DOCSLIB.ORG

DOE/EA-1521; Environmental Assessment for Spring Canyon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DOE/EA-1521; Environmental Assessment for Spring Canyon EA, Spring Canyon Wind Project ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED............................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Federal Agency Action ............................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Applicant's Purpose and Need .................................................................... 3 1.3 SCOPING .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................................ 5 2.1 WESTERN'S PROPOSED ACTION ........................................................................ 5 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF INVENERGY'S PROPOSED PROJECT................................. 5 2.2.1 Overview..................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Construction................................................................................................ 9 2.2.2.1 Road and Pad Construction.......................................................... 10 2.2.2.2 Foundations and Tower Erection................................................. 12 2.2.2.3 Trenching and Placement of Underground Electrical and Communications Cables ............................................................... 15 2.2.2.4 Overhead Electrical Power and Communication System ............ 15 2.2.2.5 Installation of FAA-required Lights ............................................ 16 2.2.2.6 Substation and O&M Building Construction............................... 16 2.2.2.7 Final Testing ................................................................................ 17 2.2.2.8 Final Road Grading, Erosion Control, and Site Clean-up ........... 17 2.2.3 Public Access and Safety............................................................................ 19 2.2.4 Operations and Maintenance ...................................................................... 19 2.2.5 Work Force ................................................................................................. 20 2.2.6 Traffic ......................................................................................................... 20 2.2.7 Water Use.................................................................................................... 21 2.2.8 Hazardous Materials ................................................................................... 22 2.2.9 Reclamation and Abandonment.................................................................. 22 2.2.10 Western's Standard Construction, Operation, and Maintenance Practices .................................................................................................... 23 2.2.11 Applicant-committed Mitigation Measures.............................................. 23 2.2.11.1 Fire Control................................................................................ 26 2.2.11.2 Cultural Resources..................................................................... 26 2.2.11.3 Paleontologic Resources............................................................ 27 2.2.11.4 Air Quality/Noise....................................................................... 27 2.2.11.5 Vegetation.................................................................................. 27 2.2.11.6 Noxious Weeds .......................................................................... 28 2.2.11.7 Streams and Wetlands................................................................ 28 2.2.11.8 Soils ........................................................................................... 29 2.2.11.9 Wildlife ...................................................................................... 29 x EA, Spring Canyon Wind Project TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 2.2.11.10 Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species and State-listed Threatened and Endangered Species ...................................................................... 31 2.2.11.11 Sanitation ................................................................................. 33 2.2.11.12 Existing Utilities ...................................................................... 33 2.2.11.13 Miscellaneous .......................................................................... 33 2.3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT REJECTED.............................................. 34 2.4 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE................................................................................. 34 2.5 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS................................................... 35 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 39 3.1 CLIMATE AND AIR QUALITY ............................................................................. 39 3.1.1 Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project......................................... 39 3.1.1.1 Climate......................................................................................... 39 3.1.1.2 Air Quality ................................................................................... 40 3.1.2 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures...................................... 42 3.1.2.1 Significance Criteria .................................................................... 42 3.1.2.2 Impacts of the Proposed Project .................................................. 42 3.1.2.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative.......................................... 43 3.1.2.4 Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 43 3.2 GEOLOGY, PALEONTOLOGY, AND SOILS ....................................................... 43 3.2.1 Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project......................................... 43 3.2.1.1 Geology........................................................................................ 43 3.2.1.2 Paleontology ................................................................................ 45 3.2.1.3 Soils ............................................................................................. 55 3.2.2 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures...................................... 55 3.2.2.1 Significance Criteria .................................................................... 55 3.2.2.2 Impacts of the Proposed Project .................................................. 57 3.2.2.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative.......................................... 58 3.2.2.4 Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 58 3.3 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................. 58 3.3.1 Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project......................................... 58 3.3.2 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures...................................... 61 3.3.2.1 Significance Criteria .................................................................... 61 3.3.2.2 Impacts of Proposed Project ........................................................ 61 3.3.2.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative.......................................... 62 3.3.2.4 Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 63 3.4 FLOODPLAINS AND WETLANDS........................................................................ 63 3.4.1 Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project......................................... 63 3.4.2 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures...................................... 64 EA, Spring Canyon Wind Project xi TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page 3.4.2.1 Significance Criteria .................................................................... 64 3.4.2.2 Impacts of the Proposed Project .................................................. 64 3.4.2.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative.......................................... 64 3.4.2.4 Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 64 3.5 VEGETATION.......................................................................................................... 65 3.5.1 Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project......................................... 65 3.5.2 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures...................................... 65 3.5.2.1 Significance Criteria .................................................................... 65 3.5.2.2 Impacts of the Proposed Project .................................................. 65 3.5.2.3 Impacts of the No Action Alternative.......................................... 67 3.5.2.4 Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 67 3.6 WILDLIFE................................................................................................................. 68 3.6.1 Environmental Setting of the Proposed Project.......................................... 68 3.6.2 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures...................................... 70 3.6.2.1 Significance Criteria .................................................................... 70 3.6.2.2 Impacts of the Proposed Project .................................................. 70 3.6.2.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spring 2021 | Issue No
    SPRING 2021 | ISSUE NO. 31 THE CANAL QUARTERLYwww.CanalTrust.org CANAL STEWARDS PROVIDE VITAL SERVICE One of the largest contributions the C&O Stewards perform many types of light Canal Trust makes to the C&O Canal National maintenance tasks, including lopping and Historical Park is the volunteer support pruning, painting, picking up trash, removing we marshal and manage. As the Park's vegetation, raking, and restocking maps and official nonprofit partner, we are focused on trash-free park bags. It's the perfect way for providing volunteer efforts to aid National an individual, couple, or small group to get Park Service (NPS) staff in maintenance and fresh air, exercise, and care for the Park, all beautification projects along the towpath. while social distancing. Every garden mulched and invasive plant pulled by a volunteer is one less chore for an Stewards are able to set their own schedules NPS maintenance worker, freeing him or her in cooperation with the Trust's Canal up for higher-level responsibilities. Stewards Coordinator Becka Lee. Volunteers are required to go through an orientation In late 2020, the Trust added a new volunteer program prior to beginning work at their program to our arsenal, the Canal Stewards site. If you choose to become a Steward, program, which we assumed management you will join the hundreds of dedicated of from NPS staff. Canal Stewards "adopt" volunteers who work to keep the Park clean a section of the canal and maintain it for and safe for its nearly 5 million visitors. For a designated time period. Parking lots, more information, visit www.canaltrust.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012
    KANSAS WIND ENERGY UPDATE HOUSE ENERGY & UTILITIES COMMITTEE KIMBERLY SVATY ON BEHALF OF THE WIND COALITION 23 JANUARY 2012 Operating Kansas Wind Projects •1272.4 MW total installed wind generation •10 operating wind projects •Equates to billions in capital investment and thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs •Kansas has the second best wind resource in the nation th •Ranked 14 in the nation in overall wind power production • Percent of Kansas Power by wind in 2010 – 7.1% th •Kansas ranked 5 in the US in 2010 for percentage of electricity delivered from wind • Operating Kansas Wind Projects Project County Developer Size Power Turbine Installed In-Service Name (MW) Offtaker Type Turbines Year (MW) Gray County Gray NextEra 112 MKEC Vestas 170 2001 KCP&L 660kW Elk River Butler Iberdola 150 Empire GE 1.5 100 2005 Spearville Ford enXco 100.4 KCP&L GE 1.5 67 2006 Spearville II 48 48 2010 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 100.8 Sunflower – 50 Vestas 56 2008 Phase I Ellsworth Energy KCBPU- 25 1.8 Midwest Energy – 24 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 150 Sunflower – 24 GE 99 2008 Phase II Ellsworth Energy Midwest – 24 1.5 IP&L – 15 Springfield -50 Meridian Cloud Horizon 204 Empire – 105 Vestas 67 2008 Way EDP Westar - 96 3.0 Flat Ridge Barber BP Wind 100 Westar Clipper 40 2009 Energy 2.5 Central Wichita RES 99 Westar Vestas 33 2009 Plains Americas 3.0 Greensburg Kiowa John Deere/ 12.5 Kansas Power Pool Suzlon 10 2010 Exelon 1.2 Caney River Elk TradeWind 200 Tennessee Valley Vestas 111 2011 Energy Authority (TVA) 1.8 Operating Kansas Wind Projects Gray County Wind Farm- Gray County, Kansas - Kansas' first commercial wind farm was erected near the town of Montezuma by FPL Energy (now NextEra Energy Resources) in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Pulse Effects on Benthic Invertebrate Assemblages in the Hypolacustric Interstitial Zone of Lake Constance
    Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 48 (2012) 267–277 Available online at: Ó EDP Sciences, 2012 www.limnology-journal.org DOI: 10.1051/limn/2012008 Flood pulse effects on benthic invertebrate assemblages in the hypolacustric interstitial zone of Lake Constance Shannon J. O’Leary1 and Karl M. Wantzen2* 1 School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11733, USA 2 CNRS UMR 6371 CITERES/IPAPE, De´partement des Sciences, Universite´Franc¸ois Rabelais, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France Abstract – In contrast to rivers, the effects of water level fluctuations on the biota are severely understudied in lakes. Lake Constance has a naturally pulsing hydrograph with average amplitudes of 1.4 m between winter drought and summer flood seasons (annual flood pulse (AFP)). Additionally, heavy rainstorms in summer have the potential to create short-term summer flood pulses (SFP). The flood pulse concept for lakes predicts that littoral organisms should be adapted to the regularly occurring AFP, i.e. taking advantage of benefits such as an influx of food sources and low predator pressure, though these organisms will not possess adapta- tions for the SFP. To test this hypothesis, we studied the aquatic invertebrate assemblages colonizing the gravel sediments of Lake Constance, the AFP in spring and a dramatic SFP event consisting of a one meter rise of water level in 24 h. Here, we introduce the term ‘hypolacustric interstitial’ for lakes analog to the hyporheic zone of running water ecosystems. Our results confirm the hypothesis of contrasting effects of a regular AFP and a random SFP indicating that the AFP enhances the productivity and biodiversity of the littoral zone with benthic invertebrates displaying an array of adaptations enabling them to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Springs of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOB WATER- SUPPLY PAPER 338 SPRINGS OF CALIFORNIA BY GEKALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. lntroduction by W. C. Mendenhall ... .. ................................... 5 Physical features of California ...... ....... .. .. ... .. ....... .............. 7 Natural divisions ................... ... .. ........................... 7 Coast Ranges ..................................... ....•.......... _._._ 7 11 ~~:~~::!:: :~~e:_-_-_·.-.·.·: ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::: 12 Sierra Nevada .................... .................................... 12 Southeastern desert ......................... ............. .. ..... ... 13 Faults ..... ....... ... ................ ·.. : ..... ................ ..... 14 Natural waters ................................ _.......................... 15 Use of terms "mineral water" and ''pure water" ............... : .·...... 15 ,,uneral analysis of water ................................ .. ... ........ 15 Source and amount of substances in water ................. ............. 17 Degree of concentration of natural waters ........................ ..· .... 21 Properties of mineral waters . ................... ...... _. _.. .. _... _....• 22 Temperature of natural waters ... : ....................... _.. _..... .... : . 24 Classification of mineral waters ............ .......... .. .. _. .. _......... _ 25 Therapeutic value of waters .................................... ... ... 26 Analyses
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Springs Walking Tour
    The Springs Early advertisement for Steamboat’s springs of Steamboat Springs An elk takes a swim in the Heart Spring pool YOUR EXploration OF THE SPRINGS DISCOVER Steamboat’S SPRINGS: can be tailored to your own curiosity level. By starting IRON SPRING at Iron Spring you are within easy walking distance (about one mile) of five mineral springs. For the more SODA SPRING adventuresome—extend your tour with a hike to SULPHUR SPRING the Sulphur Cave or take a plunge in the “soothing SWEETWATER/LAKE SPRING and health-giving” waters of the Old Town Hot Springs. STEAMBOAT SPRING NARCISSUS/TERRACE SPRING Journey in the footsteps of the Yampatika Ute and BLACK SULPHUR SPRING Arapaho tribes and the early pioneers of Steamboat LITHIA SPRING Springs as you discover the city’s mineral springs. No two springs are alike—and each has its own SULPHUR CAVE special mineral content and intriguing allure. HEART SPRING at THE OLD TOWN HOT SPRINGS Use this map for guidance, as the new trail differs from the Please be advised that the waters in these springs are natural one on the blue signs located at each spring. Suitable walking flowing and untreated. Drinking from the springs may cause shoes are advised since parts of the trail are rough and steep. illness or discomfort. After touring the springs, see if you know which is the: For more information about the springs in Steamboat Springs please visit or call: • Hottest spring? • Tread of Pioneers Museum ~ 8th and Oak 970.879.2214 • Lemonade spring? • City of Steamboat Springs ~ 137 10th Street 970.879.2060 • Most odiferous spring? • Bud Werner Memorial Library ~ 12th and Lincoln 970.879.0240 • Yampatika ~ 925 Weiss Drive 970.871.9151 • Most palatable? This document is supported in part by a Preserve America grant administered by • Miraquelle spring? the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Reef U.S
    National Park Service Capitol Reef U.S. Department of the Interior Capitol Reef National Park Spring Canyon Spring Canyon is deep and narrow with towering Wingate cliffs and Navajo domes. It originates on the shoulder of Thousand Lakes Mountain and extends to the Fremont River. The route is marked with rock cairns and signs in some places, but many sections are unmarked and car- rying a topographic map and GPS unit is recommended. It is extremely hot in summer, and the only usually reliable water source is at the spring in Upper Spring Canyon, 1.5 miles (2.41 km) west of the junction with Chimney Rock Canyon. Use caution in narrow canyons particular- ly during the flash flood season (typically July–September). The canyon route is divided into Upper and Lower Spring Canyon sections. It can be accessed midway via Chimney Rock Canyon. The entire canyon is best done as a three- to four-day trip. Upper Spring Canyon is a good two- to three- day trip, while Lower Spring Canyon can be done as an overnight or long day hike. Backcountry permits are required for all overnight trips and can be obtained at the visitor center. Location of Trailheads 1. Upper end of Spring Canyon: Holt Draw, which is a dirt track on the right (north) side of Hwy 24, 0.9 miles (1.44 km) west of the park boundary and 7.2 miles (11.59 km) west of the visitor center. The road is closed to vehicle traf- fic beyond the gate at the forest service boundary near Hwy 24.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legendary Lore of the Holy Wells of England
    '? '/-'#'•'/ ' ^7 f CX*->C5CS- '^ OF CP^ 59§70^ l-SSi"-.". -,, 3 ,.. -SJi f, THE LEGENDARY LORE OF THE HOL Y WELLS OF ENGLAND. : THE LEGENDARY LORE ' t\Q OF THE ~ 1 T\ I Holy Wells of England: INCLUDING IRfpers, Xaftes, ^fountains, ant) Springs. COPIOUSLY ILLUSTRATED BY CURIOUS ORIGINAL WOODCUTS. ROBERT CHARLES HOPE, F.S.A., F.R.S.L., PETERHOUSE, CAMBRIDGE; LINCOLN'S INN; MEMBER,OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY, AUTHOR OF "a GLOSSARY OF DIALECTAL PLACE-NOMENCLATURE," " AN INVENTORY OF THE CHURCH PLATE IN RUTLAND," "ENGLISH GOLDSMITHS," " THE LEPER IN ENGLAND AND ENGLISH LAZAR-HOUSES ;" EDITOR OF BARNABE GOOGE'S " POPISH KINGDOME." LONDON ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C. 1893. PREFACE, THIS collection of traditionary lore connected with the Holy Wells, Rivers, Springs, and Lakes of England is the first systematic attempt made. It has been said there is no book in any language which treats of Holy Wells, except in a most fragmentary and discursive manner. It is hoped, therefore, that this may prove the foundation of an exhaustive work, at some future date, by a more competent hand. The subject is almost inexhaustible, and, at the same time, a most interesting one. There is probably no superstition of bygone days that has held the minds of men more tenaciously than that of well-worship in its broadest sense, "a worship simple and more dignified than a senseless crouching before idols." An honest endeavour has been made to render the work as accurate as possible, and to give the source of each account, where such could be ascertained.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of a Flood Pulsing Hydrology on Plants and Invertebrates in Riparian Wetlands
    IMPACTS OF A FLOOD PULSING HYDROLOGY ON PLANTS AND INVERTEBRATES IN RIPARIAN WETLANDS A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Maureen K. Drinkard August 2012 Dissertation written by Maureen K. Drinkard B.S., Kent State University, 2003 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2012 Approved by ___Ferenc de Szalay_, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee ___Mark Kershner_______, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee _____Oscar Rocha________, ____Mandy Munro-Stasiuk_, Accepted by _____James Blank______, Chair, Department of Biological Sciences ______Raymond Craig___, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................... x CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 Dissertation Goals ............................................................................................. 1 Definition of the Flood Pulse Concept .............................................................. 2 Ecological and economic importance ............................................................... 3 Impacts of environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Prevent Soil Erosion on Your Property
    How to Use Sandbags Filling Filling sandbags is best done with two people. Fill half full with sand if available or local soil. ������������ ���������� Stacking PREVENT SOIL EROSION Fold top of sandbag down and rest the bag on its top on the stack. Top should be facing upstream. Stamp the bag into place. Complete each layer before starting the next layer. Stagger the layers. Stack no more than three layers high unless they are ON YOUR ROPERTY against a building or stacked pyramid-style. P Sandbag diversion HOMEOWNER S GUIDE TO EROSION CONTROL ��������������� ������������� Sandbags will redirect water away from property but will not A ' �������������� ������������ seal out water. Place sandbags with the folded top toward the upstream or uphill direction. Sandbags are temporary and will deteriorate after several months. DO’S AND DON’TS Do: Don’t: • Contact your local Flood Control Agency or Public Works • Under-estimate the power of debris flows. Authority- Installing these erosion control devices on your property may not be sufficient to thwart extreme flows. • Walk or drive across swiftly flowing water. • Try to direct debris flows away from your property to a • Wait until storms arrive to make a plan. recognized drainage device or to the street. • Try to confine the flows more than is necessary. • Clear a path for debris. • Direct flow to neighbor’s property. • Place protective measures to divert debris, not dam it. • Board up windows facing the flow • Work with your neighbors. Don’t Forget to Plan for Erosion Control ALL YEAR ROUND In an effort to help landowners protect their Preventing runoff during the spring and summer is equally as Soil erosion can happen property, professional NRCS Conservationists important as preventing erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.1 Coarse Bed Load Sampling
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1997 The initiation of coarse bed load transport in gravel bed streams Andrew C. Whitaker The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Whitaker, Andrew C., "The initiation of coarse bed load transport in gravel bed streams" (1997). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10498. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10498 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire Offshore Wind LLC Empire Wind 1 Project Article VII
    Empire Offshore Wind LLC Empire Wind 1 Project Article VII Application Pre-Filed Direct Testimony June 2021 PRE-FILED DIRECT TESTIMONY Pre-filed direct testimony in support of the Article VII Application for the Empire Wind 1 Project is presented by witnesses by subject area, as follows: Witness Exhibit(s) Sponsored Laura Morales Exhibit 1: General Information Regarding Application Laura Morales, Nathalie Schils Exhibit 2: Location of Facilities Laura Morales, Joel Stadell, Exhibit 3: Alternatives Sabrina Hepburn Laura Morales, Joel Stadell, Exhibit 4: Environmental Impact Sabrina Hepburn, Robert Jacoby, Katherine Miller, June Mire, Ryan Earley Joel Stadell Exhibit 5: Design Drawings Julia Bovey, Geir Miskov, Joel Exhibit 6: Economic Effects of Proposed Facility Stadell Laura Morales, Joel Stadell, Exhibit 7: Local Ordinances Sabrina Hepburn Laura Morales, Nathalie Schils Exhibit 8: Other Pending Filings Geir Miskov, Joel Stadell Exhibit 9: Cost of Proposed Facility Joel Stadell Exhibit E-1: Description of Proposed Transmission Facility Joel Stadell Exhibit E-2: Other Facilities Joel Stadell Exhibit E-3: Underground Construction Georges Charles, Joel Stadell Exhibit E-4: Engineering Justification Laura Morales, Sabrina Hepburn Exhibit E-5: Effect on Communications Laura Morales, Sabrina Hepburn, Exhibit E-6: Effect on Transportation Joel Stadell, Ryan Earley Laura Morales, Erin Lincoln Appendix B: Sediment Transport Analysis Empire Wind 1 Project Pre-Filed Direct Testimony Article VII Application Witness Exhibit(s) Sponsored Laura Morales, Katherine Miller Appendix C: Coastal Zone Management Consistency Statement Julia Bovey Appendix D: Public Involvement Plan Laura Morales, June Mire Appendix E: Benthic Resource Characterization Reports Benjamin R.T. Cotts and William Appendix F: Electric- and Magnetic-Field Assessment H.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Characterization and Methods Used in the Investigation of Karst Hydrology
    Hydrogeologic Characterization and Methods Used in the Investigation of Karst Hydrology By Charles J. Taylor and Earl A. Greene Chapter 3 of Field Techniques for Estimating Water Fluxes Between Surface Water and Ground Water Edited by Donald O. Rosenberry and James W. LaBaugh Techniques and Methods 4–D2 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................................75 Hydrogeologic Characteristics of Karst ..........................................................................................77 Conduits and Springs .........................................................................................................................77 Karst Recharge....................................................................................................................................80 Karst Drainage Basins .......................................................................................................................81 Hydrogeologic Characterization ...............................................................................................................82 Area of the Karst Drainage Basin ....................................................................................................82 Allogenic Recharge and Conduit Carrying Capacity ....................................................................83 Matrix and Fracture System Hydraulic Conductivity ....................................................................83
    [Show full text]