Geologic Map of the Mountain View Quadrangle, Stone County, Arkansas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geologic Map of the Mountain View Quadrangle, Stone County, Arkansas Digital Geologic Quadrangle Map Arkansas Geological Survey Mountain View Quadrangle, Arkansas Bekki White, State Geologist and Director Geologic Map of the Mountain View Quadrangle, DGM-AR-00604 Stone County, Arkansas Richard S. Hutto and Daniel S. Rains 2013 Correlation of Map Units Description of Map Units Stratigraphic Column Alluvial terrace (Quaternary) - Unconsolidated clay, silt, Holocene Qat Qat Qls Quaternary sand and gravel on either the modern floodplain or the Pleistocene modern floodplain and one or more terrace levels. SystemSeries Member Formation Unconformity 1500 Landslide deposits (Quaternary) - A mass of rock and Qls Ùhc Morrowan Pennsylvanian debris that has moved downslope due to gravity. Only the largest landslide deposits are depicted. 1400 Cane Hill Unconformity Hale Morrowan 400 Pennsylvanian Mpi Hale Formation (Pennsylvanian, Morrowan) – Consists 1300 of two members, the Prairie Grove and the Cane Hill. Only Mp the Cane Hill Member is present on this quadrangle. 1200 Chesterian Cane Hill Member consists of very thin to Ù Imo interval Mf hc medium-bedded, and rarely thick-bedded, very fine 1100 grained, silty sandstone with shale interbeds. The Mbv Mississippian sandstone is buff to brown on freshly broken and 1000 weathered surfaces, characteristically ripple- or 300 Mm Meramecian flat-bedded, and typically weathers to flagstone; locally thick-bedded and cross bedded; Other rare features 900 Unconformity include liesegang boxwork, bioturbation, and plant Pitkin Limestone Mb Osagean fossils. The shale is typically not exposed but mostly 800 Chesterian clayey and black to dark-gray with rare liesegang Mississippian boxwork. Unconformable with the underlying Imo Unconformity 700 interval. Up to 220 feet (67 meters) thick. Su Silurian 200 Fayetteville 600 Shale Unconformity Imo interval (Upper Mississippian, Chesterian) – Mpi Typically consists of thin- to thick-bedded sandstone Of Ordovician 500 intervals interbedded with shale. Sandstone is mostly Batesville Sandstone very fine grained, buff to tan on fresh surfaces, and 400 weathers to brown or grayish-brown; displays Moorefield well-developed, abundant stylolitic surfaces, and 100 well-preserved plant fossils including Calamites, 300 Meramecian St. Francois Mountains Lepidodendron, and Stigmaria; contains coal traces; cross bedded sections are common throughout; honeycomb 200 structure is a common development, and liesegang Boone banding and soft-sediment deformation are preserved 100 Osagean Salem Plateau locally. The shale is mostly black on fresh surfaces, but Silurian Silurian locally gray; charcoal-gray to tan on weathered surfaces; Undifferentiated 0 ft 0 m Springfield contains poorly exposed fossiliferous zones with Fernvale Limestone Plateau fragments of brachiopods, ammonoids, nautiloids, Ozark Dome crinoids, gastropods, and rugosans. Locally there are flat MISSOURI ARKANSAS gypsum laminae less than a quarter inch (6 millimeter) Ordovician thick, limestone lenses typically no more than two feet Boston (0.6 meter) thick, and fossiliferous conglomerate lenses Mountains Plateau up to three feet (1 meter) thick containing ferruginous pebble-size concretions. Conformable with the underlying Mountain View limestone shale with sandstone shale Boston Mountains Quadrangle Pitkin Limestone. 180 - 400 feet (55 - 122 meters) thick. Escarpment and chert siltstone Pitkin Limestone (Upper Mississippian, Chesterian) – Modified from Shepard et al., 2011 Mp Mostly thick-bedded, very finely to coarsely crystalline limestone shale with calcareous ripple-bedded bioclastic limestone with lesser intervals of shale sandstone shale sandstone containing thin, slightly calcareous siltstone interbeds. and shale The limestone is usually light- to medium-gray on freshly Introduction broken surfaces and gray after weathering; contains unconformable surface abundant fossil fragments including crinoid stems and Archimedes; locally oolitic and cross bedded. The shale This map depicts the bedrock and surficial geology and siltstone is black when freshly broken and buff on of the Mountain View 7.5-minute quadrangle. In this References weathered surfaces. Well-developed nearly orthogonal area approximately 1400 feet (427 meters) of Late joint-sets produce rectangular to rhombic siltstone float Ordovician through Pennsylvanian (Morrowan) clastic where the shale and siltstone intervals are weathering at and carbonate sedimentary rocks are near the surface. the surface. Conformable with the underlying Fayetteville Glick E. E., 1973, Preliminary Geologic map of the The bedrock is overlain by a veneer of Quaternary-age Shale. 140 – 400 feet (43 – 122 meters) thick. Mountain View quadrangle, Stone County, regolith. Regional geology of the area is controlled by an Arkansas: Arkansas Geological Commission, uplift centered in the St. Francois Mountains of Geologic Worksheet, 1 sheet, 1:24,000. southeast Missouri known as the Ozark Dome. – Progressively younger rocks form a series of imbricate Fayetteville Shale (Upper Mississippian, Chesterian) Ingram, R. L., 1954, Terminology for the Thickness of Mf Primarily composed of shale with interbedded micrite. plateau surfaces from the core of the uplift southward Stratification and Parting Units in Sedimentary The shale is black when freshly broken, dark-gray when into Arkansas. This map straddles the boundary Rocks: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. weathered, and clay-rich. The micrite is black on freshly between two of these surfaces: the Springfield Plateau in 65, pp. 937 – 938. broken surfaces and light-gray after weathering; the northern part of the map, and the higher Boston characteristically petroliferous when freshly broken, thin- McFarland, J. D., 2004, Stratigraphic Summary of Mountains Plateau to the south. The Springfield Plateau to medium-bedded, and grades from being almost absent Arkansas: Arkansas Geological Commission, is capped by Mississippian-age rocks deposited in in the lower portion to almost ubiquitous near the upper Information Circular 36, 38p. nearshore shallow marine and fluvial environments contact; Where locally fossiliferous, brachiopods are a between 365 and 330 million years before present. The Rains, D. S., and Hutto R. S., 2012, Geologic Map of the primary constituent. Concretions are abundant locally Boston Mountains Plateau surface is comprised primarily Sylamore quadrangle, Izard and Stone Counties, including up to 4 inch (10 centimeter), bedded, of Pennsylvanian-age rocks deposited in nearshore fluvial Arkansas: Arkansas Geological Survey, Digital light-orange siltstone concretions and cobble-sized and deltaic environments between 330 and 290 million Geologic Map, DGM-AR-00844, 1 sheet, 1:24,000. septarian concretions. Conformable with the underlying years before present. The recognized boundary between Batesville Sandstone. 120 – 400 feet (37 – 122 meters) Shepard, S. L., Dixon, J. C., and Davis, R. K., 2011, Are the plateaus, called the Boston Mountains Escarpment, thick. Ozark Streams Underfit? Using GIS to Re-Examine forms a persistent and prominent cuesta with a steep Dury’s Theory of Underfit Streams: Physical north face that extends from just south of the town of Geography, v. 32, no. 2, pp. 179 - 194. Mountain View on the west side of the quadrangle, to Batesville Sandstone (Upper Mississippian, Irons Mountain on the eastern margin. Mbv The geology of the Mountain View quadrangle was Chesterian) – Primarily sandstone units with lesser mapped in 1973 by E. E. Glick for the 1:500,000-scale intervals of shale between them. Sandstone is tan to gray Geologic Map of Arkansas. This map builds on the to dark-orange-gray on freshly broken surfaces and previous work but uses a more detailed stratigraphic weathers buff to brown; typically either blocky and non-calcareous or rounded, calcareous and cross-bedded; section and depicts structures in greater detail. The Imo shale contacts and structural features on the map are based bedding thickness is highly variable ranging from very primarily on field observations made from July 2012 - thin to thick. The shale intervals are clay-rich, black on April 2013. Locations of data collection sites were freshly broken surfaces, and tan to buff after weathering. recorded with a Garmin GPSmap 76 global positioning Conformable with the Moorefield Formation. 40 – 120 feet satellite receiver. Bedrock inclined at less than 2o is (12 – 37 meters) thick. shown as horizontal. Cane Hill Moorefield Formation (Upper Mississippian, Mm Mermecian) – Consists primarily of shale, sandstone, and Joint Frequency siltstone. The shale is the largest component and is usually dark-gray to black when freshly broken, buff after weathering, and clay-rich. The sandstone is typically 0 330 silty, very fine grained and thick-bedded, but thin to 30 medium beds are interspersed locally; dark-gray when freshly broken and brown to buff after weathering; 300 60 Locally, it is very limey and fossiliferous with abundant, well-preserved brachiopods. The siltstone is usually similar in color and bedding to the sandstone. Near the unconformable contact with the Boone Formation, limey 270 90 siltstone is common. Thickness ranges from 80 – 140 feet (24 - 43 meters). 240 120 Boone Formation (Lower Mississippian, Osagean) - Mb Typically consists of thick-bedded, finely granular to 210 150 coarsely bioclastic limestone interbedded with chert 180 nodules and anastomosing chert beds. The limestone is usually medium- to dark-gray on fresh surfaces and N = 390 light-gray after weathering; common
Recommended publications
  • Geology of the Coal Hill Hartman, and Clarksville Quadrangles, Johnson County and ,Vicinity, Arkansas
    Geology of the Coal Hill Hartman, and Clarksville Quadrangles, Johnson County and ,Vicinity, Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 536-C Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Geological Commission Geology of the Coal Hill Hartman, and Clarksville Quadrangles, Johnson cnunty and Vicinity, Arkansas By E. A. MEREWETHER and BOYD R. HALEY GEOLOGY OF THE ARKANSAS VALLEY COAL FIELD GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 536-C Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas Geological Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract__________________________________________ _ C1 Stratigraphy-Continued Introduction ______________________________________ _ 1 Pennsylvanian System---continued StratigraphY--------------------------------------- 4 Des Moines Series, Krebs Group-Continued Ordovician System_____________________________ _ 4 McAlester Formation __________________ _ C18 Everton Formation and St. Peter Sandstone un- Savanna Formation ____________________ _ 19 divided_________________________________ _ 4 Quaternary System _____________________________ _ 21 Plattin Limestone and Kimmswick Limestone Terrace deposits ___________________________ _ 21 undivided _______________________________ _ 4 Alluvium _________________________________ _ 21 Fernvale Limestone ________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian Cephalopods of Northern and Eastern Alaska
    Mississippian Cephalopods of Northern and Eastern Alaska By MACKENZIE GORDON, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 283 Descr9tions and illustrations of nautiloids and ammonoids and correlation of the assemblages with European Carbonferous goniatite zones UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OF,FICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.50 (paper cover) CONTENTS Pane Page 1 Stratigraphic and geographic distribution-Continued Introduction - - - - - - .. - - - - ... - - - - - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Brooks Range-Continued Previous work-------------------------------------- 1 Kiruktagiak River basin--Chandler Lake area- - Composition of the cephalopod fauna ------------------ 2 Siksikpuk River basin ------- ---------- ------ Stratigraphic and geographic distribution of the cepha- Anaktuvuk River basin _------------..-..------ lopods------------------------------------------- Nanushuk River basin ...................... - Brooks Range---------------------------------- Echooka River basin --------- ----- - Cape Lisburne region ------- -- --- --------- - - - Eagle-Circle district ---__ _ -___ _- --- --- - - ---- - -- - - Lower Noatak Rlver basin -----------------..- Age and correlation of the cephalopod-bearing beds- ---- Western De Long Mountains_--__----- .------ Mississippian cephalopod-collecting localities in Alaska- -
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Atoka Rocks of Northern Arkansas
    Pre-Atoka Rocks of Northern Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 314-H Pre-Atoka Rocks of Northern Arkansas By SHERWOOD E. FREZON and ERNEST E. CLICK SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 314-H Thickness, lithofacies, and geologic history of potential oil and gas producing rocks of Paleozoic age in northern Arkansas UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U. S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows: Frezon, Sherwood Earl, 1921- Pre-Atoka rocks of northern Arkansas, by Sherwood E. Frezon and Ernest E. Glick. Washington, U. S. Govt. Print. Off., 1959. iii, 171-189 p. maps, diagrs., table. 30 cm. (U. S. Geological Sur­ vey. Professional paper 314-H. Shorter contributions to general geology) Part of illustrative matter fold, col., in pocket. Bibliography: p. 186-187. 1. Geology Arkansas. 2. Rocks, Sedimentary. 3. Geology, Strati- graphic Paleozoic. i. Glick, Ernest Earwood, 1922- joint author, n. Title. (Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 314-H. Series: U. S. Geological Survey. Shorter contribu­ tions to general geology) 551.7209767 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract .__----_ ---_-_._--._---__-_-____ 171 Stratigraphy Continued Page Introduction. ___ ___________________________________ 171 Probable latest Mississippian and early
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Depositional Characterization of the Moorefield
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2019 Stratigraphy and Depositional Characterization of the Moorefield hS ale (Middle-Late Mississippian) in its Type Area, Northeastern Arkansas (Eastern Arkoma Basin) Griffina W rner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, Sedimentology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Stratigraphy and Depositional Characterization of the Moorefield Shale (Middle-Late Mississippian) in its Type Area, Northeastern Arkansas (Eastern Arkoma Basin) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Griffin Warner University of Arkansas Bachelor of Science in Geology, 2017 May 2019 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council Walter L. Manger, Ph.D. Thesis Advisor T.A. “Mac” McGilvery, Ph.D. Committee Member Glenn Sharman, Ph.D. Committee Member Abstract The Moorefield Shale represents the Meramecian Series in the Eastern Arkoma Basin in northern Arkansas. Lying on the margin of the Mississippi Embayment and Reelfoot Rift, sequence stratigraphic interpretations have labelled the Moorefield Shale a lowstand wedge succeeding the Early Mississippian (Osagean) Boone Limestone conformably and overlain conformably by the Hindsville Limestone/Batesville Sandstone. The unit contains a basal brown- black limestone and succeeding brown-black phosphatic shale. The Moorefield Shale was deposited along the broad, stable cratonic platform on the southern flank of Laurasia, before it’s collision with Gondwanaland to form the supercontinent Pangea at the end of the Paleozoic. During this time, the midcontinent region was covered by shallow seas and carbonates covered most of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquifer List
    ARKANSAS NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION 101 East Capitol Avenue, Suite 350; Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 682-1611 Fax: (501) 682-3991 www.anrc.arkansas.gov T T Arkansas Aquifer Codes E This is a list of the identified underground aquifers and their code numbers in the state. E ALLUVIUM 112ALVM EVERTON FORMATION 364EVRN PENTERS CHERT 347PNRS ANNONA CHALK 211ANNN FAYETTEVILLE SHALE 332FTVL PIKE GRAVEL 217PIKE ARKADELPHIA MARL 211AKDP FERNVALE LIMESTONE 361FRVL PITKIN LIMESTONE 331PTKN E E ARKANSAS NOVACULITE 330ARKS GASCONADE DOLOMITE 367GSCK PLATTIN LIMESTONE 364PLTN ATOKA FORMATION 326ATOK GOODLAND LIMESTONE 218GDLD PLEISTOCENE SERIES 112PLSC ATOKAN SERIES 326ATKN GUNTER SANDSTONE 367GNTR PLIOCENE SERIES 121PLCN BATESVILLE SANDSTONE 331BSVL HALE FORMATION 328HALE POLK CREEK SHALE 361PKCK H H BIGFORK CHERT 364BGFK HARTSHORNE SANDSTONE 325HRSR PORTERS CREEK CLAY 125PRCK BLACK ROCK FORMATION 367PKRK HATTON TUFF LENTIL 330HNTF POTOSI DOLOMITE 371POTS BLAKELY SANDSTONE 367BLKL HINDSVILLE LIMESTONE 331HDVL POWELL DOLOMITE 368PWLL BLAYLOCK SANDSTONE 350BLCK HOLLY CREEK FORMATION 218HLCK PRAIRIE GROVE 328PRGV S S BLOYD SHALE 328BLVD HOLOCENE ALLUVIUM 111ALVM PRECAMBRIAN ERATHEM 400PCMB BOGGY SHALE 325BGGY HOLOCENE SERIES 111HLCN PRECAMBRIAN IGNEOUS ROCKS 400IGNS BONNETERRE DOLOMITE 371BNTR HOT SPRINGS SANDSTONE 330HSPG QUATERNARY ALLUVIUM 110ALVM BOONE FORMATION 330BOON JACKFORK SANDSTONE 328JKFK REDFIELD FORMATION 124RDFD BRASSFIELD LIMESTONE 357BFLD JACKSON GROUP 124JCKS ROUBIDOUX FORMATION 367RBDX T T BRENTWOOD LIMESTONE 328 BRND JEFFERSON
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Harrison 1° X2° Quadrangle, Missouri and Arkansas
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic map of the Harrison 1° x2° quadrangle, Missouri and Arkansas by Mark A. Middendorf1, Kenneth C. Thomson2, Charles E. Robertson1, John W. Whitfield1, Ernest E. Glick3, William V. Bush4, Boyd R. Haley3, and John David McFarland HI4 Open-File Report 94-430 Prepared in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey, and the Arkansas Geological Commission This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey 2Southwest Missouri State University 3U.S. Geological Survey, Little Rock, Ark. 4Arkansas Geological Commission 1994 FOLIO NOTE This map is the fifth in a folio of maps of the Harrison 1° x2° quadrangle, Arkansas and Missouri, prepared under the Conterminous United States Mineral Assessment Program. Previously published maps in this folio relate to the geochemistry of the subsurface carbonate rocks (Erickson and others, 1988), the geophysics of the basement terranes (McCafferty and others, 1989), the carbonate depositional lithofacies and mineralization in the Caulfield district (Hayes and others, 1992), and the mineral-resource potential of the quadrangle (Pratt and others, 1993). A multicolor version of this map is being processed for publication in the U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map series. Additional maps showing various other geologic aspects of the Harrison quadrangle will be published as U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Maps bearing the same serial number with different letter suffixes (MF-1994-E, -F, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Geologic Names of North America
    Index to the Geologic Names of North America GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-B Index to the Geologic Names of North America By DRUID WILSON, GRACE C. KEROHER, and BLANCHE E. HANSEN GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 10S6-B Geologic names arranged by age and by area containing type locality. Includes names in Greenland, the West Indies, the Pacific Island possessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Major stratigraphic and time divisions in use by the U.S. Geological Survey._ iv Introduction______________________________________ 407 Acknowledgments. _--__ _______ _________________________________ 410 Bibliography________________________________________________ 410 Symbols___________________________________ 413 Geologic time and time-stratigraphic (time-rock) units________________ 415 Time terms of nongeographic origin_______________________-______ 415 Cenozoic_________________________________________________ 415 Pleistocene (glacial)______________________________________ 415 Cenozoic (marine)_______________________________________ 418 Eastern North America_______________________________ 418 Western North America__-__-_____----------__-----____ 419 Cenozoic (continental)___________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Correlation of the Moorefield Shale (Upper Mississippian) in Its Type Area, Northeastern Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 70 Article 14 2016 Age and Correlation of the Moorefield hS ale (Upper Mississippian) in its Type Area, Northeastern Arkansas O. Dalu University of Arkansas, Fayetteville W. S. Coffey Devon Energy W. L. Manger University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Geology Commons, Paleontology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation Dalu, O.; Coffey, W. S.; and Manger, W. L. (2016) "Age and Correlation of the Moorefield Shale (Upper Mississippian) in its Type Area, Northeastern Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 70 , Article 14. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol70/iss1/14 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 70 [2016], Art. 14 Review Age and Correlation of the Moorefield Shale (Upper Mississippian) in its Type Area, Northeastern Arkansas O. Dalu1, W.S. Coffey2, and W.L. Manger1 1Department of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 2Devon Energy, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Correspondence: [email protected] Running Title: Age and Correlation of the Moorefield Shale (Upper Mississippian), Northeastern Arkansas Abstract biostratigraphically useful fossils, likely extends to at least the middle Chesterian.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Oklahoma Graduate College Geology
    THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE GEOLOGY OF WAGONER COUNTY, OKLAHOMA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY RAYMOND W. GOVETT Norman, Oklahoma 1959 GEOLOGY OF WAGONER COUNTY, OKLAHOMA APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COMMITTEE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his appreciation to the Oklahoma Geological Survey for the assistance given while working on th is p ro je c t. Dr. Carl C. Branson checked the work and served as chairman of the doctoral committee. The following men served on the doctoral committee and offered constructive criticism : Dr. E. A. Frederickson, Dr. George G. Huffman, Dr. Charles J. Mankin and Dr. Clifford A. M erritt. Dr. P. K. Sutherland helped to identify the inverte­ brate fossils. Thanks are due to the many farmers and ranchers in the County who gave permission to enter their land and aided in locating outcrops. The writer wishes to thank his father, Mr. Sam E. Govett, for assistance in preparation of the manuscript. The writer is especially indebted to his wife, Lenora, for help in several phases of this project. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................. i i i LIST OF PLATES ................................................................................... v i i LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................... v i i i LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outcrop-Based Sequence Stratigraphy
    OUTCROP-BASED SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY AND RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION OF AN UPPER MISSISSIPPIAN MIXED CARBONATE- SILICICLASTIC RAMP, MAYES COUNTY, OKLAHOMA By SCOTT ANDREW SHELLEY Bachelor of Science in Geology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 2014 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2016 OUTCROP-BASED SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY AND RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION OF AN UPPER MISSISSIPPIAN MIXED CARBONATE- SILICICLASTIC RAMP, MAYES COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: Dr. G. Michael Grammer Thesis Adviser Dr. James Puckette Dr. Matthew Pranter ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I’d like to start by thanking Dr. Michael Grammer. Not only for his guidance while writing this thesis, but for the lofty expectations that he holds his students to. I have learned (and retained) more useful information in the last two years than I did in four years of undergraduate work, not only because of his great advice and teaching, but because I was terrified to look stupid in front of him (not that that stopped me from doing it anyway). One day he will laugh at my jokes…one day. I’d like to thank my committee member Dr. Jim Puckette. He taught my very first geology course at Oklahoma State, and his personality was all the confirmation I needed to know that I was in the right major and profession. He has been a great teacher and friend, and should be considered reigning Hide-and-Go-Seek champion of Oklahoma State University. I’d also like to thank my committee member Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Lost Names in the Paleozoic Lithostratigraphy of Arkansas Noah Morris University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 Lost Names in the Paleozoic Lithostratigraphy of Arkansas Noah Morris University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation Morris, Noah, "Lost Names in the Paleozoic Lithostratigraphy of Arkansas" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 1913. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1913 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Lost Names in the Paleozoic Lithostratigraphy of Arkansas A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Noah Morris University of Oklahoma Bachelor of Science in Geology, 2010 May 2017 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ________________________________ Dr. Walter L. Manger Thesis Director ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Christopher Liner Dr. Thomas (Mac) McGilvery Committee Member Committee Member Abstract The geology of Arkansas has been studied for nearly 160 years, and our understanding of it is continually evolving. Part of this ever-changing study is the nomenclature of the stratigraphy. From the early reports to today, several lithostratigraphic names have been proposed and abandoned to improve the accuracy and clarity of the understanding of Arkansas’ geology. Over these 160 years of study, 214 names have been proposed for the Paleozoic beds of Arkansas, with nearly 80 of them currently in use today.
    [Show full text]