisfaction W5 Life Satisfaction 0.13 (0.02)** W1 Life Satisfaction W3 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Life Satisfaction 0.02 (0.01)* W1 Relationship Satisfaction  W5 Life Satisfaction 0.15 (0.03)** W1 Relationship Satisfaction W3 Life Satisfaction  W5 Life Satisfaction 0.08 (0.02)* W1 Relationship Satisfaction W3 Relationship Satisfaction  W5 Life Satisfaction 0.07 (0.03)* W1Life Satisfaction  W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.10 (0.03)** W1 Life Satisfaction  W3 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.06 (0.02)** W1 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.21 (.04)** W1 Relationship Satisfaction W3 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.20 (.04)** W1 Conflict W5 Conflict 0.11(0.02)** W1 Conflict W3 Conflict W5 Conflict 0.11(0.02)**  W1 Life Satisfaction W5 Conflict -0.05(0.02)* W1 Life Satisfaction W3 Conflict W5 Conflict -0.05(0.02)* W1 Conflict W5 Relationship Satisfaction -0.04(0.02)* W1 Conflict W3 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Relationship Satisfaction -0.02(0.01)* W1 Conflict W3 Conflict W5 Relationship Satisfaction -0.02(0.01)* Cross-Lagged Path Analysis of Depression, Relationship Standardized Indirect Satisfaction, and Conflict Path Weights (B, SE)

W1DepressionW5Relationship Satisfaction -0.13 (0.03)**

W1DepressionW3 Depression W5 Relationship Satisfaction -0.07 (0.02)*

W1 Depression W3 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Relationship Satisfaction -0.05 (0.02)*

W1Conflict W5 Relationship Satisfaction -0.06 (0.02)**

W1 Depression  W5 Depression 0.23 (0.02)**

W1 Depression  W3 Depression W5Depression 0.23 (0.02)**

W1 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.13 (.03)**

W1 Relationship Satisfaction W3 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.14 (.03)**

W1 Depression  W5 Conflict 0.07(0.03)*

W1 Depression W3Conflict W5 Conflict 0.03 (0.02)*

W1 Conflict  W5 Conflict 0.15(0.03)*

W1 Conflict W3 Conflict W5 Conflict 0.14(0.02)** Note. Non-significant path weights are not presented. RS = relationship satisfaction; C = conflict; LS = life satisfaction.

* p < .05. ** p < .001.

Table 3s

Chi-Square Difference Tests for Life Satisfaction (CLPC) and Depression (CLPC) Chi-square difference Constrained Path Δ2(1) Life Satisfaction (CLPC)

W1Life Satisfaction  W3 Life Satisfaction 4.52*

W1 Relationship Satisfaction  W3 Life Satisfaction 4.38*

W1 Conflict  W3 Life Satisfaction 4.27*

W1Life Satisfaction  W3 Relationship Satisfaction 3.92*

W1 Relationship Satisfaction  W3 Relationship Satisfaction 4.25*

W1 Conflict  W3 Relationship Satisfaction 3.65

W1Life Satisfaction  W3 Conflict 4.24*

W1 Relationship Satisfaction  W3 Conflict 4.12*

W1 Conflict  W3 Conflict 3.68

W3 Life Satisfaction  W5 Life Satisfaction 4.17*

W3 Relationship Satisfaction  W5 Life Satisfaction 4.20*

W3Conflict  W5 Life Satisfaction 4.01*

W3 Life Satisfaction  W5 Relationship Satisfaction 4.10*

W3 Relationship Satisfaction  W5 Relationship Satisfaction 3.85*

W3Conflict  W5 Relationship Satisfaction 3.69

W3 Life Satisfaction W5 Conflict 4.08*

W3 Relationship Satisfaction W5 Conflict 3.76*

W3Conflict W5 Conflict 4.13* Depression (CLPC)

W1 Depression  W3 Depression 0.00

W1 Relationship Satisfaction W3 Depression 0.07

W1 Conflict  W3 Depression 0.94

W1 Depression  W3 Relationship Satisfaction 6.46*

W1 Relationship Satisfaction  W3 Relationship Satisfaction 0.23

W1 Conflict  W3 Relationship Satisfaction 5.52*

W1 Depression  W3Conflict 0.16

W1 Relationship Satisfaction  W3Conflict 0.44

W1 Conflict  W3Conflict 3.96*

W3 Depression  W5 Depression 2.81

W3 Relationship Satisfaction  W5 Depression 4.14*

W3Conflict  W5 Depression 0.08

W3 Depression  W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.81

W3 Relationship Satisfaction  W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.81

W3Conflict  W5 Relationship Satisfaction 0.91

W3 Depression  W5 Conflict 1.78

W3 Relationship Satisfaction  W5 Conflict -6.96

W3Conflict  W5 Conflict 0.13 Note. A significant chi-square test (p < .05) means that men and women differ on the tested path. Unconstrained Model: 2 (18) = 62.46

* p < .05