Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY DIVISION OF BIOLOGY AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES Thesis Laboratory Affiliation Form
Student: Please complete this form and obtain signatures of your mentor, department or division chair, and Ph.D. Program director. This form must be completed within two weeks of thesis lab selection and returned to the DBBS Office at Box 8226.
Student Name: Start Date:
Program:
Thesis Mentor’s Name:
Dept/Division:
Student’s Email Address:
Laboratory Phone: Campus Box #: (Will be displayed in Public Directory) If Applicable… Co-Mentor’s Co-Mentor’s Name Laboratory Phone
Co-Mentor’s Co-Mentor’s
Dept/Division: Campus Box #:
Co-Mentor’s Signature: Date: **Co-Mentor’s Dept/Division Chair Signature: Date: **Signature required only if you are sharing financial responsibility with mentor.
Student’s Signature: Date:
Will the student receive support from funding that is restricted by a confidentiality agreement? No Yes If yes, complete and submit the disclosure statement for graduate students.
Mentor’s Signature: Date: Print Name Signature
*Dept/Division Chair Signature Date: Print Name Signature Program Director’s Signature Date: Print Name Signature
*This signature confirms the understanding that if the mentor is unable to provide full stipend support, it is the responsibility of the mentor’s Department or Division of Internal Medicine or Pediatrics (as appropriate) to do so as long as the student remains in good academic standing. **Co- Mentor sharing financial responsibility with mentor.
Mentor’s Responsibility for Stipend Support will begin January 1st in most cases.
Student: After your thesis proposal has been approved by the Thesis Advisory Committee, the Division provides $600 towards travel expenses (research meeting, conference or career development). Contact your Graduate Student Coordinator for details.
Updated 6/2012 Conflict of Interest Policy for Research Involving Ph.D. Students Approved by DBBS Executive Council, March 11, 2009
Research funding from sources that have intellectual property interests in the research, or in which the PI has personal financial interest, may create a real or perceived conflict of interest, given the dual roles of the principal investigator in obtaining funding for the lab and as a mentor for graduate students. Issues of paramount importance are (i) the ability to publish results in a timely fashion; (ii) the ability to communicate research results openly, especially to members of the thesis committee; and (iii) academic rights to publish and speak freely, especially as related to a graduate student’s thesis and defense.
Statement of policy. The following principles should apply to any situation involving a graduate student supported by funding that is associated with a confidentiality agreement: The limitations and nature of the confidentiality agreement must be fully disclosed to and approved by the student, the thesis committee, and the DBBS Associate Dean for Graduate Affairs; The confidentiality agreement must not place an unreasonable burden or delay in publication or reporting at scientific meetings; The confidentiality agreement must not delay the writing or defense of the thesis;
Examples of inappropriate projects: 1. Research involving chemical compounds whose structure or mechanism of action is proprietary and failure to disclose would preclude peer-reviewed publication.
2. Research involving genes or proteins whose original or modified sequences are proprietary and failure to disclose would preclude peer-reviewed publication.
3. Research involving organisms or cell lines that are proprietary and failure to disclose would preclude peer-reviewed publication.
4. Research in which the thesis advisor has a significant personal or corporate financial interest.
Process for handling potential conflicts of interest involving students If a faculty member receives industry-sponsored research support that entails a confidentiality agreement or has a personal financial interest related to the thesis work, the following process must be followed in order for the graduate student to be supported by this source:
As soon as the proposed arrangement becomes a concrete plan, the faculty member and student involved discuss and sign an appropriately specific disclosure statement that is based on a standard template (see attached).
The signed statement should be submitted to the DBBS Associate Dean for Graduate Education, who will review the material and forward a provisional recommendation to the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research.
If approved by the Vice Chancellor for Research, the student may proceed with this research and receive industry-sponsored support pending final approval by the student’s thesis committee.
Once a thesis committee is established (or at the next scheduled thesis committee meeting if one already exists), copies of the disclosure statement are provided to the committee. The committee meets with the faculty advisor and student initially present and decides whether the constraints imposed by the confidentiality agreement are acceptable.
Updated 6/2012 The thesis committee chair forwards its recommendation to the DBBS Associate Dean for Graduate Education by indicating on the disclosure statement whether or not the thesis committee approves the arrangement.
The DBBS Associate Dean for Graduate Education reviews the material and forwards a final recommendation to the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, where a final decision is made.
Disclosure statement for graduate students Approved by Executive Council, DBBS March, 2009 (Template; to be customized by the P.I. before presenting to the student)
Date:
From: PI To: Graduate Student
This memo is to inform you that I intend to support $X of your salary with funds provided by company Y. In accepting this support, I am obliged to sign a confidentiality agreement that puts constraints on the release of proprietary information that may pertain to your research. Research findings generated in whole or in part by this support must be reviewed by company Y prior to public release by presentation at scientific meetings or submission for publication (abstracts or manuscripts). According to the terms of the grant, the maximum time the results may be held for review is Z days. It is my understanding that this delay will be the only restriction on publication of your research. [OR, if chemical structure or other information remains proprietary, spell out the specifics.] For your protection, this arrangement will be discussed with and must receive approval by your thesis committee, the DBBS Associate Dean for Graduate Education, and the Vice Chancellor for Research or his/her designee.
Signature of PI Date:
Signature of Trainee Date
The thesis committee has reviewed the relevant material and [ ] approves [ ] disapproves of the proposed arrangement.
Signature of thesis committee chair: Date:
The Associate Dean for Graduate Education has reviewed the relevant material and [ ] approves [ ] disapproves of the proposed arrangement.
Signature of Associate Dean : Date:
The Vice Chancellor for Research has reviewed the relevant material and [ ] approves [ ] disapproves of the proposed arrangement.
Signature of Vice Chancellor of Research : Date:
(Signed copy should be returned to the Associate Dean for Graduate Education, DBBS, Campus Box 8226)
Updated 6/2012