City of Blue Earth s8

1 CITY OF BLUE EARTH 2 MINUTES 3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4 Monday, August 16, 2010 – 5:00 P.M. 5 6 CALL TO ORDER 7 8Mayor Hammond called the meeting to order at 5:11 P.M. 9 10 ROLL CALL 11 12Roll call was taken: Councilmembers Brod, Huisman, Kelly, 13Gaylord, Wiborg and Mayor Hammond were present. Staff members 14present: City Administrator Kathy Bailey, City Attorney David 15Frundt and Assistant City Engineer Greg Mitchell. 16 17 DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM 18 19After roll call, Mayor Hammond determined there was a quorum. 20 21 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 22 23Mayor Hammond led the pledge of allegiance. 24 25 MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC 26 27Mayor Hammond noted that Bob and Jeff Moore were present to 28discuss their concerns of the North Main Street and Fairgrounds 29Sanitary Sewer Improvement. Hammond moved the discussion of the 30sanitary sewer line up in the agenda at this time. 31 32Jeff Moore provided a map of the location of the sanitary sewer 33service on North Main Street and in the Fairgrounds. Moore noted 34the location of the proposed sanitary sewer connections that will 35be provided to the businesses located on North Main Street and 36questioned why a connection is not being provided to Moore’s 37Drainage & Excavating in their right-of-way. 38 39City Administrator Kathy Bailey explained that the sanitary sewer 40manholes are located in the boulevards and discussed the platting 41behind M&H Trucking for future development of businesses. Bailey 42noted that the Moore and Devaraj properties are very similar in 43length for their connection to the sanitary sewer line. 44 45Bailey discussed that it is a shorter distance for the Moores to 46connect to the north by Ron’s Electric Service. This would make

1 1 1it necessary for the Moores to go under the Blue Earth River to 2make the connection. Mr. Moore informed the Council that it 3would require them to get a permit from the DNR to go under the 4river and added that a private citizen cannot accomplish this 5easily. Moore noted that the property behind M&H Trucking and 6Detke-Morbac is in a floodplain and shared that their lot would 7be more desirable for development. Moore discussed the 8discrepancy in how the landowners are being treated for their 9connection to the sanitary sewer. 10 11Councilmember Gaylord questioned why the City isn’t obligated to 12extend the sanitary sewer line along the road like they have done 13for everyone else. Councilmember Brod shared that he completely 14agreed with Gaylord. Moore stated that they would be more than 15willing to pay for the expense of connecting from the right-of- 16way to their building. 17 18Mayor Hammond questioned City Engineer Greg Mitchell if private 19citizens are allowed to go under the river for their connection. 20Mitchell responded that it’s typically sanitary sewer mains that 21are allowed to go under the river and shared that he would need 22to contact the DNR to inquire about their permitting process and 23annual fee. 24 25Councilmember Huisman questioned if all of the costs had been 26factored in for the permits in addition to the expense of going 27under the river to make the connection. Mitchell discussed past 28infrastructure projects in the area of North Main Street and 29shared that going under the river would be a shorter and easier 30route for the connection. Bailey stated that the right-of-way 31along North Main Street is full of demo materials and noted that 32it would be difficult to get the lines bored through that area. 33 34Councilmember Brod expressed his concern of how the Moores are 35being treated with regards to their sanitary sewer connection. 36Mayor Hammond stated that he was in agreement with what the 37Moores were saying and asked that the City Engineer revisit their 38connection to the sanitary sewer at the right-of-way. Huisman 39asked for more information on their connection to the south 40versus connecting to the north. Gaylord requested a cost 41comparison for connecting to the north and to the south. 42 43City Administrator Kathy Bailey questioned how the City would 44address the change to the Moore’s connection with the bid being 45accepted. City Engineer Greg Mitchell responded that it could be 46accomplished through a change order to the project.

1 2 1 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 4There was no public hearing at this time. 5 6 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7 8Motion by Councilmember Huisman, second by Councilmember Gaylord 9to approve the minutes from the Work Session and Regular Council 10meetings of Monday, July 19, 2010 and Monday, August 2, 2010 and 11the Continued Regular Council meeting of Monday, August 2 held on 12August 3, 2010. The motion was approved unanimously. 13 14 LICENSES AND PERMITS 15 16Mayor Hammond addressed the Peddler Permit application from 17Dakota Fine Foods to be allowed to go door to door selling steaks 18from their truck. 19 20City Administrator Kathy Bailey reported that a criminal and 21driving background check had been previously conducted on the 22applicant and it was found to contain no issues. Bailey shared 23that after checking with the Better Business Bureau it was 24discovered that Dakota Fine Foods has a rating of an F with 25twenty-one complaints that have been filed against the business. 26Bailey noted that three of the complaints remain unsolved. 27Bailey shared that this review meets the requirements to deny the 28applicant for a peddler’s permit in the City. 29 30Motion by Councilmember Huisman, second by Councilmember Gaylord 31to deny issuing a Peddler Permit to Dakota Fine Foods. The 32motion was approved unanimously. 33 34The Council further discussed the definitions of a Peddler, 35Solicitor and Transient Merchants permit. 36 37 CORRESPONDENCE 38 39Council offered no additional discussion to the following 40correspondence: 41

1 3 1 Faribault County Board of Commissioner’s Agenda 8/17/10. 2 Thank you from Faribault County Fairboard. 3 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS 5 6City Administrator Kathy Bailey addressed the agenda item of 7setting a hearing date for Nortech JOBZ. Bailey shared that in 82006 Nortech received JOBZ designation when they located their 9business in Blue Earth. Bailey explained that due to the economy 10and the lack of contracts Nortech has been unable to meet the 11number of employees (150) needed to maintain the on-going 12requirements of their JOBZ status. Bailey stated that when 13Nortech consolidated their Fairmont location with Blue Earth they 14were not allowed to count the employees that transferred as new 15hires. Bailey shared that they are currently maintaining the 16employment level of 75. 17 18Bailey discussed that as a result of a teleconference she recently 19had with Nortech representatives and the Minnesota Department of 20Employment and Economic Development, a compromise was made to 21amend Nortech’s JOBZ status. To balance out the lower number of 22employees the duration of Nortech’s JOBZ status has been shortened 23and will end April 2011 rather than on December 2012. 24 25Bailey shared that as part of the process of amending Nortech’s 26JOBZ a hearing must be conducted to adopt their amended closing 27date. Bailey asked for a motion to approve setting a hearing for 28September 7, 2010 at 5:05 p.m. 29 30Motion by Councilmember Gaylord, second by Councilmember Wiborg to 31set the hearing date for September 7, 2010 at 5:05 p.m. to adopt 32the amended closing date for Nortech’s JOBZ status. The motion 33was approved unanimously. 34 35 REPORTS FROM STAFF 36 37The 2009 Crime Stats and Police incident analysis report was 38provided for review. 39 40The Liquor Store sales report was provided for review. 41 42City Attorney 43Mayor Hammond moved the closed session discussion of land 44purchases and land valuation appeal to the end of the meeting. 45 46

1 4 1City Engineer 2Assistant City Engineer Greg Mitchell addressed the Agreement for 3Professional Services for the Tenth and Galbraith Streets 4Improvement – 2011. 5 6City Administrator Kathy Bailey discussed Mayor Hammond’s request 7on how phase two of the street improvement project fits into the 8budget prior to approving the agreement for engineering services. 9Bailey provided a spreadsheet on the current capital improvement 10projects that included the street improvement projects, Waste 11Water Treatment Plant improvement project and the North Main and 12Fairgrounds Sanitary Sewer improvement project. Bailey noted 13that the City recently bonded for the Eight/Moore Street and the 14Tenth/Moore Street projects in addition to receiving PFA funding 15for the Fourth Street project. Bailey noted that the 2009 levied 16amount of $164,800 for street improvements combined with the 17beginning fund balance of $325,121 totals $489,921. Bailey 18provided additional details on the street piece of the 2010 – 192018 budgets and noted that the property tax revenue shows an 20annual increase of 3% through 2018. Bailey discussed that the 21$1,830,512 in bond proceeds will balance the budget in 2010. 22 23Bailey discussed the sewer piece of the budget and shared that 24charges for services is anticipated to increase 3% per year. 25 26Bailey stated that the spreadsheet on the capital improvement 27projects will be a working document that will fluctuate and 28change as the exact numbers of the projects’ costs become 29available. 30 31Councilmember Kelly questioned if the recent unexpected expense 32of repairing the digester cover at the Wastewater Treatment Plant 33had been factored into the budget. Bailey responded that the 34cost of the improvements were not included at this time because 35the exact numbers were not available. Bailey added that the 36expense would also be factored out over fifteen years. 37 38Bailey concluded her report by discussing the storm water utility 39projects. Bailey noted that in 2010 the capital outlay is at 40$1,020,043.00 which includes the 4th Street project. Bailey 41discussed that the ending cash is in the negative through 2020. 42Bailey shared that the Council may want to consider adjusting the 43storm sewer charge in the future. 44 45Mayor Hammond requested future updates on the capital improvement 46projects as the numbers become available.

1 5 1Assistant City Engineer Greg Mitchell asked for authorization 2from the Council to proceed with the agreement for the 3preliminary and design phase services for the 10th & Galbraith 4Streets Improvement – 2011. (See attachment #1). 5 6Councilmember Brod asked for clarification of the proposed 10th 7and Galbraith Street improvements. Mitchell responded that Phase 81 of the street improvement includes Galbraith Street from 14th to 910th Street and one block of 10th Street from Galbraith to Moore 10Street. Brod noted that the Street Committee also requested 11information about improving Galbraith Street from 7th Street to 1210th Street. Brod shared that the reason this was discussed by 13the committee was due to the fact that a street will be wrecked 14during the street improvement project and they wanted to 15determine which street it would be. Brod voiced his concern 16about damaging additional streets. Mitchell discussed the steps 17that are taken to minimize damaging adjacent streets and gave 4th 18Street as an example on how the trucks are being allowed to haul 19only onto North Main and Nicollet Street. Mitchell stated that 20the UHD project is different in that they are hauling a lot of 21material in and out of the area. Mitchell added that there 22aren’t a lot of decent roads around the hospital which has 23created problems with the trucks hauling. 24 25Councilmember Wiborg questioned what will happen on the new 26portion of 8th Street when the second phase of Galbraith Street is 27started and the trucks are hauling up and down Galbraith Street. 28Bailey responded that it’s a 7 ton route and they would not be 29looking at hauling on that particular route. Councilmember Kelly 30commented that the trucks would be crossing 8th Street as they are 31driving south on Galbraith. Bailey shared that they are 32anticipating that trucks will be hauling up Galbraith from 14th 33Street. Kelly questioned the truck route during the time that 34Galbraith is being repaired from 10th to 14th Street. Brod 35questioned if trucks would be allowed to drive on Galbraith 36Street south of 10th Street when it is torn up. 37 38Councilmember Wiborg questioned if the City would be improving 39Galbraith Street from 10th up to 8th Street and noted that the 40intersection of 8th and Galbraith was recently improved. Bailey 41responded that the intersection has already been completed and 42the new pavement would be matched up to 8th Street on both sides 43of Galbraith Street. Wiborg questioned if heavy trucks would be 44allowed to drive over the intersection. Bailey replied that she 45is not sure how the phasing of the street improvement would work 46in that area. Mitchell discussed that the hospital’s delivery

1 6 1and MRI truck route is from 14th Street north on Galbraith Street 2and added that the construction process would follow the same 3route. 4 5Kelly questioned if the preliminary and design service of both 6phases would be included in the engineer’s estimated cost. 7Bailey responded that both phases are included in the total cost 8of the preparation of the preliminary and design phase services. 9Bailey discussed that the agreement for professional services 10includes Tenth Street from Moore Street to Ramsey Street, 11Eleventh Street from Galbraith Street to Ramsey Street and 12Galbraith Street from Seventh Street to Fourteenth Street. 13 14Mayor Hammond asked for a motion to approve the Agreement for 15Professional Services for Tenth & Galbraith Street Improvement – 162011 with Bolton & Menk, Inc. 17 18Motion by Councilmember Kelly, second by Councilmember Huisman to 19approve the Agreement for Professional Services for Tenth & 20Galbraith Streets Improvement – 2011 with Bolton & Menk, Inc. 21The motion was approved unanimously. 22 23Mitchell reported that seven bids were received for the North 24Main Street and Fairgrounds Sanitary Sewer Improvement project. 25(See attachment #2). Mitchell stated that Holtmeier Construction 26submitted the low bid of $276,366.75 which was $26,660.00 lower 27than the engineer’s estimate. Mitchell shared that Holtmeier 28Construction is the same contractor that is currently working on 29the 4th Street Improvement project. 30 31Councilmember Kelly questioned if there would be a change to the 32bid due to the possible change in the Moore’s connection to the 33sanitary sewer main. Mitchell responded that a change order 34process would be used if the cost is favorable. Mitchell noted 35that the only alternative would be to not accept the bid at this 36time and rebid the project. 37 38Motion by Councilmember Gaylord, second by Councilmember Kelly to 39approve the bid of $276,366.75 of Holtmeier Construction for the 40North Main Street and Fairgrounds Sanitary Sewer Improvement 41project. The motion was approved unanimously. 42 43Mitchell provided an update on the 4th Street Improvement project. 44Mitchell shared that the storm sewer and sanitary sewer are 45installed up to Nicollet Street and the water main has been 46installed up to Linton Street. Mitchell stated that a second

1 7 1crew has been brought in to assist with the project and noted 2that they are waiting for the water sample test results prior to 3completing the water hook ups. Mitchell discussed the condition 4of the existing storm sewer pipes which are creating a problem 5due to the fact that they are made of clay which are sections 6fitted together. Mitchell shared that once the contractor starts 7digging along the pipe and removing some of the support along the 8edge of it the storm sewer pipe collapses on itself. Mitchell 9added that the weather has also been unfavorable during the 10project. 11 12Mitchell reported that Ron Roetzel has had contact with FAA 13Program Manager Sandy DePotty and was informed that the airport 14funding process is still moving forward. 15 16 REPORTS FROM BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 17 18The minutes from the July 12, 2010 HRA Board meeting were 19provided for review. 20 21The minutes from the July 13, 2010 Senior Center Board meeting 22were provided for review. 23 24The minutes from the June 11, 2010 and July 9, 2010 EDA Board 25meeting were provided for review. 26 27Motion by Councilmember Huisman, second by Councilmember Gaylord 28to approve the reports of the Boards and Commissions. The motion 29was approved unanimously. 30 31 REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL 32 33There were no reports at this time. 34 35 OLD BUSINESS 36 37There was no Old Business to discuss. 38 39 NEW BUSINESS 40 41At this time Mayor Hammond addressed the Assessment Policy. 42 43Bailey discussed that the assessment policy was presented at a 44previous meeting when at that time Hammond questioned the wording 45of assessing property owners for improvements to State Aid and 46County Aid roadways. Bailey shared that the option to assess is

1 8 1included in the current re-write of the assessment policy. 2Bailey noted that the wording is similar to Fairmont’s policy in 3that it doesn’t state that it will or will not assess for County 4or State Aid roadway improvement projects. 5 6Councilmember Brod discussed that the assessment policy needs to 7be settled to allow the City to move forward with assessing 8properties based on the standard 36 foot residential design 9average of three year’s projects. Hammond questioned if the 10policy was set up to assess the school, St. Lukes and UHD for a 9 11ton road if they require a heavier street design. Brod responded 12that it’s included in the policy. Hammond stated that it would 13be good to have it in the policy to include the streets that are 14State Aid and County Aid at the same time. Bailey stated that 15assessing for those streets is currently allowed in the policy. 16(See Attachment #3) 17 18Motion by Councilmember Huisman, second by Councilmember Kelly to 19accept the Assessment Policy as presented. The motion was 20approved by a 5-1 vote. Mayor Hammond voted against. 21 22Hammond addressed Ordinance 10-06 Regulating the Storage of 23Refuse and Garbage. 24 25City Attorney David Frundt noted the change to the proposed 26ordinance that included allowing the use of dumpsters in areas 27zoned R-3 Multiple Family Urban Districts. This change would 28include St. Lukes but would not include the Crescent Apartments 29or other apartment complexes. Frundt questioned if regulating 30the storage of refuse and garbage could be done by zoning 31restrictions. Councilmember Brod commented that accomplishing it 32by spot zoning does not work. Bailey agreed that regulating 33dumpster use by zones does create problems. Frundt discussed 34that if the ordinance is approved the City would need to make 35exceptions immediately to accommodate some facilities or rezone 36portions of the City. 37 38Hammond questioned if there is city code that addresses dumping 39the dumpsters on a regular basis. Brod shared that the problem 40with the dumpsters is people filling them and leaving them to sit 41for long periods of time. Gaylord questioned if it would work to 42require that all dumpsters be dumped once a week. Frundt 43suggested removing the zoning language and have a one week 44requirement across the board for dumping. Brod agreed that if 45the dumpster is dumped weekly the problem is eliminated. 46

1 9 1Bailey questioned if there would be an exception for construction 2projects. Hammond recommended a provision for construction 3projects through the building permit process. Brod shared that 4he would prefer not to require residents to register and pay a 5fee for the use of a dumpster. Kelly noted that dumpster use for 6construction is already addressed in the proposed ordinance. 7Frundt agreed that it is not realistic to require weekly dumping 8of a dumpster for construction projects. Frundt suggesting 9addressing this issue by regulating the size of the dumpster 10being used for the construction project. Kelly recommended 11limiting the dumpster use for construction materials only. 12 13Councilmember Huisman questioned who would enforce the penalty 14for not having the dumpster dumped weekly. Frundt responded that 15enforcement of the ordinance would be under the code enforcement 16policy. Huisman commented that the Council passes city codes and 17puts them in the book but nobody enforces them. 18 19Gaylord addressed the issue of dumpsters sitting empty for months 20on residential properties. Brod questioned what the City would 21do with residents that own their own dumpster. Hammond 22recommended a one week limit for waste and one month limit for 23construction projects. 24 25Councilmember Wiborg questioned who would be responsible for the 26enforcement of the ordinance. Wiborg added that the enforcement 27policy should make the police responsible for the enforcement of 28the ordinance. City Administrator Kathy Bailey discussed that 29the code enforcement policy reads that the zoning official would 30be responsible for checking the dumpsters every week. Bailey 31questioned how much time the City should spend on enforcing 32having dumpsters emptied. Bailey shared that the current system 33for addressing dumpsters is on a complaint basis. Gaylord 34discussed that it shouldn’t be necessary to check every dumpster 35in the city every day and added that the issue should be 36addressed when there’s a complaint. Bailey stated that the 37City’s current system is done by complaints. 38 39Frundt stated that an administrative fine could be applied rather 40than charging the property owner with a petty misdemeanor. 41Hammond stated that he would prefer a complaint system by 42neighboring property owners rather than having the dumpsters 43checked weekly. Kelly questioned if the dumpster requirements 44could be provided to the waste haulers to give them notice of the 45City’s ordinance. Bailey responded that the City cannot make the 46waste haulers change their business practices and shared that the

1 10 1haulers could be informed of the dumpster ordinance in addition 2to it being published. 3 4The council recommended that Frundt change the ordinance to read 5that all dumpsters, including commercial dumpsters, get dumped 6once a week, construction projects can keep their dumpsters for 7one month and residential dumpsters are allowed to stay for one 8week. 9 10Hammond addressed Resolution 10-21 Declaring Property Surplus and 11Authorizing the Sale of Such Property. (See attachment #4) 12 13City Administrator Kathy Bailey informed the Council that the 14Fire Department is requesting to advertise for sale a 1964 Ford 15Pumper Fire Truck. Bailey shared that the truck had been held 16onto to renovate as an antique parade unit but due to the lack of 17storage space and tight budgets the Fire Department is looking to 18sell the unit. 19 20Motion by Councilmember Huisman, second by Councilmember Wiborg 21to approve Resolution 10-21 Declaring Property Surplus and 22Authorizing the Sale of the 1964 Ford Pumper Fire Truck. The 23motion was approved unanimously. 24 25Mayor Hammond addressed the Work Session Old Business agenda item 26of the Wind Generation Ordinance. 27 28Bailey discussed that the moratorium that was previously placed 29on wind energy conversion systems within the City limits will 30expire the end of September 2010. Bailey provided information 31from the League of Minnesota Cities on planning for wind 32generators, an article from the Office of Energy Security from 33the Minnesota Department of Commerce and ordinances from 34Arlington, Big Lake and Otsego addressing the issue. 35 36Councilmember Kelly requested additional time to review the 37City’s existing ordinance on wind generators. Frundt recommended 38bringing the City’s moratorium back to discuss at the next City 39Council meeting. 40 41Mayor Hammond addressed the Work Session New Business agenda item 42of the pool closing. 43 44Councilmember Brod noted that this has been one of the hottest 45summers in recent years. Brod discussed that the pool is a 46service to the residents of the community and requested Council

1 11 1consideration of keeping the pool open for the last week of 2summer even if it’s for limited hours. 3 4City Administrator Kathy Bailey shared that Pool Director 5Michelle Hall and possibly one additional lifeguard are available 6to work at the pool beyond August 28 due to school activities and 7students returning to college. Bailey noted the closing dates of 8the other area pools that included Fairmont on August 27, Wells 9on August 22, Bricelyn on August 20 and Winnebago on August 22. 10 11Brod stated that the closing date of the pool needs to be looked 12at and questioned if the City is certain that there aren’t enough 13lifeguards available to keep it open an additional week. 14Councilmember Gaylord agreed that the pool director should be 15asked if it would be at all possible to keep the pool open longer 16this summer. 17 18 BILLS AND INVESTMENTS 19 20Motion by Councilmember Gaylord, second by Councilmember Wiborg 21acknowledging financial reports and payment of the bills. The 22motion was approved unanimously. 23 24 REPORT OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR 25 26City Administrator Kathy Bailey reported on her meeting with Matt 27Maes from Waste Management to discuss dumpster regulations in 28residential neighborhoods. 29 30Bailey discussed the bond rating review she participated in with 31Standard & Poor’s rating agency. Bailey shared that the City’s 32bond rating will remain A+. 33 34Bailey reported that the auditor’s adjusting entries have been 35completed, TIF reports filed and the 2011 budget format has been 36set. Bailey shared that work has begun with department heads on 37setting their 2011 budgets. 38 39Bailey discussed that the health insurance rates have not been 40provided and union negotiations will begin as both union 41agreements are expiring. 42 43Bailey shared that the Parks and Recreation Subcommittee have 44been discussing a picnic shelter and bathroom at the Steinberg 45Park in addition to replacing the picnic shelter at Putnam Park.

1 12 1Bailey has inquired about the availability of funds through 2Region 9. 3 4Bailey discussed the entrance sign design for Putnam Park and the 5commemorative plaque for Putnam Park that will be mounted on a 6pedestal. Bailey invited the Council to attend the Pool 7Celebration at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 17 in Putnam Park. 8Bailey noted that recognition would be given to those that worked 9so hard on the fundraising for the pool project. Bailey shared 10that there would be a free swim until 8:30 p.m. in addition to 11other activities that are planned for the event. 12 13Bailey reported on the judge training session and the recent 14primary election. 15 16Bailey shared that she spoke with two contractors for estimates 17on the needed repairs to the Hanson building at the corner of 18Main and 6th Street. Bailey stated that if the repairs cost more 19than the value of the building the recommendation would be to 20remove the building. 21 22Bailey discussed the recent contractor utility meeting to discuss 23the sewer extension projects, the Street Commission meeting with 24the UHD Executive Committee to discuss the 10th and Galbraith 25Street reconstruction and assessment policy and the upcoming 26assessment hearing for the recently completed street projects. 27 28Bailey reported that the candidates that will appear on the City 29ballot in November include: 30 31First Ward Councilmember (4 year term): Richard Scholtes, Corey 32Survis and Paul Nuessmeier. 33 34Second Ward Councilmember (4 year term): Russ Erichsrud and Les 35Wiborg. 36 37Third Ward Councilmember (4 year term): John Gartzke and Gary 38Meyer. 39 40Third Ward Councilmember (2 year term/Special term): Allen Aukes 41and Paula Kelly. 42 43Board of Public Works (4 year term): Dan Mensing and Mark Loge. 44 45 OTHER BUSINESS 46

1 13 1There was no other business to discuss. 2 3At this time Mayor Hammond moved that the Council enter into 4closed session to discuss land purchases and land valuation 5appeal. 6 7The council meeting was closed at 7:00 p.m. 8 9Mayor Hammond reconvened the Council meeting at 7:19 p.m. 10 11 ADJOURNMENT 12 13Mayor Hammond adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:20 14p.m.