DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction Methodology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction Methodology RYHALL AND BELMESTOPE PARISH SURVEY RESULTS Survey undertaken August/September 2017 Survey results approved and ratified by the Parish Council May 2018 Results published June 2018 Introduction In response to the national need for more housing, Rutland County Council has drawn up a Local Plan for countywide development in the period up to 2036. This will require the addition of 1,700 dwellings. The nine large Rutland villages, of which Ryhall is one, are expected to contribute one-third of this total, i.e. 566 dwellings. Were this spread equally amongst the nine it would require Ryhall to expand by ca. 63 dwellings. Ryhall Parish Council considered formally contributing a Neighbourhood Plan, but following consultation with parishioners instead opted for a simpler Parish Plan. The first stage in this process was to canvass the views of Ryhall and Belmesthorpe residents through a survey. Methodology Accordingly a volunteer working party project team was formed chaired by Dave Amies, including Linda & Simon Davies, Pat Bate and Andrew Nebel, and authorized to undertake the survey. With very significant support from Caroline Adams, Parish Clerk, a review of other Rutland Villages’ neighbourhood planning surveys was undertaken and used to design a questionnaire adjudged specifically suitable to the needs of our villages. In addition, a questionnaire was designed for completion by all year 6 pupils of Ryhall CE Academy. 700 questionnaires were printed and through the kind voluntary assistance of Tony Dolby and Andy Thomas, one was delivered to every dwelling in Ryhall and Belmesthorpe. A total of 217 completed questionnaires were returned from Ryhall residents [a 33% response rate] and 20 from Belmesthorpe [a response rate of 25%] to collection points at the Village Stores, The Library, the School and the Blue Bell public house. It is for the Parish Council to assess whether this level of response is regarded as indicative of village opinion. The analysis in the report is based upon the entire universe of completed questionnaires, however as we also gathered the respondents’ demography further specialist analysis can be provided upon request. For example we can look to see if there are significant differential responses from older or younger respondents, or by duration of residence in the village etc. 1 It should be noted that 64% of responses were received from people aged over 60 and only 13% were from under 40 year olds. It is not known if this reflects the general population profile of the village as a whole, but it is the author’s view that it probably doesn’t and thus opinions harvested by this survey are skewed in favour of this older subset of the community. The school questionnaires have been data captured, but are yet to be analysed and a separate report will be produced shortly to garner its comments. It has proved a very significant exercise to data capture the responses to the 30 questions submitted by 236 residents [creating over 7000 items to record and analyse] and we are indebted to the project team members for their voluntary effort in undertaking this labourious exercise. Assistance from Michelle Nebel in spreadsheet design and pivot table analysis was invaluable. A copy of the adult questionnaire is attached as Appendix 1. When reading the ‘Pie Charts’ in the report use the sequence of the key to read clockwise from 12 o clock. Overview A third of Ryhall residents and just over a quarter of those in Belmesthorpe responded with completed questionnaires. Ryhall residents are broadly very happy with the way things are in the village and there is a broad consensus about what they like/dislike and wish for their future. The quiet rural atmosphere and friendly community spirit are very frequently mentioned. The shop/post office and pubs are seen as important village facilities, as are the Library, Meadows, School, Allotments and Village Hall. Strongly worded and consistent mention was made of the importance of Ryhall maintaining its integrity by being clearly separated from Belmesthorpe and Stamford by green spaces. The response to whether further residential development should happen was less negative than one might have imagined with most respondents indicating agreement that some managed expansion should be permitted. The question is by what scale; 27% said they would be happy with up to 20 new dwellings, whilst 64% were prepared to see over 30 new properties. But only 25% would be content with more than 40 new houses … or put another way 75% would oppose more than 40 new dwellings. 2 Development on the Trout farm site is seen as acceptable by most people at 63% approval, however 29% opposed use of this site. Development on the Meadow Lane site is much less welcome and was opposed by 58%, although there is a significant minority of 29% supporting use of this site. However it would be wrong to interpret this as support for the size of development proposed by RCC [84 dwellings] since only 8% were willing to see more than 70 new dwellings being built. This suggests that an option might be to consider a smaller Meadow Lane development of ca. 40 dwellings, sited as a number of people have suggested in the south-western half of the field with a boundary on the existing footpath separating the eastern half and river bank which might become amenity space for the village. Respondents were asked to state the style of housing that Parish Council should prioritise for future development. Starter, smaller family homes and Adapted/Easy Access homes were most frequently mentioned. Given the skew to older respondents it is unsurprising that when asked about individual’s future needs, downsizing and /or moving to a bungalow are most frequently mentioned. If development is to allowed this need should be recognised, as it would free up existing houses available for new residents. If development of scale were to occur there are high levels of concern about the impact this would have upon traffic and parking, the loss of green spaces and a consequent loss of the village’s character. A less mentioned point, but no less relevant, was the comment from one person about the sewage treatment works capacity to cope with more effluent as this regularly already smells offensively in summer. Other matters which emerged as of concern to residents and which might be regarded as ‘pay attention issues’ for the Parish Council to consider further are:- Dog & horse fouling and litter. Parking around the school Speeding in the village and on the A6121 … 50% would welcome a 20mph zone in the village although opinions about traffic calming measures are equally divided for and against. Parking in general and in particular around the school The absence of pavements in Church Street, The Square and New Road The desire for a footpath between Ryhall and Belmesthorpe Balk Road’s surface and pavements Concern about the empty butchers shop …although if approval for conversion to a dwelling is given this becomes irrelevant. However it should be noted that many people would like still to have a butchers shop in the village. Although only 29% expressed a concern about crime there was a majority of 56% who said they felt the Police presence in the village needed improvement. 3 Overhanging hedges, trees and the condition of verges were also frequently mentioned as of concern. And 10 people mentioned they would like to see a GP surgery/pharmacy/podiatry clinic There was support from 62% of respondents to the idea of a new pavilion. The detail in the report summary below is worthy of further study, as it will reveal more detail of villager’s attitudes and opinions … much of which is favourable but also points to areas of desired improvement. Detailed Summary of Responses The results are separately summarised for each village below. For each structured question the counts are shown as tables/graphs with an interpretative comment for the most frequently mentioned subjects. For the open-ended questions the responses have been grouped by topic and the most frequently mentioned issues have been counted. The results of the children’s questionnaire will be the subject of a separate report to be completed shortly. Q1 What do you enjoy/like about living in your village? Q1. Ryhall The quiet and peaceful nature of the village was most frequently mentioned at 92%. All other aspects were highly valued, albeit facilities and easy access were valued lesser but still by 72% of respondents. 25 respondents offered a narrative response [not all of which was relevant to the question] which can be collectively summarised as: - 4 said amazing facilities/brilliant shop & Post Office and Pubs 6 said small/beautiful/quiet/safe 4 3 said friendly/ good community 4 said river, wildlife and separate from Stamford Q1. Belmesthorpe % Quiet/peaceful 18 90 Rural 17 85 Access to Country 18 90 Community 12 60 Good Facilities 5 25 Easy Access 12 60 Other 0 0 Over half of the respondents highly valued the quiet, peaceful, rural, community which provides easy access to the countryside. Q2. What features do you think would be most important for the villages to have? Q2. Ryhall Trees and wildlife corridors were most appreciated being mentioned by three- quarters of respondents, followed by two-thirds mentioning green spaces, allotments and a quality pavilion. Shops were regarded as important by over half of all respondents. 36 respondents offered a narrative response [not all of which was relevant to the question] that can be collectively summarised as: - 7 said A butcher 5 3 said GP/health facilities/exercise facilities 3 said Coffee shop/café/picnic tables/ places to meet 2 said Facilities for children/young people 1 said Footpath to Belmesthorpe 1 said A bigger sewage treatment plant if village expands 1 said Safer crossing on Turnpike 1 said Speed cameras Q2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Casterton Parish Plan 2005
    A1 © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Rutland Council District Council Licence No. LA 100018056 With Special thanks to: 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. History 3. Community and household 4. Transport and traffic 5. Crime and community safety 6. Sport and leisure 7. Youth 8. Village church 9. Education 10. Retail services 11. Farming and heritage 12. Conservation and the environment 13. Planning and development 14. Health and social services 15. Information and communication 16. Local councils 17. Conclusion 18. Action plan 3 INTRODUCTION PARISH PLANS Parish plans are part of the “Vital Villages” initiative of the Countryside Agency, run locally through the Rural Community Council (Leicestershire & Rutland). A Parish Plan should provide a picture of a village, identifying through consultation the concerns and needs of its residents. From the plan villages should identify actions to improve the village and the life of the community. The resulting Village Action Plan is then used to inform the County Council, through the Parish Council. Parish Plans have a statutory place in local government. GREAT CASTERTON PARISH PLAN Great Casterton’s Parish Plan started with a meeting of villagers in June 2002. There was particular interest because of a contentious planning decision imposed by the County Council on the village. The Community Development Officer for Rutland, Adele Stainsby, explained the purpose of the plan and the benefits for the village. A committee was formed, and a constitution drawn up. The Parish Council promised a small initial grant while an application for Countryside Agency funding was prepared. The money granted was to be balanced by the voluntary work of villagers.
    [Show full text]
  • RISE up STAND out This Guide Should Cover What You Need to Know Before You Apply, but It Won’T Cover Everything About College
    RISE UP STAND OUT This guide should cover what you need to know before you apply, but it won’t cover everything about College. We 2020-21 WELCOME TO know that sometimes you can’t beat speaking to a helpful member of the VIRTUAL team about your concerns. OPEN Whether you aren’t sure about your bus EVENTS STAMFORD route, where to sit and have lunch or want to meet the tutors and ask about your course, you can Live Chat, call or 14 Oct 2020 email us to get your questions answered. COLLEGE 4 Nov 2020 Remember, just because you can’t visit 25 Nov 2020 us, it doesn’t mean you can’t meet us! 20 Jan 2021 Find out more about our virtual open events on our website. Contents Our Promise To You ..............................4 Childcare ....................................................66 Careers Reference ................................. 6 Computing & IT..................................... 70 Facilities ........................................................ 8 Construction ............................................74 Life on Campus ...................................... 10 Creative Arts ...........................................80 Student Support ....................................12 Hair & Beauty ......................................... 86 Financial Support ................................. 14 Health & Social Care .......................... 90 Advice For Parents ...............................16 Media ........................................................... 94 Guide to Course Levels ......................18 Motor Vehicle ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 219832 the Old Plough.Indd
    AN ATTRACTIVE DOUBLE FRONTED DETACHED DWELLING IN A PRIVATE VILLAGE SETTING, WITH THREE ANCILLARY STONE BARNS AND LANDSCAPED GARDENS the old plough, church street, carlby, stamford, lincolnshire, pe9 4nb AN ATTRACTIVE DOUBLE FRONTED DETACHED DWELLING IN A PRIVATE VILLAGE SETTING, WITH THREE ANCILLARY STONE BARNS AND LANDSCAPED GARDENS the old plough, church street, carlby, stamford, lincolnshire, pe9 4nb Entrance hallway w Sitting room w Dining Kitchen w Study/Play room w Utility w Principal bedroom with en suite w Three further bedrooms w Family bathroom w Driveway & extensive parking w Three ancillary stone barns w Landscaped private gardens Mileage Stamford 6 miles (Trains to Peterborough from 10 mins and Cambridge from 65 mins) w Bourne & Market Deeping 7 miles w Peterborough Railway Station 15 miles (London Kings Cross from 49 mins) Situation Carlby is an attractive small village with a supportive village community, served by Ryhall Primary School, a village with which it often twins for community events. Almost midway between Stamford and Bourne amidst attractive rolling countryside, whilst rural, the village is well connected. The attractive Georgian market towns of Stamford, Bourne and Market Deeping are all within 7 miles of Carlby. For commuters, Stamford’s railway station has hourly train services to Peterborough (connecting to London Kings Cross services) and Cambridge on the Midlands Cross Country Birmingham Airport to Stansted Airport line. Further, the Cathedral City of Peterborough (15 miles) offers a wider range of retail outlets, including the Queensgate Shopping Centre and mainline commuter services to London Kings Cross. Schooling is also well catered for in the area with a choice of private schooling, aside from good state education in Ryhall.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.199 LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.199 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT ' NO. 199. PW To the Et Hon Merlyn Rees, HP Secretory of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS KOH FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT OF RUTLAND IN THE COUNTY OF LEICESTERSHIRE 1* We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the district of Rutland, in . accordance with the requirements of section 63 oft and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act, 19?2, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that District. 2* In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 31 December 1971*- that we were to undertake this review* This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to Rutland Idutrict Council, copies of which were circulated to the Leicestershire County Council, Parish Councils and Parish Meetings, the member of Parliament for the constituency concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press* Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies* 3* Rutland District Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representa- tion for our consideration. When doing so, they were asked to observe the rules laid down in Schedule 11 to the Local Government Act 1972 and the guidelines which we set out in our Report No 6 about the proposed size of the Council and the proposed number of councillors for each ward.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment of Rutland (2003)
    RUTLAND LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT BY DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES Sherwood House 144 Annesley Road Hucknall Nottingham NG15 7DD Tel 0115 968 0092 Fax 0115 968 0344 Doc. Ref. 1452rpt Issue: 02 Date: 31st May 2003 Contents 1. Purpose of this Report 1 2. Introduction to Landscape Character Assessment 2 3. Landscape Character Types in Rutland 5 4. The Landscape of High Rutland 7 Leighfield Forest 8 Ridges and Valleys 9 Eyebrook Valley 10 Chater Valley 11 5. The Landscape of the Vale of Catmose 15 6. The Landscape of the Rutland Water Basin 18 7. The Landscape of the Rutland Plateau 20 Cottesmore Plateau 21 Clay Woodlands 23 Gwash Valley 24 Ketton Plateau 25 8. The Landscape of the Welland Valley 28 Middle Valley West 28 Middle Valley East 29 Figures and Maps Figure 1 Landscape Character Types and Sub-Areas Figure 2 Key to 1/25,000 Maps Maps 1 - 10 Detailed 1/25,000 maps showing boundaries of Landscape Character Types and Sub-Areas Photographs Sheet 1 High Rutland and Welland Valley Sheet 2 Vale of Catmose and Rutland Water Basin Sheet 3 Rutland Plateau References 1 Leicestershire County Council, 1976, County Landscape Appraisal 2 Leicestershire County Council, 1995 published 2001, Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Landscape and Woodland Strategy 3 Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, 2002, Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland 4 Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and the Landscape Institute, 2002, Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Spons 5 Countryside Agency and English Nature, 1997, The Character of England: Landscape Wildlife and Natural Features and Countryside Agency, 1999, Countryside Character Volume 4: East Midlands 6 Department of Environment, 1997 Planning Policy Guidance 7 The Countryside - Environmental Quality and Economic and Social Development RUTLAND LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT DTA 2003 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
    Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
    [Show full text]
  • Rutland 1851 Census Returns
    CULPIN-net Census Finds for CULPIN in Rutland 1851 Estimat Surnam Relationshi Marital ed Birth Birth Residence Residence Sch Address Given Name Age Gender Occupation Birth City REF YEAR e p to Head Status Birth County Country Place County No Year Edith John Calpin Head 43 1808 Male Ag Lab Rutland England Edith Weston Rutland HO107-2092 49 1851 Weston Abigail Calpin Wife 41 1810 Female Ag Labs Wife Thorston Notts England Edith Weston Rutland HO107-2092 49 1851 John Calpin Son 15 1836 Male Ketton Rutland England Edith Weston Rutland HO107-2092 49 1851 George Calpin Son 13 1838 Male Ketton Rutland England Edith Weston Rutland HO107-2092 49 1851 Edith Henry Calpin Son 10 1841 Male Scholar Rutland England Edith Weston Rutland HO107-2092 49 1851 Weston Edith Amos Calpin Son 7 1844 Male Scholar Rutland England Edith Weston Rutland HO107-2092 49 1851 Weston Mother-in- Mary Culpin 61 1790 Female Uppingham Rutland England ketton Rutland HO107-2094 84 1851 law Elizabeth Culpin Visitor 30 1821 Female Ketton Rutland England ketton Rutland HO107-2094 84 1851 William Culpin Head 59 1792 Male Ag Lab Ketton Rutland England Clipsham Rutland HO107-2094 8 1851 Mary Culpin Wife 60 1791 Female Carlby Lincs England Clipsham Rutland HO107-2094 8 1851 Thomas Culpin Son 39 1812 Male Ag Lab Clipsham Rutland England Clipsham Rutland HO107-2094 8 1851 Edith Edith William Culpin Head 41 1810 Male Rutland England Rutland HO107-2092 23 1851 Shepherd Weston Weston Colly Edith Elizabeth Culpin Wife 45 1806 Female rthamptonsh England Rutland HO107-2092 23 1851 Weston Weston
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Great Casterton, Stamford, Rutland
    A productive parcel of Grade 2 arable land, North of Stamford, in Rutland Land at Great Casterton, Stamford, Rutland Land at Great Casterton Farm Business Tenancy Overage Health & Safety The land is currently let on a Farm Business The property is subject to overage provisions. Given the potential hazards of a working farm we Stamford, Rutland, PE4 4AT Tenancy which is due to terminate on 26 These will apply in the event of a change of ask you to be as vigilant as possible when making September 2018. use of all or part of the land for uses other than your inspection for your own personal safety. A productive parcel of Grade 2 arable agriculture. In such instance, the buyer (and land in an outstanding area of Rutland, Services successors in title) will pay to the seller 50% of Directions North of Stamford There are no services to the property. the uplift in value for a period of 80 years. From Stamford, take the B1081 Casterton Road towards Tickencote. At the crossroads in the Stamford 2 miles, Peterborough 18 miles, Wayleaves, Rights of Way & Easements Local Authority village of Great Casterton take the right hand Melton Mowbray 20 miles The sale is subject to all rights of support, Rutland County Council Tel: 01572 722577 turn onto Ryhall Road, leading towards Ryhall. including public and private rights of way, water, The land is located on the right hand side after Location light, drainage and other easements, quasi- VAT approximately 0.75 miles. The land lies to the North East of Great easements, wayleaves and restrictive covenants Any guide price quoted or discussed is Casterton village in Rutland, the land is accessed and all existing proposed wayleaves for masts, exclusive of VAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Rutland Record Number Nine
    No. 9 1989 Journal of the Rutland Record Society The Rutland Record Society was formed in May 1979. Its object is to advise the education of the public in the history of the Ancient County of Rutland, in particular by collecting, preserving, printing and publishing historical records relating to that County, making su ch records accessible for research purposes to anyone following a particular line of historical study, and stimulating interest generally in the history of that County. PATRON Col. T. C. S. Haywood, O.B.E, J.P. Gunthorpe Hall, Oakham PRESIDENT G. H. Boyle, Esq., Bisbrooke Hall, Uppingham CHAIRMAN Prince Yuri Galitzine, Quaintree Hall, Braunston, Oakham VICE-CHAIRMAN D. H. Tew, Esq., 3 Sandringham Close, Oakham HONORARY SECRETARY Peter N. Lane, Esq., 3 Chestnut Close, Uppingham HONORARY TREASURER Dr. M. Tillbrook, 7 Redland Road, Oakham HONORARY MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY Mrs R. Outram, 10 Barleythorpe Road, Oakham HONORARY SOLICITOR J. B. Ervin, Esq., McKinnell, Ervin & Mitchell, 1 & 3 New Street, Leicester HONORARY ARCHIVIST G. A. Chinnery, Esq., Pear Tree Cottage, Hungarton, Leicestershire HONORARY EDITOR Bryan Waites, Esq., 6 Chater Road, Oakham COUNCIL President, Vice-President, Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Trustees, Secretary, Treasurer, Solicitor, Archivist, Editor, Membership Secretary, T. H. McK. Clough, M. E. Baines, J. Field, Miss C. Hill, Miss E. B. Dean, Miss J. Spencer, Mrs H. Broughton The Rutland Record Society is a registered· charity Enquiries about subscriptions, donations, covenants, corporate membership etc. should be made to the Honorary Membership Secretary The Rutland Record Society welcomes new members and hopes to encourage them to participate in the Society's activities at all levels including indexing sources, transcribing records, locating sources, research, writing and publication, projects, symposia, fund-raising and sponsorship etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rutland County Council: Ryhall Walks
    www.rutland.gov.uk/row W: [email protected] E: 771117 01572 T: 28 - 34 Station Approach, Oakham, Rutland, LE15 6QW 6QW LE15 Rutland, Oakham, Approach, Station 34 - 28 Highways Council County Rutland Rutland County Council Highways at the address below: below: address the at Highways Council County Rutland or require it in an alternative format please contact contact please format alternative an in it require or If you require further information regarding this leaflet leaflet this regarding information further require you If theatres in the grounds. the in theatres who created one of Europe’s finest open air air open finest Europe’s of one created who acquired by the Stamford Shakespeare Company, Company, Shakespeare Stamford the by acquired Explorer 234 Explorer In 1977 the near derelict Tolethorpe Hall was was Hall Tolethorpe derelict near the 1977 In Landranger 130 Landranger Separatists. were Fathers Pilgrim the and Night” Ordnance Survey Maps Survey Ordnance Shakespeare referred to the Brownists in “Twelfth “Twelfth in Brownists the to referred Shakespeare separate church from the Church of England. England. of Church the from church separate movement, also known as Brownists, seeking a a seeking Brownists, as known also movement, The nearest railway station is Stamford. is station railway nearest The Rail: and leading campaigner of the religious Separatist Separatist religious the of campaigner leading and www.traveline.org.uk www.traveline.org.uk E: 2002233 0871 T: by the Brownes. Robert Browne was the founder founder the was Browne Robert Brownes. the by Stamford. from 202 and 4 Services Bus: Norman family.
    [Show full text]
  • Polling Station Postal Address
    Polling place addresses Parishes voting at station Ridlington Village Hall Ayston Main Street Ridlington Ridlington Oakham Rutland LE15 9AU Belton Village Hall Belton-in-Rutland Main Street Belton-in-Rutland LE15 9LB Braunston Village Hall Braunston-in-Rutland Wood Lane Brooke Braunston-in-Rutland Leighfield Oakham Rutland LE15 8QZ Preston Village Hall Preston Main Street Preston Oakham Rutland LE15 9NJ Cottesmore Village Hall The Community Centre Barrow 23 Main Street Cottesmore Cottesmore Oakham Rutland LE15 7DH Market Overton Village Hall Market Overton 52 Main Street Market Overton Oakham Rutland LE15 7PL Ashwell Village Hall Ashwell Brookdene Burley Ashwell Oakahm Rutland LE15 7LQ Egleton Village Hall Egleton Church Lane Hambleton Oakham Rutland LE15 8AD Exton Village Hall Exton & Horn The Green Whitwell Exton Oakham Rutland LE15 8AP The Olive Branch, Clipsham Clipsham Pickworth Main Street Clipsham Oakham Rutland LE15 7SH Greetham Community Centre Greetham Great Lane Greetham Oakham Rutland LE15 7NG Jackson Stops, Stretton Stretton Rookery Lane Thistleton Stretton Oakham Rutland LE15 7RA Barrowden Village Hall Barrowden Wakerley Road Barrowden Oakham Rutland LE15 8EP Ketton Library Ketton High Street Tixover Ketton Stamford Lincs PE9 3TE Tinwell Village Hall Tinwell Rear of All Saints Church Off Crown Lane Tinwell Nr Stamford Lincs PE9 3UD Langham Village Hall Langham Church Street Langham Oakham Rutland LE15 7HY St John The Baptist Church Bisbrooke Church Lane Bisbrooke Uppingham LE15 9EL Caldecott Village Hall Caldecott Church
    [Show full text]
  • 21 January 2020 63/20
    Rutland County Council telephone: 01572 722 577 Catmose fax: 01572 758 307 Oakham email: [email protected] Rutland web: www.rutland.gov.uk LE15 6HP 21 January 2020 63/20 - ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REGULATIONS REQUEST Dear Sir/Madam Your request for information has now been considered and the information requested is provided below. Request: Please could you provide all documentation relating to the installation of the two traffic calming measures on Tolethorpe, either side of the village of Little Casterton. One is located next to the junction with Little Casterton Road and the other near the junction of Salters Lane. In particular, I would like to see any risk assessments or safety assessments made prior to their installation, documentation outlining the justification for installation and the process that was undertaken in order to make the decision to install them. Response: Both of these chicanes were installed following requests by the Parish Council after they raised concerns relating to speeding traffic. Toll Bar end of Little Casterton – The scheme proposal was sent to the police on the 22nd January 2016, who responded with no objections to the scheme. The scheme was then installed in July 2016. The chicane at this end of the village has been successful in reducing vehicle speeds. Previously the average speed was 34mph and the 85th percentile was 39mph. Following the installation of the chicane the average speed reduced to 21mph and the 85th percentile to 24mph. Ryhall end of Little Casterton – This scheme was sent to the police, who responded with no objections to the scheme.
    [Show full text]