DOCSLIB.ORG

The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1St Edition Download Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1St Edition Download Free THE ORIGINS OF THE PRESENT TROUBLES IN NORTHERN IRELAND 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Caroline Kennedy-Pipe | 9780582100732 | | | | | The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland Lists with This Book. The incident invigorated the civil rights movement. Inthe Provisional IRA killed approximately members of the security forces, wounded others, and carried out approximately 1, bombings, [] mostly against commercial targets which they considered "the artificial economy". The bomb, which exploded in the early hours of the morning, killed five people, including Conservative MP Sir Anthony Berryand injured thirty-four others. A peace line was to be established to separate physically the Falls and the Shankill communities. Northern Ireland: Conflict and Change. Loyalists Where They Were Missed by Lucy Caldwell The Troubles, here, are a form of distant illumination that makes heartbreakingly sad the lives played out in their shadow. He predicted the war would last another 20 years. The loyalist paramilitaries, temporarily united in the " Combined Loyalist Military Command ", reciprocated six weeks later. Alessandra added it May 23, Error rating book. The Troubles were brought to an uneasy end by a peace process that included the declaration of ceasefires by most paramilitary organisations, the complete decommissioning of the IRA's weapons, the reform of the police, and the withdrawal of the British Army from the streets and sensitive Irish border areas such as South Armagh and County Fermanaghas agreed by the signatories to the Belfast Agreement commonly known as the "Good Friday Agreement". Despite the British government's attempt to do "nothing that would suggest The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1st edition to one section of the community" and the improvement of the relationship between the Army and the local population following the Army assistance with flood relief in Augustthe Falls Curfew and a situation that was described at the time as "an inflamed sectarian one, which is being deliberately exploited by the IRA and other extremists" meant that relations between the Catholic population and the British Army rapidly deteriorated. This was one of the most prominent events that occurred during the Troubles as it was recorded as the largest number of civilians killed in a single shooting incident. BBC The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1st edition, 9 June A security normalisation process also began as part of the treaty, which comprised the progressive closing of redundant British Army barracks, border observation towers, and the withdrawal of all forces taking part in Operation Banner — including the resident battalions of the Royal Irish Regiment — that would be replaced by an infantry brigadedeployed in ten sites around Northern Ireland but with no operative role in the province. On 14—15 August, British troops were deployed in Derry and Belfast to restore order, [97] but did not try to enter the Bogside, bringing a temporary end to the riots. There are several reasons offered for why violence escalated in these years. The term has been used The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1st edition to describe other periods of Irish history. Unionists were split over Sunningdale, which was also opposed by the IRA, whose goal remained nothing short of an end to the existence of Northern Ireland as part of the UK. In response to the campaign for Home Rule which started in the s, unionists, mostly Protestant and largely concentrated in Ulster, had resisted both self-government and independence for Ireland, fearing for their future in an overwhelmingly Catholic country dominated by the Roman Catholic Church. This resulted in unionist control of areas such as Derry City, Fermanagh, and Tyrone where they were actually a minority of voters. Most of the killings in Belfast took place in the west and north of the city. By the late s, war-weariness was visible in both communities. Sean rated it it was ok Dec 05, Lagan Books. Retrieved 6 April On 24 Augustthe civil rights movement held its first civil rights march, from Coalisland to Dungannon. Ultimately, however, the Sunningdale Agreement was brought down by mass action on the part of loyalist paramilitaries primarily the Ulster Defence Association, at that time over 20, strong [ citation needed ] and workers, who The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1st edition the Ulster Workers' Council. CUA Press. Lexington Books. Retrieved 12 June Retrieved 27 September Poolbeg, Although republicans and some members of the IRA then led by Cathal Goulding and pursuing a non-violent agenda helped to create and drive the movement, they did not control it and were not a dominant faction within it. Loyalists hoped the bombings would force O'Neill to resign and bring an end to any concessions to nationalists. Also known internationally as the Northern Ireland conflict[18] [19] [20] [21] it is sometimes described as an " irregular war " [22] [23] [24] or " low-level war ". At Burntollet Bridge the marchers were attacked by about loyalists, including some off-duty police officers, armed with iron bars, bricks and bottles in a planned ambush. Milkman by Anna Burns The Irish have a faith in language beyond all proof or reason; Anna Burns writes like a working-class kabbalist. Chapter 1 Introduction, pg 1—1. For over a quarter of a century now the British Army has been involved in the bloody and protracted struggle in the province. A firebomb killed an elderly Protestant widow, Matilda Gould. Retrieved 1 September The Troubles One part of the Agreement is that Northern Ireland will remain within the United Kingdom unless a majority of the Northern Irish electorate vote otherwise. Retrieved 6 April Following the foundation of the republican Society of the United Irishmen by Presbyterians, Catholics, and liberal Anglicans, and the resulting failed Irish Rebellion ofsectarian violence between Catholics and Protestants continued. Milestones in Murder: Defining moments in Ulster's terror war. Other Editions 7. English police forces. After the Irish Civil War of —, this part of the treaty was given less priority by the new Dublin government led by W. British troops and police investigate a couple behind the Europa Hotel. Nationalists argue that the British Government did not do enough to The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1st edition this strike and uphold the Sunningdale initiative. Increasing tensions led to severe violence in August and the deployment of British troopsin what became the British Army 's longest ever operation. Main article: Partition of Ireland. In Junefollowing the publication of a British White Paper and a referendum in March on the status of Northern Ireland, a new parliamentary body, the Northern Ireland Assemblywas established. A month later it shot three Catholic civilians as they left a pub, killing Peter Ward, a Catholic from the Falls Road. Courtney Leibrandt rated it it was ok Mar 23, Irish Studies in International Affairs. As the Penal Laws started The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1st edition be phased out in the latter part of the 18th century, there was more competition for land, as restrictions were lifted on the Irish Catholic ability to rent. Mercier Press, In response to the campaign for Home Rule which started in the s, unionists, mostly Protestant and largely concentrated in Ulster, had resisted both self-government and independence for Ireland, fearing for their future in an overwhelmingly Catholic country dominated by the Roman Catholic Church. Caroline Kennedy-Pipe. Loyalists especially members of the UPV attacked some of the marches and held counter-demonstrations in a bid to get the marches banned. Eddieman22 marked it as to-read Nov 17, From Containment to Ulsterization, 6. Retrieved 7 December The Guardian. Lost Lives: The stories of the men, women and children who died as a result of the Northern Ireland Troubles. Retrieved 24 April Unionists and Home Rule advocates were the main political factions in late 19th- and early 20th-century Ireland. Henry Holt and Company. The UK government in London, believing the Northern Ireland administration incapable of containing the security situation, sought to take over the control of law and order there. Republic of Ireland topics Northern Ireland topics. A Farewell to Arms? Poolbeg, Inthe United States appointed George J. One such incident was the The Origins of the Present Troubles in Northern Ireland 1st edition Curfew in Julywhen 3, troops imposed a curfew on the nationalist Lower Falls area of Belfast, firing more than 1, rounds of ammunition in gun battles with the Official IRA, and killing four people. FitzGerald warned Callaghan that the failure to intervene, despite Ireland's inability to do so, would "threaten democratic government in the Republic", which in turn jeopardised British and European security against Communist and other foreign nations. After a prolonged period of background political manoeuvring, during which the Baltic Exchange and Bishopsgate bombings occurred in London, both loyalist and republican paramilitary groups declared ceasefires in The new IRA was willing to take on the role of "defenders of the Catholic community", [] rather than seeking working-class ecumenical unity across both communities. In the s there were 10, vandalised empty houses in Belfast alone. A number of people died in this violence, including a Catholic taxi driver, killed by the Loyalist Volunteer Forceand three of four nominally Catholic brothers from a mixed-religion family died when their house in Ballymoney was petrol-bombed. Loyalists hoped the bombings would force O'Neill to resign and bring an end to any concessions to nationalists. The Irish government so dreaded the consequences of an independent Northern Ireland that FitzGerald refused to ask the British not to withdraw—as he feared that openly discussing the issue could permit the British to proceed—and other members of government opposed the Irish Cabinet even discussing what FitzGerald referred to as a "doomsday scenario".
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Carry On, but Don't Get Caught”- Margaret Thatcher, British State
    “Carry on, but don’t get caught”- Margaret Thatcher, British State collusion and the murder of Pat Finucane By Dr Stephen Kelly The decision on behalf of the Council of Europe to re-open a case concerning the murder of prominent Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane in 1989 has resurrected a fiercely contested debate surrounding the extent of collusion between the British state and Loyalist paramilitaries during Margaret Thatcher’s premiership, writes Stephen Kelly. On 12 March 2021, at a meeting of the Council of Europe, attended by government officials of its 47 member states, Europe’s leading human rights body announced its decision to re- open Finuance’s case. This move ensures that the body will monitor how the United Kingdom addresses ‘the fact there has never been an adequate investigation into the 1989 shooting’.1 This decision on behalf of the Council of Europe comes less than four months after the British government’s announcement, on 30 November 2020, not to order a public enquiry into Finucane’s murder at the hands of the Ulster Defence Association (UDA)/Ulster Freedom Fighters (UFF) in February 1989. Although Brandon Lewis, secretary of state for Northern Ireland, has previously acknowledged state collusion and apologised to the Finucane family, speaking in the House of Commons in November of last year, he stipulated that there would be no inquiry into Finucane’s murder pending a new review conducted by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI). This decision was reached despite a Supreme Court ruling that the British government’s failure to properly investigate Finucane’s murder was in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights.2 1 See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-56370608.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Thatcher, State Collusion, and the Murder of Pat Finucane Page 1 of 2
    British Politics and Policy at LSE: Margaret Thatcher, state collusion, and the murder of Pat Finucane Page 1 of 2 Margaret Thatcher, state collusion, and the murder of Pat Finucane The UK government’s recent decision not to establish a public enquiry into the 1989 murder of Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane has resurrected a contested debate surrounding the extent of collusion between the British state and Loyalist paramilitaries during Margaret Thatcher’s premiership. Stephen Kelly discusses some of the evidence surrounding this case. On 30 November 2020, Brandon Lewis, secretary of state for Northern Ireland announced that the British government had decided not to order a public enquiry into the 1989 murder of Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane at the hands of Ulster Freedom Fighters (UFF). Although Lewis acknowledged state collusion and apologised to the Finucane family, he noted that there would be no inquiry pending a new review conducted by the Police Service of Northern Ireland. This decision was reached despite a Supreme Court ruling that the government’s failure to properly investigate Finucane’s murder was in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. In my new book, Margaret Thatcher, the Conservative Party and Northern Ireland, 1975-1990, I reveal the extend of collusion between elements of the state and Loyalist paramilitaries throughout Thatcher’s premiership. Accusations of alleged collusion existed long before Thatcher’s arrival at No. 10 Downing Street. During the mid-1970s, for example, the British security forces and Loyalist paramilitaries were allegedly involved in a series of horrendous acts of violence, including murder. These included the Dublin-Monaghan bombings in 1974 and the Miami Showband killings in 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Elegant Letter
    LAWYERS’ RIGHTS WATCH CANADA Promoting human rights by protecting those who defend them 3220 West 13th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. CANADA V6K 2V5 Tel: +1-604-738-0338 Fax: +1-604-736-1175 Toll free Canada/US 1 877 662 7344 Email: [email protected] www.lrwc.org February 18, 2005 The Right Honourable Tony Blair 10 Downing Street London, England SW1A 2AA The Right Honourable Lord Goldsmith Attorney General’s Chambers 9 Buckingham Gate London, England SW1E 6JP Dear Sirs: Re: A. Lawyers’ Rights Watch of Canada (LRWC) B. Murder of Mr. Patrick Finucane, Solicitor, February 12, 1989 C. Hearing under the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921; and D. International Response to the Finucane Case – Appendix 1 ______________________________________________________________________ Lawyers’ Rights Watch of Canada (LRWC) is a national organization that advocates on behalf of lawyers to protect their rights to independence and security and to ensure their ability to practice free from reprisals. Circumstances surrounding the death of Mr. Patrick Finucane fall within our mandate. 1.0 LRWC Position 1.1 LRWC joins with the Finucane family and other intervenors to demand that the United Kingdom government immediately institute an inquiry under the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act of 1921 (“1921 Act”) into the 1989 murder in Northern Ireland of lawyer Patrick Finucane. The inquiry must comply with national and international standards including those set out in the UN Manual on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal and Summary Executions. These standards require that such an inquiry be: – 2 – Feburary 18, 2005 a) independent of all government agencies accused or alleged to be culpable by omission or commission; b) empowered to compel testimony and the production of documents; c) transparent; d) empowered to exhaustively investigate all of the unresolved allegations of collusion by government agents; and e) empowered to recommend appropriate prosecutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Conseil De L'europe Council of Europe Cour
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 29178/95 by Geraldine FINUCANE against the United Kingdom The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 2 July 2002 as a Chamber composed of Mr M. PELLONPÄÄ, President, Sir Nicolas BRATZA, Mr A. PASTOR RIDRUEJO, Mrs E. PALM, Mr M. FISCHBACH, Mr J. CASADEVALL, Mr S. PAVLOVSCHI, judges, and Mr M. O’BOYLE, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 5 July 1995, Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, by which the competence to examine the application was transferred to the Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: 2 FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM DECISION THE FACTS The applicant, Geraldine Finucane, is an Irish national, who was born in 1950 and lives in Belfast. She was represented before the Court by Mr P. Madden, a lawyer practising in Belfast. A. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. At around 7.25 p.m. on 12 February 1989 the applicant’s husband, solicitor Patrick Finucane, was killed in front of her and their three children by two masked men who broke into their home. She herself was injured, probably by a ricochet bullet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murder of Patrick Finucane
    The Report of the Patrick Finucane Review The Rt Hon Sir Desmond de Silva QC December 2012 Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 12 December 2012 for The Report of the Patrick Finucane Review The Rt Hon Sir Desmond de Silva QC Volume I Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 12 December 2012 HC 802-I London: The Stationery Office £75.00 Two volumes not to be sold separately © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk This document is also available from our website at www.patfinucanereview.org ISBN: 9780102981087 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 254679 12/12 23621 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Contents Foreword 1 Executive Summary and Principal Conclusions 3 CHAPTER 1 Background to this Review 25 Introduction 25 Interpretation of my Terms of Reference 26 Methodology 31 Previous investigations and the Judgment in Finucane v The United Kingdom 39 The right to life 45 PART 1: THE CONTEXT TO THE MURDER OF PATRICK FINUCANE CHAPTER 2 The
    [Show full text]
  • Sean Mackin Story by Brian Mor O'baoighill Pg
    r*» PEOPLE 7/ c oj irish Republicanism in America JUNE 2, 1990 VOL. 17 NO. 19 50 CENTS 2 MEITHEAMH 1990 IMLEABHAR 17 UIMHIR 19 Show Trial Continues in Boston By Daithi O h-Oisin A secret agreement for international prosecution is the latest tactic of the Bush administration in the trial of Richard Johnson and three co-defendents, now in its fourth week at Boston's Federal Court. After importing a British Army colonel last week, Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Stearns called on a Special Branch Inspector from Dublin and an RUC constable as prosecution witnesses. Gardai Inspector Dermot Jennings testified on Wednesday that he had not yet been promoted from detective sergeant when he found the Clondalkin letters in Peter Maguire's garage during Operation Mallard in October 1987. The operation was a nationwide search of 50,000 homes throughout the 26 counties. Stearns led Jennings through rambling testimony connecting indictee Pe­ The Stevens Report into incidents of ter Maguire to Dessie Ellis as an "associate". When asked if he personally British crown forces colluding with loyalist knew Ellis, Jennings pompously replied: "I can claim that privilege," and paramilitaries has received scant attention admitted to being a witness at Ellis' extradition trial in Dublin. But when since its publication last week. Like so Stearns next asked him his view of Sinn Fein as the political wing of the IRA, many previous inquiries carried out by vociferous defense objections to personal opinion being stated as knowledge senior British judges and police officers, it caused Judge Mazzone to excuse the jury while a bench conference was held.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Peace with the Past
    Making Peace with the Past: Options for truth recovery regarding the conflict in and about Northern Ireland Healing Through Remembering Making Peace with the Past: Options for truth recovery regarding the conflict in and about Northern Ireland HEALING THROUGH REMEMBERING MAKING PEACE WITH THE PAST OPTIONS FOR TRUTH RECOVERY REGARDING THE CONFLICT IN AND ABOUT NORTHERN IRELAND Healing Through Remembering PRODUCED AND PUBLISHED BY HEALING THROUGH REMEMBERING WRITTEN BY PROF. KIERAN McEVOY OCTOBER 2006 ISBN 1 905882 07 6 (10 DIGIT) ISBN 978 1 905882 07 6 (13 DIGIT) The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect the personal views of all members of Healing Through Remembering. To be ordered directly from Healing Through Remembering Alexander House, 17a Ormeau Avenue, Belfast Tel: +44 28 9023 8844 Email: [email protected] Reports can also be downloaded from www.healingthroughremembering.org Making Peace with the Past: Options for truth recovery regarding the conflict in and about Northern Ireland This report was developed by the following members of the Healing Through Remembering Truth Recovery and Acknowledgement Sub Group Sarah Alldred Marie Breen Smyth Emily Brough Pat Conway Séamas Heaney Gareth Higgins Avila Kilmurray Patricia Lundy Stephen Martin Roy McClelland Kieran McEvoy Jackie McMullan Raymond Murray Paul O’Connor David W. Porter Dawn Purvis Andrew Rawding Joe Rice Mike Ritchie Tom Roberts Mark Thompson Irwin Turbitt Alan Wardle Written by Kieran McEvoy Core Consultant and Facilitator Brandon Hamber Project Co-ordinator Kate Turner Support Staff Lainey Dunne Elaine Armstrong Sara Templer Overseen and supported by the Board of Healing Through Remembering Marie Breen Smyth Sean Coll Claire Hackett Maureen Hetherington Alan McBride Roy McClelland Jackie McMullan Dawn Purvis Geraldine Smyth Oliver Wilkinson Healing Through Remembering Acknowledgements Healing Through Remembering would like to thank a number of people who have been extremely helpful in the writing and production of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Peace with the Past : Options for Truth Recovery in Northern Ireland
    Making Peace with the Past : Options for Truth Recovery In Northern Ireland McEvoy, K. (2006). Making Peace with the Past : Options for Truth Recovery In Northern Ireland. Healing Through Remembering. Document Version: Early version, also known as pre-print Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:24. Sep. 2021 Making Peace with the Past: Options for truth recovery regarding the conflict in and about Northern Ireland Healing Through Remembering Making Peace with the Past: Options for truth recovery regarding the conflict in and about Northern Ireland HEALING THROUGH REMEMBERING MAKING PEACE WITH THE PAST OPTIONS FOR TRUTH RECOVERY REGARDING THE CONFLICT IN AND ABOUT NORTHERN IRELAND Healing Through Remembering PRODUCED AND PUBLISHED BY HEALING THROUGH REMEMBERING WRITTEN BY PROF. KIERAN McEVOY OCTOBER 2006 ISBN 1 905882 07 6 (10 DIGIT) ISBN 978 1 905882 07 6 (13 DIGIT) The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect the personal views of all members of Healing Through Remembering.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the "Troubles" in Northern Ireland
    COUNTER-TERRORISM MEASURES AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: A CASE STUDY OF THE “TROUBLES” IN NORTHERN IRELAND JULIANA VAN HOEVEN “In Northern Ireland, the past is the present. If we don’t deal with the past, I don’t want my grandchildren's rights to have to suffer this again. As injured people, we are living scars in society and we need to have it recognised that we have suffered.“ – Peter Heathwood, paralyzed victim of a gunshot wound delivered by suspected loyalist gunmen in September, 1979.1 1 Northern Ireland: Amnesty Slams Failure to Deal with Past, AMNESTY INT’L UK PRESS RELEASES (Sept. 12, 2013, 12:00AM), http://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-re- leases/northern-ireland-amnesty-slams-failure-deal-past [perma.cc/KN8B-TK9F] (last visited Feb. 4, 2016). 1091 Published by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, 2016 1092 U. Pa. J. Int’l L. [Vol. 37:3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 1093 2. BACKGROUND & HISTORY OF NORTHERN IRELAND ............ 1102 2.1. Paramilitaries as Terrorists and the Implications of the Geneva Conventions ......................................... 1108 2.2. The British Forces and International Human Rights Violations .................................................................. 1113 3. ATTEMPTS TO LITIGATE TROUBLES’ CASES ............................ 1123 3.1. Domestic Struggles .................................................. 1123 3.2. International Judgments: The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Troubles ........... 1127 3.2.1. The Case of Patrick Finucane ............................. 1129 3.2.2. The Case of Pearse Jordan .................................. 1138 4. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND COUNTER-TERRORISM MEASURES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM ............................ 1142 5. IMPACTS OF LITIGATING THE TROUBLES’ CLAIMS ................ 1149 6. CONCLUSION ........................................................................... 1151 https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol37/iss3/6 2016] THE “TROUBLES” IN NORTHERN IRELAND 1093 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Full PDF Version
    LAWYERS ’ RIGHTS WATCH CANADA Promoting human rights by protecting those who defend them 3220 West 13 th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. CANADA V6K 2V5 Tel: +1-604-738-0338 Fax: +1-604-736-1175 Toll free Canada/US 1 877 662 7344 Email: [email protected] www.lrwc.org February 23, 2005 The Right Honourable Tony Blair 10 Downing Street London, England SW1A 2AA The Right Honourable Lord Goldsmith Attorney General’s Chambers 9 Buckingham Gate London, England SW1E 6JP Dear Sirs: Re: A. Lawyers’ Rights Watch of Canada (LRWC) B. Murder of Mr. Patrick Finucane, Solicitor, February 12, 1989 C. Hearing under the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921 ; and D. International Response to the Finucane Case – Appendix 1 ______________________________________________________________________ Lawyers’ Rights Watch of Canada (LRWC) is a committee of Canadian lawyers that supports the rule of law and human rights internationally by campaigning: a) for implementation of adequate independence and security safeguards for lawyers; b) in support of lawyers in danger because of their advocacy; and c) against impunity for violators of advocates’ rights. 1.0 LRWC Position 1.1 LRWC joins with the Finucane family and other interveners to demand that the United Kingdom government immediately institute an inquiry under the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act of 1921 (“ 1921 Act ”) into the 1989 murder in Northern Ireland of lawyer Patrick Finucane. The inquiry must comply with national and international standards including those set out in the UN Manual on the Effective – 2 – Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal and Summary Executions . These standards require that such an inquiry be: a) independent of all government agencies accused or alleged to be culpable by omission or commission; b) empowered to compel testimony and the production of documents; c) transparent; d) empowered to exhaustively investigate all of the unresolved allegations of collusion by government agents; and e) empowered to recommend appropriate prosecutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Final 01/10/2003
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION CASE OF FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no. 29178/95) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 July 2003 FINAL 01/10/2003 FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Finucane v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr M. PELLONPÄÄ, President, Sir Nicolas BRATZA, Mrs E. PALM, Mr M. FISCHBACH, Mr J. CASADEVALL, Mr S. PAVLOVSCHI, Mr J. BORREGO BORREGO, judges, and Mr M. O'BOYLE, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 10 June 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 29178/95) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Irish national, Mrs Geraldine Finucane (“the applicant”), on 5 July 1994. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr P. Madden, a lawyer practising in Belfast. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr C. Whomersley, of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 3. The applicant alleged that there had been no proper, effective investigation into the death of her husband, Patrick Finucane. 4. The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No.
    [Show full text]
  • Geraldine Finucane for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
    Hilary Term [2019] UKSC 7 On appeal from: [2017] NICA 7 JUDGMENT In the matter of an application by Geraldine Finucane for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) before Lady Hale, President Lord Kerr Lord Carnwath Lord Hodge Lady Black JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 27 February 2019 Heard on 26 and 27 June 2018 Appellant Respondent Barry Macdonald QC Sir James Eadie QC Fiona Doherty QC Paul McLaughlin BL (Instructed by Madden & (Instructed by Crown Finucane) Solicitor’s Office) LORD KERR: (with whom Lady Hale, Lord Hodge and Lady Black agree) Introduction 1. On the evening of 12 February 1989, gunmen burst into the North Belfast home of Patrick Finucane, a solicitor. He was having supper with his wife and three children. In their presence he was brutally murdered. He was shot 14 times. Mrs Finucane was injured by a ricocheting bullet which struck her on the ankle. This shocking and dreadful event still ranks, almost 30 years later, as one of the most notorious of what are euphemistically called “the Northern Ireland troubles”. 2. Mrs Finucane and her children have waged a relentless campaign since Patrick’s killing to have a proper investigation conducted into the circumstances in which he was murdered. It became clear at an early stage that those responsible were soi-disant loyalists. Before long, it also emerged that there was collusion between Mr Finucane’s murderers and members of the security forces. Various investigations about the murder and the nature of the collusion have been conducted. None of these has uncovered the identity of those members of the security services who engaged in the collusion nor the precise nature of the assistance which they gave to the murderers.
    [Show full text]