Electric Power Lines and Bird Conservation Along the Danube River
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Current Demographic and Urban Problems in the Danubian Dobrudzha (Region Bulgaria)
QUAESTUS MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL CURRENT DEMOGRAPHIC AND URBAN PROBLEMS IN THE DANUBIAN DOBRUDZHA (REGION BULGARIA) Milen Penerliev Abstract: The administrative units in Dobrudzha in Bulgarian part of the Danube are municipalities of Silistra and Tutrakan. The demographic crisis is a very negative fact in Bulgaria. The article examines the contemporary situation in this part of the country. It researches the trend of decreasing number of population, the reasons and the trends in the future. The decreasing number of children in schools is pointed out. An attempt has made to highlight the specific problems for this part in the country through a comparative analysis. The author describes the reasons for these trends. Keywords: population, urban, Danubian Dobrudzha, problems, trends INTRODUCTION Territorial range Danubian Dobrudzha in Northern part of Bulgarian territory comprises Tutrakan, Glavinitsa, Sitovo and Silistra municipalities. The Southern and Western boundary is disputed but it considers all territory of Silistra municipalities and mostly of Tutrakan municipality goes into the range of Bulgarian part of Danubean Dobrudzha. With them are Glavinitsa and Sitovo municipalities with outlet on the Danube River. Without details this area border with Ludogorie (Deliorman – in Turkish language). And the border between them passes through Tutrakan municipality Southern Staro selo village, alongside Kolofapa gorge encircle Tutracanian forest plateau Boblata, then passes Northern from Shumentsi village through Dabtaka gorge continue on Elbasan hill between Antimovo and Tsarev dol and then through Bogdantsi and Zefirovo villages alongside the road Tutrakan – Silistra through Kolarovo and Nova Dolina villages after this passes the land of Polyana village, the border goes down to Sitovo village (Iliev, 2007). -
Studia Academica Šumenensia
THE UNIVERSITY OF SHUMEN THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY STUDIA ACADEMICA ŠUMENENSIA THE EMPIRE AND BARBARIANS IN SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE IN LATE ANTIQUITY AND EARLY MIDDLE AGES edited by Stoyan Vitlyanov and Ivo Topalilov Vol. 1, 2014 The University of Shumen Press STUDIA ACADEMICA ŠUMENENSIA THE UNIVERSITY OF SHUMEN THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY edited by Stoyan Vitlyanov and Ivo Topalilov ISSN 2367-5446 THE UNIVERSITY OF SHUMEN PRESS Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................5 The portrait of Flavius Aetius (390-454) from Durostorum (Silistra) inscribed on a consular diptych from Monza ....................................................................7 Georgi Atanasov And now, what’s going to happen to us without barbarians? ........................22 Monika Milosavljević German discoveries at Sucidava-Celei in the 6th century ..............................39 Dorel Bondoc Mirela Cojoc The beginnings of the Vandals settlement in the Danube area ......................51 Artur Błażejewski Observations on the Barbarian presence in the province of Moesia Secunda in Late Antiquity ...................................................................................................65 Alexander Stanev Two bronze late antique buckles with Christian inscriptions in Greek from Northeast Bulgaria ............................................................................................87 Totyu -
PAD-Wetlands Restoration and Pollution Reduction Project
BULGARIA Wetlands Restoration and Pollution Reduction Project Project Appraisal Document Europe and Central Asia Region Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Department Date : May 17, 2002 Team Leader : Rita E. Cestti Country Director : Andrew N. Vorkink Sector Manager : Marjory-Anne Bromhead Project ID : P068858 Sector(s) : VM - Natural Resources Management Theme(s): Environment Focal Area: I - International Waters Poverty Targeted Intervention : N Project Financing Data [ ] Loan [ ] Credit [ X] Grant [ ] Guarantee [ ] Other: For Loans/Credits/Others: Amount (US$m): US$ 7.50 million equivalent (SDR 6.1 million) Financing Plan (US$m): Source Local Foreign Total BORROWER/RECIPIENT 2.50 0.40 2.90 LOCAL COMMUNITIES 0.15 0.00 0.15 EC: PHARE 0.00 1.59 1.59 AUSTRIA, GOV. OF (EXCEPT FOR FED 0.19 0.19 0.38 CHANCELLERY-DG DEV COOP) GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY 2.98 4.52 7.50 BILATERAL AGENCIES (UNIDENTIFIED) 0.33 0.43 0.76 Total: 6.15 7.13 13.28 Borrower/Recipient: GOVERNMENT OF BULGARIA Responsible agency : MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER Wetlands Restoration and Pollution Reduction Project - Project Coordination Unit Address: Ministry of Environment and Water 22 Maria Luisa Blvd., Room 408 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria Contact Person: Ms. Marietta Stoimenova, Project Manager Tel: (359-2) 940-6551/940-6610 Fax: (359-2) 980-8734 Email: Wetlands_ppu@ moew.government.bg Estimated Disbursements ( Bank FY/US$m): FY 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Annual 0.60 1.54 1.93 1.81 1.19 0.43 Cumulative 0.60 2.14 4.07 5.88 7.07 7.50 Project implementation period : 5 years. -
F Anlalyticl Creative Givup 1000, Sofia, 5, Pirotska Str., Tel: (359 2) 987 34 65, GSM: 359 88 701 707, E-Mail: Suegmain Infotel.Bg
/f Anlalyticl_Creative Givup 1000, Sofia, 5, Pirotska Str., tel: (359 2) 987 34 65, GSM: 359 88 701 707, E-mail: suegmain infotel.bg Public Disclosure Authorized E545 WETLANDS RESTORATION AND POLLUTION Public Disclosure Authorized REDUCTION PROJECT GEF TF 024837 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized SOFIA, 2002 FILE COPY Analvtical Creative Group LTD TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BACKGROUND 4 11.1. DANUBE RIVERSIDE AND ISLANDS 4 11.1.1. Location of Project Areas 4 11.1.2. Legislative and Institutional Framework 4 11.1.3. Supporting Information 5 11.2. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES 5 11.2.1. Belene Island 5 11.2.2. Kalimok-Brushlen 6 III. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT SITUATION. FORECAST AND ASSESSMENT OF EXPECTED IMPACT OF THE PROJECT ON ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS 8 111.1. INFRASTRUCTURE 8 111.1.1. Existing infrastructure 8 111.1.2. Facilities to Be Affected by the Proposed Restoration of Wetlands 14 111.1.3. Forecast of Expected Impact 17 111.2. ATMOSPHERIC AIR 17 111.2.1. Climate 17 111.2.2. Specific phenomena affecting the environmental situation in the Danube lands and the their vegetation 21 111.2.3. Sources of atmospheric pollution and their potential impact on the project area. 22 111.2.4. Possible project implementation results 22 111.3. SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER 22 111.3.1. The river Danube 22 111.3.2. Sediments (alluvia) 24 111.3.3. Groundwater 24 111.3.4. Soil humidity 24 111.3.5. Water quality and pollution sources 25 111.3.6. Pollution sources affecting the project areas 25 111.3.7. -
Wetland Restoration and Pollution Reduction Project Communication
WETLAND RESTORATION AND POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT GEF TF 050706 BUL _____________________________________________________________________ COMMUNICATION STRATEGY April 2004 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 Abbreviations.............................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 5 1. Background Information.......................................................................................................7 1.1 Project Description............................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Situation Description.......................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Strategy Development........................................................................................................9 2. Strategy Objectives .............................................................................................................. 10 3. Situation Analysis................................................................................................................. 11 4. Target audiences and messages........................................................................................... 12 4.1 Local stakeholders.......................................................................................................... -
Bulgaria: Expanding Procredit's Operations in Rural Areas, No. 4
First Page Bulgaria.qxd 16/03/2004 17:02 Page 1 FAO INVESTMENT CENTRE / EBRD REPORT SERIES - N. 4 - JANUARY 2004 COOPERATION PROGRAMME Bulgaria Expanding ProCredit’s Operations in Rural Areas Study Supported Under the Balkan Region Special Fund Food and Agriculture Organization European Bank of the United Nations for Reconstruction and Development BULGARIA EXPANDING PROCREDIT’S OPERATIONS IN RURAL AREAS TABLE OF CONTENTS CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS/ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................ii-ix 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................1 2. THE BULGARIAN AGRICULTURAL SECTOR............................................................3 A Summary of Key Features ................................................................................................3 Positive Factors for Rural Investment.......................................................................3 Negative Factors for Rural Investment .....................................................................6 3. DEMAND ASSESSMENT....................................................................................................8 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................8 Potential Borrowers...............................................................................................................8 -
S Bulgarian–Swiss Biodiversity Conservation Programme
Important Bird Areas in Europe – Bulgaria ■ BULGARIA IRINA KOSTADINOVA White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus in Atanasovo lake (IBA 036). (PHOTO: SVETOSLAV SPASOV/BSPB) GENERAL INTRODUCTION immediately south of the Stara Planina mountains; (4) the high mountains of Rila, Pirin and Rhodopi in the south-west, with the Bulgaria covers 110,994 km2 and is bounded to the east by the Black highest point at 2,925 m; and (5) the Black Sea coast, which is mostly Sea, to the south by Turkey and Greece, to the west by Yugoslavia flat but with some sea cliffs in the north. and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and to the north There are 50 Important Bird Areas (IBAs) in Bulgaria (Table 1), by Romania. The country can be divided into five main regions: covering a total area of 7,002 km2, or 6.3% of the land area of the (1) the fertile plain of the River Danube along the border with country (Kostadinova 1997). The IBAs lie mainly along the River Romania; (2) the Stara Planina mountains, a 600-km-long chain Danube and the Black Sea coast, as well as in the central and eastern running east–west across the country, with the highest point (Botev) Stara Planina mountains and in the south-west of the country. The at 2,376 m; (3) the central plain and valleys of the Maritsa river first pan-European IBA inventory (Grimmett and Jones 1989) Map 1. Location, area and criteria category of Important ROMANIA Bird Areas in Bulgaria. 32 33 30 31 39 48 6 7 9 8 25 50 BLACK 17 24 SEA 2 18 49 38 47 46 5 45 1 29 44 Highest category of criteria met by IBA YUGOSLAVIA 11 43 4 A (36 IBAs) 28 36 37 35 B (14 IBAs) 10 34 42 Area of IBA (ha) 16 23 41 8,700 to 156,000 15 22 26 27 40 1,990 to 8,699 21 500 to 1,989 3 20 13 to 499 13 14 TURKEY 19 REPUBLIC OF 12 0 45 90 MACEDONIA FORMER YUGOSLAV GREECE km 111 Important Bird Areas in Europe – Bulgaria Table 1. -
Other Europe in the Middle Ages : Avars, Bulgars, Khazars, and Cumans
Th e Other Europe in the Middle Ages curta_f1_i-x.indd i 10/30/2007 7:02:55 PM East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450 General Editor Florin Curta VOLUME 2 curta_f1_i-x.indd ii 10/30/2007 7:02:57 PM Th e Other Europe in the Middle Ages Avars, Bulgars, Khazars, and Cumans Edited by Florin Curta with the assistance of Roman Kovalev LEIDEN • BOSTON 2008 curta_f1_i-x.indd iii 10/30/2007 7:02:57 PM Cover illustration: A mask-on-horse pendant from Vratsa. Courtesy of the History Museum in Vratsa. Th is book is printed on acid-free paper. A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISSN 1872-8103 ISBN 978 90 04 16389 8 Copyright 2008 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, Th e Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechani- cal, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to Th e Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands curta_f1_i-x.indd iv 10/30/2007 7:02:57 PM To the memory of Petre Diaconu (1924–2007) curta_f1_i-x.indd v 10/30/2007 7:02:57 PM curta_f1_i-x.indd vi 10/30/2007 7:02:57 PM CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................................. -
Annexes, Huge Residen Al Building) Very Atypical for the Rhine Selected: Yes | Criteria: 2, 3 Fron Er
Draft Statement OUV & Comparative Analysis World Heritage Nomination Lower German Limes Final version 2.0 July 15, 2014 Company Leiden University Date July 15, 2014 Authors Professor Dr. W.J.H. Willems drs. E. Graafstal dr. C. van Driel-Murray Commissioned Provincie Gelderland by Provincie Utrecht Provincie Zuid-Holland Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed Table of Contents Dutch Summary………………………………………………………………….....2 1. Statement OUV………………………………………………………………...3 A Very Brief Synthesis………………………………………………………...3 The Outstanding Universal Value……………………………………………...4 Integrity and Authenticity……………………………………………….......…5 2. Comparative Analysis………………………………………………………….9 General Description…………………………………………………….………9 Key Features and Values………………………………………….………….13 Comparison and Discussion……………………………………………….…17 3. Boundaries and Selection Criteria…………………………………………...21 Selection criteria for properties to be included as component parts in the nomination …………………………………………………………………..21 Logical principles for the buffer zone……………………………………….24 Appendix I………………………………………………………………….….…26 1 Dutch Summary Bij de Werelderfgoednominatie Romeinse Limes dient inzichtelijk gemaakt te worden wat de uitzonderlijke universele waarde van de Limes is, hoe het staat met de authenticiteit en integriteit van het voorgedragen erfgoed en hoe de Limes zich verhoudt tot vergelijkbaar erfgoed. Hiertoe is dit document opgesteld. Uitzonderlijke Universele Waarde (OUV) en Comparatieve Analyse De nominatie heeft betrekking op de Nedergermaanse Limes (Lower German Limes, LGL). Deze loopt van Katwijk aan Zee in Nederland tot Remagen in Duitsland. De OUV van de Romeinse Limes laat zich als volgt samenvatten: De Romeinse Limes in Nederland beslaat de hele periode van het Romeinse Keizerrijk. Alle fasen zijn vertegenwoordigd: van de verovering tot het uiteenvallen van het Rijk. Hierin is het Nederlandse deel van de Romeinse Limes bijzonder; nergens anders is de Limes zo lang onafgebroken in gebruik geweest. -
English, French, German, Greek and Italian)
Approved: By the Minister of Environment and Water- Ms. Evdokia Maneva Implementation of the Ramsar Convention in general, and of the Ramsar Strategic Plan 1997-2002 in particular, during the period since the National Report prepared in 1995 for Ramsar COP6 and 30 June 1998 Contracting Party: Bulgaria Designated Ramsar Administrative Authority Full name of the institution: Ministry of Environment and Waters Name and title of the head of the institution: Ms. Evdokia Maneva - a Minister Mailing address for the head of the institution: 1000 Sofia, 67 William Gladstone Str. Bulgaria Telephone: +359 2 88 25 77 Fax: +359 2 80 32 24 E-mail: Name and title (if different) of the designated contact officer for Ramsar Convention matters: Mr. Ljubo Profirov - regional coordinator of Burgas Wetlands Project -temporary Mr. Valeri Georgiev - expert of protected fauna Mailing address (if different) for the designated contact officer: The address is the same Telephone: +359 2 84 72 23 79 Fax: + 359 2 52 16 34 Email: [email protected] Ramsar Strategic Plan - General Objective 1 To progress towards universal membership of the Convention. 1.1 Describe any actions your government has taken (such as hosting regional or subregional meetings/consultations, working co-operatively with neighbouring countries on transfrontier wetland sites) to encourage others to join the Convention. Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds (BSPB), Ministry of Environment and Waters (MoEW) and Bulgarian-Swiss Biodiversity Conservation Programme (BSBCP) have been organizers of the Third Geese Research Group meeting of Wetlands International, Kavarna, February 1998. Bulgaria has been invited to participate the First Mediterranean Wetland Committee meeting as a country of the Mediterranean basin, Thessaloniki, Greece, March 1998. -
Expected Social and Economic Consequences
EXPECTED SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES FROM WETLAND RESTORATION IN THE AREA OF KALIMOK AND BRUSHLEN MARSHES, BULGARIA / Report on Item 5 of the Terms of Reference under Project Agreement between Green Balkans and WWF Greece, 2000 / ® Produced by Green Balkans, march, 2001 WWF With the financial support of WWF-Greece GREECE CONTENTS 1. Introduction page 2 2. Methodology page 4 3. Analysis on land use, land ownership, and the expected social and economic consequences from alternative wetland restoration options page 7 3.1. Land use page 7 3.2. Land ownership page 7 3.3. Feasibility of the alternative wetland restoration options page 8 3.4. Expected social and economic consequences page 10 4. Recommendations on mitigation measures page 12 5. Recommendations on stakeholder participation – consultation schemes page 13 6. List of appendices page 16 EXPECTED SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES FROM WETLAND RESTORATION IN THE AREA OF KALIMOK AND BRUSHLEN MARSHES, BULGARIA (Report on Item 5 of the Terms of Reference under Project Agreement between Green Balkans and WWF - Greece, 2000) 1. INTRODUCTION Kalimok and Brushlen Marshes, situated in the Danube Plain near the town of Tutrakan, serve as an example for the fate of wetlands over the previous century. Prior to the spring of 1948, during the spring high waters, the lowlands along the riverbanks used to be entirely flooded. The withdrawal of waters left huge marshy areas, similar to Tutrakan and Brushlen Marshes. The wetlands – permanent marshes and periodically flooded areas – used to cover about 11 000 ha. The whole area was used mainly for fishing and livestock breeding.