SUMMARY of 190Th MEETING of SRC-NCTE

Minutes-206th Meeting of SRC 09-10 June 2010

SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE BANGALORE

Minutes of the 206th Meeting of SRC held at the Conference Hall of NCTE, Bangalore on 9th & 10TH June, 2011

The following members attended the Meeting:-

1. Prof. C. Thangamuthu - Chairman

2. Prof. C.L. Anand - Member

3. Prof.C.Seshadri - Memer

4. Prof. P.J. Poulose - Member

5. Prof. C.H. Vijayalaxmi - Member

6. Famida Rahim (Karnataka) - Representative

7. Sri. Gangadharaiah - Convenor

The following members could not attend the Meeting :-

Prof. Syeda Akthar, Member, Prof. V.Sudhakar. Member & Representatives of the Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Tamilnadu and U.T’s of Lakshadweep, Pondicherry & Andaman & Nicobar Islands

MINUTES OF 206 th MEETING OF SRC-NCTE 1 1

(Gangadharaiah) (Prof. C. Thangamuthu) Regional Director, SRC, NCTE Chairman, SRC, NCTE Minutes-206th Meeting of SRC 09-10 June 2010

Sl. Brief Description Remarks of SRC No.

1. Confirmation of Minutes of 205th Confirmed Meeting held on 18th-19th May 2011 2. Action Taken Report (ATR) on Noted the Minutes of 204th Meeting of SRC held on 27th-28th April 2011

Inspection Report – Shifting Case:

Sl. Code Remarks of SRC No Course Name of the Instituti on State 3. APS00680 St. Peter Training College, Kolencherry P.O, Ernakulam District, Kerala made B.Ed an application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore on 30.12.2002 St. Peters Training The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team College, as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering Ernakula B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 23.02.2005. m KL The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises)

The institution in its letter dated 28.12.2008 has submitted proposal for shifting the B.Ed course to the new location.

Consent letter was issued to the institution on 19.01.2011 Accordingly inspection of the institution was carried on 07.02.2011

The shifting fee of Rs. 40000/- is not submitted by the institution. The inspection was done on 07/02/2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:  Land documents are in individual’s Name and not in the Name of the Society/Trust/Institution as per NCTE Norms. In the sale submitted by the institution land is in individual name of Mr. Geevarghese Kathanar; in Sy.no.600/9 for the extent of 2 Acres & 31 cents. Land has to be in the 2 1

name of the college/trust on the date of application as per regulations.

 The management is also running a Higher Secondary School in the same building. This is against the NCTE norms.

 As per VCD observation, the building is roofed with AC sheets.

 Building completion certificate from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted.

 Land usage certificate from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted.

 Multi purpose hall size is 988 sq.ft. which is less than the requirement of Regulation 2009.

 Bye-Laws of the Society are to be submitted by the management.

 An Affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper in the prescribed format with notary attestation is to be submitted.

 In the building plan submitted Sy.no., Plot no, total land area and built up area not mentioned.

 Non- Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government Authorised person / Authority is to be submitted.

 Salary is not paid as per State Govt/UGC norms. The institution has not given the facility of CPF/PPF to the staff members.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

4. APS0266 Hindi Shikshak Prashikshan Mahavidhyalay, Karimnagar District, Andhra HPT Pradesh was granted recognition for offering H.P.T Course with an intake of Hindi 60 students vide order dated 17.09.2001. Shiksha The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift k to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case Prashish the course started in rented premises) an Mahavid The institution in its letter dated 28.12.2008 has submitted proposal for shifting the yalaya, H.P.T course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-630787 dated

Karimna 24.06.2009 gar Intimation letter for shifting inspection was issued to the institution on 25.01.2011. AP Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 08.02.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 As per the records submitted by the management, the land is on a private lease deed for 30 years in individual name executed on 19.03.2008, and private lease in the individual name is not acceptable, and against the norms of NCTE.

 As per BCC report, 713.33 sq.mts of the building is roofed with AC sheets.

 The Affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper in the prescribed format with notary attestation is to be submitted.

 The institute has not submitted the Land usage certificate from a competent Govt. authority.

 FDRs for Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund respectively in joint account from a Nationalised Bank is to be submitted.

 Other labs/Physical Education is not available.

 Salaries are paid in cash instead of through Bank.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 5. APS00223 Manasa College of Education, Wanarpathy Revenue Division, Saka Balanarayana B.Ed Educational Society, Kothakota, Mahabubnagar-509381, Andhra Pradesh. Manasa College Manasa College of Education, Wanarpathy Revenue Division, Saka Balanarayana of Educational Society, Kothakota, Mahabubnagar-509381, Andhra Pradesh. Educatio submitted application on 31.12.2001. The institution was granted recognition for n, offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 04.04.2003. Mahabu bnagar The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift

AP to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises) The management is running D.Ed course also in the same building. The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 09.10.2009 along with Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No. 15024 dated 15.10.2009 towards inspection fee for shifting of premises. The shifting inspection was done on 08.02.2011. The management is also running D.Ed programme in the same building.

 Land documents are in individual’s Name and not in the Name of the Society/Trust/Institution. It is not acceptable as per NCTE Norms..

 Land documents submitted in English version in the name of the trust/institution is to be submitted.

 In the Encumbrance certificate submitted by the institution land is in individual name for Sy.No. 193/A/B/C, 194/A/B.Ed, Village Amadabakula.

 From photograph it is clear that the building is incomplete and still under construction.

 VCD is not working, fresh VCD is to be submitted.

 In the Affidavit submitted, the built up area is not mentioned.

 Education Technology lab & Other lab/Physical Education is to be strengthened.

 Consolidated salaries being paid to the staff instead of as per pay scales of State Govt/Central/UGC.  In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to both the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 6. APS00305 Sharada College of Education, P.No-88,88/2&88/3, Seshadrinagar, B.Ed Mahabubnagar-509001, Andhra Pradesh. Sharada College Sharada College of Education, P.No-88,88/2&88/3, Seshadrinagar, Mahabubnagar- of 509001, Andhra Pradesh. has submitted application on 31.12.2001. The institution 5 1

Educatio was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide n, order dated 16.10.2003. Mahabu bnagar The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift AP to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises) The management is running D.Ed course also in the same building. The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 14.09.2009 along with Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No. 14979 dated 29.09.2009 towards inspection fee for shifting of premises. The shifting inspection was done on 05.02.2011.

 As per VT report, total earmarked built up area for B.Ed & D.Ed is 2583 sq.mts. which is inadequate for both the course, as per NCTE norms.

 As seen from VCD, the management is also running a School in the same building.

 The Plot number 6-73 mentioned in Affidavit is not matching with sale deed.

 In the building plan submitted, the built up area is not mentioned.

 Building completion certified from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted in the prescribed format.

 The institute has not submitted the Land usage certificate from a competent Govt. approved authority.  Non- Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government authorised person / Authority is to be submitted.  Science lab, Psychology lab & Other lab/Physical Education needs to be strengthened.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 7. APS00535 Sri Seva Nagaiah Memorial College of Teacher Education, Krishna District, B.Ed Andhra Pradesh made an application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Sri Seva Bangalore on 10.12.1998.

Nagaiah Memoria The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team l as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering Teacher B.Ed course with an intake of 90 students vide order dated 07.09.2000. College of The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift Educatio to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case n, the course started in rented premises) Krishna AP The institution in its letter dated 10.11.2009 has submitted proposal for shifting the B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-634986 dated 10.12.2009.

Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 09.02.2011.

The management is also running D.Ed course in the same building.

 The management is also running in the same campus/building a Model School & an Engineering College, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

 Building completion certified from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted.

 The institute has not submitted the Land usage certificate from a competent Govt. approved authority.

 Non-Encumbrance certificate from the competent authority is not submitted.

 FDR for Rs. 5 lacs towards Endowment fund from a Nationalised Bank in joint account is to be submitted.

 Education Technology lab needs to be strengthened.

 Salary to the staff is paid by cash instead through Cheque/Bank.

 No furniture in seminar hall.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to both the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the

matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 8. APS00213 Vasavi Educational Society, Vinukonda B.Ed College, No-24-181, Jakkavari B.Ed Street, Vinukonda-522647, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh made an Vinukonda application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore on 31.12.2001 B.Ed College, The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team Guntur as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering AP B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 27.02.2003. The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises) The institution in its letter dated 09.07.2009 has submitted proposal for shifting the B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-314423 dated 17.07.2009. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 09.02.2011

 As seen from VCD, the building is still under construction and is incomplete.

 In the Affidavit submitted, the built up area is not mentioned.

 In the building plan submitted, the built up area is not mentioned.

 Language Leaning lab is not available.  Other lab / Physical education needs to be strengthened.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 9. APS01311 Mother Theresa College of Education, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. B.Ed made an application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore on 31.12.2001 Mother The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team Theresa as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering College B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 20.02.2004. of The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift Educatio to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case n for the course started in rented premises) 8 1

Women, The institution in its letter dated 25.06.2009 has submitted proposal for shifting the Kurnool B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-367781 dated AP 26.06.2009. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 11.02.2011

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:  As seen from VCD, the management is also running a School in the same building in which B.Ed course is conducted.

 The management is running D.Ed course for 50 students, without the approval of NCTE. This is a serious violation which would attract dis qualification of the students who pass out of this programme.

 Building completion certified from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted.

 As per VT report, the infrastructural facilities like furniture is insufficient.

 Salary to the staff is paid by Cash instead through Cheque.

 Other Lab/Physical Education facilities needs to be strengthened.

 The number of Library Books in the lab is inadequate. In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to both the course of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 10. APS00043 MNR Teacher Education College, Bachupally Village, Qutubullapur Mandaol, B.Ed Rangareddy-500072, Andhra Pradesh. M.N.R. MNR Teacher Education College, Bachupally Village, Qutubullapur Mandaol, Teacher Rangareddy-500072, Andhra Pradesh, submitted application on 01.01.2001. The Educatio institution was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 n students vide order dated 06.02.2002. College, Hyderab The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift ad to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case AP the course started in rented premises) 9 1

The management is also running M.Ed and D.Ed programme in the same building.

The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 25.06.2009 along with Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No. 14903 dated 26.06.2009 towards inspection fee for shifting of premises.

Shifting inspection was done on 11.02.2011.

The management is also running D.Ed and M.Ed in the same building.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice to all the courses under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 The total Built up area earmarked for the B.Ed is only 1578 sq.ft. which is grossly inadequate as per NCTE norms. The same is also corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management representative in the essential data. As per NCTE norms total built up area required for B.Ed. is 16000 sq.ft.

 As seen from VCD, the management is running the B.Ed programme in the multistoried building having Ground floor and four floors, running Arts and Science College also, which is against the NCTE norms.

 The survey number 197, 200 in land documents and Sy.nos. in Building plan is not matching, which may be explained.

 Building completion certified from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted.  The institute has not submitted the Land usage certificate from a competent Govt. approved authority.

 Details of FDR’s for each course is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the (3) courses of the institution including M.Ed & D.Ed, as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 11. APS00204 Mother Theresa Memorial Educaional Society, St. Peter & GhattaManeni B.Ed Krishna College of Education, Tenali Revenue Division, Burripalem, Guntur

St. Peter & District, Andhra Pradesh has made an application for B.Ed course to SRC, Ghattam NCTE, Bangalore on 31.12.2001 aneni Krishna The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team College as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering of B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order no-6708 dated 04.04.2003. Educatio n, The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift Guntur to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case AP the course started in rented premises)

The institution in its letter dated 24.09.2007 has submitted proposal for shifting the B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-482626 dated 27.09.2007. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 11.02.2011

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice to all the courses under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 The details of the other programmes run by the management in the same building/premises are to be submitted.

 Psychology lab & Other lab/Physical Education needs to be strengthened.

 Language learning lab is not available.

 The inspection was conducted at Burripalem, whereas all the land documents are related to Nelapadu village. This should be explained.

 Staff salaries are paid in cash instead of through Bank. In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution, as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 12. APS00187 Kothmasu Chandrakala & B. Venkateshwarlu HPT College, Nelapadu, Tenali HPT P.O-522201, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. was granted recognition for Kothamasu offering HPT course with an intake of 60 students vide order dated 18.06.2002. Chandra The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift kala & B. to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case Venkate the course started in rented premises) shwarlu HPT The institution in its letter dated 25.09.2007 has submitted proposal for shifting the College, H.P.T course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-353057 dated 11 1

Guntur 08.09.2007. AP Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 12.02.2011

 The total Built up area earmarked for the H.P.T is 12800 sq.ft. which is inadequate as per NCTE norms. The same is also corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management representative in the essential data. As per NCTE norms total built up area required for H.P.T is 16000 sq.ft.

 Details of the other programme/courses run by the management in the same building/premises is to be submitted.

 As seen from VCD, the building is not suitable for education purpose, appears to be an Hostel.

 The multipurpose hall size is 625 sq.ft. which is less than the requireemtn of NCTE regulations

 Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs. 100/- stamp paper duly attested by Oath Commissioner or Notary Public is to be submitted.

 Approved building plan by the competent civil authority is to be submitted.

 FDRs for Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a Nationalised Bank in joint account is to be submitted.

 Other lab/Physical Education facilities needs to be strengthened.

 Salary is paid by cash instead through Cheque/Bank.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 13. APS00386 Sri Karibandi Subbarao Memorial College of Education, Kovvur Revenue 12 1

B.Ed Division, Tadipudi, West Godavari-534341, Andhra Pradesh. has submitted Sri Karibandi application on 31.12.2001. The institution was granted recognition for offering B.Ed Subbara course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 03.03.2003. o The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift Memoria to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case l College the course started in rented premises) of Educatio The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 19.09.2007 along with n, West Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No. 13141 dated 27.09.2007 towards inspection fee for Godavar shifting of premises. i The management is also running D.Ed course in the same building. AP The shifting inspection of the institution was done on 29.03.2011.

 The total built up area as per VT report for both B.Ed & D.Ed programme is 2749.19 Sq.mts. which is inadequate. As per the NCTE norms, 32000 Sq.mts. built up area is required for both B.Ed and D.Ed course.

 As seen from VCD, the management is running the T.Ed programme in the multistoryed building, which is a part of a some other educational complex. The ground floor is used for non-teacherg education programme, which is against the NCTE norms.

 Building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is to be submitted.  In the building plan submitted, the Sy.no. is not mentioned.

 FDRs for Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a Nationalised Bank in joint account for each course is to be submitted.

 Salaries are paid in cash instead of through Bank.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to both the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 14. APS0706 Akula Gopayya College of Education, Sri Gowthama Buddha Minorities B.Ed Educational Society, Prathipadu, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari-534101, Akula Andhra Pradesh. has submitted application on 30.12.2002. The institution was Gopayya granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide

College order dated 10.09.2003. of The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift Educatio to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case n, West the course started in rented premises) Godavar i The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 28.12.2007 along with AP Rs.40,000/- vide Receipt No. 13794 dated 07.02.2008 towards inspection fee for shifting of premises. Now, visit is being organized to verify the infrastructural and instructional facilities available at the new premises.

The shifting inspection of the institution was done on 31.03.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice to all the courses, under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 As seen from VCD, the roof of the building is covered with Asbestos sheets and the building is incomplete.

 The details of the other programmes run by the management in the same building/campus along with the existing course is to be submitted.

 Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs. 100/- stamp paper duly attested by Oath Commissioner or Notary Public is to be submitted.

 In the building plan submitted, the built up area. is not clearly mentioned.

 In the building completion certificate, the total area is not mentioned.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the course of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 15. APS04032 D.T.Ed Ponmari Teacher Training Institute, Pudukottai District, Tamilnadu Ponmari Ponmari Teacher Training Institute, Tamilnadu submitted application for granted of Teacher recognition to D.T.Ed course on 31.12.2004. Training

Institute, The application was processed and recognition was granted for offering D.T.Ed Pudukott course with an intake of 50 students on 22.12.2005 at No.4, New Street, ai Thirukkokaram, Pudukottai-622002, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own TN premises within 3 years.

SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20-21st August 2009 where in it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for further action.

Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 16.09.2009 giving 10 days to submit reply. The institution has submitted its written representation alongwith DD of Rs.40000/- towards inspection fee on 17.11.2009 for shifting of premises at Pommadimalai, Narthamalai post, Via Annavasal, Pudukottai District-622101, Tamilnadu

The management is also running D.T.Ed-Al and B.Ed programme.

Accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 18th-23rd April 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 11.04.2011. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was conducted on 03.05.2011.

 The land documents are in individual name and not in the name of Society/Trust/Institution. Which is against NCTE norms.

 As per VT report the total built up area earmarked for all the three (D.T.Ed, D.T.Ed-al & B,Ed) Teacher Education Programme is 16862 sq.ft. which is inadequate as per NCTE norms.

 As seem from VCD, the institution is located in a a school complex in which a primary School and a Matriculation School are also being run, which is against the NCTE regulations.

 In the building plan submitted, the built up area. is not mentioned.

 Consolidated salary is paid to the staff, not as per Central/State Govt./UGC guidelines.

 Details of FDR’s of 5 lacs and 3 lacs is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the three courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

16. APS04515 Sarada Ramakrishna College of Education, Thiruvannamalai District, B.Ed Tamilnadu Sarada Ramakri Sarada Ramakrishna College of Education, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu shna submitted application for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course on College 09.12.2005. of Educatio The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the institution n, on 06.10.2006 at No.321/15, Melmaruvathur Road, Virudur Village, Vandavasi Thiruvan Taluk, Thiruvannamalai, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 namalai years. TN Meanwhile as per decision of SRC in its 175th meeting held on 13th-14th May 2009, the office of SRC has reviewed the files of the institution who have been granted recognition either in a rented premises pending construction of own building or in lease premises. A list of such institutions has been prepared and placed before SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20th-21st August 2009 wherein, it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for further action.

Accordingly a notice was issued to the institution on 11.09.2010 to submit following documents. The institution submitted its reply on 30.10.2010 alongwith RS.40000/- & photocopies of certain documents.

The institution vide letter dated 01.10.2009 submitted Rs.40000/- for shifting of premises.

 The total Built up area earmarked for the B.Ed(APS04515) and other courses Viz; another B.Ed (APS08711), D.T.Ed (APS03597) & D.T.Ed-Al (APS04935) is only 20838 sq.ft. which is grossly inadequate as per NCTE norms. The same is also corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management representative in the essential data.

 As seem from VCD, a school is also run in the same building along with the 16 1

Teacher Education course, which is against the NCTE regulations.

 In the Affidavit submitted, the total built up area is not mentioned.

 Building completion certificate from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted.

 Salary is paid to the staff not as per Central/State Govt./UGC guidelines.

 Details of the FDR’s of Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs for each course is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the course of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

17. APS00915 D.T.Ed SBG Teacher Training Institute, Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu SBG Teacher SBG Teacher Training Institute, Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu submitted Training application for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed course on 31.12.2002. Institute, Cuddalo The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the institution re on 12.01.2005 with 50 intake at Thenpathy Colony Road, Srimushnam, Cuddalore- TN 608703, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide letter dated 04.02.2010 submitted Rs.40000/- for shifting of premises at Nangavaram Road, Perugamani, Trichy District, Tamilnadu. The proposal for shifting of premises of SBG Teacher Training Institute, Trichy was misplaced in SBG Teacher Training Institute, Cuddalore file. The same was considered and accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 11th- 15th April 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 06.04.2011. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was conducted on 04.05.2011. But inspection of SBG Teacher Training Institute, Trichy to be carried out.

Inspection for SBG College of Education, Trichy for B.Ed course was conducted for shifting of premises on 22.04.2010. SRC considered the VT report in its 205th meeting held on 18th-19th May 2011 and decided to issue show cause notice.

The management is also running B.Ed and D.T.Ed-Al course in the same building.

 The total Built up area earmarked for the D.T.Ed(APS00915) and other courses Viz; B.Ed (APS08711), D.T.Ed (APS03597) & D.T.Ed-Al (APS04935) is only 20838 sq.ft. which is grossly inadequate as per NCTE norms. The same is also corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management representative in the essential data.

 As seem from VCD, a school is also run in the same building along with the existing course, which is against the NCTE regulations.

 In the Affidavit submitted, the total built up area is not mentioned.

 Building completion certificate in the proper format from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted.

 Salary is paid to the staff not through Cheque and not as per Central/State Govt./UGC guidelines.

 Details of the earmarked Built up area for each course is to be given.

18. APS03648 Sree Arumugam Teacher Training Institute, Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu APS06154 D.T.Ed Arumuga Mudaliyar Sornam Educational Trust, Cuddalore submitted an application D.T.Ed-AI in the name and style of Sree Arumugam Teacher Training Institute for seeking Sree grant of recognition for D.T.Ed course. Arumug am The application was processed and the inspection of the institution was carried out Teacher on 14.09.2005. Recognition order to was issued to the institution on 27.12.2005 for Training D.T.Ed course and D.T.Ed-AI on 24.10.2006 at Sree Arumugam Teacher Training 18 1

Institute, Institute, Raja Nagar, Vaithiyanathzapuram, Tholudur, Cuddalore, Tamilnadu with Cuddalo the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years. re TN The institution vide letter dated 20.01.2010 submitted for a proposal for change of premises alongwith Rs.40000/-

The management is also running B.Ed course in the same building.

Accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 11 th-15th April 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 06.04.2011. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was conducted on 03.05.2011.

 As seem from VCD, a school and other educational programmes are also run in the same building/campus along with the existing courses. Which is against the NCTE regulations.

 Detaials of FDR’s for each course is to be submitted.

19. APS06084 Sri Renga Teacher Training Institute, Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu APS07962 D.T.Ed Sri Renga Teacher Training Institute, Cuddalore, Tamilnadu submitted application D.T.Ed-AI for granted of recognition to D.T.Ed course on 02.01.2006. Sri Renga Teacher The application was processed and recognition was granted for offering D.T.Ed Training course with an intake of 50 students on 24.10.2006 at New Street, Manaledu, Institute, Tittagudi-606106, Cuddalore, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises Cuddalo within 3 years. re TN The institution was also granted recognition for D.T.Ed-AI on 30.11.2007 at 19 1

Vaidhyanadhapuram, Manalmedu, Tittakudi-606106, Cuddalore, Tamilnadu with additional intake of 50.

The institution has submitted its written representation alongwith DD of Rs.40000/- towards inspection fee on 27.01.2010 for shifting of premises at Raja Nagar, Vaithiyanathapuram, Tholudur-606303, Cuddalore District Tamilnadu

Accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 11th-15th April 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 06.04.2011. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was conducted on 05.05.2011.

 In building plan total area of the land is not mentioned.

 The teacher education programme/courses are located in the Arts and Science College building, which is against NCTE norms.

 In the building plan the total built up area is not mentioned.

20. APS05705 Lakshmi Ammal Teacher Training Institute, Tiruvannamalai District, D.T.Ed Tamilnadu Lakshmi Ammal Lakshmi Ammal Teacher Training Institute, Thiruvannamalai District, Teacher Tamilnadu submitted application for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed Training course on 02.01.2006. Institute, Thiruvan The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the institution namalai on 13.11.2006 at Sirunathur Village, Tindivanam, Thiruvannmalai-604601, 20 1

TN Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dated 27.10.2010 submitted Rs.40000/- for shifting of premises

The management is also running B.Ed course in the same building/premises.

Accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 18th-23rd April 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 11.04.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 05.05.2011.

 The total Built up area earmarked for the D.T.Ed(APS05705) and other course ( B.Ed-APS09692) is only 16881 sq.ft, which is grossly inadequate as per NCTE norms. The same is also corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management representative in the essential data

 In the Affidavit submitted, total built up area is not mentioned.

 Psychology lab & Education Technology lab, needs to be strengthened.

21. APS05167 R.K. Samy College of Education, Ramanathapuram District, Tamilnadu B.Ed R.K. Samy R.K. Samy College of Education, Ramanathapuram District, Tamilnadu College submitted application for granted of recognition to B.Ed course on of 02.01.2006. Educatio n, The application was processed and recognition was granted for Ramana offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students on 05.10.2006 at thapura No.1/780, Bharathi Nagar, Ramanathapuram-623503, Tamilnadu with the m condition to shift to own premises within 3 years. TN 21 1

Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 14.09.2009 giving 10 days to submit reply. The institution has submitted its written representation alongwith DD of Rs.40000/- towards inspection fee on 01.10.2009 for shifting of premises at Seyyalur, Ettivayal Post, Via Chathirakudi, Ramanathapuram-623527, Tamilnadu.

The management is also running D.T.Ed course in the same building.

 As per VT report, the total built up area earmarked for the B.Ed (APS05167) is 16000 sq.ft & for D.T.Ed is 12000 sq.ft together it is 28000 sq.ft. But as per Building Completion Certificate it is clearly mentioned as 25416 sq.ft. which is inadequate as per NCTE norms. This discrepancy may be explained.

 Non-Encumbrance certificate from the competent authority in English version is not submitted.

 Psychology lab and Language learning lab needs to be strengthened.

22. APS05785 R.K. Samy Teacher Training Institute, Ramanathapuram District, Tamilnadu D.T.Ed R.K. Samy R.K. Samy Teacher Training Institute, Ramanathapuram District, Tamilnadu Teacher submitted application for granted of recognition to B.Ed course on Training 02.01.2006. Institute, Ramana The application was processed and recognition was granted for thapura offering D.T.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on 26.10.2006 at m No.1/780, Bharathi Nagar, Ramanathapuram-623503, Tamilnadu with the 22 1

TN condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 14.09.2009 giving 10 days to submit reply. The institution has submitted its written representation alongwith DD of Rs.40000/- towards inspection fee on 01.10.2009 for shifting of premises at Seyyalur, Ettivayal Post, Via Chathirakudi, Ramanathapuram-623527, Tamilnadu.

The management is also running B.Ed course in the same building.

 As per VT report, the total built up area earmarked for the B.Ed (APS05167) is 16000 sq.ft & for D.T.Ed is 12000 sq.ft together it is 28000 sq.ft. But as per Building Completion Certificate it is clearly mentioned as 25416 sq.ft. which is inadequate as per NCTE norms. This discrepancy may be explained.

 Non-Encumbrance certificate from the competent authority in English version is not submitted.

 Psychology lab and Language learning lab needs to be strengthened.

23. APS04868 KEC College of Education, Tiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu B.Ed KEC College KEC College of Education, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu submitted of application for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 30.12.2005. Educatio n, The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the institution Thiruvan on 23.12.2006 at No.10, Kanchi Road, Vengikal, Thiruvannmalai-606604, 23 1

namalai Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years. TN The institution vide its letter dated 01.10.2009 submitted Rs.40000/- for shifting of premises at Tindivanam Road, Chinnakangeyanur Village, Tiruvannamalai- 606611, Tamilnadu

The management is also running D.Ed(two units) in the same building.

 As per VT report, the total built up area earmarked for the B.Ed (APS04868), D.T.Ed (APS08091) & D.T.Ed-Al (APS04968).is 26148 sq.ft. which is inadequate as per NCTE norms.

 The details of other progrmames being run in the same building/campus be furnished.

 Building completion certificate in a proper format approved by the competent Govt. authority is to be submitted .

 Education Technology needs to be strengthened.

 Details of FDR’s for each course is to be submitted.

24. APS01422 Supa Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu D.T.Ed D.T.Ed-AI Supa Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri submitted an application for grant of Supa recognition for D.T.Ed course.

Teacher Training The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the institution Institute, on 28.10.2004 for D.T.Ed & D.T.Ed-AI on 25.08.2005 at Supa Teacher Training Dharma Institute, No.7-A, Venkata Sharma Road, Dharmapuri-636701, Tamilnadu with the puri condition to shift to own premises within 3 years. TN The institution vide letter dated 29.10.2008 submitted Rs.40000/- towards shifting fee. A letter was issued on 12.06.2009 to the institution calling for documents to examine the proposal for shifting of premises. The institution submitted its reply on 06.07.2009.

The inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was carried out on 22.10.2010. The Committee in its 198th meeting held on 24th-26th November 2010 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following. Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 03.01.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 25.01.2011

The committee in its 201st meeting held on 22nd-23rd February 2011 considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite re- inspection for all courses, along with the payment of inspection fee of Rs.40,000/- and submission of Building Completion Certificate from competent Government Engineer in the prescribed format. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 21.03.2011 to submit the above documents.

Meanwhile the Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai- 600006 forwarded a copy of inspection report of the institutions conducted by Principal, District Institute of Education and Training. As per the Reports of inspection of the institution conducted by Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai, the committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 decided to issue show cause notices. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.04.2011 for the folloiwng:

 The institute is not functioning in the address mentioned in the NCTE recognition order as well as staff approval order. Now the institute is functioning in 21-21-F- 7.E.B. Colony Bharathipuram, Dharmapuri – 636 705 in a residential house.  The entrance and the main gate of the institute are very narrow and small. The classrooms of the institution are very narrow which are having 10’ x 30’ area. They are not having proper ventilation facilities.  The institution has no playgrounds for conducting games activities.  The institute has no proper toilet facilities and no proper drinking water facilities for the students. The institute is functioning only in a congested place.  The management of the institute has not fulfilled the conditions as stipulated in the SRC, NCTE recognition order. The management of the institute has not follow the Regulations, Norms and standards of the SRC, NCTE.

Reply from the institution is not received so far.

Shifting Re-inspection fee is not submitted by the institution.

Accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 11th-16th April 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 11.04.2011. Accordingly shifting Re- inspection of the institution was conducted on 09.05.2011.

 As seen from VCD, the management is running other programmes in the same building/campus along with the existing course. The management has shifted to the new building, which is incomplete and construction is still underway.

 The land is on a private lease deed in favour of Mr. I.S Asoka Kumar, Chairman of SUPA Educational & Charitable Trust at Sy. No. 201/1C, 201/2C, 201/1B, 424/2B1, 424/2B2, 425/2. Private lease deed in individual’s name is against NCTE norms.

 Building completion certificate in a proper format approved by the competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted .

 Education Technology needs to be strengthened.

25. APS03521 AMG College of Education, G.T Road, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District, Andhra B.Ed Pradesh was granted recognition for offering B.Ed Course with an intake of AMG College 60 students vide order dated 07.02.2007 recognition granted by NCTE HQrs of Educatio The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift n, to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case Guntur the course started in rented premises) AP The institution in its letter dated 04.09.2007 has submitted proposal for shifting the 26 1

B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-192567 dated 27.08.2007 Consent letter was issued to the institution on 27.01.2011 Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 08.02.2011

 As seen from VCD, The management is running the institution in the building along with a Degree College and P.U.College and a School in the same building/campus. which is against the NCTE norms.

 In the building plan Khasra no./plot no, not mentioned, the survey no. mentioned in Building Completion Certificate is not matching with land documents.  Approved building plan from Govt. authority is to be submitted.

 Psychology lab & Other labs/Physical Education needs to be strengthened.

26. APS00253 Browns College of Education, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh has made B.Ed an application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore on 31.12.2001 Browns College The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team of as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering Educatio B.Ed course with an intake of 120 students vide order no-6100 dated 28.02.2003 n, Khamma The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift m to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case AP the course started in rented premises)

The institution in its letter dated 22.10.2007 has submitted proposal for shifting the B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-491013 dated 16.10.2007. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 11.02.2011 The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice to all the courses, under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 As per VT report, the total area earmarked for B.Ed, D.Ed & M.Ed is 31120 sq.fts,s, which is grossly inadequate for running all the three courses; as per the NCTE norms and the total built-up area required is a minimum of 3500 sq.meters.

 The details of other programmes run in the same building/campus along with the existing course be furnished.

 Building completion certificate in a proper format approved by the competent Govt. authority is to be submitted .

 In the building plan submitted, the Sy.nos. are not mentioned.

 Science lab & Other labs/Physical Education facilities needs to be strengthened.

27. APS00272 Crescent College of Education, D.No-2-8-275, Crescent Educational Complex, B.Ed Mukarampura, Karimnagar Dist, Andhra Pradesh. has made an application for Crescent B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore on 31.12.2001 College of The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team Educatio as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering n, B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 27.05.2003.

Karimna The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift gar to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case AP the course started in rented premises)

The institution in its letter dated 01.10.2009 has submitted proposal for shifting the B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-318575 dated 17.09.2009. The management is also running D.Ed course in the same building. Accordingly Shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 12.02.2011 The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice to all the courses, under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 As per VT report, the total area earmarked for B.Ed & D.Ed is 2630 sq.mts, which is grossly inadequate for running all the two courses; as per the NCTE norms, the total built-up area requirement is a minimum of 3000 sq.meters.

 VCD is not available

 The land is on private lease deed in individual name, which is not in accordance with NCTE regulations. As on date, the institution has not shifted to own land.

 Details of the other programmes run by the management in the same building be submitted.

 Approved building plan from Govt. authority is to be submitted.

 The Khasara No.2-8-323 as indicated in land documents is not matching with the Building Completion Certificate, affidavit and building plan. Building plan is for Sy.No. 2-8-275 and also not approved by the competent authority.

28. APS01306 St. peters College of Education, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh has made an B.Ed application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore on 08.01.2002 St,.Peters College The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team of as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering Educatio B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order no-1473 dated 24.03.2005. n, Kurnool The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift AP to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises) The institution submitted proposal for shifting of premises on 03.08.2009 Consent letter was issued to the institution on 25.01.2011. The institution has not submitted shifting fee of Rs. 40000/-. Accordingly shifting inspection of the institution was carried on 12.02.2011 The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice to all the courses, under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 As seen from VCD, the building is still under construction.

Inspection Report – Sec 13, 14 & 17 ( Vol-3)

29. SRCAPP278 Sub:- Mesco College of Education, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh B.Ed submitted an application to SRC-NCTE for grant of recognition for Mesco B.P.Ed course on 06.10.10 College of The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to Educatio State Government for recommendation on 09.11.2010/02.02.2011 A n, deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 10.12.2011 for the Hyderab following Points: ad AP  Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Endowment funds- the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds vide no 1244114 dated 21.08.2007 for five years issued by Bank of India. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original as per regulation.  Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund vide no 0184914 dated 21.08.2001 for five year issued by State Bank of Hyderabad. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original as per regulation  Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority :- The institution has submitted photocopy of the Sale Deed, but not certified by the competent authority. Hence, the institution is required to submit certified copy of the Land Documents issued by the Office of the Registrar or competent issuing authority  Approved building plan by the competent civil authority :- Institution has submitted building plan approved but not approved by civil authority. If the institution has running other teacher education courses/ other technical courses in the same premises then, the institution shall submit earmarked area for proposed course with total area and built up area.

 Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has not submitted land use certificate . Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of CLU (Agriculture lands -conversion of Non - Agricultural purpose) issued by Revenue Department  Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs 100/- stamp paper duly attested by Oath Commissioner or Notary Public, Stating the precise location of the land (village, district, state etc) the total area in possession, the permission of the competent authority to use the land for educational purposes and mode of possession i.e. 31 1

ownership or lease. The institution has submitted the affidavit of Rs 100/- stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or Notary public but the affidavit is incomplete (Point No.5). Hence the institution is required to submit original affidavit of Rs100/- stamp paper with complete details.  Minority Certificate:- the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in the name of college. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority  Building completion certificate:- The institution has not submitted building completion certificate in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to Building completion certificate in prescribed format. ( copy enclosed). The inspection of the institution was conducted on 31.03.2011. The following deficiencies still persist: The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice for the following:  The institute has not submitted the Land usage certificate from a competent Govt. approved authority.  S.R. No 5 is not filled properly in Affidavit of Rs. 100/-

 Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority is not submitted.  In the building plan, Khasra number is not mentioned and management has to submit the building plan approved by competent authority.  Fresh FDRs for Rs. 5 lacs and Rs, 3 lacs from the Nationalised Bank is to be submitted.  Duly filled in questionnaire is not submitted.  A Certificate from the Government Affiliating body to the effect that no other programme is being run by the institution in the same building / Campus, along with the proposed Course B.Ed to be submitted.  The institution has not submitted valid Minority Status Certificate from the Competent Authority. In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal of 32 1

recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice. SCN was issued on 25.05.2011. Meanwhile from the perusal of the file of the institution it is found that institution has submitted online application on 28.09.10 for B.El.Ed Course but the SRC office has processed the file for B.Ed course inadvertently. Hence the matter is placed before SRC for rectification from B.Ed to B.El.Ed course.

The committee has noted the points and decided that the visit was inadvertently conducted for B.Ed programme, while the application was for B.El.Ed programme. As the norms for B.El.Ed are yet to be specified by the NCTE Hqrs. The request could not be considered and hence the application is rejected. 30. APS09645 An application was submitted by Sree Vidya Educational Society, Medak, Andhra D.Ed Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Sree Vidya Bangalore vide dated 27.10.2008. Sai D.Ed College, The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations Medak of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to AP further recognise/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s). The SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13 January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.

A letter dated 07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the State of Andhra Pradesh as the above colleges are exceeding in numbers than required.

A letter dated 17.03.2009 has been received from NCTE, Hqrs informing that the “The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been decided that no further Recognition/ Permission to any institution in the State of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-2010 for B.Ed, D.Ed, and Physical Education courses also”.

The State Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of this institution. The letters dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 was considered by SRC in its 172nd Meeting held on 25-26 March, 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Training Institutions in the State of Andhra

Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to close the applications.

As per the decision of SRC the application was closed on 22.04.2009.

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.27913 of 2010 without approached to appellate authority.

Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 10.11.2010 vide W.P.No. 27913 of 2010 reads as hereunder:

“ It may be true that the State Government as well as the first respondent have reviewed the situation as to the necessary or otherwise of according permission to establish new colleges of education in the State in future and that the existing institutions are found to be adequate. However, the right that is accrued to the petitioners on the basis of their application and the consideration thereof by the first respondent cannot be taken away on account of the change of policy. It is settled principle of law that whenever an application is made, it must be considered and processed in accordance with the provisions of law that existed as on the date of presentation. Subsequent changes may apply to the applications that are made thereafter.

Hence, the writ petition is also disposed of reiterating the same directions as noticed supra. No costs.”

The institution has vide its letter dated 28.01.2009 replied for all the deficiencies as mentioned in our letter dated 09.01.2009.

SRC considered to matter in 200th meeting and directed the Management/institution to resubmit the old application returned by SRC along with necessary documents as originally submitted relating to land, building, FDR, Application fee, inspection of Rs. 40000/-, Building Completion Certificate from competent Government Engineer/ authority and other relevant documents for processing and for necessary action.

As per direction of SRC a letter was issued on 28.02.2011 with request to submit the original application with other relevant document. In response to this office letter dt. 28.02.2011 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dt. 21.02.2011.

SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March-1st April, 2011 considered the written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection of the institution to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities.

Accordingly inspection of the institution was carried out on 18.04.2011 under Section 14 due to court direction.

The Committee considered the VT Report, and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice to the institution for the following: 34 1

 Seating capacity in the library, total number of books in the library and journals are not mentioned.

 In the building plan submitted, Khasara no. Plot no, are not mentioned.

 The total land area of 1745 sq.mts shown in the Affidavit is less than the requirement f regulations.

 In the Land usage certificate, in survey number-289, 800 yards area is shown for educational purpose, which is inadequate as per NCTE regulations.

 The Committee noted the complaint by e-mail dt. 29.05.2011 from “Swathi Namisha” on above institution and decided to call for Affidavit from the complainant and comments from the institution on the complaint without waiting for confirmation of minutes. (the complaint letter should accompany the show cause notice to the institution).

31. AOS00573 The Oxford College of Education, I Phase, J.P.Nagar, Bangalore-560078, APS00338 Karnataka APS01656 Pre-Primary D.Ed The Oxford College of Education, I Phase, J.P.Nagar, Bangalore-560078, B.Ed Karnataka submitted an application for offering B.Ed course on 29.12.2003. The The Oxford institution was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 College students vide order dated 30.11.2004. of Educatio Further, the institution has also submitted application for offering Pre-Primary & n, D.Ed courses on 16.02.1996 & 16.12.1996. The institution was granted recognition Bangalor for offering Pre-Primary & D.Ed course with an intake of 80 & 90 students vide e order dated 16.01.2001 & 19.10.2001. KA Earlier, SRC, NCTE has received a letter from NCTE, Hqrs dated 10.12.2010 which has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 03.05.2010. The SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22-23 December 2010 considered the VT report and all

the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Showcause notice for Pre-primary, D.Ed and B.Ed courses. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 28.01.2011. Further, the institution has submitted its written representation on 23.02.2011. The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April, 2011 considered the written representation and decided to continue recognition for all the three courses.

Now, NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 02.06.2011 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 30.04.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to look into the matter in order to ascertain the compliance/ adherence of the NCTE Norms and Standards by the institution and also to take appropriate action.

The committee considered Section 13 report and decided that earlier decision taken regarding this institution to continue the recognition in (203rd meeting of SRC held on 31st March & 1st April 2011) would hold good, as the Sec.13 visit was found repeated for the above institution with the same findings.

32. APS02033 Aristotle Teacher Training Institute, Andersonpet, K.G.F.-563113, Kolar APS06127 District, Karnataka D.Ed D.Ed-AI Aristotle Aristotle Teacher Training Institute, Andersonpet, K.G.F.-563113, Kolar District, Teacher Karnataka submitted an application for D.Ed course on 31.12.2003. The institution Training was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide Institute, order dated 29.11.2004. Kolar KA NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 02.06.2011 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 15.06.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to look into the matter in order to ascertain the compliance/ adherence of the NCTE Norms and Standards by the institution and also to take appropriate action.

The management is running B.Ed (APS0 ), C.P.Ed (APS0….) in the same building.

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution dt.05.05.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE ACT for the following:

 As per VT report, the total built up area for both D.Ed and B.Ed is 15000 sq.ft. which is grossly inadequate to run both the courses as per NCTE norms. No supporting documents have been submitted by the institution.

 The instructional facilities for B.Ed course is inadequate on the basis of details submitted by the institution. Only 35 books are available in the 36 1

library as per institution details submitted.

 The multipurpose hall size is only 750 sq.ft. which is inadequate as per NCTE Regulations. No documentary proof in support of the claim submitted by the institution that the size of the multiple purpose hall is measuring 10000 sq.ft and seating capacity of 300 students.

 The facilities for digital learning resources are not available. Since 7 years the digital learning resources are not provided by the institution to the D.Ed and B.Ed courses.

 The facilities in Science lab, Psychology & Education Technology lab is inadequate.

 The institution has only 6 computers for one unit of D.Ed and one unit of B.Ed course. No documentary proof is submitted by the institution.

 The management has not submitted the list of teaching staff duly approved by the affiliating body in prescribed format indicating all the details.

 The library of the institution has only 1020 books, 04 journals and 04 encyclopedias. The seating capacity in the library is only 35. The library is ill equipped as per NCTE norms.

 Consolidated salary is being paid to the staff, as per NCTE norms salary should be paid to the staff through Bank by Cheque and as per pay scale prescribed by UGC/Central/State Govt.

 CPF/PPF facility is not provided to the staff members.

 List of teaching staff & non-teaching staff for B.Ed / D.Ed and C.P.Ed courses with details of qualification and percentage of marks obtained are not submitted.

 FDRs for Rs 5 lacs and 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund towards all the courses in joint account is to be submitted.

 The earmarked Built up area for each course is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice. 33. APS01746 Sri Chayadevi D.Ed College, 1st Cross, Pensionrs Block, Rajendranagar, 37 1

APS05201 Mysore District-570007, Karnataka D.Ed D.Ed-AI Sri Chayadevi D.Ed College, 1st Cross, Pensioners Block, Rajendranagar, Mysore Sri District-570007, Karnataka submitted an application for offering D.Ed course on Chayade 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an vi D.Ed intake of 50 students vide order dated 21.12.2005. College, Mysore Further, the institution has also submitted application for offering D.Ed-AI course on KA 30.12.2005. The institution was granted recognition for offering D.Ed-AI course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 12.04.2007, thus making an annual intake of 100 students with a condition that the institution shall shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition (in case the course is started in rented premises). NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 24.05.2011 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 25.06.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to look into the matter in order to ascertain the compliance/ adherence of the NCTE Norms and Standards by the institution and also to take appropriate action.

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution dt.29.04.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice to all the courses Under Section 17 of NCTE ACT for the following:

 Sale deed executed on 25.01.1992 is in individual name of Sri. A. Beerappa for a land measuring 14400 sq.ft. which is against the regulations of NCTE. The institution has not submitted any supporting documents to ascertain that the building of the institution is constructed on this land and whether its built up area is sufficient for the sanctioned intake.

 Approved building plan from Govt.authority is to be submitted.

 Building completion certificate from Competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted.

 The room size of science labs is 10 x 10 = 100 sq,ft. is not adequate. No storage facilities and not adequate materials.

 Science lab, Psychology and Education Technology laboratories are to strengthened.

 The facilities for digital learning resources are not available.

 The institution has only 08 computers for two units of D.Ed course which is not sufficient.

 CPF/GPF facilities are not provided to the staff members.

 As per the report, the total built up area for two units of D.Ed course is only 14400 sq.ft. which is grossly inadequate as per NCTE norms.

 Furniture is inadequate for the class rooms and laboratories.

 It may be clarified as to why the favulty is underpaid and unhappy about salary and service conditions. They do not possess appointment orders and no service register is maintained. There are frequesnt changes in the staff. In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

34. APS03626 Neyveli Teacher Training Institute & National College of Education, Cuddalore APS03624 District, Tamilnadu APS09102 APS05610 Neyveli Teacher Training Institute & National College of Education, Krithika Garden, D.T.Ed keelakollai, Marungar Post, Kumbakonam Main Road, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore, B.Ed Tamilnadu was granted recognition for offering D.T.Ed & D.T.Ed-AI course on M.Ed 12.09.2006 & 01.08.2008, B.Ed course on 02.11.2005, M.Ed on 30.08.2008. D.T.Ed-AI In the mean time NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 31.05.2011 has forwarded a copy Neyveli of the inspection report dated 23.09.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Teacher Act. The deficiencies observed from the inspection report were communicated to Training the institution vide office letter no.13-8/2010/NCTE/SEC13/Insp/T.N-12/A30565 Institute dated 31.01.2011 & No.13-8/2010/NCTE/Sec.13/Insp/T.N-12/A34803 dated & 06.04.2011, which was replied by the institution vide its letters dated 24.02.2011 & National 23.04.2011. The present/latest status of deficiencies is also enclosed. College of Keeping all the facts in view NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC, may look into the Educatio matter to ascertain the adherence of relevant NCTE norms & standards by the n, institution and to take appropriate action in the matter under intimation to NCTE- Cuddalo Hqrs. re Note: SRC in its 178th meeting held on 13th-14th July 2009 after considering TN inspection report (Sathyam Committee) decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution Neyveli Teacher Training Institute (APS03626).

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution dt.24.02.2011 & 23.04.2011, and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice to all the courses Under Section 17 of NCTE ACT for the following:

 The institution has not submitted the approval of the affiliating body in respect of its teaching staff for B.Ed and M.Ed course. 39 1

 The institution has not submitted any documents to ascertain that it is paying its teaching/non-teaching staff as per UGC/Central/State Govt. scale as prescribed under NCTE norms, through the Bank.

 The trust of the institution is running two different teacher training institutions on the same land/premises. The trust is running three units of D.T.Ed course under Neyyeli Teacher Training Institute and one unit of B.Ed and One unit of M,Ed course under National College of Education in the same building, which is not provided/permissible as per NCTE regulations.

 The institution has not submitted the approval of affiliating body in r/o existing teaching staff for D.T.Ed course (3 Units). In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

35. APS05412 DMI Institute of Teacher Training Society, Chennai, Tamilnadu B.Ed DMI Institute of DMI Institute of Teacher Training Society, Palanchour, Chennai-602103, Tamilnadu Teacher submitted application was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course on Training 11.09.2007. Society, Chennai In the mean time NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 20.05.2011 has forwarded a copy TN of the inspection report dated 24.09.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. The deficiencies observed from the inspection report were communicated to the institution vide office letter no.13-8/2010/NCTE/SEC13/Insp/T.N-09/A29625 dated 04.01.2011 & No.13-8/2010/NCTE/Sec.13/Insp/T.N-09/A34810 dated 06.04.2011, which was replied by the institution vide its letters dated 17.02.2011 & 24.04.2011. The present/latest status of deficiencies is also enclosed.

Keeping all the facts in view NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC, to look into the matter to ascertain the adherence of relevant NCTE norms & standards by the institution and to take appropriate action in the matter under intimation to NCTE- Hqrs.

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution dt.17.02.2011 & 24.04.2011, and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE ACT for the following:

 Only ground floor of the building is completed and the rest of the building is still under construction. 40 1

 As per Vt report, the built up area earmarked for B.Ed course is only 10768 sq.ft, which is inadequate as per NCTE norms.

 The management is also running an Engineering College and a Matriculation Public School in the same Building/Campus. This is against the NCTE regulations.

 The institution has not submitted the approval of the affiliating body in respect of its faculty.

 Language learning lab is being shared with an Engineering College & Matriculation Public School.

 Salary is paid by cash not through Bank by Cheque. CPF/PPF facility to the staff members are not provided.

 Details of FDRs of 5 lacs and 3 lacs in joint account from a Nationalised Bank is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

36. APS01132 C.S. Jain Teacher Training Institute & College of Education, Cuddalore APS03607 District, Tamilnadu APS03605 APS07474 C.S. Jain Teacher Training Institute, Chidambaram Road, Thethampet, D.T.Ed Srimushuam, Cuddalore, Tamilnadu submitted application was granted recognition D.T.Ed-AI for offering D.T.Ed course on 09.09.2004, D.T.Ed-AI on 25.08.2005, B.Ed on B.Ed 29.12.2005, M.Ed on 02.11.2007. M.Ed C.S. Jain In the mean time NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 20.05.2011 has forwarded a copy Teacher of the inspection report dated 25.09.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Training Act. The deficiencies observed from the inspection report were communicated to Institute the institution vide office letter no.13-8/2010/NCTE/SEC13/Insp/T.N-13/A30870 & dated 08.02.2011, which was replied by the institution vide its letters dated College 15.04.2011. The present/latest status of deficiencies is also enclosed. of Educatio Keeping all the facts in view NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC, to look into the n, matter to ascertain the adherence of relevant NCTE norms & standards by the Cuddalo institution and to take appropriate action in the matter under intimation to NCTE- 41 1

re Hqrs. TN The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution dt. 15.04.2011, and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE ACT for the following:

 The institution has not submitted the legible copy of building plan hence its approval cannot be ascertained. The competent civic authority has not issued the building completion certificates.

 The authenticity of the claim of the institution cannot be ascertained that it has added 18 computers after the inspection/issue of NCTE deficiency letter. The stock register entry has not been indicated on the invoices/bills, submitted by the institution.

 The institution has not mentioned the approval of affiliating body in respect of three lecturers D. Kalalaivanan(Sl.no.3), A.Amali Issabella (Sl.No. 8) & K. Sakthivel (Sl.no.9).

 B.Ed course: The institution has mentioned that it has one principal and six lecturers. Two lecturers L. Ithavaventhen (Sl.no.5) & A.Arun Mozhi (sl.No.7) are not qualified as per NCTE norms prevailing at the time of their appointment. As per NCTE norms the institution should have 1+7 lecturers for B.Ed course.

 M.Ed Course: The institution has mentioned that it has one Principal, one Vice Principal/Reader and three lecturers. The Principal K. Balakrishnan (sl.no. 1) does not have the P.hD (Edn) degree hence, not qualified as per NCTE norms prevailing at the time of his appointment.

 The institution has not submitted the list of teaching staff of B.Ed & M.Ed approved by the Affiliating University.

 No documentary evidence is submitted by the institution that salary to its staff is paid as per UGC/Central/State Govt. scale.

 The Accessions register entry has not been indicated on this invoice/bills regarding the claim of the institution that it has purchased 1000 books and added to the library, and subscribed 5 journals and added 200 more books to the reference section.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the 42 1

matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

37. APS01358 Dr. MGR Educational & Research Institute, Chennai District, Tamilnadu B.Ed Dr. M.G.R. Educatio Dr. MGR Educational & Research Institute, Periyar EVR High Road (NH-4 nal & Highway), Maduravoyal, Chennai-600095, Tamilnadu was granted recognition for Researc offering B.Ed course vide order dated 17.11.2005 with an annual intake of 100 h students Institute, Chennai In the mean time NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 20.05.2011 has forwarded a copy TN of the inspection report dated 23.11.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. The deficiencies observed from the inspection report were communicated to the institution vide office letter no.13-8/2010/NCTE/SEC13/Insp/T.N-20/A34809 dated 06.04.2011, which was replied by the institution vide its letters dated 05.03.2011 & 21.04.2011. The present/latest status of deficiencies is also enclosed.

Keeping all the facts in view NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC, to look into the matter to ascertain the adherence of relevant NCTE norms & standards by the institution and to take appropriate action in the matter under intimation to NCTE- Hqrs.

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution dt. 5.3.2011 & 21.04.2011, and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE ACT for the following:

 The institution has not submitted any documentary evidence to ascertain whether/how the Kannammal Educational Trust (parent trust) was in possession of the said land in 2003. No documentary proof has been submitted in r/o transfer of land by Kannammal Educational Trust (Parent Trust) to Dr. M.G.R Educational & Research Institute Trust in 2003. It has not mentioned by the institution whether it has got the prior permission of SRC, NCTE, Bangalore for making lease deed of the said land on 02.02.2011. Under NCTE Regulations 2009, lease of Govt land is only acceptable.

 Fresh Building Completion Certificate from competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted. Even after a lapse of six years of grant of recognition the institution has not obtained the Building Completion Certificate.

 The total earmarked land & built up area for B.Ed course being run by the institution is to be submitted.

 Language learning lab and digital learning resources are not available.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby 43 1

providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

38. --- Report of Tumkur University, Tumkur regarding B.Ed Colleges. --- This office is in receipt of letter No.TY:VCPS:2011-12:98 dated 21.05.2011 from the Report of Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University, Tumkur by enclosing a list of 19 institutions Tumkur with the committee observations by conducting inspections. The report is as under: Universit Sl y, No Name of the College Observations Tumkur regardin 1 Sri Basaveswara College of 1. No. Multipurpose hall g B.Ed Education, Tiptur 2. No independent science college laboratory, ICT, Computer Lab, KA Psychology lab. 3. Three under qualified staff 4. No independent library for B.Ed College 5. Consolidated salary for staff members 6. Audit not done for the year 7. S.R. not maintained 8. No web site of the college as per NCTE. 2 Kalpataru College of 1 The College is literally locked Education, Tiptur. on the day of visit, reason not known. 3 T V V College of Education, 1 No. Multipurpose hall Madhugiri 2 Science and ICT laboratories not equipped 3 Physical conditions of class rooms are not good 4 No Educational Journals 5 No reading & reference rooms 4 R. Muddurangegowda 1 No. Multipurpose hall College of Education, Sira. 2 No science laboratory 3 No required number of Computers as per NCTE 4 No Audio-visual equipments 5 No books procured regularly 6 Educational Journals are not subscribed to the library 7 Consolidated salary for staff members 8 Two under qualified staff 44 1

5 Sri Siddhartha College of ------Education, Tumkur 6 K.S.E.F College of Education, 1 No. Multipurpose hall Tumkur 2 No required number of Computers as per NCTE 3 No Biology method teacher 4 Shortage of one classroom 5 Audit not done for the year 6 No reading room facility 7 Sridevi College of Education, 1 No. Multipurpose hall Tumkur 2 No independent science laboratory, ICT, Computer lab 3 No Audio-visual equipments 4 Educational Journals are not subscribed to the library as per NCTE norms 5 No reading room facility 6 S.R. not maintained 7 Consolidated salary for staff members 8 Siddaganga College of ------Education, Tumkur

9 Vidyavahini College of 1 No Audio-visual equipments Education, Tumkur 2 No qualified librarian 3 No reading room facility 4 No reference Section 5 Consolidated salary for staff members 6 No website of the college 10 Digvijaya Rural College of 1 No independent science Education, Hadavanahalli, laboratory, ICT, Computer Lab, Turuvekere Tq. Tumkur Psychology lab 2 No Audio-visual equipments 3 Two under qualified staff 4 No independent library for B.Ed College 5 No qualified librarian 6 Consolidated salary for staff members 7 Students are irregular 8 S.R & Acquaintance registers not maintained. 9 No website of the college as per NCTE 11 Sri Channabasaveswara 1 No. Multipurpose hall College of Education, Gubbi. 2 No Audio-visual equipments 3 Science laboratories not 45 1

equipped 4 No independent library for B.Ed College 5 No reading room facility 6 No reference Section 7 Educational Journals are not subscribed to the library as per NCTE norms 8 Consolidated salary for staff members 9 No website of the college as per NCTE 12 Nayala College of Education, 1 Admission procedure not followed Tumkur 2 No science laboratory, ICT, Computer Lab, Psychology lab 3 No. Multipurpose hall 4 No Audio-visual equipments 5 Staff patter not according to NCTE norms 6 NO Library 7 No Educational Journals subscribed 8 No reading & reference rooms 9 Consolidated salary for staff members 10 No transparency in curricular transactions 11 S.r & students attendance registers not maintained. 12 No web site of the college as per NCTE 13 Violates all norms & regulations. 13 S V S College of Education, 1 No. Multipurpose hall Tumkur 2 No science laboratory, 3 No Audio-visual equipments 4 Library books are not according to NCTE norms. 5 Consolidated salary for staff members 6 S.R. not maintained. 14 Indira College of Education, 1 No Audio-visual equipments Tumkur 2 No independent science laboratory, ICT, Computer lab, Psychology lab 3 Library books are not according to NCTE norms. 4 No Educational Journals subscribed 46 1

5 No reading & reference rooms. 6 No staff book issue register 7 Consolidated salary for staff members

15 Sri Krishna College of 1 No independent science Education, Tumkur laboratory, ICT, Computer lab Psychology lab 2 No Audio-visual Equipments 3 One Under qualified staff 4 No library 5 No Educational Journals subscribed 6 No reading & reference rooms 7 Consolidated salary for staff members 8 No transparency in curricular activities 9 No Registers maintained properly 16 Rajiv Gandhi College of 1 No Multipurpose Hall Education, Tumkur 2 No independent Science laboratory, ICT, Computer lab, Psychology lab 3 No Audio-visual equipments 4 No Educational Journals subscribed 5 No reading & reference rooms 6 Consolidated salary for staff members 7 Service Registers are not maintained. 17 Bharathi College of 1 Admission procedure not followed Education, Tumkur 2 No independent science laboratory, ICT, Computer lab, Psychology lab 3 No Audio-visual equipments 4 Infrastructure not according to NCTE norms 5 One under qualified staff 6 Consolidated salary for staff members 7 No library 8 No Educational Journals subscribed 9 No reading & reference booms 10 No transparency in curricular transactions 11 S.R & students attendance 47 1

registers not maintained 12 No web site of the college as per NCTE 18 Divya College of Education, 1 Infrastructure not according to Tumkur NCTE norms 2 No Multipurpose hall 3 No independent science laboratory, ICT. Computer lab, Psychology lab 4 No Audio-visual Equipments 5 No library 6 No educational journals subscribed 7 No reading & reference rooms 8 Consolidated salary for staff members 9 No transparency in curricular programmes 10 Audit not done for the year 11 Registers not maintained 12 No web site of the college

19 Akshaya College of 1 No procedure followed for Education, Tumkur admission 2 Do not have multipurpose hall 3 Do not have class rooms sufficiently 4 No permanent Principal 5 No appointment orders given to staff members 6 No independent science laboratory, ICT, Psychology lab 7 No Audio-visual equipments 8 No library, no qualified librarian 9 No Educational Journals subscribed 10 No reading & reference rooms 11 Furniture not sufficient 12 Consolidated salary for staff members 13 Audit not done for the year 14 No transparency in curricular programmes 15 Did not maintain registers 16 No web site of the college.

The committee noted the inspection report of the Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University, dt. 21.05.2011 and the deficiencies in the 19 institutions in Tumkur 48 1

District and decided to issue show cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for the deficiencies pointed out against each of the institution, as listed under item no. 38 of the 206th meeting.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to each of the institutions as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

39. APS02825 An application was submitted by RG Reddy Teacher Training Institute, Mahabubnagar D.Ed District, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, R.G. Reddy Bangalore vide dated 30.01.2004. Teacher The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the Training State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further Institute, recognise/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Mahabu Pandit course(s). bnagar The SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13 January, 2009 having considered the letter AP dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh decided to give effect to the above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect. A letter dated 07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the State of Andhra Pradesh as the above colleges are exceeding in numbers than required. A letter dated 17.03.2009 is has been received from NCTE, Hqrs informing that the “The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been decided that no further Recognition/ Permission to any institution in the State of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-2010 for B.Ed, D.Ed, and Physical Education courses also”.

The State Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of this institution. The letters dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 was considered by SRC in its 172nd Meeting held on 25-26 March, 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Training Institutions in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to close the applications.

As per the decision of SRC the application was closed on 29.04.2009

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.11828 of 2009 without approaching to appellate authority. Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 10.11.2010 vide W.P.No. 11828 of 2009 reads as hereunder:

“ It may be true that the State Government as well as the first respondent have reviewed the situation as to the necessary or otherwise of according permission to establish new colleges of education in the State in future and that the existing institutions are found to be adequate. However, the right that is accrued to the petitioners on the basis of their application and the consideration thereof by the first respondent cannot be taken away on account of the change of policy. It is settled principle of law that whenever an application is made, it must be considered and processed in accordance with the provisions of law that existed as on the date of presentation. Subsequent changes may apply to the applications that are made thereafter.

SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20th –21st January, 2011 considered the Hon’ble High Court order dt. 10.11.2010 and other relevant documents and decided to process the application on submission of original application and related supporting documents within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the Minutes.

Accordingly institution in its letter dated 09.03.2011 submitted its documents as follows:

SRC in its 203rd Meeting held on 31st March & 1st April, 2011 considered the written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection for D.Ed (APS02825) course, and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities.

Accordingly inspection of the institution was carried out on 18.04.2011, Under Section 14 due to court direction.

SRC in its 203rd Meeting held on 31st March & 1st April, 2011 considered the written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection for D.Ed (APS02825) course, and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities.

Accordingly inspection of the institution was carried out on 18.04.2011

The Committee considered the VT Report, the VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the Show cause Notice for the following:

 The building completion certificate issued is for only one building. Building wise building completion certificate is to be submitted by the management.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary

certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

Court Cases/Appeal/Notice/Complaint/Shifting/Miscellaneous Cases (Vol-3)

40. ----- NCTE-Hqrs vide its letter dt. F-No.49-8/2011/NCTE/N&S dt. 27.05.2011 forwarded ----- a letter drawing attention towards the National Council for Teacher Education Timely (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2009 as amended subsequently, processing of which stipulate a time bound procedure for processing of applications. The application in procedure and deadline for processing and final disposal of applications have been accordance indicated in the second amendment of NCTE Regulations, 2009 published with NCTE videGazette Notification No.188 dt. 26th July 2010. Regulation ---- And requested to take time bound action to process of all applications for the academic session 2011.12 and complete the formalities positively on or before 31st July 2011 in order to avoid legal complications that may arise due to delay in the process. No further processing of application will be permitted beyond the prescribed date as per NCTE Regulations. In case, the task could not be completed as per time schedule, it will be the responsibility of Regional Committee and convener concerned.

The committee has noted the contents of NCTE letter and decided to complete the processing /disposed of all the new applications by July 31, 2011. 41. SRCAPP185 Sri Konidela Venkat Rao Memorial College of Education, Plot no- 583, B.Ed Village- Krishna Vilas Colony Nuzvid, Post- Nuzvid, Taluka- Nuzvid, Distt- Krishna, Sri Konidela Andhara Pradesh. Course – B.Ed. file no. SRCAPP185. Venkat Rao Memorial 2.Nova Educational Society, Plot no – 23, Street no – 10 C, Village- New MLA & College of MP’s, Post office- Jubilee, Taluka- Jubilee Hills, Distt- Hyderabad, Andhara Education, Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sri Konidela Venkat Rao Memorial Krishna College of Education, Plot no- 583, Village- Krishna Vilas Colony Nuzvid, Post- AP Nuzvid, Taluka- Nuzvid, Distt- Krishna, Andhara Pradesh for B.Ed Course of One year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 30.10.2009.

1. The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 22.12.2009. for following deficiencies.

i. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Endowment funds- the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds vide no 030904 dated 31.10.09 for ten years issued by Central Bank of India, Hyderabad. Hence the institution is required to submit fresh original FDR for proposed course as per regulation. ii. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund vide no 030905 dated 31.09.2009 for ten years issued by 51 1

Central Bank of India, Hyderabad. Hence the institution is required to submit original fresh FDR for proposed course as per regulation. iii. Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority :- the institution has submitted land documents in local regional language.. Hence the institution is required to submit Certified copy/ notarized copy of the registered land documents in english version. As per application the institution is running different course technical /teacher education course in same premises. Hence the institution is required to submit information in following format.

SR NAME OF NAME OF Location of land DATE OF DATE OF N SOCIETY COURSE PLOT NO RECOGNITIO AFFLIATIO O /KHASHARA NO N N.

iv. Approved building plan by the competent civil authority :- Institution has not submitted approved building plan by competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit approved building plan with earmarked area for existing course/propose course, wherein it should be clearly mentioning i.e Khashara no, plot no, duly approved by competent authority with resolution in English language. If the institution has running other teacher education courses/ other technical courses in the same premises , the institution shall submit earmarked area for proposed course with total area and built up area. v.. Building completion certificate:- The institution has not submitted building completion certificate in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed format. (copy enclosed) vi. Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has not submitted notarized copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) CLU (Agriculture lands –conversion to Non – Agricultural purpose) issued by competent authority.

vii. Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs 100/ stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or Notary public, stating the precise location of the land (village, district, state etc) the total area in possession, the permission of the competent authority to use the land for educational purpose and mode of possession i.e. ownership or lease :- the institution has submitted affidavit of Rs 100/- stamp paper but not attested by oath commissioner or Notary public. Hence the institution is required to submit affidavit of Rs 100/- stamp paper, in prescribed format duly attested by oath commissioner or Notary public, stating the precise location of the land (village, district, state etc) the total area in possession, the permission of the competent authority to use the land for educational purpose and mode of possession i.e. ownership or lease from Govt..

viii. NAAC Certificate :- The institution has not submitted NAAC certificate with B. Grade for proposed course. Hence the institution is required to submit NAAC certificate with B. Grade. It is not clear whether institution wants to start in a new building or in the exiting building .

ix. Prof of completion of three academic required.

x. Minority Certificate:- the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in this regard. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority. In addition to the institution to ascertain full intake capacity, copies of other TTIs running by you.

xi. As per provision of NCTE Regulation, 2009, the institution is required to complete three academic session of additional intake / additional course

The institution not submitted reply of deficiency letter.

2. The SRC considered the matter in its 190th meeting held on 29th-30th March 2010 and on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds:-

The institution has not replied to the deficiency letters even after a lapse of three months and hence it is decided that no further action is necessary and that the applications are to be rejected.

The Regulation 2009 stipulated that all deficiencies should be removed within 60 days of the receipt of such deficiency letter.

Therefore the application of Sri Konidela Venkat Rao Memorial College of Education, Plot no- 583, Village- Krishna Vilas Colony Nuzvid, Post- Nuzvid, Taluka- Nuzvid, Distt- Krishna, Andhara Pradesh for permission to B.Ed Course was hereby rejected. AS per direction of SRC rejection order issued on 30.04.2010.

The institution approached to appeal wherein the Appellate authority confirm the order appealed against vide order dated 21.07.2011. Now the institution has approached to Hon’ble High of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in writ petition no. 5289/2011.

5. Further as per order the Apex court in the judgement in Civil Appeal NO. 1125- 1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as under:-

“ An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions 53 1

specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to.”

Thus the institution has not adhered to the stipulated time frame in the Regulations and Act and thus may apply of such when the applications for 2012-13 are called for.

6. The institution has approached to Hon’ble High court in writ petition no. 5289/2011.

In this regard brief history of the fact was communicated to our legal counsel on 29/03/2011 with request to defend the case in the interest of NCTE. Further the Hon’ble High court has passed an order in writ petition no. 5289/2011 as under :- “ the Short prayer made- by the petitioners in this writ petition is that they may be permitted to make applications before the second respondent seeking relaxation of the cut-off date for compliance of the deficiencies as prescribed under Regulation 7 of the NCTE 2009.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that no prejudice would be cause to either of the pretties in case the petitioners are permitted to make applications seeking more time to do away with the deficiencies.

In view of the above, the petitioners are permitted to move the applications as prayed for under Regulation 11 of the NCTE Regulation, 2009.

In case the applications are filed, the same shall be considered with a period of three weeks thereafter.

Post after summer vacation, 2011.”

The original file placed alongwith court order before SRC for direction/consideration

The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

42. B.Ed Gowthami Educational Society, NO. 7-25-21, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari- Gowthami 534101, Andhra Pradesh was submitted an application on 28.09.2010 for Educational seeking recognition of B.Ed Course for the session 2011-12. Society, West In order to regulate the growth of teacher education at all levels, it has been decided Godavari inter-alia in consultation with the State Government/Uts, not to further recognize / AP permit institution for conduct of following teacher training courses for the academic session 2010-2011 in the State of Andhra Pradesh indicated below: 54 1

Andhra Pradesh – B.Ed., D.Ed., Public Notice in Times of India dated 29.07.2010 refers in this regard.

Therefore, the application submitted by the institution for B.Ed course was returned along with Demand Draft bearing Nos. 247854 & No.247855 dated 18.09.2010 for Rs. 40100/- & Rs.1000/- respectively.

The institution has approached to Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition no. 10748/2011 without appeal to NCTE Head Quarters in the matter of Gowthamie Educational Society Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Regional Director, SRC, NCTE. In this Writ petition the Hon’ble High court has ordered as under:-

“ When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in this writ petition is similar to the one in W.P. NO. 1320/2011, which was disposed of by this court on 28.01.2011 where under the impugned proceedings were set aside the respondents were directed to consider the application of the petitioner afresh by treating the said application for the academic year 2011-12 and pass appropriate orders.

Since the issue involved in this writ petition is similar to the one in W.P. NO. 1320 of 2011, which was disposed of on 28.01.2011 as above, following the said order this writ petition is disposed of setting aside the proceedings issued by 1st respondent vide F.SRO/NCTE/2009/2010/21565 dated 29.09.2010 and directing the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner afresh by treating the said application for the academic year 2011-12 and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from today. No order as to costs”.

Brief fact along with court order placed before SRC for direction in the matter.

The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Courtof Hyderabad immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

43. APS09225 Sri Venkateshwara School of Education (D.Ed), Sri Gudibandi Somi Reddy D.Ed Educational Society, Kollipara, Guntur Dist-522304, Andhra Pradesh. Sri Venkateshw The institution was submitted an application on 11.12.2007 for D.Ed course in the ara School of office of SRC. This office has issued closure letter on 07.07.2008 with the direction Education, that no further correspondence whatever will be entertained in this regard, due to Guntur non compliance of deficiencies within stipulated period. AP The institution has approached to Hon’ble High court in W.P. No. 8032 of 2011 in the matter of Sri Venkateshwara School of Education (D.Ed), Sri Gudibandi Somi Reddy Educational Society, Kollipara, Guntur Dist-522304, Andhra Pradesh Vs NCTE without approaching the Appellate Authority, NCTE, New Delhi U/S 18 of NCTE Act.

The Hon’ble High court has passed on order dated 28.03.2011 as under: “If application dated 16.10.2007, submitted by the petitioner for grant of recognition to D.Ed. course is not considered as on today, the first respondent is directed to consider the same in the next meeting to be held, pending further orders.”

Order of Hon’ble High court along with original file of the institution is placed before SRC for direction

As per the order of the Hon’ble High Court no application of the institution is pending as on 28-03-2011, as the institution’s application is already closed vide letter dated 07-07-2008.

The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes. 44. APS09432 Application was submitted by Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Eeducational Society D.Ed Prakasam, Andhhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office Sri Lakshmi of SRc-NCTE Bangalore vide dt. 03.04.2008. The file was under process and in Narasimha the meanwhile in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Educational Pradesh vide letter dt. 07.01.2009. not to durther recognize/permit the institutions to Society, conducting B.Ed and D.Ed Physical Education, Language pandit courses. Prakasam AP SRC in its 169th meeting held on 12-13 January 2009 having considered the letter dt. 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such with immediate effect.

A letter dt. 17th March, 2009 has been received from NCTE hqrs informing that the recommendations of the Govt,. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant reconition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed and D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been considered in NCTE and it has been decided that no further recognition/permission to any institution in the State of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-10 for B.Ed, D.Ed and Physcial Education courses also. The State Government vide its letter dt. 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of your institution. The letter dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2008, 17.03.2009 and 20.3.2009 was considered by SRc in its 172th meeting held on 225-26 March 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government ofg Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the teacher training institutions in the state of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009 – 10 and decided to close the applications.

The application submitted by Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Educational Society, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh was thus closed and letter was issued on 24.04.2009. The institution approced to Honb’bleHigh Court in its W.P No. 33871 without approaching to the appellate authority. The Hon’ble High Court passed an order as . in W.P.No. under., wherein this court inter alia held as under: 56 1

The writ petition is disosed of directing the first respondent to take necessary steps as contemplated in its communication dt. At the interlocutory of stage, the writ petiion is taken up for hearning and disposal ith the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

W.P.M.P No.33871 of 2010 is filed seeking to dispose of the writ petition in terms of order, dt. 16.12.2009, in W.P.No.6712 of 2009. The wit petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside order inf.SRS/NCTE/2008-09/11913, dt. 22.04.2009, of respondent No.1. whereby it has closed the petitioner’s application seeking recognition for starting Vijetha College of D.Ed in pursuance of the purported policy decision of respondent No.3 not to recognize/permit any institutions for cnducting D.Ed. At the time of hearning, the learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the issues raised in this writ petition are covered by order, dt. 24.11.2009 and pass appropriate orders. There shall be no order as to costs.

Following the above order, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the same with the direction that the reasons and directions contained in the said order, dt. 16.12.2009, shall form part of this order.

As sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.NO.17959 pf 2009 amd W.P.M.P.No 33871 of 2010 filed by the petitioner are disposed of as infructuous.

The Committee considered the matter and decided to process the application on submission of original application and all related supporting documents as per the regulations, within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the Minutes.

45. APS08131 Mother Theressa Minority Welfare Educational Society, H.No.2-3-703/B/1/2, Tirmal Nagar, Amber B.Ed pet, Hyderabad- 500 013 for grant of recognition to Alex College of Education, Gandimaisamma Alex College X Road, D Pochampally, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist- 500 043 for B.Ed Course on of Education, 23.01.2007. Ranga The application has been scrutinized as per the provisions contained in the Regulation Reddy dtd.27.12.2005 of NCTE published in the Gazette of India on 13.01.2006. And Deficiency AP letter was issued on 30.03.07 to the Institution for the following 1. Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority for B.Ed in not submitted 2. A copy of building completion certificate from the competent authority is not submitted. 3. Affidavit relating to details of land possessed on Rs.100 stamp paper attested by Notary public has not been furnished.

In the deficiency letter it is mentioned about the period of 90 days time given to submit written representation along with all required documents and also informed that in case of any deficiencies stated above still remaining and not removed within 90 days time, no extension of time will be granted and any submissions received after 90 days will be treated as invalid . Closure dt.06.11.07 was sent to the Institution for Non compliance of the deficiency letter 57 1

within 90 days period. Informing the institution about expiry of stipulated period of 90 days. Consequent upon the direction of the SRC the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has7 been treated incomplete. Therefore the same is here by closed.

Mother Theressa Minority Welfare Educational Society, H.No.2-3-703/B/1/2, Tirmal Nagar, Amber pet, Hyderabad- 500 013,has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 13197 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad verses – NCTE- SRC, The Government of Andhra Pradesh School Education as first and second respondents respectively against the above SRC order dt.07.01.2009.

Hon’ ble High Court has passed an order dt.25.04.2011 in WP No. 13197of 2011 as under

The petitioner have prayed that the decision be issued to the 1st Respondent to consider the application dt. 02.07.2007 filed by then pursuant to the communication sane by the 2 nd respondent on 07.01.2009 with regard to change of policy of the state Government.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent that in case the aforementioned application filled by the petitioner is pending before it, the respondent shall take necessary steps as contemplated in its communication dt 07.01.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law there shall be no order as to costs,

The Court order along with file placed before SRC for direction/ decision

Note: In accordance with the Hon’ble High Court Order, no application of the said Institution is seen be pending before SRC as the same is already closed vide letter dt.06.11.07

The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad, immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

To file appeal against the orders of High Court 46. APS09050 Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education, Tuticorin District, B.Ed Tamilnadu Rosammal Memorial Refusal order was issued to the institution on 3.3.2011 for B.Ed course. Minority College of The institution submitted application with D.D. of Rs. 40,000 and a court order Education, dated 6.4.2011 in W.P. No. 6188 of 2011 filed by Rosammal Memorial Minority Tuticorin College of Education, Tuticorin District, Tamilnadu, the court has directed that “…… TN however liberty is granted to the petitioner to take appropriate steps for transferring the lands in the name of the institution and thereafter make necessary application to the authorities concerned under the Act by complying with the various requirements and if such application is made, it is for the second respondent to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that after taking necessary steps, application will be made within four weeks. It is made clear that on such application being made, the second respondent shall take decision expeditiously, in the manner known to law” 58 1

The matter was placed before SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th and 28th April, 2011. The Committee considered the matter and decided to process the application on submission of original application and related supporting documents as per the regulations within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the minutes.

As per decision of SRC, the application was processed and the following deficiencies are;

1. As per the new regulation the application was not submitted on line mode. 2. As per the new regulation the application should have been submit on or before 1st October, 2010 3. The institution has not submitted Building Completion certificate. 4. The institution has not submitted Land use certificate. 5. The English version of land document is registered on 11.4.2011. 6. Approved building plan submitted is not clear.

Meantime, a letter from NCTE-Hqrs. received on 24.5.2011 stated that the Hon’ble Court in W.P. No. 6188 of 2011 filed by Rosammal Memorial Minority College of Education, whereby the Hon’ble court directed petitioner to submit the application within a period of 4 weeks for fresh consideration i.e. 25.5.2011. After examining the court order in consultation with the Regulation Section, the submission of applications would strictly be in accordance with the Regulation in vogue. Hence, the court direction are like to challenge before the Division Bench.

Accordingly, a letter to the advocate was sent on 2.6.2011 with the request to file an appeal against the above court directions immediately before the Division Bench in the matter.

Shri. K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Advocate in its letter dated 4.6.2011 stated that in the above matter by order dated 6.4.2011, the Hon’ble High Court has upheld the action of the NCTE. The only direction given to the petitioner is to submit fresh application after complying with the necessary requirements. The institution can submit fresh application by satisfying all the requirements as per the norms existing as on to-day. If such application is submitted and complied with all the requirements, you can consider and pass necessary orders or you can reject the application. Nothing more in the said order and no positive direction has been given. Hence the question of filing appeal does not arise. The institution being a minority, they can apply any time but you can consider only in accordance with the law existing as on the date of disposal of the application. The date of application is immaterial only law existing on the date of disposal shall apply.

The committee has noted the points and decided to inform the Head Quarters about the legal opinion of the Advocate; with a request for further direction in the matter. 47. APS04925 Thozhilathibar Teacher Training Institute, Edamalaipattipudur, Trichy Dt. TN. D.T.Ed 59 1

Thozhilathiba Thozhilathibar Teacher Training Institute was granted recognition on 07.09.2006 for D.T.Ed r Teacher course and for D.T.Ed-AI on 16.01.2008. Training On the basis of Direction of MHRD to re-inspect all the institutions granted recognition by Institute, th Trichy SRC in its 116 meeting as per the recommendation of Sri. Sathyam Committee reports. The inspection of the institution under section 17 was carried out on 18.12.2008. Whereas, TN the institution has approached the Hon’ble Court in WP.29977/2008. The matter was considered by SRC in its 170th meeting held on 16-17th February 2009 and decided to issue show cause notice, accordingly a show cause notice u/s 17. Accordingly a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 4.4.2009. The institution submitted its reply on 15.4.2009, the same was considered by SRC in its 180 th meeting held on 29th July 2009 and SRC decided to issue notice under section 17. Accordingly a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 01.09.2009. The institution submitted its reply on 26.10.09.

SRC considered the written representation submitted by the institution and decided to continue the approval given to Thozhilathibar Teacher Training Institute (D.T.Ed, APS04925) and withdraw the recognition for D.T.Ed.(APS08186) course for which the land/buildings/infrastructure are not available as per the norms, as inferred from the reply statements furnished by the institution.

As per the decision of SRC, a letter of continued recognition in respect of Thozhilathibar TTI, Trichy District, Tamilnadu was issued to the institution for D.T.Ed course on 9.2.2010(APS04925) and withdrawal order was issued to the above mentioned institution on 9.2.2010 for D.T.Ed course.

Meanwhile, a complaint dated 09.09.2010 was received from Hope Foundation, which was considered by SRC in its 196th meeting held on 15th and 16th September, 2010. The committee considered the matter and decided to inform the complainant that he is free to seek legal remedy as it is a civil dispute.

Meantime, the legal notices dated 25.10.2010 and 18.1.2011 was considered by SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20th and 21st January, 2011. The Committee considered the legal notices and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following :

 The management has to submit all the original documents and land lease Deed agreement documents of the institution, along with the remarks on the contents of legal notice issued on behalf of the one M.T.Karunanidhi who claims to be the lessor, that the present land where the building is situated at Door No. 43, Rajiv Gandhinagar, Ekamalaipudur, Trichy-12, Tamilnadu, was partly leased to the above institution. The lease agreement was allegedly cancelled on 30.1.2007. Now the management has to file an affidavit on the authenticity of the above facts and submit the original records for verification.

 Specific remarks on the allegation that the management/trust had concealed and suppressed the fact of cancellation of lease deed and thereby misled and violated NCTE norms and Regulations, to be submitted in the affidavit.

 The SRC denies and takes strong exception to the mischievous, unfounded and false allegations against NCTE SRC, made out in the legal notice issued on behalf of one M.T. Karunanidhi said to be the lessor of the said land; that the information on the said cancellation of the lease deed said to have taken place as early as 30-01.2007, took more than four years to reach the SRC NCTE is ununderstandable.

 Any Civil/Criminal dispute arising out of lessor and lessee deal may have to be resolved by a Court of Law and the litigant is free to proceed legally in the matter; and any attempt to involve the regulatory authority in the issue and discredit the same is unwarranted.

In the meantime, one more legal notice dated 12.2.2011 was received on 15.2.2011 from Shri. A. Kumar, Advocate which was placed before SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February, 2011 and the Committee decided as follows;-

“ To take appropriate legal action against the complainant for indulgence in sinister campaign and casting aspersions on the NCTE, by making false and malicious allegations.

To call for remarks of the institution on the specific allegation that the institution had submitted some forged documents to the SRC.

To cause a composite inspection of the teacher education institutions of the above management, on receipt of the remarks and all the related documents and filled in questionnaire and the requisite inspection fee from the institution”.

As per the decision of SRC, letter was issued to the institution on 7.3.2011 and a letter was issued to Advocate Counsel on 07.03.2011 to take legal action.

In response to this office letter dated 7.3.2011 and a letter to the institution as per the SRC’s decision of 201st meeting, the institution has submitted reply on 18.4.2011 stated that a case is pending in the court of the District Municif Trichirapalli in O.S. No. 1359 of 2010 and I.A. No. 567 of 2010 regarding the right of possession of the building and land by the Management and other party.

The institution has not submitted D.D. of Rs. 40,000/- as an inspection along with essential documents as per the letter dated 7.3.2011. Instead the institution has submitted a copy of court order of the District Munisif of Trichirapally is as follows;

The prayed that “this Hon’ble court may be pleased to grant temporary injunction retraining the defendant, his men, agents, servants, and any persons claiming under him from in any way interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property either by dispossess upon or otherwise in any manner whatsoever except under due process of law till the disposal of the suit and also pass an interim exparte injunction till the disposal of application and thus render justice”.

It appears that the place where institution is being run is the property right/dispute to which is under dispute. It also appears that interim injunction is given to the institution to run the institution. If the institution is running there inspection as directed by SRC can be carried out. The committee in its 204th meeting held on 26th-27th April 2011 considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection at the premises in anticipation of inspection fee of Rs. 40000/- per course, as originally decided and as the Court Order is not against the NCTE inspection Under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 30th May to 4th June 2011, the same was intimated to the institution on 24.05.2011. VT report is awaited.

Meanwhile, the institution submitted letter alongwith rs.40000/- requesting 3 months time for the shifting and inspection of the institution. The institution has stated as follows: “We received your letter on 26.05.2011, in which it has been mentioned that the visiting team of NCTE-SRO, will come for inspection of one institution between 30th May to 4th June and to submit the relevant documents to them.

Pertaining to this subject I wish to state that already we have sent the reply letter to you mentioning that we have dispute over the possession of building and land where the institution is running at present, for which a civil suit is pending in Munsif Court of Trichirapalli, and we have obtained interim injection order also till 22.07.2011.

In such circumstances, again it has been insisted by the NCTE, SRC to be ready for the insepction in between the dates from 30.05.2011 to 04.06.2011. on seeing your letter, we have obtained the D.D also for Rs.40000/- which can be considered to have been paid well in advance for the inspection at that time of shifting of institution to the new building after 4 months.

Apart from this we wish to state that the necessary documents/connected records are under the custody of court which cant be obtained inview of the summer vacation to the courts in Tamilnadu.

Moreover, we want to insist that already the construction of building for the shifting of the institution is under progress and process after getting the application for construction and the construction will be completed by 15th September 2011 approximately. Hence the shifting and inspection will be possible only after that in view of shifting and court interim injection order.

In such circumstances, it is humbly requested that the inspection for shifting of institution may please be post-poned after 15th September 2011 and request that 4 months time may please be given for the shifting of building, besides allowing the institution to run in the present place and location without any disturbance to the students till September and without prejudice, since we have for the interim injection order of court also till 22.07.2011 which will be (can be) extended till 62 1

22.10.2011.

By and large it is shortly informed that it is subjudice, since the interim injection order is under existence till 22.07.2011 and apart from this we request he shifting time till 15.09.2011, for which kind of action use will be very much thankful to you.”

The committee considered the Hon’ble High Court order and request of the institution and decided to cause composite inspection of the institution in the last week of September 2011.

48. APS08206 Sri Sai Educational Society, Mahabubnagar district , Andhra Pradesh submitted an D.Ed application to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to Sri Sai Sri Sai College of Elementary Education , H.No. 9-34/2, Ranga Rao Thota, Jadcherla, Mahabub College of Nagar Dist- 509 301 Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course on 17.01.2007 Elementary Inspection as carried out on 26.05.2007 to verify the essential documents as per NCTE Education. regulations, Human Resources , Infrastructural and Instructional facilities provided by the Mahabubnag institution. VT report was placed in the 141st Meeting of Southern Regional Committee ar held on 6th -9th September 2007. The committee on careful perusal of original file, VT AP reports and related documents noted that said deficiency still persists:  The Building is still under construction. In view of the above decided to issue Show Cause Notice to the Institution. Accordingly, Notice dt. 26.09.2007 was issued to the institution for the above reason giving 30 days time to submit written representation for the notice

The Institution submitted its reply to notice on 01.10.2007. The reply was placed in the 147th Meeting of SRC held on 13th-14th November 2007. The committee decided to cause re inspection of the Institution. Accordingly re inspection was conducted on 22.11.2007.

The VT report received was placed before the SRC in its 150th Meeting held on 26 December 2007. On perusal of the VT report of re inspection the committee noted the following deficiencies still persists in the Institution  The building construction is not completed  The constructed building is not adequate for both existing and proposed courses. In view of the above the committee decided to refuse recognitions to the Institution f or the proposed course as per Section 14(3) (b) of NCTE Ac of 1993. Accordingly refusal order was issued to the Institution on 11.01.08. Aggrieved by the refusal order institution preferred an appeal . Their appeal has also been rejected vide order dt. 19.09.2008 Contd.. The institution has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 32169 of 2010 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh verses Principal Secretary, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh , NCTE-Hqrs and NCTE-SRC, as first, second and third respondents respectively.

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad passed an order in WP 32169 of 2010 on 21.04.2011 as mentioned below

“ It may be true that the State Government as well as the first respondent have reviewed the situation as to the necessity or otherwise of according permission to establish new colleges of education in the State. In future and that the existing Institutions are found to be adequate. However, the right that is accrued to the petitioners on the basis of the application and the consideration thereof by the first respondent cannot be taken away on the account of the change of policy. It is settled Principle of Law that whenever an application is made, it must be considered and processed in accordance with the provisions of Law of the policy that existed as on the date of presentation subsequent change may apply to the applications that are made thereafter.

Hence, the WP is disposed of directing the first respondent to take necessary steps as contemplated in its communication dt. 24.11.2009 and pass appropriate orders. There shall be not other costs”

49. APS02792 An application was submitted by IRFF Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, D.Ed Gospel Fields, Repalle, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to IRFF D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Bangalore vide dated 03.02.2004. Institute of Elementary The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations Teacher of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to Education, further recognise/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Guntur Education, Language Pandit course(s). AP The SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13 January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.

The State Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been 64 1

decided not to recommend the name of this institution. The letters dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 was considered by SRC in its 172nd Meeting held on 25-26 March, 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Training Institutions in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to close the applications.

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.12729 of 2011 without approaching the appellate authority.

Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 28.04.2011 vide W.P.No. 12729 of 2011 reads as hereunder:

“ The petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned proceedings of respondent No.1 dated 29.04.2009 wherein they have refused to consider the petitioners proposal for recognition of B.Ed course in view of the directive of the State of Andhra Pradesh in its policy dated 07.01.2009.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to my notice order of this court in W.P.No.6712 of 2009 dated 06.12.2009 which has also been followed by another learned single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.9360 of 2010 and passed order directing respondent No.3 herein i.e. the National Council for Teacher Education to consider the application of the petitioner therein without reference to the policy of the State Government dated 07.01.2009.

Since the present case falls squarely covered, there shall be a similar direction until further orders.

Therefore, it is directed that respondents shall consider the application of the petitioner without reference to the State Government’s policy dated 07.01.2009”.

To process on resubmission of the original application along with all the relevant documents as originally submitted along with this application. 50. APS09442 St. Mary’s Vidyalaya Educational Society, Mahabub nagar, Andhra Pradesh has submitted an D.Ed application to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to St. Mary’s Mary’s College of Education No.8-2-217, Padmavathy Colony, Mahabubnagar- 509 002 Andhra Pradesh Vidyalaya for D.Ed Course. Educational The application submitted by the institution was processed and deficiency letter dt. 01.04.08 was issued to the institution for the following Society, 1) The affidavit submitted in not in the prescribed format. Mahabubnag ar 2) The building plan submitted is to approved by the competent Government Authority AP 3) The building plan submitted and the lane documents submitted does not match survey numbers/ Plot numbers/ Places are at different placed. 4) The Land usage certificate from the competent Government authority is not submitted. 5) Encumbrance certificate issued by competent Government authority is not issued. 65 1

6) Fixed deposit receipt of Rs.3.00 Lakhs submitted towards Reserve fund is not from the Nationalized Bank. 7) The Undertaking in prescribed format is not submitted. The institution was given 90 days time to fulfill the deficiencies. The file has been closed as per MIS list as no closure order is found in the file. The institution has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 8865 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh verses NCTE-SRC, Principal Secretary, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and The Director of School Education, Hyderabad as first, second and third respondents respectively.

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad after hearing the arguments of Advocate of Petitioner and directed to issue Show Cause Notice on 01.04.2011 to respondents herein to show cause as to why this WP should not be admitted in the circumstances set out in the petition and affidavit filed in the WP. Post after two weeks. Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad passed an order in WP 8865 of 2011 on 21.04.2011 as mentioned below” This WP is filed seeking a direction by way of Mamdus to declare the action of respondents in not considering the application of the petitioner society from grant of permission for running a D.Ed Course from the academic year 2011-12 as arbitrary and illegal. St Mary’s College of Education has submitted an application st.20.12.2007 seeking permission to run D.Ed Course. The application of the petitioner was processed and ultimately letter dt.01.04.2008 was issued to the college pointing out certain deficiencies. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though it is intending to comply with the objections and deficiencies pointed out by the respondents. The respondents are not acceding to the request of the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on a judgment of this Court in the case of AP GIRIJANA SEVAKA SANGH vs National Council for Teacher Education and others, rendered in WP No. 6712 of 2009 , Wherein a learned single judge of this Court has held that once an application is filed, it has to be considered with reference to the policy which was in force at the time when the application was made. He further contended that the respondents are not acceding to the request of the petitioner mainly on the ground of change in the policy, which is contrary to the aforesaid judgment on this court . As it is stated that the petitioner is yet to comply with the deficiencies pointed out in the letter dt. 01.04.2008. I deem it appropriate to dispose of the WP with a direction to the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner to start D.Ed Course as per policy. Which was in force at the time when the petitioner has applied for grant of permission to run the said course. Subject to the petitioner complying with the objections/ deficiencies pointed out by the respondents in the letter dt 01.04.2008 Subject to the above directions, the W P is disposed of No costs

The Court order along with file placed before SRC for direction/ decision.

Note : File is not closed for change of policy as seen from the records available . The Court orders is seeking to reopen the case which was closed for not adhering to time frame stipulated by NCTE Act / Regulation . In similar matters advocate has been requested to file appeals

To process on resubmission of the original application along with all the relevant documents as originally submitted along with this application.

51. APS02742 ST. Martin’s Educational Society, # 294, Comsary Bazaar, New Bowenpally, D.Ed Secunderabad- 500 011 had submitted an application on13.01.2004 to NCTE-SRC for 66 1

St. Martin’s grant of recognition for D.Ed. course of one year duration to C.M. Institute of Elementary Educational Teacher Education. H.No.2-199, Shobana Colony, Balanagar, Kukatpally Municipality, Society, Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh. Secunderaba The application was scrutinized and deficiency letter was issued to the institution on d 01.10.2008. directing to submit documents within a period of 90 days as per the section AP 14(1) of the NCTE Regulation 2007.

SRC in its 135th meeting held on 7th – 8th June 2007 decided to treat the applications which have not submitted compliance’s as closed after expiry of 90 days of time as per the regulations of NCTE, 2005. A letter dt.31.10.2008 has been received from NCTE-Hqrs clarifying that all such cases where letter of deficiency has been issued but no reply has been received from the concerned institution within 90 days may be closed, in terms of section 7(1) of NCTE Regulations.

The Institution had failed to submit the reply within 90 days. After consideration of facts and also non submission of reply to the deficiency letter within the stipulated time, it was decided to close the application.

Therefore the application of C.M Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, Andhra Pradesh was closed vide order dt.02.03.2001 The Institution had approached NCTE-Hqrs for an Appeal. NCTE – Hqrs vide letter dt. 18.03.2011 has directed to send the original file of C.M. Institute of Elementary Teacher Education. H.No.2-199, Shobana Colony, Balanagar, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh to Hqrs required for appeal. Accordingly original file sent to Hqrs vide letter dt. 24.03.2011. Meantime the St. Martin’s Educational Society and C.M. Institute of Elementary Teacher Education have filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 2566 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh against NCTE-SRC and Principal Secretary, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh as first and second respondents respectively.

Now. Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh vide order dt.25th April 2011 has given directions as “ The Petitioners have prayed that directions be issued to the first respondent to consider their representation dt. 30.01.2004 for granting recognition to start D.Ed College. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the first respondent shall reconsider the aforementioned application file by the petitioners, in case the same is pending with the first respondent as on today, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy o this order. There shall be no orders as to costs”

52. APS09143 Krishnaveni Educational Society, C/o of Srinivasa Blood Bank, Near Railway gate,Tanaku 534 211 D.Ed West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of Master’s recognition to Master’s College of Elementary Teacher Education, Near Gowthami Solvents, Tetali – College of Tanuki , Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course on 03.12.2007. 67 1

Elementary Application of the Institution was processed and deficiency letter dt.25.01.08 Teacher In the deficiency letter it is mentioned about the period of 90 days time given to submit written Education, representation along with all required documents and also informed that in case of any deficiencies West stated above still remaining and not removed within 90 days time, no extension of time will be Godavari granted and any submissions received after 90 days will be treated as invalid . A reminder was also sent on 01.04.08 to set right the deficiencies AP One more letter dt.07.07.08 was sent to the Institution for Non compliance of the deficiency letter within 90 days period. Informing the institution about the deficiency letter dt.25.01.08 , reminder letter dt.01.04.08 sent and expiry of stipulated period of 90 days. Despite of all that a compliance is not complete. Consequent upon the direction of the SRC the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has been treated incomplete. Therefore the same is here by closed. Accordingly closure order was issued on 07.07.08 Krishnaveni Educational Society, Andhra Pradesh has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 9903 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad verses – NCTE- SRC and Principal Secretary, The State of Andhra Pradesh(SE Genl-ii) department as first and second respondents respectively against the above SRC order dt.07.07.2007. Without approaching to Appeal in NCTE-Hqrs under Section 18 of NCTE Act.

Hon’ ble High Court has passed an order dt.25.04.2011 in WP No. 9903 of 2011 as under

The complaint of the petitioner is with regard to the policy of the State of Andhra Pradesh in not permitting recognition of private B.Ed/D.Ed/ private physical education / private language pandit training colleges as communicated under the letter dt07.01.2009 addressed to the National Council for Teacher Education. Acting thereupon, vide proceeding dt 07.07.2008 the Council for Teacher Education rejected the name of the petitioner- Institution for grant of recognition to D.Ed course. The petitioner seeks a consequential direction to National Council for Teacher Education to grant recognition for the said course forthwith. The matter is squarely covered by the judgment, dt. 16.12.2009 in W.P No. 6712 of 2009, whereby a learned judge of this court held that the power of the state Government to review policy as to the necessity or otherwise of according permission to establish institutions. The learned judge observed that the right that accrues to such colleges could not be taken away on account of subsequent change of policy. In terms of the aforesaid decision, the writ petition is disposed of directing the National Council for Teacher Education to consider the petitioner’s case for granting permission for commencing D.Ed Course independently and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with lat , as expeditiously as possible No Order as to the Costs. The Order of the Hon’ble High Court order along with file placed before SRC for direction/ decision

The said lease is not covered under orders in WP 6712 / 2009 which is regarding cases closed due to changing policy decisions. In this case as per records the application is closed for non reply deficiencies vide letter dtd.07.07.08.

The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad, immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation 68 1

of minutes.

53. APS07938 Educationmotati Nagi Reddy Memorial Educational Society. -45,Paipad village and Post, B.Ed Waddepally Mandal, Alampur, Mahabubnagar- 509 126, Andhra Pradesh has submitted in the LNR College Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to LNR College of Education, H.No. of Education, 5-45,Paipad village and Post, Waddepally Mandal, Alampur, Mahabubnagar- 509 126, Andhra Mahabubnag Pradesh for B.Ed Course on 13.01.2006 Application of the Institution was processed and deficiency letter dt.17.02.07 was sent to the ar Institution communicating therewith the deficiencies and directing therewith fro removal of the same AP within 90 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter. The institution had not replied to the deficiency letter even expiry of stipulated period of 90 days. The matter of all such institutions was considered by the SRC in its 135 th meeting held on 7th and 9 June 2007 after careful consideration of all the aspects vis-avis regulatory provisions, the SRC decided to close the file and communicate the applicant institution to this effect. Accordingly letter dt.12.07.07 was sent to the Institution intimating about the directions of SRC that the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has been treated incomplete, Therefore the same is here by closed. No further correspondence whatsoever will be entertained in this regard. However, if you want to seek recognition for any teacher education course including the one which this application was submitted, you may make fresh application in the prescribed format. LNR College of Education, Mahabubnagar- 509 126, Andhra Pradesh has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 3765 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad verses – The Government of Andhra PradeshSRC and NCTE-SRC as first and second respondents respectively against the above SRC order dt.12.07.2007. The Hon’ ble High Court has passed an order dt.26.04.2011 in WP No. 3765 of 2011 as under

The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not conducting the inspection and not granting recognition for establishment of the College of Education at Palpad village, Wadepally Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. It is the case of the petitioners that they filed an application for setting up B.Ed College at Palpad village on 29.12.2006.Howeve the same was returned on the ground that numerous deficiencies were found in the said college. The petitioner, after removing the said deficiencies, filed a fresh application on 28.12.2007. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said application is not being considered by the respondents till date. The petitioner has also submitted a representation on 18.11.2010 before the 2nd Respondent, but the same has not been considered as yet. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dt. 18.11.201 because the petitioner has filed its earlier application on 29.12.2006 i.e prior to coming into force of the policy decision 07.01.2009. The respondents are directed to consider the application of the petitioner, expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. No. order as to costs.

The Court order along with file placed before SRC for direction/ decision

The Institution has stated to have filed a representation dt. 18.11.10 wherein it is mentioned that fresh application is resubmitted on 28.12.2007 clearing deficiencies communicated on 17.02.2007. This resubmission of fresh application is well after closure of the case vide letter dt.12.07.07 for non compliance of deficiencies with stipulated time as per NCTE regulations

The Committee considered the matter and decided to process the application on submission of copy of original application dt. 28.12.2007 and related supporting original documents as per the regulations within Four weeks from the date of confirmation of the Minutes.

54. APS08574 Srinivasa Educational Society, Sheriguda(N)Ibrahimaptnam(M), Rangareddy district. Andhra B.Ed Pradesh, submitted to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition to Sri Chakra SriChakra College of Education.Sy.No. 209, Sheriguda(V) Ibrahimaptnam(M), Rangareddy College of district. Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course on 10.12.2007. But file has closed as per MIS list. No Education, closure order was found in the file. Rangareddy Srinivasa Educational Society, Sheriguda(N)Ibrahimaptnam(M), Rangareddy district. Andhra AP Pradesh,has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 11719 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad verses – NCTE- SRC, The Government of AP, Rep, by its Secretary School Education deportment and The Director of School Education, Hyderabad as first, second and third respondents respectively against the above SRC order dt.07.07.2007.

Hon’ ble High Court has passed an order dt.25.04.2011 in WP No. 9903 of 2011 as under

The complaint of the petitioner is with regard to the policy of the State of Andhra Pradesh in not permitting recognition of private B.Ed/D.Ed/ private physical education / private language pandit training colleges as communicated under the letter dt07.01.2009 addressed to the National Council for Teacher Education. Acting thereupon, vide proceeding dt 16.04.2009 the National Council l for Teacher Education rejected the name of the petitioner- Institution for grant of recognition to D.Ed course. The petitioner seeks a consequential direction to National Council for Teacher Education rejected the names of the petitioners- Institutions for grant of recognition to B.Ed course. The petitioners seek a consequential direction to National Council for Teacher Education to grant recognition for the said course forthwith The matter is squarely covered by the judgment, dt. 16.12.2009 in W.P No. 6712 of 2009, thereby, a learned judge of this court held that the power of the state Government to review policy as to the necessity or otherwise of according permission to establish new colleges could not be extended to existing institutions. The learned judge observed that the right that accrues to such colleges could not be taken away on account of subsequent change of policy. In terms of the aforestated decision, the writ petition is disposed of directing the National Council for Teacher Education to consider the petitioner’s case for granting permission for commencing B.Ed Course independently and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as expeditiously as possible No Order as to the Costs.

Note: WP received in the above case to office and no counter affidavit could be filed. Appeal against the order not filed .

The Committee considered the matter and decided to process the application on submission of original application dt. 10.12.2007and related supporting original documents as per the regulations, within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the Minutes.

55. APS02594 St. Francis Educational Society, B1, III Floor, M.J. Apartments, CPL Road, Amberpet, D.Ed Hyderabad submitted an application on 03.02.2004 to the Southern Regional Committee Francis of NCTE for grant of recognition to St. Francis College of Elementary Teacher Education, College of Gandhinagar, Jangoan Road, Suryapet, Nalgonda District , Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Elementary Course. Under NCTE notification dt. 15.01.2004 dispensed with the requirement of NOC Teacher of the State Government from the Institutions for grant of recognition to Elementary

Education, Teacher Education courses under Sarva Shikshana Abhiyan (SSA) Nalgonda The application was under process and in the meantime, the Government of Andhra AP Pradesh , Hyderabad field a Writ Petition No. 22866 of 2005 in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad challenging the Notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The WP was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the State Government is bad. Against the said judgment a Writ Appeal No. 692 of 2006 was filed in the division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad. Many discussion took place between the State Government and Andhra Pradesh and SRC –NCTE. However, neither State Government withdrew the case filed by them nor the stay has been vacated. In meantime some institutions went to the Court and filed writ petitions individually, seeking directions for processing of their application, in one such Writ petition No. 8278 of 2008. The Hon’ble High Court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as on date. As per the direction of Hon’ble High Court and decision of SRC for processing of pending D.Ed applications as per the new regulations of NCTE in its 174th meeting held on 20 September 2008, in the SRC started to process the applications. In view of the above decision, a deficiency letter dt. 20.09.2008 was issued to the Institution directing to submit following documents within a period of 90 days as per Section 7(1) of NCTE regulations 2007. 1. Land documents on owner ship basis having minimum 2500 sq mtrs area with its English translation attested to be true copy. 2. Building plan in original duly approved by the competent authority mentioning Sy. No./ \Plot No. on the land mentioned in point No.1 above. 3. Building completion certificate approved by the competent authority stating the location of building. Sy.No.. Total built-up area. 4. Land use certificate from the Government Authority along with the encumbrance certificate. 5. Original affidavit relating to details of land processed on Rs.100/- stamp paper attested by the Notary Public in the enclosed format. 6. Fixed deposit receipt (FDR) for Five Lakhs from Nationalized Bank for the current year to be submitted. As per para 9(1) of regulations “ there shall be reserve fund of Rs.3.00 Lakhs per course per unit in form of a fixed deposit for a duration of 5 yrs of Nationalized bank. SRC in its 135th meeting held on 7th & 8th June 2007 decided to the applications which have not submitted compliance’ as closed after expiry of 90 days time as per the regulations of NCTE,2005.A letter dt. 31.10.2008 has been received from the NCTE-Hqrs clarifying that all such cases where letter of deficiency has been issued but reply has been received from the concerned institution within 90 days may also be closed term of section 7(1) of NCTE regulation. The institution has failed to submit the reply within 90 days. After consideration of facts and also no-submission of reply to the efficiency letter within the stipulated time, it is decided to close the application and closure order issued on 27/02/2009. The institution has approached in the Hon’ble High in writ petition no. 12412 of 2011 without approaching to appeal committee, NCTE HQ under section 18 of NCTE Act, 71 1

The institution has filed a court case vide Writ petition No. 12412 of 2011 in the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh verses NCTE-SRC and NCTE-Hqrs as first and second respondents respectively.

Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad passed an common order in WP 9620, 12219, 12396, 12400, 12404, 12412 and 12419 of 2011 on 27.04.2011 as mentioned below

“ The short prayer made by the petitioners in these Writ Petitions is that they may be permitted to make applications before the second respondent seeking relaxation of the cut- off date for compliance of the deficiencies as prescribed under regulation 7 of the NCTE Regulations, 2009. After hearing the learned council for the petitioners I am of the considered opinion that no prejudice would be caused to either of the parties in case the petitioners are permitted to make applications seeking more time to do away with the deficiencies. In view of the above, the petitioners are permitted to move the applications as prayed for under Regulation ii of the NCTE Regulations, 2009. In case the applications are filed , the same shall be considered within a period of three weeks thereafter.

The committee decided to arrange to file an Appeal against the orders of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad immediately and also to arrange for getting the judgment stayed with immediate effect, without waiting for confirmation of minutes.

56. APS04730 Little Rose College of Elementary Education, Draksharama, East Godavari- D.Ed 533262 , Andhra Pradesh Little Rose College of Elite Educational Society, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh had applied for Elementary grant of recognition to Little Rose College of Elementary Education, Draksharama, Teacher East Godavari=533262, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed course of Two year duration Education, under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, East NCTE. Godavari The competent authority had constituted a Visiting Team to visit the institution on AP 03.04.2007 and the visiting team had since submitted its report. SRC in its 141st meeting held on 6, 7, 8 & 9 September, 2007 the SRC after considering the report of the visiting team as well as other relevant materials furnished by the applicant institution, is satisfied that the applicant institution does not fulfill the requirements and issued a notice on 02.01.2008 to the applicant institution under provision to section 14(3) (b) of the NCTE Act, 1993, thereby giving an opportunity to the said applicant institution to make a written representation for the following:  The building is under construction  The labs and library is not established  Furniture is not adequate 72 1

The institution submitted its reply on 12.02.2008, placed in its 154th meeting held on 21st –22nd February, 2008, the SRC after considering the relevant materials furnished by the applicant institution, which came to the conclusion that recognition to the said institution for D.Ed course be refused for the following reason:  Building completion certificate is not submitted  The building is under construction  The labs and library is not established  Furniture is not adequate

Accordingly, a refusal order was issued to the institution on 14.03.2008, Aggrieved by the refusal order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority reverses the order appealed against in its order dated 18.08.2008, and instructed to cause re-inspection of the institution. Mean while a letter dated 07.01.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education is received requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the state of Andhra Pradesh as the above Colleges are exceeding in numbers than required. The matter was placed before SRC in its 173rd meeting held on 20th –23rd April, 2009 which came to the conclusion to close the application of the institution.

Therefore application of Little Rose College of Elementary Education, Draksharama, East Godavari=533262, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed course in terms of section 14(3)(B.Ed) of the NCTE Act, 1993, is hereby closed.

The institution ignored to approach Appellate Authority, NCTE Head Quarters and directly approached Hon’ble High Court in writ petition no 21/12/2011 wherein the Hon’ble High court passed an order as under

“In that view of the matter, having regard to the fact that the application of the first petitioner society is also prior to the present policy notified by the Government and the respondents considered such application applying the present policy of the Government, order bearing No.F.SRO/NCTE/2008-09/12360, dated 05.05.2009, rejecting the request of the first petitioner society to run, D.Ed College, is set aside and the respondents are directed to reconsider the application of the first petitioner society with reference to the policy, which was in force, during relevant year, when the application was initially submitted by it, and take steps accordingly, for grant of permission as prayed for”.

SRC in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March, 2011 It was decided to direct the institution to submit all relevant documents including the latest building completion certificate from a Govt. Engineer, evidence of Endowment and Reserve Fund deposits and others, for consideration, as per Court orders for further processing. Accordingly the letter was sent to the institution on 19.04.2011.The institution has submitted its original file along with FDR’s on letter dated 26.04.2011.

The SRC considered the Hon’ble High Court orders, written reply of the institution dt. 26.04.2011 and all the relevant documents by the institution and 73 1

decided to cause inspection at the premises.

57. APS05798 National College of Teacher Education, Ernakulam Dt., Kerala was M.Ed recognized by SRC, NCTE for M.Ed. course on 01.10.2007. National College of A complaint has been received from Prof. P.C. Krishnan, Secretary, Teacher Educational Reforms Forum, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala on 5.5.2009. Education, The complainant made complaints against 21 institutions, which are Ernakulam functioning in the State of Kerala. All the institutions were granted KL recognitions during 2002-2006. The complainant has stated that the B.Ed. and M.Ed. un-aided institutions in Kerala noticed serious defects like infrastructural and instructional facilities available in these institutions. The complainant is requesting SRC-NCTE to conduct a surprise inspection to confirm the authenticity of the complaints made.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 175th meeting held on 13th and 14th May, 2009. The Committee decided to issue showcause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly notice was issued to the above institutions on 4.6.2009 for the following reasons:-

 The institution does not possess qualified Professor, Reader and Lecturer for conducting the M.Ed. course.  The infrastructural facilities have not been provided for PG course in education.

The institution has replied to the Notice on 16.9.2009. The matter was considered by SRC and it has decided to cause inspection under Section 17 and ask the institution to submit the reply to the Questionnaire (for all courses including TTC). As per direction of Regional Committee a letter was issued to the institution on 03.12.2009. In response to this letter the institution has submitted Questionnaire for M.Ed course. Inspection under Section 17 was conducted to the institution on 22.3.2010.

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, visiting team report under section 17 of NCTE Act, the Regional Committee decided to withdraw recognition of B.Ed. (APS0628), M.Ed. course (APS05798) and B.Ed.-Addl. unit(APS06290) for the following grounds:-

 The institution is functioning in multi floor building complex which also houses part of a school run by the same Management. As evident from the VCD, all the teacher education programmes of B.Ed., B.Ed. Addl. M.Ed. and TTC are run in the same building along with school

which is against the NCTE norms.

The VT Report, giving the infrastructural data(built-up area etc.) and also duly countersigned by the Management of the institution, states the following:-

 The built-up area available and earmarked for Teacher education programmes are as follows: Actual requirement as per norms. B.Ed. & B.Ed. Addl. Batch : 1,390 sq.ft. 16,000 + 10,000 sq.ft. M.Ed. : 4,596 sq.ft. 6,000 sq.ft. TTC : 4,900 sq.ft. 11,000 sq.ft. ------Total : 20, 886 sq.ft. 43,000 sq.ft. ------ Thus as per the above break-up, against the required built-up area of 43,000 sq.ft. as per the NCTE norms, for all the teacher education programmes, the available earmarked built-up area is only 20, 886 sq.ft. the shortage being as high as 22, 114 sq.ft.  In view of the fact that the available space will be adequate for the earliest approved TTC course ( and the remaining space will not be adequate for the remaining programmes), it is decided that approval for the programmes of B.Ed.(APS0628) and B.Ed. Addl. Intake(APS06290) and M.Ed.(APS05798) be withdrawn w.e.f. 2010- 2011. No further admission in these programme. The TTC programme alone be continued.  While, the visiting team has given the actual data on built-up area, it has made a wrong observation about its adequacy, for which separate action is contemplated.  The top floor housing Multi-purpose Seminar Hall is a temporary shed with tin sheet roof which is not acceptable as per NCTE norms.

As the management itself has concurred with the VT report on built-up area data,(through their counter signature), it was decided that there was no need for any further notice to be sent. Already an opportunity was given by the issue of Notice under Section 17 and the institution’s reply was duly considered. Now, the deficiencies had been admitted by the Management itself.

Now the institution has approached Appellate Authority. Accordingly, the Council hereby reverses the order appealed against with the direction to the SRC for restoring the recognition of the B.Ed. programme with an intake of 100 only and for addition unit of B.Ed programme & M.Ed programme the recognition stands withdrawn. 75 1

SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13th –14th October, 2010 considered the Appellate Authority Order Dt. 22.9.2010 of the institution, VCD and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to restore recognition to one unit of B.Ed only with an intake of 100 candidates only.

Whereas the recognition to M.Ed courses be withdrawn and further, it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The Affiliating body / Examining board / body may be informed accordingly for necessary enforcement.

The institution has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No. 29284/2010. The Hon’ble High Court has an order on 28.02.2011 vide W.P. No 4387 of 2011 reads as hereunder: “ Yet another grievance of the petitioner is that in respect of one batch of B.Ed course for which recognition has been restored by the 1st respondent as per Ext.P10, students are not allotted by the 3rd respondent. Now that recognition has been restored as per Ext.P10, petitioner is entitled to allotted students. Therefore, I direct the 3rd respondent to allot students to the B.Ed course offered by the petitioner on the strength of a copy of this judgment. Subject to the above, Ext.P10 will stand in all other respects. Writ petition is disposed of as above”.

SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March-1st April, 2011 decided to call for clarification on whether the undertaking given by the management to the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala that the Asbestos, roofed covering an area of 3000 sq.ft. would be replaced by RCC roof has been fulfilled. If so, the management be directed to produce documentary proof from a Govt. Engineer and an affidavit to the above effect, for taking further action including causing composite inspection for all the courses.

The institution has submitted documents on 06.05.2011 as per website as under:-

The committee considered the reply of the institution dt. 06.05.2011, and decided to cause Composite inspection of the institution on submission of Rs. 40000/- towards inspection fee for each of the courses being run under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

58. APS06003 An application was submitted by Sri Vidya College of Education,powrampet B.Ed Rangareddy,Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to B.Ed.,course in the office of Sri Vidya SRC-NCTE, Bangalore on 29.12.2005 College of The institution was issued a deficiency letter vide letter dt. 22.05.2006, giving a time Education, of 90 days for submitted the complaints to the effect that all the deficiencies Ranga communicated have been removed. The period of 90 days have been expired, but Reddy the applicant institute did not submit any reply. The matter of all such institutions AP were considered by SRC in its 135th meeting held on 7-8 June, 2007. The SRC decided to close the file and inform the institute about the decision, As per the decision of SRC, the letter was issued to the institution on 28.6.2007. 76 1

Court order has been received in the office of SRC on 25.04.2011 in writ petition no. 10438/2011 in the matter of Sri Saraswathi Vidya Nilayama Educational Society Vs National Council for Teacher Education through Regional Director. The Hon’ble High Court has passed an order dt. 18.04.2011 as under::

The petitioner has prayed that a direction be issued to the first respondent to permit the petitioner Educational Society to set up a B.Ed College. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though it has made an application on 02.01.2006 to conduct inspection of the petitioner’s proposed B.Ed college, but no orders have been passed till date.

It is settled principle of law that when ever an application is made, it must be considered and processed in accordance with the provisions of law or the policy that existed as on the date of presentation. Subsequent changes may apply to the applications that are made thereafter.

A perusal of the case file discloses that more than six years have elapsed since the date of filing of the application by the petitioner to set up B.Ed college. It seems that the petitioner has not pursued the said application in the proper manner.

The learnt Council for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition giving liberty to file fresh application and on such filing of the fresh application, the first respondent may be directed to consider the same in accordance with law expeditiously.

After hearing the learnt Council for the parties, the writ petition is disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh application to start B.Ed college. In case any such application is filed the first respondent shall consider and disposed of the same and to conduct inspection of the petitioner’s proposed B.Ed college, in accordance with law within a period of 6 weeks from the date of the receipt of the representation.

There shall be no order as to costs.

The committee has noted the Court directions in this matter.

The institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 19/05/2011 as per direction of court order:-

The Committee considered the matter and decided to process the new application for B.Ed as per Court directions, if the management files fresh applications as per Court directions and other related supporting original documents as per the regulations, within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the Minutes.

59. APS07676 Sivagamiammal Teacher Training Institute & College of Education, 77 1

APS07679 Kattinayanapalli, Krishnagiri District, Tamilnadu D.T.Ed B.Ed Bharath Educational Trust, Krishnagiri District, Tamilnadu has submitted an Sivagamiam applications to SRC-NCTE for seeking grant of recognition’s for B.Ed and D.T.Ed mal Teacher courses in the name and style of Sivagamiammal Teacher Training Training Institute(APS07676) and Sivagamiammal College of Education(APS07679), Krishnagiri, Tamilnadu on 14.12.2006 and 4.7.2007. Institute & College of The applications were processed and the inspections of the institutions were Education carried out and finally SRC-NCTE granted recognition’s to Sivagamiammal TN TTI, Krishnagiri vide order no. F.SRO/NCTE/D.T.Ed/2006-2007/16880 dated 11.1.2008 for D.T.Ed course with an intake of 50 students and Sivagamiammal College of Education, Krishnagiri vide order no. F.SRO/NCTE/B.Ed/2006-2007/18427 dated 28.2.2008 for B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students.

Meantime, Legal notice dated 10.3.2011 received from Shri. M. Tamil Mani, Advocate, 1/230, 6th Cross, Rajaji Nagar, Krishnagiri-635001, Tamilnadu under the instructions of Thiru. K. Arumugam, S/o Kolandai Gounder, Residing at No. 1/215/5, 3rd Cross, Rajaji Nagar, Krishnagiri-635001, Tamilnadu against the above said colleges. In this regard a letter has been sent to our Legal Counsel with the request to advice regarding course of action in this matter on 18.3.2011. Also a letter was sent to the complainant on 18.3.2011 to submit an affidavit on Rs. 10/- stamp paper about the authenticity and veracity of Legal Notice.

The matter was considered by SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011, the committee decided to call for remarks from the management by sending the copy of legal notice. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011.

The institution submitted its reply on 08.06.2011. Meanwhile, reply from the complainant i.e M. Tamil Mani has been received on 03.06.2011 and as stated as follows:

“On behalf of my client Mr. K. Arumugam, son of Kolandai Gounder, residing at No. 1/215/5, 3rd Cross, Rajaji Nagar, Krishnagiri, I have issued a complaint cum notice dated 10.03.2011, on the instructions given by my client. On 24.05.2011, the said M/s. Sivagamiammal College of Education has issued a letter to me and denied all the contents in my complaint dated 10.03.2011. I have tried at my best to contact my client to clarify and for gathering points to follow up action on the basis of the complaint and reply, but for all these days I have not received any instructions from my client. It seems he has no interest in this aspect. So through this letter I am declaring that no instructions from my client and I withdraw the complaint dated 10.03.2011 issued to you all in respect of M/s. Sivagamiammal College of Education. So you are requested to drop the matter as not pressed”.

The committee has noted the matter.

60. APS03031 Jaya College of Education, Chennai, Tamilnadu B.Ed Jaya College 78 1

of Education, Jaya College of Education, Chennai, Tamilnadu has submitted an Chennai application for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 30.12.2003. TN The application was processed and recognition to the institution for B.Ed course was granted on 22.11.2005 with an intake of 100 students at Indiranagar, Thiruniravur Post, Thiruvallur-602024, Tamilnadu.

Meanwhile, complaint received from Selva Mary through E-mail on 22.03.2011 against institutions in Tamilnadu which are not functioning properly with following defects like unqualified principals are heading the institutions, no infrastructure & human resource with proper qualification, some are conducting only week end classes, teachers are ill paid, even the Tamilnadu Teacher’s Education University has gone into corruption persons. The complainant has given list of institutions

SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the matter and decided to call for remarks on the complaint. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 10.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 20.05.2011 for the following.

The committee has considered the matter and decided that no further action is warranted.\ 61. APS00165 Government Teacher Training Institute, Gangavalli, Salem District, Tamilnadu D.T.Ed Government Government Teacher Training Institute, Gangavalli, Salem District, Tamilnadu has Teacher submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed course. Training Institute, The application was processed and recognition to the institution for D.T.Ed course Salem was granted on 24.01.2002 with an intake of 30 students. TN Meanwhile, Complaint received from the Students Association, Govt Teacher Training Institute, Gangavalli, Salem on 21.03.2011 against the Govt Teacher Training Institute, Gangavalli, Tamilnadu for various problems faced by the students like long distance, bogus teaching practice, bad conduct, teaching facilities & books facilities discrimination & partiality, minority language teaching faculty discrimination.

SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the matter and decided to call remarks on the complaint. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 10.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 20.05.2011 for the following:

62. APS03571 J.J. College of Education, Pudukottai District, Tamilnadu B.Ed J.J. College of Education, J.J College of Education, Pudukottai District, Tamilnadu has submitted an Pudukottai application for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 18.10.2004. TN 79 1

The application was processed and recognition to the institution for B.Ed course was granted on 23.06.2005 with an intake of 100 students at J.J. Nagar, Sivapuram, Namanasamudram Post, Pudukottai-622404, Tamilnadu.

Meanwhile, complaint received from Selva Mary through E-mail on 22.03.2011 against institutions in Tamilnadu which are not functioning properly with following defects like unqualified principals are heading the institutions, no infrastructure & human resource with proper qualification, some are conducting only week end classes, teachers are ill paid, even the Tamilnadu Teacher’s Education University has gone into corruption persons. The complainant has given list of institutions

SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the matter and decided to call remarks on the complaint. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 10.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 20.05.2011& 23.05.2011 for the following:

63. SRCAPP99 The District Muslim Society D.Ed College, No.243/1, Gajbarwadi, Hukkeri D.Ed Post, Belgaum District-591309, Karnataka The District Muslim The District Muslim Education Society D.Ed College, No.243/1, Gajbarwadi, Kukkeri Society D.Ed Post, Hukkeri, Belgaum District-591309, Karnataka had submitted an application College, seeking grant of recognition for D.Ed course on 06.11.2009. Belgaum KA Application was processed and a deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 22.12.2009. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 18.02.2010.

The SRC in its 190th meeting held on March 29-30 2010 considered the reply to the deficiency letter and decided to reject the application. Accordingly, a refusal order was issued to the institution on 28.04.2010.

Further, the institution preferred appeal and the appellate authority has reversed the rejection order of SRC vide order dated 15.09.2010. The SRC in its 197 th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the appellate authority order and decided to process the application on merits. Accordingly, application was processed and a Deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 11.01.2011. The institution has submitted its reply on 11.02.2011.

The SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 considered a reply of the institution and decided to cause inspection under Section 14 of NCTE Act. The inspection was carried out on 31.03.2011. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.

The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27-28 April, 2011 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the on 31.05.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 07.06.2011 80 1

along with VCD.

As seen from VCD, the building, where the proposed course is to be conducted is totally unsuitable for any Education programme and building appears to be warehouse/gowdown. The entire building shown in VCD has sheet doors and narrow corridors. The entire building appears to be used for other than educational purpose. The committee considered the VCD, the VT report, & reply of the management and decided to refuse the recognition to the institution. 64. SRCAPP65 Shadan College of Education, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. Course _ B.Ed B.Ed-AI Add. File Code- SRCAPP65. Shadan College of An application was submitted by Shadan Educational Society, Plot No-6-2-978. village Education, Khairatabad. Post-Khairatabad. Taluka – Khairatabad. Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh had Hyderabad applied for grant of recognition to Shadan College of Education. 6-2-978, Khairatabad, AP Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, for B.Ed (Al) intake from 160 seats to 200 seats course of one year duration under section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 29.10.2009.

The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 22.12.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 08.02.2010.

The SRC considered the matter in its 190th meeting held on 29th-30th March 2010 and on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents. NCTE Act 1993, regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the regional committee decided to reject the application on the following grounds:-

 Minority Status Certificate submitted is not from the competent authority.

Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the applicant institution on 03.05.2010.as per direction of Regional Committee. The Appellate Authority order dt. 23.08.2010 has remanded back the case to SRC with a direction to process the case further on merit.

The SRC considered the Appellate Authority order and decided to reprocess the application.

The institution has submitted the following in letter dt. 25.10.2010. Minority Certificate dated.16.08.1999 issued by Secretary, Minorities Welfare Department, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh. and Govt. of Andhra Pradesh order dt. 23.03.1999, extracts of memorandum of association and bye-laws is also for perusal in terms of observation in Appellate order dt. 23.08.2010.(Para 4).

The committee in its 199th meeting held on 23-24, December 2010 considered the written explanation to the notice and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection. The inspection was caused on 10.02.2011.

The Committee in its 203rd Meeting held on 31st March-1st April, 2011 considered the Appellate authority order dt. 23.08.2010, VT Report dated 10.02.2011, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Showcase Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following: 81 1

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

As per the decision of SRC Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 25.05.2011. institution submitted its reply on 13.05.2011

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD, reply of the institution and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice as to why the B.Ed-al course be not refused and also as to why all the three existing courses of the institution be not withdrawn, under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following grave deficiencies:

 The institution is running the following other courses/programmes (including other than Teacher Education) in the same building / premises (10 storyed building page No.4, 6 & 7 of reply) which is gross violation of the norms / regulations.

1.Shadan Institute of Management studies for boys 2. Shadan institute of Computer studies 3. Shadan Degree College for boys 4. Shadan Group of Modern Schools

The running of other courses along with Teacher Education Programme is not permissible as per NCTE norms/Regulations.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the proposed B.Ed-al course and also the existing B.Ed (APS00420), Pre School (APS02845) & D.Ed (APS02621) courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not refused/withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

65. SRCAPP425 Venkata Surya College of Physical Education, Vizianagaram ,Andhra Pradesh B.P.Ed submitted an application to SRC-NCTE for grant of recognition for B.P.Ed. course Venkata on online 01.10.10. Surya College of The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Physical Government for recommendation on 09.11.2010/04.02.2011 A deficiency letter Education, was issued to the institution on 09.12.2010 for the following Points:

Vizianagara m  Approved building plan by the competent civil authority :- AP Institution has submitted building plan but not earmarked area for existing course and proposed course. Hence the institution is required to submit fresh approved building plan. wherein it should be clearly mentioning i.e Khashara no, plot no, proposed course, total area, built up area duly approved by competent authority with resolution in all respect either or English or Hindi language. If the institution has running other teacher education courses/ other technical courses in the same premises then, the institution shall submit earmarked area for proposed course with total area and built up area.  Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has not submitted land use certificate . Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of LUC (Agriculture lands -conversion of Non - Agricultural purpose) issued by Revenue Department  Building completion certificate:- The institution has not submitted building completion certificate. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority/in prescribe format. (copy enclosed)  The institution is required to submit a copy of bye- laws/Registration of society/Trust in case of private institution.  Duly certified/notarized copy of registered sale deed to be filed.

The committee considered the reply of institution dt. 08/02/2011 for the deficiencies and decided to cause inspection of the institution under Section 14 of NCTE Act to verify the infrastructural and instructional facilities. The inspection was conducted on 07.04.2011.(to check the date)

SRCin its 204th meeting held on 14-15 March, 2011, considered the VT report, VCD and all other documents of institution and decided to serve show cause notice.

Accordingly show cause notice dt.25.05.2011 was issued to the institution. The institution has submitted reply dt.02.06.2011.

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to B.P.Ed course of two years duration with an annual intake of ( only)(one unit) for the academic year 2011-12 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

66. SRCAPP386 Chaitanya College of Education, No.121/1, Nehrunagar, Kandulapuram, D.El.Ed Cumbum, Prakasam-523333, Andhra Pradesh. Chaitanya College of The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Education, Government for recommendation on 09.11.2010/02.02.2011. A deficiency letter 83 1

Prakasam was issued to the institution on 09.12.2010 for the following Points: AP 1. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Endowment funds- the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds vide no 061554 dated 27.09.2010 for five years issued by State Bank of Hyderabad. Hence the institution is required to submit original fresh FDR issued for proposed course as per regulation.

2. Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved fund vide no 061555 dated 28.09.2010 for five years issued by State Bank of Hyderabad. Hence the institution is required to submit fresh original FDR issued for proposed course as per regulation.

3. Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has submitted the copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority but it is not notarized. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands –conversion to Non – Agricultural purpose) issued by competent authority.

4. Building completion certificate:- The institution has submitted the building completion certificate but it is not in prescribed format and not issued by local civil authority. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed format. (copy enclosed)

5. Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs 100/ stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or Notary public, stating the precise location of the land (village, district, state etc) the total area in possession, the permission of the competent authority to use the land for educational purpose and mode of possession i.e. ownership or lease: - the institution has submitted photocopy of affidavit of Rs 100/- stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or Notary public. Hence the institution is required to submit original affidavit of Rs 100/- stamp paper. LUC referred in affidavit does not tally with LUC filed by institution.

6. Minority Certificate:- the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in this regard. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority.

7. Survey No. mentioned in the land documents and affidavit is 121/1 but the No. mentioned in the building plan is 25/A2B. Hence the institution is required clarify the same.

The inspection of the institution was conducted on 31.03.2011.

As per direction of SRC in its meeting 204th show cause notice was issued on 26.05.2011, the institution has submitted its reply for the deficiency.

On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two years duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year 2011-12 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

67. APS07460 :- Mother Theresa D.Ed College, Suryapet, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh, D.Ed Course :- D.Ed. Mother Theresa An application was submitted by Solmanraj Educational Society, Suryapet, Nalgonda for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, D.Ed vide dated 27.09.2006 College, Hyderabad The file was processed and this office letter dated 21.11.20006 communicating AP therewith the deficiencies and directing therewith for removal of the same within 90 days from the date of issue of the deficiency letter as per the provisions contained in the NCTE Regulation dated 13.01.2006. On perusal of the application it was noted that the stipulated period of 90 days has been expired and the institution has not complied to the letters dated 21.05.2007, 31.07.2007 & 17.09.2007. Consequent upon the direction of the SRC the application submitted for grant of teacher education course has been treated incomplete.

As per the decision of SRC the application was closed on 01.02.2008.

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.20439/2010 without exhausting remedy of appeal to appellate authority under section 18 of NCTE Act.

Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order as hereunder: “ The petitioner intended to established a College of Education at Suryapet, Nalgonda District. The National Council for Teacher Education, first respondent herein, had to accord approval for this purpose. Application dated 27.09.2006 was made to it by the petitioner enclosing the required documents and remitting an amount of Rs.40000/- for the purpose of inspection of the proposed college. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner complaining that the first respondent had not taken any steps to inspect the proposed college. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent. The State Government is said to have reviewed the situation as to the necessity of according permission to establish new colleges of education in the State in 85 1

future and by its letter dated 07.01.2009 communicated its policy decision to the first respondent that the existing institutions were adequate. However, the right that is accrued to the petitioner on the basis of its application and the consideration thereof by the first respondent cannot be taken away on account of the change of policy. It is settled principle of law that whenever an application is made, it must be considered and processed in accordance with the provisions of law or the policy that existed as on the date of its presentation. Subsequent changes may apply to the applications that are made thereafter.

Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent(SRC) to take necessary steps in the matter and pass appropriate orders. No order as to costs.” SRC considered the matter in its 197th meeting 13th – 14th October 2010 and directed the Management/institution to resubmit the old application returned by SRC along with necessary documents as originally submitted relating to land, building, FDR, Application fee, Building Completion Certificate from competent Government Engineer/authority and other relevant aspects for processing and for necessary action.

As per the decision of SRC a letter was issued to the institution on 19.10.2010 and a deficiency letter was issued on 18.11.2010. In reply to our letter dated 18.11.2010 institution has submitted its reply on 22.11.2010 & 27.12.2010. From the reply it is found that the institution purchased land only on 14/05/2008 and 20/05/2008 after submission of the initial application on 27.9.2006. The committee in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the written explanation to the notice and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection The land and building is on lease for 30 years as per Regulation 2006. How ever lease deed is of November 2010.

1. The institution has submitted two sale deed dated 20.05.2008 and 14.05.2008 now in favor of Maram Venkata Reddy and Damidi Prabhakar Reddy for S.No. 316 & 316/E, Bechirag village, Suryapet, Nalgonda S.No. 316 & 65 in the same village respectively. The sales deeds are not in the name of society or institution and they are of a date subsequent to the application date. In the initial application which was processed and closed the land document was a sale deed for sy. No. 215/A3, 215/A1,215/B2 and building plan was for S.No. 9 at Suryapet. The application was closed for non reply to Dl. 2. Along with resubmitted application a private lease deed of 10/11/2010 has been submitted for S.No. 316 & 316E, leased out by private party Maram Veakat Reddy to Solman Raju Educational Society which is not in accordance with regulation 2009. Even if the application is taken to be of 2006. The lease deed is a subsequent one of 4 years late. The institution’s application is not closed due to any change in policy but for not replying to 86 1

DL in time as per notes in the main files letter dt. 01.2.2008 refers. The inspection of the institution was done on 28.03.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice for the following:

 The VCD received is not functioning.

 A Certificate from the Government Affiliating body to the effect that no other programme is being run by the institution in the same building / Campus, along with the existing Course B.Ed to be submitted.

 The institution has submitted two sale deed dated 20.05.2008 and 14.05.2008 now in favor of Maram Venkata Reddy and Damidi Prabhakar Reddy for S.No. 316 & 316/E, Bechirag village, Suryapet, Nalgonda S.No. 316 & 65 in the same village respectively. The sales deeds are not in the name of society or institution and they are of a date subsequent to the application date. In the initial application which was processed and closed the land document was a sale deed for sy. No. 215/A3, 215/A1,215/B2 and building plan was for S.No. 9 at Suryapet. The application was closed for non reply to Dl.  Along with resubmitted application a private lease deed of 10/11/2010 has been submitted for S.No. 316 & 316E, leased out by private party Maram Veakat Reddy to Solman Raju Educational Society which is not in accordance with regulation 2009. Even if the application is taken to be of 2006. The lease deed is a subsequent one of 4 years late. The institution’s application is not closed due to any change in policy but for not replying to DL in time as per notes in the main files letter dt. 01.2.2008 refers. In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the refusal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

Chairperson, SRC, NCTE has directed on 23.05.2011 to include records land documents in SCN which is already reflected in minutes note:- 1 and 2 and same be placed in SRC meeting for information and rectification. .

As directed SCN has been issued on 26.05.2011 for the following as the institution did not possess the land on the date of application to NCTE.

The committee after going through the reply of institution dt.4.6.2011, come to the conclusion that the reply is not satisfactory and not convincing and hence, the recognition is refused.

68. APS04713 Samy Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu D.T.Ed Samy Samy Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu submitted Teacher an application for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed course. Training Institute, The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the Dharmapuri institution on 23.10.2006 at Nachinampatti Village, H. Doddampatti Post, TN Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

Meanwhile the Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai- 600006 forwarded a copy of inspection report of the institutions conducted by Principal, District Institute of Education and Training. As per the Reports of inspection of the institution conducted by Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai, the committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 decided to issue show cause notices.

Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 15.04.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 01.06.2011 for the following:

 The institution is functioning in an old Rice mill building roofing with fully asbestos sheets. In the rice mill, a long wall is being temporarily separated as class rooms and for the other purposes of the institute. The class rooms and other available rooms have not proper ventilation and no sufficient area for conduct of classes as per the rules and norms of NCTE.  The institute has no proper water facilities for toilets, which are provided for girls and boys of the institute. There is no proper drinking water facility to the students.  The materials and science articles available in the laboratory are not in position to use by the students; similarly, the library books in the library are not relevant.  The institute consists of only one approved staff and two unapproved staff and there is no adequate staff is working as per NCTE norms  The management of the institution has not yet shifted to the new building and the institute is still functioning in the same rice mill building which has been leased for 30 years.

As the management reply dt. 1.06.2011 is not satisfactory, it was decided to withdraw recognition of the institution as under:

Under the above grounds, the Committee decides to withdraw the recognition for D.T.Ed. course run by Samy Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri District, Tamilnadu, with effect from 2012-13 to enable the present batch of student to complete the course.

But, it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.

The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited 88 1

with SRC NCTE, Bangalore.

69. APS05334 B.Ed Menakshi Ramasamy College of Education, Perambalur District, Menakshi Tamilnadu Ramasamy College of Meenakshe Ramasamy Educational Trust, Perambalur submitted an application in the Education, name and style of Menakshi Ramasamy College of Education, Perambalur District, Perambalur Tamilnadu for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 29.12.2005 with the condition TN to shift to own premises within 3 years from the date of recognition.

The application was processed and the inspection of the institution was carried out on 24.09.2006. Recognition order was issued to the institution on 13.11.2006 at Menakshi Ramasamy College of Education, M.R. Kalvinagar, Trichy Main Road, Thathanur Post, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Perambalur District, Tamilnadu.

The Tamilnadu Teachers Education University forwarded a copy of show cause notice issued to the institution for not functioning in accordance with the conditions stipulated by the NCTE, SRC, Bangalore and Tamilnadu Teachers Education University as could be apprehended from the report of Inspection commission which caused a surprise visit to the colleges. The committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the matter related to the institution and decided to issue show cause notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following, on the basis of surprise visit to the above colleges from inspection committee of the Tamil nadu Teachers Education University Chennai. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 09.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 01.06.2011 for the following:

The committee considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at the premises in anticipation of payment of inspection fee of Rs. 40000/- per course, by the institution, Under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

70. APS08247 B.Ed Menakshi Ramasamy College of Education, Perambalur District, Menakshi Tamilnadu Ramasamy College of Education, Meenachi Ramasamy Educational Trust, Perambalur submitted an application in the name Perambalur and style of Menakshi Ramasamy College of Education, Perambalur District, Tamilnadu for TN seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 08.01.2007.

The application was processed and the inspection of the institution was carried out on 27.06.2007. Recognition order was issued to the institution on 27.09.2007 at Menakshi Ramasamy College of Education, Thathanur Post, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Perambalur District, Tamilnadu.

The Tamilnadu Teachers Education University forwarded a copy of show cause notice issued to the institution for not functioning in accordance with the conditions stipulated by the NCTE, SRC, Bangalore and Tamilnadu Teachers Education University as could be 89 1

apprehended from the report of Inspection commission which caused a surprise visit to the colleges. The committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the matter and decided to issue show cause notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following, on the basis of surprise visit to the above colleges from inspection committee of The Tamilnadu Teachers Education University Chennai. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 01.06.2011 for the following:

The committee considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at the premises in anticipation of inspection fee of Rs. 40000/- per course, Under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

71. APS09675 B.Ed Merit College of Education, Perambalur District, Tamilnadu Merit College of Education, Kumar Memorial Educational Trust, Perambalur submitted an application in the name and Perambalur style of Merit College of Education, Perambalur District, Tamilnadu for seeking grant of TN recognition for B.Ed course on 30.10.2008.

The application was processed and the inspection of the institution was carried out on 10.07.2009. Recognition order was issued to the institution on 28.07.2007 at Merit College of Education, No.630/1b3, Zameen Thatthanur, Udayarpalayam, Ariyalur District-621804, Tamilnadu.

The Tamilnadu Teachers Education University forwarded a copy of show cause notice dt.14.03.2011 issued to the institution for not functioning in accordance with the conditions stipulated by the NCTE, SRC, Bangalore and Tamilnadu Teachers Education University as could be apprehended from the report of Inspection commission which caused a surprise visit to the colleges. The committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the matter related to the institution and decided to issue show cause notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act on the basis of surprise visit to the above colleges from inspection committee of The Tamilnadu Teachers Education University Chennai. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 01.06.2011 for the following:

The committee considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at the premises in anticipation of inspection fee of Rs. 40000/- per course, Under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

72. SRCAPP334 An application was submitted by Success Hindi Pandit Training College, 4-218, HPT Nidzuru, Kurnool-518004, Andhra Pradesh for H.P.T course of one year duration to Success the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 30.09.2010. HPT College, Kurnool The application was processed and the deficiency letter was issued to the institution AP on 17.01.2011. The institution submitted its written representation on 09.03.2011.

The SRC considered the deficiency reply in its 202nd meeting held on 14th –15th March 2011 considered the reply of the institution dated 09.03.2011 for the deficiencies and decided to cause inspection of the institution under section 14 of NCTE Act to verify the infrastructural and instructional facilities.

The inspection of the institution was conducted on 01.04.2011.

The Committee in its 204th meeting held on 28th April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice.

As per the decision of SRC the show cause notice was issued on 26.05.2011. Institution submitted its reply on 07.06.2011.

On careful perusal of VT report, VCD and the original file of the institution, reply of the institution dt.07.06.2011 and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to H.P.T. course of one year duration with an annual intake of 100 (One hundred only)(one unit) for the academic year 2011-12 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session

73. APS05279 B.Ed Mariamman College of Education, Trichy, Tamilnadu Mariamman College of Thousu Periyakkal Educational Health & Charitable Trust, Trichy submitted an application in the name and style of Mariamman College of Education, Trichy for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course Education, on 02.01.2006. Trichy The application was processed and the recognition order was issued to the institution on 13.11.2006 TN at T.S.No.25, Ward No.8, Block No.17, Annamalai Nagar, Trichy-620018,Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dated 22.12.2010 alongwith inspection fee of Rs. 40000/-. The committee in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January, 2011 considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The inspection of the institution was fixed between 14th-18th March 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 03.03.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 17.03.2011. The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the reply to Show Cause Notice, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve the final Showcause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 06.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 03.06.2011.

Shifting B.Ed course :

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, VCD, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with

the original file of the institution, shifting of B.Ed (APS05279) course to new/permanent premises is permitted.

The committee also decided to issue show cause notice to D.T.Ed course for the following:

 The management is running D.T.Ed (APS04511) course with an intake of 100. The recognition order was issued to the institution to run the course on 18.12.2007 with a condition to shift to the new building/premises within 3 years, i.e., on or before 17.12.2010. But the institution has not shifted even a time period of more than 3 years and 6 months.

74. APS04202 B.Ed Arunachala College of Education, Thiruvannamalai District, APS07717 Tamilnadu M.Ed Arunachala Arunachala College of Education, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu submitted an College of application for seeking grant of recognition to B.Ed course on 29.12.2004. Education, Thiruvannam The application was processed and recognition was granted for offering B.Ed course with an alai intake of 100 students on 18.10.2005 at Old No.26, New No.74, Kosa street, TN Thiruvannamalai-606601, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

Some institutions, which have been granted recognition for the subsequent year, based on belated endorsements preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs. and contended that a few institutions which have submitted belated endorsements were granted recognition for the current academic year. SRC, in its comments to the NCTE-Hqrs. explained that this has occurred due to oversight and would modify such orders which have been wrongly issued. Pursuant to this, the NCTE-New Delhi vide order no.F.No.89-156/2005-Appeal dated 28th September, 2005 remanded back the cases to the SRC, Bangalore with a direction to reconsider the cases immediately for granting recognition from 2005-2006 at par with other similar cases who have been granted recognition for 2005-2006.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 103rd meeting held on 27th and 28th October, 2005 and SRC after obtaining a considered legal opinion in this regard, had taken decision to review its recognition orders issued for the session 2006-2007 and to grant recognition for the session 2005-06 to those institutions who have submitted belated NOC’s/Endorsements 92 1

as one time exception.

SRC in its 104th meeting held on 9th November 2005 decided to extend the relaxation to the institutions which have submitted other essential documents mentioned in Appendix 1B, belatedly. Accordingly, as per Public Notice of SRC, a modified recognition order was issued to the institution vide order no. F.TN/SEC/SRO/NCTE/2005-2006/3817 dated 03.11.2005 for B.Ed course from the academic session 2005-06.

SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20-21st August 2009 where in it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for further action. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 15.09.2009. The institution did not submit its reply.

The list of institutions where notices were returned undelivered and reply not received were published in the website on 20.7.2010 giving 10 days to submit reply. The institution did not submitted its reply.

SRC considered the matter in its 196th meeting held on 15th-16th September 2010 and decided to issue notice. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 26.10.2010. The institution has submitted its written representation alongwith DD of Rs.40000/- towards inspection fee on 06.12.2010.

The committee in its 199th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December 2011 considered the written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause Shifting inspection at the new premises and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly the shifting inspection of the institution was fixed between 14th-18th March 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 03.03.2011. Inspection of the institution was conducted on 15.03.2011.

The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 03.06.2011.

The management is also running M.Ed (APS07717) course in the same building.

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution vide letter dt.03.06.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 The Original Building Completion Certificate from competent Govt. engineer is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to Final issue a Show cause Notice to all the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal,

based on the records available with no further notice.

75. APS04408 T.E. Thiyagaraja Pillai I.A.S (Rtd) Teacher Training Institute, Trichy, D.T.Ed TamilnaduT.E. Thiyagaraja Pillai I.A.S (Rtd) Teacher Training Institute, KAP T.E. Visvanatham HR. SEC.School Campus, Thillainagar, Trichy, Tamilnadu was Thiyagaraja granted recognition for offering D.T.Ed course with an intake of 50 students Pillai IAS vide order dated 02.09.2006. (Rtd) Teacher The Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India, based on the Training enquiry report submitted by Sri.Sathyam, IAS (Retd) has directed NCTE for taking action. In th Institute, this regard, it has been envisaged that all the cases cleared by SRC in its 116 meeting Trichy held on 22-23 August 2006 should be re-inspected and the maintenance of Norms and Standards should be verified. TN The above institution was one amongst 71 institutions which was granted recognition in the 116th meeting. Based on the directions of MHRD, inspection under section 17 of the above institution was carried out on 17.12.2008. The VT report, VCD, original application file along with other documents were placed before SRC in its 170th meeting held on 16-17 February 2009. SRC decided to issue notice under section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a final showcause notice was issued to the institution on 02.04.2009.

The institution has submitted its reply on 12.05.2009, the matter was considered by SRC in its 180th meeting held on 29th July 2010 and the Committee considered the above matter and decided to conduct inspection for shifting of premises to permanent building after submission of the requisite documents. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 02.09.2010. The institution submitted its reply alongwith Rs.40000/- on 09.10.2009.

Meanwhile the institution vide its letter dated 20.12.2010 requested to give permanent approval for the existing place. The SRC considered the matter in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January 2011 and all relevant documents and decided to cause inspection to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme.

The shifting inspection of the institution was fixed between 14th-18th March 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 03.03.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 16.03.2011.

The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 02.06.2011 for the following:

 As per VT report the building in which D.T.Ed course is running now is a part of the KAP Viswanathan Higher Secondary school functioning in the 94 1

same building.

 The land is not registered in the name of the institution/trust. The lease deed is in favour of individual, which is against the NCTE regulations.

 Non-Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government authorized person/authority submitted is not clear to ascertain whether it is for same premises where institution is located.  Language learning lab is not available.

 As per VT report the library is common for both DTED course and the Hr.Secondary School, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

 Land usage certificate in English version is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to Final issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

76. APS04372 Vickram College of Education, Ariyalur District, Tamilnadu APS08862 B.Ed Vickram College of Education, Ariyalur District, Tamilnadu submitted an M.Ed application for grant of recognition for B.Ed & M.Ed course. Vickram College of The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the Education, institution on 08.11.2005 for B.Ed and 08.08.2008 for M.Ed course at Ariyalur Sreenivasa Garden, Enathi Village, Madurai-Sivangai Road, Sivagangai TN District-630561, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The Tamilnadu Teachers Education University forwarded a copy of show cause notice issued to the institution for not functioning in accordance with the conditions stipulated by the NCTE, SRC, Bangalore and Tamilnadu Teachers Education University as could be apprehended from the report of one-man commission which caused a surprise visit to the colleges. The institution was inspected by the university and show cause notice were issued on 02.03.11 by the university:

The committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 considered the matter and decided to issue show cause notice under Sec.17. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 15.04.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 27.05.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt. 27.05.2011and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution.

77. APS04543 Om Sri Vigneswara Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri APS07871 D.T.Ed District, Tamilnadu D.T.Ed-AI Om Sri Vigneshwara Om Sri Vigneswara Teacher Training Institute, Dharmapuri District, Teacher Tamilnadu submitted an application for grant of recognition for D.T.Ed Training course on 15.12.2005. Institute, Dharmapuri The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the TN institution on 12.09.2006 at No.2/969, A-V. S.K. Bharath Building, R.S. West, Sakthi Colony, Nelli Nagar, Kumarasamypet Post, Dharmapuri-636703, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India, based on the inquiry report submitted by Sri. Sathyam, IAS (Retd) has directed NCTE for taking action. In this regard, it has been envisaged that all the cases cleared by SRC in its 116th meeting held on 22-23 August 2006 should be re-inspected and the maintenance of Norms and Standards should be verified.

The above institution was one amongst 71 institutions which was granted recognition in the 116th meeting held on 22-23rd August 2006. Based on the directions of MHRD, inspection under section 17 of the above institution was carried out on 17.12.2008. The VT report, VCD, original application file along with other documents were placed before SRC in its 170th meeting held on 16-17 February 2009. SRC decided to issue notice under section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 02.04.2009. The institution submitted its reply on 30.04.2009.

SRC in its 178th meeting held on 13-14 July 2009 considered the reply and decided to issue showcause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for shifting of premises before 11.09.2009 and submission of inspection fees of Rs.40000/- along with requisite documents. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 31.07.2009. The institution submitted its reply on 31.07.2009.

SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20th-21st August 2009 considered the reply and decided to cause inspection under section 17 for shifting after submission of documents of new premises. Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 02.09.2009. The institution submitted its reply on 23.09.2009.

Meanwhile the Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai-600006 forwarded a copy of inspection report of the institutions conducted by Principal, District Institute of Education and Training. As per the Reports of inspection of the institution conducted by Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai, the committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 decided to issue show cause notices. The institution are directed to reply within 30 days from the date of the issue of show cause notices, failing which action will be taken against the institution, including

withdrawal of recognition with no further notice, based on the available evidences:- Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 15.04.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 16.05.2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.16.05.2011 and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution.

78. APS04492 JSR Teacher Training Institute, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu D.T.Ed JSR Teacher Training JSR Teacher Training Institute, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu has submitted an Institute, application for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed course on 08.12.2005. Coimbatore TN The application was processed and recognition to the institution for D.T.Ed course was granted on 20.06.2007 for annual intake of 50 students with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide letter dated 02.11.2010 submitted proposal for shifting of premises. SRC in its 198th Meeting held on 24th-26th November 2010 considered the written request and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause composite inspection at the new premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is directed to submit the following documents within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, Duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer, FDRs for Rs. 5 lakhs and 3 lakhs and other relevant documents. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 06.01.2011. Inspection of the institution was fixed between 14th-19h February 2011 and was intimated to the institution on 07.02.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was conducted on 17.02.2011. The Committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Showcause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.04.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 16.05.2011.

The committee considered the written reply and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause Re-inspection at the new premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee for each course towards the Teacher Education programme in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore 79. APS03053 Kalluppalam Teacher Training Institute, Kanyakumari District, D.T.Ed Kalluppalam Tamilnadu 97 1

Teacher Training Kalluppalam Teacher Training Institute, Kanyakumari District, Tamilnadu Institute, submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed course Kanyakumari on 31.12.2003. TN The application was processed and recognition order was issued to the institution on 12.01.2005 at Thiruthikonam, Edaicode Post, Kanyakumari District-629152, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years. Meanwhile the Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai-600006 forwarded a copy of inspection report of the institutions conducted by Principal, District Institute of Education and Training. As per the Reports of inspection of the institution conducted by Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai, the committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 decided to issue show cause notices. The institution is directed to reply within 30 days from the date of the issue of show cause notice, failing which action will be taken against the institution, including withdrawal of recognition with no further notice, based on the available evidences. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 15.04.2011.

The institution has replied vide letter dt. 16.05.2011 for the deficiencies pointed in the show cause notice and committee considered the replies and noted;

 The reply of the management to the show cause notice was duly considered. The management has admitted in their reply dt. 16.05.2011 that the institution is functioning in old building whidh is covered with Asbestos sheet roof and the management has not shifted to the new building/premises even after a lapse of 3 years.

The committee considered the reply to the Show Cause Notice dt. 15.04.2011 and as the reply is not satisfactory & not acceptable, the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the D.T.Ed course run by Kalluppalam Teacher Training Institute, Kanyakumari district, Tamilnadu, from the academic year 2012-13, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.

The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore if any.

80. APS00864 Kasthooribha Gandhi Teacher Training Institute, Namakkal District, APS00812 Tamilnadu D.T.Ed D.T.Ed-AI Kasthooribha Teacher Training Institute, Namakkal District, Tamilnadu submitted Kasthooribha was granted recognition to D.T.Ed on 22.6.2004 and D.T.Ed-AI on 25.08.2005 with Gandhi an annual intake of 100 students with the condition to shift the institution from 98 1

Teacher temporary to own premises within 3 years from the date of recognition. Training Institute, The institution vide its letter dated 07.02.2011 submitted Rs.40000/- for shifting of Namakkal premises. Inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was conducted on TN 21.02.2011.

The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 03.06.2011.:

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, VCD, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, shifting of D.T.Ed (APS00864), D.T.Ed-Al (APS00812) courses to new/permanent premises is permitted. 81. APS03018 Kasthooribha Gandhi College of Education, Namakkal District, Tamilnadu B.Ed Kasthooribha Gandhi Kasthooribha Gandhi College of Education, Namakkal District, Tamilnadu submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 22.12.2003. College of Education, The application was processed and recognition to the institution for B.Ed course was Namakkal granted on 08.09.2004 for annual intake of 100 students with the condition to shift the TN institution from temporary to own premises within 3 years from the date of recognition.

The institution vide its letter dated 17.09.2010 submitted Rs.40000/- for shifting of premises. The committee considered the matter in its 197th meeting held on 13th-14th October 2010 and decided to cause inspection. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 09.11.2010. The institution requested for postponement of inspection at the institution vide its letter dated 29.11.2010.

The inspection of the institution was refixed between 14th-17th February 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 17.01.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 21.02.2011

The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 03.06.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, VCD, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, shifting of B.Ed (APS03018) course to new/permanent premises is permitted. 82. APS08478 Kasthooribha Gandhi College of Education, Namakkal District, Tamilnadu M.Ed

Kasthooribha Kasthooribha Gandhi College of Education, Namakkal District, Tamilnadu submitted an Gandhi application for seeking grant of recognition for M.Ed course on 26.12.2007. College of Education, The application was processed and recognition to the institution for M.Ed course was Namakkal granted on 19.08.2008 for annual intake of 25 students & as per Regulation for enhancement of intake from 25 to 35 was issued on 24.8.2010 as per NCTE letter dated TN 30.7.2010.

The institution vide its letter dated 17.09.2010 submitted Rs.40000/- for shifting of premises. The committee considered the matter in its 197th meeting held on 13th-14th October 2010 and decided to cause inspection. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution on 09.11.2010. The institution requested for postponement of the institution vide letter dated 29.11.2010. Accordingly the inspection of the institution was refixed between 14 th-17th February 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 17.01.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 21.02.2011.

The Committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE.

Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 03.06.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, VCD, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, shifting of M.Ed (APS08478) course to new/permanent premises is permitted. 83. APS03602 Vignesh Teacher Training Institute, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu APS04451 D.T.Ed Vignesh Teacher Training Institute, Thandarampattu, Thiruvannamalai District, was granted D.T.Ed-AI recognition for offering D.T.Ed course with an annual intake of 50 students on 14.11.2005 Vignesh and D.T.Ed-AI with an intake of 50 on 20.09.2006 at 297/50A/5, Thandarampattu Road, Thiruvannamalai District-606601, Tamilnadu with the condition to shift the institution from Teacher temporary to own premises within 3 years from the date of recognition. Training Institute, The institution vide its letter dated 30.12.2010 alongwith Rs. 40000/- submitted proposal for Thiruvannam shifting of premises. The committee in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January 2011 alai considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite TN inspection for all the courses at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act.

The inspection for shifting of premises of the institution was fixed between 14 th-18th March 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 03.03.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 16.03.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, VCD, reply of the 100 1

institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, shifting of D.T.Ed (APS03602) & D.T.Ed-Al (APS04451) courses to new/permanent premises is permitted. 84. APS04463 Vignesh Teacher Training Institute, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamilnadu B.Ed Vignesh Vignesh Teacher Training Institute, Thandarampattu, Thiruvannamalai District, was granted Teacher recognition for offering B.Ed course with an annual intake of 100 students on 20.11.2007. Training Institute, The institution vide its letter dated 31.12.2010 alongwith Rs. 40000/- submitted proposal for shifting of premises. The committee in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January 2011 Thiruvannam considered the written reply and other relevant documents and decided to cause composite alai inspection for all the courses at the premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution TN is directed to submit the essential documents within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, Duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer and other relevant documents, along with inspection fee of Rs. 40,000/-.for each of the course being run, in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.

Accordingly the shifting inspection of the institution was fixed between 7 th-11th February 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 31.01.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 07.02.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, VCD, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, shifting of B.Ed (APS04463) course to new/permanent premises is permitted. 85. APS01490 National D.Ed Institute, Hafth Gumbad, Gulbarga-585104, Karnataka APS01830 APS09350 National D.Ed Institute, Hafth Gumbad, Gulbarga-585104, Karnataka has D.Ed submitted application for D.Ed course on 09.12.2003. The institution has been B.Ed granted recognition for D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on M.Ed 17.06.2005. National College of A letter No.ED 122 PTI 2008 (BO dated 18.06.2009 was received from the Principal Education, Secretary, Primary and Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Gulbarga Karnataka and has recommended SRC to withdraw the recognition granted to D.Ed KA course, as the institution is not mentioned Norms and Standards as prescribed by NCTE.

The matter was placed before SRC in its 178th meeting held on 13-14 July 2009. The committee decided to issue notice and notice was issued to the institution on 12.08.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 09.09.2009 & 14.09.2009. The SRC in its 183rd meeting held on 22nd September 2009 considered 101 1

the written representation and decided to conduct inspection.

A notice was issued to the institution on 31.10.2009. The institution has submitted its written representation on 24.11.2009 & 07.01.2010. The SRC in its 189th meeting held on 25-26 February 2010 considered the written representation and decided to cause inspection. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 04.06.2010. Then SRC in 193rd meeting held on 21-22 June 2010 considered the VT report and decided to withdraw recognition for D.Ed course. Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 02.08.2010.

Further, institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellate authority vide order dated 27.09.2010 has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC with direction to SRC to issue showcasuse notice to the institution.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the Appellate Authority order and decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the institution on 07.12.2010.

Further, the institution has submitted written representation on 04.01.2011. The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 considered the written representation of the institution and decided to cause Composite inspection. The institution is also running B.Ed and M.Ed courses. The inspection was carried out on 02.04.2011. The inspection report has been received along with VCD. The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th – 28th April, 2011 considered the VT report, VCD and the relevant documentary evidences an its was decided to issue Showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 01.06.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 02.06.2011 seeing Showcause notice appeared on website. The details are given below:

 The institution is running the existing three teacher education courses and is sharing the building with other programmes of Primary School, High School & a Degree College in the same building/premises, which is as gross violation of the regulations of NCTE.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Final Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

86. APS02555 Gayathri College of Elementary Teacher Education, Mahabubnagar, Andhra D.Ed Pradesh Gayathri College of An application was submitted by Gayathri Educational Society, Mahabubnagar Elementary District, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of Teacher SRC-NCTE, vide dated 03.02.2004 Education, Mahabubnag The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations ar of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to AP further recognise/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s).

The SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13 January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.

A letter dated 17.03.2009 has been received from NCTE, Hqrs informing that the “The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been decided that no further Recognition/ Permission to any institution in the State of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-2010 for B.Ed, D.Ed, and Physical Education courses also”. The State Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of this institution. The letters dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 was considered by SRC in its 172nd Meeting held on 25-26 March, 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Training Institutions in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to close the applications.

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.28641 of 2010 without approached to appellate authority.

Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 19.11.2010 vide W.P.No.28641 of 2010 reads as hereunder:

“ It may be true that the State Government as well as the first respondent have reviewed the situation as to the necessary or otherwise of according permission to

establish new colleges of education in the State in future and that the existing institutions are found to be adequate. However, the right that is accrued to the petitioners on the basis of their application and the consideration thereof by the first respondent cannot be taken away on account of the change of policy. It is settled principle of law that whenever an application is made, it must be considered and processed in accordance with the provisions of law that existed as on the date of presentation. Subsequent changes may apply to the applications that are made thereafter.

The institution was caused inspection by SRC on 29.04.2005. A deficiency letter dated 01.10.2008 was also issued and the institution replied on 20.01.2009.

Again a letter dated 09.01.2009 to institution was issued for submitting the following documents, which were submitted on 28.01.2009. 1. Affidavit dated 21.09.2009 2. Copy of Building Completion certificate (26,000 Sq.ft signed by Government Engineer) for S.No. 261/2 Tadiparthy, Andhra Pradesh. Copy of Land usage certificate from Tasildhar Apart from this the institution has submitted photo copies of FDR’s of Rs.5 lakhs and Rs.3 lakhs

In the mean while, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognize/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s) SRC decided to close the file vide order dated 29.04.2009.

The SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22-23 December 2010 considered the Hon’ble court orders and all the relevant documents by the institution and decided to cause inspection at the premises as the earlier visit was more than five year old dated 29.4.2005.The institution is directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, all the necessary documents for land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt. Engineer and other relevant documents along with Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee towards the B.Ed course in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore, for due consideration and necessary orders. The inspection was conducted on 10.02.2011.

The management is running B.Ed course in the same building/premises.

SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 of February, 2011 considered the Vt report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue show cause notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordinly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution for seeking clarification on 23.03.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 20.04.2011.

The committee considered the VT report, written reply of the institution vide letter dt. 20.04.2011 and decided to cause re-inspection of the institution on submission of all relevant documents and in anticipation of payment of Rs. 40000/- towards re-inspection fee.

87. APS07198 Sri Veda Narayana college of Education, 1-297, Lakshminagar, Puttur, B.Ed Chittoor-517583, Andhra Pradesh. Sri Veda Narayana Sri Veda Narayana college of Education, 1-297, Lakshminagar, Puttur, Chittoor- College of 517583, Andhra Pradesh, was granted recognition for B.Ed course with an annual Education, intake of 100 students vide order dated 26.06.2007. Chittoor The SRC, NCTE, Bangalore received a written remarks on the deficiencies pointed AP out by the Dean, Faculty of Education, Sri. Venkateshwara University, Tirupati, A.P.

SRC in its 195th Meeting held on 17-18 August, 2010 considered the letter received from S. V. University and decided to call for clarification from the institution. Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution for seeking clarification on 27.09.2010. The institution has submitted its clarification on 02.10.2010 and the details are as under.

SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December, 2010 considered the reply of the institution and it was decided to issue Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a notice was issued to the institution for seeking clarification on 11.02.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 30.03.2011.

The committee noted the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 30.03.2011

88. APS01431 S.J.U.P. D.Ed College, Harihar-577601, Davangere District, Karnataka APS05963 D.Ed S.J.U.P D.Ed College, Harihar-577601, Davangere District, Karnataka was granted D.Ed-AI recognition for offering D.Ed-AI course with an intake of 100 students vide order SJUP D.Ed dated 26.09.2007 which includes existing intake of 50 students and additional College, intake of 50 students. Davangere KA NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 10.02.2011 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 28.06.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to look into the matter to ascertain the adherence of relevant NCTE norms & standards by the institution and take appropriate action against institution.

The SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 considered the reply of the institution, VT report and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued the institution on 18.03.2011. The institution submitted its written representation on 24.05.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the 105 1

institution dt. 24.05.2011and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution.

89. APS02060 Santosh Teacher Training Institute, No.1167, Near Canara Bank, APS05525 Bangarpet-563114, Kolar District, Karnataka D.Ed D.Ed-AI Santosh Teacher Training No.1167, Near Canara Bank, Bangarpet – 563114, Kolar Santosh District, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed-AI course on Teacher 12.04.2007 with an intake of 100 students which includes existing intake of 50 Training students and additional intake of 50 students. Institute, Kolar NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 19.07.2010 has forwarded a copy of the inspection KA report dated 16.06.2010 conducted under section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 195th meeting held on 17-18 August 2010 considered the report of the institution and decided to issue notice. Accordingly, Notice was issued to the institution on 28.09.2010.

The institution did not care to respond to the notice issued on the institution even after lapse of six months.

The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April, 2011 has decided to issue Final Showcause notice to the institution for the following reason under section 17 of the NCTE Act, as the institution has not responded for the notice issued to the institution on 28.09.2010. Accordingly, Final Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 30.05.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the institution dt. 28.09.2010 and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution.

90. APS02315 Aryan B.Ed College, No.147, Vidyanagar Colony, Opp. Basaveshwara B.Ed Hospital, Sedam Road, Gulbarga-585105, Karnataka Aryan B.Ed College, Gulbarga Aryan B.Ed College, No.147, Vidyanagar Colony, Opp. Basaveshwara Hospital, KA Sedam Road, Gulbarga-585105, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course on 05.01.2005 with an intake of 100 students.

As per decision of SRC in its 175th meeting the office of SRC has reviewed the files of the institution who have been granted recognition either in a rented premises pending construction of own building or in lease premises.

A list of such institutions has been prepared and placed before SRC in its 176th meeting held on 27-28 May 2009 wherein, it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for further action. Notice was issued to the institution on 08.09.2009. The institution did not care to respond to the notice issued on the institution even after lapse of more than one and year .

The SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 considered the non- reply to the Notice and decided to issue Final Showcasue notice. Accordingly, Final Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 18.03.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 16.05.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution vide letter dt.03.06.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve another Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 Building plan of the new building duly approved by the Government authority is to be submitted.

 Land usage certificates from the concerned Government authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/sanctioned for educational purposes only should be submitted.

 Non-Encumbrance certificate in English version is to be submitted.

 Original FDR’s both for Rs. 5 lacs and 3 lacs in joint name from a Nationalised Bank is to be submitted.

 In affidavit, the total area of the land and total built up area not mentioned.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a another Final Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

91. APS01493 CMR College of Education, CMR Janardhana Trust, CA No.2,3 Cross, 6th A B.Ed Main, HRBR Layout, Kalyan Nagar, Bangalore-560043, Karnataka CMR College of Education, CMR College of Education, CMR Janardhana Trust, CA No. 2,3 Cross, 6th A Main, Bangalore HRBR Layout, Kalyan Nagar, Bangalore-560043, Karnataka was granted KA recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 25.11.2007.

The institution in its letter dated 16.10.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs.40,000/- towards shifting fee. The inspection was carried out on 24th November 2010. The inspection report has been received along with VCD. The inspection was carried out on 24.11.2010.

The SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22-23 December 2010 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue Showcause noitce. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 28.01.2010. The institution has submitted its written representation on 03.03.2011.

The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April, 2011 considered the written representation and decided to issue Final Showcause notice. Accordingly, Final Showcause notice was issued to the on 06.05.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 06.06.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution vide letter dt.06.06.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve another Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 The management is sharing the building used for running D.Ed & B.Ed programmes along with other courses namely. Pharmacy, Law, M.B.A & Nursing courses which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.

 Building and D.Ed courses are not in exclusive building meant for the Teacher Education Programme only.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue another final show cuase notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

92. APS01597 Anjuman Urdu D.Ed College, Alamour Peth- Ilkal (PO), Hungund Taluk, D.Ed Bagalkot District, Karnataka Anjuman Urdu D.Ed Anjuman Urdu D.Ed College, Alamour Peth- Il kal (PO), Hungund Taluk, Bagalkot College, District, Karnataka has been granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an Bagalkot intake of 50 students vide order dated 30.11.2004. KA The institution in its letter dated 11.10.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with Rs.40,000/- towards shifting fee. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 19.10.2010. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.

The SRC in its 196th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue showcause notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued to the issued on 11.01.2010. The institution has submitted its written representation on 31.01.2011.

The SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22-23 February 2011 considered the unsatisfactory reply to Showcause Notice, VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Final Showcause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, Final Showcause Notice was issued to the institution on 23.03.2011.

 Building completion certificate is found tampered and not in the prescribed format.  There is discrepancy in the built up area shown in the affidavit and a fresh affidavit on Rs.100/- stamp paper duly notarised is to be submitted.  The latest non-encumbrance certificate upto date is to be submitted.  Notarised Land Usage Certificate is to be submitted.  Language Learning Lab is not available.  Fixed Deposit Receipt of Rs.3.00 lakhs is not from Nationalised Bank and not in Joint name as per NCTE norms.

The institution has submitted its written representation on 23.03.2011.

As the management reply dt. 23.03.2011 to the Final Show Cause notice dt. 23.03.2011 is not satisfactory and not acceptable, it was decided to withdraw recognition of the instituin as under:

Under the above grounds, the Committee decides to withdraw the recognition for D.Ed.(APS01597) course run by Anjuman Urdu D.Ed College, Alamour Peth-Ilkal (PO). Hungund Taluk, Bagalkot District, Karnataka, with effect from 2012-13 to enable the present batch of student to complete the course.

But, it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.

The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore.

93. APS01615 Veerasaiva Vidyavardhaka Sanghas Teacher Training Institute, Vijayanagar D.Ed College Campus Amaravathi College Road, Hospet, Bellary District-583201, Veerasaiva Vidyavardha Karnataka ka Sanghas Veerasaiva Vidyavardhaka Sanghas Teacher Training Institute, Vijayanagar Teacher College Campus Amaravathi College Road, Hospet, Bellary District-583201, Training Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course of 50 students vide Institute, order dated 24.12.2004. Bellary 109 1

KA The institution in its letter dated 24.09.2007 has submitted a proposal for shifting of premises along with 40,000/- towards shifting fee. Inspection was carried out on 27th October 2010. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.

The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24-26 November 2010 considered the VT report and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue Showcause notice. Accordingly, Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 10.01.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 09.02.2011 and 28.02.2011.

The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the written representation of the institution and decided to issue Final Showcause notice. Accordingly, Final Showcause notice was issued to the on 05.05.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 16.05.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, and decided that shifting of D.Ed (APS01615) course to new/permanent premises is permitted 94. APS01652 Sri. Satyam College of Education, #195C, 8th Cross, M,V,Nagar, Koppagal B.Ed Road, Bellary-583103, Karnataka Sri. Satyam

College of th Education, Sri. Satyam College of Education, #195C, 8 Cross, M.V.Nagar, Koppagal Road, Bellary Bellary-583103, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering B.Ed with an intake KA of 100 students vide order dated 24.12.2005. As per decision of SRC in its 175th meeting the office of SRC has reviewed the files of the institution who have been granted recognition either in a rented premises pending construction of own building or in lease premises. A list of such institutions has been prepared and placed before SRC in its 176th meeting held on 27-28 May 2009 wherein, it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for further action. Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 01.09.2009.

The institution did not care to respond to the notice issued on the institution even after lapse of one year six months.

The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April, 2011 considered the matter of over one and a half year non- response of the institution and decided to issue Final Show cause notice. Accordingly, Final Showcause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 03.06.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, reply of the institution vide letter dt.03.06.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was

decided to serve another Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 In the building plan submitted the Sy.Nos. not mentioned.

 Building completion certificate from the competent Govt. Engineer is to be submitted.

 Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities in English version is to be submitted.

 Non-encumbrance certificate in English version is to be submitted.

 FDRs for Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards Endowment and reserve fund respectively in original is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a another Final Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

95. APS00938 Jesus Christ Teacher Training Institute for Women, Dharmapuri, Tamilnadu D.T.Ed Jesus Christ Jesus Christ Teacher Training Institute for Women, Dharmapuri, Tamilnadu Teacher has submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for D.T.Ed Training course on 31.12.2002. Institute for Women, The application was processed and recognition to the institution for D.T.Ed Dharmapuri course was granted on 09.09.2004 for annual intake of 50 students from the TN academic session 2004-2005 with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.

The institution vide its letter dated 27.07.2010 has submitted proposal for shifting. The institution has submitted Rs.40000/- . The matter was considered by the Committee in its 195th meeting held on 17th-18th August 2010 and it was decided to cause inspection of the institution for D.T.Ed. Course, under Section 17 of NCTE Act, after payment of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee and on submission of filled in Questionnaire, along with relevant supporting documents relating to building, land, including Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer and Land Use Certificate, within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the Minutes. Accordingly a letter has been issued to the institution to submit the documents.

The inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was carried out on 111 1

23.11.2010. The Committee in its 199th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December 2010 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Showcause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 01.02.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 10.03.2011. Meanwhile the Directorate of Teacher Education, Research and Training Chennai- 600006 forwarded a copy of inspection report of the institution which was also considered by the committee and decided to issue show cause notice for the following deficiencies as per DTERT report: -

The committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 has decided to issue Final Show Cause notice to the institution. Accordingly final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, and decided that shifting of D.T.Ed (APS00938) course to new/permanent premises is permitted 96. APS03664 Mahendra College of Education, Salem District, Tamilnadu B.Ed Mahendra College of Mahendra College of Education, Salem-Attur Road, Minnampalli Village, Valapadi Taluk, Education, Salem District-636140, Tamilnadu was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an Salem intake of 100 students vide order dated 21.09.2006. TN The Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India, based on the inquiry report submitted by Sri.Sathyam, IAS (Retd) has directed NCTE for taking action. In this regard, it has been envisaged that all the cases cleared by SRC in its 116th meeting held 22-23 August 2006 should be re-inspected and the maintenance of Norms and Standards should be verified.

The above institution was one amongst 71 institutions which was granted recognition in the 116th meeting. Based on the directions of MHRD, inspection under section 17 of the above institution was carried out on 16.12.2008. The VT report, VCD, original application file along with other documents were placed before SRC in its 169th meeting held on 12-13 January 2009. SRC decided to issue notice under section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a final showcause notice was issued to the institution on 05.03.2009.

Since the institution had not submitted its reply even after completion of stipulated period, the matter was considered by SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20-21 April 2010 and the Committee considered the above matter and decided to serve Final Notice. Accordingly final notice was issued on 01.06.2010. The institution submitted its reply on 16.06.2010.

The matter was considered by the Committee in its 194th meeting held on 21st-22nd July 2010 and it was decided to cause inspection of the institution for B.Ed. Course, under Section 17 of NCTE Act, after payment of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee and on submission of filled in Questionnaire, along with relevant supporting documents relating to building, land, including Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer and Land Use Certificate, within four weeks from the date of confirmation of the Minutes.

A letter was issued to the institution on 02.08.2010 to submit Rs. 40000/-. The institution submitted its reply on 18.08.2010 alongwith Rs. 40000/-. Another letter has been issued to the institution to submit filled in Questionnaire, along with relevant supporting documents relating to building, land, including Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer and Land Use Certificate on 03.09.2010.

Inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was conducted on 12.09.2010. SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13th-14th October, 2010 considered the VT report of the institution, VCD and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to seek clarification. Accordingly clarification letter was issued to the institution on 13.12.2010. The institution submitted its reply on 03.01.2011.

The Committee in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January 2011 considered the reply to Show Cause Notice, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve final Showcause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 03.03.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 23.03.2011.

The committee in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 has decided to issue Final Show Cause notice to the institution for the following reason under section 17 of the NCTE Act. Accordingly final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 23.05.2011 for the following:

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, and decided that shifting of B.Ed (APS03664) course to new/permanent premises is permitted. 97. APS04978 D.T.Ed CKS Teacher Training Institute, Vellore District, Tamilnadu CKS Teacher Training C.K.S. Educational Trust, Vellore, Tamilnadu submitted an application for grant of Institute, recognition to C.K.S. Teacher Training Institute, No.75, Railway Station Road, Gudiyattam, Vellore Vellore District-632602, Tamilnadu for D.T.Ed course on 02.01.2006. TN The application was processed as per the provisions contained in Rules and Regulation, Norms and Standards prevalent at that point of time and the recognition was granted to the institution vide its order dated 23.10.2006 with certain stipulated conditions.

The State Government of Tamilnadu vide its letter No.6987/U1-80-1 dated 20.03.2008 has informed certain irregularities by self-financing Teacher Training Institutions and recommended withdrawal of recognition for such institutions. The SRC considered the letter in its 157th meeting held on 23-24th April 2008 and decided to issue notice under section of NCTE Act. Accordingly notice under section 17 was issued to the institution on 17.06.2008. The institution submitted its reply on 16.07.2008.

SRC considered the reply in its 165th meeting held on 18th-19th October 2008 and decided to cause inspection of the institution under section 17 of NCTE Act, to verify the veracity of the compliance as claimed by the institution and also the structural modifications/improvement/shifting to new building as claimed, on payment of re-inspection 113 1

fee of Rs.40000//- by the institution. Accordingly a letter was issued to the institution to submit Rs.40000/- on 27.10.2008. The institution submitted its reply on 11.11.2008 alongwith Rs.40000/-

Meanwhile as per decision of SRC in its 175th meeting held on 13th-14th May 2009, the office of SRC has reviewed the files of the institution who have been granted recognition either in a rented premises pending construction of own building or in lease premises. A list of such institutions has been prepared and placed before SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20th-21st August 2009 wherein, it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for further action.

A notice was issued to the institution on 23.07.2010 to submit following documents. The institution submitted its reply on 23.08.2010 alongwith photocopies of certain documents. The committee considered the matter in its 196th meeting held on 15th-16th September 2010 and decided to cause inspection for shifting of premises.

Inspection of the institution for shifting for premises was conducted on 16.11.2010. The Committee in its 199th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December 2010 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Showcause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 04.02.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 24.02.2011. The committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 considered the reply and has decided to issue Final Show Cause notice to the institution for the following reason under section 17 of the NCTE Act, after careful consideration of the reply of the institution dt. 24.02.2011 for the show cause notice issued to the institution on 04.02.2011. Accordingly final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 18.04.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 23.05.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, and decided that shifting of D.T.Ed (APS04978) course to new/permanent premises is permitted. 98. APS02828 Sub:- AVM Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, Nalgonda District, D.Ed Andhra Pradesh. Course – D.Ed AVM Institute of An application was submitted by A.V.M Educational Society, Nalgonda District, Elementary Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Teacher vide dated 30.01.2004 Education, The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations Nalgonda of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to AP further recognise/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s).

The SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13 January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.

A letter dated 07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting 114 1

not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the State of Andhra Pradesh as the above colleges are exceeding in numbers than required.

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.4387/2011

Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 28.02.2011 vide W.P.No.4387 of 2011 reads as hereunder:

“While following the judgment of this court in writ petition No.6712 of 2009 dated 16.12.2009, this writ petition is allowed and the order dated 29.04.2009 issued vide proceedings No.F.SRO/NCTE/2008-09/12127 is set aside with a direction to the respondents to reconsider the matter afresh by applying the policy, which was in force at the time when the petitioners have applied for grant of permission to run D.Ed course.

It is, however, made clear that if any deficiencies are pointed out by the respondents, the petitioners have to comply with the same as per the earlier policy of the Government and the existing regulations framed under the National Council for Teachers Education Act”.

The Committee considered the matter and decided to process the application on submission of original application, and related supporting documents including Rs. 40000 towards inspection fee, within 60 days from the date of issue of letter.

As per direction of SRC, a letter issued to the applicant institution on 23/05/2011. The institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 27/05/2011.

The Committee considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt.03.06.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:

 The institution was not in possession of the land at the time of making of application. As per sale deed the land is registered on 11/05/2011, in favour of AVM institute of Elementar Teacher Education, which is against NCTE norms.

 Fresh FDRs for Rs. 5 & 3 lacs from a Nationalised Bank in joint account is to be submitted.

 Affidavit on Rs.100/- stamp paper duly notarized in the prescribed format to be submitted.

 In the building plan plot no. / Khasara no. is not mentioned.

 Change of Land Use Certificate from competent Government authority is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the courses of the institution as to why the the application cannot be rejected and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

99. APS00320 Lady Willingdon Institute of Advanced Study in Education, Kamarajar Salai, APS06214 Triplicane, Chennai-600005, Tamilnadu APS03246 B.Ed Lady Willingdon Institute of Advanced Study in Education, Kamarajar Salai, B.Ed-AI Triplicane, Chennai-600005, Tamilnadu submitted an applications for seeking grant M.Ed of recognition for B.Ed, B.Ed-AI & M.Ed. The institution was granted recognition for Lady offering B.Ed course with an intake of 200 students vide order dated 04.10.2002 Willingdon and B.Ed-AI with an intake of 5 for Physically challenged students on 13.02.2006 Institute of and M.Ed course with an intake of 25 on 31.12.2004 and later as per notification Advanced dated 26.7.2010 enhancement of 10 seats from existing 25 to 35 is permitted to the Study in institution on 02.09.2010. Education, Chennai In the mean time NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 27.12.2010 has forwarded a copy TN of the inspection report dated 18.09.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. The Committee in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January 2011 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. 116 1

Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 03.03.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 21.03.2011. SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 1st April 2011 considered the reply of the institution and decided to seek clarification from the institution.

Accordingly, clarification letter was issued to the institution on 05.05.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 18.05.2011. The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the institution dt. 18.05.2011 and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution. 10 APS03911 Grace Teacher Training Institute & Grace College of Education, Kanyakumari, 0. APS08509 Tamilnadu APS08887 D.T.Ed Grace Teacher Training Institute, Kanyakumari, Tamilnadu was granted recognition D.T.Ed-AI for offering D.T.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on 18.11.2005 with the B.Ed condition to shift to own premises within 3 years and D.T.Ed-AI with an intake of 50 Grace students on 11.01.2008 at Grace Nursing Home Complex, PPM Junction, Teacher Kaliakkavilai-629153, Kanyakumari District (Total 100 intake). Training Institute & Grace College of Education, Kanyakumari TamilNadu was granted recognition for College of offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students on 03/03/2008. Education, Kanyakumari SRC in its 181st meeting held on 20-21st August 2009 where in it was decided that TN the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for further action. The institution vide letter dated has submitted Rs.40000/- on 01.02.2010.

As per the decision of SRC a notice was issued to the institution on 23.07.2010 as per file no. APS03911. The institution has submitted its reply on 06.09.2010 stating that they have shifted to permanent building at Padanthalumoodu, Kanyakumari- 629194 from academic year 2007-08 vide letter dated 7.8.2007.

SRC considered the reply in its 196th meeting held on 15th-19th September 2010 and decided to cause inspection for shifting of premises. The inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was carried out on 22.11.2010. The Committee in its 199 th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December 2010 considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Showcause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly notice was issued to the institution on 04.02.2011 for D.T.Ed, D.T.Ed-AI and B.Ed course. The institution has submitted common written representation to show cause notice for D.T.Ed, D.T.Ed-AI, B.Ed on 07.03.2011.

Further, the institution has requested for continuation of B.Ed and shifting of D.T.Ed and D.T.Ed-Al.

The Committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 considered the Section 17 Inspection report of the institution, VT Report and all the relevant documentary evidences and also the reply of the institution dt.07.03.2011 and it was decided to await for the reply from DTERT and T.T. University for final decision.

Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 18.04.2011 to submit a letter stating no other courses except B.Ed & D.T.Ed are conducted in the building from affiliating bodies within 30 days.

The institution vide its letter dated 01.06.2011 submitted certificate dt.24.05.2011 from Tamilnadu Teachers Education University stating no other courses except B.Ed & D.T.Ed are conducted in the building.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the institution to the show cause notice and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, and decided that shifting of D.T.Ed (APS03911, D.T.Ed-Al (APS08509) & B.Ed (APS08887) course to new/permanent premises is permitted 10 APS02777 Pragathi D.Ed College, Annojiguda, NTPC Road, Ghatkesar (Mandal), Ranga 1. D.Ed Reddy, Andhra Pradesh Pragathi D.Ed An application was submitted by Pragathi D.Ed. College, Annojiguda, NTPCRoad, College, Ghatkesar(Mandal), Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh, for grant of recognition to Rangareddy D.Ed course in the office of SRC-NCTE, Bangalore vide dated 03.02.2004 under AP NCTE notification dated 05.01.2004 dispensed with the requirement of NOC of the state Government from the institutions running B.Ed college and invited applications for D.Ed course from different institutions for grant of recognition to Elementary Teacher Education courses under Sarva Shikshana Abhiyan (SSA).

Your application was under process and meanwhile, the government of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad filed a Writ Petition No 22866 of 2005 in the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh of Hyderabad challenging the notification of NCTE with regard to the dispensing with the requirement of NOC from the State Government. The Writ petition was allowed by the learned single judge with the directions that the rule excluding the state Government is bad. Against said judgement a Writ Appeal No.692 of 2006 was filed in the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Hyderabad. Many discussions took place between the state Government of Andhra Pradesh and SRC-NCTE. However, neither state Government withdrew the case filed by them nor the stay has been vacated.

Some institutions went to the court and filed writ petitions individually, seeking directions for processing of their applications, in one of such Writ Petition No.8278 of 2008. The Hon’ble High Court decided that the applications of the institutions shall be processed as per the NCTE rules and regulations norms and standards existing as on date.

As per the direction of Hon’ble High Court and decision of SRC for processing of 118 1

pending D.Ed application as per new regulation as per new regulation of NCTE in its 164th Meeting held on 20th September, 2008 meeting held on 20th September 2008, the SRC started to process the applications.

In view of the above decision, a deficiency letter was issued to the institution vide dated 03.11.2008.

The institution submitted its reply on 03.02.2009 and the file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognize/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s).

SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13th January, 2009 meeting held on 12-13th January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect.

A letter dated 07.02.2009 forwarded by Principal Secretary of Education requesting not to accord further recognition/permission to the new colleges/private B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit in the state of Andhra Pradesh as the above college are exceeding in numbers than required.

A letter dated 17th March, 2009 has been received FROM NCTE Hqrs informing that the “The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/Permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been considered in NCTE and it has been decided that no further recognition/permission to any institution in the state of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-10 for B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education Courses also”.

The state Government vide its letter dated 20.03.2009 informed that it has been decided not to recommend the name of your institution.

The letters dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009, 17.03.2009 and 20.03.2009 were considered by SRC in its 172nd meeting held on 25th –26th March 2009 and SRC decided to accept the recommendation of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh, not to grant recognition to any of the Teacher Training Institutions in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the year 2009-2010 and decided to close the applications.

Now, Therefore the application submitted by Pragathi D.Ed. College, Annojiguda, NTPCRoad, Ghatkesar(Mandal), Ranga Reddy, Andhra Pradesh here by Closed. Vide letter dated 03.12.2010 the institution requested to consider granting approval on the basis of SCERT & State Government remarks for the academic year 2011- 12. The institution was advised to prefer appeal against SRC order.

The institution ignored to approach Appellate Authority, NCTE Head Quarters and 119 1

directly approached Hon’ble High Court in writ petition no 2106/2011 wherein the Hon’ble High court passed an order as under

“In that view of the matter, having regard to the fact that the application of the first petitioner society is also prior to the present policy notified by the Government and the respondents considered such application applying the present policy of the Government, order bearing No.F.SRO/NCTE/2008-09/12128, dated 29.04.2009, rejecting the request of the first petitioner society to run D.Ed College, is set aside and the respondents are directed to reconsider the application of the first petitioner society with reference to the policy, which was in force, during relevant year, when the application was initially submitted by it, and take steps accordingly, for grant of permission as prayed for”.

The committee in its 202nd meeting considered the matter and decided to obtain all the relevant documents as per the norms including the valid building completion certificate, for consideration as per the Court orders. As per the decision of SRC, a letter was issued to the institution on 18.04.2011

The institution submitted its reply on 24.04.2011 stating that relevant documents already submitted on 11.03.2011.

The committee considered the reply of the institution dt. 24.04.2011, and decided to cause Composite inspection of the institution.

10 AOS00300 K.L.E.Society’s College of Education, Vidyanagar, Hubli-580021,Dharwad 2. B.Ed District, Karnataka KLE Society’s K.L.E.Society’s College of Education, Vidyanagar, Hubli-580021,Dharwad District, College of Education, Karnataka has submitted application on 16.10.2003. The institution was granted Dharwad recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated KA 18.07.2000.

Further, the institution had submitted application for starting K.L.E Society’s College of Education, No. 3236, Sakhare English Medium School Campus, Unkal Cross, Vidyanagar, Hubli-580 031, Dharwad District, Karnataka (SRCAPP78) has submitted application for starting M.Ed course on 29.10.2009. Deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 22.12.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 22.02.2010. The reply for deficiency letter was placed before SRC in its 190th meeting held on 29-30 March 2010 and SRC decided to cause inspection. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 05.05.2010.

SRC in its 192nd meeting held on 10-11 May 2010 considered the matter decided to refuse recognition to the M.Ed course. Further, the Committee also decided to serve Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE, Act, for B.Ed course for violation of NCTE regulations, (i.e. B.Ed being offered in the same building along with Pharmacy and 120 1

Nursing programmes). Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 07.06.2010. The institution has submitted its representation on 25.06.2010. The SRC in its 194th meeting held on 21-22 July 2010 considered the representation and decided to withdraw recognition. Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution vide order dated F.SRS/NCTE/2010-2011/20778. Dt 27.08.2010.

The institution has filed appeal Under Section 18 of NCTE Act, before the Appellate Authority, NCTE, New Delhi against the withdrawal order of SRC vide order dated. 19.11.2010. Appeal reversed for getting re-inspection of the institution to verify whether the nursing/pharmacy colleges have been shifted and the institution is now functioning as per the prescribed NCTE norms and if so to restore recognition of the institution.

The SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22-23 December 2010 considered the Appellate authority order and decided to cause re-inspection. The inspection was carried out on 23.03.2011. The inspection report has been received along with VCD.

The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 21st March & 1st April, 2011 considered the VT report along with VCD and decided to call for clarification. Accordingly, a clarification letter was issued to the institution on 04.05.2011. The institution has submitted its reply on 07.06.2011.

The Committee considered the VT report of the institution, reply of the institution dt. 07.06.2011 and other related documents along with the original file of the institution and decided to continue recognition accorded to the institution.

10 APS08977 Chandra Chellappan College of Education, Namakkal District 3. B.Ed Tamilnadu Chandra Chellappan Chandra Chellappan College of Education, Namakkal District, Tamilnadu College of has submitted an application for seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course Education, on 23.8.2007. Namakkal TN The application was processed and recognition to the institution for B.Ed course was granted on 7.12.2007 with an intake of 100 students at No.796, Salem Main Road, Namakkal-637001, Tamilnadu.

Meanwhile a complaint was received from Shri. N. Ramasamy, Chairman, Tamilnadu Education, Development Organization, No. 21-Thandu Marriamman Street, Annanagar West, Chennai – 40, Tamilnadu on 17.5.2010.

The Committee in its 193rd meeting held on 21st-22nd June 2010 considered the complaint and decided to call for remarks from the institution and to obtain an affidavit from the complainant and to the institution and to submit the reply within 15 days on the following was issued on 30.07.2010. 121 1

The institution has submitted reply on 16.08.2010. The Committee in its 195 th meeting held on 17th-18th August 2010 and decided that the institution be directed to submit report from the affiliating University that there is no other course being run by the institution.

The committee in its 196th meeting held on 15th-16th September 2010 considered the matter and decided that no further action is required, as complainant is fictitious. The institution vide its letter dated 13.10.2010 along with D.D. of Rs.40000/- & 18.05.2011 submitted proposal for shifting of premises at Karungalpalayam (NH-7), Bus Stop, Periagoundampatty Road, Thalambadi Post, Namakkal Taluk, Tamilnadu-637019.

The matter was considered by the Committee and it was decided to cause Shifting inspection of the institution for B.Ed (APS08977) Course, under Section 17 of NCTE Act, to verify the at the new premises and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities. 10 APS07190 Smt & Sri Gurrala Krishna Rao Vasanthamma Degree & P.G.College,Mallina 4. B.Ed Nagar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari-533103 Andhra Pradesh Smt & Sri gurrala Smt & Sri Gurrala Krishna Rao Vasanthamma Degree & P.G.College, Mallina Krishna Rao Nagar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari-533103 Andhra Pradesh has been granted Vasanthamm recognition by SRC for offering B.Ed Course of one year duration with annual intake a Degree & of 100 students on 04.10.2007. PG College, East A letter dated 20.11.2010 has been received and has requested for change of Godavari name for B.Ed Course as “Sharada College of Education”Pidimgoyya, AP Rajahmundry. From the perusal of the request it is found that institute also wants to shift to new premises, though the institution has not mentioned it clearly in their request letter.

SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22nd –23rd December, 2010 considered the request and decided not to permit Smt & Sri Gurrala Krishna Rao Vasanthamma Degree & P.G College Mallina Nagar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh for change in the name and also location (from one permanent premise originally permitted to another place).

This was communicated to the institution vide letter dated 04.02.2011.

Now the institution in its letter dated 10.03.2011 has requested for change of the name of the college as Sharada College of Education. In addition to that the institution has also submitted latest Resolution of the Society taken in respect of naming of the B.Ed College on 28.02.2011.

Institution is also stated that they want change of name and nothing beyond that. The college will be in the same premises and there is no proposal for changing of location.

SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March-1st April. 2011 considered the request of the management for change of name of their institution and the institution be ordered to pay Rs. 40000/- for consideration of name change.

With reference to the 203rd meeting of SRC held on 31st March-1st April, 2011 from website institution in its letter dated 12.04.2011 submitted the D.D of Rs 40000/- vide D.D No.891908 dated 11.04.2011

The committee considered the matter and decided that change of name of the institution offering B.Ed (APS07190) course, as “Sharada College of Education” Pidimgoyya, Rajahmundry, Andhrapradesh, is permitted subject to no change in the location of the institution/Structure/premises/Nature of composition of management and other usual conditions. 10 APS01856 Sarvodaya Institute of Teacher Education, No.12, 10th Main, Binny Layout, 5. D.Ed Nagarabhavi Main Road, Vijayanagar, Bangalore-560040, Karnataka Sarvodaya Institute of Teacher Sarvodaya Institute of Teacher Education, No.12, 10th Main, Binny Layout, Education, Nagarabhavi Main Road, Vijayanagar, Bangalore-560040, Karnataka submitted an Bangalore application for D.Ed course on 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition KA for offering D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students vide order dated 26.04.2007.

The institution has submitted a letter on 26.05.2011 and has stated though they have got an order to run the college, college did not function due to lack of admission. They are unable to run the college and management has decided to withdraw the recognition Hence, the institution has requested to withdraw the recognition and return the Fixed Deposit Receipts.

The Committee considered the Institution’s request for closure of D.Ed course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for (APS01856) D.Ed course with effect from 2012-2013, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their final year course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.

The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.

Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore.

10 APS01088 Valummel Teacher Training Institute, Sulthan Bathery, Moolankave Post, Wayanad 6. TTI District- 673592, Kerala has made an application for TTI course to Southern Valummel Regional Committee, NCTE, Bangalore on 31.12.2002. 123 1

Teacher Training The application was processed and after considering the report of the Visiting Team Institute, as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the in stitution for offering Wayanad TTI course with an intake of 50 students from the session 2004-2005 vide order KL No.4442 dated 02.07.2004.

The institution in its letter dated 18.09.2007 has submitted proposal for shifting the TTC course to the new location along with inspection fees of Rs.40,000/-. Accordingly, inspection was carried out on 27.01.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice for shifting of premises Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following :

 Land Usage Certificate from the competent authority not submitted.  Fixed Deposit Receipts of Rs.5.00 lakhs towards Endowment Fund and Rs.3.00 lakhs towards Reserve Fund are from private Bank. The FDRs are to be deposited in the Nationalized Bank for a duration of 5 years in joint account.  Encumbrance Certificate from Government authorized authority not submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal of recognition, based on the records available, with no further notice.

As per the decision of SRC show cause notice was issued to the institution on 18.04.2011.

In reply to the notice institution submitted a request letter for extending the date to submit the records.

The committee considered the request for extension of time of the management vide letter dt. 4.5.2011, for submission of records and decided to grant time up to July 15th 2011.

10 AOS00407 Rural Teacher Training Institute, D.S.Road, Devanahalli-562110, 7. D.Ed Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka Rural Teacher Rural Teacher Training Institute, D.S.Road, Devanahalli – 562110, Bangalore Rural Training District, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering D.Ed course with an intake Institute, of 90 students vide order dated 01.10.1996. Bangalore KA NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 22.06.2010 has forwarded a copy of the inspection

report dated 19.04.2010 conducted under section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 194th held on 21-22 July 2010 considered the letter from NCTE- Hqrs, VT report and original file of the institution and decided to serve Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution has submitted written representation on 03.09.2010.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the written representation submitted by the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for D.Ed course for the following reasons:

1. The institution is running Pharmacy programme in same building along with D.Ed programme which is a serious violation of norms.

Hence, it is decided to withdraw the recognition given to the institution with effect from the year 2012-2013, to enable the current batch of students to complete their second year of the programme. But the institution is debarred from making any further fresh admission from this date of issue of this orders. The affiliating / examining body be informed accordingly.

Accordingly, order withdrawing recognition was issued to the institution on 06.12.2010.

The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide order dated 26.05.2011 has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC with direction to get another comprehensive inspection done on payment of requisite fee by the institution immediately, to verify as to whether the institution is functioning in conformity with the provisions of the NCTE Act/Regulations and for further decision thereafter. The original file is yet to be received from NCTE-Hqrs.

Further, the institution in its letter dated 06.06.2011 has submitted Demand Draft bearing No.434781 dated 06.06.2011 for Rs.40,000/- towards inspection fee. The institution has requested to conduct inspection as per Appellate Authority order.

The main file is yet to be received from NCTE, Hqr and they are being requested to send the same expeditiously.

The committee considered the Appellate authority order dt. 26.05.2011 and decided to cause Composite inspections for all the courses run by of the institution Under Section 17 of NCTE Act as soon as the original file of the said institution is received from NCTE Head Qaurters.

10 APS02172 Bangalore City College of Diploma in Education, No.160, Chelekere Main 8. APS06150 Road, Kalayanagar Post, Bangalore-560043, Karnataka 125 1

D.Ed D.Ed-AI Bangalore City College of Diploma in Education, No.160, Chelekere Main Road, Bangalore Kalyanagar Post, Bangalore – 560 043, Karnataka has submitted application for City College D.Ed-AI course on 02.01.2006. The institution was granted recognition for offering of Diploma in D.Ed-AI course on 01.08.2007 with an intake of 100 students which includes Education, existing intake of 50 students and additional intake of 50 students. Bangalore NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 22.06.2010 has forwarded a copy of the inspection KA report dated 20.04.2010 conducted under section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 194th meeting held on 21-22 July 2010 considered the report and decided to issue Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, Notice was issued to the institution 31.08.2010. The institution has submitted written representation on 02.09.2010.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October 2010 considered the written representation submitted by the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for D.Ed, D.Ed-Adl, B.Ed., M..Ed courses, as the institution is running all the above mentioned courses along with Pre-University college with grossly inadequate buillt up area and decided to withdraw the recognition given to the institution.

The recognition is withdrawn with immediate effect from academic year 2011-2012 for the following courses: (APS02368)B.Ed and (APS07204) M.Ed programmes.The committee decides to withdraw the recognition for D.Ed Course (APS02172), D.Ed – AI (APS06150) with effect from 2012-13, as a special case in order to enable the on going batch of students in D.Ed course, if any, to complete their final year course. Accordingly, order withdrawing recognition was issued to the institution on 06.12.2010.

The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the appellate authority vide order dated 26.05.2011 has reversed the withdrawal order of SRC with a direction to cause composite inspection for all the courses and to take an appropriate action thereafter. The original file of the institution is yet to be received.

The committee considered the Appellate authority order dt. 26.05.2011 and decided to cause Composite inspection for all the courses run by the institution Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. as soon as the original file of the said institution is received from NCTE Head Qaurters.

10 APS03719 B.T.L College of Education, No.259/B, Bommasandra Industial Area, hosur 9. B.Ed Main Road, Bangalore-560099, Karnataka BTL College of Education, B.T.L. College of Education, No.259/B, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Hosur Main Bangalore Road, Bangalore-560099, Karnataka submitted an application for grant of KA recognition on 20.12.2004. The institution was granted recognition for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 30.01.2006.

In the mean time NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 22.09.2010 has forwarded a copy of the inspection report dated 22.04.2010 conducted Under Section 13 of NCTE Act. As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE, Hqrs has requested SRC to initiate action against the institution Under Section 17 of the NCTE Act immediately.

The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13-14 October, 2010 considered the matter and decided to issue Showcause Notice. Accordingly, showcause notice was issued on 06.12.2010. The institution has submitted written representation on 19.01.2011.

The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20-21 January 2011 Considered written representation of the institution for the deficiencies pointed out in its show cause notice dt. 06.12.2010, the management admitted iun writing that they are running pre-university course(PUC) in the same building where B.Ed, programmes is also conducted.

1. The Built up area allotted to B.Ed in one floor is only 1190 Sq.mts, which has been admitted in writing by the management. The built up area is inadequate for B.Ed course as per NCTE norms.

Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of the B.Ed course run by B.T.L College of Education, No.259/B, Bommasandra Insdustrial Area, Hosur Main Road, Bangalore, Karnataka from the academic year 2011-12 in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.

But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The affiliating body/Examining board/ body be informed accordingly.

Accordingly, order withdrawing recognition was issued to the institution on 11.03.2011.

The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide order dated 26.05.2011 has confirmed the withdrawal order of SRC. The original file is yet to be received from NCTE-hqrs.

The committee noted the confirmation of withdrawal order by Appellate Authority vide order dt. 26.05.2011.

11 --- Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Cuddalore District Tamilnadu 0. D.P.Ed submitted application vide dated 13.01.2011 received in this office on 20.01.2011 Annamalai for seeking grant of recognition for D.P.Ed application for the session 2011-2012. University, Cuddalore On preliminary scrutiny of the application following deficiencies are observed;- TN 1. Last date for submission of on-line application is 1st October 2010. Hence hard

copy of application should have been submitted on or before 8.10.2010. The University has submitted its application on 20.1.2011, which is after the last date.

2. As per the new Regulation, 2009 the application may be essentially submitted electronically through on-line mode available on the website of National Council for Teacher Education along with the processing fee. However, while submitting the application through on-line mode, the application and requisite documents in triplicate shall have to be submitted or sent by registered post separately to the office of the Regional Committee concerned, immediately after on-line submission of the application. The university has not submitted the application in on-line mode.

3. Further, as per Public Notice dated 29th July, 2010, application will not be accepted for D.P.Ed course for the academic session 2011-2012.

In view of above, the application was rejected and returned along with D.D. of Rs. 40,100/- bearing no. 324456 dated 13.1.2011 vide letter no.F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011/26522 dated 27.01.2011.

The committee noted the confirmation of rejection of the application of the institution for D.P.Ed course, by Appellate Authority order vide order dt. 26.05.2011. 11 --- Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Cuddalore District Tamilnadu 1. B.P.Ed submitted application vide dated 13.01.2011 received in this office on 20.01.2011 Annamalai for seeking grant of recognition for B.P.Ed application for the session 2011-2012. University, Cuddalore On preliminary scrutiny of the application following deficiencies are observed;- TN 1. Last date for submission of on-line application is 1st October 2010. Hence hard copy of application should have been submitted on or before 8.10.2010. The University has submitted its application on 20.1.2011, which is after the last date.

2. As per the new Regulation, 2009 the application may be essentially submitted electronically through on-line mode available on the website of National Council for Teacher Education along with the processing fee. However, while submitting the application through on-line mode, the application and requisite documents in triplicate shall have to be submitted or sent by registered post separately to the office of the Regional Committee concerned, immediately after on-line submission of the application. The university has not submitted the application through on-line mode.

3. Further, as per Public Notice dated 29th July, 2010, the application will not be accepted for B.P.Ed course for the academic session 2011-2012.

The committee noted the confirmation of rejection of the application of the 128 1

institution for B.P.Ed course, by Appellate Authority order vide order dt. 26.05.2011. 11 --- Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Cuddalore District Tamilnadu 2. M.P.Ed submitted application vide dated 13.01.2011 received in this office on 20.01.2011 Annamalai for seeking grant of recognition for M.P.Ed course for the session 2011-2012. University, Cuddalore On preliminary scrutiny of the application the following deficiencies are observed;- TN 1. Last date for submission of on-line application is 1st October 2010. Hence hard copy of application should have been submitted on or before 8.10.2010. The University has submitted its application on 20.1.2011, which is after the last date.

2. As per the new Regulation, 2009 the application may be essentially submitted electronically through on-line mode available on the website of National Council for Teacher Education along with the processing fee. However, while submitting the application through on-line mode, the application and requisite documents in triplicate shall have to be submitted or sent by registered post separately to the office of the Regional Committee concerned, immediately after on-line submission of the application. The university has not submitted the application through on-line mode.

The committee noted the confirmation of rejection of the application of the institution for M.P.Ed course, by Appellate Authority order vide order dt. 26.05.2011. 11 --- The Sri Ayyappa Educational Trust has submitted an application in the name 3. B.Ed and style of Sri Ayyappa College of Education, Gudiyattam, Vellore on Sri Ayyappa 18.10.2010 seeking grant of recognition for B.Ed course for the session 2011-2012. Educational Trust, As per the new Regulation, 2009 “the application may be essentially submitted Gudiyattam electronically through on-line mode available on the website of National Council for TN Teacher Education along with the processing fee. However, while submitting the application through on-line mode, the application and requisite documents in triplicate shall have to be submitted or sent by registered post separately to the office of the Regional Committee concerned, immediately after on-line submission of the application. The institution has not submitted the application in on-line mode”. Since, the application is not submitted through on-line mode, the institution’s application was rejected and returned along with original D.D. of 41,000 on 2.11.2010. Again, the institution has re-submitted the application for B.Ed course on 9.11.2010, which is last date for submission of application. Mainly, the institution has submitted the application through on-line mode as per the new Regulation, 2009. Hence, the application has been returned back on 15.11.2010 along with original D.D. of Rs. 41,000/-. 129 1

Reasons: The last date for submission of on-line application is 1st October 2010. Hence hard copy of application should have been submitted on or before 8.10.2010. The institution has submitted its application on 18.10.2010, which is after the last date. Further, as per Public Notice dated 29th July, 2010, application will not be accepted for B.Ed course for the academic session 2011-2012.

The committee noted the confirmation of rejection of the application of the institution for B.Ed course, by Appellate Authority order vide order dt. 26.05.2011 and the decision of SRC is confirmed. 11 APS05428 SRC-NCTE granted recognition on 14.05.2007 for T.P.T course with an intake 4. TPT of 50 students in respect of Mother Teresa Telugu Pandit Training College, Mother D.No.4/671, Gandhi Road, Prodeatur, Kadapa District-516360, Andhra Teresa TPT Pradesh. College. Cuddapah A letter along with Visiting Team report (under Section 13 of NCTE Act,) has been received from NCTE Hqrs vide letter No. F.No.14-11/2008/NCTE/Insp/A2394 dated 16.09.2009.

The above said inspection was conducted on 23.03.2009 in r/o. Mother Teresa Pandit Training College, Peddasetti Pally, Kadapa, AP by NCTE Hqrs under section 13 of NCTE Act. NCTE Hqrs has forwarded a copy of inspection report to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the NCTE Act.

Gist of VTR assessment: - 1. The building is under construction. Ground floor roofing and first floor roofing is over. 2. The material and equipment related to all the laboratories and library are dumped in another building which is nearly 5 kms away from the premises, so the team can not verify physically the resources mentioned in the records. As per the information provided all the equipment is for both B.Ed and TPT under the same management. 3. The staff appointed is as per NCTE Norms.

SRC considered the matter and decided to cause inspection under Section 17 of NCTE Act, on submission of all related documents including filled in Questionnaire within four weeks since the date of confirmation of the Minutes.

Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 01.12.2009 seeking required documents along with the filled questionnaire.

The institution has not submitted its reply even after expiry of seven months after the notice period. The institution is trying to avoid the Section 17 visit by not responding to the Notice.

The Committee considered the matter and observed that the institution has not 130 1

replied to the Notice dated 1.12.2009. Hence, based on the gist of VT report, inspected under Section 13 of NCTE Act by NCTE-HQ and also based on the available records, the Committee decided to withdraw recognition of Telugu Pandit Training(TPT) course for the following :-  The building is under construction. Ground floor roofing and first floor roofing is over.  The material and equipment related to all the laboratories and library are dumped in another building which is nearly 5 kms away from the premises, so the team can not verify physically the resources mentioned in the records. As per the information provided all the equipment is for both B.Ed and TPT under the same management.

The institution went for appeal and the appellate authority refused tp accept the reasons for condonation of delay and admit the appeal.

The committee noted the Appellate Authority order vide order dt. 26.04.2011 of refusal to accept the reasons for condonation of delay and hence not to admit the appeal of the institution. 11 SRCAPP298 Sub:- Dr. Samson College of Education, Village- Tarlupadu, Post- 5. B.Ed Tarlupadu, Taluka- Tariupadu, Distt- Prakasham,Andhra Pradesh DR. Samson for B.Ed Course College of Education, Christian Educational Academy, Village- Tarlupadu, Post- Prakasam Tariupadu, Distt- Prakasham, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of AP recognition to Dr. Samson College of Education, Village- Tarlupadu, Post- Tarlupadu, Taluka- Tariupadu, Distt- Prakasham,Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 22.11.10.

2. In first instance as per scrutiny the applicant has submitted application for seeking recognition for teacher education course without any date mentioned on their covering letters which has been received in the office of SRC after 08.10.10. In this regard a letter was issued on 25.10.10 to The Member Secretary, NCTE HQ with request to suggest direction under clause 7 (1-A) of the Regulation 2009 wherein it is stipulated as follows.

“ the application submitted online but not followed by dispatch through registered post or by hand with the documents mentioned at (I) to (VII) above within 7 days shall be considered as incomplete and shall be summarily rejected with reasons recorded in writing and returned to the applicant along with the processing fees within 30 days of the receipt of the application”

3. In response to this office letter dated the NCTE Hq has directed vide letter no. F.No.49-1/2010/NCTE/N&S/A28083 dated 24.11.2010 directed that the hard copies of these documents have to be dispatched within 7 days of the last date of receiving applications which 01.10.2010 this year. In this regard a

clarification letter was issued to applicant institution on 07.01.11 with request to submit proof of dispatch. 4. The Reply of the institution dated 19.01.2011 is placed in SRC considered the matter in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21th January, 2011 and on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on the table, written representation from the institution, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application. The application is received as rejected on the following grounds:-

 The Application of institution is received in SRC on 22.11.10 which is 48 days late.

5. Therefore the application of Dr. Samson College of Education, Village- Tarlupadu, Post- Tarlupadu, Taluka- Tariupadu, Distt- Prakasham,Andhra Pradesh for permission to B.Ed Course is hereby rejected and returned and rejection order was issued on 28.01.2011.

The institution has approached to appellate authority wherein appellate authority has passed an order dated 26.04.2011 as under:-

“ After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal affidavit, the committee reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dated 28-01.2011 with a direction to the SRC for further processing of the case on merit as per Regulations. Accordingly the appeal was accepted and the order of the SRC dated 28-01.2011 reversed.”

The above facts alongwith original file are placed before SRC for consideration.

The committee decided to process the application further as per the direction of Appellate order dt. 26.04.2011.

11 SRCAPP424 CVS Krishna Murthy Theja Charities, Chittor, Andhra Prades. Dt. 04/02/2011 is 6. M.Ed against the order No. F.SRS/NCTE/New/AP/26528 dt. 28/01/2011 of the Southern CVS Krsihna Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting M.Ed course on the Theja ground “The institution has not replied in respect of proof of dispatch within College of stipulated time and hence it is decided that no further action is necessary and that Education, the applications are to be rejcted in terms of clause 7(1-A) Regulation 2009”. Chittoor, AP CVS Krishna Murthy Theja Charities, (hereinafter referred to as the Appellant), preferred an appeal dt. 09/02/2011 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said order.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after considering orgal arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejcted. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dt. 28.01.2011 was confirmed.

The committee noted the Appellate Authority order vide order dt. 26.04.2011 of rejection of appeal of the institution.

11 SRCAPP126 Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, dt. 07/06/2011 is 7. B.P.Ed-Al against the Order No. F.SRO/NCTE/B.P.Ed-A-1/2010/19169 dt. 31.05.2010 of the Acharya Southern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed course Nagarjuna on the grounds “1) The institution is already having M.P.Ed course and B.P.Ed University, course. Hence, as per the NCTE norms, 2700 sq.mts of built up space is required Guntur. AP for offering B.P.Ed and M.P.Ed courses. An additional of 500 sq.mts is required for increase of intake from 50 to 100. 2) Additional built up area earmarked for additional course is 3529 sq.ft. which is less than NCTE norms.

Acharya Nagarjuna University (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dt. 23/06/2010 to the National Council for teacher education., New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act. 1993 against the said order.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and reverse the SRC’s order dt. 31.05.2010 with a direction to the SRC for further processing of the case as per NCTE Regulations. 2009. Accordingly, the appeal was accepted and the order of SRC reversed.

The committee decided to process the application further as per the direction of Appellate order dt. 26.05.2011.

11 SRCAPP411 Gajwel College of Education, Medak Andhra Pradesh dt.05/04/2011 is against 8. D.Ed Gajwel the Order No. SRC/NCTE/B.Ed/2010/27797 dt. 23/03/2011 of the Southern College of Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.El.Ed course on the Education, ground “The institution has not replied to the deficiency letters even after a lapse of Medak. AP stipulated time of 60 days as per clause 7(10, Regulation 2009)”.

Gajwel College of Education (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dt. 06/04/2011 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said order.

After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after hearing oral arguments advanced during hearing, the concil reached the conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should be rejcted. 133 1

Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and SRC’s order dt. 23.03.2011 was confirmed.

The committee noted the Appellate Authority order vide order dt. 26.05.2011, confirmation of rejection of appeal of the institution.

11 APS05980 J.S.J.V Teacher Training Institute, Cuddalore, Tamilnadu 9. APS08538 D.T.Ed J.S.J.V Teacher Training Institute, Cuddalore, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for D.T.Ed-AI grant of recognition to D.T.Ed course. Recognition to the institution was granted to the institution on 23.12.2006 for D.T.Ed course & D.T.Ed-AI on 06.11.2007 with annual intake of JSJV 100 students. Teacher Training As per decision of SRC in its 175th meeting of SRC held on 13-14th May 2009, the office of Institute, SRC has reviewed the files of the institution who have been granted recognition either in a Cuddalore rented premises pending construction of own building or in lease premises. A list of such st th st TN institutions has been prepared and placed before SRC in its 181 meeting held on 20 -21 August 2009 wherein, it was decided that the institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the expiry of three years time limit be issued notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for further action. Accordingly a notice was issued to the institution on 16.09.2009.

The institution has not submitted reply to the above notice so far. Instead the institution has submitted letter dated 12.04.2010 requesting for change of name from J.S.J.V. Teacher Training Institute to C.K. Teacher Training Institute. The matter was considered by SRC in its 191st meeting held on 20th-21st April 2010 and it was decided that change of name from JSJV Teacher Training Institute to C.K. Teacher Training Institute cannot be considered as the institution is still running in temporary accommodation and any change of name and character of the institution is not permitted at this stage. This was communicated to the college vide letter dt.18.05.2010. The Committee considered the brief note about the College and also the complaints received against the institution and has decided to issue Final Notice to the institution As per the decision of SRC, final show notice was issued to the institution on 18.05.2010. The institution has submitted its reply on 01.06.2010. The Committee in its 193rd meeting held on 21st-22nd June 2010 considered the reply to the Notice and decided to withdraw recognition. Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued vide order No. F.SRO/NCTE/2010/20030, Dt. 27.07.2010. Recognition to D.T.Ed-Al was also withdrawn vide order No. F.SRO/NCTE2010/21089. Dt. 14.09.2010. Aggrieved by the withdrawal order, the institution preferred appeal under Section 18. The Appellate Authority vide order dated 18.11.2010 & 23.12.2010 reversed the SRC order dated 27.07.2010 & 14.09.2010 with direction to SRC to examine the reply furnished by the institution and take appropriate decision thereafter. The committee in its 199th meeting held on 22nd-23rd December 2010 noted the Appellate authority order and decided to issue a show cause notice. Notice was issued to the institution on 11.02.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 01.03.2011. The Committee in its 202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 considered the Reply of the institution Dt. 01.03.2011 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it

was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.04.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 24.03.2011 which was prior to issue of notice dt.11.04.2011 after seeing the decision of SRC in SRC Website. The Committee in its 204th meeting held on 27th-28th April 2011 considered the VT report of the institution, VCD, reply of the institution dt. 27.04.2011 and other related documents along with the original file of the institution, and decided that shifting to new/permanent premises is permitted. It is observed while examining the Appellate Authority order that withdrawal of recognition by SRC on the ground of not shifting was not in order according to Appeal Committee. When this was not in order the decision of SRC to permit shifting new premises is to be re-considered. In this circumstances it would be ideal to consider continuation of recognition instead of shifting. Hence order for continuation of recognition being proposed to be issued.

The committee decided to reconfirm the earlier decision taken in its 204th meeting held on 27-28 April 2011 permitting shifting to new/permanent premises. (The recognition had already been restored by Appeal Committee reversal of the SRC’s withdrawal order). 12 APS00196 Brief in respect of Mother Teresa College of Edcuation, Khammam District, Andhra 0. B.Ed Pradesh. Mother Theresa Mother Teresa College of Edcuation, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh. has made an College of application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore Education, Khammam The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team AP: as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 08.04.2003.

The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises). The institution in its letter dated 31.08.2007 has submitted proposal for shifting the B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-530858 dated 18.09.2007. The inspection was done on 07.02.2011

 As per sale deed land is situated to be in Rejerla Village, whereas the inspection is carried out at Kothuru Village, Khammam District. 135 1

 As per Land usage certificate, no sale deed is executed for Sy.no.-156/3.

 Science lab & Education Technology facilities are to be strengthened. In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice. 12 APS00045 Bharath College of Education, 20/348, D.C Road, Kadapa-516001, Andhra Pradesh. 1. B.Ed has made an application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore on 01.01.2001 Bharath College of The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting Team Education as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution for offering Kadapa B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 04.04.2003. AP The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution shall shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition. (In case the course started in rented premises)

The institution in its letter dated 13.09.2007 has submitted proposal for shifting the B.Ed course to the new location. With D.D of Rs 40,000/- vide no-729004 dated 08.09.2007. The management is also running D.Ed course. The inspection was done on 20.04.2011

 As per sale deed land is situated to be in Rejerla Village, whereas the inspection is carried out at Kothuru Village, Khammam District.

 Land usage certificate from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted.

 FDR’s for 5lacs & 3 lakhs in joint names for a period of five years from a 136 1

nationalized Bank to be submitted.

 Psychology lab & Other labs/Physical Education facilities are to be strengthened.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to all the courses of the institution as to why the recognition be not withdrawn and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

12 SRCAPP467 YVSR Memorial College of Education, Kadapa AP submitted an application to 2. B.Ed SRC-NCTE for grant of recognition for B.Ed course on online 01.10.2011 YVSR Memorial The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State College Government for recommendation on 16.12.2010/04.02.2011 A deficiency letter was Kadapa. AP issued to the institution on 18.01.2011 for the following Points

 Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Endowment funds- the institution has not submitted FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds. Hence the institution is required to submit original fresh FDR issued for proposed course as per regulation.  Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has not submitted FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved funds. Hence the institution is required to submit original fresh FDR issued for proposed course as per regulation.  Approved building plan by the competent civil authority :- Institution has not submitted building plan. Hence the institution is required to submit approved building plan approved by civil competent authority. wherein it should be clearly mentioning i.e Khasra no, plot no, proposed course, total area, built up area duly approved by competent authority with resolution in all respect in English. If the institution has running other teacher education courses/ other technical courses in the same premises then, the institution shall submit earmarked area for proposed course with total area and built up area.  Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority :- The institution has submitted photocopy of registered land documents in Telugu Version and it is not certified by the competent authority. Hence, the institution is required to submit certified copy of the registered Land Documents issued by the Office of the Sub- Registrar or competent issuing authority in English version.  Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs 100/ stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or Notary public, stating the precise location of the land (village, district, state etc) the total area in possession, the permission of the competent authority to use the land for educational purpose and mode of possession i.e. ownership or lease :- the institution has not submitted affidavit 137 1

of Rs 100/- stamp paper duly attested by oath commissioner or Notary public . Hence the institution is required to submit original affidavit of Rs 100/- stamp paper in all respect.  Building completion certificate:- The institution has not submitted the building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed format. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority in prescribed (Copy enclosed).  Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has not submitted the copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands – conversion to Non – Agricultural purpose) issued by competent authority.  Minority Certificate:- the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in this regard. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority

The committee in its 203rd meeting held on on 31st March and 1st April 2011, considered the reply of institution dt. 18.03.2011 for the deficiencies and decided to cause inspection of the institution under Section 14 of NCTE Act to verify the infrastructural and instructional facilities.

The inspection was conducted on 18/04/2011.

The committee in 205th meeting held on 18-19 of May 2011, decided to defer the consideration of V.T. report until the clarification regarding validity/genuineness of the minority certificate is obtained from the Government of Andhra Pradesh.

“ Valid Minority Certificate from the notified Govt. authority should be submitted prior to consideration for Formal Recognition” on or before 31st March 2012, failing which, the institution shall be de-recognised automatically without any further notice and that such institutions shall make no further admission thereafter.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause notice for the following:

 Details of the other programmes run by the management in the same building/premises is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records

available with no further notice.

12 SRCAPP343 Srujana College of Elementary Education, S.No.306, Penpahadrd, Durajpally, 3. D.Ed Suryapet, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh submitted an application to SRC-NCTE for Srujana grant of recognition for D.El.Ed course on online 29.09.2010 College of Education The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Suryapet Government for recommendation on 17.01.2011/07.03.2011 . A deficiency letter Nalgonda was issued to the institution on 18;.01.2011 District AP for the following Points

 Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 5.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Endowment funds- the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 5.00 lakhs towards Endowment funds vide no 0732178 dated 13.09.2010 for five years issued by State Bank of Hyderabad. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original as per regulation.  Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs 3.00 lakhs of Nationalized bank towards Reserved fund - the institution has submitted photo copy of FDR of Rs 3.00 lakhs towards Reserved funds vide no 0732179 dated 13.09.2010 for five years issued by State Bank of Hyderabad. Hence the institution is required to submit FDR in original as per regulation.  Building completion certificate:- The institution has not submitted the building completion certificate. Hence the institution is required to submit Building completion certificate issued by local civil authority  Notarized copy of Change of land use Certificate issued by the competent authority - the institution has not submitted the copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of (conversion of land utilization) LUC (Agriculture lands – conversion to Non – Agricultural purpose) issued by Revenue Department  Minority Certificate:- the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in this regard. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority.  Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority :- The institution has submitted Photocopy of Sale Deed but not certified by the competent authority. Hence, the institution is required to submit certified copy of the land documents issued by the office of the Sub-Registrar or Competent issuing authority.

Status of other documents as per clause 7(1) of regulation on 2009 is as follows: Affidavit of Rs 100/- for survey no. 306 submitted. Building plan submitted approved by Gram Panchayat – S.No.306

The committee in its 203rd meeting hled on on 31st March and 1st April 2011, considered the reply of institution dt. 18.03.2011 for the deficiencies and decided to cause inspection of the institution under Section 14 of NCTE Act to verify the infrastructural and instructional facilities.

The Inspection of the institution was done on 18/04/2011.

The committee in 205th meeting held on 18-19 of May 2011, decided to defer the consideration of V.T. report until the clarification regarding validity/genuineness of the minority certificate is obtained from the Government of Andhra Pradesh.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause notice for the following:

 From VCD the building appears to be ment for School purpose and not suitable for teacher education programme.

 Notarised copy of the land usage certificate is to be submitted.

 Building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is to be submitted.

 Certified copy of the registered land documents is to be submitted.

 Approved building with Sy.numbers etc, is to be submitted.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30 days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available with no further notice.

LOI Cases

124 APS09637 Lakshmi Vishnu Priya Educational Women & Rural Development B.Ed Society,Kadapa Distt, Andhra Pradesh Sri An application was submitted by Lakshmi Vishnu Priya Educational Women & Narayanadri Rural Development Society, Kadapa Distt, Andhra Pradesh for grant of College of recognition to B.Ed Course in the office of SRC-NCTE Bangalore vide dated Education, 24.10.2008. Kadapa The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the State Govt. of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009 not to further recognize/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed., D.Ed., and physical Education. Another letter dated 17.03.2009 has been received from NCTE Head Quarters informing that the recommendation of the Govt. of AP not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed., D.Ed. and physical Education courses have further considered in SRC 140 1

and decided to no further recognition/permission to any institution in the state of Andhra Pradesh.

The above letter dated 07.01.2009, 07.02.2009 and 17.03.2009 were considered by SRC in its 172nd meeting held on 25-26th March 2009 and decided to accept the recommendation of State Govt. and not to grant recognition to any of the teacher training institution in the state AP for the year of 2009-2010 and return the application with procession fee on 28.04.2009.

The institution ignored to approach Appellate Authority, NCTE Head Quarters and directly approached Hon’ble High Court in writ petition no 13354/2010 wherein the Hon’ble High court passed an order as under:-

This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:-

“ the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above-mentioned order in writ petition no 6712/2009 with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the application of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.”

The order copy in 6712 of 2009 shall form part of this order.

The matter was considered by the Committee in its 194th Meeting held on 30-22 July, 2010 and it was decided to cause inspection of the institution for B.Ed course, after payment of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee and on submission of all the relevant supporting documents relating to building, land, including Building Completion Certificate from the competent Government Engineer and Land Use Certificate. Accordingly, inspection of the institution was carried on 04.09.2010. The institution has till date not submitted inspection fee of Rs.40000/- though we have written to institution on 06.08.2010.

The Committee in its 196th meeting held on 15-16 September 2010 considered the VT Report and all the relevant documentary evidences and was decided to serve Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institute has replied on 18.11.2010.

SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22nd –23rd December, 2010 considered all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to issue Show cause Notice. Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution for seeking clarification on 03.02.2011. The institution has submitted its written representation on 21.02.2011.

As per direction of Southern Regional Committee in its meeting 202nd, letter of intent prior to recognition was issued to applicant institution on 06.04.2011.

In response to this office letter dt. 06.04.2011 the institution has submitted reply vide letter dt. 16.05.2011. As per regulation 2007 one principal, seven lecturers are required for B.Ed course. 141 1

The Committee considered the matter and it was decided to serve Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following deficiencies:-

 Educational Qualification Certificates of Principal and Lecturers not submitted to ascertain eligibility of Principal & Lecturers & experience certificates are not submitted.

 Website details is not submitted to ascertain the details uploaded in website.

 The management has appointed the teaching faculty on temporary basis.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue Notice to the institution and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter, failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

125 APS09549 Sri. Kanakadas D.Ed College, C/o Beereshwar High School, No.289 & D.Ed. 290, Bilagi, Bagalkot-587116, Karnataka. Sri Sri. Kanakadas D.Ed College, C/o Beereshwar High School, No.289 & 290, Kanakadas D.Ed College Bilagi, Bagalkot-587116, Karnataka has submitted application for starting D.Ed Bagalkot course of one year duration with an intake of 50 students on 30.06.2008.

The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th-28th April, 2011 considered the written representation for notice latest VCD and latest Photographs and it is satisfied that the above institution has adequate financial resources, accommodation, library, laboratory as prescribed in the norms and standards and that it fulfils all such other conditions relating to infrastructural and instructional facilities required for proper functioning of the institution for a teacher education course the institution dated 19.04.2011 and decided to issue Letter of Intent before grant of formal recognition under regulation 7(11) is considered. Accordingly, a Letter of Intent issued to the institution on 04.05.2011. The institution has submitted its reply on 18.05.2011.

The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18-19 May, 2011 considered the LOI reply of the institution and its was decided to issue Notice. The institution has submitted

its reply on 27.05.2011 and 08.06.2011.

The institution has stated that by seeing notice board and web site came to know that one teacher is not having M.Ed, so they have replaced one Lecturer namely Saroja.S.Sajjanar having B.A. M.Ed and the same has been approved by DIET, Ilkal, Bagalkot. The institution has submitted qualification certificate and Affidavit of Saroja S. Sajjanar. The institution has also submitted experience certificate of Shri.D.M.Kuri having 5 years experience in Shri.Kalidas Teacher Training Institute, Bijapur. The M.Ed certificates of all other Lecturers were also submitted.

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to D.Ed., course of Two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) students.

126 SRCAPP294 SRM College of Education, Saroornagar. Andra Pradesh submitted an B.Ed. application to SRC-NCTE for grant of recognition for B.Ed course on 27/09/2010. SRM College of Education, The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Guntur Government for recommendation on 09.11.2010/04.02.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 09.12.2010 for the following Points:

 Certified copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority: the institution has submitted gift Settlement Deed but not certified by competent authority. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of the same issued by the competent authority in english version.  Building completion certificate: the institution has submitted building completion certificate from private engineer. Hence the institution is required to submit building completion certified issued by local civil authority/Government Engineer. (copy enclosed)  Notarized copy of change of land use certificate issued by the competent authority: the institution has not submitted land use certificate. Hence the institution is required to submit notarized copy of LUC(Agriculture lands- conversion of Non-Agriculture purpose) issued by Revenue Department.  Minority certificate: the institution is minority institution as per application form, however the institution has not submitted minority certificate in the name of college. Hence the institution is required to submit minority certificate issued by competent authority.  The authority approving building Plan is in local language it may be specified in English.

The committee considered the reply of institution dt. 07/02/2011 for the

deficiencies and decided to cause inspection of the institution under Section 14 of NCTE Act to verify the infrastructural and instructional facilities.

Accordingly, inspection of the institution was conducted on 09.04.2011.

As per direction of southern regional committee in its meeting 204th letter of intent prior to recognition was issued to applicant institution on 06.05.2011

The institution has submitted reply vide letter dt. 27.05.2010.

 Educational Qualification Certificates of Principal and Lecturers not submitted to ascertain eligibility of Principal & Lecfturers & experience certificates are not submitted.

 Website details is not submitted to ascertain the details uploaded in website.

 Letter from the Affiliating University with regard to list of staff appointed is not submitted, only the list of staff is signed by Dean, Faculty of Education, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Andhrapradesh is submitted.

 The management not submitted academic certificate/experience certificate in respect of all teaching staff.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue Notice to the institution and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter, failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice.

127 APS09669 An application was submitted by Ushodaya Residential School Committee, B.Ed Palnadu Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh for grant of recognition to B.Ed course in College of the office of SRC-NCTE, vide dated 30.10.2008 Education, Guntur The file was under process and in the meanwhile, in view of the recommendations of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 07.01.2009 not to further recognised/permit the institutions for conducting B.Ed, D.Ed, Physical Education, Language Pandit course(s).

The SRC in its 169th Meeting held on 12-13 January, 2009 having considered the letter dated 07.01.2009 of State Government of Andhra Pradesh and decided to give effect to the above decision of State Government of Andhra Pradesh as such, with immediate effect. 144 1

A letter dated 17.03.2009 has been received from NCTE, Hqrs informing that

“ The recommendations of the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh not to grant recognition/permission in respect of other courses like B.Ed, D.Ed and Physical Education courses have further been decided that no further Recognition/ Permission to any institution in the State of Andhra Pradesh be considered by SRC for the academic session 2009-2010 for B.Ed, D.Ed, and Physical Education courses also”.

As per the decision of SRC the application was closed on 27.04.2009 and original application and DD for Rs.40000/- to the institution is returned.

The Institute has approached to Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.21400/2010.

Now, the Hon’ble High Court has passed an order on 27.08.2010 as hereunder: “In the light of he orders passed by this court in similar W.P.Nos.6714 of 2009, 9360 of 2010, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s application for starting B.Ed., course in accordance with law without reference to the State Government’s policy dated 17.01.2009. Post along with W.P. Nos 6714 of 2009, 9360of 2010 and 11078 of 2010”.

SRC considered the matter in its 196th Meeting held on 15-16 September, 2010 Meeting held on 15-16 September, 2010 meeting and directed the Management/institution to resubmit the old application returned by SRC along with necessary documents as originally submitted relating to land, building, FDR, Application fee, Building Completion Certificate from competent Government Engineer/authority and other relevant aspects for processing and for necessary action.

As per direction of Regional Committee a letter was issued on 25.10.2010. In response to this office letter dated 25.10.2010 the institution has submitted reply

vide letter dated 27.11.2010.

As per perusal of the file the institution has submitted following documents vide letters dated 29.11.2010 :-

1. Processing fee and application fee (40,000+1,000= 41,000/-) 2. Land documents-The Deed of Sale is Executed on 25th of November 2006 for Sy No 158/9A, 158/10B1, 158/11A, 158/12B. in favour of Ushodaya Residential School Committee, Dachepalli. 3. BCC Certificate from Assistant Engineer. dated 10-11-2008, for Sy No 158/9A, 158/10B1, 158/11A, 158/12B.Ed, Narayanapuram, Built up area-17553.5 Sq.ft. 4. Land use Certificate by Tahsildar. 5. Approved Building Plan by Assistant Engineer, for Sy No-158/9A, 158/10B1, 158/11A, 158/12B.Ed, Land area-Ac.1-10guntas, Built up area-1632.5 Sq.mts. 6. FDR submitted in photo copy original verified. 7. Encumbrance Certificate 8. Bye laws of Society Registration 9. Copy of Affidavit of Rs 100/- Sy No-158/9A, 158/10B1, 158/11A, 158/12B.Ed, Land area-Ac.1-10guntas, Built up area-1632.5 Sq.mts. 10. Copy of Original Application The committee in its 199th meeting held on 23-24 December 2010 considered the written explanation to the notice and other documents submitted by the institution and decided to cause inspection. Inspection was conducted on 07.02.2011.

The Committee considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following :

 As per VCD, it is clear that the part of the building is Asbestos roofed in the 1st floor, which is against NCTE norms.

 As per VCD, ladies toilets, Art & Music rooms are covered with asbestos roof which is not permitted as per NCTE norms.

 As per VCD, plastering walls, internal rooms, front portion is incomplete.

 As per VCD, all materials are dumped in the rooms.

 As per VCD, entrance of each rooms carry pasted papers which reads the purpose for which each room is assigned as temporary arrangement. This should be explained. As per direction of SRC SCN was issued on 17.3.2011. In response to this office letter dt. 17.3.2011. The Institution has submitted reply dated 13.4.2011

The institution has produced self declaration affidavit to the effect that above

statements are true.

VCD showing completion of building submitted as proof Building Completion Certificate dated 10.11.2008 for Servey no. 158/9A,158/10B1,158/11A, 158/12B issued by Assistant Engineer M.P. DACHEPALLY for total built up area of G.F.13,433sq.ft., F.F.4120.50 sq. ft. submitted.

On the basis of the scrutiny of the documents submitted by the institution, input received from the visiting teamreport and videography, the SRC in its 204 th meeting held on 27-28 April, 2011 considered the reply of the showcause notice of the institution dt. 12.04.2011 and decided to issue letter of intent before grant of formal recognition under regulation 7 (11) is considered. The institution has submitted its reply on 16.05.2011.

 The Principal is not possessing P.hD qualification/not qualified for the post of Principal as per NCTE norms.

In view of the above, the Committee decided to issue Notice to the institution and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to make a written representation within 30days from the date of issue of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a final decision in the matter, failing which action will be taken including the withdrawal, based on the records available, with no further notice. 128 SRCAPP289 Ali College of Education, 281, 285, NRT Road, Vinukonda, Guntur- 522647, B.Ed Andhra Pradesh. Ali College of Ali College of Education, 281, 285, NRT Road, Vinukonda, Guntur- 522647, Education, Andhra Pradesh has submitted application for starting B.Ed course of one year Guntur duration with an intake of 100 students on 06.10.2010. The SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th-28th April, 2011 considered the VT Report of the institution dated 05.04.2011 and decided to issue Letter of Intent before grant of formal recognition under regulation 7(11) is considered. The institution has submitted its reply on 11.05.2011. The details are given below:  The institution has appointed the following staff members along with Qualification certificate and experience certificate 1. Dr.A. Ravindra Reddy –Principal-M.Sc in Zoology, M.Ed, Phd in Education-8 years Experience in School Assistant Biologiucal Science and 5 years Experience in lecturer 2. G.Yesupadam- Lecturer-MA in Psychology, M.Ed 3. K. Mary Sushmitha Vesley-Lecturer-MA in English, M.Ed. 4. R. Sathya Joythi-Lecturer-M.Sc in Physics, M.Ed 5. P. Sathya Narayana-Lecturer-M.Sc in Biological Sciences, M.Ed 6. Ch. Ratna Praveen-Lecturer-MA in Telugu, M.Ed 7. E. Sunitha-Lecturer- M.Sc in Mathametics, M.Ed 8. Asia-Lecturer ,MA in History, M.Ed  From the Service Certificate issued by Vidyodaya High School dated 25.04.2000, it is stated that Sri A. Ravindra Reddy S/o Raji Reddy having 147 1

qualification of M.Sc (Zoology), M.Ed worked as School Assistant Biological Science from June 1992-April 2000. And also submitted service certificate from Khader Memorial College of Teacher Education stated that Sri Dr. A. Ravindra Reddy S/o Raji Reddy having qualification of M.Sc (Zoology), M.Ed worked in this institution as Lecturer in Education from 19.10.2001 – 30.10.2006  Institution has submitted Affidavits of one Principal and nine Lecturers.  FDR’s converted into Joint account (Original submitted). Endowment fund FDR of Rs 5 Lakhs bearing no 662914 dated 10.05.2011 for 5 Years, Reserve fund of Rs 3 Lakhs bearing no 6629145 dated 10.05.2011 for 5 Years.  Website is functioning.

“ Valid Minority Certificate from the notified Govt. authority should be submitted prior to consideration for Formal Recognition” on or before 31st March 2012, failing which, the institution shall be de-recognised automatically without any further notice and that such institutions shall make no further admission thereafter .

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to B.Ed., course of One year duration with an annual intake of 100(One hundred only) students.

129 SRCAPP86 TNN Memorial Educational & Charitable Trust, TNN Memorial College of Teacher B.Ed Education, No.439/1, Lakshmi Vilasam, Arumanai, Vilavancode, Kanyakumari- TNN college 629151, Tamilnadu of Teacher Education TNN Memorial Educational & Charitable Trust, TNN Memorial College of Teacher Kanyakumari Education, No.439/1, Lakshmi Vilasam, Arumanai, Vilavancode, Kanyakumari- 629151, Tamilnadu submitted its application for B.Ed course through on-line on 27.10.2009. Application of the above institution was received by SRC on 30.10.2009. The application was processed and deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 22.12.2009.

The institution submitted its written representation on 08.03.2010, which was considered by SRC in its 190th meeting held on 29th-30th March, 2010 and the Committee decided to reject the application.

Accordingly, the application was rejected vide order F.SRC/NCTE/B.Ed/2010/18625 dated. 30.04.2010.

Aggrieved by the rejection order, the institution preferred appeal u/s 18 of NCTE Act. The Appellate Authority vide its order No.F.No.89-779/2010-Appeal dated 24.09.2010 reversed the order of the SRC dated 30.04.2010 with a direction to SRC to process the application on merits. In case the institution get recognition on merit, they would be required to submit a minority states certificate for the institution in due course and would abide by their obligation as a minority 148 1

institution, in order to enjoy continuous recognition.

SRC considered the appeal order in its 197th meeting held on 13th-14th October 2010 and decided to process the application.

Accordingly, the file was scrutinized and placed before SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24th-26th November 2010. The committee considered the appellate authority order and it was decided to serve show cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act for the following. Accordingly show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.01.2011. The institution submitted its reply on 19.01.2011 :

The SRC considered the matter in its 200th meeting held on 20th-21st January 2011 and all relevant documents and decided to cause inspection to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the institution submits minority status certificate in case of institution getting Letter of Intent; in other words, the formal recognition will be considered only after submission of the minority certificate.

Accordingly the inspection of the institution was fixed between 7th-12th March 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on 04.03.2011. Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 11.03.2011.

LOI issued to the institution on 11.04.2011 and the institution replied vide letter dt. 25.04.2011.

The Committee considered the matter in its 204th meeting held on 27th and 28th April, 2011 and it was decided to serve Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following deficiencies:-

 The institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority in the name of the institution.

Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 7.6.2011.

The institution submitted its written representation with the request to issue formal recognition order(copy enclosed).

1. Further, “NCTE-Hqrs. in its letter dated 2.8.2010 by quoting a legal advice with regard to acceptance of applications from minority educational institutions needs to be scrupulously observed. The claim of an applicant that the society establishing a minority educational institution under article 30(1) of the constitution needs to be accepted with reference to the aims and objections in Memorandum of Association of the Society and the composition of the Society. The running the institution is from the minority community, this in itself may become the basis for accepting the application for grant of recognition. The appropriate steps may be taken and thereafter information may be submitted”. 149 1

2. As far as the objectives of the trust is concerned is to promote the technical skill of the youths in general especially youngsters belonging to Linguistic(Malayalam) Minority. Communities of Tamilnadu in general and linguistic minority communities of Kanyakumari District to foster National Integration.

“ Valid Minority Certificate from the notified Govt. authority should be submitted prior to consideration for Formal Recognition” on or before 31st March 2012, failing which, the institution shall be de-recognised automatically without any further notice and that such institutions shall make no further admission thereafter .

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to B.Ed., course of One year duration with an annual intake of 100 (One hundred only) students, subject to notorised declaration for minority & an undertaking for submission of valid certificate on or before 31.3.2012, failing which, the institutions shall be de-recognised automatically without any further notice and that such institutions shall make no further admission thereafter. 130 SRCAPP141 Sri Ramanas College of Education, No.2/654, Chidambarapuram, Aruppukottai B.Ed Taluk, Virudhunagar District-626134, Tamilnadu submitted its application for B.Ed Sri Ramanas course through on-line on 30.10.2009. Hard copy of the application of the above College of institution was received by SRC on 30.10.2009. Education, Virudhunagar The application was processed and deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 22.12.2009. The institution submitted its written representation on 25.01.2010.

The SRC considered the matter in its 189th meeting held on 25th-26th February 2010 and on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related documents, Committee decided to cause inspection to the institution.

The inspection of the institution was carried out on 07.05.2010. The SRC in its 192nd meeting held on 10th-11th May 2010 after considering the report of the visiting team as well as other relevant materials furnished by the applicant institution, the Regional Committee decided to refuse recognition to B.Ed course for the following grounds:-

1. The institution has not produced valid Minority Certificate issued by the competent authority.

2. The visit was conducted inadvertently, before getting the proper clarification from the State Government on the requirements of a legally valid Minority Certificate from a competent authority.

3. The institution without valid Minority Certificate, as such, is not eligible

to apply under Minority category.

Accordingly, the application was rejected vide order No. F.SRC/NCTE/B.Ed/2010/19161 dated. 28.05.2010.

Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal u/s 18 of NCTE Act.

The Appellate Authority vide its order No.F.No.89-720/2010-Appeal dated 24.09.2010 reversed the order of the SRC dated 28.05.2010 with a direction to SRC to process the application on merits. This would however subject to the condition that a valid minority certificate would be obtained by the society for the institution in due course and that the institution shall abide by their obligation as a minority institution in order to enjoy continuos recognition.

SRC considered the appeal order in its 197th meeting held on 13th-14th October, 2010 and decided to process the application.

SRC considered the matter in its 198th meeting held on 24-26th November, 2010 and decided to process the VT.

The SRC considered, VT report, VCD, reply to the show cause notice and all relevant documents, the Appellate Authority order dt. 24.09.2010 and decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of Formal Recognition to B.Ed course of one year duration with an annual intake of 100(One hundred only)(one unit) for the academic year 2011-12 subject to the production of valid minority certificate issued by the competent authority and appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic session.

Accordingly, Letter of Intent was issued to the institution vide order no. F.SRO/NCTE/2011/26461 dated 25.1.2011.

The institution submitted written representation on 14.2.2011, which was placed before SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February, 2011. The Committee considered the matter and it was decided to serve notice for providing minority certificate in the name of the institution to take a final decision on the issue of formal recognition order to the institution.

Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on 1.3.2011. The institution has submitted reply on 14.3.2011 was placed before SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 14th and 15th March, 2011 and the committee decided to await for the minority certificate.

Meantime, a court notice in W.P. No. 4241 of 2011 field by Sri Ramanas Institute of Educational Trust, Virudhunagar Dt., Tamilnadu has been received from the Petitioner’s advocates on 15.4.2011 stated that the case 151 1

will be listed for hearing on 28.4.2011. The same was informed to SRC’s Counsel on 20.4.2011 along with brief of the case and also requested to forward the writ petition of the institution.

A court notice along with writ petition has been received from the Hon’ble Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in W.P.(MD) No. 1 of 2011 in WP(MD) No. 4241 of 2011 filed by the institution and the court has intimated that the petition will come up for hearing on 6.6.2011.

The institution in its letter dated 21.4.2011 requesting for formal recognition order and also stated the following;

“Our college preferred appeal to appellate authority of NCTE-Hqrs. New Delhi on 15.6.2010. We presented case before NCTE-Hqrs, New Delhi on 19.8.2010. After hearing, the appellate authority

Has revered the order passed by SRC followed by the direction to college to produce minority certificate in due course.

I would like to bring to your kind reference that the appellate authority did not insist to produce minority certificate immediately but in due course i.e during running the college. This will enable us to get minority certificate quickly from the secretary to Higher Education of Tamilnadu Government”.

The matter was again placed before SRC in its 204th meeting held on 27th and 28th April, 2011. The Committee decided to await for court decision/order. The court order is awaited.

The institution in its letter dated 31.5.2011 requested for formal order(copy enclosed).

The institution produced a letter dated 29.4.2011 from the Higher Education Department, Government of Tamilnadu in which it is stated that Minority status certificate will be issued only to the colleges already established. The same will not be issued to the proposed colleges to be started.

Further NCTE-Hqrs. in its letter dated 2.8.2010 by quoting a legal advice “stated with regard to acceptance of applications from minority educational institutions needs to be scrupulously observed. The claim of an applicant that the society establishing a minority educational institution under article 30(1) of the constitution needs to be accepted with reference to the aims and objections in Memorandum of Association of the Society and the composition of the Society. The running the institution is from the minority community, this in itself may become the basis for accepting the application for grant of recognition. The appropriate steps may be taken and thereafter information may be submitted”.

As far as this trust is concerned it consists of members belonging to Linguistic Minority. 152 1

such institutions shall make no further admission th“Valid Minority Certificate from the notified Govt. authority should be submitted prior to consideration for Formal Recognition” on or before 31st March 2012, failing which, the institution shall be de-recognised automatically without any further notice and that ereafter.

On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to B.Ed., course of One year duration with an annual intake of 100 (One hundred only) students, subject to notorised declaration for minority status and an undertaking for submission of valid certificate on or before 31.3.2012.

(Gangadharaiah) (Prof. C. Thangamuthu) Regional Director, SRC, NCTE Chairman, SRC, NCTE