DOCSLIB.ORG

Research Report 67 a Practical Guide to Reservoir Management Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research Report 67 a Practical Guide to Reservoir Management Final Water Quality Research Australia Membership at December 2008 Industry Members • Australian Water Association Ltd • Degrémont Pty Ltd • Barwon Region Water Corporation “Barwon Water” • Central Highlands Water • City West Water Ltd • Coliban Region Water Corporation • Department of Human Services (Vic) • Goulburn Valley Regional Water Corporation A Practical Guide “Goulburn Valley Water” • Grampians Wimmera Mallee Water Corporation • Hunter Water Corporation to Reservoir Water Quality Research Australia Limited • Melbourne Water Corporation GPO BOX 1751, Adelaide SA 5001 • Power & Water Corporation • South East Water Limited For more information about WQRA visit the website Management • Sydney Catchment Authority www.wqra.com.au • Sydney Water Corporation • United Water International Pty Ltd • Wannon Region Water Corporation • Water Corporation of WA • Yarra Valley Water Ltd Research Report 67 • South Australian Water Corporation • Central Gippsland Regional Water Corporation Research Members • Australian Water Quality Centre • Centre for Appropriate Technology • Curtin University of Technology • Flinders University • Griffith University • Monash University • RMIT University • University of Adelaide • University of NSW • The University of Queensland • University of South Australia • University of Technology, Sydney • University of Wollongong, Faculty of Engineering, The Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Water Quality and • Victoria University Treatment operated for 13 years as Australia’s national drinking water research centre. It was established and supported under the General Members Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program. • Cradle Coast Water • Department of Water (WA) The CRC for Water Quality and Treatment officially ended in October 2008, and has been succeeded by Water Quality • Esk Water Authority Research Australia Limited (WQRA), a company funded by the • Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation Australian water industry. WQRA will undertake collaborative “LMW” research of national application on drinking water quality, recycled Research Report • NSW Water Solutions, Commerce water and relevant areas of wastewater management. • NSW Department of Health • Orica Australia Pty Ltd The research in this document was conducted during the term of the CRC for Water Quality and Treatment and the final report completed under the auspices of WQRA. 67 A Practical Guide to Reservoir Management Contributing Authors, Justin Brookes1, Mike Burch2, Matthew Hipsey3, Leon Linden1, Jason Antenucci3, Dennis Steffensen2, Peter Hobson2, Olivia Thorne4, David Lewis1, Stephanie Rinck-Pfeiffer5, Uwe Kaeding5, Paul Ramussen5 1 The University of Adelaide 2 The Australian Water Quality Centre 3 The Centre for Water Research, UWA 4 The University of Cambridge 5 United Water International Research Report No 67 A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT DISCLAIMER The Cooperative Research Centre for Water Quality and Treatment officially ended October 2008, and has been succeeded by Water Quality Research Australia Limited (WQRA), a company funded by the Australian water industry. WQRA and individual contributors are not responsible for the outcomes of any actions taken on the basis of information in this research report, nor for any errors and omissions. WQRA and individual contributors disclaim all and any liability to any person in respect of anything, and the consequences of anything, done or omitted to be done by a person in reliance upon the whole or any part of this research report. This research report does not purport to be a comprehensive statement and analysis of its subject matter, and if further expert advice is required the services of a competent professional should be sought. © Water Quality Research Australia Limited 2008 Location: WQRA Head Office Level 3, 250 Victoria Square, Adelaide SA 5000 Postal Address: GPO BOX 1751, Adelaide SA 5001 For more information about WQRA visit the website www.wqra.com.au A Practical Guide to Reservoir Management Research Report 67 ISBN 18766 16938 2 CRC FOR WATER QUALITY AND TREATMENT – RESEARCH REPORT 67 FOREWORD Research Report Title: A Practical Guide to Reservoir Management Contributing authors: Justin Brookes1, Mike Burch2, Matthew Hipsey3, Leon Linden1, Jason Antenucci3, Dennis Steffensen2, Peter Hobson2, Olivia Thorne4, David Lewis1, Stephanie Rinck-Pfeiffer5, Uwe Kaeding5, Paul Ramussen5 Project Leader: Justin Brookes Research Nodes: 1The University of Adelaide 2The Australian Water Quality Centre 3The Centre for Water Research, UWA 4The University of Cambridge 5United Water International CRC for Water Quality and Treatment Project No. 2.2.2.3 – Integrated models and guidance manuals for reservoir management 3 A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarises a range of studies and consolidated practical knowledge related to reservoir management in the Australian context, which also have wider international application. The guide provides an overview of processes that impact upon drinking water quality in reservoirs and also a range of selected procedures and tools for reservoir management. This is supported by a series of case study investigations that were largely carried out within the Source Water Program of the CRC for Water Quality & Treatment. The first section of this guide deals with reservoir monitoring and modeling with discussion about the application of hydrodynamic models in reservoir management. It is followed by sections on catchment- derived contaminants, including description and case studies of the use of a simple model to assess contaminant transport, such as pathogens in reservoir inflows. The guide outlines the importance of natural organic matter dynamics and transformations in reservoirs. Subsequent sections address reservoir-derived contaminants such as cyanobacteria and iron and manganese and provide a case study of the use and importance of variable depth reservoir offtakes to optimise withdrawal of the best quality water. The guide includes discussion of managing the impacts of wildfire on water quality and has an overview of the emerging area of climate change and reservoir management. Reservoir management should be considered in the context of the Framework for Management of Drinking Water Quality contained in Chapter 2 of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG), (http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/_files/adwg_11_06_chapter_2.pdf). This Framework offers effective means of assuring drinking water quality and the protection of public health through adoption of a preventive management approach that encompasses all steps in water production from catchment to consumer. When using the Framework there are a number of elements that need to be considered in relation to reservoir management including: assessment of the role and importance of the reservoir in the context of the overall supply system; identification of preventive measures available for water quality management in the reservoir; and the identification of operational and process controls available. It is important to note that reservoirs can form one of the important barriers to contamination in this preventive strategy from ‘catchment to tap’, however they can also be a source of water quality deterioration. The first step in the development of a reservoir management plan using this key element approach should be to consider the potential hazards from catchment activities and the circumstances under which these will develop as risks to water quality. This risk assessment not only informs the reservoir management plan but may also reveal opportunities for managing contaminants at the source. The most common contaminants of concern generated from catchments are pathogens, particulates and natural organic matter but in some cases industrial and agricultural chemicals may also be important. High rainfall and associated inflows represent the major risk period to deliver these contaminants. During storage of water in the reservoir a number of beneficial water quality changes can occur. Reduced water movement increases the rate of sedimentation of particulates. This reduces turbidity and may also result in the sequestering of the contaminants associated with the particles. Many of the pathogens of concern are attenuated by environmental conditions with temperature and UV being the most critical factors. They may also be consumed by grazers. Chemical contaminants may be subject to beneficial transformations that can de-toxify them. Understanding these mechanisms is critical to the understanding of the effectiveness of reservoirs as barriers to contamination. Of particular importance is a good knowledge of the hydrodynamic processes that control water movement in the reservoir as this will determine the length of time the water is retained and the environmental conditions that it will be subjected to. Issues such as the thermal stratification and the short-circuiting of inflows can have significant impacts. Reservoirs may also be sources of contamination. Contaminants sequestered in the sediments can be resuspended during periods of high flow and bound contaminants may be released if the water chemistry changes. Contaminants that are important in this regard include iron, manganese and nutrients that can be released from sediments under anoxic conditions. Biological growths in the reservoir may also impair water quality and of particular concern is the growth of cyanobacteria which can produce toxins and off-flavours. 4 CRC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REVIEW of the ACT WATER RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES 2013 November 2017 Final Report to Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate
    REVIEW OF THE ACT WATER RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES 2013 November 2017 Final Report to Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate. APPLIEDECOLOGY.EDU.AU ACT ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES: REVIEW Prepared for: Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government Produced by: Institute for Applied Ecology appliedecology.edu.au University of Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6201 2795 Facsimile: (02) 6201 5651 Authors: Dr. Adrian Dusting, Mr. Ben Broadhurst, Dr. Sue Nichols, Dr. Fiona Dyer This report should be cited as: Dusting,A., Broadhurst, B., Nichols, S. and Dyer, F. (2017) Review of the ACT Water Resources Environmental Flow Guidelines 2013. Final report to EPSDD, ACT Government. Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra. Inquiries regarding this document should be addressed to: Dr. Fiona Dyer Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Canberra 2601 Telephone: (02) 6201 2452 Facsimile: (02) 6201 5651 Email: [email protected] Document history and status Version Date Issued Reviewed by Approved by Revision Type Draft 07/08/2017 IAE EFG review Adrian Dusting Internal team Final 11/08/2017 Adrian Dusting Fiona Dyer Internal Final - revised 15/11/2017 ACT Gov. steering Adrian Dusting External committee, EFTAG, MDBA Front cover photo: Cotter River at Top Flats. Photo by Fiona Dyer APPLIEDECOLOGY.EDU.AU ii ACT ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW GUIDELINES: REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................... vii Background and
    [Show full text]
  • Central Region
    Section 3 Central Region 49 3.1 Central Region overview .................................................................................................... 51 3.2 Yarra system ....................................................................................................................... 53 3.3 Tarago system .................................................................................................................... 58 3.4 Maribyrnong system .......................................................................................................... 62 3.5 Werribee system ................................................................................................................. 66 3.6 Moorabool system .............................................................................................................. 72 3.7 Barwon system ................................................................................................................... 77 3.7.1 Upper Barwon River ............................................................................................... 77 3.7.2 Lower Barwon wetlands ........................................................................................ 77 50 3.1 Central Region overview 3.1 Central Region overview There are six systems that can receive environmental water in the Central Region: the Yarra and Tarago systems in the east and the Werribee, Maribyrnong, Moorabool and Barwon systems in the west. The landscape Community considerations The Yarra River flows west from the Yarra Ranges
    [Show full text]
  • Water Security for the ACT and Region
    Water Security for the ACT and Region Recommendations to ACT Government July 2007 © ACTEW Corporation Ltd This publication is copyright and contains information that is the property of ACTEW Corporation Ltd. It may be reproduced for the purposes of use while engaged on ACTEW commissioned projects, but is not to be communicated in whole or in part to any third party without prior written consent. Water Security Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this report 1 1.2 Setting the Scene 1 1.3 A Fundamental Change in Assumptions 3 1.4 Water Management in the ACT 6 2 Future Water Options 8 2.1 Reliance on Catchment Inflows 8 2.2 Seawater Source 12 2.3 Groundwater 13 2.4 Water Purification Scheme 13 2.5 Stormwater Use 14 2.6 Rainwater Tanks 15 2.7 Greywater Use 16 2.8 Other non potable reuse options – large scale irrigation 16 2.9 Accelerated Demand Management 17 2.10 Cloud Seeding 18 2.11 Watermining TM 19 2.12 Evaporation Control on Reservoirs 19 2.13 Preferred Options 19 3 Cotter Dam Enlargement 20 3.1 Description of Proposal 20 3.2 Description and History of the Area 20 3.3 Existing Water Storages in the Cotter Catchment 21 3.4 Planning, Environment and Heritage Considerations 22 3.5 Proposed Enlarged Cotter Dam and Associated Infrastructure 23 3.6 Cost Estimate 23 4 Water Purification Scheme 24 4.1 Description of Proposal 24 4.2 Water Purification Plant 24 4.3 Commissioning Phase 28 4.4 Brine Management and Disposal 29 4.5 Energy 29 4.6 Cost Estimates 29 Document No: 314429 - Water security for the
    [Show full text]
  • Downstream Movement of Fish in the Australian Capital Territory
    Downstream movement of fish in the Australian Capital Territory Mark Lintermans - Environment ACT Geographic Context (> ~100 mm), so any movement by smaller species was undetected. Fish tagged at the Casuarina Sands fishway have been captured in The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) lies Lake Burrinjuck, approximately 40 km entirely within a single river catchment (the downstream (Lintermans unpublished data). upper Murrumbidgee) within the Murray- Darling Basin. The ACT covers 2,400 km2 with about 60% of the Territory being hilly or Other research projects have encountered mountainous, and no lowland or floodplain downstream movement, but were not rivers are present (Anon 1998 ). Altitude in the specifically designed to investigate this ACT ranges from approximately 440 to 1911 m. phenomenon. For example, monitoring of the ASL. The fish diversity is low with only fish community in the Molonglo River 11 native species and nine alien species downstream of Lake Burley Griffin found that recorded. Due to its inland and upland location, the ages of the majority of Golden Perch present there are no diadromous fish species occurring corresponded with the ages of stocked fish in the naturally in the ACT (Lintermans 2000; lake upstream, suggesting that the golden perch Lintermans & Osborne 2002). population in the rivers was largely derived from downstream displacement of fish from the lake (Lintermans 1997, 1998b). Similarly monitoring State Policies in the Cotter River has recorded downstream displacement of Macquarie perch and Trout cod from Bendora Dam, a drop of 45 m onto a There is no formal policy for downstream fish concrete apron, with individuals of both species movement in the ACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Notifiable Instrument NI2012–248
    Australian Capital Territory Planning and Development (Environmental Significance Opinion - Block 18 District of Cotter River, Bendora Gravity Main 6 Mile ASCV) Notice 2012 (No 1) Notifiable instrument NI2012–248 Made under the Planning and Development Act 2007 s 138AD (Requirements in relation to environmental significance opinions) 1 Name of instrument This instrument is the Planning and Development (Environmental Significance Opinion - Block 18 District of Cotter River, Bendora Gravity Main 6 Mile ASCV) Notice 2012 (No 1). 2 Commencement This instrument commences on the day after notification. 3 Environmental Significance Opinion An Environmental Significance Opinion has been prepared by the Conservator of Flora and Fauna. The text of the opinion is shown at Annexure A. A copy of the opinion may be obtained from ACTPLA’s website: http://www.actpla.act.gov.au/topics/design_build/da_assessment/environmenta l_significance_opinions 4 Completion The environmental significance opinion and the notice including the text of the opinion expire 18 months after the day the notice is notified. David Papps Planning and Land Authority 11 May 2012 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au ~ _I!C_rnm!_t _ 'el Environment and Sustainable Development Mr David Papps Chief Planning Executive ACT Planning and Land Authority Dame Pattie Menzies Building DICKSON ACT 2602 DearMrt f}qu,J . This is to advise of my decision, under s.138AB(4) ofthe Planning and Development Act 2007, on the request for an environmental significance opinion for the proposed installation of a 12.0m high galvanised steel pole with a small solar panel and antenna, and associated works, within Block 18 District of Cotter River for the purpose of providing telemetry feedback from the Bendora 6 Mile ASCV for remote monitoring, in an area of national park.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Water Charges Information Paper
    SUBMISSION 39 APPENDIX 1 RECEIVED 28/09/2017 Environmental Water Charges Information Paper DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, LAND, WATER AND PLANNING, VICTORIAN STATE GOVERNMENT AUGUST 2017 Note to Readers This Information Paper is prepared for the purpose of informing the discussion on environmental water charges with key organisations directly or potentially involved in either owning, managing or charging for environmental water in Victoria. It is written for an audience with some knowledge of these matters. This Information Paper was prepared based on information readily available and if there are any inaccuracies or perceptions of inaccuracy then the author will be pleased to discuss these as part of the consultative process. Consequently, the contents are not available for citation. The copyright to this document and release of any of its contents is owned by the Department of Environment Land Water and Planning and the author, Hunter H2O. The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the Department and Victorian Environmental Water Holder for making available their diagrams and pictures for use throughout this document. All photos in this report, including the cover, have been provided by Dr Fiona Spruzen (DELWP) Environmental Water Charges Information Paper Environmental Water Charges Information Paper, August 2017 Overview The purpose of this Information Paper is to describe the historical development and basis for current charging for environmental water in Victoria as it exists in August 2017. The Information Paper starts by illustrating and describing a historical roadmap to the key topics behind the origin and further development of environmental water charges in Victoria. It is an overlapping story that requires unbundling to gain a proper understanding of the current issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Environmental Flow Guidelines 2019 (No 2)
    Australian Capital Territory Water Resources Environmental Flow Guidelines 2019 (No 2) Disallowable instrument DI2019—190 made under the Water Resources Act 2007, s 12 (Environmental flow guidelines) 1 Name of instrument This instrument is the Water Resources Environmental Flow Guidelines 2019 (No 2). 2 Commencement This instrument commences on the day after its notification day. 3 Determination of environmental flow guidelines I approve the environmental flow guidelines in schedule 1. 4 Revocation This instrument revokes the Water Resources Environmental Flow Guidelines 2019 (DI2019-37). Mick Gentleman MLA Minister for the Environment and Heritage 24 July 2019 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au Schedule 1 (see cl 3) ACT WATER RESOURCES Environmental Flow Guidelines - 2019 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 5 Purpose of environmental flows ............................................................................................ 5 Components of environmental flows ..................................................................................... 5 How environmental flows are provided ................................................................................. 6 Ecological objectives for environmental flows ....................................................................... 6 Environmental flows in water supply catchments ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Watering Plan 2014-15 Collaboration Integrity Commitment Initiative
    Victorian Environmental Water Holder Seasonal Watering Plan 2014-15 collaboration integrity commitment initiative © Victorian Environmental Water Holder 2014 Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution alternative format, please contact the Victorian 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under Environmental Water Holder on (03) 9637 8951 or email that licence, on the condition that you credit the Victorian [email protected]. This document is also Environmental Water Holder as author. The licence does not available on the internet at www.vewh.vic.gov.au apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Government logo and the Victorian Environmental Acknowledgment of Country Water Holder logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Victorian Environmental Water Holder acknowledges http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Aboriginal Traditional Owners within Victoria, their rich culture and their spiritual connection to Country. The Printed by Impact Digital, Brunswick (June 2014) contribution and interests of Aboriginal People and organisations in the management of land and natural ISSN: 2203-6539 (Print) resources is also recognised and acknowledged. ISSN: 2203-6520 (Online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the Victorian Environmental Water Holder and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Preliminary Business Case Summary Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning
    Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Preliminary Business Case Summary Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer 2 Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Introduction During the Millennium Pipeline to provide water security The key questions asked in the Drought, Victoria made to towns and communities in both preliminary business case were: large investments in the directions. The work has shown that it is technically feasible to • What infrastructure is required state’s water security. The pump water north with additional for bi-directional pumping and Victorian Desalination works to existing infrastructure. It is it technically feasible? Project was commissioned, would require additional capital • How much water can be investment and it is an option that $1 billion dollars was pumped from the Melbourne government will continue to invested in upgrading the system to the Goulburn River? explore. Goulburn-Murray Irrigation • When can water be transferred District, and the water grid The primary benefits available by and where can it be used? was expanded, including sending water north through the building the Sugarloaf Sugarloaf Pipeline include: • Is the infrastructure financially viable? Pipeline. • supplying water to irrigators and private diverters to improve This document summarises the As a consequence of these agricultural productivity; key findings of the preliminary investments, the Victorian business case. Government has determined that • improving water security for up to an additional 75 gigalitres rural towns and urban centres (GL) per year be available for use connected to the water grid; in northern Victoria. This will support industry and farmers, • making water available to be particularly during dry conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Annual Report
    Water Quality Annual Report 2016-17 Melbourne Water Doc ID. 39900111 Melbourne Water is owned by the Victorian Government. We manage Melbourne’s water supply catchments, remove and treat most of Melbourne’s sewage, and manage rivers and creeks and major drainage systems throughout the Port Phillip and Westernport region. Table of contents Water supply system .................................................................................................. 3 Source water .............................................................................................................. 4 Improvement initiatives ............................................................................................. 7 Drinking water treatment processes .......................................................................... 8 Issues ...................................................................................................................... 16 Emergency, incident and event management ........................................................... 16 Risk management plan audit results ........................................................................ 17 Exemptions under Section 8 of the Act ..................................................................... 17 Undertakings under Section 30 of the Act ................................................................ 17 Further information .................................................................................................. 17 2 Water Quality Annual Report | 2016-17 This report is
    [Show full text]
  • 03-Tarago-Bunyip-Flow-Recs-Revc
    FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW DETERMINATION FOR THE TARAGO AND BUNYIP RIVERS Bunyip and Tarago Rivers Environmental Flow Determination – Flow Recommendations Paper Environmental Flow Determination for the Tarago and Bunyip Rivers FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS PAPER L:\work\NRG\PROJECTS\2006\061 Tarago Bunyip FLOWS\02\03 Recs Paper\Tarago-Bunyip Flow Recs RevB - High Quality.doc Document History: REVISION ISSUE DATE AUTHOR CHECKED REVIEW ONE REVIEW TWO NUMBER 06/11/06 --- L. Pope L. Roach C. Arnott --- 28/02/07 B L. Pope L. Roach S. Lake L. Roach 12/04/07 C L. Pope L. Roach Environment Group Earth Tech Engineering Pty Ltd ABN 61 089 482 888 Head Office 71 Queens Road Melbourne VIC 3004 Tel +61 3 8517 9200 Bunyip and Tarago Rivers Environmental Flow Determination – Flow Recommendations Paper The Bunyip and Tarago Rivers Environmental Water Requirements Technical Panel (the Technical Panel) consists of (in alphabetical order, with fields of expertise): Nick Bond Fish Ecology Tim Doeg Macroinvertebrate Ecology and Water Quality James Kaye Vegetation Ross Hardie Geomorphology John Sherwood Estuary Geoff Vietz Hydrology and Hydraulics The project management team consists of: Chris Arnott Technical Reviewer and Advisory Group Facilitator Lisa Roach Project Manager Lizzie Pope Project Support The Steering Committee for the project consists of: Christine Hughes Melbourne Water Project Manager Phil Mitchell Department of Sustainability and Environment Lizzy Skinner Melbourne Water Roy White Gippsland Water Penny Winbanks Southern Rural Water The
    [Show full text]
  • Better Water Resources Forecasts for Melbourne
    Better water resources CASE STUDY forecasts for Melbourne The Bureau of Meteorology’s seasonal streamflow forecasts provide Melbourne Water with improved information to aid water resource management for Melbourne. These forecasts indicate the likely volume of catchment inflows into the city’s major water supply reservoirs for the next three months. Collaboration between the two organisations has led Testing the forecast accuracy to the continued development of seasonal streamflow Together, the Bureau and Melbourne Water evaluated forecasts for Melbourne Water, offered insight for the the accuracy of monthly forecasts at five major inflow Bureau on how the forecasts can support decision- locations for Melbourne’s four major reservoirs— making within the water industry, and enabled better Maroondah, O’Shannassy, Upper Yarra and Thomson— communication on forecast performance. comparing the Bureau’s forecasting model output to the use of historical streamflow records (or climatology) Forecasting to improve Melbourne’s water for forecasting inflows for each location and season. resource management The Bureau’s model produced better forecasts than Severity of the 1997–2009 Millennium Drought— the information previously available. For each outlook, combined with projected impacts due to a changing the number of times the forecast matched what and variable climate, population growth and urban was observed (also called the ‘tercile hit rate’) was development—posed challenges to Melbourne’s water substantially higher using the Bureau’s model, than
    [Show full text]