Potential Markers for Selecting Self-Eliminating Apple Genotypes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Potential Markers for Selecting Self-Eliminating Apple Genotypes plants Article Potential Markers for Selecting Self-Eliminating Apple Genotypes Aurelijus Starkus, Birute Frercks *, Dalia Gelvonauskiene, Ingrida Mazeikiene , Rytis Rugienius, Vidmantas Bendokas and Vidmantas Stanys Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Orchard Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Institute of Horticulture, Babtai, LT-54333 Kaunas, Lithuania; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (D.G.); [email protected] (I.M.); [email protected] (R.R.); [email protected] (V.B.); [email protected] (V.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.:+370-37-555-253 Abstract: The heavy blooming of apple trees results in the inefficient usage of energy and nutritional material, and additional expenditure on fruitlet thinning is required to maintain fruit quality. A possible solution for controlling the fruit load on trees is the development of new cultivars that self-eliminate excess fruitlets, thus controlling yield. The aim of our study was to identify biological differences in apple cultivars in terms of blooming intensity and fruitlet load self-regulation. In total, 19 apple cultivars were studied in the years 2015–2017. The dynamics of fruitlet self-elimination, seed development in fruitlets and fruits, photosynthetic parameters, carbohydrates, and plant hormones were evaluated. We established that apple cultivars self-eliminating a small number of fruitlets need a lower number of well-developed seeds in fruit, and their number of leaves and area per fruit on a bearing branch are larger, compared to cultivars, self-eliminating large numbers of fruitlets. A higher Citation: Starkus, A.; Frercks, B.; carbohydrate amount in the leaves may be related to smaller fruitlet self-elimination. The amount Gelvonauskiene, D.; Mazeikiene, I.; of auxin and a high indole-3-acetic acid/zeatin ratio between leaves of cultivar groups with heavy Rugienius, R.; Bendokas, V.; Stanys, V. blooming were higher than in cultivars with moderate blooming. A lower amount of abscisic acid Potential Markers for Selecting was found in heavy-blooming cultivars during drought stress. All these parameters may be used as Self-Eliminating Apple Genotypes. markers for the selection of different apple genotypes that self-eliminate fruitlets. Plants 2021, 10, 1612. https:// doi.org/10.3390/plants10081612 Keywords: apple; carbohydrates; dynamics of fruitlet self-elimination; leaves; plant hormones; seeds Academic Editors: Gunars¯ Lacis¯ and Hilde Nybom 1. Introduction Received: 10 June 2021 Apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) is one the most important fruit trees in the temperate Accepted: 30 July 2021 Published: 5 August 2021 climate zone. Stable bearing and the production of high-quality fruits are crucial for growers. Only 5–10% of flowers grow to fruits; therefore, heavy blooming results in Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral inefficient usage of energy and nutritional material [1]. To produce a consistent, high- with regard to jurisdictional claims in quality harvest and to eliminate tree biennial bearing in industrial orchards, fruitlet and published maps and institutional affil- fruit thinning is used; however, this process is costly and ineffective in some cases [2,3]. iations. The efficiency of chemical fruit thinning depends on the plant’s physiological condition and the environment [4]. Additionally, the chemicals used for thinning may negatively impact tree growth, fruit bearing, and the populations of pollinators. Apple bearing is determined by many factors: meteorological conditions, agrotechnical methods, and the biological parameters of a tree. One of the desired traits in future apple cultivars is the Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. genetically determined self-regulation of fruit load. The dropping processes of reproductive This article is an open access article organs occur in the region of the somatic body of plant known as the abscission zone (AZ). distributed under the terms and Abscission has been a useful process in evolution; it results in the development and conditions of the Creative Commons spreading of only high-quality fruits and seeds. The transport of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// through the AZ regulates the sensitivity of the AZ to ethylene [5,6]. AZ becomes sensitive creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ to ethylene when the source of IAA is removed, and abscission starts because of the action 4.0/). of cell membrane enzymes [7]. It has been established that carbohydrates are important Plants 2021, 10, 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081612 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/plants Plants 2021, 10, 1612 2 of 16 in fruit drop [8–10]. A lack of carbohydrates increases the production of reactive oxygen species and abscisic acid, thus activating ethylene signaling pathways. As a result, fruit abscission is activated as well. Plants use photosynthesis to produce carbohydrates in leaves, which are used in the control of endogenic and environmental signals. However, the role of leaves in fruitlet drop is unclear. Studies were conducted on the creation of easily handled systems for the advance identification of abscised fruitlets and the planning of technological means for fruitlet load regulation [11]. The authors established that the measurement of fruit growth speed might be used for determining fruitlets that will drop during the June drop [11]. Lee et al. established that frost shock during early fruit development stages results in changes in the expression of abscisic acid synthesis genes and in the activation of AZ movement in the cell cytoplasm [12]. Several studies in model plants identifying genetic and physiological parameters of fruit drop were performed. Possible gene targets for future research and rearrangement using biotechnological methods were proposed [13]. Gene groups responsible for ethylene biosynthesis, auxin carriers, metabolism of carbohydrates, and hydrolytic ferments were established [14]. However, gene expression may be different and specific to various cells and tissues [15]. Knowledge of the physiological, genetic, and genomic aspects related to fruit abscission is sparse. The self-elimination of fruitlets seems to be an important trait, leading to yield stability and lower orchard management costs; therefore, cultivars with this trait are desired by industrial growers. Modern apple breeding programs often include fruitlet self-elimination in breeding schemes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the biological differences in apple cultivars in terms of fruitlet load self-regulation and identify features closely related to self-eliminating fruitlets. 2. Results 2.1. Evaluation of Dynamics of Blossom and Fruitlet Self-Elimination during Vegetation The apple tree load of blossoms and fruitlet self-elimination depend on the cultivar. Fluctuations in blooming are characterized by the variation coefficient, which ranges from 1.9% to 72.7% (Table1). Cultivars with heavy blooming belonging to groups I and II had a similar average blossom number per 1 m of branch during a 3-year period, without significant differences. These cultivars had twice as many blossoms compared to cultivars from groups III and IV, which had a moderate bloom. Cultivar groups I and III showed high self-elimination of fruitlets. However, after the first drop, they had a much higher percentage of remaining fruitlets (18.6–50.8% on average) compared to cultivars in groups II and IV, which showed moderate fruitlet self-elimination (7.7% and 20.1% on average, respectively). The fruitlet number on groups I and III trees decreased more than two-fold until July, whereas the number of fruitlets decreased by one-third on trees in groups II and IV. Therefore, the dynamics of fruitlet self-elimination in cultivar groups were different. Plants 2021, 10, 1612 3 of 16 Table 1. Dynamics of the number of fruitlets during apple tree vegetation in 2015–2017. 3-Year Average Number of Drop I Drop II Coefficient of Blossoms per 1 m of Number of Fruitlets per Number of Fruitlets per Cultivar Variation Branch 1 m of Branch (%) 1 m of Branch (%) (%) ± SD 1 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 Orlovim 79.4 ± 18.3 23.1 38.4 21.4 8.5 19.1 10.9 6.2 Ottawa 49.9 ± 12.0 24.0 59.7 33.5 34.9 23.7 19.0 17.1 Sonata 63.7 ± 10.1 15.9 22.8 16.4 18.8 8.1 6.4 5.6 Lord Lemburne 77.3 ± 56.2 72.7 16.0 9.7 5.8 6.0 4.6 3.1 Melrose 52.8 ± 15.4 29.2 25.5 27.0 11.0 6.3 18.6 4.8 Selena 81.3 ± 15.5 19.0 61.8 47.7 28.7 20.6 20.0 12.9 Makresa 61.3 ± 21.8 35.6 28.8 31.4 26.5 9.9 17.7 7.9 Montvilinis 88.2 ± 4.7 5.3 46.8 61.4 19.5 20.0 23.7 12.8 McIntosh 52.7 ± 16.3 30.9 9.8 13.2 2.7 3.4 0.6 2.7 Average of group I 67.4 ± 11.6 17.2 32.3 30.9 18.6 14.5 14.0 8.9 Yellow Arkad 46.4 ± 15.1 32.5 36.9 20.6 16.3 23.3 13.6 11.4 Discovery 88.4 ± 36.3 41.0 10.7 3.2 3.2 8.7 1.9 2.3 Albrechtapfel 96.2 ± 35.3 36.7 30.8 5.1 3.3 20.5 3.8 2.2 Osvald 57.7 ± 1.3 2.3 25.9 9.6 21.3 10.2 7.8 9.9 Voshod 67.8 ± 1.3 1.9 0 0.7 - 0 0.3 0 Average of group II 71.1 ± 14.1 19.9 20.1 7.7 8.9 12.8 5.4 5.1 Port Oxford beauty 44.1 ± 16.6 37.6 29.3 54.0 43.5 15.1 13.2 14.5 Aldas 29.8 ± 13.1 43.9 40.8 32.1 36.4 16.7 17.2 30.9 Sandov 36.2 ± 4.2 11.5 54.7 66.2 52.9 17.2 24.3 20.0 Average of group III 35.6 ± 5.3 14.8 49.6 50.8 38.8 20.2 18.5 16.3 Wonchester permine 44.5 ± 13.9 31.3 16.2 10.4 7.3 12.3 5.8 5.9 Hume 32.2 ± 5.5 17.0 15.9 5.5 11.1 9.6 1.6 11.1 Average of group IV 38.3 ± 9.3 24.2 16.0 8.4 8.6 10.8 4.1 7.8 1 Standard deviation.
Recommended publications
  • Horticultural Science-A Century of Discovery and Application
    Horticultural science-a century of discovery and application Article Accepted Version Dixon, G. R. (2019) Horticultural science-a century of discovery and application. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 94 (5). pp. 550-572. ISSN 1462-0316 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2019.1599700 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/84938/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2019.1599700 Publisher: Taylor & Francis All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Horticultural science-a century of discovery and application G R Dixon, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Earley Gate, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AR, United Kingdom [email protected] Abstract The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology (JHSB) celebrates, in 2019, a century of continuously publishing peer-review, research-based articles and reviews. Since 1919 scientific discoveries and their application through subsequently evolved industrial technologies have formed the basis for enormous advances and changes in the production of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals. New industries have been founded and expanded as a result of scientific discoveries. Science has brought greater precision, predictability and reliability into horticultural crop production raising the quality and range of products available for consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternate Bearing in the Avocado (Persea Americana Mill.)
    California Avocado Society 1997 Yearbook 81: 117-148 ALTERNATE BEARING IN THE AVOCADO (PERSEA AMERICANA MILL.) Sergio Paz-Vega Master in Plant Sciences, University of California at Riverside. This paper is a slightly modified version of the author's approved thesis. INTRODUCTION An alternate or biennial bearing tree is one that does not bear a regular crop year after year. Instead, heavy yields are followed by extremely low ones and vice versa. Early literature emphasizes alternate or biennial bearing of deciduous fruit trees. However, this phenomenon is common in widely different families of trees including citrus, apples, mangoes, pistachios, pecans, and avocados52. During a single alternating cycle, the on-year is the year in which trees produce an intense bloom in the spring and a heavy crop load is set and carried through maturity, eventually resulting in a high yield at the time of harvest (on-harvest). An off-year is the year in which the trees produce a light bloom, resulting in a light crop load and a low yield at the time of harvest (off-harvest). Alternate or biennial bearing is not always an every other year cycle. An "extremely" on-year can be followed by one or more off-years and vice versa. Alternate bearing in avocado is a phenomenon that growers and the industry would like to eliminate because of its economic impact. In on-years, the large number of fruit produced per tree results in smaller individual fruit that are less valuable. In off-years, the fruit are of better size and quality, but the very low yields result in low net dollar return to the grower.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternate Bearing in Fruits Trees: a Review
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 1218-1235 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 10 Number 01 (2021) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Review Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.146 Alternate Bearing in Fruits Trees: A Review Ashok Kumar1*, B. D. Bhuj2 and C. P. Singh2 1Department of Horticulture, SGT University, Gurgram, Haryana, [NCR Delhi], India 2College of Agriculture, G.B.P.U.A &T- Pant Nagar, U.P., India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Alternate Bearing is an alternating pattern of large and small crops occurring in many fruit species that is internally regulated by the plant. Alternate bearing in mango appeared to be related to complex relationships between vegetative and reproductive growths and it is varied according to the cultivar. Flowering is the main event that set the stage for mango K eyw or ds production each year. For the attaining the fruit flower initiation is very important and it is very complex phenomena in mango. Flowering is the main event that set the stage for Mango (Mangifera indica L., Fruit mango production each year. For the attaining the fruit flower initiation is very important production, Cultivar and it is very complex phenomena in mango. In mango trees flowering is make them evaluation, especially challenging for physiologists, breeders, and growers. North, east and central Breeding , Irrigation Indian commercial cultivars showed the biennial bearing is very serious problem, while most of the south Indian varieties bear regularly. Therefore, different control measures for Article Info the biennial bearing are application of different chemicals, smudging, pruning etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of New Fruit and Nut Varieties: Brooks and Olmo List 36
    Register of New Fruit and Nut Varieties Brooks and Olmo List 36 Edited by James N. Cummins Department of Horticultural Sciences, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva. NY 14456 ALMOND approximately with Ayles; high density of medium-sized blossoms on spurs. Blossoms have low sensitivity to frost. Tree: medium size and Dale E. Kester spreading, somewhat compact. Department of Pomology, University of California, Davis Hashem II.— Discovered in 1976 by Hashem Naroghi as a limb sport in a commercial almond orchard near DeNair, Calif. Plant patent Aldrich.— Discovered in 1973 by Everett and Randall Aldrich as 4845, 11 May 1982; introd. in 1980. Nut: softshell. Kernel: large, long, a chance seedling adjacent to a commercial orchard near Hughson, flat, similar to Nonpareil; few doubles. Blooms with Nonpareil but Calif. Plant patent 5320,6 Nov. 1984; assigned to Maryanne, Clarence, extends later. Ripens just after Nonpareil. Tree: slightly smaller than and Randall Aldrich. Introd. in 1984. Nut: soft to paper shell; well Nonpareil; upright; productive. Bears in clusters. sealed. Kernel: ovate; width : length ratio = 0.55; slightly plump; Kochha.— A high-yielding seedling from the cross Greek × Non- medium to small size; somewhat wrinkled; few doubles; resembles pareil made by P. Spiegel-Roy and J. Kochba in 1967 at Volcani Thompson. Matures 2 weeks after Nonpareil. Easy to harvest and to Center, Bet Dagan, Israel. Introd. in 1985. Nut: semi-hard; completely hull. Tree: large; medium-upright. Blooms with Nonpareil; cross- sealed with retention of outer cork; shelling percentage » 51; kernel pollinates with Nonpareil, Carmel, Fritz, Monterey, and Price.
    [Show full text]
  • Technologies for Forecasting Tree Fruit Load and Harvest Timing—From Ground, Sky and Time
    agronomy Review Technologies for Forecasting Tree Fruit Load and Harvest Timing—From Ground, Sky and Time Nicholas Todd Anderson 1,* , Kerry Brian Walsh 1 and Dvoralai Wulfsohn 2 1 Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Australia; [email protected] 2 Geco Enterprises Ltd., San Vicente de Tagua, Tagua 2970000, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The management and marketing of fruit requires data on expected numbers, size, quality and timing. Current practice estimates orchard fruit load based on the qualitative assessment of fruit number per tree and historical orchard yield, or manually counting a subsample of trees. This review considers technological aids assisting these estimates, in terms of: (i) improving sampling strategies by the number of units to be counted and their selection; (ii) machine vision for the direct measurement of fruit number and size on the canopy; (iii) aerial or satellite imagery for the acquisition of information on tree structural parameters and spectral indices, with the indirect assessment of fruit load; (iv) models extrapolating historical yield data with knowledge of tree management and climate parameters, and (v) technologies relevant to the estimation of harvest timing such as heat units and the proximal sensing of fruit maturity attributes. Machine vision is currently dominating research outputs on fruit load estimation, while the improvement of sampling strategies has potential for a widespread impact. Techniques based on tree parameters and modeling offer scalability, but tree crops are complicated (perennialism). The use of machine vision for flowering estimates, fruit Citation: Anderson, N.T.; Walsh, sizing, external quality evaluation is also considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption of Regular Bearing in Mango Over Biennial Bearing
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(5): 149-154 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 5 (2020) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Review Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.905.016 Adoption of Regular Bearing in Mango over Biennial Bearing J. S. Shivran1*, M. L. Jat2, R. K. Jat3 and Asha Jat4 1Department of Horticulture, GBPUA & T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand- 263145, India 2Department of Horticulture, CCS HAU,Hisar, Haryana, India 3Department of Fruit Science, SDAUJagudan, Mehsana, Gujarat, India 4Department of Horticulture, Agriculture University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT The alternate bearing in mango trees as well as in other fruit species is a main concern for orchard profitability. Alternate bearing in mango appeared to be K e yw or ds related to complex relationships between vegetative and reproductive growths and it is varied according to the cultivar. Flowering is the main event that set the stage Regular bearing, for mango production each year. For the attaining the fruit flower initiation is very mango, pruning, important and it is very complex phenomena in mango. In mango trees flowering flowering is make them especially challenging for physiologists, breeders, and growers. Article Info North, east and central Indian commercial cultivars showed the biennial bearing is very serious problem, while most of the south Indian varieties bear regularly. Accepted: 05 April 2020 Biennial bearing in mango trees cause by the different factors like, C: N ratio, Available Online: hormonal balance, climatological factors etc. Therefore, different control measures 10 May 2020 for the biennial bearing are application of different chemicals, smudging, pruning etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternate Bearing in Fruit Trees1 4
    ALTERNATE BEARING 129 b. Cool Weather 151 c. Low Air Humidity 151 2. Edaphic Stresses 151 3. Other Environmental Stresses 152 B. Endogenous Factors of Alternation 152 1. Inhibition of Flower Initiation by Growing Fruits 152 2. Fruit Set as Conditioned by Pollination 153 3. The Effect of Seeds on Prevention of Fruit Drop 154 Alternate Bearing in Fruit Trees1 4. Contribution of Leaves to Reproductive Growth 155 5. Competition between Vegetative and Reproductive Sinks 156 6. The Effect of Fruit Overload 157 S.P. Monselise and E.E. Goldschmidt VI. Horticultural Control of Alternation 159 Department of Horticulture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, A. Control of Flower Formation 161 Rehovot, Israel B. Thinning Fruits 161 C. Reducing Crop Influence by Early Harvest 161 D. Pruning Techniques 161 I. Introduction 129 VII. Conclusions 162 II. Definition of Alternation 130 VIII. Literature Cited 164 A. Biennial and Other Cycles 130 B. Quantitative Evaluation of Alternation 131 C. Alternation in Whole Areas of Individual Trees and Individual I. INTRODUCTION Branches 132 Problems of alternate (or biennial) bearing in fruit trees have been III. Representative Cases of Alternation 135 A. Apple 136 investigated and reviewed on many occasions in the last decades. Only B. Pistachio Nut 137 review papers with extensive bibliographic lists will be quoted here C. Pecan 139 (Singh 1949; Davis 1957; Singh 1971; Williams and Edgerton 1974; D. Olive 140 Jonkers 1979). Most of these reviews deal mainly with one sort of tree. E. Citrus 141 Alternation is, however, a very widely spread phenomenon, occurring in F. Avocado 144 both deciduous and evergreen trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Mike A. Nagaol and Melvin S. Nishina2 Ldepartment of Horticulture and 2Cooperative Extension Service, Hawaii County College of T
    USE OF POTASSIUM NITRATE ON MANGO FLOWERING Mike A. Nagaol and Melvin S. Nishina2 lDepartment of Horticulture and 2Cooperative Extension Service, Hawaii County College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources University of Hawaii at Manoa The mango (Mangifera indica L.), a member of Elisa and Davenport 1992). It was concluded that the Anarcardiaceae, is a popular fruit of the water stress was not responsible for flower tropics and occupies a position in the tropics induction, but could enhance the response to cool similar to that of apples in temperate regions. temperatures. Similar conclusions have also been Originating in the Indo-Burma region, the mango obtained by workers in Australia (Whiley 1992). has since spread to nearly all tropical areas of the Reliable flowering is necessary to obtain world. On the Indian subcontinent, it has been consistent mango production in the tropics. In under cultivation for at least 4,000 years. Hawaii, the Pacific, and the Caribbean, where land In the tropics, mangos are usually grown at is a limiting factor, mango is a potentially elevations between sea level and 1,200 meters, but important fruit crop if increased production, does best below 610 meters in climates with a reliable bearing, and off-season bearing can be pronounced dry season. In Hawaii mango will achieved. In Hawaii, biennial bearing is common; grow best at elevations from sea level to 457 a heavy crop one year may prevent further fruiting meters (1,500 ft) (Chia et a!. 1988). Mangos grow for two years or longer. In the Hawaiian Islands, best at temperatures between 27 - 24°C and are leeward sections, which are drier during the winter susceptible to frost damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference on Mango in Hawaii
    Proceedings: Conference on Mango in Hawaii March 9-11, 1993 Campus Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa PREFACE The Conference on Mango in Hawaii was sponsored by the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (CTAHR), University of Hawaii at Manoa, with partial support from the Cooperative State Research Service. Although the 1991 farm value for mango sales reported by the Hawaii Agricultural Statistics Service was only $46,000, mango is one of the most widely grown fruit trees in home gardens. Quarantine regulations prevent the export of mango fruit to the U.S. mainland. However, the fact is little known that mangos are being exported from Hawaii to Canada and Europe, and that Mexican mangos are imported to the Honolulu market via California. Because of the mango's popularity and potential, it is regarded as an important component of Hawaii's specialty fruits industry and merits attention for further development. This conference was organized to discuss a wide and comprehensive range of subjects related to mango. The only other meeting of this nature in Hawaii, the First Territorial Mango Forum, was held on Maui on July 1-2, 1955. The speakers were chosen from CTAHR, state and federal agencies, and the industry itself for their specialized knowledge in the various areas revelant to mangos in Hawaii. We were fortunate to have the resources to invite Dr. Tom Davenport from the University of Florida's Tropical Research and Education Center at Homestead. His willingness to share his expertise, especially in the area of mango flowering manipulation, was very helpful. We were also fortunate to have several CTAHR retirees, Dr.
    [Show full text]