The Postgraduate Office

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Postgraduate Office

POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH DEGREE STUDENTS Doctoral Progression

TO BE COMPLETED BY RI’S PGR DIRECTOR

All students wishing to pursue doctoral level study need to be formally assessed after 10 months’ full-time study (or equivalent for part-time) in order to evaluate their suitability for doctoral study. (See Section 3.6 and Annex B4 of the Code of Practice on Postgraduate Research Degrees) Research Institute recommendations need to be approved by the Research Degrees Committee.

Directors of Postgraduate Research, as chairs of their RI Postgraduate Committees, should complete this form with respect to each student who has been evaluated for suitability for progression with doctoral studies.

1 STUDENT DETAILS Name of student

Student number

Research Institute

Lead Supervisor

Degree for which registered

FT/PT

Start date (initial registration)

2 REVIEW DETAILS Broad field of student’s research project

Date of student review

Was this delayed from the normal time? Yes/No If yes, give reasons in report in section 4 Members of review panel

Date of RI postgraduate committee approving recommended outcome

Annex C4, Doctoral Progression V5, 07/11/11 3 CRITERIA FOR SATISFACTORY PROGRESSION (from Annex B4) Please indicate whether the student has met each criterion for progression (Yes/No/Partially) and give any comments as appropriate. Any issues identified should be explained in the report.

Criteria Y/N/P Comments

Thorough literature review undertaken

Able to understand the context (background and rationale) for the proposed research

Able to demonstrate progress in developing intellectual and cognitive skills for satisfactory completion of a doctoral thesis

Able to clearly identify a research question or topic

Has an appropriate research plan

Appropriate methodologies presented

Successful research training undertaken – has acquired the necessary skills and competencies to carry out the research plan

Successful implementation of preliminary studies

Able to set and keep to realistic deadlines for the production of work

Has the student submitted a Personal Development & Learning Plan .For students who started between 1 August 2005 Give module codes and 1 August 2013: Obtained at least 40 credits of approved research training The Research Institute is satisfied that the student is on course to fulfil the relevant research training requirements for thesis submission as set out in COP section 2.2. Has the project been approved by one of the Yes Append copy of approval letter University’s Ethical Review Panels (or by a or or recognised external committee, such as an NHS- No explain (briefly) here why REC).* approval is not required or explain (briefly) why approval is not yet in place and what plans are in place for obtaining it?

* All research involving human participants, their tissues, or personal information must be approved by a recognised research ethics committee before the research can commence. This includes social science research (e.g. fieldwork-based, interview and questionnaire studies). For more information about how to obtain the appropriate ethical approval for your research please access http://www.keele.ac.uk/researchsupport/researchgovernance/ethics/

Annex C4, Doctoral Progression V5, 07/11/11 4 REPORT

Please present a brief case from the RI’s PGR Committee supporting your recommendation, outlining key points, any areas of concern, and how these will be addressed.

5 RECOMMENDED OUTCOME

The student named above has been evaluated by the Research Institute Postgraduate Committee for progression with doctoral studies in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Practice, and the recommendation of the Postgraduate Committee is as follows (check one):

The student is suitable for doctoral study and may progress

The student is not yet suitable for progression and, following review, has been given a programme of work to complete over a period not exceeding 2 months (FT) 4 months (PT), after which period the RI will confirm the appropriate final outcome

The student is not suitable for doctoral study, but is suitable for masters level study, and should now be required to prepare a thesis for submission for a research masters degree

The student is unlikely successfully to complete a research degree and should be required to withdraw

Signed ……………………………………………………… Date ……………………… Director of Postgraduate Research

Name in capitals ………………………………………………………………………..

Annex C4, Doctoral Progression V5, 07/11/11

Recommended publications