Transcript of Prezi Re

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transcript of Prezi Re NEYM M&C Presentation on Withholding Policy Transcript of a Prezi by Callid Keefe-Perry and Honor Woodrow on behalf of Yearly Meeting Ministry & Counsel Updated 18 November 2019 Edited for style and formatted by Peter Bishop 10 February 2020 1 2 Table of Contents Preface ..........................................................................................................5 Timeline and Background Information 1988-1991 FUM and NEYM: Structurally ........................................................9 FUM Statement of Sexual Ethics .....................................................9 FUM Personnel Policy ...................................................................10 2000-2005 The First Triennial in Kenya ..........................................................11 FUM Board Not In Unity ...............................................................12 2004 NEYM Minute of Exercise ............................................................13 2007 Joint Meeting of African and North American Friends .................15 2007-2009 NEYM Minute of Commitment .....................................................17 FUM’s Response ............................................................................18 NEYM Minute of Support for Same-Sex Marriages .....................18 NEYM Minute Establishing the Withholding Policy ...................19 2010-2014 Extending the FUM Withholding Practice ....................................20 2015-2019 NEYM Working Group Is Not Formed .........................................21 NEYM M&C’s Charge .................................................................21 2014 Listening Sessions Friends wanting to remain in relationship with FUM ....................25 Friends wanting distance from FUM .............................................25 Support for the NEYM withholding policy ...................................26 Resistance to the NEYM withholding policy ................................26 Sessions 2019 FUM Withholding Mechanism ......................................................27 Minute of Exercise on the YM Relationship with FUM ................27 Financial Data as of 2019 ..........................................................................29 Questions to Inform Our Ongoing Discernment ........................................32 3 4 Preface What is this Presentation? A tool for individual Friends and Meetings to use in preparation for ongoing discernment about New England Yearly Meeting’s Withholding Policy created in response to Friends United Meeting’s Personnel Policy. We hope that is helps Friends to understand and engage with the multiple facets of this complex moment, giving us a all an accessible resource for information, allowing a greater number of people to participate more fully in our collective discernment. Sharing with Ministry and Counsel If your Meeting would be interested in having an M&C-hosted Listening Session happen sometime before May 14, contact [email protected] to see about the availability of Friends who have been asked to travel. If you or your meeting would like to share your perspective with members of NEYM's M&C in preparation for their discernment, all emails sent to [email protected] will be shared at M&C's May 18th Meeting. If you have questions, want clarification, or would like to talk to the Clerk of M&C about this issue, email [email protected] and she will respond. 5 6 Timeline and Background Information 7 8 1988-1991 Summary • FUM Board approves a Personnel Policy Manual which states both that: o Staff and volunteer appointments are made without regard to sexual orientation, and that o It is expected that sexual intercourse should be confined to marriage, understood to be between one man and one woman. (91 GBEX 18) - 1991 • The board is divided. • As a result of the division, the general Secretary of FUM pushed for Yearly Meetings with a more universalist theology to unafiliate with FUM and only seek affiliation with Friends General Conference (FGC)- 1990-1993 Background Information FUM and NEYM: Structurally “The Friends United Meeting community stretches far and wide across the globe. We are a collection of Christ-centered Quakers, embracing thirty-seven Yearly Meetings and Associations, thousands of local gatherings and hundreds of thousands of individuals. Joined together through our shared experience of God and united in common ministries, we form a beloved fellowship that is powerfully at work in our local areas and through cross-cultural service.” Of note: organizations such as Friends United Meeting, Friends General Conference, and Evangelical Friends International, do not hold authority over the constituent Yearly Meetings. FUM Board minute 88 GB 52 FUM Statement of Sexual Ethics (a) We affirm the civil rights of all people to secular employment, housing, education and health care without regard to their sexual orientation. In particular, we condemn violence, whether verbal or physical, against homosexuals, and call for their full protection under the civil rights laws. (b) We reaffirm our traditional testimonies of peace, simplicity, truth speaking, gender and racial equality, personal integrity, fidelity, chastity and community. We recognize that there is diversity among us on issues of sexuality. For the purpose of our corporate life together, we affirm our traditional testimony that sexual intercourse should be confined to the bonds of marriage, which we understand to be between one man and one woman. 9 (c) The lifestyle of volunteers under appointment to Quaker Volunteer Witness, regardless of their sexual orientation, should be in accordance with these testimonies. FUM Minute 91 GBEX 18 FUM Personnel Policy In March 1991, the FUM General Board Executive Committee approved (91 GBEX 18) circulation of an “Organizational and Personnel Policy Manual.” It took the ‘88 policy and extended it as follows: Friends United Meeting holds to the traditional Friends testimonies of peace (nonviolence), simplicity, truth speaking, community, gender and racial equality, chastity, and fidelity in marriage. It is expected that the lifestyle of all staff and volunteer appointees of Friends United Meeting will be in accordance with these testimonies. Friends United Meeting affirms the civil rights of all people. Staff and volunteer appointments are made without regard to sexual orientation. It is expected that sexual intercourse should be confined to marriage, understood to be between one man and one woman. This wording has been retained in all subsequent editions of the FUM Personnel Manual. After Minute 88 GB 52 was approved in 1988 and after the FUM Personnel Manual was adopted by the Executive Committee in 1991, it was recognized that the board was divided. The divisions on the board seemed so great to some that a push for realignment was made between 1990 and 1993 by the General Secretary of FUM. The Secretary felt that the dually affiliated yearly meetings—the reunited Orthodox and Hicksite yearly meetings: Canadian, New England, New York, Baltimore, Southeastern—because of their universalism and because of the fact that many members did not identify as Christian, did not belong in FUM and encouraged them to make Friends General Conference their single affiliation. “Realignment” failed. 10 2000-2005 Summary • FUM held its first triennial overseas—in Nairobi, Kenya. • FUM General Secretary says: "There had been 20 plus names listed for possible worship sharing leaders. We only needed 12. I made a decision not to invite a person in a homosexual relationship to be a worship group leader...." • Years later the clerK and General Secretary found reconciliation: "my handling of the situation [was] inexcusable." • At a later Triennial, the General Secretary publicly named her behavior as “homophobic” and apologized. • Calls came forward from Baltimore Yearly Meeting Friends to the FUM board to reconsider the personnel policy. • The personnel policy was discussed at almost every general board meeting between Fall 2002 and Spring 2005. The board did not find unity to amend the policy or remove it—but it also did not find unity to reaffirm it. Background Information The Situation in 2002 The First Triennial in Kenya In 2002, as part of its effort to become equal partners with Friends in Africa, FUM held its first triennial overseas—in Nairobi, Kenya. No one had ever planned an international triennial before and some things went awry. One of them was that too many people were invited to be worship- sharing group facilitators. Of this situation, FUM’s General Secretary at the time said the following: There had been 20 plus names listed for possible worship sharing leaders. We only needed 12. I made a decision not to invite a person in a homosexual relationship to be a worship group leader. This was not a policy decision; just something I felt was a courtesy to our hosts. I also asked American women to wear skirts rather than pants, but no one reacted to that! It was at the Triennial sessions that I discovered this person had already been asked to serve and subsequently had the invitation withdrawn. This is where the pain comes in. Whether you support the decision I made or not, what is important is the pain and humiliation caused a human being through my actions. And that makes my handling of the situation inexcusable. 11 Upon discovering that the invitation had been extended and then withdrawn, my immediate response was to apologize. Only through the Spirit of God could what I was feeling be honestly transmitted. What I received in return
Recommended publications
  • Quaker Thought and Today
    December 1991 Quaker Thought FRIENDS and Life OURNAL Today MAKING ROOM IN MY INN WORLD GATHERING OF FRIENDS: KENYA REPORT VILLAGE CHRISTMAS Editor-Manager Among Friends Vinton Deming Associate Editor Melissa Kay Elliott Art Director Barbara Benton Finding the spirit Advertising Manager Catherine Frost Circulation and Promotion urely, we think, we'll find inspiration here for this month's column, Nagendran Gulendran something to get the writing started: an essay, perhaps, by a Friend Typesetting Services James Rice and Susan Jordhamo Son "The Meaning of Christmas"; maybe a bit of verse describing a Secretarial Services snowy scene outside the old meetinghouse, a new rendering of the babe in Edward Sargent Bookkeeper the manger story, some holiday message of peace. James Neveil Our search begins in a bound, dusty volume of the first issues of The Volunteers Jane Burgess, Carol Eresian, Anders Hansen, Friend-not the current publication of the same name of London Yearly Emily Conlon Meeting, but the Quaker weekly published in Philadelphia beginning Board of Managers 1989-1992: Jennie Allen (Secretary), Richard Seventh Day, Tenth Month, 13, 1827. It resides on a shelf outside our office Eldridge (Assistant Clerk), Bernard Haviland, near the bound volumes of FRIENDS JOURNAL and issues of our other Eric Larsen, Marcia Mason, Janet Norton, David Samuel, Carolyn Sprogell, Wilmer predecessor, Friends' Intelligencer. Tjossem, Alice Wiser But nothing seasonal catches our eye. In the Seventh Day, Twelfth 1990-1993: Clement Alexandre, Marguerite Clark,
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelical Friend, July/August 1989 (Vol
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Northwest Yearly Meeting of Friends Church Evangelical Friend (Quakers) 7-1989 Evangelical Friend, July/August 1989 (Vol. 22, No. 10/11) Evangelical Friends Alliance Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/nwym_evangelical_friend Recommended Citation Evangelical Friends Alliance, "Evangelical Friend, July/August 1989 (Vol. 22, No. 10/11)" (1989). Evangelical Friend. 229. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/nwym_evangelical_friend/229 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Northwest Yearly Meeting of Friends Church (Quakers) at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Evangelical Friend by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Youth, publishing, pastoral ministry, missions, and more During the past year the editors of Quaker Life and Evangelical Friend have met several times to discuss some ways they might cooperate more actively. From those discussions has come a procedure for exchanging articles which might appropriately appear in each publication. This special joint issue is also a product of that cooperation. The theme, "Friends Today" seemed to fit with the editors' desire to emphasize the ways some of our people are serving the Lord In unusual ways and some of the ways our Friends bodies are working together. We welcome our readers' comments on this joint endeavor. F R 0 M THE EDIT 0 R s This time suspicion wore the name "Protector:' Advocating a platform of doctrinal purity and uprightness of interpretation, suspicion promised to stand at the door to cast out any poten­ Letting Go of tial invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Flavors” of Quakers in the U.S
    “Flavors” of Quakers in the U.S. Today It is hard to delineate clear cut branches of American Quakerism because different branches define themselves differently, and because there is much variation and overlap. You can sort Quakers in several ways: by our qualities and characteristics, by the major affiliating organizations we associate with, or by historical lineage (which group is an offshoot of which other group). These different ways of categorizing us will produce similar, but not identical groups. Following is a rough sorting. Liberal Friends Generally, liberal Friends practice unprogrammed worship, do not have formal clergy, and emphasize the authority of the Light Within. They value universalism, meaning they include members identifying with a variety of theological traditions, such as Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Wicca, and increasingly nontheism. You find them most often in the eastern and western parts of the U.S. and in college towns. There are two major groups of Liberal Friends: ● Those affiliated with Friends General Conference (see www.fgcquaker.org). These meetings ​ ​ often trace their roots back to the Hicksite side of the major division (see historic notes below) but there are other histories mixed in. FGC includes yearly meetings in the U.S. and Canada. ● Independent or Western Friends. Located mostly in the Western part of the United States, these Friends are sometimes called “Beanites,” because they trace their roots, to some degree, to the leadership of Joel and Hannah Bean, who came out of the Orthodox side of the major division, but parted ways. Independent Friends have no affiliating organization, but they do have a magazine, Western Friend (https://westernfriend.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Friends United Meeting
    Quaker Religious Thought Volume 123 The Future of Friends 123-124 combined issue Article 6 2014 Friends United Meeting Sylvia Graves Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Graves, Sylvia (2014) "Friends United Meeting," Quaker Religious Thought: Vol. 123 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/qrt/vol123/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quaker Religious Thought by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FRIENDS UNITED MEETING SYLVIA GRAVES THE IDENTITY OF FUM Approved at the June 2006 meeting of the Friends United Meeting General Board was a process to develop a Strategic Plan that would guide us in the next five years’ work. The Board had been struggling, they said, to give a clear direction to the staff. The expenses of the organization had far exceeded the income for several years and the endowment was dwindling because it was being used to subsidize the General Fund budget. And, the tension brought about by the FUM hiring policy which has been a strong indicator that we didn’t agree on our core theology had contributed to the burn out of several key leaders in recent years. (I know that because they told me.) It was hoped that a Strategic Plan would help bring clarity to the position from which we minister and more efficiency to our work.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Practice EFC Southwest
    0 Faith and Practice EFC Southwest 2011 Edition Reprint May 2016 EFC SOUTHWEST 18639 Yorba Linda Blvd. Yorba Linda, CA 92886 www.efcsouthwest.org 1 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Our Beliefs ........................................................................................... 4 Historical Introduction ........................................................................................... 4 An Affirmation of Faith .......................................................................................... 7 Fervent Convictions ............................................................................................... 7 Counsel on Contemporary Issues ........................................................................ 11 Values ................................................................................................................... 13 Accountability Questions ..................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2 Historical Faith Statements ................................................................. 18 George Fox Letter to Governor of Barbados – 1671............................................ 18 Richmond Declaration of Faith – 1887 ................................................................ 21 Friends Church Southwest Elements Statement – 1994 ..................................... 29 Chapter 3 Regional Organization ........................................................................ 32 Final Authority ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quakers in America
    “I expect to pass through life but once. If therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or any good thing I can do to any fellow being, let me do it now, and not defer or neglect it, as I shall not pass this way again.” - William Penn Quaker Affirmations Quaker History, Part 2: W M Penn, Courtesy Library of Congress, LC-DIG-pga-00455 Quakers in America Quaker Affirmation, Lesson 2 Quaker history in 3 segments: 1. 1647 – 1691: George Fox • Begins with the ministry of George Fox until the time of his death, and encompasses the rise and swift expansion of the Friends movement 2. 1691 – 1827: The Age of Quietism 3. 1827 – present: Fragmentation, Division & Reaffirmation 2 Review: • Fox sought to revive “Primitive Christianity” after a revelation of Christ in 1647 and a vision of “a great people to be gathered” in 1652. • Many people in England were resentful of the government-led church and longed for a more meaningful spiritual path. • A group of Friends dubbed “The Valiant Sixty” traveled the country and the world to preach Fox’s message. • Around 60,000 people had joined the Society of Friends by 1680. • Friends in mid-1600s were often persecuted for their George Fox beliefs, and George Fox was often in prison. • George Fox and many other Friends came to America 1647 - 1691 to preach. 3 George Fox, Courtesy Library of Congress, LC=USZ62-5790 Review: What was the essence of Fox’s message? • There is that of God in everyone. • The Inner Light lives within; it discerns between good and evil and unites us.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Unprogrammed Friends in Kansas: 1833-2003
    A HISTORY OF UNPROGRAMMED FRIENDS IN KANSAS: 1833-2003 James R. Lynch From colonial times in America, Quakers have felt a special concern for Native Americans, and concern for Native Americans led the first Friends to move to Kansas. Friends of Baltimore Yearly Meeting had begun a relationship with the Shawnee at Fort Wayne, Indiana in 1804, and in 1815 were asked to establish a presence with the Shawnee living near Wapakaoneta, Ohio. Friends built a grist mill, saw mill, school and dwellings at that location. Then in the 1830s the United States government forced the Shawnee in Ohio to accept a treaty taking their lands and moving them to a new reservation in Northeast Kansas. Their new reservation in Kansas was to be shared with other Shawnee from Cape Girardeau, Missouri, previously moved by government order. In 1832 the Shawnee asked Friends to follow them to their new homes in Kansas. In 1833 three Friends journeyed to Kansas, surveyed the situation and made an offer to the Shawnee to provide buildings and establish a school. Their offer was accepted and in 1835 the Indian Committee of Baltimore, Ohio, and Indiana Yearly Meetings of Friends completed plans for the mission. In 1836 a boarding school, meetinghouse, stables, and other buildings were erected. In the spring of 1837, Moses Pearson and his wife, with Mary H. Stanton and Elias Newby, came out in a covered wagon to take charge. The buildings were furnished and equipped and the farm opened. Fifty acres of ground was broken, crops put in, fences built, and meeting for worship begun on first and fifth days.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Practice (1960) Pacific Yearly Meeting: Faith and Practice (1973) Philadelphia Yearly Meeting: Faith and Practice (Revised 1972)
    FAITH AND PRACTICE THE BOOK OF DISCIPLINE OF THE OHIO VALLEY YEARLY MEETING OF THE RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS June 24, 2019 Revision Committee Edition Ohio Valley Yearly Meeting is in the process of revising its Book of Faith & Practice, formerly known as the Book of Discipline. Revisions and additions that have been updated by the revision committee or proposed for approval by the Yearly Meeting are included in this electronic version. Because the revision process is not complete, there is no printed version of the book that includes the new material. Last Fully Revised in 1978 1 Selected Sections Revised in 2007, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 (see footnotes) Ohio Valley Yearly Meeting received inspiration and adapted language from materials in the Suggested Reading List and from the following Friends Disciplines: Iowa Yearly Meeting of Friends (Conservative) Discipline (1974) London Yearly Meeting Christian Faith and Practice (1960) Pacific Yearly Meeting: Faith and Practice (1973) Philadelphia Yearly Meeting: Faith and Practice (Revised 1972) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................... 5 Civic Responsibilities ................................. 25 Citizenship .............................................. 25 Listening to the Spirit ...................................... 6 Obedience to Law & Civil Disobedience 25 Meeting for Worship ..................................... 6 Treatment of Civic Offenders ................. 25 Preparation for Worship ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Board Meeting Held Over Zoom Video Conference July 11, 2020
    Permanent Board Meeting Held Over Zoom Video Conference July 11, 2020 20-53: Opening Worship Friends opened with a period of worship. 20-54: Role Call The recording clerk called the role: Present: Leslie Manning, Clerk; Hannah Zwirner Forsythe, Recording Clerk; Travis Belcher, Peter Bishop, Martin Zwirner Forsythe, Chris Gant, Ben Guaraldi, Ian Harrington, Rebecca Leuchak, Ed Mair, Christopher McCandless, Jean McCandless, Gina Nortonsmith, Anna Raddochia ,Carole Rein, John Reuthe, Martha Schwope, Sara Smith, Will Taber, Bill Walkauskas, Tom Vargo, Mary Zwirner Ex Officio: Noah Merrill (Secretary); Bob Murray (Finance Clerk); Bruce Neumann (Presiding Clerk); Elizabeth Reuthe (Secretary’s Supervisor); Shearman Taber (Treasurer) Visitors: Clarence Burley, Marian Dalton, Sophie Forsythe, Sarah Gant, Lisa Graustein, Beth Hansen, Janet Hough, LouAnne MacDonald, Frederick Martin, Phebe McCosker, Jane Griswold Radocchia, Jackie Stillwell, Nia Thomas, Morgan Wilson, Honor Woodrow, Kathleen Wooten, Rod Zwirner Regrets: Fritz Weiss (Former Presiding Clerk); Deana Chase, Darcy Drayton, Kim Harvey Garcia, Elizabeth Szatkowski 20-55: Minutes Minutes from the Permanent Board’s June 6th meeting were circulated in the advanced documents for Friends’ comments and questions. Friends approved the June 6th minutes. 20-56: Nominating Committee Report Jackie Stillwell, clerk of Yearly Meeting Nominating Committee (NC), shared a brief update from that committee. Her written report is appended. When the COVID-19 pandemic began NC chose to focus their attention on a smaller number of essential roles and committees in light of the short supply of energy. Members of NC checked in with committees about what they were specifically in need of and responded to those requests. The full slate of nominations to Yearly Meeting committees is appended.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Background on Readings Reflections
    Quakerism 101 Unit C Quaker Universalism January 31, 2010 Reading Samuel D. Caldwell, ªThe Inward Light: How Quakerism Unites Universalism and Christianity.º Dan Seeger, ªThe Place of Universalism in the Society of Friends, or Is Coexistence Possible?º Background on Readings Samuel D. Caldwell, former General Secretary of Philadelphia Yearly Meeting, presented ªThat Blessed Principal ¼ ª as an address to the Quaker Universalist Fellowship in 1988. It is a clear, succinct argument for a Quaker Christian Universalist perspective. Dan Seeger, Executive Secretary of Pendle Hill until 2002, is a writer and spokesperson for a Quaker universalism that recognizes and draws from the spiritual wealth of many religious traditions. This article is one of many he has written on this general theme. Reflections Please reflect on the following questions as you read and once you have read the reading. What do you believe? Write down, in a few sentences, some of the religious beliefs you hold that are important to you. How did you come to these beliefs? What experiences in your life have shaped your religious beliefs? What characteristics does Sam Caldwell list for the light? How does his description fit your experience? How is Friends© concept of the Light universalist? How is it Christian? What is ªpseudo-universalismº? Why does Sam Caldwell see it as threatening to Quakerism? Do you agree? Defend your perspective. How would you react if Milwaukee Meeting declared that it was not a Christian group? Why? How would you respond if Milwaukee Meeting said
    [Show full text]
  • Some Reflections on Quakers and the Evangelical Spirit John Punshon
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Truth's Bright Embrace: Essays and Poems in Honor College of Christian Studies of Arthur O. Roberts 1996 Some Reflections on Quakers and the Evangelical Spirit John Punshon Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/truths_bright Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons Recommended Citation Punshon, John, "Some Reflections on Quakers and the Evangelical Spirit" (1996). Truth's Bright Embrace: Essays and Poems in Honor of Arthur O. Roberts. Paper 6. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/truths_bright/6 This Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Christian Studies at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Truth's Bright Embrace: Essays and Poems in Honor of Arthur O. Roberts by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. Some Reflections on Quakers and the Evangelical Spirit JOHN PUNSHON suppose that Arthur Roberts was the first evangelical Friend I ever met. I On what was probably the third day of my very first visit to the United States, I flew out to Oregon to meet him and visit George Fox College. I had been teaching at Woodbrooke, the English Quaker study center, for a couple of years, and I was beginning to get an inkling that there were many Friends in the world who were not like us. I wanted to get as far away from London Yearly Meeting as I possibly could, and Northwest Yearly Meeting seemed to be the place. Arthur met me at Portland airport, entertained me to fruit pie on the way back to Newberg and seemed more interested in my attitude to the cul­ tivationof filberts than the soundness of my doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Curiae Brief
    No. 12-307 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE BISHOPS OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE STATES OF CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, IOWA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW YORK, VERMONT, AND WASHINGTON AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; THE JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA; MANHATTAN CONFERENCE OF THE METROPOLITAN NEW YORK SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA; THE RABBINICAL ASSEMBLY; THE RECONSTRUCTIONIST RABBINICAL ASSOCIATION; RECONSTRUCTIONIST RABBINICAL COLLEGE; RABBI AKIVA HERZFELD OF SHAAREY TPHILOH; THE UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM; UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION; UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST; THE UNITED SYNAGOGUE OF CONSERVATIVE JUDAISM; AFFIRMATION; COVENANT NETWORK OF PRESBYTERIANS; FRIENDS FOR LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, AND QUEER CONCERNS; METHODIST FEDERATION FOR SOCIAL ACTION; MORE LIGHT PRESBYTERIANS; PRESBYTERIAN WELCOME; RECONCILING MINISTRIES NETWORK; RECONCILINGWORKS: LUTHERANS FOR FULL PARTICIPATION; AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE, INC. ON THE MERITS AND IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR ---------------------------------
    [Show full text]