How the Flipped Classroom Works

HOW THE FLIPPED CLASSROOM WORKS 1. Technology is used to deliver more passive activities outside of class time. 2. Time in class is spent on discussion, laboratory, or other active learning events. 3. Technology and active learning are two key components of the flipped classroom model.

BENEFITS OF A FLIPPED CLASSROOM 1. Create a constructive learning environment. 2. Customize learning to the specific needs of the individual. 3. Provide immediate feedback. 4. Build enduring conceptual structures.

REFERENCES:

1. Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures--a proposal for medical education. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366(18):1657–1659.

2. Gardner K. Vision 2020. Available at: http://www.apta.org/vision2020/. Accessed May 15, 2012.

3. Mathur S, Stanton S, Reid WD. Canadian physical therapists’ interest in web-based and computer-assisted continuing education. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):226–237.

4. Nkenke E, Vairaktaris E, Bauersachs A, et al. Acceptance of technology-enhanced learning for a theoretical radiological science course: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:18.

5. Gannod GC, Burge JE, Helmick MT. Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering.; 2008:777–786.

6. Lage MJ, Platt G, Treglia, M. Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Ecomonic Education. 2000;31(1 (Winter)):30–43.

7. Lage MJ, Platt G. The internet and the inverted classroom. The Journal of Economic Education. 2000;31(1):11–11.

8. Foreman J. Next-generation Educational technology versus the lecture. EDUCAUSE -Review. 2003;July/August:12–22.

Information sheet provided by Dr. Brenda Boucher, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy at Texas State University. (November 16, 2012) 9. Anon. Blended Learning: A Disruptive Innovation [INFOGRAPHIC] #edtech #edutech. Available at: http://www.knewton.com/blended-learning/. Accessed June 23, 2011.

10. Anon. Blending traditional and online learning. National Science Teacher Association (NSTA); 2011:8–9.

11. Meyers B. Clay Christianson: Why online learning is ready for disruption now. Available at: http://thenextweb.com/insider/2011/11/13/clayton-christensen-why-online-education-is- ready-for-disruption-now/?awesm=tnw.to_1Bos4. Accessed December 19, 2011.

12. Tucker B. The flipped curriculum. Education Next. 2012;12(1):82–83.

13. Frand J. The information-age mindset. Changes in students and implications for higher education. EDUCAUSE -Review. 2000:15–24.

14. Carbonaro M, King S, Taylor E, Satzinger F, Snart F, Drummond J. Integration of e-learning technologies in an interprofessional health science course. Med Teach. 2008;30(1):25–33.

15. Evgeniou E, Loizou P. The theoretical base of e-learning and its role in surgical education. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(5):665–669.

16. Sherman H, Comer L, Putnam L, Freeman H. Blended Versus Lecture Learning: Outcomes for Staff Development. Journal for nurses in staff development: JNSD: official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization. 2012;28(4):186–190.

17. Sams A, Bergmann J. Flipping the classroom. Educational Horizons. 2011;90(1):5–7.

18. Anon. Flipped classroom offers new learning paths. Electronic Education Report. 2011;18(23):1–3.

19. Anon. How flipping improves the traditional lecture. Available at: https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&shva=1#inbox/135a6ed87b03cc20. Accessed February 22, 2012.

Information sheet provided by Dr. Brenda Boucher, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy at Texas State University. (November 16, 2012)