The Impact of Predation on the Threatened Endemic Kereru (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae ) by Mammalian Predators on Banks Peninsula, New Zealand TeAriS.Prendergast,ShaunC.Ogilvie, and Kerry-JayneWilson Bio-ProtectionandEcologyDivision,LincolnUniversity,Canterbury,NewZealand AndreaByrom ManaakiWhenua/LandcareResearch,Canterbury,NewZealand ABSTRACT :Thekereru(NewZealandpigeon)isathreatenedendemic.Predationofeggs,chicks,andadultsatnestsby mammalianpredatorsisconsideredtobeamajorpotentialthreat.Theimpactofmammalianpredatorsonkererupopulationswas studiedonthreeremnantnativebushareasonBanksPeninsula,NewZealand,fromFebruary2004toMarch2005.Inthisstudy,15 kereruwerefittedwithradio-transmittersandintenselymonitoredforsurvival.Threeradio-taggedkereruwerelostatthebeginning of this study and their transmitters were redeployed, so a total of 18 radio-tagged kereru were monitored for predator-induced mortality.Fiveadultkererudied,3asaresultofpredation.Acatwasrecordedonvideopreyingononeadult.Itishypothesised that cats were responsible for preying on other kereru during this study. Rat and possum predation limited nesting success; however,thiscouldhavebeenoffsetbyreplacementnestingafternestfailures.Catspreyedonchicksandadultkereru,which impactedthebreedingviabilityoftheadultpopulation.Kererumaybeabletowithstandsomenestpredationpressureifthepairis abletore-nestinthesameseason.However,theabilityofkererutore-nestisreliantonthemhavinganadequatefoodsource,so thismaynotbepossibleinpoorseasons.Theseassertionsrequirepopulationmodellingtodeterminetheirrelativeimportance. Nestingsuccesswouldbenefitfromratandpossumcontrolduringgoodbreedingseasons.Adultsurvivalwouldbenefitfromthe controlofpredatorssuchascatsandstoats.However,askereruhaveintegratedintourbanhabitat,managersmustconsultwiththe communitybeforeconductingpredatorcontrol. KEY WORDS :adultmortality,communityinvolvement,domesticcat,Feliscatus , Hemiphaganovaeseelandiae ,kereru, mammalianpredators,nestsuccess,survivalindex Proc.22 nd Vertebr.PestConf. (R.M.TimmandJ.M.O’Brien,Eds.) PublishedatUniv.ofCalif.,Davis. 2006. Pp.282-286. INTRODUCTION Thisprojectwasundertakenundertheauspicesofthe The kereru or New Zealand pigeon ( Hemiphaga Kaupapa Kereru Programme, an initiative to enhance novaeseelandiae )isofaendemictoNewZealand. kererupopulationsonBanksPeninsula.KaupapaKereru Kereru playanimportantroleintherestorationofnative comprises representatives of Ngai Tahu Runanga, the forests,astheyaretheonlysurvivingnativecapable DepartmentofConservation,ManaakiWhenua/Landcare ofdistributingtheseeds(>12mm)oflarge-fruitednative Research, Banks Peninsula Conservation Trust, and trees (Clout and Hay 1989). Banks Peninsula, on the Lincoln University. Kaupapa Kereru was established eastern coast of the South Island of New Zealand, was with the vision of increasing the numbers and range of once knownforitsabundanceof kereru(Evison1993). Kereru on Te Pataka a Rakaihautu/Banks Peninsula Today, however, populations exist in fragmented rem- throughatwo-prongedapproach:firstly,byworkingwith nantsofnativeforestandregeneratinghabitat,dispersed thelocalcommunitytoraiseawarenessandappreciation amongst a mosaic of exotic pasture and scrubland, in for kereru, including their key role in the restoration of relatively low numbers. Deforestation, habitat degrada- indigenousforest;andsecondly,throughresearchonthe tion, illegal hunting, and predation by introduced ecology of local kereru populations including habitat, mammalian predators have all adversely impacted on seasonalmovements,foods,andtheimpactsofpredators. kererupopulations(Mander etal .1998).Kererudecline Thisstudyfocusedonthelatter,theimpactsofpredators. todayislargelyattributedtothepredationofeggs,chicks, The loss of an individual nest due to predation for and adult kereru by introduced mammalian predators kererucanbeoffsetbythefactthattheycanre-nestsoon including possums ( Trichosurus vulpecula ), rats ( Rattus after failure has occurred. However, the loss of mature spp.), stoats ( Mustela erminea ) and cats ( Felis catus ) breeding adults from a population is likely to have a (Clout et al . 1995 a,b; James 1995; Powlesland et al . greaterimpactthanthelossofnests(James1995).Adult 2003).Thestatusofkereruisconsideredasendangered kereru are vulnerable to predation especially when andlistedasin gradualdecline.Littleis knownofthe feeding on the ground (Mander et al . 1998) or within status of kereru populations on Banks Peninsula other closeproximitytotheground.Cloutetal .(1995 a)radio thanthattheirnumbershavedramaticallydecreasedsince taggedatotalof102kereru,ofwhichastoatkilled6and theremovalof99%oftheoriginalforestcover,butnow acatkilled1.Powlesland etal .(2003)alsoradiotagged that native forest is regenerating, it is hypothesised that adultkereru,whichsufferedhighmortalityresultingina forest cover may now better support kereru (Wilson mean life expectancy of just 1.5 years. Of 74 tagged 1998). kereru,41died,8fromunknowncauses,26werepreyed 282 upon (most probably by mammalian predators), 4 were SiteAnalysis taken by poachers, 1 died of disease or poor condition, When a depredated kereru was found, key habitat and 2 were found being eaten by New Zealand falcons factorsatthesitewererecordedtodeterminewhatfactors (Falconovaeseelandiae ).Theremainsof26non-tagged mayencouragepredationofadultkereru.Thosefactors kereruwerefoundduringPowlesland’sstudy,ofwhich7 were:1)thetypeofplantthebirdwaspresumedtohave couldbeattributedtomammalianpredation.Adult beeninpriortobeingpreyedon,2)theheightoftheplant were especially vulnerable to predation from cats and (used to determine the proximity of the bird to the stoats when drinking from puddles and streams on the ground),3)theamountofcoverthebirdhadwhileitwas ground(Powlesland etal .2003).Thelossofadultbirds ontheplant,and4)whatthebirdwasdoinginthatplant mayhaveamajoreffectonkererupopulations,because prior to being preyed on (i.e., whether the plant was a eggs can be replaced, but if an adult is killed, then the knownfoodsource,roostingperch,ornestingsite).The other parent may starve to death trying to raise their latterwasdiscernedbyobservationsofotherkereruinthe young,whichmayalsostarve(Clout etal .1995 b). sameplantspecies. The removal of predators that prey on adult kereru would enhance kereru populations, but these predator RESULTS species may differ from those that prey on nests. AdultSurvival Therefore,theaimofthisstudywastoidentifypredator Atotalof5radio-tagged kererudiedfrom February species preying on adult kereru and to estimate the 2004toMarch2005(Figure1).Thefirstdeathoccurred proportion of the total adult population that is lost to withinthefirstweekaftertheradiotagswerefitted.Itis predation. Based on these results, a finite survival rate possible that this kereru may have been suffering from wasdevelopedforthepopulationofradio-taggedkereru. post-capture shock associated with prolonged handling. Withinthefirstfewweeksofradiotracking,wefound2 METHODS radio-tagged kereru that had been preyed on by an Fifteenadultkereruwerefittedwithradio-transmitters unknownpredator.Becausethesedeathsoccurredduring to monitor their movements and feeding habits and to thepreliminarystagesofthisstudy,3moreadultkereru findnestlocationsaroundLytteltonHarbour.Threedied were captured and radio-transmitters redeployed. A early on in this study, so their transmitters were nesting radio-tagged adult kereru and its chick were redeployed,makingthetotalnumberofbirdsmonitored preyed on while on the nest. The predator was for mortality 18. Each bird was distinguished by its conclusively identified as a cat by means of a 24-hr transmitterfrequencycode(e.g.,Tx12).Observationsof infrared video camera positioned adjacent to the nest. eachkereruweremadeduring4-to5-dayfieldtripseach Onekereruwaspresumedtohavedied. fortnightfromFebruary2004toMarch2005(Schotborgh 2005).Anattemptwasmadetolocateeachbirdatleast once a day during these field trips. Where the general 1.00 locationofataggedkereruwasobviousbutcouldnotbe defined,itslocationwasestimatedthroughtriangulation. 0.80 Survivalofthe18radio-taggedkereruwasmonitoredand 0.60 theproportionthatdiedfrompredationeventswasused to estimate the impact of predators on the mortality of 0.40 adult kereru. Non-radio-tagged kereru found to have 0.20 beenpreyedonwerealsoinspectedforsignsofpredation.

FiniteSurvivalRate 0.00 b ul n AnalysisofRemains J ct ov eb Fe Mar Apr May Jun Aug Sep O N Dec Ja F Mar Theremainsofbirdsbelievedtohavebeenpreyedon wererecordedateachsuchevent.Remainswereweigh- Figure1.Finitesurvivalrateofradio-taggedkererufrom ed,andthiswascomparedwiththebirds’weightatthe February2004toMarch2005. timeofcapturetodeterminehowmuchofthekereruhad beeneaten.Bodypartstaken,i.e.,head,feathers,andfeet, CausesofMortality andwhatwasleftofthe kereruremains wererecorded. One kereru wasfounddeadwithinthefirstweekof Howcleanlythemeathadbeeneatenofftheboneswas this study (Table 1). It did not show any signs of also recorded. If faeces were found near the predation predation.Anautopsywasconductedtodeterminecause site,thentheyweretakentohelpidentifythepredator. ofdeath.Thisadultkereruwasfoundtohaveabroken Bite marks were analysed by measuring the width shoulder bone, possibly as a result of collision with an between canines (Lyver 2000). Inter-canine distances objectwhilstinflight.Withaninjurylikethis,thebird werecategorisedas‘definitestoat’(<7.8 mm),possible wouldnotbeabletoflylongdistancestofindfoodorto stoat (7.8 to 9.5 mm), and outside stoat inter-canine evadepredators. distancesrange(>9.5mm).Withinthelatter,adefinite Tworadio-taggedadultkereruwerepreyedoneither catrange(>13.6mm)wasdesignated.Forinter-canine by a cat or a stoat in a poroporo (Solanum laciniatum ) distancesbetween9.5and13.6mm,thereissomeoverlap patch.Manykereruhadcongregatedtothissiteandfed betweenjuvenilecatsandferrets,soapredatorcannotbe ontheporoporoberriesduringFebruaryandMarch2004. identified solely on inter-canine distances within this Atthissite,another6non-radio-taggedkereruwerefound range(Lyver2000). tohavebeenpreyedon. 283 Table1.Mortalityofradio-taggedkereruandcausesof tion guidelines (Schotborgh 2005). All handling was deathfromFebruary2004toMarch2005. conducted by professionals with years of experience in handling wildlife. So, every effort was made to limit Totalweeksofstudy 56 stressandinjurytothekereruwhilstbeinghandled,and Numberofradiotaggedkereru 18 the bird was observed and found to be in reasonable Totaldeaths 5 health after its release, some distance from the capture site. Causesofdeath Transmittercode n Itisalsopossiblethatthisbirdcollidedwithamoving Catpredation TX22 1(pluschick) vehicleorflewintoawindow,asthisbirdwasfoundin Stoat/catpredation Tx16,Tx28 2 closeproximitytourbandwellings.Ahighproportionof Brokencollarbone Tx26 1 adultkereruhavebeenknowntodieorbecomeseriously Unknown Tx12 1 injured after colliding with motor vehicles. Collision with motor vehiclesafterfeedingonroadsidefoliageis A radio-tagged adult kereru was preyed on while consideredamajorcauseofdeathforkereruinAkaroa brooding a chick in a nest. This event was caught on Harbour,BanksPeninsula.Forthisreason,Manderetal . camera;however,thisoccurredatnightandhappenedso (1998) recommend that food species should not be fastthatthepredatorcouldnotbeidentified.The10-day- planted adjacent to roads, so kereru are not attracted to old chick was preyed on the next day, which was also roadsides. caughtonvideo,andclearlyshowsacatenteringthenest Themajorityofkererumortalities(3)wereapparently and taking the chick. The nest was 2.5 m high in a theresultofcatpredation.Thefactthatothernon-tagged Coprosmarotundifolia tree. kereruthathadbeenpreyedonwerefoundatthesame Afifthradio-taggedbirdwasassumedtohavedied,as timeandsamesiteastheradio-taggedkereruinthisstudy itstayedinthesameplaceforthemajorityoftheyearand suggeststhatthepredationsgenerallywerenottheresult neverleft.Thiscouldnotbeverified,asitwaslocatedin ofbeingfittedwithradio-transmitterbackpacks.Rather, aremoteareaofMountHerbertReservethatcouldnotbe thepredationofkereruwasmorelikelytoberelatedto accessed.Itslocationwasdeterminedbytriangulation. thelowshrubsthebirdsfedin,andtheirproximitytothe ground. AnalysisofRemains Three radio-tagged kereru and 6 non-tagged kereru SiteAnalysis werefoundtohavebeenpreyedonduringthisstudy.In As 2 of the radio-tagged kereru and 5 non-tagged eachcase,asignificantamountofthecarcasshad been kereruwerepreyedonwhilefeedingonporoporoshrubs, consumed(81-89%).Fewofthekererupartswereleftat itisperceivedthatkererumaybevulnerabletopredation predation sites; predominantly the primary, secondary, whilefeedingonlowshrubs.InastudybyClout etal . andtailfeathersremained.Thefeetwereseldomfound, (1995 a) of kereru survival at Pelorus Sound, 5 kereru and the head of the bird was never found. Few bones werepreyedonatthesamesite,inalargepatchofbroom remained, primarily the sternum or leg bones, if bones (Cytisus scoparius ) bushes on the forest edge. Kereru were present. Bones retaining bite marks were used to congregatedatthissiteinsmallflockstofeedonfoliage identifythepredatorbymeasuringinter-caninedistances. and flowers. Remains bore characteristic signs of stoat Insomecasestheboneswerecrushed,makingidentifica- feeding,includingstoatcaninemarksonthesternum. tionimpossible.Inter-caninedistancesrangedfrom12- Kereru will show signs of stress when feeding on 16mm,whichishighlylikelytobethatofanadultcat plantslowtotheground.Thisisexhibitedbyshortfeed- (Lyver2000). ingboutsandwarybehaviour.Stressduringfeedinguses alotofenergy,reducingthenutritiongained.Predator- SiteAnalysis inducedstressmayhaveimplicationsforkererubreeding The3radio-taggedkereruthatwerepreyedonwere success and may also be a factor contributing to adult found below low-lying shrubs(≤2.5 m). Tx 22 was starvation.Kereruhavebeenobservedfeedingonporo- nestingina Coprosma rotundifolia shrub,underwhichit poro for short bouts and then flying to roost up a tree. wasfound.Tx28andTx16werepresumablyfeedingon Duringfeeding,theyexhibitwarybehaviour(Schotborgh theripeberriesofporoporo.Theremainsofanother5 2005). untaggedkereruwerealsofoundinthispatchofporoporo Adult kereru are also vulnerable, like many native around the same time as the depredated radio-tagged avian species, during the incubation period and when kereruwerefound. brooding chicks. This also impacts on nesting success, because with the loss of one parent, the other parent DISCUSSION cannot raise the chick or egg on its own. At Pelorus AdultMortality Bridge,2nestsfailedasanindirectresultofthelossof Thereareanumberofpossiblecausesofdeathforthe oneoftheparentbirds(Clout etal .1995 a). kereruwithabrokenwingthatledtoitseventualdeath. It is possible that this injury could have been caused AnalysisandInterpretationofRemains duringthecapturingandattachingoftheradiotransmitter One issue with the interpretation of remains after a tothisbird.Inthecapturingandhandlingofkereruthat predation event had occurred was the ability to discern were fitted with radio-transmitters, all precautions were whether signs used to identify predators were from the takenandadheredtoundertheDepartmentofConserva- predatoroftheadultkereruorwereasubsequent 284 that scavenged on the remains. There were a lot of ing on the fruit of low-lying (<3 m) poroporo shrubs. possumfaecesaroundpredationsites,soitispresumed Poroporoproducesfruit11monthsoftheyear;however, thatpossumsmayhavebeenscavengingkereruremains. ithasapeakfruitingduringthehottesttimeoftheyear They were probably attracted to the area for the same (January-February). Control of predators, therefore, reasonthatthekereruwerethere,tofeedontheporoporo wouldbebestfocusedduringpeakfruitingofporoporo berries.Forthisreason,theidentificationoftheprimary whenadultkereruarevulnerabletopredation.Itwasnot predator could not be conclusively discerned from determinedwhetherthecatswereferalordomestic.Cat scavengers. ownersinareasadjacenttokey habitatsitesneedtobe Formostpredators,thekillingstrikeistotheheador educated on the threat that their pets pose to kereru thebackoftheneck.Therefore,todistinguishbetween populations. It is recommended that cat owners keep predatorsandscavengers,Lyver(2000)suggestsexamin- theircatsinsideduringthenight(fromduskuntildawn), ingbitemarksontheskull,astheseareusuallythekilling asthisisthetimewhencatsaremostsuitedforhunting bites and should be used to determine the predator. (Fitzgerald1998,SaundersandMaloney2001). However, in this study no skulls of preyed birds were foundatanyofthepredationevents.Therefore,analysis ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ofbitemarksonotherbonescanonlybeusedtoprovide We acknowledgethe followingorganisationsandindividuals for circumstantialevidenceofwhichpredatorwasresponsi- theirsupportofthisstudy:ManaakiWhenua/LandcareResearch,Pest ble,becausewecannotdistinguishbetweenpredatorsand ControlResearch,NgaiTahuRunanga,KaupapaKereru,Christchurch scavengers. CityCouncilRangers,OrtonBradleyParkCouncilandOrtonBradley ParkRangers,andthestaffandstudentsatLincolnUniversity. PredatorsofAdultKereru Cats were identified as a major predator of adult LITERATURECITED kereru in this study. Video evidence showed that cats CLOUT , M., K. DENYER , R. E. JAMES , AND I. G. MCFADDEN . were possibly the predator of a radio-tagged adult bird 1995 a. Breeding success of New Zealand pigeons and conclusively a predator of a kereru chick (Prender- (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae ) in relation to control of gast2006).Itwasnotdetermined,however,whetherthe introducedmammals.NZJ.Ecol.19:209-212. cat was feral or domestic. The distances of the inter- CLOUT ,M.,ANDJ. R. HAY .1989.Theimportanceofbirdsas caninebitemarks(12-16mm)foundonthebonesofthe browsers, pollinators and seed dispersers in New Zealand kereru carcasses were consistent with that of cats forests.NZJ.Ecol.12(Suppl.):27-33. (>13mm). CLOUT ,M. N., B. J. KARL ,R. J. PIERCE ,ANDH. A. ROBERTSON . Australasian harriers are natural predators of kereru 1995 b. Breeding and survival of New Zealand pigeons and were present at the sites where adult kereru were Hemiphaganovaeseelandiae .Ibis137:264-271. preyedon.Whenkereruspottedharriershoveringabove EVISON ,H.1993.TeWaipounamu–TheGreenstoneIsland: them,theyinstinctivelytooktotheairandcircled.Stoats A History of the Southern Maori during the European werepresentatOrtonBradleyduringthisstudy.Stoats ColonisationofNewZealand.AorakiPress,Christchurch, havebeenidentifiedinotherstudiesasmajorpredatorsof NZ.582pp. adultkereruinshrubs(Clout etal .1995 a).Becauseof FITZGERALD ,B. M.1998.Housecat.Pp.330-348 in:C.M. thelowproximitytotheground,itispossiblethatferrets King (Ed.), The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals. (Mustela furo ) could have been responsible for the Oxford,Auckland. predationsthatoccurredinlow-lyingshrubs. JAMES , R. E. 1995. Breeding ecology of the New Zealand pigeon at Wenderholm Regional Park. M.Sc. thesis, CONCLUSIONS UniversityofAuckland,NZ.93pp. Becausewearedealingwithapopulationofkereruin LYVER ,P. O. B.2000.Identifyingmammalianpredatorsfrom and around human habitation, we as managers have to bitemarks:atoolforfocusingwildlifeprotection.Mammal considerthehumanelement.Localresidentialproperties Rev.30:31-44. withnativeandexoticplantingscontributetokererudiet MANDER ,C., R. HAY ,ANDR. POWLESAND .1998.Monitoring andincreasehabitat.Withhumanhabitation,though,also and management of kereru Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae . comes an increase of predators such as cats and dogs. Rept.No.15,Dept.ofConservation,Wellington,NZ. Therefore,predatorcontrolmaynotbeapplicable,aspets POWESLAND , R. G., D. E. WILLS , A. C. AUGUST , AND C. K. maybeimpacted.Agriculturalpracticesmaybebenefi- AUGUST .2003.Effectsofa1080operationonkakaand cial,aspredatorssuchaspossumsandcatsarecontrolled kererusurvivalandnestingsuccess,WhirinakiForestPark. to protect livestock from diseases passed on by these NZJ.Ecol.27:125-137. predators. For management to be successful, there are PRENDERGAST , S. T. 2006. The impact of predation on the manyconsiderationsthatneedtobedealtwith,whichcan kereru( Hemiphaganovaeseelandiae )onBanksPeninsula. only be achieved through proper consultation. The M.Appl.Sc.thesis,LincolnUniversity,Canterbury,NZ. successofKaupapaKereruisthatthelocalcommunityis SAUNDERS , M. D., AND R. F. MALONEY . 2001. Causes of involved and is supportive of the programme goals. mortality at nests of ground-nesting birds in the Upper Research to enhance kereru populations is disseminated WaitakiBasin,SouthIsland,NewZealand:a5-yearvideo to the local community through pamphlets, calendars, study.Biol.Conserv.106:225-236. localpublications,andpublictalks. SCHOTBORGH , H. M. 2005. An analysis of home ranges, Thisstudyidentifiedcatsasamajorpredatorofadult movements, foods, and breeding of kereru ( Hemiphaga kereru.Kereruwereoccasionallypreyedonwhilefeed- novaeseelandiae ) in a rural-urban landscape on banks 285 Peninsula, New Zealand. M.Appl.Sc. thesis, Lincoln University,Canterbury,NZ.103pp. WILSON ,H.1998.LivinginRaoulcountry:thechangingflora andvegetationofBanksPeninsula.Pp.101-121 in:C.J. Burrows(Ed.),EtienneRaoulandCanterburyBotany1840- 1996. Canterbury Botanical Society, Maunka Press, Christchurch,NZ.

286