Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge Habitat Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge Habitat Management Plan U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge Habitat Management Plan 1 The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and, where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations. CITATION: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2013. Draft Habitat Management Plan : Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge. Commerce City, Colorado: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge. vi., 143 p. i Executive Summary Located approximately ten miles from downtown Denver, the land (15,988 acres) within the acquisition boundary of Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge (RMANWR) has a well-documented history of significant environmental disturbance and contamination. The primary causes of degradation were the manufacture of chemical weapons by the U.S. Army from the World War II through Vietnam eras and the production of pesticides by Shell Oil Company in the 1980’s. Given the extent and type of degradation, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identified the need for these lands to be remediated in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA, also commonly known as Superfund) to ensure standards for human health and the environment are met prior to transferring ownership to the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) for management as a National Wildlife Refuge. Remediation activities mandated under CERCLA will result in restoring approximately 67% (10,739 acres) of RMANWR lands to native short- and mixed-grass prairie. Other habitats that will be present on RMANWR include shrublands, forested lands, riparian areas, and numerous manmade features (irrigation lakes, ditches, homesteads, etc.), many of which are of cultural or historic importance. The Habitat Management Plan (HMP) is a “step-down” plan from the RMANWR Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP) completed in 1996. Guidance for developing an HMP is based on relevant Service laws and policies, including the RMANWR Act of 1992 (PL 102-402), the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act), and the Service policy on Biological Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental Health (BIDEH) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001). The RMANWR Act stipulates eight purposes for establishment of the Refuge, the Improvement Act mandates the environmental health of refuge lands be evaluated and analyzed to “ensure that biological integrity, diversity, and health of the System are maintained for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans”, and BIDEH directs managers to employ management that “restores or mimics natural ecosystem processes or functions to achieve Refuge purposes.” Collectively, these and other documents stipulate that refuge managers should implement the most appropriate management actions to restore degraded systems to the extent possible and prevent further degradation of systems, which will depend on many factors including funding and staffing. Significant restoration of RMANWR habitats has occurred since completion of the CMP and, in addition, a new Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) will be developed beginning in 2013 to replace the CMP. Therefore, although the goals and principles outlined in the CMP are used to the extent possible, many habitat management recommendations have been revised to better reflect current habitat conditions and to incorporate knowledge gained during the past 17 years of RMANWR management. These revised recommendations will also be incorporated in the new CCP. Given the 15-year lifespan of the HMP, the principles of adaptive management will be used to evaluate and modify management strategies following completion of all restoration efforts. The HMP identifies important wildlife resources on RMANWR and the management strategies that will be implemented during the next 15 years to help ensure the appropriate life-cycle needs of these species are met at the appropriate spatial scale. More than 300 species of wildlife have been documented on RMANWR, but many of these species occur in low numbers or are not observed frequently. To identify priority resources of concern, refuge staff compiled a list of species documented as priorities in various plans developed by national, regional, local, state, and private organizations and compared this list to species that currently use, or potential could use RMANWR habitats. Species that exhibited significant overlap were selected as priority resources of concern and the habitat requirements (e.g., food, cover, area requirements) of these species formed the basis for HMP goals, objectives, and management strategies. However, habitat resources are limited given the size and isolated nature of the refuge; therefore, RMANWR staff used published scientific literature and i professional expertise to identify potential conflicts and optimize conditions for these species within the context of BIDEH. Specifically, the goals and objectives of this HMP are designed to accomplish the following during the next 15 years (2013- 2028): • Promote successful long-term establishment and maintenance of seeded restoration sites, as well as existing native prairies and shrublands, to provide habitat for the resources of concern. • Maintain the importance of RMANWR as a priority nesting site for burrowing owls (Athen cunicularia hypugaea) along the Front Range of Colorado. • Preserve a historically representative population of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus; hereafter referred to prairie dogs in the context of RMANWR). • Provide additional nesting opportunities for resources of concern, including relevant grassland-dependent bird species exhibiting population declines. • Maintain a bison (Bison bison) population that contributes to the Department of the Interior’s Bison Conservation Initiative and helps maintain the structure and composition of native and restored prairies necessary to support priority grassland bird species. • Provide habitat in the Educational Zone of the refuge for neo-tropical migratory bird species that are losing suitable stop-over areas to urban development in the Denver-metro area. • Provide long-term quality nesting and roosting habitat for the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). • As the nation’s premier urban wildlife refuge, the RMANWR provides a variety of unique public education opportunities. This includes how one of the most environmentally contaminated sites in the United States can be restored to a native prairie ecosystem. ii Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Management Zones ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Physical or Geographic Setting ................................................................................................................................... 9 Habitat Condition of the Refuge ................................................................................................................................ 11 Chapter 3: Resources of Concern ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Bald eagle .................................................................................................................................................................. 25 Swainson’s hawk ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 Burrowing owl ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 Cassin’s sparrow ........................................................................................................................................................ 30 Lark bunting .............................................................................................................................................................. 32 Grasshopper sparrow ................................................................................................................................................. 34 Black-tailed prairie dog ............................................................................................................................................. 36 American bison .......................................................................................................................................................... 37 Chapter 4: Goal & Objectives ............................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Plan Template
    Chapter 3—Affected Environment © Rich Keen Hiking on the refuge This chapter describes the characteristics and The land ethic simply enlarges the bound- resources of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal National aries of the community to include soils, Wildlife Refuge in the categories listed below and provides the basis for the environmental analysis waters, plants, and animals, or collectively: presented in chapter 4: the land. ■■ Physical Environment This sounds simple: do we not already sing ■■ Biological Environment our love for and obligation to the land of the ■■ Special Management Areas free and the home of the brave? Yes, but just ■■ Visitor Services what and whom do we love? Certainly not ■■ Communications and Outreach the soil, which we are sending helter-skelter ■■ Partnerships ■■ Human History and Cultural Resources downriver. Certainly not the waters, which ■■ Research and Science we assume have no function except to turn ■■ Infrastructure and Operations turbines, float barges, and carry off sewage. ■■ Access and Transportation Certainly not the plants, of which we exter- ■■ Socioeconomic Environment minate whole communities without batting an eye. Certainly not the animals, of which we have already extirpated many of the largest and most beautiful species. A land 3.1 Physical Environment ethic of course cannot prevent the altera- tion, management, and use of these This section describes the physical environment of ‘resources,’ but it does affirm their right to the refuge. Physical characteristics comprise physi- continued existence, and, at least in spots, ography, water resources, air quality, climate, night sky, and soundscapes. their continued existence in a natural state. Aldo Leopold 96 Final EIS—Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge, Colorado Bresser soils make up the most common soil Physiography series on the refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY 2010 ANNUAL REPORT www.rmbo.org MISSION conserving birds and their habitats VISION RMBO staff and board members ventured to Pingree Park high in the Rockies for a strategic planning healthy, native bird populations retreat in October 2010. sustained in healthy, BRIGHTON (MAIN) OFFICE: SCOTTSBLUFF OFFICE: native ecosystems 14500 Lark Bunting Lane 100547 Airport Road P.O. Box 1232 P.O. Box 489 Brighton, CO 80601 Scottsbluff , NE 69363 (303) 659-4348 | Fax (303) 654-0791 (308) 220-0052 | Fax (308) 220-0053 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Cassy Bohnet, Colorado Education Coordinator Andrew Pierson, Coordinating Wildlife Biologist Abby Churchill, AmeriCorps VISTA, Larry Snyder, Nebraska Project Assistant Carol Cochran, Ph.D. Volunteer Coordinator Magdalena Vinson, Nebraska Education Coordinator Vice-Chair Kacie Ehrenberger, Director of Education & Outreach Steven Deitemeyer, CF Kelly Thompson, Accounting Assistant FIELD OFFICES Jim Pauley, Chief Financial Offi cer Jason Beason, Special Monitoring Project Coordinator, Charles Hundertmark, M.A., APR, ATMB Nancy Gobris,* Biologist/Banding Coordinator Paonia, Colorado Immediate Past Chair Meredith McBurney,* Biologist/Bird Bander Nancy Drilling, SD Projects Manager, Larry Modesitt, MBA, CQE, CTP *part-time Rapid City, South Dakota Chair Patty Knupp, Private Lands Wildlife Biologist, FORT COLLINS OFFICE Pueblo, Colorado Shawn Nowlan, JD, LLM Alberto Macias-Duarte, Research Ecologist, 230 Cherry Street Hermosillo, Mexico Joe Roller, M.D. Fort Collins, CO 80521 Larry Semo (970) 482-1707 | Fax (970) 472-9031 Noe Marymor, Private Lands Wildlife Biologist, Tammy VerCauteren, Executive Director Greeley, Colorado D. Jean Tate, Ph.D. Jenny Berven, Landowner Liaison Brandon Miller, Private Lands Wildlife Biologist, Steamboat Springs, Colorado Warren Taylor, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Banding Station Open! Learn More About Them
    since 1969 the arbler On June 1st, 2009, we moved to Germany. We really miss the bird banding Unsere Vögel (Our Birds) by Julie Norkoli station, but we continue to learn about birds. The area is teeming with hawks, and there is a wild animal park nearby whose main attraction is a daily hawk My family wasW first show (given in German). In the wooded/farming area where we live, many birds introduced to the can be spotted. When we first arrived, my seven-year-old daughter instantly hobby of birding in recognized the sparrows. Since then some of the most interesting birds I believe the spring of 2009 we have identified are European when we stumbled Robins, European Goldfinch, crested across the Audubon Tit, great Tit, yellowhammer, Center at Chatfield European Magpie, Egyptian Goose, State Park during a Coot, great egret, and white Stork. I morning hike. We am so thankful for our experiences came back a few at the Audubon Center at Chatfield days later to observe and the wonderful introduction they bird banding and gave us to birding. You can find us at thought it was one Photo Credit: Julie Norkoli highhillhomeschool.blogspot.com – of the coolest things we had ever participated in. happy birding! Meredith taught us about different species of birds, Photo Credit: Julie Norkoli their habitats, behaviors, and the foods they ate. On top of that she allowed us to touch and hold the birds! These up-close experiences with the birds brought us a new appreciation of these beautiful creatures and inspired us to Bird Banding Station Open! learn more about them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge: on a Rocky Road to Creating a Community Asset, 47 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1401 (2014)
    UIC Law Review Volume 47 Issue 4 Article 13 Summer 2014 The Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge: On a Rocky Road to Creating a Community Asset, 47 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1401 (2014) Rachel Salcido Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons Recommended Citation Rachel Salcido, The Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge: On a Rocky Road to Creating a Community Asset, 47 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1401 (2014) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol47/iss4/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: ON A ROCKY ROAD TO CREATING A COMMUNITY ASSET RACHAEL E. SALCIDO* ∗ I. Introduction ....................................................................... 13991401 II. History of the RMA Refuge and its Conversion to a Community Asset ........................................................... 14021404 A. Background – History of the Region and the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. ................................................... 14021404 1. The Denver Region. ............................................ 14021404 2. A Nutshell History of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. ............................................................. 14051407
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Report on the Health of Colorado's Forests
    Urban and Community Forests: An Investment in Colorado I 2014 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests Urban and Community Forests: An Investment in Colorado II 2014 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests Acknowledgments Special thanks to the following Colorado State • Lisa Dale, Assistant Director, Parks, Wildlife The following individuals reviewed and/ Forest Service (CSFS) State Office personnel and Lands, Colorado Department of Natural or provided information for the aerial survey for providing leadership and/or content and Resources, Denver, Colo. results presented in this report: photos in the production of this report: • Donna Davis, District Forester, La Junta • Justin Backsen, Aerial Surveyor, USDA • Pete Barry, GIS Technician District, CSFS, La Junta, Colo. Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. • Joseph Duda, Deputy State Forester • Mike Eckhoff, Special Projects Coordinator, • Kelly Burns, Forest Pathologist, USDA • Ryan Lockwood, Public and Media Forest Management Division, CSFS, Fort Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. Relations Coordinator Collins, Colo. • Ron Cousineau, District Forester, Granby • Lisa Mason, Outreach Forester • Kamie Long, Assistant District Forester, District, CSFS, Granby, Colo. • Susan Matthews, Forest Management Grand Junction District, CSFS, Grand • Meg Halford, Assistant District Forester, Division Supervisor Junction, Colo. Franktown District, CSFS, Franktown, Colo. • Kim Mueller, Outreach Division Supervisor • Roy Mask, Assistant Director of Forest • Justin Hof, Forestry Technician, USDA Thanks also to William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Protection, USDA Forest Service, Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. Health Management International, Fort Lakewood, Colo. • Brian Howell, Aerial Survey Program Collins, Colo., for his contributions as an • Lisa Peraino, Plant Health Safeguarding Manager, USDA Forest Service, Lakewood, author and photographer in the development Specialist, USDA Animal and Plant Health Colo.
    [Show full text]
  • David Deharport Collection
    David DeHarport collection This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit September 14, 2017 History Colorado, Stephen H. Hart Library & Research Center 1200 Broadway Denver, Colorado, 80203 303-866-2305 [email protected] David DeHarport collection Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Biographical note...........................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents note............................................................................................................................... 5 Arrangement note...........................................................................................................................................5 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................5 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Controlled Access Headings..........................................................................................................................7 General note...................................................................................................................................................7 Collection Inventory.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Right Track 2004 Annual Review Colorado Lottery a Division of the Colorado Department of Revenue
    We're on the Right Track 2004 Annual Review Colorado Lottery A division of the Colorado Department of Revenue COLORADO LOTTERY Looking n behalf of the Colorado Lottery, a division of the Colorado Department of ORevenue, I am pleased to present the calendar year 2004 annual review. And yes, the Colorado Lottery is "on the right track" in our efforts to maximize revenues, provide new and exciting games, and maintain our commitment to customer service Ahead and efficient operations. Through hard work and dedication, the Lottery was able to set new sales records in to 2005 2004, while at the same time identifying efficiencies that allowed us to return additional dollars to our proceeds recipients. s in 2004 The Lottery celebrated yet another successful year with sales over $408 million, breaking the previous calendar year record of $398 million in 2002. The Scratch product line once again led the way in setting the new sales record. In 2004, the Lottery sold more than The Colorado Lottery ended fiscal year 2004 by setting an The Colorado Lottery will undergo $274 million in Scratch tickets. all-time Scratch sales record of $260.9 million. a major computer conversion in Proceeds recipients received more than $ 104 million during 2005. Changes will include new, In addition, the Colorado Lottery began implementation of an entirely new computer game system and fiscal year 2004. This was the second-highest proceeds state-of-the-art terminals that introduced state-of-the-art Scratch game vending machines. These changes will provide the opportunity for produce Powerball, Lotto and distribution in the Lottery's 22-year history.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Chemicals IV Learning Objectives Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO RMA
    Principles of Environmental Toxicology Learning Objectives • Explore the environmental challenges of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Colorado as it transitions to a National Wildlife Refuge. Environmental Chemicals IV • Study the environmental effects, chemical fate and transport, receptors and remedial controls of the Chem-Dyne site in Hamilton, OH. Principles of Environmental Toxicology • Explore the environmental clean-up and transition Instructor: Gregory Möller, Ph.D. of Midway Island from a Naval Air Station to a sanctuary for over 2,000,000 nesting birds. University of Idaho 2 Principles of Environmental Toxicology Principles of Environmental Toxicology Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO • Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) is located approximately 10 miles NE of downtown Denver, CO. Rocky Mountain • In 1942, at the height of World War Arsenal II, the U.S. Army purchased the 17,000 acres of land on which to manufacture chemical weapons, such as mustard gas, white phosphorus and napalm. PMRMA Encarta PMRMA 3 4 Principles of Environmental Toxicology Principles of Environmental Toxicology RMA RMA • Between December 1942 and the end of the war in • Shell Chemical made pesticides, insecticides and 1945, the Arsenal made 155,000 tons of chlorine, herbicides at the Arsenal until 1982. In the mustard gas and arsenic trioxide, as well as 87,000 meantime, the Army produced nerve agent at the tons of chemical products. site from 1953 to 1957. EPA • Private industry was encouraged to lease facilities at RMA after the war. – Julius Hyman and Company (JHC) began producing pesticides in 1946. – In 1952, Shell Chemical Company acquired JHC and continued to produce agricultural pesticides on-site until 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 11-4-2011 Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Recommended Citation Johnsgard, Paul A., "Rocky Mountain Birds: Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies" (2011). Zea E-Books. 7. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/7 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRDS Rocky Mountain Birds Birds and Birding in the Central and Northern Rockies Paul A. Johnsgard School of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska–Lincoln Zea E-Books Lincoln, Nebraska 2011 Copyright © 2011 Paul A. Johnsgard. ISBN 978-1-60962-016-5 paperback ISBN 978-1-60962-017-2 e-book Set in Zapf Elliptical types. Design and composition by Paul Royster. Zea E-Books are published by the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Libraries. Electronic (pdf) edition available online at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/ Print edition can be ordered from http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/unllib Contents Preface and Acknowledgments vii List of Maps, Tables, and Figures x 1. Habitats, Ecology and Bird Geography in the Rocky Mountains Vegetational Zones and Bird Distributions in the Rocky Mountains 1 Climate, Landforms, and Vegetation 3 Typical Birds of Rocky Mountain Habitats 13 Recent Changes in Rocky Mountain Ecology and Avifauna 20 Where to Search for Specific Rocky Mountain Birds 26 Synopsis of Major Birding Locations in the Rocky Mountains Region U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Teacher's Guide
    A TEACHER’S GUIDE • Field Trips • Workshops • Performances • Assemblies DOWNLOAD THE 2015-2016 DIRECTORY AT SCFD.ORG AND SCCOLLABORATIVE.ORG 20152016 DIRECTORY OF EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FOR TEACHERS AND SCHOOLS Sponsored by the cultural organizations of the Scientific and Cultural Collaborative (SCC) HOW TO USE THE SCC DIRECTORY FOR TEACHERS AND SCHOOLS How to use the Directory: Look under major subject headings and then under grade levels to find appropriate programming. Remember to look under “Adaptable to grade” for additional K-12 programs. 1. Contact the organization directly to schedule a program with possible dates and number of students. 2. Neither the SCFD nor SCC are responsible for errors. Copyright 2015 and 2016. Questions about the Directory (not individual programs or bookings): SCC Coordinator, Charlotte D’Armond Talbert, 303-519-7772, [email protected] Photos on the cover provided by (clockwise from top left) Denver Art Museum (photo by Christina Jackson), WOW! Children’s Museum (photo by Daniel Hirsh/West End Photography) and Colorado Mountain Club (photo by Melanie Leggett). INDEX GRADE LEVEL: SUBJECT: All = Adaptable to Grade M = Middle School LA=Language Arts, Humanities and Foreign Language L = Lower Elementary H = High School Arts=Performing and Visual Arts U = Upper Elementary PD = Professional Development SM=Science, Math and Nature for Adults SS=Social Science, History and World Culture ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION TITLE ................................................................GRADE .....SUBJECT .......PAGE
    [Show full text]
  • Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan
    s Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan water·shed plan (wô ́tər- shēd plăn) n. A watershed plan is a strategy that provides assessment and management information for a geographically defined watershed, including the analyses, actions, participants, and resources related to developing and implementing the plan that will lead to measurable results and an overall improvement in the water quality and watershed conditions. The watershed planning process is iterative, holistic, geographically defined, integrated, and collaborative (USEPA 2005). BARR LAKE AND MILTON RESERVOIR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by Watershed Plan Writing Committee of the Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Association: Steve Lundt, Metro Wastewater Reclamation District Laurie Rink, Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company Blair Corning, South Adams County Water and Sanitation District Mapping and technical editing by: 12303 Airport Way Suite 370 Broomfield, CO 80021 October 2008 DRAFT 2008 Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan October 2008 CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES .....................................................................................................................................ix LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS..............................................................................xi INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CCLOA Directory 2021
    2 0 2 1 Colorado’s Most Comprehensive Campground Guide View Complete Details on CampColorado.com Welcome to Colorado! Turn to CampColorado.com as your first planning resource. We’re delighted to assist as you plan your Colorado camping trips. Camp Colorado All Year Wildfires Table of Contents Go ahead! Take in the spring, autumn and winter festivals, Obey the local-most fire restrictions! That might be the Travel Resources & Essential Information ..................................................... 2 the less crowded trails, and some snowy adventures like campground office. On public land, it’s usually decided by snowshoeing, snowmobiling, cross country skiing, and the county or city. Camp Colorado Campgrounds, RV Parks, & Other Rental Lodging .............. 4 even downhill skiing. Colorado Map ................................................................................................. 6 Wildfires can occur and spread quickly. Be alert! Have an MAP Colorado State Parks, Care for Colorado ...................................................... 8 Many Colorado campgrounds are open all year, with escape plan. Page 6 Federal Campgrounds, National Parks, Monuments and Trails ................... 10 perhaps limited services yet still catering to the needs of those who travel in the off-seasons. Campfires aren’t necessarily a given in Colorado. Dry Other Campgrounds ...................................................................................... 10 conditions and strong winds can lead to burn bans. These Wildfire Awareness, Leave No
    [Show full text]