DOCSLIB.ORG

Wadena County Local Water Resource Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wadena County Local Water Resource Management Plan DRAFT 2016-2026 Wadena County Local Water Resource Management Plan Wadena County 2016-2026 Local Water Management Plan Leaf River July 2015 Prepared by: Wadena County Soil and Water Conservation District and the Wadena County Water Plan Task Force 1 DRAFT 2016-2026 Wadena County Local Water Resource Management Plan CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………...…………6 Plan Purpose ..................................................................................................................................15 Description of Priority Concerns ................................................................................................16 Summary of Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................17 Consistency with Other Plans .....................................................................................................20 ASSESSMENT OF PRIORITY CONCERNS…………………………………………………...21 Priority Concerns Identification .................................................................................................21 Priority Concern – Surface Water ...............................................................................................21 Objective A: Remove the Wadena County impaired waters from the 303(d) list ............................. 21 Objective B: Implement land use practices and best management practices (BMPs) ....................... 26 Objective C: Minimize soil erosion and runoff .................................................................................... 29 Objective D: Protect Wadena County’s important wetland resources ............................................... 30 Objective E: Provide education to increase public awareness of surface water issues ..................... 32 Objective F: Expand data collection and monitoring in Wadena County .......................................... 33 Objective G: Enhance shoreland and lake management ..................................................................... 35 Priority Concern – Groundwater Quality ..................................................................................36 Objective A: Coordinate with the Wadena County Planning and Zoning Department to upgrade failing septic systems ............................................................................................................................. 36 Objective B: Coordinate groundwater monitoring activities with other agencies and individuals 38 Objective C: Seal priority unused or abandoned wells in Wadena County ...................................... 43 Objective D: Assist with implementing wellhead protection (WHP) plans for public water suppliers in Wadena County ................................................................................................................. 44 Objective E: Provide education and technical assistance to producers on implementing best management practices (BMPs) .............................................................................................................. 46 Objective F: Implement feedlot best management practices (BMPs) ................................................. 47 Objective G: Provide high quality information to decision makers, natural resource professionals, and the public ......................................................................................................................................... 49 Objective H: Implement land use practices and best management practices (BMPs) ...................... 50 2 DRAFT 2016-2026 Wadena County Local Water Resource Management Plan Priority Concern – Groundwater Quantity ...............................................................................53 Objective A: Coordinate with other agencies on countywide groundwater monitoring efforts ..... 53 Objective B: Provide high quality information to decision makers, natural resource professionals, and the public ......................................................................................................................................... 55 Objective C: Implement conservation tools and technical assistance for irrigation users ................ 55 Objective D: Maintain adequate groundwater resources for public water suppliers in Wadena County ..................................................................................................................................................... 58 Objective E: Support sustainable development and management of groundwater supplies .......... 60 Priority Concern – Habitat ...........................................................................................................61 Objective A: Provide technical assistance and cost share to increase high quality wildlife habitat 61 Objective B: Provide education opportunities on the management of natural resources ................ 64 Objective C: Protect existing high quality habitat................................................................................ 65 Objective D: Promote riparian and shoreline buffers along all waters in Wadena County ............. 70 Objective E: Provide conservation practices that promote land use decisions compatible with habitat protection ................................................................................................................................... 72 Objective F: Promote the importance of controlling invasive species and protecting endangered species habitat ......................................................................................................................................... 74 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY………………………………………………………….……76 SURFACE WATER ....................................................................................................................76 GROUNDWATER .....................................................................................................................79 HABITAT ...................................................................................................................................83 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY TABLE……………………………………………………..92 APPENDICES A – PRIORITY CONCERNS SCOPING DOCUMENT B – INDIVIDUAL MINOR WATERSHED MAPS 3 DRAFT 2016-2026 Wadena County Local Water Resource Management Plan LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Political Boundaries of Wadena County and Municipalities ...................................... 6 Figure 2. Watershed Boundaries and Water Features in Wadena County ................................ 8 Figure 3. Outstanding Water Resources in Wadena County .....................................................10 Figure 4. Ecoregions of Central Minnesota .................................................................................11 Figure 5. Land Cover in Wadena County ....................................................................................12 Figure 6. Soil Drainage Classes in Wadena County ...................................................................13 Figure 7. Soil Types and Aquifers in Wadena County ...............................................................14 Figure 8. Summary of Goals and Objectives ...............................................................................17 Figure 9. Impaired Waters in Wadena County ...........................................................................23 Figure 10. E. coli and Nutrient Impairments with Animal Units in Wadena County .............25 Figure 11. Disturbed Land in Wadena County ...........................................................................28 Figure 12. Wetland Abundance in Wadena County ...................................................................31 Figure 13. Rain Gardens at the Wadena County Fairgrounds ...................................................32 Figure 14. Water Quality Monitoring Stations in Wadena County ...........................................34 Figure 15. Groundwater Sensitive Minor Watersheds in Wadena County ..............................37 Figure 16. Groundwater Nitrate Values in Wadena County .....................................................40 Figure 17. Aquifer Vulnerability in Wadena County .................................................................42 Figure 18. Photos of Priority Abandoned Wells .........................................................................43 Figure 19. WHP and DWSMA for the City of Wadena ..............................................................45 Figure 20. Guided Basal Stalk Sampling ......................................................................................47 Figure 21. Animal Units by Minor Watershed in Wadena County ...........................................48 Figure 22. Education Opportunities in Wadena County ............................................................49 Figure 23. Private Forest Conversion Risk in Wadena County .................................................52 Figure 24. DNR Observation Wells in Wadena County .............................................................54 Figure 25. Permitted Water Use in 2014 in Wadena County .....................................................57 Figure 26. Drinking Water Managed Areas in Wadena County ...............................................59 Figure 27. Terrestrial Habitat Quality by Minor Watershed in Wadena County ....................63 Figure 28. Youth Education in Wadena County .........................................................................65 Figure 29: Percent Protected Land of Minor Watersheds in Wadena County .........................67 4 DRAFT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ninety-Seventh Day Saint Paul, Minnesota, Wednesday, May 5, 2010
    97TH DAY] WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 2010 11341 STATE OF MINNESOTA EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2010 _____________________ NINETY-SEVENTH DAY SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA, WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 2010 The House of Representatives convened at 12:00 noon and was called to order by Al Juhnke, Speaker pro tempore. Prayer was offered by the Reverend Pat Mahin, Minnetonka, Minnesota. The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. The roll was called and the following members were present: Abeler Demmer Hayden Lanning Nelson Sertich Anderson, B. Dettmer Hilstrom Lenczewski Newton Severson Anderson, P. Dill Hilty Lesch Nornes Shimanski Anderson, S. Dittrich Holberg Liebling Norton Simon Anzelc Doepke Hoppe Lieder Obermueller Slawik Atkins Doty Hornstein Lillie Olin Slocum Beard Downey Hortman Loeffler Otremba Smith Benson Drazkowski Hosch Loon Paymar Solberg Bigham Eastlund Howes Mack Pelowski Sterner Bly Eken Huntley Magnus Peppin Swails Brod Falk Jackson Mahoney Persell Thao Brown Faust Johnson Mariani Peterson Thissen Brynaert Fritz Juhnke Marquart Poppe Tillberry Buesgens Gardner Kahn Masin Reinert Torkelson Bunn Garofalo Kalin McFarlane Rosenthal Urdahl Carlson Gottwalt Kath McNamara Rukavina Wagenius Champion Greiling Kelly Morgan Ruud Ward Clark Gunther Kiffmeyer Morrow Sailer Welti Cornish Hamilton Knuth Mullery Sanders Westrom Davids Hansen Koenen Murdock Scalze Winkler Davnie Hausman Kohls Murphy, E. Scott Zellers Dean Haws Laine Murphy, M. Seifert A quorum was present. Kelliher was excused. Hackbarth was excused until 1:35 p.m. Emmer was excused until 2:05 p.m. The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding day. Lesch moved that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with and that the Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Quality……………………………………………
    BECKER Local Water Management Plan COUNTY January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2026 DRAFT Prepared By: Becker Soil and Water Conservation District This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................... i. ACRONYMS AND TERMS........................................................................................... a. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. Plan Purpose………………………………………………………………………….1 Priority Concerns…………………………………………………………………….2 Roles & Responsibilities……………………………………………………………4 About Becker SWCD………………………………………………………………...5 Programs and Projects……………………………………………………………...6 BACKGROUND AND NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY....................................... General Characteristics…………………………………………………………….7 County Population Trends…………………………………………………………7 Physiography and Relief…………………………………………………………..14 Drainage……………………………………………………………………………....15 Landuse & Landcover………………………………………………….…………..15 Major Watersheds…………………………………………………………………..17 Public & Protected Waters………………………………………………………...21 Impaired Waters………………………………………………………………….….23 Wetland Resources………………………………………………………………....25 Soils of Becker County……………………………………………………….…….28 Mineral Resources…………………………………………………………………..31 Forest Resources……………………………………………………………………31 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE………….………………………....................................... Priority Concern: Surface Water Quality……………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • The Condition of Rivers and Streams in Minnesota, Based on Probabilistic Surveys, 1995-2011 Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp The Condition of Rivers and Streams in Minnesota Based on Probabilistic Surveys, 1995-2011 April 2014 Authors April Lueck Scott Niemela Contributors/acknowledgements Daniel Helwig Glenn Skuta Tony Olson Tom Kincaid The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs John Genet by using the Internet to distribute reports and Joel Chirhart information to wider audience. Visit our Kristofor Parson website for more information. John Sandburg MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- Andrew Petersen consumer recycled content paper North Biological Monitoring Unit manufactured without chlorine or chlorine South Biological Monitoring Unit derivatives. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us . Document number: wq-bsm1-08 Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redeye River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report
    Summary Monitoring and Assessment Redeye River Watershed Why is it The Redeye River watershed covers nearly 900 square miles in the northern part of the Upper Mississippi River Basin in central Minnesota. The watershed includes all important? or parts of Becker, Otter Tail, Todd, and Wadena counties. The Redeye River begins at Wolf Lake and joins the Leaf River, before draining into the Crow Wing River near Staples. The Redeye River provides drinking water for households and industries, habaitat for aquatic life, riparian corridors for wildlife, and recreation opportunities like fishing, swimming, and canoeing. Nearly half the watershed’s land use is agricultural, 30% is forested, 15% is wetlands, and about 4% is developed communities and industries. Key issues Based on intensive watershed monitoring, which began in 2011, results indicate that a handful of streams do not meet water quality standards for beneficial uses such as: • Aquatic life • Drinking water • Fish consumption The main concerns are excess sediment and high bacteria levels. Highlights of report • In 2011, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency began an intensive watershed monitoring effort at about 40 sites throughout the Redeye River watershed. As part of this effort, MPCA staff joined with the Wadena County Soil and Water Conservation District and the Otter Tail County Coalition of Lake Associations. • In 2013, a holistic approach was taken to assess all of the watershed’s surface waters for support, or non support of aquatic life, recreation, and fish consumption. • Of the waters that do not fully support aquatic life or aquatic recreation, the main source of impairments are due to high bacteria levels and increased sediment.
    [Show full text]
  • Crow Wing River State Water Trail
    A S TAT E WAT E R T R A I L G U I D E TO T H E CROW W I N G R I V E R Paul Bunyan State Forest 50 120 34 Route Description of the Crow W ing River 105 64 Chippewa National Forest 25 NOTE: (R) and (L) represent right and left banks of the river when facing downstream. No rth Count ry 11th. 23 National Potato Lake Dam portage Scenic Trail RIVER MILE: 85 right 25 yards AKLEY 86 119.0 11th Crow Wing Lake is divided by Hwy. 64. Mostly lake paddling to the Big Sand Lake southTrail end of 5th Crow Wing Lake. 2 10th. 5 Akeley City Park Akeley City Park trailer access, campground, drinking water and rest area. River channel narrows, may be l 118.0 i overgrown with vegetation a 40 Trail 9th. 115 r The lake can also be accessed at the Akeley City Park. T 18 117.2 (L) Dam, portage left 25 yards around a small dam where the lake joins the e 49 t 71 34 12 4 a CrowWing River. River channel is narrow, may be overgrown with t Mann 64 L 71 S vegetation between lakes.Baby 18 82 Foot Tenmile 5 NEVIS n 117.0 FootWebb Bridge Portage. The river flows under the Heartland State Trail Heartland State 18 Lake a L Fish Hook Dam portage 8th. y trestle, then through a culvert under Hwy. 34 into a marshy area. Lake 6 n DORSET right 75 yards u Trailer access on 10th Crow Wing Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainerd Area
    R34W R33W R32W R31W R30W R0W R29W R0W R28W R27W R26W R25W R25W R27W R26W R25W R24W 95°0'0"W 94°55'0"W 94°50'0"W 94°45'0"W 94°40'0"W 94°35'0"W 94°30'0"W 94°25'0"W 94°20'0"W 94°15'0"W 94°10'0"W 94°5'0"W 94°0'0"W 93°55'0"W 93°50'0"W 93°45'0"W 93°40'0"W 93°35'0"W 93°30'0"W 93°25'0"W 93°20'0"W Steamboat River Blandin Dam Trout 1 6 1 6 1 6 6 Sugar Point Bog 1 6 1 6 Poole Bay 47°13'55"N Little Bear Creek 1 6 La Prairie Laporte Bear River 1 159 Buffalo Creek Garfield Swamp Goose Vermillion River Meyers Bay 146 501 Rice 190 Lake George 320 Battleground State Forest Leighton Brook Prairie RiverGunn 47°11'55"N MN12 304 326 Rice 170 George 219 36 31 Sugar Bay GPZ T55N 36 31 36 31 36 Elevenmile Corner 119 Steamboat Bay 47°11'55"N Bemidji Area Kabekona RiverGulch Creek Salter Bay 129 Skunk Brook Sugar Brook King Bay 412 Boy Bay Boy River 1 6 100 T143N 1 6 1 6 1 Dan Dick Creek Pokegama Blackberry 47°9'55"N 220 212 ¤£2 36 31 Y49 Boy River Kabekona Benedict 36 36 31 Welshes Bay 36 31 Sucker Branch 36 31 36 31 Sherry Arm Bay 47°9'55"N 36 31 Philbin 1 36 31 Sugar 6 Kabekona River 6 36 Siseebakwet 1 6 1 6 1 Traders Bay Leech EWM 1 6 Wendigo Arm Bay 47°7'55"N 1 6 1 6 9995 Kabekona Bay 1 Remer State Forest 370 T54N Baker 295 Deer River Area 47°7'55"N Big Thunder Peak Agency Bay Smith Creek B1 B2 Onigum Headquarters Bay Tobique 36 31 36 31 47°5'55"N Walker Walker Bay 36 31 36 T142N Boy Golden Anniversary State Forest 416 412 Loon Lake Dam 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 47°5'55"N 155 North Fork Willow River Kaylor Fishpond Dam Brevik Swift River 259 36 31 261 Uram Bay Emmaville
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp -f {.; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Association of Minnesota Division of Lands and Forestry Employees voted at the 1969 Annual Meeting to publish "A History of Forestry in Minne­ sota." Area Forester Joe Mockford, at that same meeting, offered $600 to help defray expenses. Since then, many people have helped make it a reality, and it is not possible for all to receive the credit they deserve. Dorothy Ewert brought the history up to date, the Grand Rapids Herald Re­ view and Chuck Wechsler of the Conservation Depart­ ment's Bureau of Information and Education helped a bunch of amateurs prepare it for printing. Ray Hitchcock, President of the Association, and Joe Gummerson ran the business end. Our thanks to all of these. "A History of Forestry in Minnesota" was com­ piled by Elizabeth Bachmann over a period of ten years. Miss Bachmann collected the data used in this publication and compiled it as a sort of legacy to the forestry fieldmen. • • I I With Parti lar Reference to restry Legislation Printed in 1965 Reprinted with Additions in 1969 i CLOQUET-MOOSE LAKE FOREST FIRE . 15 Burning Permit Law Enacted ... 19 Fire Cooperation, Weeks Law .. 19 Lands Reserved Along Lakeshores .. 19 Wm. T. Cox, State Forester, Dismissed .. 19 II Grover M. Conzet Appointed State Forester .. 20 1n nesota Clarke-McNary Law Aids State . 20 Fire Protection Problems 20 FOREST LAWS CODIFIED . 20 Forest Area Defined.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Minnesota Statutes 2013 89.021 89.021 State Forests
    1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 89.021 89.021 STATE FORESTS. Subdivision 1. Established. There are hereby established and reestablished as state forests, in accordance with the forest resource management policy and plan, all lands and waters now owned by the state or hereafter acquired by the state, excepting lands acquired for other specific purposes or tax-forfeited lands held in trust for the taxing districts unless incorporated therein as otherwise provided by law. History: 1943 c 171 s 1; 1963 c 332 s 1; 1982 c 511 s 9; 1990 c 473 s 3,6 Subd. 1a. Boundaries designated. The commissioner of natural resources may acquire by gift or purchase land or interests in land adjacent to a state forest. The commissioner shall propose legislation to change the boundaries of established state forests for the acquisition of land adjacent to the state forests, provided that the lands meet the definition of forest land as defined in section 89.001, subdivision 4. History: 2011 c 3 s 3 Subd. 2. Badoura State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1; 1967 c 514 s 1; 1980 c 424 Subd. 3. Battleground State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 4. Bear Island State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 5. Beltrami Island State Forest. History: 1943 c 171 s 1; 1963 c 332 s 1; 2000 c 485 s 20 subd 1; 2004 c 262 art 2 s 14 Subd. 6. Big Fork State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 7. Birch Lakes State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1; 2008 c 368 art 1 s 23 Subd.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Senate EIGHTY-SIXTH LEGISLATURE
    76TH DAY] THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 2010 7939 Journal of the Senate EIGHTY-SIXTH LEGISLATURE SEVENTY-SIXTH DAY St. Paul, Minnesota, Thursday, March 18, 2010 The Senate met at 11:00 a.m. and was called to order by the President. CALL OF THE SENATE Senator Pogemiller imposed a call of the Senate. The Sergeant at Arms was instructed to bring in the absent members. Prayer was offered by Senator Michael J. Jungbauer. The roll was called, and the following Senators answered to their names: Anderson Fischbach Kubly Ortman Sheran Bakk Fobbe Langseth Pappas Sieben Berglin Foley Latz Pariseau Skoe Betzold Frederickson Limmer Parry Skogen Bonoff Gerlach Lourey Pogemiller Sparks Carlson Gimse Lynch Prettner Solon Stumpf Chaudhary Hann Marty Rest Tomassoni Clark Higgins Metzen Robling Torres Ray Cohen Ingebrigtsen Michel Rosen Vandeveer Dahle Johnson Moua Rummel Vickerman Dibble Jungbauer Murphy Saltzman Wiger Dille Kelash Olseen Saxhaug Doll Koch Olson, G. Scheid Erickson Ropes Koering Olson, M. Senjem The President declared a quorum present. The reading of the Journal was dispensed with and the Journal, as printed and corrected, was approved. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES Senator Pogemiller moved that the Committee Reports at the Desk be now adopted. The motion prevailed. Senator Rest from the Committee on State and Local Government Operations and Oversight, to which was referred S.F. No. 2260: A bill for an act proposing an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution, article IV, section 12; adding a provision to allow legislators to call a special session. 7940 JOURNAL OF THE SENATE [76TH DAY Reports the same back with the recommendation that the bill be amended as follows: Page 1, line 18, delete "legislative"andinsert"calendar" And when so amended the bill do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Route Designation on State Forest Lands – Final Summary Source: Minnesota Dept
    31 Dec. 2008 Motor Route Designation on State Forest Lands – Final Summary Source: Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources, Parks & Trails Division, December 2008 Planning Unit DNR-Admin All Inventoried Forest Road All Permitted OHV Trail Mileage Routes Closed to [Forest Classification] Forest Land* Routes Mileage Vehicle Routes* [Rec Trail miles only] Motorized Use** (Acres) [miles] [miles] [miles] (Except as per MS 84.926) Lake Isabella St. Forest System Roads = 0.0 miles ATV = 0.0 miles ATV = 0.0 miles (Closed – North of Hwy 2) 66 acres 0.0 miles Min. Maint. Roads = 0.0 mi. OHM = 0.0 miles OHM = 0.0 miles Total = 0.0 miles ORV = 0.0 miles ORV = 0.0 miles Insula Lake State Forest System Roads = 0.0 miles ATV = 0.0 miles ATV = 0.0 miles (Closed – North of Hwy 2) 485 acres 0.0 miles Min. Maint. Roads = 0.0 mi. OHM = 0.0 miles OHM = 0.0 miles Total = 0.0 miles ORV = 0.0 miles ORV = 0.0 miles Pillsbury State Forest System Roads = 8.1 miles ATV = 0.0 miles ATV = 0.0 miles (Closed – South of Hwy 2) 10,080 acres 99.5 miles Min. Maint. Roads = 6.2 mi. OHM = 0.0 miles OHM = 0.0 miles Total = 85.2 miles ORV = 0.0 miles ORV = 0.0 miles Foothills State Forest 22,000 ac. DNR System Roads = 26.2 mi. ATV = 104.5 miles ATV = 40.9 miles (Limited – South of Hwy 2) and 311.5 miles Min. Maint. Roads = 37.4 mi. OHM = 104.5 miles OHM = 40.9 miles Total = 203.4 miles 54,000 ac.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the House [73Rd Day
    73RD DAY] THURSDAY, MARCH 11, 2010 8435 STATE OF MINNESOTA EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION - 2010 _____________________ SEVENTY-THIRD DAY SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA, THURSDAY, MARCH 11, 2010 The House of Representatives convened at 10:30 a.m. and was called to order by Melissa Hortman, Speaker pro tempore. Prayer was offered by the Reverend Dennis J. Johnson, House Chaplain. The members of the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. The Speaker assumed the Chair. The roll was called and the following members were present: Abeler Dettmer Hayden Lenczewski Norton Slawik Anderson, B. Dill Hilstrom Liebling Obermueller Slocum Anderson, P. Dittrich Hilty Lieder Olin Smith Anderson, S. Doepke Holberg Lillie Otremba Solberg Anzelc Doty Hoppe Loeffler Paymar Sterner Atkins Downey Hornstein Loon Pelowski Swails Beard Drazkowski Hortman Mack Peppin Thao Benson Eastlund Hosch Magnus Persell Thissen Bigham Eken Howes Mahoney Peterson Tillberry Bly Emmer Huntley Mariani Poppe Torkelson Brod Falk Jackson Marquart Reinert Urdahl Brown Faust Johnson Masin Rosenthal Wagenius Brynaert Fritz Juhnke McFarlane Rukavina Ward Buesgens Gardner Kahn McNamara Ruud Welti Bunn Garofalo Kalin Morgan Sailer Westrom Carlson Gottwalt Kath Morrow Sanders Winkler Champion Greiling Kelly Mullery Scalze Zellers Clark Gunther Kiffmeyer Murdock Scott Spk. Kelliher Cornish Hackbarth Knuth Murphy, E. Seifert Davids Hamilton Koenen Murphy, M. Sertich Davnie Hansen Kohls Nelson Severson Dean Hausman Laine Newton Shimanski Demmer Haws Lanning Nornes Simon A quorum was present. Lesch was excused. The Chief Clerk proceeded to read the Journal of the preceding day. Newton moved that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with and that the Journal be approved as corrected by the Chief Clerk.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghiver This Report Was Prepared By: L\1Anagelllent Lan the Wadena County Advisory Committee
    ral Resources " nai · February 1977 ~ 16~ .e,o5 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) gHiver This report was prepared by: l\1anagelllent lan The Wadena County advisory committee: Emil Burgau Crow Wing River Tim Frieday Jan Holden Greg Kempf Harold Kinnunen Joyce Line Russel Nanik Abner Roche Hubert Schermerhorn Tom Schulz Jack Stigman Doug Swanson David Tellock Frances Tellock Jeanne Tellock Roger Tellock Chuck Winkels Rivers Section, Division of Parks and Recreation: Arne Steff erud, rivers project coordinator James Weseloh, rivers project leader Dale Homuth, rivers project leader Kathy Brandl, student intern Jane Harper, researcher Greg Breining, rivers project coordinator Michael Priesnitz, rivers coordinator I I' This management plan, prepared by the Minnesota Summary Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and an advisory board of Wadena County residents, recommends that the stretch of the Crow Wing River in Wadena County be included in the Minnesota Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers System. The DNR and county residents revised the plan after public meetings on the proposal in April. The DNR feels that the Crow Wing River qualifies for "Wild" and "Scenic" classifications under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 197 3. The act was passed by the legislature to "preserve and protect" rivers with "outstanding scenic-, recreational, natural, historical, scientific and similar values." This report is divided into three major sections: Analysis, Management Plan and Appendix.
    [Show full text]