Program Review Feedback Form: Vietnamese

Evergreen Valley College Program Review Feedback Form: Vietnamese

Date: 4/22/09 Reviewed by: Vietnamese

SUMMARY OF THE DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM Did the Review Team clearly articulate summary? If not, provide concrete feedback on information needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMT EXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT Did the Review Team clearly identify and assess strength and areas of improvements in relevant areas? Were there action plans included that would address areas of improvement? If not, provide concrete feedback on information needed in specific section. Areas of improvement not mentioned.(wei) FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT PART A: Overview of Program Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? If not, identify additional information needed. Part A6: Further explanation of results and what results mean. Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? If not, identify areas and information needed. Part A4 indicates a need for budgeted activities to enhance students’ global awareness, which isn’t quantified in later sections of the report. Part A4 also indicates a possible need for additional faculty, but these conditions are not fully quantified in Part F of the report. #4: It makes sense to start developing courses for the Native speakers of Vietnamese. Excited to see this plan included. #6: Both VIET 001 and 091 level has high enrollment of the Vietnamese students. We may want to research their educational goals in taking Vietnamese classes. Such information may help us focus on the way in which we recruit students and how we offer our courses. Please include your brief anlaysis/findings of the data in #6 (kuni) Very similar to Spanish/Language Arts, however; worked with counselors to support program success rate 8.9 well documented. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORM TEXT FORMTEXT

PART B: CURRICULUM Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? If not, identify additional information needed. FORMTEXT Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FO RMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT 1

Vietnamese Program Review Feedback 4_22_09 VP Academic Affairs Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? If not, identify areas and information needed. Tentative Curriculum Schedule to visit Mission College to observe Viet 20A and Viet 20B in F 2010. Is additional funding require for this activity? “ How did the innovative pedagogy impact student learning & success”. Well set out plan for Vietnamese 20 and 20B

PART C: STUDENT OUTCOMES Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? If not, identify additional information needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMT EXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. #1. Please provide links to the course outlines. (kuni) Suggest to provide copies of the link for SLO’s All courses have SLO’s. But no program SLO’s mentioned. (wei) Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? If not, identify areas and information needed. No areas mentioned. (wei) PART D: FACULTY AND STAFF Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? If not, identify additional information needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMT EXT Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT F ORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? If not, identify areas and information needed. Part D1 indicates a possible need for hiring additional faculty, but these conditions are not fully quantified in Part F of the report. . Not sure why FA tenure process was includ ed. FORMTEXT It’s mentioned that the “current classroom locations limits maximum usage of technology” . But no plan to address this concern. (wei) Might want to list Vietnamese adjunct faculty.

PART E: FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND MAINTENANCE Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? If not, identify additional information needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. FORMTEXT Need a Language Lab but no enrollment me ntioned. (wei) FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT

Vietnamese Program Review Feedback 4_22_09 VP Academic Affairs FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? If not, identify areas and information needed. How do we address the issue that’s been raised above: classroom location limits technology usage? (wei) PART F: FUTURE NEEDS Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? If not, identify additional information needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? If not, identify additional information and analysis needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT F ORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? If not, identify areas and information needed. Part F1 refers to an additional adjunct faculty member; how many classes would the adjunct teach? What enrollment conditions would necessitate this? What is the quantity of tutors needed? What is the quantity or ongoing budget allowance of books, software, videos, CDs needed? Does “more classroom space” for internet access mean that all classrooms should have one computer, or more? Will the planned improvements to Cedro be sufficient to meet this need? Does the request in Part F5 for 5 computers quantify the description of “classroom space” in Part F2? In Part F3, how many conferences/professional development activities should be budgeted? In Part F4, how many laptop computers, resources should be budgeted? Areas mentioned. But no action plan. Please explain why/how meeting the needs will enhance teaching & learning (wei) PART G: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Provide concrete questions or feedback if needed. FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTE XT FORMTEXT F ORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FO RMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT 3

Vietnamese Program Review Feedback 4_22_09 VP Academic Affairs FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT F ORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT FORMTEXT

Vietnamese Program Review Feedback 4_22_09 VP Academic Affairs