DOCSLIB.ORG

Jeffrey Lee Atwater Vs. State of Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jeffrey Lee Atwater Vs. State of Florida No.______________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _____________________________________________________________ JEFFREY LEE ATWATER, PETITIONER VS. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT. ____________________________________________________________ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA _____________________________________________________________ PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ________________________________________________________________ JULIE A. MORLEY Counsel of Record JAMES L. DRISCOLL TRACY M. HENRY LAW OFFICE OF THE CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNSEL MIDDLE REGION 12973 N. TELECOM PARKWAY TEMPLE TERRACE, FLORIDA 33637 PHONE NO. (813) 558-1600 FAX NO. (813) 558-1601 Email: [email protected] CAPITAL CASE QUESTIONS PRESENTED When an individual enters a plea of not guilty, the burden of proving every element of the offense is solely on the State. The accused is presumed innocent. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution demands that counsel for the accused hold the State to its burden of proof. The Petitioner, Jeffrey Lee Atwater, exercised these rights when he entered a plea of not guilty. By doing so, he demanded that the State meet its burden. Mr. Atwater’s trial counsel certainly knew of his not guilty plea and the substantial responsibility it placed on counsel. Mr. Atwater never wavered from his initial plea, never conceded guilt to counsel, and never released the State from its burden. Mr. Atwater proceeded to trial with the belief that the State would continue to have the burden of proof and that his plea of not guilty had the authority that the Constitution demanded. Mr. Atwater was mistaken. Without even consulting Mr. Atwater, trial counsel proceeded to override Mr. Atwater’s decision and jettison his right to hold the State to its burden. Even worse, counsel did so in a manner in which Mr. Atwater could not have anticipated counsel’s concession and could not lodge an appropriate objection or otherwise have communicated to the jury that he was not admitting guilt. To do so would have drawn the contempt of the trial court in full view of the jury. He was not required to make such a spectacle to maintain his rights. The Florida Supreme Court ruled that Mr. Atwater’s claim did not rise to the level of a McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018) violation because of the court’s creation of additional requirements beyond this Court’s decision in McCoy. Accordingly, Mr. Atwater presents the following questions: 1. Did Mr. Atwater show a violation of the right to determine the objective of his defense and his right to hold the State to its burden of proof of each element beyond, and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt, as articulated by this Court in McCoy v. Louisiana, when he had explicitly entered a plea of not guilty and maintained his innocence to counsel? 2. Whether the Florida Supreme Court may de facto overrule this Court and create a requirement of a preemptory objection to unknown trial strategy of conceding guilt and/or a contemporaneous objection by an accused individual to his own counsel when silenced by court rules and without foreknowledge that counsel would waive his rights? ii LIST OF PARTIES All Parties are listed in the caption. NOTICE OF RELATED CASES Per Supreme Court Rule 14.1(b)(iii), these are the related cases: Underlying Trial: Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida State of Florida v. Jeffrey L. Atwater, 1989-CF-13299 Judgment Entered: June 25, 1990 Direct Appeal: Florida Supreme Court Atwater v. State, 626 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 1993) Judgment Entered: September 16, 1993 (rehearing denied November 29, 1993) Supreme Court of the United States Atwater v. Florida, 511 U.S. 1046 (1994) Judgment Entered: April 18, 1994 First Postconviction Proceedings: Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida State of Florida v. Jeffrey L. Atwater, 1989-CF-13299 Judgment Entered: January 5, 1999 Florida Supreme Court Atwater v. State, 788 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2001) Judgment Entered: June 7, 2001 United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division Case No. 8:02-cv-1103-T-26MSS Judgment Entered: October 21, 2003 United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Atwater v. Crosby, 451 F.3d 799 (11th Cir. 2006) Judgment Entered: June 12, 2006 iii Supreme Court of the United States Atwater v. McDonough, 549 U.S. 1124 (2007) Judgment Entered: January 8, 2007 Second Postconviction Proceedings: Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida State of Florida v. Jeffrey L. Atwater, 1989-CF-13299 Judgment Entered: April 20, 2004 Florida Supreme Court Atwater v. State, 892 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 2004) Judgment Entered: December 20, 2004 Third Postconviction Proceedings: Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida State of Florida v. Jeffrey L. Atwater, 1989-CF-13299 Judgment Entered: February 5, 2008 Florida Supreme Court Atwater v. State, 6 So. 3d 51 (Fla. 2009) Judgment Entered: February 27, 2009 Supreme Court of the United States Atwater v. Florida, 558 U.S. 846 (2009) Judgment Entered: October 5, 2009 Fourth Postconviction Proceedings: Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida State of Florida v. Jeffrey L. Atwater, 1989-CF-13299 Judgment Entered: July 13, 2012 Florida Supreme Court Atwater v. State, 118 So. 3d 219 (Fla. 2013) Judgment Entered: June 24, 2013 Fifth Postconviction Proceedings: Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida State of Florida v. Jeffrey L. Atwater, 1989-CF-13299 Judgment Entered: April 17, 2017 iv Florida Supreme Court Atwater v. State, 234 So. 3d 550 (Fla. 2018) Judgment Entered: January 23, 2018 Supreme Court of the United States Atwater v. Florida, 139 S. Ct. 182 (2018) Judgment Entered: October 1, 2018 Sixth Postconviction Proceedings (present petition): Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida State of Florida v. Jeffrey L. Atwater, 1989-CF-13299 Judgment Entered: July 25, 2019 (rehearing denied September 4, 2019) Florida Supreme Court Atwater v. State, 300 So. 3d 589 (Fla. 2020) Judgment Entered: August 13, 2020 v TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTIONS PRESENTED ........................................................................................ ii LIST OF PARTIES ....................................................................................................... iii NOTICE OF RELATED CASES .................................................................................. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................... vi INDEX TO THE APPENDICES ................................................................................ viii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................... ix DECISIONS BELOW .................................................................................................... 1 JURISDICTION ............................................................................................................. 1 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED ........................ 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ..................................................................................... 2 1. Trial Proceedings and Evidence ......................................................................... 2 2. First Postconviction Proceedings ........................................................................ 5 3. Sixth Postconviction Proceedings ....................................................................... 5 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION .......................................................... 7 JEFFREY LEE ATWATER’S TRIAL ATTORNEYS VIOLATED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO MAINTAIN HIS INNOCENCE BY IMPERISSIBLY CONCEDING GUILT DURING HIS CAPITAL TRIAL IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF MCCOY V. LOUISIANA ................................................................................................ 7 I. McCoy v. Louisiana precludes defense counsel from conceding guilt for strategic reasons without the defendant’s explicit permission ................................................. 8 II. It is uncontested that Jeffrey Atwater’s trial attorneys conceded his guilt for the first time during guilt phase closing arguments ..................................................... 10 III. Jeffrey Atwater sought to maintain his innocence at trial and any concession of guilt made by his trial attorneys was done without his knowledge and permission ............................................................................................................... 12 vi A. Jeffrey Atwater never wavered from his plea of not guilty and articulated his dissatisfaction with trial counsel’s surprise guilt concession at the first appropriate court proceeding ............................................................................ 12 B. The records on appeal show that Jeffrey Atwater continually maintained his innocence to counsel and counsel had no recollection of discussing a trial strategy of conceding guilt with their client .................................................... 14 IV. Jeffrey Atwater’s attorneys violated his Sixth Amendment right to decide upon the objective of the defense when they conceded his guilt at trial, in direct contravention of his unambiguous expressions of his desire to maintain his innocence and in violation of his constitutionally protected rights as articulated by this Court in McCoy v. Louisiana ..................................................................... 20 V. The McCoy violation in Jeffrey Atwater’s case was a structural error that invalidates all
Load more

Recommended publications
  • George Bush and the End of the Cold War. Christopher Alan Maynard Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2001 From the Shadow of Reagan: George Bush and the End of the Cold War. Christopher Alan Maynard Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Maynard, Christopher Alan, "From the Shadow of Reagan: George Bush and the End of the Cold War." (2001). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 297. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/297 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI fiims the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTITUTING CONSERVATISM: the GOLDWATER/PAUL ANALOG by Eric Edward English B. A. in Communication, Philosophy, and Political Sc
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by D-Scholarship@Pitt CONSTITUTING CONSERVATISM: THE GOLDWATER/PAUL ANALOG by Eric Edward English B. A. in Communication, Philosophy, and Political Science, University of Pittsburgh, 2001 M. A. in Communication, University of Pittsburgh, 2003 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Eric Edward English It was defended on November 13, 2013 and approved by Don Bialostosky, PhD, Professor, English Gordon Mitchell, PhD, Associate Professor, Communication John Poulakos, PhD, Associate Professor, Communication Dissertation Director: John Lyne, PhD, Professor, Communication ii Copyright © by Eric Edward English 2013 iii CONSTITUTING CONSERVATISM: THE GOLDWATER/PAUL ANALOG Eric Edward English, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 Barry Goldwater’s 1960 campaign text The Conscience of a Conservative delivered a message of individual freedom and strictly limited government power in order to unite the fractured American conservative movement around a set of core principles. The coalition Goldwater helped constitute among libertarians, traditionalists, and anticommunists would dominate American politics for several decades. By 2008, however, the cracks in this edifice had become apparent, and the future of the movement was in clear jeopardy. That year, Ron Paul’s campaign text The Revolution: A Manifesto appeared, offering a broad vision of “freedom” strikingly similar to that of Goldwater, but differing in certain key ways. This book was an effort to reconstitute the conservative movement by expelling the hawkish descendants of the anticommunists and depicting the noninterventionist views of pre-Cold War conservatives like Robert Taft as the “true” conservative position.
    [Show full text]
  • What Journalists Need to Know About Super PAC
    What journalists need to know about Super PAC ads his is the first presidential election in which Americans will be inundated with television advertisements aired by Super Political Action Committees. Often negative, these ads frequently mislead voters, provide little or no information, are often inaccurate and reveal the media’s unclean hands when it comes to undermining democracy, observers warn. And it’s about to get worse. The Republican Primary is providing only a preview of what voters and viewers can expect in the presidential race. The involvement of Super PACs in the 2012 Republican primary contest has skyrocketed with a 1,600 percent increase in interest-group sponsored ads aired as compared to 2008, according to a study released by the Wesleyan Media Project, which tracks advertising in federal elections. The ads include: • A mini-documentary attack ad against former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney by a Super PAC supportive of rival Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House of Representatives; • An ad calling into question Gingrich’s relationship with former President Ronald Reagan, as well as another featuring former NBC news anchor Tom Brokaw reporting on Gingrich’s ethical problems in 1997, both sponsored by a Super PAC supportive of Romney that is headed by one of his former campaign managers and bankrolled by wealthy hedge fund managers; • Political satirist Stephen Colbert has even gotten in on the act by creating his own Super PAC, giving it away to business partner (and fellow comedian) Jon Stewart so that he could run in the South Carolina Republican primary, and also so the Super PAC could run an calling Romney a serial jobs killer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vision Thing”: George H.W
    “The Vision Thing”: George H.W. Bush and the Battle For American Conservatism 1988­1992 Paul Wilson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS WITH HONORS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN April 1, 2012 Advised by Professor Maris Vinovskis For my Grandfather, who financed this project (and my education). For my beautiful Bryana, who encouraged me every step of the way. Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter One: The Clash of Legacies.......................................................................................... 14 Chapter Two: The End of the Cold War and the New European Order ................ 42 Chapter Three: 1992 and the Making of Modern American Conservatism....... 70 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................ 108 Bibliography....................................................................................................................................... 114 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to the University of Michigan library system for providing access to the material used in the making of this thesis. Thanks to Professor Maris Vinovskis, who provided invaluable knowledge and mentorship throughout the whole writing process. Much gratitude goes to Dr. Sigrid Cordell, who always found the resources I needed to complete this
    [Show full text]
  • ATWATER, LEE: Files, 1981-1982 – REAGAN LIBRARY COLLECTIONS
    ATWATER, LEE: Files, 1981-1982 – REAGAN LIBRARY COLLECTIONS Parts or all of this collection or series of Presidential records are not currently processed or available for research. Some folders, segments or whole boxes are processed and are currently available for research. This available material is noted in bold. The remainder of the folders listed in these inventories are subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests under the provisions of the Presidential Records Act (PRA) If you are interested in submitting a FOIA request for access to any of the unprocessed records listed in these inventories or have any questions about these collections or series, please contact our archival staff at 1-800-410-8354, outside the US at 1-805-577-4012, or email [email protected]. ATWATER, LEE: Files, 1981-1983 Office of Political Affairs Harvey Leroy “Lee” Atwater (1951-1991) worked in the Reagan White House from 1981 to 1983. In October 1983, Atwater and most of the Political Affairs staff left the White House to serve in President Reagan’s 1984 re-election campaign organization. This collection underwent a preliminary arrangement in 1990. Material within this collection covers Atwater’s work product as a member of the Reagan White House Staff. This collection consists of three series: SERIES I: Subject File; SERIES II: State File; and SERIES III: Personnel. Reagan Library in 1990. The collection covers only Atwater’s time on the Reagan White House staff. OA 2902 SERIES I: SUBJECT. 1981-1982 AA Meetings ACTION ACTION 1982 Agency Contacts - Correspondence Agency Contact – Correspondence 1982 Agency for International Development Agency for International Development 1982 Agriculture, Department of 1982 Agriculture, Department of Agriculture Schedule “C” American Political Foundation American Security Council: Rick Sellers American Security Council 1982 ASCS 1982 March 20, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Barr, William: Files Folder Title: [Women’S Issues] (3) Box: 14
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Barr, William: Files Folder Title: [Women’s Issues] (3) Box: 14 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection: BARR, WILLIAM L.: Files Archivist: mjd Date: 5/7/99 1. memo Michael Uhlmann to Edwin Harper re: Status Report 1/17 /83 on Women's Issues, 6p RESTRICTION CODES Presidential Records Act - (44 U.S.C. 2204{a)] Freedom of Information Act - (5 U.S.C. 552(b)] P-1 National security classified information [(a)(1} of the PRA]. F-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]. P-2 Relating lo appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]. F-2 Release could disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the P-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]. FOIA]. P4 4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information F-3 Release would violate a Federal statue [(b)(3) of the FOIA]. ((a)(4) of the PRA]. F-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information P-5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors. or [(b)(4) of the FOIA].
    [Show full text]
  • © 2020 Media Education Foundation | Mediaed.Org 1 the MAN CARD: WHITE MALE IDENTITY POLITICS from NIXON to TRUMP [TRANSCRIPT] W
    THE MAN CARD: WHITE MALE IDENTITY POLITICS FROM NIXON TO TRUMP [TRANSCRIPT] WOLF BLITZER: Right now, a historic moment. We can now project the winner of the presidential race. CNN projects Donald Trump wins the presidency. JOE SCARBOROUGH: This was an earthquake unlike any earthquake I've really seen since Ronald Reagan in 1980. It just came out of nowhere. DONALD TRUMP: It's been what they call a historic event. NARRATOR: In 2016, Donald Trump pulled off one of the greatest upsets in American political history, defying both polls and pundits. JOHN ROBERTS: So help me, God. DONALD TRUMP: So help me, God. NARRATOR: Two explanations for his shocking victory dominated media coverage. One was economic and class anxiety. JAKE TAPPER: The Clinton campaign could see white working class voters going to Trump in places like Iowa and Ohio. NARRATOR: The other was racial and cultural anxiety. VAN JONES: This was a white-lash against a changing country. BAKARI SELLERS: We try to find these voters who are economic anxiety voters, but that is not what it is, Wolf. What it is is it's cultural anxiety. NARRATOR: While both explanations were legitimate, they only told part of the story. Yes, Trump won the white vote by a large margin. But a closer look inside the numbers revealed that it was white men in particular, who were most responsible for Trump's success. Trump not only won big with college educated and upper class white men. He won with a record setting margin with white working class men as well.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-0166-S [Presidential Daily Files].Pdf
    George Bush Presidential Library 1000 George Bush Drive West College Station, TX 77845 phone: (979) 691-4041 fax: (979) 691-4030 http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu [email protected] Inventory for Systematic Request 2009-0166-S Records on the Presidential Daily Files January 20, 1989–January 19, 1992 Extent 1390 folders Access Collection is open to all researchers. Access to Bush Presidential Records, Bush Vice Presidential Records, and Quayle Vice Presidential Records is governed by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)(5 USC 552 as amended) and the Presidential Records Act (PRA)(44 USC 22) and therefore records may be restricted in whole or in part in accordance with legal exemptions. Access to Bush Personal (Donated) Records is governed by Mr. Bush's deed of gift. Personal records restricted under the terms of the deed are so marked in the files. Copyright Documents in this collection that were prepared by officials of the United States government as part of their official duties are in the public domain. Researchers are advised to consult the copyright law of the United States (Title 17, USC) which governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Provenance Official records of George Bush's presidency and vice presidency are housed at the George Bush Presidential Library and administered by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) under the provisions of the Presidential Records Act (PRA). Processed By Staff Archivists, January 2010. Previously restricted materials are added as they are released. Related Collections Due to the overall scope of the type of documents located in the Daily Files, related material may be found in almost all other files found within the Bush Collection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last White Election?
    mike davis THE LAST WHITE ELECTION? ast september, while Bill Clinton was delighting the 2012 Democratic Convention in Charlotte with his folksy jibe at Mitt Romney for wanting to ‘double up on the trickle down’, a fanatical adherent of Ludwig von Mises, wearing a villainous Lblack cowboy hat and accompanied by a gun-toting bodyguard, captured the national headquarters of the Tea Party movement in Washington, dc. The Jack Palance double in the Stetson was Dick Armey. As House Majority Leader in 1997 he had participated in a botched plot, instigated by Republican Whip Tom DeLay and an obscure Ohio Congressman named John Boehner, to topple House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Now Armey was attempting to wrest total control of FreedomWorks, the organization most responsible for repackaging rank-and-file Republican rage as the ‘Tea Party rebellion’ as well as training and coordinating its activists.1 Tea Party Patriots—a national network with several hundred affiliates—is one of its direct offshoots. As FreedomWorks’ chairperson, Armey symbolized an ideological continuity between the Republican con- gressional landslides of 1994 and 2010, the old ‘Contract with America’ and the new ‘Contract from America’. No one was better credentialed to inflict mortal damage on the myth of conservative solidarity. Only in December did the lurid details of the coup leak to the press. According to the Washington Post, ‘the gun-wielding assistant escorted FreedomWorks’ top two employees off the premises, while Armey sus- pended several others who broke down in sobs at the news.’2 The chief target was Matt Kibbe, the organization’s president and co-author with Armey of the best-selling Give Us Liberty: A Tea Party Manifesto.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructed: the Populist Revolt As the Cornerstone of Political Development in the American South
    RECONSTRUCTED: THE POPULIST REVOLT AS THE CORNERSTONE OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AMERICAN SOUTH By KEITH E. LEE, JR. A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 ⃝c 2017 Keith E. Lee, Jr. To Ashley ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would not be possible without the support of my wife and children. Ashley did not fully comprehend what she was getting herself into when I decided to pursue a Ph.D., but she has been supportive throughout the process, particularly this last push to finish which included us moving to a different state and me taking on a full time teaching job with all the pressures of finishing a dissertation. Similarly, though they are not fully aware, my kids sacrificed a lot of time with dad so that he could research and write. I am also deeply indebted to the love and support given by my chair, Professor Larry Dodd. I read dozens of horror stories prior to applying to graduate school about students having a disengaged chair, but Larry was just the opposite. I could not have asked for better support, both intellectually and emotionally, than I received from Larry. His wisdom and guidance kept me focused on the task of writing and he pushed me further than I thought I could possibly go. James LaPlant, once my undergraduate mentor, has become a great friend over the last several years. His constant love, encouragement, and belief in me caused me to believe in myself, which was important as I faced a lot of self doubt throughout graduate school { especially during the dissertation phase.
    [Show full text]
  • This ~ Mie Filled IL
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WA5NUNCTOw~ OC. 3W This ~ MiE FILlED IL.. 0 Pd) 0 2, r 537033 YEN PIDUAL SLICYZON CONNISSIOM ~fl 3 Street, N.W. Washingtoa, D.C. 20463 The Eddie Nab. Company C~f9 Suite 200 900 Second Street, S.W. * ~ Washington, D.C. 20001 Complainant, o ~(A Al Brown for Congress Committee COMPLAIN! _____________________ 305 W. Broadway, Suite 400 Louisville, I KY 40202, Respondents. 0 013!EICY 01 COLUN3Th 2 55 ~v) JADONNA Y. LEE, being first duly cautioned and sworn, submits this complaint against The Al Brown Committee (TM Respondent 0 Committee") on behalf of the Eddie Mahe Company ("Complainant"), pursuant to 2 U.S.C. §437g(a)(l), and states as follows: 2, (~4 1. I am President of the Eddie Mahe Company, a corporation doing business in the District of Columbia. In that capacity, I am responsible for the company's records, including bills and accounts receivable. 2. The Respondent Committee was a client of the Eddie Nahe Company, and owes the Eddie Mahe Company for services rendered to it in 1990. On Complainant's information and belief, Al Brown ("Brown") guaranteed payment of Respondent Committee's debts to Complainant; Brown disputes the guarantee. The account is in arrears in the amount of $51,654.40, as of November 7, 1991 (the Debt"). This sum includes a fee amount of $37,500.00 for the services rendered an expense amount of $2,298.89, and interest on the unpaid balance (which accrues at the rate of 1.5% each month) in the amount of $11,855.51.
    [Show full text]