CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

(1984) 4 SCC 352 (2012) 5 SCC 661

(2000) 1 SCC 1, DR DALVEER partly overruled and BHANDARI, S.J. criminal liability on account of dishonour of partly affirmed on this MUKHOPADHAYA AND cheque primarily falls on drawer company and extends to its officers only when conditions point DIPAK MISRA, JJ.) incorporated in S. 141 stand satisfied — Explaining import of words “as well as the ANEETA HADA company” occurring in S. 141, held, for Versus maintaining prosecution under S. 141, arraigning of company as accused is imperative GODFATHER TRAVELS Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours (P) Ltd Magistrate has only to see whether there exists sufficient ground for proceeding against accused Birendra K. Singh v. — Hence, High Court erred in directing CJM to State of Bihar, (2010) 7 SCC 578 BEFORE G.S. (2000) 8 SCC 498 : SINGHVI AND A.K. conduct further enquiry and pass fresh order in 2001 SCC (Cri) 17, GANGULY, JJ Shivjee Singh v. terms of S. 202(2) proviso held, overruled Nagendra Tiwary

-accused convicted under Ss. 302, 307 and 333 IPC and sentenced to life (2010) 12 SCC 506 Ranjit Singh v. Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab(BEFORE imprisonment Kartar Singh State of Haryana, DALVEER BHANDARI AND specifically overruled by Bhagirath (1982) 3 SCC 1 A.K. PATNAIK, JJ case, (1985) 2 SCC 580 appellant entitled to benefit of set-off under S. 428

It is not permissible to prescribe period of 1996 (4) SCC 33 2013 (11) SCC 130 limitation beyond while the trial of a criminal prosecution cannot continue. Criminal Procedure Code 1973, Section 320 - The decision in Ram Pujan's case does not advance the contention raised by appellant. In Ram Pujan Bankat the said case Court held that the major offences Vs. Vs. for which accused have been convicted were no State of U.P. State of Maharashtra doubt noncompoundable, the fact of compromise 1973(2) SCC 456 2005(1) SCC 343 can be taken into account in determining the quantum of sentence. So this case was not in accordance with law. So overruled. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 438 and 439 - In K.L. Verma's case, court held that till the bail application is disposed of one way or the other the court may allow the accused to remain on anticipatory bail, to put it differently, K.L. Verma Nirmal Jeet Kaur anticipatory bail may be granted for a duration Vs. Vs. which may extend to the date on which the bail State State of M.P. application is disposed of. Court also held that 1998 SCC (Cri) 1031 2004(7) SCC 558 while passing order on application under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code 1973 it is not neccessary that accused should be in custody. But with respect to this decision does not laid down correct law. Hence case was overruled. overruled in AIR 2010 NOC 1068 Bom P.B. MAJMUDA AND R.G. Criminal P.C. (2 of 1974) S. 200 _Negotiable KETKAR JJ,. Instruments Act 26 of 1881, S. 142 (b) AIR 2009 Bom 75 Dishonour of cheque _ Even if a complaint under and 2002 (2) All MR M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. Sec. 142 is not signed by complainant in spite of 644 versus State of Maharashtra & verification of complainant, it will not be “non- Ors. entia” prosecution will lie on such complaint.

(2003) 11 SCC 534

(BEFORE K.G. Paparambaka BALAKRISHNAN AND Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 464, 218 Rosamma v. State of B.N. SRIKRISHNA, JJ.) and 211(4) — Dying declaration — Medical A.P., (1999) 7 SCC certification as to fitness of state of mind of SOHAN LAL ALIAS 695 declarant, SOHAN SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB 2003) 3 SCC 1 (BEFORE S. RAJENDRA BABU, D.M. DHARMADHIKARI AND G.P. Prisons — M.P. Prisoners' Release on Probation MATHUR, JJ.) State of U.P. v. Sadhu Act, 1954 (16 of 1954) — Ss. 9(4) & 2 — S. 9(4) impliedly permits classification of offenders Saran Shukla, (1994) STATE OF not only on the basis of their antecedents and 2 SCC 445 M.P. AND conduct envisaged under S. 2 but also further on ANOTHE the basis of gravity of offences R Versus BHOLA ALIAS BHAIRON PRASAD RAGHUVANSHI