Data Extraction Form

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Data Extraction Form

Data extraction form (based on a form developed by Sally Hollis and Tina Leonard, Cochrane Skin Group)

Reviewer: Study ID: Lead author: Publication date:

Study design

Design: parallel group cross over other (describe)

Method of allocation concealment: You may choose to use the Jadad Score or you may prefer to only use the Risk of Bias table now available in RevMan 5

Grade: (for Table of Included Studies) A B C D

A is adequate (third party, opaque sealed envelopes) B is unclear what process used C is inadequate (day of the week, alternate) D was not undertaken

Randomisation: Study described as randomised? yes / no Jadad score 1 / 0

Information provided on how randomisation sequence was generated? yes / no

Was the process of randomisation appropriate? yes / no Jadad score +1 / -1

Blinding Trial described as: single blind double blind triple blind open label Not described Jadad score 1 / 0 (double blind only) Who was blinded?

Participant: yes / unclear / no Clinician yes / unclear / no Outcome assessor yes / unclear / no

Was blinding appropriate/effective ? yes / no Jadad score +1 / -1

Risk of Bias Adequate sequence generation:

Allocation concealment:

Blinding:

Incomplete outcome data:

Free of Selective reporting:

Free of other Bias:

Participants

Setting: Inpatient / outpatient / hospital at home / Other (describe)

What were the criteria for patients to join the trial? Describe. Age?

Diagnosis:

Any neuropathic pain / postherpetic neuralgia / diabetic neuropathy / central pain: post stroke pain / spinal cord injury pain trigeminal neuralgia / atypical facial pain

Duration of symptoms?

Other?

1 1 Intervention 1 Intervention 2 Intervention 3 Total Number of patients randomised

Age range:

Mean age (S.D):

Gender No. male No. female

Pain / disease severity / duration of disease

Other issues? Were all treatment groups comparable at baseline? yes / no / unsure

Baseline pain assessment? yes / no / unsure

Withdrawals and dropouts:

'Intention to treat' Analysis ie: analysis of ALL patients randomised yes / not stated / no

Intervention 1 Intervention 2 Intervention 3 Total Number of withdrawals Reason for withdrawal Number lost to follow up Final number of patients evaluable Jadad score + 1 / 0

Summary: Minimal missing outcome data / ITT unclear? / Substantial missing outcome data

TOTAL JADAD SCORE:

2 2 Description of interventions Intervention 1:

Drug

Dose

Route of administration

Duration of treatment

Follow-up

Other

Intervention 2:

Drug

Dose

Route of administration

Duration of treatment

Follow-up

Other

Intervention 3:

Drug

Dose

Route of administration

Duration of treatment

Follow-up

Other

3 3 Outcomes

All data are number of patients, NOT percentages Intervention 1 Intervention 2 Intervention 3 Baseline End point Baseline End point Baseline Endpoint

Global improvement (measured by

Pain relief (measured by

Depression (measured by

Sleep parameters (measured by

Adverse effects Major (withdrawal from study)

Adverse effects Dry mouth Dry mouth Dry mouth Drowsiness/fatigue Drowsiness/fatigue Drowsiness/fatigue Minor Constipation Constipation Constipation Increased spasticity Increased spasticity Increased spasticity Urinary retention Urinary retention Urinary retention Sweating Sweating Sweating Headache Headache Headache Diarrhea Diarrhea Diarrhea Palpitations Palpitations Palpitations Irritability Irritability Irritability Blurred vision Blurred vision Blurred vision Dizziness/lightheadedness Dizziness/lightheadedness Dizziness/lightheadedness Nausea/vomiting Nausea/vomiting Nausea/vomiting Other Other Other

Assessment of compliance undertaken? yes / not stated / no Method:

Comments:

Date form completed:

4 4

Recommended publications