Citizen S Involvment Roundtable Commitee

MARTIN METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) CITIZENS’ ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)

Wednesday, February 2, 2011 - 9:00 A.M. Martin County Administration Building County Commission Chambers 2401 SE Monterey Road. Stuart, Florida (772) 221-1498

1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Sheila Kurtz, called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

2. ROLL CALL Members in Attendance: Sheila Kurtz, (left at 10:45 a.m.) Amy Eason Alex Trovato Jody Ianuzzi John Patteson Mark Mathes Julie Preast Trent Steele (arrived at 9:05 a.m.) Albert Zilg

Members Excused: Joseph DeFronzo, Vice-Chair Kevin Trepanier

Staff in Attendance: Beth Beltran, MPO Administrator Claudette Mahan, Associate Planner Michael Malham, Planner II Margaret H. Brassard, Administrative Specialist II

Others in Attendance: Kim Delaney, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Andrew Riddle, FDOT Patrick Glass, FDOT Krysti Brotherton

A quorum was present for this committee.

3. APPROVE AGENDA Jody Ianuzzi moved to approve the Agenda. Seconded by John Patteson. Motion carried unanimously.

4. APPROVE MINUTES:

CAC Minutes Page 1 of 11 February 2, 2011 *November 17, 2010 – Regular CAC Meeting

Jody Ianuzzi made a Motion to approve the minutes. Julie Preast seconded the Motion. The motion carried unanimously.

5. COMMENTS FROM COMMITTEE MEMBERS John Patteson, newly appointed member from District Two, gave a brief introduction of himself and his experience being on other committees.

Jody Ianuzzi mentioned that since work is being done at the corner of Savannah and 24th Streets in Jensen Beach that she would like to suggest having an audible traffic signal installed. It would benefit the blind students at Jensen Beach Elementary, and herself. It would provide added safety and help many as it’s a high traffic area with a Post Office, churches, and a VFW Post.

Ms. Ianuzzi would also like to suggest that audible traffic signals be considered at intersections near Hidden Oaks Middle School, South Fork High School, and Palm City Elementary as those three locations are schools attended by blind students.

Beth Beltran, with the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) clarified that Savannah Road is a County Road, so perhaps this committee could make a recommendation to the MPO Board to ask the County to consider audible cross walks at the intersection that Ms. Ianuzzi is concerned about and have Staff investigate the status and costs of the other areas suggested.

Ms. Ianuzzi stated that as lights are updated that they are supposed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) requirements, and the light at the corner of Savannah and 24th was recently updated.

Mark Mathes made a motion to recommend to the MPO Board to ask the County to consider audible cross walks at the intersection of Savannah and 24th Streets. Ms. Beltran should provide this board with an update on the policies of the County regarding substantial upgrades of lights and the County’s stand on implementing compliance with the ADA regulations. Staff should also advise of costs and funding sources for these upgrades of compliance. This motion was seconded by Jody Ianuzzi. There were no objections to this motion. The motion passed unanimously.

Julie Preast, who has served on this committee since 2004, advised that she was stepping down after this meeting. She stated that she would make herself available for questions regarding the responsibilities involved in this position, to her successor, whomever Commissioner Smith appoints.

6. AGENDA ITEMS A. FEC CORRIDOR-AMTRAK SERVICE UPDATE MEMO: temp11CACa07.01

Ms. Beltran indicated that this update was requested by a member of the committee, and she introduced Kim Delaney, with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning

CAC Minutes Page 2 of 11 February 2, 2011 Counsel. Ms. Delaney provided the committee a power point presentation which is an overview of the current plans for rail service in the area and especially pertaining to Martin County. This presentation covered the high speed rail and commuter rail services as well as their proposed facilities. (See copy of power point slides in file.) Ms. Delaney advised that light rail is the only type of rail not being discussed for this area at this time. Mr. Mathes inquired as to what was the desired station spacing for high speed rail. Ms. Delaney advised that there is not a standard. There are some in areas that are densely populated which have more stations than others. She also clarified that the rail stations will be able to compel private investment. The gravitational pull will be exceptionally strong and will promote growth in ways like universities, hospitals and major employment centers and communities. Once the high speed rail gets underway, it will have a dynamic effect on the local economies. Ms. Ianuzzi asked why Fort Pierce was chosen instead of the Martin area. Ms. Delaney advised that some of the reason was station spacing as it’s more half way between West Palm Beach and the Cocoa/Melbourne areas. There is also a lot of job acceleration happening between Tradition (in Port Saint Lucie) and further north.

John Patteson asked if the track would be compatible with the other trains. Ms. Delaney indicated that the high speed rail would be exclusive to itself because the speed of the train dictates that it cannot come into contact with other trains, autos or other vehicles. Al Zilg stated that high speed rail is “mag lev” and the maintenance is less costly. Mr. Zilg is concerned as to how this will be funded. He stated that Phase One has been completely funded by the Federal Government to which Ms. Delaney interjected that Phase One is 90% funded by the Federal Government. Mr. Zilg continued that Phase Two doesn’t have all the funding, and asked how is this going to be worked out? Ms. Delaney said that the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) hasn’t gotten the full answers to that question either. FDOT plans to wait and learn by reviewing other rail programs from all over the world, and make that determination at a later date. Ms. Delaney will forward some links from FDOT to Ms. Beltran so Ms. Beltran would be able to forward them to Mr. Zilg. That way Mr. Zilg may review the information on which FDOT will base their determination. The Amtrak/FEC corridor project would utilize the Flagler’s rail line. This project will restore passenger service on the Flagler line with eight new stations from Jacksonville to Stuart, and new track will be installed in West Palm Beach which will connect the CSX and FEC corridors so Amtrak can continue south on the CSX line on which it currently runs. The Miami station will be relocated to the Miami Airport for ease in access. The Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) is already under construction on the eastern edge of the airport property, with moving sidewalks which go to and from the airport. There are various other forms of transportation so you will be able to fly into Miami, use the various modes of transportation and end up in Stuart, Florida or any of the other cities on the rail line. Current cost estimates are approximately $250 million, which covers improved conditions in Jacksonville; eight new stations along the corridor including some track sidings, which allows the passenger trains to pull over so the freight trains may pass; the connection in West Palm Beach; and any improvements at the Miami Airport’s MIC. This concept has been around for about 20 years, but was placed on hold due to lack of funding. An inspection train, running 79 miles an hour down the corridor, was successfully used to test the track. The train will stop for

CAC Minutes Page 3 of 11 February 2, 2011 approximately three to four minutes per stop. A series of 34 public workshops were conducted last year to determine the eight station locations. The Stuart location which was chosen after all of the location evaluations, is in between Kiwanis Park and the Courthouse. (See map) Stuart will house a caretaker station, which is smaller (approximately 1,000 square feet) and will only be manned shortly before, during, and after a train. It will host approximately 15 parking spots as this type of rail service normally doesn’t have people leaving their cars for long periods of time. There will be a 1,000 foot platform and canopy which will stretch the length necessary for the longest train, (eight cars). Each entry to the station will have an ADA accessible platform, under cover. Ms. Delaney discussed the various station structures in the other cities and commented on which were reconstructed from existing buildings or new construction.

The density of people along the corridor on the East Coast of Florida makes using the train very feasible. The success and sustainability of the economic regions is strengthened greatly as there are many universities and hospitals also along this corridor. Opportunity to access different areas are multiplied with so many facilities available near the train. The Regional Planning Council (RPC) has received numerous letters and resolutions from businesses supporting the train systems as the system has strong economic and job potential.

An agreement has been signed between Amtrak and FDOT regarding liability and draft legislation is to be adopted in 2011 regarding the passenger rail liability.

Cities are actively looking at ways to utilize the rail to generate revenue as in chartering trains for automobile races, football games, festivals and various key events. The State, FDOT, and Amtrak all have dialog with organizations that the RPC is not party to, in efforts to finance the rail service. The State has placed $118 million in the recommended FDOT Five Year Work Program, which has previously been approved by the CAC. If that funding passes the legislature, it would pay for all the capital costs related to the project, i.e. the stations, track improvements, and a portion of the MIC that will be constructed. FDOT has submitted the paperwork a couple of times, and they believe they have worked out the kinks, so it looks positive. Another Federal funding application will be submitted this summer, as it appears that another grant will be coming available.

At the request of this Board, Ms. Delaney began to advise regarding the Tri-Rail project. Tri-Rail is the only commuter train running in the state, and its ridership is about 15,000 passengers a day, but it is forecasted to accommodate 35,000 passengers a day by 2020. The number of riders fluctuates in relation to the price of gas. It runs on 72 miles of CSX track from Dade to Palm Beach Counties, and has 18 stations. Tri-Rail has anticipated expansion to northern Palm Beach County and beyond for a long time. The Department of Transportation has rolled into a larger scale analysis called the South Florida East Coast Corridor Study (SFECCS) which contains all the considerations of long term transit services on the CSX and FEC corridors together for the densely populated area of the State. This study has been in existence for about five years and is concerned with all the service opportunities which exist between the FEC, CSX and the Tri-Rail corridors. They are studying

CAC Minutes Page 4 of 11 February 2, 2011 how they might connect over time to serve the 5.3 million people that currently reside from Palm Beach to Dade Counties, to the projected seven million people by 2020. Transit will be a major resource to the functioning of the Southeast region of Florida. Martin and St. Lucie Counties have prioritized, for a long time, connecting to this form of transit as it can be a huge economic gain to the Martin area. The Amtrak project allows Martin to make this economic, commuter connection, which they can’t make otherwise. Schedules for Amtrak have been in the works for some time. They could have employees in West Palm Beach at 7:45 AM and be returned to Stuart by 6 or 6:30 P.M. that afternoon. There are connections scheduled to both the seaports and the airports all along the Eastern corridor of Florida.

Ms. Priest questioned the lack of parking. Ms. Delaney stated that the City has considered that situation and they do have a plan for parking. The Kiwanis Park parking was funded by FDOT as a Park and Ride lot and it can house 108 spaces and would be able to handle some growth.

Initially, it’s proposed that two trains a day would run in each direction. (Two north bound, and two south bound.) It would begin in Washington, DC, head south to Jacksonville; the train would be split there, and some (auto train etc.) would continue down the CSX, while an engine would be hitched up to the second half (passenger rail) and continue down the FEC. The time savings would be approximately four hours. There is discussion that a corridor train could be implemented. This train would be operated by the State through an arrangement with Amtrak, and run exclusively within Florida, from Miami to Jacksonville. This allows for better scheduling as delays from the North corridor would not affect this train. More trains have been considered, but not each of the trains would go the entire distance. Some trains would only run in certain areas. Also being considered, is an express train which would go straight from an area to Miami, which would benefit those catching an airplane, while another train would make all the local stops. A funding offset is necessary in order to gain this type of action, and the funding partners have not been evaluated to date.

There will also be connections to different areas using buses but there are no firm locations to date.

The Chairman, Sheila Kurtz, turned the meeting over to the direction of Ms. Priest, as Ms. Kurtz was going to have to be leaving about 10:30 A.M.

B. ANNUAL ELECTION OF OFFICERS MEMO: temp11CACa07.02

Ms. Priest addressed the Board with the election of Officers. Ms. Priest stated that Ms. Kurtz agreed to remain in her position of Chairman and Joseph Defronzo agreed to remain in his position of Vice-Chairman.

Mr. Mathes made a motion to close nominations with Ms. Kurtz and Mr. Defronzo remaining in their current positions. This motion was seconded by

CAC Minutes Page 5 of 11 February 2, 2011 Mr. Zilg. There were no oppositions to the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

Ms. Kurtz left approximately 10:45 A.M.

C. FY2011-2015 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AMENDMENTS MEMO: temp11CACa07.03

Beth Beltran stated that there were three TIP Amendments to be heard today. TIP amendment #1 was pulled. This was concerning the Enhancement Funds being transferred from the Jensen Beach Boulevard Project to the Jensen Beach Causeway Project, as more work needs to be done.

TIP Amendment #2 - State Road 710. A section of that corridor is looking for funding. Ms. Beltran introduced Pat Glass to ask about design funds for the western segment of SR 710. Mr. Glass advised that this is a PD&E Study which was presented to the CAC a few months ago. The plan is to widen the road from two to four lanes, modify the drainage to meet permitting requirements, and install a 12 foot multiuse path. The project needs to qualify for Federal funds and in order to do so, the next phase, design, needs to be partially funded and needs to be in the TIP and the STIP. The eastern five miles of this project is in this coming fiscal year’s Work Program which will be adopted on July 1, 2011. However, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is coming out with new noise requirements which are going into effect in July and if the Location Design Concept Acceptance (LDCA) is not signed prior to the new requirements going into effect, FDOT will have to go back and re-do the noise study in the project which will delay the project. Mr. Glass is requesting the TIP to be completed and approved so that this will be approved in early July without having to redo the project and incur a lot of additional costs. FDOT is working to get the project in the STIP also. The project is all of SR 710 West of Indiantown and runs from Okeechobee County line to Allapattah. This is the five miles that runs from Martin County Power Plant Road to Allapattah, it’s the closest five miles to Indiantown, but not through Indiantown.

A motion was made by Mr. Mathes to amend the TIP to include the PD&E study for the TIP Amendment #2-State Road 710. The motion was seconded by Ms. Ianuzzi. There was no objection to the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

Tip Amendment #3 – SR 76. A presentation was previously given by FDOT to the MPO Board, and FDOT agreed to wait on the PD&E Study until after the 2035 Plan was adopted so the consultant could use the 2035 model, which would have correct traffic volumes. The recommendation also requested FDOT to program design funds not just to the Western portion of the project, from the Interchange to Pratt Whitney, but for the entire length of the project from Pratt Whitney to Monterey Road. This TIP amendment is to program design funds from I-95 to Monterey Road, and the new TIP will have design funds programmed for the Western segment from Pratt Whitney to the Interchange.

CAC Minutes Page 6 of 11 February 2, 2011 A motion was made by Mr. Mathes to amend the TIP to include Amendment #3, SR 76. The motion was seconded by Ms. Kurtz. There being no discussion, the motion passed unanimously.

D. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL GRANT APPLICATION MEMO: temp11CACa07.04

Ms. Beltran explained that it was requested at the last meeting, that a letter be sent to the School Board to submit the Safe Routes to School Grant Applications. The Capital Projects Division of the Engineering Department has been working with the School Board in an effort to get this moving forward. This information about the project and its cost was included in the information which was passed out prior to the meeting. Ms. Krysti Brotherton was introduced to discuss the project in details. Ms. Brotherton advised that the school had to be the entity applying for this grant so she worked closely with them to get it completed. There are four (4) projects that are on this year’s application, and project selection has been in process for the past year. The locations to get the grants are the most needed, lower income/poverty areas such as Salerno and Indiantown, which lack sidewalk connectivity. Ms. Brotherton was advised that the funds were not going to be available until 2016, and that guaranteed funds were only available until 2009, so it may or may not happen. This is the first time that Martin County has applied for this type of funding. Ms. Priest offered that she would like to tie Rio into the Jensen area request for sidewalks. Ms. Preast would like to have a sidewalk on Baker Road, crossing Savannah Road over into Rio and she inquired if the Jensen/Rio areas were considered? Ms. Brotherton stated that they had a rather long list of areas in consideration but Ms. Preast could contact the School District or give her the information and she could check into it. It is a very involved process, and they have to do parent and student surveys, tallies, as well as engineering but they will look into it. Ms. Beltran stated that she is working on getting information from FDOT on the Enhancement Program and that particular project [sidewalks] would qualify for those funds. Ms. Preast added that there is a minimum amount required and some sidewalks do not qualify for Enhancement Funds. She will follow up on this issue.

Mr. Mathes inquired if there is still a sidewalk box fund program through the FDOT? Ms. Beltran answered that if you look in the November tentative Work Program for the past two years, there are box funds, however, they are currently allocated to different projects. Mr. Mathes stated that for years there have been deficits in the school sidewalk projects, and he wondered if there could be improvements made to make the school’s and children’s sidewalks a priority, no matter what source of funding is used. Mr. Mathes added that development should be paying their share as well. Publix should have included a sidewalk in the construction of their facility on Baker Road. That would alleviate the County now having to install one.

Ms. Preast added that another problem with the Enhancement Grants is that the real estate [easement] must be owned in order to use the grant. This has been a huge draw back in previous years. Ms. Preast made a request to the committee, that

CAC Minutes Page 7 of 11 February 2, 2011 whoever makes this motion, to consider including the Felix Williams School as one of the schools which will benefit from this program. Ms. Ianuzzi added a comment directed towards Engineering. When doing the Safe School environments, they should install the ADA requirements of audible signals and accessible crossings for the disabled students at the schools. Ms. Brotherton stated that the grants come through a local agency program process and ADA is one of the required components. Mr. Mathes confirmed that this particular point is important as there are different aspects of signals. It’s not just the textile ramps, the audibility need is also there. Mr. Zilg inquired if there are bicycle paths in this area of concern. Ms. Brotherton indicated that bicycle paths and sidewalks are able to be obtained using this grant, as the primary purpose of the grant is to encourage students to walk or ride their bikes to school. It was expressed that elementary students would be better suited on a sidewalk than on a bicycle lane at the side of a road.

Mr. Mathes made a motion for a recommendation for approval of the MPO Board, to send a letter to the School Board to submit the Safe Routes to School Grant Application, to request sidewalks and audible traffic signals that are needed for the safety of the students going to and coming from schools, such as Baker Road and Felix Williams Schools in Jensen Beach. The motion was seconded by John Patteson. There being no discussion, the matter passed unanimously.

Mr. Mathes asked if there was anything that the CAC Committee could do in order to expedite the needs of areas that are having right-of-way or ownership issues. Staff will work with the engineering department to see what funding options would be available for these areas and come back at the next meeting (April 6, 2011) with information on the needs adjacent to other schools. Mr. Mathes will attend a City of Stuart meeting in an effort to refresh the Commissioners of the activities he does on their behalf and remind them that their responsibility is also to insure that sidewalks are taken care of when they have problems moving forward. Ms. Preast acknowledged appreciation for this effort and advised that one of the sidewalks she is requesting was to be part of the Avonlea City Project and that is in the City’s Community Redevelopment Area (CRA).

E. 2060 FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION PLAN (FTP) MEMO: temp11CACa07.05

Beth Beltran introduced Andrew Riddle from FDOT District 4 Office, to make a presentation on the 2060 Florida Transportation Plan (FTP). This was a work effort that was approved in December, 2010. (See file copy of presentation)

Mr. Riddle provided a presentation on the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP), which serves as a transportation plan for all of Florida, not just FDOT. It establishes the policy framework for allocating State and Federal funds which flow through the Five Year Work Program. State law mandates that the plan be updated every five years. It was guided by a 29 member steering committee and four advisory groups. Mary Martin with the MPOAC represented the 26 MPO’s in the State. The Department conducted extensive outreach and public involvement, including twelve regional

CAC Minutes Page 8 of 11 February 2, 2011 workshops, one of which was held in Stuart, two webinars and a Statewide Summit. Approximately 10,000 people have provided input to this process in 2010. The previous plan was the 2025 Plan which was adopted in 2005. Federal law requires a minimum of a 20 year planning horizon. The current FTP’s focus is on issues and opportunities that may arise over the next 50 years, such as sustainability of the fuel tax and passenger rail. Many of their partners, i.e. MPOs, are beginning to look out over longer time periods. The FTP is beginning to work more with their partners to begin implementation and track progress toward achieving goals and objectives. The FTP is looking to envision many characteristics for Florida. A Statewide, multi- modal center connecting employment centers, urban and rural areas, improve all forms of transportation such as passenger rail and transit systems, a global leader in air and space and new investments which would make travelers safer with less delay and fewer emissions. They are looking to make transportation decisions to enhance and support livable communities, promote responsible and environmental stewardship, as well as providing a safe and secure transportation system for all users, maintain and operate Florida’s Transportation System proactively, and improve connectivity and mobility for people and freight.

Many of the prior FTPs are similar to the current plan yet there are a few differences like a stronger desire to improve transportation choices, better connectivity to global markets, reducing the environmental impact, stronger land use coordination, while maximizing the use of existing transportation infrastructure, just to name a few.

The FTP has identified short term objectives and actions to measure and report progress toward implementation. FDOT will provide a statewide transportation scorecard to report progress and will periodically convene with all partners to review the progress.

Mr. Riddle asked the committee to review the project website www.2060ftp.org/. The full plan is shown there, as are other resources including a database of all comments which have been received on the first draft, which resulted in the final.

Mr. Mathes noted the emphasis of reducing the fragmentation of decision making in the handout which was circulated by Mr. Riddle. It actually reduced the structure of the MPO’s from single unit type Government, i.e. Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River Counties, to one regional Government. FDOT appears to be pushing the MPO’s to merge even more formally than they currently are and potentially going to a single MPO. Beth Beltran stated that the MPOAC sent a strong letter to FDOT stating that the MPO is Federal legislation and that something in the 2060 Plan cannot be changed. Mr. Mathes stated that when the Census comes out in about six months, the Feds will be looking at FDOT for their position as to how to deal with the single unit MPO’s and their position is going to be in an adopted document. It will be difficult for them to step away from that at that point in time. The Governor’s opinion will be weighed in on this too. Ms. Beltran asked Mr. Riddle about a recent email which she had received from him. In this email he mentioned that Martin could be a model for the other MPOs concerning the implementation of the 2060 FTP where individual MPO’s work together on projects (like developing a Regional Long Range Transportation Plan) yet remain separate entities. Mr.

CAC Minutes Page 9 of 11 February 2, 2011 Mathes stated that he is not a fan of regionalism. He feels that if the counties are forced into a regional position that a lot of extra effort must be taken to insure that the local aspects are heard. A regional CAC may not be as effective, maybe you could have a few people from each area to represent their area, but it’s not as effective as doing it from the local level. Mr. Mathes stated that he would like the opportunity to have local input if the opportunity arises. Ms. Beltran indicated that this presentation wasn’t going to be heard by the MPO Board until their April meeting, that way they will have input from the advisory committees. Mr. Riddle stated that the Central Office is asking the District FDOT employees to look through the plan, and review the indicators, and performance measures to create a structure of reporting their endeavors and FDOT will be working with the MPO staff. Mr. Mathes likes the idea of Martin/St. Lucie structure of the MPO being a model for these types of regions that still have local identities.

Mr. Riddle stated that they [FDOT] are still trying to develop the Statewide vision, and that they are not trying to ignore the local interests. Mr. Mathes reiterated that the structure seems to be heading to a regional forum and he wants to make sure that there is room in this language, and still some flexibility in FDOT, to allow for another cycle or two, to see how this partnership is working. The two counties have only been working under this new structure for a couple of years. Let the counties make sure that they are satisfied in the way things are developing first. Ms. Preast mentioned that one of FDOT’s goals is community livability. In order to determine if the livability is being achieved, they need to come to the local level to get the feedback, so it is working in compliance with one of FDOT’s major goals. Alex Trovato stated that FDOT does mention “structure” and that the fragmentation of Government is the hardest thing with which to deal. Mr. Riddle mentioned that FDOT has to work with so many different organizations. There are five MPO’s, two RPCs, all the different transit agencies, and the local Governments, so it’s a lot to handle and to group them all into one vision that is tangible that everyone can strive for, is the goal.

Beth will take the comments from today’s meeting as well as the ones she’ll get from the other advisory committees, and since this group will meet again prior to the MPO Board hearing Mr. Riddle’s presentation. By then she can come up with an organized letter or process of how Martin can be a model for other cities. Working regionally, yet staying individual.

7. COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC None.

8. COMMENTS FROM FDOT None.

9. NOTES Ms. Beltran mentioned that the Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) had some issues with the SR710 segment through Indiantown which is what is addressed in the correspondence included in the agenda package. One letter is from Commissioner Smith to

CAC Minutes Page 10 of 11 February 2, 2011 the District and the second is the response. It appears that FDOT is willing to work with the CRA in the roadway improvements planned.

10. NEXT MEETING  April 6, 2011 at 9:00 A.M.

11. ADJOURN There being no further business, Ms. Priest entertained a Motion for adjournment. A motion was made by Mr. Mathes. Seconded by Mr. Patteson. The meeting was adjourned.

Recorded and Prepared by:

______Margaret H. Brassard, Administrative Specialist II Date

Approved by:

______Sheila Kurtz, CAC Chairman Date

CAC Minutes Page 11 of 11 February 2, 2011